I am so glad that we have video of Jung speaking. There is a non-trivial number of persons I would give a kidney to just hear the cadence of their spoken words in an interview like this. Fortunately, this video means one kidney spared. Selectivity is paramount. The bit about the intuitive woman having a hunch that a man had visited Jung an hour prior, while failing to notice the glaringly obvious evidence of the half-smoked cigar, had me in stitches. The oracular tone of the intuitive in these circumstances is utterly obliterated by the sensor who, staring directly at the apparently obvious evidence of the other's hunch, raises an eyebrow with such velocity that the sonic boom would bowl over the poor clairvoyant. But what's a sonic boom to an intuitive? A cat's meow? Is dinner ready, or do you want to look at the birds outside? I don't speak meow but I have a hunch you want some mackerel...
I must say this is a rather interesting instance or example of intuition... based on Jung's own definition of the perception function, it sounds much more rare in reality than it's commonly made out to be
I think more people need to watch this, especially uneducated people in the pop-MBTI community like myself. He explains quite clearly his own theory pretty well, and really, he's the only reliable source of information and authority on the topic, as he formulated it over years of analysing clients. It's funny how wackjob intuition sounds from Jung himself as compared to the way people describe it nowadays...
Is it me or has the whole MBTI crowd missed something fundamental about Jung's theory here? Ie that the auxiliary function isn't a secondary, conscious function, but in fact an opposite compensatory function that is found in the shadow / personal unconscious. Generally speaking, there may be as well a secondary conscious function, but this will remain the same I/E as the primary function.
@@dwight4k He's saying that philosophers are introverted thinkers and I think he's saying that because they don't have the corresponding feeling aspect (ie it is compensated in shadow), they spend all their time avoiding women and I think he is joking that, as a result, they end up marrying the only woman in their life: their cook.
![NISAMANEE - TADA (ท้าดา) [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hcQHEPMmJpU/mqdefault.jpg)
I am so glad that we have video of Jung speaking. There is a non-trivial number of persons I would give a kidney to just hear the cadence of their spoken words in an interview like this. Fortunately, this video means one kidney spared. Selectivity is paramount.
The bit about the intuitive woman having a hunch that a man had visited Jung an hour prior, while failing to notice the glaringly obvious evidence of the half-smoked cigar, had me in stitches. The oracular tone of the intuitive in these circumstances is utterly obliterated by the sensor who, staring directly at the apparently obvious evidence of the other's hunch, raises an eyebrow with such velocity that the sonic boom would bowl over the poor clairvoyant. But what's a sonic boom to an intuitive? A cat's meow? Is dinner ready, or do you want to look at the birds outside? I don't speak meow but I have a hunch you want some mackerel...
I must say this is a rather interesting instance or example of intuition... based on Jung's own definition of the perception function, it sounds much more rare in reality than it's commonly made out to be
Never give that kidney away. The wisdom found within these men can be found in all of us, somewhere in the depths.
That's really weird dude... ud give a kidney to hear someone's voice? Tf is wrong w you
I think more people need to watch this, especially uneducated people in the pop-MBTI community like myself. He explains quite clearly his own theory pretty well, and really, he's the only reliable source of information and authority on the topic, as he formulated it over years of analysing clients.
It's funny how wackjob intuition sounds from Jung himself as compared to the way people describe it nowadays...
Check out objective personality!
@@levarestudio I have looked into it a bit yeah... very complex
@@levarestudio Objective Personality is a terrible system, IMO.
Is it me or has the whole MBTI crowd missed something fundamental about Jung's theory here? Ie that the auxiliary function isn't a secondary, conscious function, but in fact an opposite compensatory function that is found in the shadow / personal unconscious. Generally speaking, there may be as well a secondary conscious function, but this will remain the same I/E as the primary function.
@samuelpoulston2964 not all. Just the basic ones that don't look deeper.
I can't make out what he says at the end about the introvert and marriage.
Can anyone understand that part?
@@sirmadam8183 I don't think that's it.
@@dwight4k He's saying that philosophers are introverted thinkers and I think he's saying that because they don't have the corresponding feeling aspect (ie it is compensated in shadow), they spend all their time avoiding women and I think he is joking that, as a result, they end up marrying the only woman in their life: their cook.
@@samuelpoulston2964 Aah ok. Thank you.