I don't think there's anything more fascinating than the idea that the universe is probably infinite. Mind-boggling. Thanks for bringing this brilliant guest, professor Krauss. Greetings from Zagreb, Croatia!
I have a dream to get graduation from one of world class university. But now I am dazzling on economic crisis on my family so I have to go abroad for money. And it's been a dream to meet you scientists in future. Thank you for podcast with Alan. From Himalaya Nepal.
Wonderful comment. I wish you all the luck with your education. I'm sure that your family loves you and will support your goals. I hope that you make all your good dreams come true.
Are Nepali tu ...ooo shaabji kr ... bakchodi nhi ...tujhe 4 words bhi smjh nhi aa skte ...aur tu abroad ghanta jayega...tu Bina visa ke India aayega aur kisi hotel me bartan saaf krega ...😂😂😂
I love AG's humility and brilliance. I love LK willingness to stream his thoughts with less filter and it leads to interesting discussion! I love them both
on a personal note - I grew up noticing an short article in the back of just one of my dad's early 1980's college Astronomy texts that mentions Inflation. I can literally turn myh back, look up and find this book - William J. Kauffman's Universe, in 1985. I of course, read Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" and then Alan Guth's "Inflationary Cosmology" book. I've stuck with inflation through and through.
thanks for these pleasant conversational interviews. They are interesting, informative, and leave me feeling better for having spent time listening. Much appreciated, and yes I'm going to subscribe
I love this interview. In contrast to something you'd see on TV it's unrushed and indepth. You can a chance to really get a complete understanding of everything they cover. Two if the most interesting people on earthj.
Thank you for these truly inspirational podcasts. It is fascinating to hear the first hand recollections of some of the movers and shakers of the last 50 years. Not just the scientists (although they are my personal favourites!), but everybody from Stephen Fry, Penn Gillette and Ricky Gervais to the likes of Jordan Peterson. People I am interested in, but more importantly those I am not interested in at all, have all proved to have at least something to say that makes me stop and think. I also want to thank Lawrence in particular. His incisive and well researched questions manage to get so much valuable information out of his subjects, without being either overly aggressive or too soft. A really useful and entertaining way to fill a couple of hours!
I remember reading the story on Inflation in Scientific American in the early '80s when driving the taxi (down under). I was so engrossed by the reading that I found the taking of passengers an annoyance and could not wait to continue to read the theory that blew my mind, I was 21 at the time. What I found most incredible was how Alan Guth was able to work this out as a process so early in their evolution of the Universe. It never left my mind and it proved instrumental in constructing my own detailed theory of the creation mechanism to explain the Higgs formation and subsequent burst of first light followed by matter and the elusive gravity. It also led me to realise that there was no inflation as a process of enlargement but rather an illusion created by density variation of aether (yes I know it does not exist) and light. The conclusion was that the size of the Universe has to be constant throughoutout time and that the process can only take inside a black hole not unlike static electric charges are created. When a theory is correct there are no lose ends, no mysteries, and all that remains is collecting butterflies.
I wonder if Guth and Penrose ever collaborate cosmic inflation and conformal change of scale theory - I just can't hold back the excitement I had when guth inflation field matches with CMB meaning universe really was atomic sized or whatever and quantum fluctuations are the source of galactic seeds - it well my mind is still blown- and THIS GUY Alan Guth is partly responsible for that discovery. He is so humble. It's exciting to hear him talk when it isn't over my head
Great dialogue between 2 great minds in the world of physics, Lawrence asked very pertinent and interesting questions. There is a feeling in the lay community at times I think, that these guys all know each other so well, but that's often untrue. Some people know some people well but know less about others, so it's interesting when this happens. As for Penrose, Extrordinary claims demand Extrordinary evidence it's true but I don't think he's ever claimed it was true, just that there seems to be some evidence of part of it and no one has critiqued his paper. He's just trying to come up with some interesting work I think, even at 90+. And LK knows that even a universe from nothing had to start with laws of some sort, random though they may be. I don't see a huge difference. I thought of all people, he would be tempted to read it, if only to opine on it.
I've always liked the flatness problem as more interesting than the monopoles problem. I think it was Heinz Pag3el's "Prefect Symmetry" that explained it best for me.
Regarding monopoles, first didn't he state that supercooling would smooth out the topological knots, but then the scarcity of monopoles is explained by the rapid expansion making ~1 per horizon. Are these two points related?
A very nice interview. I met you one time Lawrence, trying to sell you my model of the fractal and that it behaves like the universe. You said publish. Good advice and I am slowly getting there. I am writing up its quantum foundations properties right now and hope to publish that and get some interest. It should, I hope; it does it all! I can show, by experiment, that the fractal behaves exactly as the Hubble-Lemaitre and inflation epoch expansion (and other observations and conjectures). It grows from the Planck size to a size of 1 in 72 iterations. That is fast. Just as fast as the universe is described. I think if we calibrate the fractal iteration to photon light propagation rate it will correspond with inflation expansion. I don't think this will take away from Alan's work as it does not offer causality, just geometry.
Just so you know, when someone tells you to "publish" what they are saying is that what you are saying is gibberish, please go away and quit bothering me. By saying it in this way, the listener is more likely to not get upset, thinking that they CAN get published, and the speaker will then listen to them in full. Glad for those in the public eye that this tactic still works!
Big Bang needs to be modified to allow survival of antimatter in equal quantities to matter by a mechanism called "Alternate Quantum Phase" I wrote a published letter to New Scientist about 15 years ago on this At the time I referred to Backward Time as Anti-Time, because it was intrinsically linked to antimatter. Antimatter thus becomes a prime candidate for Dark Matter, which is mutually repulsive to Matter. My model extends further to incorporate the idea that matter and antimatter are linked in so far as time on the macro scale in our part of the universe runs in the same direction as time at the quantum level in the antimatter part of the universe, and vice versa. This explains why we do not observe time at the quantum level as we do in classical physics. Also we can remove the necessity for the observer in QM on the basis that our perception of time which runs backward at the Quantum Level, causes our macro oriented senses to believe that the observer is affecting the outcome of quantum events.
I get the feeling that no one, yet, has the chutzpah to invoke a theory involving the intentional interactions of aliens at the zero point of the Universe we observe which caused the "spark" that gave rise to the inflation mechanism. Doing so, properly, might offer the most palatable explanation to unanswered questions like the Horizon Problem and the uniformity of entropy in the first 10 to the -32 seconds or whatever it is. We ought to ask what we might do, in the far future, after our agentic abilities have matured hyperbolically to enable us to determine the right recipe of matter and energy to set off a reaction that would produce a new "universe." I imagine we'll first be able to model the procedure computationally in a computer before we can begin the process of showing the feasibility of seeding a new universe. Say, for example, by taking the right amount of Hydrogen, Helium, and Lithium (give or take the addition of a number of other elements) and introducing an ultra high infusion of energy to cause the sort of conditions we believe were extant in the first instance of the universe we observe. I know this is going to initially be dismissed as some manifestation of magically thinking a way around many conundrums facing the scientific approach to solving these puzzles. However, I think such an approach, which enlarges the space of possibilities (pardon the pun) may open doors to newer modes of thinking about and arriving at workable models to explain the processes involved in the genesis of this universe we perceive.
I didn’t know Guth was Jewish, Sean Carrol really is the only physics popularizer who isn’t Jewish (this is an observation and not an anti semitic statement please don’t take it that way) this is an interesting phenomena, perhaps it was Einstein who spurred this. I heard Lenny Susskind say once “Every Jew knows Einstein” When Lawrence or anyone else refers to the antisemitic times of ‘Jew quotas’ I almost can’t imagine it because of how dominant (for lack of a better term) Jewish Americans are in physics. Anyways I enjoyed this conversation and most of the podcasts you have Lawrence, you’ve really gotten better at this over time and I appreciate that. Forward ever forward my friend ! P.S: Hope to see you on The Lex Fridman podcast soon
I have a picture of Al Guths office in MY office. It makes me feel like I have my #$% together. But, deep down, unfortunately I know I'm just playing mind games w myself.
Another fascinating interview by Lawrence Krauss. The only part that disturbed me was when he said that Noam Chomsky was his good friend. I threw up on my mouth just a little bit.
It would come as no surprise to me if it turns out that the interior design of physicists' homes are invariably white walls and ceilings and black furniture..
40 minutes into a conversation with one of the most famous living physicists, and the only voice I can hear is Larry's. Prof. Krauss, if you can just get over yourself and let your guests speak, your decent podcast will become a great one.
Maybe he’s tryn to show off for his old professor! Many say Larry goat top living physicist!! Maybe it’s gone to his cork (head) qwork. !! Yes he thinks he’s the bad ass. (And perhaps he is??!)
the way I remember it, I came up with this idea that the dark energy is an inflationary aftershock. But, I've found that Alan Guth has thought of this. Well, until someone proves it . . .
Thank you LK and AG for a wonderful conversation. I can only hope that you both are around for the next era when we split the quantum into the positive and negative unit potentials chasing each other around in small orbits with varying frequency and radius, i.e. linking the quantum to general relativity. It is all so simple at this level as it takes tremendous energy to form the highest frequency tightest orbits and when those dipoles can shed h-bar they inflate just as Alan suggests. All we need for the model are the + and - Dirac deltas, and then put them on paths where they emit Dirac sphere potentials continuously which take action on all unit potentials, sometimes including themselves. Then we will realize that the error was relying so much on the photon and c. The photon is simply an assembly of unit potentials which are contra-rotating and coaxial, surfing their own potential fields. At this point we will realize that unit potential velocity is not limited by c. The unit potential velocity can exceed its own Dirac sphere field speed, unlocking a whole world of physics that is unexplored.
Lawrence; don't you realize that your belief that the universe is flat, and therefore infinite in spatial extent, directly contradicts Inflation, which assumes the universe is finite in spatial extent? Otherwise it makes no sense to model the universe as doubling in size, once or multiple times. As Guth indicates, around 1:18:00, it *appears* flat because it is hugely large, globally spherical in shape.
I just figured it out. If we want to find Aliens: let's fire fusion bombs at every dead moon in the Solar System. They'll see our Solar System Lighting Up like a Christmas Tree in all areas of the EMS. They'll show up and via a GPT5 type system they'll be like: What in the name of Sweet Baby Jesus are you guys doing?
Avi Loeb(Harvard) dismisses Multiverse theory completely. It is just not science. The idea of dual arrow of time is not new. See Feynman, Sidis and others. If concept is correct then Entropy for the universe as a whole is constant. (Entropy of matter part of universe + Entropy antimatter part = C)
Since sound never completely disappears it just goes further and further getting thinner and thinner would it be possible that sounds created inside the universe are making it expand after all God's supposedly created everything with the word could it be possible
If there are many other dimensions and there most certainly are, although most are still theory, that will change the entirety of theoretical physics. How many theories have been proven false? Why does sub atomic physics not even follow theoretical either? "Ask not where ye came from for even the Lord knoweth not"? Also, do you know anyone who understands the math? So how exactly do you prove it or disprove in when an error of .000000000000001 can change it's entire outcome?
That was a wonderful sweep of 40 years of thinking about particle physics and cosmology.
I don't think there's anything more fascinating than the idea that the universe is probably infinite. Mind-boggling. Thanks for bringing this brilliant guest, professor Krauss. Greetings from Zagreb, Croatia!
I have a dream to get graduation from one of world class university. But now I am dazzling on economic crisis on my family so I have to go abroad for money. And it's been a dream to meet you scientists in future. Thank you for podcast with Alan. From Himalaya Nepal.
Good luck, my fellow Homo sapien.
Constructive achievement luck to you my biraadaar 😄💚
Wonderful comment. I wish you all the luck with your education. I'm sure that your family loves you and will support your goals. I hope that you make all your good dreams come true.
You can learn anything online
Are Nepali tu ...ooo shaabji kr ... bakchodi nhi ...tujhe 4 words bhi smjh nhi aa skte ...aur tu abroad ghanta jayega...tu Bina visa ke India aayega aur kisi hotel me bartan saaf krega ...😂😂😂
I love AG's humility and brilliance. I love LK willingness to stream his thoughts with less filter and it leads to interesting discussion! I love them both
on a personal note - I grew up noticing an short article in the back of just one of my dad's early 1980's college Astronomy texts that mentions Inflation. I can literally turn myh back, look up and find this book - William J. Kauffman's Universe, in 1985. I of course, read Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" and then Alan Guth's "Inflationary Cosmology" book. I've stuck with inflation through and through.
Why hasn't Alan Guth received the Nobel Price yet ?
So wonderful to listen to such a brilliant mind as Alan Guth explain fundamental truths about the origin of the cosmos.
thanks for these pleasant conversational interviews. They are interesting, informative, and leave me feeling better for having spent time listening. Much appreciated, and yes I'm going to subscribe
Alan Guth seems to be a very modest man. His ego has never suffered from inflation
Lawrence Krauss should interview Lawrence Krause and get that out of the way.
Skip to 35:00 for science
Love professor Alan Guth and Dr.Lawrence krauss.
I love listening these podcasts. I don't understand any of the physics, but I love the exchange of language.
I love this interview. In contrast to something you'd see on TV it's unrushed and indepth. You can a chance to really get a complete understanding of everything they cover. Two if the most interesting people on earthj.
I simply cannot conceive of a universe that is not infinite. Just like there is no limit to thinking.
I love your show! It fascinating to hear you guys talk about the universe and how it might have begun. Thank you
CAN'T WAIT FOR THIS EPISODE WITH Professor Alan guth !! thank you so much Lawrence for this quality!
Are there 7.2 billion likes? Cause this video deserves that.
Thank you for these truly inspirational podcasts. It is fascinating to hear the first hand recollections of some of the movers and shakers of the last 50 years. Not just the scientists (although they are my personal favourites!), but everybody from Stephen Fry, Penn Gillette and Ricky Gervais to the likes of Jordan Peterson. People I am interested in, but more importantly those I am not interested in at all, have all proved to have at least something to say that makes me stop and think.
I also want to thank Lawrence in particular. His incisive and well researched questions manage to get so much valuable information out of his subjects, without being either overly aggressive or too soft. A really useful and entertaining way to fill a couple of hours!
LK seems to have acquired no education or understanding outside physics and math
I remember reading the story on Inflation in Scientific American in the early '80s when driving the taxi (down under). I was so engrossed by the reading that I found the taking of passengers an annoyance and could not wait to continue to read the theory that blew my mind, I was 21 at the time. What I found most incredible was how Alan Guth was able to work this out as a process so early in their evolution of the Universe. It never left my mind and it proved instrumental in constructing my own detailed theory of the creation mechanism to explain the Higgs formation and subsequent burst of first light followed by matter and the elusive gravity. It also led me to realise that there was no inflation as a process of enlargement but rather an illusion created by density variation of aether (yes I know it does not exist) and light. The conclusion was that the size of the Universe has to be constant throughoutout time and that the process can only take inside a black hole not unlike static electric charges are created. When a theory is correct there are no lose ends, no mysteries, and all that remains is collecting butterflies.
Interesting. Can you post a link to your theory?
Are you a physicist now? Some great insights here.
Thank you dr Guth and dr Krauss
I wonder if Guth and Penrose ever collaborate cosmic inflation and conformal change of scale theory - I just can't hold back the excitement I had when guth inflation field matches with CMB meaning universe really was atomic sized or whatever and quantum fluctuations are the source of galactic seeds - it well my mind is still blown- and THIS GUY Alan Guth is partly responsible for that discovery. He is so humble. It's exciting to hear him talk when it isn't over my head
Yes, Guth is very humble, not suffering from ego inflation.
Wouldn't Guth & Penrose annihilate each other? Like matter & anti-matter ?
Thank you very much both Alan and Lawrence, fantastic conversation
Alan Guth blew my mind with the possibility of artificial creation of an universe possibility
Great dialogue between 2 great minds in the world of physics, Lawrence asked very pertinent and interesting questions. There is a feeling in the lay community at times I think, that these guys all know each other so well, but that's often untrue. Some people know some people well but know less about others, so it's interesting when this happens. As for Penrose, Extrordinary claims demand Extrordinary evidence it's true but I don't think he's ever claimed it was true, just that there seems to be some evidence of part of it and no one has critiqued his paper. He's just trying to come up with some interesting work I think, even at 90+. And LK knows that even a universe from nothing had to start with laws of some sort, random though they may be. I don't see a huge difference. I thought of all people, he would be tempted to read it, if only to opine on it.
On the contrary, Penroe actually does argue that the pictur he is presentng of the universe is "proabaly" the one true picture.
Thanks Lawrence for cueing up much of the back story that gave rise to Alan’s beautiful theory of inflation.. and yes I watched it to the end !! 😊
Amazing to be able to listen to brilliant people like these. Thank you both!
Alan Guth? Very good one Lawrence! Keep going! 👏
I've always liked the flatness problem as more interesting than the monopoles problem. I think it was Heinz Pag3el's "Prefect Symmetry" that explained it best for me.
Alan Guth would be Fun to hang out with Great Podcast Lawrence
I also heard some cosmic background telephone ringing in this interview ,but perhaps it was deflated.Nevertheless it was intresting for me.
Newsflash: "US Dollar inflation exceeds Universe Inflation for the 1st time, puzzling physicists."
Marvellous. Alan provides a simple explanation for inflation theory.
Yes, bit simplicity is not enough. There are pretty good arguments that inflation is the intuitive but wrong answer to the problem.
Regarding monopoles, first didn't he state that supercooling would smooth out the topological knots, but then the scarcity of monopoles is explained by the rapid expansion making ~1 per horizon. Are these two points related?
A very nice interview. I met you one time Lawrence, trying to sell you my model of the fractal and that it behaves like the universe. You said publish. Good advice and I am slowly getting there. I am writing up its quantum foundations properties right now and hope to publish that and get some interest. It should, I hope; it does it all!
I can show, by experiment, that the fractal behaves exactly as the Hubble-Lemaitre and inflation epoch expansion (and other observations and conjectures). It grows from the Planck size to a size of 1 in 72 iterations. That is fast. Just as fast as the universe is described. I think if we calibrate the fractal iteration to photon light propagation rate it will correspond with inflation expansion.
I don't think this will take away from Alan's work as it does not offer causality, just geometry.
Just so you know, when someone tells you to "publish" what they are saying is that what you are saying is gibberish, please go away and quit bothering me. By saying it in this way, the listener is more likely to not get upset, thinking that they CAN get published, and the speaker will then listen to them in full. Glad for those in the public eye that this tactic still works!
@@stupidas9466 I have sent my paper, it has been received, we'll see.
Nice fallacy Stu, by the way. But you don't make progress with fallacies Stu.
Where can i find your paper on this?
@@gregorykafanelis5093 At the journal I sent it to 4 months ago.
@@fractalnomics Could i have a copy of the original?
I’ve been thinking about this since I heard Penrose talk about it.
Love Professor Guth. Subbed
5:34 Mr. Wizard was Awesome!
Big Bang needs to be modified to allow survival of antimatter in equal quantities to matter by a mechanism called "Alternate Quantum Phase" I wrote a published letter to New Scientist about 15 years ago on this At the time I referred to Backward Time as Anti-Time, because it was intrinsically linked to antimatter. Antimatter thus becomes a prime candidate for Dark Matter, which is mutually repulsive to Matter. My model extends further to incorporate the idea that matter and antimatter are linked in so far as time on the macro scale in our part of the universe runs in the same direction as time at the quantum level in the antimatter part of the universe, and vice versa. This explains why we do not observe time at the quantum level as we do in classical physics. Also we can remove the necessity for the observer in QM on the basis that our perception of time which runs backward at the Quantum Level, causes our macro oriented senses to believe that the observer is affecting the outcome of quantum events.
A great discussion and I learnt a lot. Thanks
I get the feeling that no one, yet, has the chutzpah to invoke a theory involving the intentional interactions of aliens at the zero point of the Universe we observe which caused the "spark" that gave rise to the inflation mechanism. Doing so, properly, might offer the most palatable explanation to unanswered questions like the Horizon Problem and the uniformity of entropy in the first 10 to the -32 seconds or whatever it is. We ought to ask what we might do, in the far future, after our agentic abilities have matured hyperbolically to enable us to determine the right recipe of matter and energy to set off a reaction that would produce a new "universe." I imagine we'll first be able to model the procedure computationally in a computer before we can begin the process of showing the feasibility of seeding a new universe. Say, for example, by taking the right amount of Hydrogen, Helium, and Lithium (give or take the addition of a number of other elements) and introducing an ultra high infusion of energy to cause the sort of conditions we believe were extant in the first instance of the universe we observe. I know this is going to initially be dismissed as some manifestation of magically thinking a way around many conundrums facing the scientific approach to solving these puzzles. However, I think such an approach, which enlarges the space of possibilities (pardon the pun) may open doors to newer modes of thinking about and arriving at workable models to explain the processes involved in the genesis of this universe we perceive.
great way to start my Sunday!!:) thank you both!
Dr Sheldon Cooper did work on magnetic monopoles in the South Pole
I didn’t know Guth was Jewish, Sean Carrol really is the only physics popularizer who isn’t Jewish (this is an observation and not an anti semitic statement please don’t take it that way) this is an interesting phenomena, perhaps it was Einstein who spurred this. I heard Lenny Susskind say once “Every Jew knows Einstein” When Lawrence or anyone else refers to the antisemitic times of ‘Jew quotas’ I almost can’t imagine it because of how dominant (for lack of a better term) Jewish Americans are in physics. Anyways I enjoyed this conversation and most of the podcasts you have Lawrence, you’ve really gotten better at this over time and I appreciate that. Forward ever forward my friend !
P.S: Hope to see you on The Lex Fridman podcast soon
I'm very thankful for such access to such information
Mr. Krauss, you should try to let people speak more.
He's great for that
When are the 3 hour conversations with Lee Smolin and Leonard Susskind coming?
5:35 - I believe Mr. Wizard was the one force that could make me get up that early in the morning as a kid. ^.^
44:22 - Groovy! ^.^
I have a picture of Al Guths office in MY office.
It makes me feel like I have my #$% together.
But, deep down, unfortunately I know I'm just playing mind games w myself.
Good talk, however what about Backward Time? Also how about modifying BB to allow for survival of antimatter by means of alternate quantum phase?
Lawrence seems to be totally interested in all Alan has to say...
everything depends on how huge , the black holes, is , mor universes produced
Why did it stop inflating? Or why did the inflation slow down?
It will keep going until the federal reserve is abolished.
Really awesome chat.
Another fascinating interview by Lawrence Krauss. The only part that disturbed me was when he said that Noam Chomsky was his good friend. I threw up on my mouth just a little bit.
Thanks regards from both smart scientists, in our time’s.
Thanks for a real conversation. Also, I found the subtitles to be amazingly good.
Alan changed me.
It would come as no surprise to me if it turns out that the interior design of physicists' homes are invariably white walls and ceilings and black furniture..
How many times does the inverse square law show up constructively?
40 minutes into a conversation with one of the most famous living physicists, and the only voice I can hear is Larry's. Prof. Krauss, if you can just get over yourself and let your guests speak, your decent podcast will become a great one.
yes! it's so jarring
Maybe he’s tryn to show off for his old professor! Many say Larry goat top living physicist!! Maybe it’s gone to his cork (head) qwork. !! Yes he thinks he’s the bad ass. (And perhaps he is??!)
Yeah he is just a dork
looking forward to watching, Pearlma YeC SPIRAL cosmological redshift hypothesis and model owesa lot to Alan, the 'I' is for cosmic Inflation.
I find the inflation of AG’s mind for physics as interesting as the universe!
I'm surprised that people don't consider the Higgs particle as proof of Inflation.
the way I remember it, I came up with this idea that the dark energy is an inflationary aftershock. But, I've found that Alan Guth has thought of this. Well, until someone proves it . . .
At 1:14:00 Guth says 100 doublings is about 10^25 after Krauss said about 10^30. Guth is wrong. Krauss was right.
lawrence interview dean rickles too
I just wish scientist would change our future generation's dna's in a way that we would all be equal...
Thank you LK and AG for a wonderful conversation. I can only hope that you both are around for the next era when we split the quantum into the positive and negative unit potentials chasing each other around in small orbits with varying frequency and radius, i.e. linking the quantum to general relativity. It is all so simple at this level as it takes tremendous energy to form the highest frequency tightest orbits and when those dipoles can shed h-bar they inflate just as Alan suggests. All we need for the model are the + and - Dirac deltas, and then put them on paths where they emit Dirac sphere potentials continuously which take action on all unit potentials, sometimes including themselves. Then we will realize that the error was relying so much on the photon and c. The photon is simply an assembly of unit potentials which are contra-rotating and coaxial, surfing their own potential fields. At this point we will realize that unit potential velocity is not limited by c. The unit potential velocity can exceed its own Dirac sphere field speed, unlocking a whole world of physics that is unexplored.
If only the universe was the only thing we had to worry about inflating . . .
excellent!!
Thanks again
Lawrence; don't you realize that your belief that the universe is flat, and therefore infinite in spatial extent, directly contradicts Inflation, which assumes the universe is finite in spatial extent? Otherwise it makes no sense to model the universe as doubling in size, once or multiple times. As Guth indicates, around 1:18:00, it *appears* flat because it is hugely large, globally spherical in shape.
No matter how many hints Guth gives him, Krauss just will not stfu.
I loved reading the science fact books by Isaac Asimov
could it be that magnetic monopoles don't exist because of the yangmills gap if the magnetic field existed before the bang, pre existing existence?
muonic fields
building on the shoulders of giants, good interview cheers
Also don't think there is grand unified theory due to existence of backward time.
A special purpose one-time use imaginary particle: the inflaton.
YES ITS CALLED GUESSING"" CREATING NOTHING BUT CONJECTURALISM,A SPORT FOR ALL"",.
the thing if we’re noticed, even the last star’s can do the job .
I just figured it out. If we want to find Aliens: let's fire fusion bombs at every dead moon in the Solar System. They'll see our Solar System Lighting Up like a Christmas Tree in all areas of the EMS. They'll show up and via a GPT5 type system they'll be like: What in the name of Sweet Baby Jesus are you guys doing?
Yeah but it will take them several million years to see what we're doing so don't hold your breath.
lawrence 'in some sense' krauss
Lawrence “more over” Krauss
Alan is hunched over like a mad scientist.
Avi Loeb(Harvard) dismisses Multiverse theory completely. It is just not science. The idea of dual arrow of time is not new. See Feynman, Sidis and others. If concept is correct then Entropy for the universe as a whole is constant. (Entropy of matter part of universe + Entropy antimatter part = C)
once , it’s happened, it will never stops
What's so great about inflation have you seen gas prices
I like science.
Any ideas, which is more closers to truth even if it’s not be proof by %100 can be negotiated.
Is Lawrence! Krauss in love with himself or what
Friend and defender of Jeffrey.
Creep
Since sound never completely disappears it just goes further and further getting thinner and thinner would it be possible that sounds created inside the universe are making it expand after all God's supposedly created everything with the word could it be possible
Isn't quantum-time different than classical-time?
There is no such thing as "quantum time". Time is, by definition, a classical concept.
@@lepidoptera9337 Nope. Spacetime is a classical concept, time in the Schrödinger equation is not Classical time.
@@virtualvessel0 Which church teaches that dogma? :-)
@@lepidoptera9337 There're Science papers on the subject.
@@virtualvessel0 Physicists call that "quantum mysticism". ;-)
LIGHT DOES NOT TRAVEL!
If there are many other dimensions and there most certainly are, although most are still theory, that will change the entirety of theoretical physics.
How many theories have been proven false? Why does sub atomic physics not even follow theoretical either?
"Ask not where ye came from for even the Lord knoweth not"?
Also, do you know anyone who understands the math? So how exactly do you prove it or disprove in when an error of .000000000000001 can change it's entire outcome?
Sounds to me like Alan Guth is saying the universe is factual.
Cool
wow! 😎💯
dr strange says see his movie
Too many adds to watch..
hello
MIT is a trade school😊😊😊😊 Sheldon Cooper.