Thanks for hammering on the observable vs entire universe issue. I have been noticing this same confusing vagueness expounded by lots of other science writers for decades now. Sagan, Krauss, Carroll, Hossenfelder, Degrasse-Tyson, and most others all , sometimes, say "the universe" when they should say "the observable universe" .
I love this podcast series. But the more I dive into it the more I can’t shake the feeling that physics seems to stand on such unbelievable flimsy foundations. I probably can’t understand it enough.
Good interview. Thank you for sharing. When calculating big bang. What happened to time distortion factor G gamma? What about the particle type boundaries? CNB (cosmic neutrino background) fluidic neutrinos and color mixing. The layers of censorship? Cherenkov radiation propigation out. The 12.5 light year diamiter flash over point. The universe is finite just like black holes. Though clearly different in a few ways. Both have neutrino layers and both have berionic to fermi layers. Both have solutions to matter turning into radiation in highly warped space time. E8, E24, M-theory are broken in ways. K-theory might work, still going over it. Plank length also tells the minimum distance for photonic reaction. The black hole part has more solutions. The event horizon being one censorship layer. The particle species that can exist at energy density regime. The last stable orbit of a electron, the fermi to berionic layer or think of neutron stars and degenerative matter. Which has one answer and represents a censorship layer. The particle zoo from CERN has the info for where what particle can live. The fluidic neutrinos that form on a boundary layer. Gluonic melt as neutrinos precipitate in a density regime and color mixing. CNB( cosmic neutrino background) showing a censorship layer in black holes. How particles not only get spegetified but also smeared into radiation. The solution to Penrose blue shift problem. R=0 could be a virtual particle, but CERN also has a prime candidate in the particle zoo. Though R=0 and T=0 big bang would be completely different. The doppelganger part left out existing at the same time.😂 Say the size of the universe when the last black hole or particle decays. Only photons and hawking radiation exist. Double that, putting the second decayed universe next to it boarders almost touching. Then rewind the evolution of the second universe to the size of our universe now, and get a probable distance one way. Think proto mass splitting like black hole mergers. Only in reverse for a sister universe. Sorry for the chunk of text. But I love sciences and maths. Thank you again for sharing. Good luck with wonderland. 😊
Fantastic! I love his contributions on Numberphile and Sixty Symbols. Can't wait to watch an uncut interview!
Thanks for hammering on the observable vs entire universe issue. I have been noticing this same confusing vagueness expounded by lots of other science writers for decades now. Sagan, Krauss, Carroll, Hossenfelder, Degrasse-Tyson, and most others all , sometimes, say "the universe" when they should say "the observable universe" .
Yes I’m glad I found this out as well!
Great to get an insight into Antonios "real" work.
Great guest, Tim. I now have another video on my to-watch list.
I love this podcast series. But the more I dive into it the more I can’t shake the feeling that physics seems to stand on such unbelievable flimsy foundations. I probably can’t understand it enough.
Good interview. Thank you for sharing. When calculating big bang. What happened to time distortion factor G gamma? What about the particle type boundaries? CNB (cosmic neutrino background) fluidic neutrinos and color mixing. The layers of censorship? Cherenkov radiation propigation out. The 12.5 light year diamiter flash over point. The universe is finite just like black holes. Though clearly different in a few ways. Both have neutrino layers and both have berionic to fermi layers. Both have solutions to matter turning into radiation in highly warped space time. E8, E24, M-theory are broken in ways. K-theory might work, still going over it. Plank length also tells the minimum distance for photonic reaction. The black hole part has more solutions. The event horizon being one censorship layer. The particle species that can exist at energy density regime. The last stable orbit of a electron, the fermi to berionic layer or think of neutron stars and degenerative matter. Which has one answer and represents a censorship layer. The particle zoo from CERN has the info for where what particle can live. The fluidic neutrinos that form on a boundary layer. Gluonic melt as neutrinos precipitate in a density regime and color mixing. CNB( cosmic neutrino background) showing a censorship layer in black holes. How particles not only get spegetified but also smeared into radiation. The solution to Penrose blue shift problem. R=0 could be a virtual particle, but CERN also has a prime candidate in the particle zoo. Though R=0 and T=0 big bang would be completely different. The doppelganger part left out existing at the same time.😂 Say the size of the universe when the last black hole or particle decays. Only photons and hawking radiation exist. Double that, putting the second decayed universe next to it boarders almost touching. Then rewind the evolution of the second universe to the size of our universe now, and get a probable distance one way. Think proto mass splitting like black hole mergers. Only in reverse for a sister universe. Sorry for the chunk of text. But I love sciences and maths. Thank you again for sharing. Good luck with wonderland. 😊
In US billion is 10-12 - in Europe billion is 10-9
What is used in science and math now?