@@RealMikeMiller13 I didnt know that until I read this comment. I looked it up and was very true. Used to watch wwe till 2 years ago. So thats why I was in a shock. 😥
@@Unexpectedthings007 Well he still had Nuclear heat after that even when the streak was already done so i can only imagine how fans would react if he broke the streak at Mania 33.
Brock would have made more sense had he (taker) had been more of his ABA persona….. Bray would have made sense as being the new face of Darkness ….Having Roman beat the streak depends on when….. definitely NOT during this Bloodline era…..
I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy for The Deadman.
@@Kosten_2K I can respect him wanting to go out in that way, knowing how old school he was. What’s always bothered me is that Brock didn’t need the win, and seeing that Taker worked every Mania to follow (except 35, if my memory is correct,) there were still a few chances to honor that wish while making a new star. Instead Roman Reigns was put in an impossible position a few years later, and Bray Wyatt was sacrificed for a feud that was without its most compelling element from the jump thanks to the previous Mania.
@@gabepollock1641 ask Vince he was the main culprit for it. I also think Brock also did not want to end the streak as he is already a big star in the company and by ending the streak he will not gain anything from it. I believe in the past there were also some reports that Taker was suppose to be win but vince decide it in last minute to make Brock win it. I think if Vince is smart by using Roman to end the streak and turning him heel on raw next day, we will get one of the greatest heel earlier than the tribal chief era, but Vince with his ego still want Roman to be a face of the company by building him like super Cena at that time.
@@spritzerhijo Roman should’ve never ended the streak in less he was a heel going into the storyline of wrestlemania the way they did the wrestlemania match years after the streak was over was just terrible booking.
It definitely shouldn’t have ended up with him losing twice. The second he lost to Brock he should’ve just retired. Them making him lose to Roman also was pathetic. And the John Cena match was embarrassing.
The WWE has to worry about building other stars up. When stone cold was big they had a problem of finding sombody to compete against him for awhile that the audience could enjoy. So they need to prop other fighters up and get as many as possible. The good ones are retiring and there will be nobody good left.
So much respect and love. Truly though the streak should of never been broke. It is a legendary achievement to have had the streak and the perfect record for the Deadman. I do respect the fact that it did end.
They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful. Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all? Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak. And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!? I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
Literally every wrestler who's been taught the very foundation of wrestling thought that the Streak was always gonna end. That's not Taker's opinion alone.
He could've easily refused to end the streak and Vince couldnt have done anything about it. It would have been a legendary achievement, but he loved WWE more than personal accomplishments. Big props to this man.
@@itshouse2766when was this? Because Taker had said the ending wasn't changed until the day of the event, 4 hours before it started to be exact, and he asked Vince, if he was sure, and Vince replied, "if not him, then who", and Taker agreed after that
That's the point, he wanted it to end. Undertaker had enough pull backstage that Vince would've went with any idea he wanted, and that's why it was broken
Of the two it should have been Bray. The narrative at the time was that Bray was the ‘new’ Undertaker and it would have cemented it. Roman was already destined for his top spot. Bray made it part of his character that he was overlooked, it’s what his second match at mania with Cena was about. Had he been the guy to break the streak it would have shot him to the moon instead of being misused for so long.
Honestly. And hear me out. It should have been Kane. When you think of the Brothers of Destruction you think of Taker and Kane. I think if Kane broke the streak it would have been more satisfying due to their history, and also would have elevated kanes legacy that much more.
Better script imo is, Someone who need the win (like Mark said like Wyatt or Reigns), THEN somehow got helped by Kane to win. This way, the winner will receive hate yet a 'higher status'. From here the rest of the story can be anything. Like, give him a redemption arc or sum and eventually fight Kane perhaps? Idk, although they have history as BOD I don't Kane is the right guy to ended it.
Kane ending the streak in one of the 2 matches he had with Taker would not have been as big. The streak was still very young by the 2nd time they faced off at mania. The first match Taker was 6-0 going into it and the streak wasn’t even talked about at that point in time. the second match Taker was 11-0 going into it. So no it would not have been as big of a deal as when Brock ended the 21-0 streak. Kane was already finished and buried at that point of his career. Bray Wyatt was still young(Only 25)and being booked horribly. If he had beaten Taker in Brocks place, he would’ve became bigger then he was and won more championships and main evented more Wrestlemanias.
They definitely should have, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful. Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all? Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak. And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!? I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
I respect this I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy close.
He's not wrong. Brock was a top guy who got a rub he didn't need so could what? Go to SummerSlam and destroy Cena? Which he could have believably done anyway without this extra feather in his cap. It's like putting over Superman on his way to defeating Lex Luthor for the 185th time.
Brock carried the company for the next 10 years after it happened. Your not buying ppvs or subscription to network without brock being on it. Name on other legit star
@andrewvazquez1936 brock stayed with the company for the next 10 years! You claim all this part time shit, dude, if you watch boxing you get floyd Mayweather twice a year. Brock ruled wwe from the day he came back after wm 28. Yes he broke the streak. But who at that time did you want to beat it that you would pay money to see today??? Who is worth paying money to see today? Roman is like a joke champion that is just getting pushed to keep the company relevant. We know wwe is global, but there is, and hasn't been a legit global superstar to keep this company going since cena is the 2010s, or brock in the 2020s. Yes at the time I disagree with brock breaking the streak. But he stuck around for 10 years and used it. Finn, shinsuke, aj styles, definitely not kevin owns are getting money pouring in for ppv or wwe network. Let's just be honest with ourselves, brock made a decision to stay with the company and he was the biggest name the company could have and have made them more money then anyone other flipper they could offer. It's not cirus Olay, it's wrestling, gotta have a true badass. Brock kept his word and I guarantee you ain't buying the next bs ppv unless a name like brock is on it.
Bray Wyatt should have been the one, he has the best character work out of anyone who has ever been in the WWE, if they gave that man free leash, we would have a new unbeatable fenom.
It would have been perfect for storyline purposes if Taker faced Bray Wyatt and beat him, like he did, but Bray later returned as The Fiend and The Fiend ended the streak.
The streak wouldn't be as significant if it ended in 2005... Furthermore, the WM25 match with HBK wouldn't have happened. Maybe Taker still would've wrestled Shawn, but if you remove the streak from the context, that match wouldn't be held in high regards as it currently is
New era = Roman Reigns Old era = Kane I would even give Triple H a honorary mention BUT he was involved in too many jobber matches and belt turns that by the time WrestleMania hit fans would have had Triple H fatigue but he does put on some good matches and he was in that heavy roster that constantly fought each other. Rock doesn't make sense, Austin either (unless its the Ministry beef), Triple H is kinda a "legend killer" aka "Hunter" i.e. "The Game". Kane would be the obvious choice for story since that's his brother and equal but fans also getting Kane fatigue and he wasn't as menacing anymore after his many transformations. Brock was a safe pick, not a bad guy too lose too since he's beast but was a sloppy performance. The BEST outcome was if Sting wrestled Taker and won, but Vince won't allow his dark prince to be beaten by the WCW goth. Sting was the better of the dark characters, he had way more personality with his Crow gimmick.
The streak never should've ended. And it baffles me how people used to say it should've been Cena to end it. What sense would that have made? Lesnar and Taker had multiple feuds over the years. Kane, Triple H, and Shawn Michaels had several feuds with Taker over the years. Even Vince and Shane McMahon had several feuds with Taker. How many feuds did Cena and Taker have? Fucking 1, way back in 2003. *Update* R.I.P to Bray. Brock definitely didn't need it. Personally I still think it should have been Kane even though he didn't need it either. At that time, it should have been Bray, no offense to Roman but, he didn't deserve it then.
Roman back then would been crucified moreso than he had been at that time, and they still wouldnt make him a heel. They'd still try and force the fans to cheer him. Roman now? 100%. He's a badass, he's over as the biggest heel in the company, and the story of him being undefeated vs the streak is an obvious one. But back then it wouldn't do anything for him except add to his go away heat.
Exactly what I was thinking. That boring, awkward, suffering succotash "babyface" Roman beating the streak would have been 100x worse than Brock beating it but this evil Roman who actually puts on a good show, yeah, that's a little more acceptable.
Roman and Bray Wyatt were perfect choices to end the streak. Roman is... pretty self-explanitory, but Bray Wyatt ending the streak would've been an incredible passing of the torch moment from one supernatural character to another, and would've been incredibly special... but, alas, we live in an inferior timeline, where Brock broke the streak instead... 😭💀💀
Taker is a great guy that he will always try to do the best for the brand but honestly it either should never have been broken or only one loss to a certified legend like Cena, Edge etc.
If the shield broke up and the streak was still going … roman beating the streak then turning heel the following night … might’ve been the ideal way for the streak to end (personally don’t think it should’ve ended tho)
I lover Underwear as much as the next guy. But Ramon Noodles beating him during WeenieHut Juniors woulda made it impossible for anyone to take him seriously and not see everything as a massive push. Edit: what I'm saying is I disagree with Undy's opinion here.
I strongly disagree🤔 By the year of 2006, Kurt had accomplished everything you could possibly think of in the company. With the exception of winning a royal rumble or the newly introduced MITB ladder match. It wouldn't have really 'elevated' his career because he was already at his all time peak in 2006
Tbh out of all the ppl that the undertakers put over there's only been 5 or 6 ppl who hes lost to that ive actually been convinced by. Triple H, Batista , Kane, Big show, Brock lesnar and kurt angle. And so there's no one else who i woulda thought could break it and not recieve more hate than praise.
Not breaking the streak would have been the stupidest most retarded decision in the history of professional wrestling. Only an idiot or a idiot child would think they shouldn't have broken it. They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful. Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had something like this been built up as big as Taker's streak was. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all? Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak. And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!? I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
Roman would’ve made the better choice. If he broke the streak and immediately became the tribal chief. That would’ve made more sense of him being as dominant as he was during the tribal chief run.
Given the scenario of WrestleMania 30 , when WWE universe was rallying behind Daniel bryan and the yes movement , and the only thing matter was Daniel completing his triumphant story that night , the twist of ending the streak was a moment no one saw coming . And the decision was the right one .
Me personally I always felt like the Streak should've never been broken. That probably makes me look biased but idc....Undertaker put enuff work in over the yrs to where he deserved that distinction. Now Wrstlemania doesn't feel the same anymore to me...
Roman's had a space shuttle strapped to his back since the first time The Shield split. He did not need to be elevated by breaking the streak, especially since he's broken almost every other record at this point.
I think WWE officials were worried about Brock Lesnar losing his unstoppable credibility if he lost a second consecutive time at Wrestlemania since his return. If Brock had defeated Triple H at Wrestlemania 29 maybe they would have been more willing to let him lose the next year and give the streak to another young talent. However Triple H would also have earned three consecutive losses at Wrestlemania.
Taker is just the perfect company man for ending the streak he very easily could’ve said no Al together but he did it to elevate the next superstar. Personally bray would’ve been perfect bc their characters fit in the semi same group and it would’ve been cool to see bray champion rn but at the same point if roman would’ve ended the streak it would’ve been one hell of a match right before the beginning to his run since he’s been champion
Undertaker should’ve never lost at wrestlemania. There’s a point to doing something like that, but the dude put in 30 years unlike what anybody else will ever achieve. To get to 22 years and say screw it for Brock (all time great as well) is just odd to me, especially with Brock not being the absolute best rn. Ik they have their storylines but with Undertaker already going down as the GOAT of the industry for 90% of people who’ve seen an episode of Raw, I couldn’t have asked him to do that for somebody as established as Brock. I’ll concede Roman would make sense because they obviously want him to be the dude for rn, but the most shocking to me is that they went with Brock. No disrespect but if they were gonna have Brock Lesnar do it, why didn’t they have Cena do it? Furthermore, Cena got like 8 minutes and a fake match before Taker walked out. But also, that’s what makes me realize why Vince has 800 billion dollars and I have like 3 $20 bills on me lol
I'd rather Brock break it than the Roman we had back then. Ofc I'd rather have had neither of them break it and it be someone who A) was loved & B) needed that lil extra push. People kinda in the Rusev or Cesaro position (no, I'm not saying them, just people around that area 🤷🏼♂️)
In my opinion it makes sense for it to eventually end. If you look at the roster at the time it should’ve been Wyatt or have Roman beat him and have Roman turn heel
The streak should have never been broken at all. With hindsight now, we can see both Brock and Roman didn't really benefited with the win(Brock is already over and no one will view Brock differently even if he lost and as for Roman, well it took him until the Tribal Chief/God Mode gimmick for him to be a "top guy", which took 1-2 years after he broke the streak which made it pointless especially since they rarely acknowledge it or make it a huge deal. What they could have done is make "someone"(Roman or someone else IDK), pin Taker at Wrestlemania but not win the match by having a Iron Man/Best 2 out of 3 match. Taker would win the match but "someone" could score a point by pining Taker at Mania, which they technically could say they "beaten" Taker at Mania. They could the same finish they did at WM 27 with Triple H where Taker couldn't walk out on his own but the opponent could. That is a win win for both guy, Taker keeps the streak and that "someone" can proclaim that they pin taker at Wrestlemania which no has done before.
I still think Bray should have won their Wrestlemania match during his "New Face of Fear" gimmick. I get that meant the Undertaker would have to drop 2 Mania matches in a row but come on....its the Undertaker, hed recover. A Bray win would have definitely elevated him much sooner
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
Listening this after Bray Wyatt's death hits different😢
😢
Would have been a hilariously bad choice.
Yes he's dead. But he fucking sucked.
What????? 😯
@@JustChillin740yeah he died
@@RealMikeMiller13 I didnt know that until I read this comment. I looked it up and was very true. Used to watch wwe till 2 years ago. So thats why I was in a shock. 😥
Roman would've caused WW3 if he beat the streak
no Roman was actually well liked in 2014 it's only after that Rumble win when people started hating him.
No it should’ve been Roman let them be mad
@@khalilkaouane3700 no he meant wm 33
@@Unexpectedthings007 Well he still had Nuclear heat after that even when the streak was already done so i can only imagine how fans would react if he broke the streak at Mania 33.
Haha
Having bray wyatt break the streak would’ve actually been rather fitting. Passing the torch to new face of fear
RIP
RIP to Bray Wyatt man 💔
@@sovereignsupreme8203weird
Brock would have made more sense had he (taker) had been more of his ABA persona….. Bray would have made sense as being the new face of Darkness ….Having Roman beat the streak depends on when….. definitely NOT during this Bloodline era…..
Exactly
I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy for The Deadman.
Taker is old school, he always believed in leaving on your back. You go out putting the next generation over.
eric bishoff had to be part of it it was a WCW type of booking honestly
@@Kosten_2K I can respect him wanting to go out in that way, knowing how old school he was. What’s always bothered me is that Brock didn’t need the win, and seeing that Taker worked every Mania to follow (except 35, if my memory is correct,) there were still a few chances to honor that wish while making a new star. Instead Roman Reigns was put in an impossible position a few years later, and Bray Wyatt was sacrificed for a feud that was without its most compelling element from the jump thanks to the previous Mania.
@@gabepollock1641 ask Vince he was the main culprit for it. I also think Brock also did not want to end the streak as he is already a big star in the company and by ending the streak he will not gain anything from it. I believe in the past there were also some reports that Taker was suppose to be win but vince decide it in last minute to make Brock win it. I think if Vince is smart by using Roman to end the streak and turning him heel on raw next day, we will get one of the greatest heel earlier than the tribal chief era, but Vince with his ego still want Roman to be a face of the company by building him like super Cena at that time.
@@spritzerhijo Roman should’ve never ended the streak in less he was a heel going into the storyline of wrestlemania the way they did the wrestlemania match years after the streak was over was just terrible booking.
The Undertaker streak should have never been broken at all
It definitely shouldn’t have ended up with him losing twice. The second he lost to Brock he should’ve just retired. Them making him lose to Roman also was pathetic. And the John Cena match was embarrassing.
The WWE has to worry about building other stars up. When stone cold was big they had a problem of finding sombody to compete against him for awhile that the audience could enjoy. So they need to prop other fighters up and get as many as possible. The good ones are retiring and there will be nobody good left.
no it most definitely should've ended
@palantiri6590 stone cold built up the rock by loosing to him and the rock became the best ever.
@palantiri6590 true I'm mean to say he helped even the rock said thank you to him
He is a legend with pure heart...
Bray ending the streak would have been the ultimate passing of the torch from persona to persona.
So much respect and love. Truly though the streak should of never been broke. It is a legendary achievement to have had the streak and the perfect record for the Deadman. I do respect the fact that it did end.
Even with the streak broken, we're still talking about it.
it had to be broken, undertaker needed to retire, and he never would have been able to as long as that winstreak was up.
They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@othmaaneWRyeah but not by Lesnar aaah! I love Lesnar don't get me wrong but.......
Although the streak was ended, my kids kids will always know The Deadman, The Undertaker, has The Best Wrestlemania streak known to history!!!
Passing that torch to Brey would've been the best idea
After that, wwe would have had to book him very serious. Winning alot of matches
@@realninjaent544 I don't see the problem with that.
@@realninjaent544 yep bray wouldve been top priority and main eventing multiple wresltmenaias by now had he been the one to end the streak
Bray failed
Rip
I get it, Taker has opinion but with all due respect that streak shuda never have ended. And Taker shuda hung it up undefeated
Literally every wrestler who's been taught the very foundation of wrestling thought that the Streak was always gonna end. That's not Taker's opinion alone.
@@christiankarlkarganilla2763 the fans don't think so, and this is a sport where fans' opinion matter more so than expert opinion
@@vincentsixx5054lmao no
If u look up the interview he had about it , he said he didn’t want to end it but Vince made him
Vince never appreciated what he had in Taker
He could've easily refused to end the streak and Vince couldnt have done anything about it. It would have been a legendary achievement, but he loved WWE more than personal accomplishments. Big props to this man.
Vince made him , he said it in an interview, he was literally trying the entire week to chance his mind
@@itshouse2766when was this? Because Taker had said the ending wasn't changed until the day of the event, 4 hours before it started to be exact, and he asked Vince, if he was sure, and Vince replied, "if not him, then who", and Taker agreed after that
That's the point, he wanted it to end. Undertaker had enough pull backstage that Vince would've went with any idea he wanted, and that's why it was broken
Reigns needed that win.
Bray Wyatt deserved it .
FUCKING FACTS!!
bray would’ve been huge if they had him beat cena at wm 30 then break the streak at 31
It would’ve been better if Romain ended it
@@vato3328 Romain lettuce?
@@AidanHutchinson-wncp3po was that supposed to be funny cause is not
Of the two it should have been Bray. The narrative at the time was that Bray was the ‘new’ Undertaker and it would have cemented it. Roman was already destined for his top spot. Bray made it part of his character that he was overlooked, it’s what his second match at mania with Cena was about. Had he been the guy to break the streak it would have shot him to the moon instead of being misused for so long.
R.I.P Bray Wyatt❤
So humble person you are sir
That was actually the worst decision in WWE history
roman reigns beating him wouldn't have been better, Edge shoulld have
If tribal chief character is one to be broke the streak I will satisfied then big dog or brock
Blame Vince McMan For That Decision He Didn’t Want Brock To Leave The Company 🤔🤦🏾♂️🙅🏾♂️😠🤮🤟🏾🙌🏾💯
@@ffhhhbbfxfggggfdddffffffffEdge Has Said No Absolutely Not He Didn’t Need Too End It Because He Was Headlining Wrestlemania 😮🤷🏾♂️💯
@@ffhhhbbfxfggggfdddffffffff no, Kane should've. 100%.
Undertaker is such a professional man much respect 🫡
RIP Windham Rotunda aka Bray Wyatt
Honestly. And hear me out. It should have been Kane.
When you think of the Brothers of Destruction you think of Taker and Kane.
I think if Kane broke the streak it would have been more satisfying due to their history, and also would have elevated kanes legacy that much more.
Better script imo is,
Someone who need the win (like Mark said like Wyatt or Reigns), THEN somehow got helped by Kane to win.
This way, the winner will receive hate yet a 'higher status'. From here the rest of the story can be anything. Like, give him a redemption arc or sum and eventually fight Kane perhaps?
Idk, although they have history as BOD I don't Kane is the right guy to ended it.
They killed Kane well before that
@NamelessMist kane needed some more development
Kane ending the streak in one of the 2 matches he had with Taker would not have been as big. The streak was still very young by the 2nd time they faced off at mania. The first match Taker was 6-0 going into it and the streak wasn’t even talked about at that point in time. the second match Taker was 11-0 going into it. So no it would not have been as big of a deal as when Brock ended the 21-0 streak. Kane was already finished and buried at that point of his career. Bray Wyatt was still young(Only 25)and being booked horribly. If he had beaten Taker in Brocks place, he would’ve became bigger then he was and won more championships and main evented more Wrestlemanias.
they fucking hate Kane, so annoying 1997 Kane wipes the entire roster today
Hello my favorite hero 😀😊 I love Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar all matches thank you taker sir ❤
RIP Bray
They shouldn't have broken the streak at all, but no one will ever equal 21-0.
They definitely should have, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@duffman18 Nah, the streak should have remained unbroken.
@@duffman18No.
Well if they write it in someone will lol
No one should have ended it, the streak was legendary, definitely one of the worst decisions in wrestling history
"It should've been Bray" - NSYNC's new classic changed from "It's gonna be me."
I respect this
I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy close.
Should've given Taker the streak. He Should've gone undefeated.
Undertaker retiring with the streak in tact, would've been the greatest WWE & Wrestlemania feat of all time
He's not wrong. Brock was a top guy who got a rub he didn't need so could what? Go to SummerSlam and destroy Cena? Which he could have believably done anyway without this extra feather in his cap. It's like putting over Superman on his way to defeating Lex Luthor for the 185th time.
It def helped enhance Brock’s momentum to summerslam against cena but he def didn’t need the win
Brock carried the company for the next 10 years after it happened. Your not buying ppvs or subscription to network without brock being on it. Name on other legit star
@andrewvazquez1936 brock stayed with the company for the next 10 years! You claim all this part time shit, dude, if you watch boxing you get floyd Mayweather twice a year. Brock ruled wwe from the day he came back after wm 28. Yes he broke the streak. But who at that time did you want to beat it that you would pay money to see today??? Who is worth paying money to see today? Roman is like a joke champion that is just getting pushed to keep the company relevant. We know wwe is global, but there is, and hasn't been a legit global superstar to keep this company going since cena is the 2010s, or brock in the 2020s. Yes at the time I disagree with brock breaking the streak. But he stuck around for 10 years and used it. Finn, shinsuke, aj styles, definitely not kevin owns are getting money pouring in for ppv or wwe network. Let's just be honest with ourselves, brock made a decision to stay with the company and he was the biggest name the company could have and have made them more money then anyone other flipper they could offer. It's not cirus Olay, it's wrestling, gotta have a true badass.
Brock kept his word and I guarantee you ain't buying the next bs ppv unless a name like brock is on it.
@andrewvazquez1936 there are no megastar today
@andrewvazquez1936 so who should've broken the streak?
Mark was a true professional
Under taker still undefeated in my eyes lol
They should've let Undertaker pick the guy who beat the streak.
I wish I meet you ❤️ undertaker
Bray Wyatt should have been the one, he has the best character work out of anyone who has ever been in the WWE, if they gave that man free leash, we would have a new unbeatable fenom.
Here after, Bray Wyatt's death. He really should've been the one😢
RIP bray wyatt
It would have been perfect for storyline purposes if Taker faced Bray Wyatt and beat him, like he did, but Bray later returned as The Fiend and The Fiend ended the streak.
100%
True
It should have been Kane with both embracing and retiring that night
Bray wyatt is the wise decision and best for make dark character hype 😢🔥
I heard he wanted Randy to do it back in the Legend Killer days.
That would have been insane
The streak wouldn't be as significant if it ended in 2005...
Furthermore, the WM25 match with HBK wouldn't have happened.
Maybe Taker still would've wrestled Shawn, but if you remove the streak from the context, that match wouldn't be held in high regards as it currently is
Hey legend undertaker
New era = Roman Reigns
Old era = Kane
I would even give Triple H a honorary mention BUT he was involved in too many jobber matches and belt turns that by the time WrestleMania hit fans would have had Triple H fatigue but he does put on some good matches and he was in that heavy roster that constantly fought each other.
Rock doesn't make sense, Austin either (unless its the Ministry beef), Triple H is kinda a "legend killer" aka "Hunter" i.e. "The Game".
Kane would be the obvious choice for story since that's his brother and equal but fans also getting Kane fatigue and he wasn't as menacing anymore after his many transformations.
Brock was a safe pick, not a bad guy too lose too since he's beast but was a sloppy performance.
The BEST outcome was if Sting wrestled Taker and won, but Vince won't allow his dark prince to be beaten by the WCW goth.
Sting was the better of the dark characters, he had way more personality with his Crow gimmick.
The streak never should've ended. And it baffles me how people used to say it should've been Cena to end it. What sense would that have made? Lesnar and Taker had multiple feuds over the years. Kane, Triple H, and Shawn Michaels had several feuds with Taker over the years. Even Vince and Shane McMahon had several feuds with Taker. How many feuds did Cena and Taker have? Fucking 1, way back in 2003.
*Update* R.I.P to Bray. Brock definitely didn't need it. Personally I still think it should have been Kane even though he didn't need it either. At that time, it should have been Bray, no offense to Roman but, he didn't deserve it then.
Rest in peace bray wyatt
Roman back then would been crucified moreso than he had been at that time, and they still wouldnt make him a heel. They'd still try and force the fans to cheer him. Roman now? 100%. He's a badass, he's over as the biggest heel in the company, and the story of him being undefeated vs the streak is an obvious one. But back then it wouldn't do anything for him except add to his go away heat.
Exactly what I was thinking. That boring, awkward, suffering succotash "babyface" Roman beating the streak would have been 100x worse than Brock beating it but this evil Roman who actually puts on a good show, yeah, that's a little more acceptable.
Roman and Bray Wyatt were perfect choices to end the streak. Roman is... pretty self-explanitory, but Bray Wyatt ending the streak would've been an incredible passing of the torch moment from one supernatural character to another, and would've been incredibly special... but, alas, we live in an inferior timeline, where Brock broke the streak instead... 😭💀💀
The streak should’ve never ended.
Rest in power Bray wyatt/the fiend/windham we will never forget you heavens gate LET HiM iN
Coming back to watch this hits different now that Bray is no longer with us.
Taker is a great guy that he will always try to do the best for the brand but honestly it either should never have been broken or only one loss to a certified legend like Cena, Edge etc.
Undertaker Your voice has really changed. 😂😂😂😂😂
"Bray Wyatt, he's going to go to that next level"
*Vince McMahon music hits*
The Fiend ending the streak and retiring Taker would’ve been a crazy passing the torch moment.
Your 100% right undertaker
If the shield broke up and the streak was still going … roman beating the streak then turning heel the following night … might’ve been the ideal way for the streak to end (personally don’t think it should’ve ended tho)
Nobody should of to be fair I think Taker is being modest here, deep down that should of been kept safe and unbroken
Love that he’s only upset that the opportunity to put someone over was wasted.
I lover Underwear as much as the next guy.
But Ramon Noodles beating him during WeenieHut Juniors woulda made it impossible for anyone to take him seriously and not see everything as a massive push.
Edit: what I'm saying is I disagree with Undy's opinion here.
I’d still think Kurt Angle should have ended the streak back in 2006
This would have been the case if it weren’t for Eddie Guerrero’s tragic passing
I strongly disagree🤔
By the year of 2006, Kurt had accomplished everything you could possibly think of in the company.
With the exception of winning a royal rumble or the newly introduced MITB ladder match.
It wouldn't have really 'elevated' his career because he was already at his all time peak in 2006
It didn't need to be broken. Nobody has become bigger than the streak amongst wrestling fans.
Tbh out of all the ppl that the undertakers put over there's only been 5 or 6 ppl who hes lost to that ive actually been convinced by. Triple H, Batista , Kane, Big show, Brock lesnar and kurt angle. And so there's no one else who i woulda thought could break it and not recieve more hate than praise.
The first mistake wwe made is breaking taker streak
Not breaking the streak would have been the stupidest most retarded decision in the history of professional wrestling. Only an idiot or a idiot child would think they shouldn't have broken it. They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had something like this been built up as big as Taker's streak was. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@duffman18not to mention, Undertaker himself was all for it being broken
@@duffman18Lol do you work for them. Or are you Mr. Mcman.
One of the worst mistakes Vince has ever made. Interesting he mentions Bray, there is a lot of respect for Bray as we saw at RAW
I said the same thing bro .. RIP bray
Roman would’ve made the better choice. If he broke the streak and immediately became the tribal chief. That would’ve made more sense of him being as dominant as he was during the tribal chief run.
Definitely bray RIP😭
I think Kane tbh
But Kane is his storyline brother though, it couldn't be Kane.
In all honesty John Cena in his prime with all the hype should have been the guy to do it. If not go undefeated
Bray shouldve done it!
whatever
but you are a legend.
I'll say it EVERYTIME , it should've been Kane, and it should've been Taker's last wm...... A perfect ending to the storyline.
Roman 2020(beginning of bloodline) should have do that
In my opinion it should have been Shawn Michaels in one of those matches they had at wrestlemania in 09’-10’
Given the scenario of WrestleMania 30 , when WWE universe was rallying behind Daniel bryan and the yes movement , and the only thing matter was Daniel completing his triumphant story that night , the twist of ending the streak was a moment no one saw coming . And the decision was the right one .
Dam. Rest in peace bray Wyatt. I stopped watching wwe a long time ago maybe like 2020 cause shit was just getting wack but bray went hardd
EAT..SLEEP..CONQUER....THE STREAK 😎🌪
Me personally I always felt like the Streak should've never been broken. That probably makes me look biased but idc....Undertaker put enuff work in over the yrs to where he deserved that distinction. Now Wrstlemania doesn't feel the same anymore to me...
Still think if it had to be anyone it should've been Shawn, in the return match.
I completely agree
Imo bray, he was set to become the next "undertaker" and had he beaten the streak that would've cemented it.
Roman's had a space shuttle strapped to his back since the first time The Shield split. He did not need to be elevated by breaking the streak, especially since he's broken almost every other record at this point.
I think WWE officials were worried about Brock Lesnar losing his unstoppable credibility if he lost a second consecutive time at Wrestlemania since his return.
If Brock had defeated Triple H at Wrestlemania 29 maybe they would have been more willing to let him lose the next year and give the streak to another young talent.
However Triple H would also have earned three consecutive losses at Wrestlemania.
Undertaker predicted Roman’s success this is why he’s the best wrestler period
I'd say kane deserved it the most .
Taker is just the perfect company man for ending the streak he very easily could’ve said no Al together but he did it to elevate the next superstar. Personally bray would’ve been perfect bc their characters fit in the semi same group and it would’ve been cool to see bray champion rn but at the same point if roman would’ve ended the streak it would’ve been one hell of a match right before the beginning to his run since he’s been champion
Undertaker should’ve never lost at wrestlemania. There’s a point to doing something like that, but the dude put in 30 years unlike what anybody else will ever achieve. To get to 22 years and say screw it for Brock (all time great as well) is just odd to me, especially with Brock not being the absolute best rn. Ik they have their storylines but with Undertaker already going down as the GOAT of the industry for 90% of people who’ve seen an episode of Raw, I couldn’t have asked him to do that for somebody as established as Brock. I’ll concede Roman would make sense because they obviously want him to be the dude for rn, but the most shocking to me is that they went with Brock. No disrespect but if they were gonna have Brock Lesnar do it, why didn’t they have Cena do it? Furthermore, Cena got like 8 minutes and a fake match before Taker walked out.
But also, that’s what makes me realize why Vince has 800 billion dollars and I have like 3 $20 bills on me lol
I'd rather Brock break it than the Roman we had back then. Ofc I'd rather have had neither of them break it and it be someone who A) was loved & B) needed that lil extra push. People kinda in the Rusev or Cesaro position (no, I'm not saying them, just people around that area 🤷🏼♂️)
My point exactly! The streak ending wasn't the problem, but Lesnar totally wasn't the right man to do it.
Would love if it was actually Bray Wyatt. The next one to maintain the fear factor in WWE, he needed it
The Streak should have never ended. Period.
In my opinion it makes sense for it to eventually end. If you look at the roster at the time it should’ve been Wyatt or have Roman beat him and have Roman turn heel
Imagine the shit Roman would talk. “Man I’ve been holding this belt for 4 years and ended the undertaker. Shawn Michaels had 2 tries and still failed”
U the g.o.a.t man
The streak should have never been broken at all. With hindsight now, we can see both Brock and Roman didn't really benefited with the win(Brock is already over and no one will view Brock differently even if he lost and as for Roman, well it took him until the Tribal Chief/God Mode gimmick for him to be a "top guy", which took 1-2 years after he broke the streak which made it pointless especially since they rarely acknowledge it or make it a huge deal.
What they could have done is make "someone"(Roman or someone else IDK), pin Taker at Wrestlemania but not win the match by having a Iron Man/Best 2 out of 3 match. Taker would win the match but "someone" could score a point by pining Taker at Mania, which they technically could say they "beaten" Taker at Mania. They could the same finish they did at WM 27 with Triple H where Taker couldn't walk out on his own but the opponent could. That is a win win for both guy, Taker keeps the streak and that "someone" can proclaim that they pin taker at Wrestlemania which no has done before.
The streak ending is what broke my watching wrestling streak :v
Legend 👍👍👍
Rip Bray Wyatt
I still think Bray should have won their Wrestlemania match during his "New Face of Fear" gimmick. I get that meant the Undertaker would have to drop 2 Mania matches in a row but come on....its the Undertaker, hed recover. A Bray win would have definitely elevated him much sooner
I’ve heard multiple superstars saying Roman it’s like they saw something that the fans didn’t
I think Roman should’ve beat the streak then started this Tribal Chief Gimmick back then.
Everyone would’ve hated Roman even more than they already did. Bad idea. Might as well be the ncaa, ufc and wwe champion to do it.