Sir,with due respect your every word is gold please don't miss to give law which is very important because only that is to be quoted in court ,I am pure civil lawyer but started learning criminal law and right every single gold word of yours
Sir, I have watched your various lectures, "latest trend in Criminal Law", execution of Will and Law and Fir and Investigation. I have been watching again and again for the reason, you have tactically brought out the nuances and niceties of the topic, aligning it with the corresponding provisions of law and code . Also you have brought out the interplay of sections within the Act more particularly the Indian Evidence Act. Each lecture/webinar is self contained which would arm the viewers with required knowledge about the subject. Your lecutures and webinars are extremly effective due to your simplicity in explaining and I am greatly benefitted by your lectures. It would an great help for every advocates, if you come out with lecture or webinar on Cr.P.C Thanking You Sir. I
One of the best lecture!!! Thank u Sir....This is my humble request to the Organizer that please continue with this kind of lecture series. I also want to request the organizer to ask Hon'ble Justice Nagamuthu to deliver lecture murder and culpable homicide section 299 and 300 of Indian penal code. Thank you .
Excellent lecture... Honourable Former justice shri Nagamuthu has become Guru Dronocharya to so many Eklavya in the legal world... Thanks Sir... God bless you
Your lecture is an out of the world experience. The depth of your knowledge, your simplicity, your humbleness, down to earth approach, your communication so on and so forth made it a mesmerizing performance. No amount of words can actually describe the positivity you generate through out your lecture. Your keenness that question be asked shows your ultimate love for the subject and your sincerity of course. Sir thank you for this mesmerizing experience and may you be blessed always.
A golden opportunity to all of us to listen, analyze,dissect the minute critical area of criminal jurisprudence, fundamental nuances of criminal trial in point of view of a justice rendering judgement in criminal appeal before Apex Court bring into cognizance of all technicalities to present successfully. Role of a veteran trial lawyer is utmost importance how to convince the Justice/s of Apex court reflected in this lecture. It covers all area from A to Z of criminal appeal,revision, review, slp, and curative stages availing all remedies. This lecture is of great importance for all legal fraternity.
I have the privilege to witness Hon'ble Justice S. Nagamuthu while he was delivering a lecture on Indian Evidence Act and its application in High Court of Manipur Auditorium. It was so amazing that I had asked for recorded video but not available.
Thanks a lot. The whole lecture has enhanced my knowledge. The point your lordship has raised related to Lalitha Kumari case was pending to me for long. That the misuse of Lalitha Kumari judgment is very easy and at the same time it can be misused by the police as well ok the name of preliminary enquiry. But it still remains a question. SC must address this point and bring clarifications
Sir...Pranam.. I have attended so much law webinars but the way you describes law it is simply great and unique.kindly organise a webinar on bail procedure.. Thanks a lot..🙏
Highly appreciated and blessed by your phenomenal knowledge and love towards judiciary.. inspired me lot Sir and remind me of my GURU Honourable Judge Mr. Sirsh S. Wagh Sir... Thanks a lot Sir
My humble request to you Kindly make classes on magistrate trial in various forms as well as adduce evidence thereto. I am grateful to have your classes.
Sir with due respect ,kindly see 173 clause 2 ,which states that whatever action has been taken by police with respect to complaint made by informant ,he has to be informed about it ,but sir in your lecture you stated there is statutory provision but only judgement law 1985 2 scc 537 ,sir please clarify
the defendent got faveur in judgement in a partition suit we are 6 in familly brothers and sisters and after the judgement a advocate was appointed as court commissioner to divide the suit properties as per the terms of prelimenary decree . in that IA THE defendant who got favour in judgement i 2018 was set exparte in 2021 (reason called absent set exparte) in the month of occtober 2021 , this month december i came to know about my ex parte ,i am having a advocate , is it good for me or bad for me ? what must i do to enter the case or leave as it is , must i belive in judgement ..and what is important in a suit - judgement, or prelimnary,or final decree ?
Tq for this lecturing my Lord, one doubt my Lord u r lectured" the prosecution has no right to cross examination of his own witness as per section 137 of evidence act but, I have confused about section 155 of evidence act plz clarify my Lord
Sir under 155 CrPC does police go to magistrate or the complainant , bcz the language of the section is "....and refer the informant to the magistrate" .Plz enlighten 🙏
once judicial custody is given in initial 15 days there can't be a police custody or after first 7 days judicial custody there can be police custody again for 8 days or police custody can be given only prior to judicial custody?
If there is a private complaint against 5 persons and magistrate send it for a police report then in police report police found out if 5 persons 2 are liable for comission of crime and on police report magistrate directs police under 156(3) for registration of FIR.. will it be cognizance take by magistrate on reciving police report or not?
Could anyone tell me what's the name of the case regarding extension of scope of section 173 that an accused Or victim can ask for further investigation. I couldn't hear him properly. It would be a great pleasure
I felt a sense of being rude😅 but it was a awesome so called “gyan ka bhandar” i appreciate your efforts for convincing sir for propagating knowledge through this platform 👏.
Sir my password stolen and converted to false claim of misappropriation. Fir filed before jurisdiction police. Police collided with the accused bank employees filed a b report. Sufficient documents collected during the course of investigation. Same is not submitted to the court
Sir i have a doubt . IF a witness in his 161 statement say that she has intimated the 354 incident to her ward member on the same day . But in court she n do not depose the same. No cross is made in this regard as no such witness is made as a prosecution witness nor any 161 statement in this regard . Can it be asked to IO the reason for not interrogating the ward member.? if to be asked, is it necessary to bring his attention to 161 statement of the Victim?
Please elucidate on 'fair investigation' by police by failure to register case by not registering FIR. Discretion of police by not registering FIR is an invidious discretion.
Sir, with due respect, if an offence is punishable by 10 years imprisonment then for the person accused of such an offence there will be a maximum judicial remand period of 60 days not 90 days. That's what I read in some books. But you said it is 90 days. Please clear this doubt.
Aditya Srivastava the language of sec 167 Cr.P.C. is very clear, for offences punishable with death or life imprisonment or imprisonment of not less than 10 yrs, then the maximum limit is 90 days
My Lord....If that is so whether the detention from the date of notional surrender till the date of production before the jurisdictional magistrate is legal or illegal? Kindly clarify...
I Watced almost all lectures of yours sir I have learnt How to condeuct criminal Trial and it is very healpful to all advocates you are the asset leagil arena of our nation Thanku very much sir
154 CrPC , registration of first information report. in which, police exercise unrestrained powers , by enhancing severity of section of law, and apply in FIR. for ex , 307 IPC, in place of 324 IPC. which shall be , countered at the time of first information stage, received in the court, and entertained under section 159 crpc. Hence, no remedy is seen, and it is going on una bated. currently. pl look into the matter, Nyaya forum......Webinar.
Notional period would not be in calculation of 60 or 90 days whichever may be the case, first of all. The work on the next day will be counted as done on the notional day. Computation of the time is given under section 10 of General clause Act, 1897.
If he is surrendered it will not be treated as he being 'forwarded' by the police before the magistrate as mentioned under section 167 of Crpc. A law student of 2nd sem.
Under 161, does the police officer has power to question the witness if he doubts the veracity? Or the police officer only the power to record the statement and to reduce in writing
INVESTIGATION STARTS FROM RECEIVING INFORMATION ABOUT COGNIZABLE OFFENCES TO OFFICERS IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION. EG. RECEIVING OF SALE OF ILLICIT LIQUOR, GAMBLING IN PUBLIC PLACE
My Lord....If that is so whether the detention from the date of notional surrender till the date of production before the jurisdictional magistrate is legal or illegal? Kindly clarify...
Thank you Sir feeling pround to hear from strong pillars of our great Judiciary ... Respect and love Sir ... Sir kindly request any platform by which we may be get enlighten by your precious knowledge... Warm regards, Advocate Swapnil Jagtap jagtap_swapnil@hotmail.com
Sir, I am U.Chandramouli, practicing Advocate before High Court of Judicature and before subordinate courts. I am deeply moved by yourextensive knowledge on the subjects that you lecture on. It shows your dedication and the mastry you have gained over the subjects and your passion. Sir, i would like to be in constant touch with you. if you could share your contact details, i would be blessed sir. Thanking You Sir .
Sir it deems that it is discretion of the I.O to get the statement recorded under 164 or not of the accused or any other witness including victim. This can be misused by I.O ,what is the remedy then?
JJA 2015 section 24 The bord shall make an order directing the police that the relevant records of such conversation shall be destroyed JJA 2015 section 74.2 The police shall not disclose any record of the child for the purpose of character certificate or otherwise in cases गवर्नमेंट जॉब में डिक्लेरेशन फॉर्म भरते समय juvenile case व सजा दिखाएं या ना दिखाएं
I shall be very greatful to you for having us as your listners for this lecture series has enlightened me to an extent what a 100 books might not do.
did you study at Bharti
Sir,with due respect your every word is gold please don't miss to give law which is very important because only that is to be quoted in court ,I am pure civil lawyer but started learning criminal law and right every single gold word of yours
Sir, I have watched your various lectures, "latest trend in Criminal Law", execution of Will and Law and Fir and Investigation. I have been watching again and again for the reason, you have tactically brought out the nuances and niceties of the topic, aligning it with the corresponding provisions of law and code . Also you have brought out the interplay of sections within the Act more particularly the Indian Evidence Act. Each lecture/webinar is self contained which would arm the viewers with required knowledge about the subject. Your lecutures and webinars are extremly effective due to your simplicity in explaining and I am greatly benefitted by your lectures. It would an great help for every advocates, if you come out with lecture or webinar on Cr.P.C
Thanking You Sir.
I
A@a@@aaaaaaaa a waaawaawawwawwawwaaaaaaaaawaaaaaaaaaaawaaawawawwawwaaaaaawaaaaaawaaawaa w2J
Jo
nagamuthu sir phone number pls
0000000⁰00⁰000000000000000000⁰⁰00000000
Lordship, your lecture is fantastic, I watched many times, I will keep on watching..
One of the best lecture!!! Thank u Sir....This is my humble request to the Organizer that please continue with this kind of lecture series. I also want to request the organizer to ask Hon'ble Justice Nagamuthu to deliver lecture murder and culpable homicide section 299 and 300 of Indian penal code. Thank you .
Please see Friday group seshagiri Rao lectures at supreme court delivered by Justice nagumuthu on culpable homicide and murder
@@sivaprasadreddyvenati9716 yes, it is available there.
Nagamuthu sir phone number pls
Excellent lecture... Honourable Former justice shri Nagamuthu has become Guru Dronocharya to so many Eklavya in the legal world... Thanks Sir... God bless you
Your lecture is an out of the world experience. The depth of your knowledge, your simplicity, your humbleness, down to earth approach, your communication so on and so forth made it a mesmerizing performance. No amount of words can actually describe the positivity you generate through out your lecture. Your keenness that question be asked shows your ultimate love for the subject and your sincerity of course. Sir thank you for this mesmerizing experience and may you be blessed always.
Good Sir, your lecture is best in topic
Justice Nagamuthu is Always Great And Excellent. Thank you very much Sir.
Great sir .
Such lectures must be continued .
It gives practical insight into law .
A golden opportunity to all of us to listen, analyze,dissect the minute critical area of criminal jurisprudence, fundamental nuances of criminal trial in point of view of a justice rendering judgement in criminal appeal before Apex Court bring into cognizance of all technicalities to present successfully. Role of a veteran trial lawyer is utmost importance how to convince the Justice/s of Apex court reflected in this lecture. It covers all area from A to Z of criminal appeal,revision, review, slp, and curative stages availing all remedies. This lecture is of great importance for all legal fraternity.
I have the privilege to witness Hon'ble Justice S. Nagamuthu while he was delivering a lecture on Indian Evidence Act and its application in High Court of Manipur Auditorium. It was so amazing that I had asked for recorded video but not available.
Thanks a lot. The whole lecture has enhanced my knowledge. The point your lordship has raised related to Lalitha Kumari case was pending to me for long. That the misuse of Lalitha Kumari judgment is very easy and at the same time it can be misused by the police as well ok the name of preliminary enquiry.
But it still remains a question. SC must address this point and bring clarifications
Sir...Pranam..
I have attended so much law webinars but the way you describes law it is simply great and unique.kindly organise a webinar on bail procedure.. Thanks a lot..🙏
It should be in book form at reasonable rate for the handy knowledge of common person
And I will be the first one to buy it
Highly appreciated and blessed by your phenomenal knowledge and love towards judiciary.. inspired me lot Sir and remind me of my GURU Honourable Judge Mr. Sirsh S. Wagh Sir... Thanks a lot Sir
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Pls watch this
For the contribution rendered by Justice SN to the legal fraternity, he should be recommended for "Padma" award by union
Sir , Thank you so much , each and every lecture is enlightening and very meaningful. The lecture on Electronic Evidence was superb. Regards
Every lecture of Shri SN is a literature by itself... He must be given Padma award for his contribution to legal fraternity..
Very good lecture for budding advocates. Thanks Sir
My humble request to you Kindly make classes on magistrate trial in various forms as well as adduce evidence thereto. I am grateful to have your classes.
Fantastic Lecture Sir
Thank you 🙏🏼
Thank you very much sir.Brilliant presentation.
Absolutely amazing 👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks lots Sir.Jai🇮🇳Hind.
Sir with due respect ,kindly see 173 clause 2 ,which states that whatever action has been taken by police with respect to complaint made by informant ,he has to be informed about it ,but sir in your lecture you stated there is statutory provision but only judgement law 1985 2 scc 537 ,sir please clarify
Sir your lecture is very impresive
Outstanding
Congratulations and
Thanks and Regards
V K Vishnoi
Wonderfull lecture...
Fantastic lecture Sir 🙏
Honble speech is excellent
Murugavel
Master class lecture sir.
Very informative and enlightening lecture. 🙏
Investigation by private person pls click following link for video
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Thank you Nalsar university of law
Jai Gurudev
Bahut hi badiya
Thank You Sir
the defendent got faveur in judgement in a partition suit we are 6 in familly brothers and sisters and after the judgement a advocate was appointed as court commissioner to divide the suit properties as per the terms of prelimenary decree . in that IA THE defendant who got favour in judgement i 2018 was set exparte in 2021 (reason called absent set exparte) in the month of occtober 2021 , this month december i came to know about my ex parte ,i am having a advocate , is it good for me or bad for me ? what must i do to enter the case or leave as it is , must i belive in judgement ..and what is important in a suit - judgement, or prelimnary,or final decree ?
Tq for this lecturing my Lord, one doubt my Lord u r lectured" the prosecution has no right to cross examination of his own witness as per section 137 of evidence act but, I have confused about section 155 of evidence act plz clarify my Lord
Nowhere in the crpc. said that prosecution is cross-examining his own witnesses. It is only continuous of examination by prosecution.
Excellent sir
Very informative and excellent Sir
Lordship, Mesmerizing lecture!
Sir under 155 CrPC does police go to magistrate or the complainant , bcz the language of the section is "....and refer the informant to the magistrate" .Plz enlighten 🙏
SIR, YOU ARE A GREAT TEACHER!
Great 👍 👌
You are a great mentor
once judicial custody is given in initial 15 days there can't be a police custody or after first 7 days judicial custody there can be police custody again for 8 days or police custody can be given only prior to judicial custody?
If there is a private complaint against 5 persons and magistrate send it for a police report then in police report police found out if 5 persons 2 are liable for comission of crime and on police report magistrate directs police under 156(3) for registration of FIR.. will it be cognizance take by magistrate on reciving police report or not?
Could anyone tell me what's the name of the case regarding extension of scope of section 173 that an accused Or victim can ask for further investigation. I couldn't hear him properly.
It would be a great pleasure
I felt a sense of being rude😅 but it was a awesome so called “gyan ka bhandar” i appreciate your efforts for convincing sir for propagating knowledge through this platform 👏.
Sir my password stolen and converted to false claim of misappropriation. Fir filed before jurisdiction police. Police collided with the accused bank employees filed a b report. Sufficient documents collected during the course of investigation. Same is not submitted to the court
Sir i have a doubt . IF a witness in his 161 statement say that she has intimated the 354 incident to her ward member on the same day . But in court she n do not depose the same. No cross is made in this regard as no such witness is made as a prosecution witness nor any 161 statement in this regard . Can it be asked to IO the reason for not interrogating the ward member.? if to be asked, is it necessary to bring his attention to 161 statement of the Victim?
When alternate remedy is available under section 156(3) CrPC how can one go to high court under section 482 CrPC.....
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Pls watch this new video
Of course 482 crpc is not nessary. 156(3) crpc is superior to 482 crpc.
Good point at 1:36:50
Please recommend sir for Dronacharya Award
कृपया हा व्हिडिओ पण पाहा
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Please elucidate on 'fair investigation' by police by failure to register case by not registering FIR. Discretion of police by not registering FIR is an invidious discretion.
Sir, with due respect, if an offence is punishable by 10 years imprisonment then for the person accused of such an offence there will be a maximum judicial remand period of 60 days not 90 days. That's what I read in some books. But you said it is 90 days. Please clear this doubt.
Aditya Srivastava the language of sec 167 Cr.P.C. is very clear, for offences punishable with death or life imprisonment or imprisonment of not less than 10 yrs, then the maximum limit is 90 days
Good
There is a difference between "sentence may extend to 10 years of imprisonment and sentence shall be not less 10 years of imprisonment.
Sr congrads ,I also follower of you sr
My Lord....If that is so whether the detention from the date of notional surrender till the date of production before the jurisdictional magistrate is legal or illegal? Kindly clarify...
Of course it is a matter to be clarified.
Please clearly make the judgement
"..Awake arise and stop not till the goal is reached... "
Swami Vivekananda
Thanks Sir.
Watch this video on investigation
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
very nice webinar
I Watced almost all lectures of yours sir I have learnt How to condeuct criminal Trial and it is very healpful to all advocates you are the asset leagil arena of our nation Thanku very much sir
154 CrPC , registration of first information report. in which, police exercise unrestrained powers , by enhancing severity of section of law, and apply in FIR. for ex , 307 IPC, in place of 324 IPC. which shall be , countered at the time of first information stage, received in the court, and entertained under section 159 crpc. Hence, no remedy is seen, and it is going on una bated. currently. pl look into the matter, Nyaya forum......Webinar.
Sir...How statutory period of 60 days or 90 days, as the case may be, is computed in case of notional surrender? J.selvam Advocate
Notional period would not be in calculation of 60 or 90 days whichever may be the case, first of all. The work on the next day will be counted as done on the notional day. Computation of the time is given under section 10 of General clause Act, 1897.
If he is surrendered it will not be treated as he being 'forwarded' by the police before the magistrate as mentioned under section 167 of Crpc. A law student of 2nd sem.
@@adityasrivastava6507 Here there are cases in different courts and hence notional surrender arises.
Under 161, does the police officer has power to question the witness if he doubts the veracity? Or the police officer only the power to record the statement and to reduce in writing
As per section 155 evidence act witness can be cross examined know who called from that person plz make it clarify my Lord.
Investigation by detective video this is
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Good
Done
Sir if police officer investigate in non cognizable offence without permission of mag then what is the remedy for victim?
मॅडम कृपया तपास बाबत चा हा व्हिडिओ नक्की पाहा
th-cam.com/video/Ff9b7o7pJwY/w-d-xo.html
Watched
🙏🏻👌🏻
❤
INVESTIGATION STARTS FROM RECEIVING INFORMATION ABOUT COGNIZABLE OFFENCES TO OFFICERS IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION.
EG.
RECEIVING OF SALE OF ILLICIT LIQUOR, GAMBLING IN PUBLIC PLACE
The period will be counted from the date of his production before the jurisdictional magistrate.
My Lord....If that is so whether the detention from the date of notional surrender till the date of production before the jurisdictional magistrate is legal or illegal? Kindly clarify...
Thank you Sir feeling pround to hear from strong pillars of our great Judiciary ... Respect and love Sir ... Sir kindly request any platform by which we may be get enlighten by your precious knowledge...
Warm regards, Advocate Swapnil Jagtap
jagtap_swapnil@hotmail.com
@@bharatijagtap4204 Mr jagtap you can speak over mobile 9445936345
Sir, I am U.Chandramouli, practicing Advocate before High Court of Judicature and before subordinate courts. I am deeply moved by yourextensive knowledge on the subjects that you lecture on. It shows your dedication and the mastry you have gained over the subjects and your passion.
Sir, i would like to be in constant touch with you. if you could share your contact details, i would be blessed sir. Thanking You Sir
.
Sir it deems that it is discretion of the I.O to get the statement recorded under 164 or not of the accused or any other witness including victim. This can be misused by I.O ,what is the remedy then?
Sir, is it possible to provide his lordships email
🙏❤️
28.00
WATCH AFTER 14:00
32.00
JJA 2015 section 24 The bord shall make an order directing the police that the relevant records of such conversation shall be destroyed
JJA 2015 section 74.2 The police shall not disclose any record of the child for the purpose of character certificate or otherwise in cases
गवर्नमेंट जॉब में डिक्लेरेशन फॉर्म भरते समय juvenile case व सजा दिखाएं या ना दिखाएं
116
1107
Justice nagamuthu sir phone number pls
9445936345
Excellent sir
Wonderful sir
Excellent sir.
Excellent sir