So essentially if I understand correctly that to be impartial would require material facts. Wouldn’t material facts involve natural law? Circumstantial evidence isn’t real evidence compared to direct evidence. They would also need first hand knowledge of the matter since an artificial person can’t observe reality and doesn’t have the perception of a human being. Also, a collective body doesn’t have first hand knowledge, it’s an impossibility.
So essentially if I understand correctly that to be impartial would require material facts. Wouldn’t material facts involve natural law? Circumstantial evidence isn’t real evidence compared to direct evidence. They would also need first hand knowledge of the matter since an artificial person can’t observe reality and doesn’t have the perception of a human being. Also, a collective body doesn’t have first hand knowledge, it’s an impossibility.
Hi sir, may i know what book do you use ? 🥺
store.lexisnexis.ca/en/categories/shop-by-jurisdiction/federal-13/canadian-administrative-law-3rd-edition-student-edition-skusku-cad-00748/details
But since game theory involves business strategy, doesn’t that make it bias? Essentially it’s a zero sum game.