@harrisonzhou6706 absolutely, as long as the item weighs less than 5.5 pounds. If it's heavier than that, the robots automatically go to a Goods-to-Person station for picking
Robots will eventually take most human jobs. All the company owners won’t need human workers anymore, and most people won’t be able to get jobs and will be completely broke because of it, but yet all the companies will still charge for their products and services, which most people won’t be able to afford with no jobs and money. (Yea, maybe the products and services will be cheaper since there’s next to no labor costs, but what good does that do to people that can’t even get 1 penny in their pocket ever) And this will only make it that much harder for anyone to start their own business and compete since they’ll be competing with mega corporations that don’t even have to pay for labor. And companies that do have human labor will go down from not being able to compete since they’ll have to charge that much more for products and services since they have to pay for human labor while other don’t, costing that much more jobs and causing that much more people to be broke and jobless. It will be an ever ending cycle that will continuously get worse and worse This is definitely going to hurt everyone except for the company owners, and it will eventually hurt them too in the end since most of their potential customers won’t be able to afford anything from them.
I just completed an automation of a fulfillment center with robotics. Manual labor was replaced by IT and electric-mechanical techs. Physical labor was reduced but head count is the same. yes entry level- low skill positions will get eliminated but high skill technology folks replace them. The robots also have to get built somewhere by someone. There is also the Power limitation of the technology as the amount of juice to drive the machines and the servers that run them is considerable. For a warehouse it works. Put a lot of distance or load and not such an economic solution at this time and at this cost of electricity. Cost of the automation will drop some but power prices are increasing as everything needs to be electric to change the weather. :-)
@@dr.penguin9412 well that's the results so far however doing drugery work when a machine can do it faster and better for the sake of keeping bodies employed doing drugery work strikes me as a drag on the economy. Apply the logic to Farming for instance. The tractor of yesterday is the AGV of today. Sending masses of people out to schye the wheat versus a combine would cause starvation today. It would keep a lot of low skilled people doing something though.
Robots will eventually take most human jobs. All the company owners won’t need human workers anymore, and most people won’t be able to get jobs and will be completely broke because of it, but yet all the companies will still charge for their products and services, which most people won’t be able to afford with no jobs and money. (Yea, maybe the products and services will be cheaper since there’s next to no labor costs, but what good does that do to people that can’t even get 1 penny in their pocket ever) And this will only make it that much harder for anyone to start their own business and compete since they’ll be competing with mega corporations that don’t even have to pay for labor. And companies that do have human labor will go down from not being able to compete since they’ll have to charge that much more for products and services since they have to pay for human labor while other don’t, costing that much more jobs and causing that much more people to be broke and jobless. It will be an ever ending cycle that will continuously get worse and worse This is definitely going to hurt everyone except for the company owners, and it will eventually hurt them too in the end since most of their potential customers won’t be able to afford anything from them.
Imagine a world were technology allows for 100% automation so that no human labor is needed to make anything. The only costs for things would be the materials and energy need to make it. But then how would people get money to buy all these 100% automated goods? Wages coming from labor being used to buy things produced by automation is quite the paradox.
Many thoughts: 1) Comforting to see the efficiency. 2) Bummer seeing human jobs eliminated. 3) Nobody is complaining all shift. 4) Kind of boring at break time!
To see the robots in a real warehouse, check out this walkthrough of the robots in action: th-cam.com/video/XWlQWgRfh6c/w-d-xo.html
great to see Brightpick innovating warehouse automation for order fulfillment. Keep it up!
what is the name of this robot ?? is it available in india ?? how much price it is ??
thank you
Can it pick up bottles or cans?
@harrisonzhou6706 absolutely, as long as the item weighs less than 5.5 pounds. If it's heavier than that, the robots automatically go to a Goods-to-Person station for picking
Robots will eventually take most human jobs. All the company owners won’t need human workers anymore, and most people won’t be able to get jobs and will be completely broke because of it, but yet all the companies will still charge for their products and services, which most people won’t be able to afford with no jobs and money. (Yea, maybe the products and services will be cheaper since there’s next to no labor costs, but what good does that do to people that can’t even get 1 penny in their pocket ever)
And this will only make it that much harder for anyone to start their own business and compete since they’ll be competing with mega corporations that don’t even have to pay for labor. And companies that do have human labor will go down from not being able to compete since they’ll have to charge that much more for products and services since they have to pay for human labor while other don’t, costing that much more jobs and causing that much more people to be broke and jobless. It will be an ever ending cycle that will continuously get worse and worse
This is definitely going to hurt everyone except for the company owners, and it will eventually hurt them too in the end since most of their potential customers won’t be able to afford anything from them.
I just completed an automation of a fulfillment center with robotics. Manual labor was replaced by IT and electric-mechanical techs. Physical labor was reduced but head count is the same. yes entry level- low skill positions will get eliminated but high skill technology folks replace them. The robots also have to get built somewhere by someone. There is also the Power limitation of the technology as the amount of juice to drive the machines and the servers that run them is considerable. For a warehouse it works. Put a lot of distance or load and not such an economic solution at this time and at this cost of electricity. Cost of the automation will drop some but power prices are increasing as everything needs to be electric to change the weather. :-)
@@kurtkohl151 head count is the same…… for now. I don’t trust it in the long run
@@dr.penguin9412 well that's the results so far however doing drugery work when a machine can do it faster and better for the sake of keeping bodies employed doing drugery work strikes me as a drag on the economy. Apply the logic to Farming for instance. The tractor of yesterday is the AGV of today. Sending masses of people out to schye the wheat versus a combine would cause starvation today. It would keep a lot of low skilled people doing something though.
Pretty soon no more humans and a better world until the robots start a war
what if the robots only go to war against each other?
Robots will eventually take most human jobs. All the company owners won’t need human workers anymore, and most people won’t be able to get jobs and will be completely broke because of it, but yet all the companies will still charge for their products and services, which most people won’t be able to afford with no jobs and money. (Yea, maybe the products and services will be cheaper since there’s next to no labor costs, but what good does that do to people that can’t even get 1 penny in their pocket ever)
And this will only make it that much harder for anyone to start their own business and compete since they’ll be competing with mega corporations that don’t even have to pay for labor. And companies that do have human labor will go down from not being able to compete since they’ll have to charge that much more for products and services since they have to pay for human labor while other don’t, costing that much more jobs and causing that much more people to be broke and jobless. It will be an ever ending cycle that will continuously get worse and worse
This is definitely going to hurt everyone except for the company owners, and it will eventually hurt them too in the end since most of their potential customers won’t be able to afford anything from them.
Imagine a world were technology allows for 100% automation so that no human labor is needed to make anything. The only costs for things would be the materials and energy need to make it. But then how would people get money to buy all these 100% automated goods? Wages coming from labor being used to buy things produced by automation is quite the paradox.
Many thoughts: 1) Comforting to see the efficiency. 2) Bummer seeing human jobs eliminated. 3) Nobody is complaining all shift. 4) Kind of boring at break time!