I Never Thought I Would See This Again

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
  • Carlos Alcaraz coming fresh off back to back Wimbledons has been causing some debate between him and Rafael Nadal. Over this video I’m going to compare them at the age of 21 and see if this is really a debate.
    Make sure you like comment and subscribe for more content like this!

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @brendajohnson5525
    @brendajohnson5525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We are seeing the one and only Carlos Alcaraz whose best surface is them all.

  • @pauljohnson6019
    @pauljohnson6019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nobody knows the future for sure, but if Alcaraz remains injury free, he could dominate tennis for the next 15+ years, and have over 30 slams.

  • @elviastoute7319
    @elviastoute7319 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alcaraz and Nadal are Spanish, otherwise each is their own player.

  • @hristijandimitrovski8664
    @hristijandimitrovski8664 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alcaraz doesn't have 1 Wimbledon title, he has 2. So he has 4 grand slams at age of 21 comparing ti Nadal's 3 (all at Roland Garros) and Alcaraz has year where he ended as number 1 player while Nadal hadn't something similar at that age. You need to understand that he beat Djokovic 2 times in finals at Wimbledon and Djokovic hasn't lost at Wimbledon for 10 year before Alcaraz beat him last 2 years soo you should respect that a lot more. Federer never beat Novak in the finals at Wimbledon while Novak defeated him 3 times. I've never seen honestly more perfect match than Alcaraz's finals against Novak at Wimbledon. The man simply played perfect tennis, perfect tennis without making any mistakes at all. All that combining with his crazy serving, his extremely hard, but accurate hits, with his ridiculous defense, athleticism out of this world... Honestly I don't think that even prime Federer would beat 2024 Wimbledon Alkaraz. He is simply faster than Federer and despite Federer being phenomenal offensive player, Alcaraz was phenomenal offensive and defensive player at Wimbledon finals this year and I didn't see any weakness in his game. I've never seen Djokovic being soo inferior at Wimbledon like Alkaraz made him to be this year. And the fact that he plays great at any tour, hasn't weak surface... Yeah, he is definitely better than Nadak and clearly the greatest 21 old player we've ever seen in this sport.