2019 8 Core iMac vs iMac Pro- Same Performance, Half the Price?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 เม.ย. 2019
- Here is our comparison between the 2019 8-core 5K 27-Inch iMac vs the base iMac Pro.
More info on 2019 8-Core iMac:
bhpho.to/2IfZFYv
Ram Upgrade on iMac:
amzn.to/2Ddrpc7
Follow Me on Twitter bit.ly/PKP8jD
Like us on our Facebook Page on. HJ - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Great video...thank you for a decent comparison....one of the best I have seen...I appreciate your time in producing this...you did a great job...but I'm probably going with the Pro...for two reasons...more ports..and the stand can be removed so I can use a VESA mount. I do have a question for you...the studio monitors on your desk...do you have a link to those? I have some JVC monitors...but they are powered and BIG...have been looking for something smaller. You seem to have them :) .
Thanks again for your video.
hi MW ..now nearly a year later..has there been any over heating issues with the 8 Core option in the iMac 5K
Wish you would of done a H.265 export comparison!
You have been so helpful. Listening to what you are saying. Should I consider the iMac 5k since it has to handle music production with logic pro and final cut pro X to make videos. Then I will be using it to live stream since it has more ports available. What configurations are more necessary to do the tasks. There is a choice between i5 or i9: comes with 8gb memory (32 GB is an additional 750: CAD) May not need the Vega graphics comes with Radeon Pro 580X : Comes with 2TB fusion drive storage. or 1TD SSD storage is $375 CAD) What's over kill and what's necessary to handle my tasks?
Awesome comparison! What RAM and graphics card do you recommend?
How is gonna cost with the extra upgrades to the iMac 2019 ? Is gonna be almost the same price? You didn’t mentioned the price for the external ssd and external GPU card? Thanks for the info though
That fusion drive speed benchmark... it's basically smoke and mirrors. Its real speed goes down to about 150MB/s at best.
So if you're adding memory yourself, you can get up to 64gb, that's killer, but what about upgrading the SSD Drive, do they make that pretty possible? The other thing I'm having trouble understanding is that getting a 3TB Fusion over a 2TB Fusion is only $120 , but if you just choose a 2TB regular SSD(not fusion) it's +$840. So what's the differences/pro's/con's if one got for example a 2TB fusion SSD over a 2TB SSD(non fusion) ? I kinda just assumed Fusion would be better?
Thankyou. 🙌🙌
Thanks brother.🇬🇾
So, I’m an Italian who don’t understand and don’t speak English very well and.. at the end wich is the best buy between iMac and the iMac Pro?
(I mean for someone who edit video with final cut)
L'imac 2019 costa molto meno e ha le stesse performance perché il Pro è un modello vecchio
You helped me a lot, thanks man!
Wish they released a grey iMac.
It’s a light grey 🤪
It is gray...
They have skins out there you can put on that look very nice.
building a spec out pc is cheap but building a spec out pc and buying a ultra wide 5k display monitor is painful
i want to know 2019 imac 5K 27” can be updated the ram by myself?
Yes
Only 27” not 21.5”
thank you for your comments
@@jobswong9247 Easy peasy, hatch in back of 27" opens and you pop the RAM in. Way faster than on a PC.
Yes absolutely brother
It is a very good comparison. It tells us that iMac will be more worthy than the pro in terms of hours light video editing tasks. However, I think pro has something that makes it not be replaced by iMac. That is the stability of long term computing. For heavy rendering for days or intense scientific simulation in a Mac, the pro is the only option.
I’m more excited for the 31.6” iMac. Or at least the standalone display then hopefully a more powerful Mac mini.
Lol in my country it is just 500$ cheaper than the iMac Pro
The iMac Pro is obviously far superior, way better graphics with HBM2 memory which totally destroys the standard iMac, way faster SSD, more reliable ECC RAM, T2 chip, better cooling system, more I/O ports, Ethernet 10Gb, the list goes on. Yes, the iMac Pro is more expensive but its a professional workstation grade machine, its actually fairly priced.
Got a refurbished iMac Pro, this thing rocks, already had a eGPU setup with it and this thing slays raw video files
“Way better graphics”?? Both have HBM2 memory and 8GB of Vram. Vega 48 and 58 are not so different. The Core i9 9900k is better at many tasks than the 8-Core Xeon on the iMac Pro. “Way faster SSD” ?? The SSD is the same across all Apple’s devices
FBI firstly the $2500 isn’t spec’ed with the Vega 48 as far as I know and second the ssd is way different you have no clue what you’re talking about. Apple uses two nvme drives in raid 0 on the pro
@@ryannovak5911 But that still doesn't defend the huge price difference IMO... the advanced cooling system is clearly made for the 10+ core versions..you won't see much of a heat difference with 8 cores. The difference in SSD is only noticeable in write speed, the more important read speed is the same. The iMac i9 is simply way more bang for your buck than the Mac Pro...
Remember the steam machine XD
After all those add ons you’re talking about you aren’t going to be several thousand under the iMac Pro. You’re not even several thousand under with the current setups.
and that shit with monitor costs 10000+$ and basically give you the performance or lower what now you can get from 2500$ PC especially now when r9 3900x ryzen are out
fusion drive? comon everyone use ssd now.
Once they trim the huge bezels this will be a 32" machine.
I wish they would, but I worry they won't because they don't want to encroach on the new 32" pro display size...What do you think?
@@adam9936 they will on both the imac and imac pro.
T2 chip? H256 encoding?
more like forcing you to get repairs done only at apple and internal ssd upgrades locked only to apple at time of purchase.
So 5 years from now you want a 4tb ssd inside as prices fall, to bad the t2 chip forbids that.
Intel chips can do many of the encoding things better than the t2 chips anyway.
@@Tigerex966 So because the t2 chip is slower than the intel, they took the time to develop it? Regardless if the repairs are forced to be done by specific companies, I always would repair my Macs at apple, because if they break it, they have to fix it, they won't steal your data, they will only use original parts... Why, even if the SSD could be swapped, would you take the time to put it in your pc? TB3 is fast enough to use external SSDs. And have you even though about why the T2 chip was made? To stop the possibility for hackers to analyze MacOS for their hacks. If they just wanted to generate money with it, they would have build it in much quicker.
@@kuchenzwiebel7147 the T2 chip is garbage the programing is horrible and often leads to kernel panics... The problem is power management is done buy the T2 chip and it's horrible at it. Normally Intel cpus would do it them self but because only Apple does it this way bridge os chrashes when chip wants go faster but the T2 is not keeping up . A 2019 imac is a better option few years down the road you can buy a.new imac that is way faster then the imac pro. We do see that final cut and Vegas pro work more an more with the video cards and premiere is getting real slow because they don't support things like new Navi encoders on de new amd cards or the afterburner...
@@cheezy2455 Best argument yet. You can by two imacs for 1 imac pro after ticking options on both. Probably get a little trade in value too. This settles it for me. Thanks!
Nice reviews -- too bad apple for into the intel Xeon trap. I wish Apple would use the AMD Ryzen cpus. Also the laptops look nice but I don't want SSD, everyone I know had issues after 3 years. I have spinning drive for 12+ years.
Tnx for the review.
PC from Apple? Never heard that before. When did Apple build a PC? It's Mac, no PC.
PC means personal computer
Mobolaji Ahmed most folks use the term “pc” when referring to a non-Mac.
I don’t know anyone who uses external speakers with iMacs- not sure why, but most people will use internal speakers.
What does this all mean..English
It means standard imac is way cheaper and pretty darn good.
9900k with 8gb ram and a hybrid drive? If you want to make something that unbalanced, you can build a pc with those specs for almost $1000 less
This video for imac because of the software .. mac > win 10
For productivity and professional use
Yeah good luck pulling that off after buying a 5k 27” monitor to go with it.
Show as the ACTUAL cost of building " a pc with those specs for almost $1000 less"
Including Windows 10 Pro (you are not just stealing it?), all the other software that comes with macOS, and the 5k screen with ALL the costs, delivery, warranty, support and charges,
...not just some arm waving: "...not much extra".
As much as I think Apple is overcharging for their current hardware, which I agree is unbalanced, overheats and is practically unrepairable, I can not find any major savings building my own.
And excuse me, I wasn't born yesterday, a pile of parts delivered from dozens of suppliers is not a fully assembled computer that works out of the box in minutes, and has virtually lifetime support.
Don't give me assembling a PC is a piece of cake and takes no-time at all, because I can't get someone to do all the leg work for me and assemble it for nothing. Weirdly they want to get paid.
btw A fusion drive is not bad, it is almost as fast as SSD and has massively more capacity. Most PC builds include a regular HDD for that very reason.
Macintosh. For People who last used a Windows PC when XP was new...Price vs Processing Power PC wins everytime
I’m only using MacOS because of the many crashes when using blender or UE4 and the way too frequent updates on Windows 10. Windows 7 was PERFECT 👌🏻, but Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 kinda ruined it for me.
I use both UE and Blender on Win10. What the hell are you talking about?
@@justincowgill8875 As someone who uses both MacOS (work) and Windows 10 (home), the only real benefits MacOS has is that it's more aesthetically pleasing, Finder is superior to Windows Explorer and battery management is better if you're mobile. Crashes happen on both systems, more often on MacOS for me. MacOS also has very frequent updates (which is good, because it's for security!) Windows has much better window management, hardware compatibility, and is considerably cheaper among many other positives.
I don't hate on people for prefering one system or the other, I enjoy both ecosystems. But I also don't support claims about superiority of one over the other. They're simply different
@@Balomis I also have Macs and PCs and if you can't tell the differences beyond what you described you know neither well.
@@peterbreis5407 Ah yes, because a brief comment explaining a few of my preferences for each OS in question is actually my Magnum Opus featuring every last detail of my operating system knowledge and experience 👍
Lol either way your getting robbed
I feel your pain and would agree with you about almost every Apple product...except for the fact that for the first time in a long while, we are actually robbing Apple here on this iMac. You could not build a comparable Windows machine for the equivalent price with this hardware IF you factor in a 5K screen that would cost almost $2000 alone if you wanted a 5K screen comparable to the quality of this monitor. I know you can get a 5K monitor for less than $2000 but not all 5K monitors produce the same quality images. For once, we get a win on this one.
KGS Fitness just made a build on pc part picker with the 400$ 64gb Corsair ram that’s at 4000mhz a 1tb ssd a 3gb hdd a 2080 the nzxth500 a gold 750w powersupply a 9700k I9 a z390 oc capable motherboard and the h100i liquid aio for about 2,400 at the max and if your only an editor take the gpu out and then you have almost an extra 1,000 for a xeon cpu or more ram apple will always be a rip off
Also there’s a 4K monitor reviewed by Linus for 180$ that’s not that bad
@@garnet.4664 What about the rest? That list is not a finished complete computer. Unless you think staring at a case with assorted hardware inside comprises computing.
It is no more an iMac than a box of flour, bag of sugar, couple of eggs and a bottle of milk is a cake.
Pancake ingredients don't make a Sachertorte, just because you can't tell the difference.
Peter Breis well if u can buy a iMac I’m pretty sure you have a desk or table also apple’s keyboard and mice I would guess cost almost nothing so a 30$ kbm would still be better