Not when the engine is stressed member, one of the reasons why Aston Martin's AMR1 failed, Inline 6's are TERRIBLE as structural members, so for this application, a V6 would be better.
Not in this application. They wanted to get the weight of the engine as far back and as low to the ground as possible. An in-line 6 is much longer, so the weight of it would negatively affect how the car handles
![[TH] Esports World Cup : Point Rush Stage](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eLU-jnYp3Zs/mqdefault.jpg)
The paintjob is absolutely amazing !!
No words describes this one day we will buy this car for 5 millions
5:09 I need a girl that looks at a 190 EVO with a smile like that
And they will sell it for over $1 million 🤣🤣
Easily and owner will sell it with. Aprofit thats the way it works 😎
Cool car, but almost as much as a EVO II
Twice as much as evo 2
I6 > V6
Not when the engine is stressed member, one of the reasons why Aston Martin's AMR1 failed, Inline 6's are TERRIBLE as structural members, so for this application, a V6 would be better.
Not in this application. They wanted to get the weight of the engine as far back and as low to the ground as possible. An in-line 6 is much longer, so the weight of it would negatively affect how the car handles
@@trevorrose4529 Specially the CoG of the car, a smaller longitudinal package means better weight distribution, therefore a lower CoG.