Model for model the Kawai US 50 has a much better depth and warmer tone than the more bright UX. I would chose the Kawai as more in to classical playing
Interesting. I found the Yamaha mellower and not so bright. I guess I didn't find either to be bright. Kawai always has a more saturated tone vs. Yamaha's crisper tone. That's a characteristic of the differences in their tones.
@@mrchingpianojournal1768 Ambos son excelentes instrumentos como dices pero pienso que Yamaha tiene más experiencia en la tradición constructiva y artesanal.
![MrChingPiano [Journal Shorts]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/ZH5pkTUSEkTAgpNrcj8CXJ3XShllUVYdK112By1OLQ0Vi-nUo2TWtEbG32iQBmRsVU7cJ0FS=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
![[第二集] Piano Tan 游 Kawai Malaysia 记: 原来Piano Tan会说日文？| Kawai K-500 & K-800AS: 直立钢琴界的天花板？](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/19B6uJ7S03c/mqdefault.jpg)
The video content is so excellent, congratulations
Thx🙏🏻 Glad you like it!
神仙打架，其实都很好
I am professional piano technician. Kawai upright sounds even better than Yamaha grand.
Model for model the Kawai US 50 has a much better depth and warmer tone than the more bright UX.
I would chose the Kawai as more in to classical playing
Interesting. I found the Yamaha mellower and not so bright. I guess I didn't find either to be bright. Kawai always has a more saturated tone vs. Yamaha's crisper tone. That's a characteristic of the differences in their tones.
Bcoz the Yamaha we got did a hammerhead revoicing and retone to make it sound less brighter 🤫
Yamaha is better
both are nearly the same n depend to individual preference 😊
but I agree with u Yamaha is better because
It have the edge over Kawai in certain aspect
@@mrchingpianojournal1768 Ambos son excelentes instrumentos como dices pero pienso que Yamaha tiene más experiencia en la tradición constructiva y artesanal.
@@luisito948
sí exactamente😊
請問kawai us50已經40歲了，二手還有入手價值嗎？
@@ChenChangChenChen 有
毕竟以前的材料素质比较好