@@BravoSixGoingDark Temperature does not equal to higher wattage on x3D cpu's. They just suck at transferring the heat to the IHS. We'll see if 9800x3D's new cache location gonna fix it or not.
@@kevinyoliveira68 I had a 3060 and am considering either a 7800xt or a 4070, leaning towards the 4070 bc ones on sale rn. Am pairing it with a 7700x for competitive gaming at 360hz. I like to have tipple a titles available at 1440p ultra graphics but comp games are my main games.
So intel’s newest 7 series can’t even beat AMD’s last gen 7 series. Oh and the Ryzen chip is using 10-15% less power to get 10-15% better performance. Yikes
@@saricubra2867 Remember when people were defending those craptastic AM3+ CPUs. Dual Core i3's at the time were getting better performance than even the 9590. How the turn tables.
In gaming yeah, gets walked all over in everything else. 9800X3d will is the real threat, it'll probably surpass Intel in both productivity & gaming given its new cache/core layout and overclocking potential.
@@m.devellisThe FX9590 isn't that bad compared to those i3s because it has 8 threads. It's only when you compare it against the i7s when it's extremely bad. Meanwhile what real advantage an Ultra 9 285K has over anything?
@@SwingArmCity The moment Intel decided to place the memory controller ouside of the CPU cores themselves (and changed the P/E core layout) they screwed up the IPC. Meteor Lake did it first, so is not totally a Bulldozer/Piledriver moment but there are similarities.
You are wrong , after a point the FPS matters shit what does it matter if you have 300 vs 400 are you stupid or what ? Do you have a 360hz monitor ? I was actually surprised how well did Intel I was expecting a bigger difference, I will buy the intel , cheaper and I can do more things than just gaming
@@goregejones7248 A CRT at 75Hz feels better than those "gaming monitors" from personal experience. Refreshrate is kinda irrelevant if the pixel response time is not 0.
intel spend 300mln on diversity projects instead of investing in uv lithography, intel ceo was busy doing romances with co-workers, they waste 10 years when they had an advantage over amd ....
@@Solamnic Let your eyes look straight ahead; fix your gaze directly before you. Give careful thought to the paths for your feet and be steadfast in all your ways ....
they are more likely counting down the time till they have there own stacked cache developed. With cudimms and there stacked cache coming its amd who should be worried
@@terryohare7049well they better hurry before they have to fire more people and sell the company huh 🤔. Intel has had now what 5 years to make a comeback and it’s just gotten worse.
@@terryohare7049amd will have even more mature 3D cache. They are multiple years ahead of Intel in that technology. Also Intel will not be able to continue operating for more than 2 years at this level of losses.
God a the 9800x3d is coming. And it’s not confirmed yet, but it might not be the fastest for gaming of the x3D chips anymore if the larger chips boost higher and all cores have v cache.
Ryzen 7800X3D is 2022 product and 9800X3D will be 10 % better than 7800X3D.I am not sure if I buy 9800X3D or 9900X3D but I certainly won't buy intel cpu.
I have a 7800X3D so I am all for this.... However. I (like most people) don't play at 1080p, so these comparison videos are getting to be a little pointless. Yes, I understand this is showing CPU power/bottleneck and you need 1080p to do that, but in the real world for those who play at 1440p and 4K, the fps difference is very little. So for someone who plays at 4K and also uses their PC for productivity, the Core Ultra series would actually be the better option... And finally... anyone who buys a Core Ultra CPU, ain't going to be playing games at 1080p.
@@catfacecat. Very true. But you are completely missing my point. I could confidently say professional/competitive e-sports gamers who watch these comparison videos compared to the average PC gamer/enthusiast who watch these comparison videos would probably be a ratio of something like 1:500. The point I am making is.... A large proportion (most likely the majority) of people who watch these videos are not using 1080p as a resolution, whether it be gaming or productivity. And I personally would rather see these comparisons at more than just 1080p.
@@thornstrikesback that's fair, but they compare at 1080p to show the diffrence. but even then i sometimes get bottlenecked by my 7800x3d at 1440p. gpu is 4080S. as for productivity you could say 14900k is the best for both at the same time, but 7950x3d is doing pretty good too. plus amds 9900x3d and 9950x3d claims to fix the dual CCD issue. so faster than 9800x3d possibly.
Any chance you've got a I9-9900k still laying around. I want to upgrade my PC but want to see if the Ultra 9 Processor 285K is really that much better than my 9900k. I'm running a RTX4090
Intel 265k has the exact same price range here in my country with 7900X3D. Can you please compare them in the next video? I know the double CCD on the 7900X3D may not be as good as the 7800X3D. Thanks in advance.
It would be great if they did that, but they silently worsened some things in their new processors, such as latency, stability, support for high performance peripherals.
@Hakaluk_BENCHMARK i might just skip it and wait honestly I don't think it will be worth it over 7800x3d my opinion of course I will check benchmarks though
Most ridiculous is that intel already had Broadwell with l4 128mb l4 cache in 2015. Which performed equally to next skylake generation despite having ddr3 ram, and lower core frequency. Why not use l4 cache once again, to compete with 3d cache of amd?
@@sutapachakraborty9337 Counter Strike 2 still refuses to use all of my 20 threads on my 12700K just like CSGO. Doesn't count, that game is broken on Intel.
@@saricubra2867 Not everything can be split among especially 20 threads..... there are limits to programming... You don't even need more thread usage. CS2 runs at 700fps
besides the fact that amd is better, I see a potential issue with the 7800x3d: it seems that the 8c/16thr is a bit of a bottle neck for some games. When you have above 70% cpu usage and the gpu is at 85% usage that may be a problem in the future :)... I'm not complaining all that much because I am going to buy the 9800x3d this week (or when it will arrive at my local stores) but it still may be something to consider.
Intel temperatures actually impressive. The tests are correct and everything good about this video, but don't forget it is not realistic scenario of using the CPU. Realistic scenario would be at least 2560x1440 screen resolution. Since its RTX 4090 then 4K minimum
@@Jason_Bover9000 no, the 9800xd is releasing on the 7th. The poster was talking about non-gaming workloads which is something the 9950x3D would be very good at as well as being excellent at gaming, it should be coming out in early 2025
@@ravere1314 I hope that it's all X3D cache on both CCDs. I heared people would rather have an i9-13900K or a 14900K over a 7950X3D due to the scheduling problems.
ultra 200 series are a bit like ZEN 1 vs kaby lake... its a way stronger CPU for compute but suffer from latency so its bad for gaming. but the price is not good as the price of ZEN 1 was. but there is one important thing to note, non of them will actually limit u in gaming at 4K with 4080/4090, if the 5090 will be nuts u might see some limitation in some games. i think that intel must lower the price and start to work on her "zen 2" moment when a long term plan come together.
@@fdgdfgdfgdfg3811 that is way the ZEN 1 was interesting and refreshing even if not for every one... and the U 200 is just boring. intel have a " we are the best and we will sell any thing any time" mind set, the problem is that they lost it years ago.
5:55 - looks like Intel Ultra 200 can handle better with Unreal 4-5 engine stutters, even if average fps is lover. Please test Silent Hill 2 aka Stutter Hill
Someone need to do a test when intel having like 7000mhz ram because it's easy cappable of. Difference might be lower, even tho the new 9800X3D is coming and it will have better memory controller so we will see how much of MHz ram it will run stable.
Do the same benchmark in 2k and 4k please, and btw I was expecting 9800x3D to crush intel 265k way harder considering the intel 100-120 pounds less, and for the AMD fanboys , yes you can't contest 9800x3D is better but in those benchmarks where it had 100+ fps over intel , my friends , nobody who is sane cares if his game plays in 350 fps or 450 fps just saying , plus intel was colder , so that means gold for OC amateurs. imo big W intel with the price of this CPU. I was thinking to buy 9800X3D but for this difference not worth the extra money plus CUDIMM is around the corner
This intel might be good 100$ cheaper, in some games near same performance it means it has the potential Som guys got way better fps by disabling some cores
it's sometimes difficult to justify the CPU for streaming, because the streamer could use Nvidia's NVENC encoder instead. But this depends on the streamer's preferences too. Some people don't like the NVENC encoder. If this is the case though and the streamer wants to use the CPU, then 16x E-Cores are better for streaming. Also, Intel's iGPU could also be used for streaming.
@ Not this time. Why? Intel has a new litography and core desigment, and now, 285K is 5-15% slower than 14900K but it uses half wattage and it’s 30 degrees cooler. Intel needs to put on the market a U5 255K, U7 275K and U9 295K for be competitive with AMD. AMD has no rivals right now with 7800X3D, and it’s releasing a 9800X3D
Yea i think this isn't a fair comparison when it come to memory speed, AMD is if i'm correct working in gear 1 with 6000mhz, while intel is in gear 2 which gives it higher memory latency, a more fair comparing would be intel with something like 8800mhz pushing the gear 2. Not that it would matter the 7800x3D would still win, but the gap would be a little smaller :)
I have a 7800X3D. But what I see in these Ultras is that they weren't made for games. Keep in mind that it's a new design, a new architecture, if it's something for the future, only Intel knows, but at least it's not like AMD where the only thing they delivered was a reboot of the last generation. Let's see what the future will say.
Games :
Forza Horizon 5 - 0:00
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:03
Starfield - 2:06
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 - 3:08
PUBG - 4:06
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:07
Star Wars Outlaws - 6:13
CS2 - 7:11
Ghost of Tsushima - 8:12
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 9:16
System:
Windows 11
Core Ultra 7 265K - bit.ly/3C4ZE75
MSI MAG Z890 TOMAHAWK - bit.ly/3NFmC7a
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
RAM 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL30 - bit.ly/4e3MqEG
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj
Ryzen 7 7800X3D Pubg 400fps good
and Ryzen still consumes less energy
But idles very hot and even using simple things like browsing the net or streaming a movie, temps go up.
@@BravoSixGoingDark Obviously they have different cooling. I personally saw how in 4k 7800x3d it showed less than 60
@BravoSixGoingDark literally like any CPU, don't expect browsing to not make a load on your CPU
@@BravoSixGoingDark Temperature does not equal to higher wattage on x3D cpu's. They just suck at transferring the heat to the IHS. We'll see if 9800x3D's new cache location gonna fix it or not.
Except amd can't even beat itself and the amd cpu is almost 100$ more. It will also lose support faster because it's older.
4:16 295 vs 403 FPS 😱😱 108FPS difference
Because Intel now sucks
Yes, I sold my rtx and i7 and am getting an amd pc
@@kylehanes5702 Nah RTX still better and CPUs Intel sucks in gaming
@@kevinyoliveira68 I had a 3060 and am considering either a 7800xt or a 4070, leaning towards the 4070 bc ones on sale rn. Am pairing it with a 7700x for competitive gaming at 360hz. I like to have tipple a titles available at 1440p ultra graphics but comp games are my main games.
@@kylehanes5702 go with the 4070 super
So intel’s newest 7 series can’t even beat AMD’s last gen 7 series. Oh and the Ryzen chip is using 10-15% less power to get 10-15% better performance. Yikes
Intel Piledriver (Bulldozer is Meteor Lake).
@@saricubra2867 Remember when people were defending those craptastic AM3+ CPUs. Dual Core i3's at the time were getting better performance than even the 9590. How the turn tables.
In gaming yeah, gets walked all over in everything else. 9800X3d will is the real threat, it'll probably surpass Intel in both productivity & gaming given its new cache/core layout and overclocking potential.
@@m.devellisThe FX9590 isn't that bad compared to those i3s because it has 8 threads. It's only when you compare it against the i7s when it's extremely bad.
Meanwhile what real advantage an Ultra 9 285K has over anything?
@@BNR_248*9950x3d🗿
Intel is evolving, just backwards 😂
That’s called devolving
And it’s something I never expected to see on Intel already
Ultra 5 is actually 3. 7 is 5 and and 9 is 7. Intel is pranking us.
with CUDIMM RAM'kit the ultra 9 core 285 is in gaming 1:1 Equal the 7800 x3d intel go his own way of x3d intel did it better as always
@@DarkSoul45456 Only in some games. It still loses in the majority. Plus, with the 9800X3D AMD will remain on top.
What about productivity 😂 Intel clearly dominant
7800X3D Gold medal again 🥇
Surprised? I'm not. Wait for the 9800x3d
@@SwingArmCity The moment Intel decided to place the memory controller ouside of the CPU cores themselves (and changed the P/E core layout) they screwed up the IPC. Meteor Lake did it first, so is not totally a Bulldozer/Piledriver moment but there are similarities.
Murder in frames, watts and price.🥴😵😵💫
Not in price. The 265k has double multithread performance and is cheaper. If youre not only gamer, than clearly it gives better value.
@@Met1900 its also dogshit?
@@johndenielescuro-modular8320 🤣what a jokerboy you are
You are wrong , after a point the FPS matters shit what does it matter if you have 300 vs 400 are you stupid or what ? Do you have a 360hz monitor ? I was actually surprised how well did Intel I was expecting a bigger difference, I will buy the intel , cheaper and I can do more things than just gaming
Ultra 7 vs 5700x3D
I do like how you keep RDR2 in your testing.
think itll be on (my) schedule
4:14 447 fps vs 333 fps..this is just crazy...wtf is intel releasing..
Me too !!
The processor is bottlenecking the gpu, GPU load is under 60%
@@rifa.3307 even if it is bottlenecking there is no point getting beyond 300FPS because most people don't have a 300HZ monitor to feel those FPS.
@@rifa.3307we WANT to be cpu bottlenecked.
@@goregejones7248 A CRT at 75Hz feels better than those "gaming monitors" from personal experience. Refreshrate is kinda irrelevant if the pixel response time is not 0.
Anyone still buying intel, especially for gaming, is coping HARD!
Well, i'm still pretty happy with my 12100F i bought for just 80$. But my next upgrade is sure as shit going to be AMD.
Look . I UNDERSTAND BUT IF YOU ARE GPU BOUND WHICH IS IDEAL EVEN 12TH GEN INTEL Is NOT A BAD OPTION
Thanks incel loser
KEK
Well only for new Ultra gen or 13&14 gen, the 12th gen and AM4 still very good for the price
intel spend 300mln on diversity projects instead of investing in uv lithography, intel ceo was busy doing romances with co-workers, they waste 10 years when they had an advantage over amd
....
Pat makes intel great again
@@Solamnic Let your eyes look straight ahead; fix your gaze directly before you. Give careful thought to the paths for your feet and be steadfast in all your ways ....
RIP Intel Era 💀💀
Only 1% user cares about synthetic benchmarks ☠☠
Alert 🚨 After this competition intel is still crying in the corner 😭😭🤣
Intel counting down time till the 9800x3d will doom glory kill them 😂
they are more likely counting down the time till they have there own stacked cache developed. With cudimms and there stacked cache coming its amd who should be worried
@terryohare7049 first they need a working stable chip
Yes, 9800x3d will be absolute killer 100%
@@terryohare7049well they better hurry before they have to fire more people and sell the company huh 🤔. Intel has had now what 5 years to make a comeback and it’s just gotten worse.
@@terryohare7049amd will have even more mature 3D cache. They are multiple years ahead of Intel in that technology. Also Intel will not be able to continue operating for more than 2 years at this level of losses.
And the more Intel responds to the appearance of 9800x3D, the more the latter can still be overclocked!?
Can't wait to see the 9800X3D performance on the new X870 chipset in games!
God a the 9800x3d is coming. And it’s not confirmed yet, but it might not be the fastest for gaming of the x3D chips anymore if the larger chips boost higher and all cores have v cache.
All of this while consuming less than Intel ( arrow lake being an energy optimization to prior architecture)
The roughly 20W power draw delta on these 2 CPUs is pretty noticble when you look for it.
The lower draw chip is the clear winner.
7800x3d was indeed winning before core ultra introduced, still overall cost is cheaper today
Only if I could find a 7800x3d for less than 600 dollars, shits sold out everywhere
After this video, the X3D will increase price, not surprising. 🤣🥴
Oh intel...
Ryzen 7800X3D is 2022 product and 9800X3D will be 10 % better than 7800X3D.I am not sure if I buy 9800X3D or 9900X3D but I certainly won't buy intel cpu.
It will be interesting to check the same games with a new GTX 5090. I suppose that results of the 7800 3d will be higher.
I have a 7800X3D so I am all for this.... However. I (like most people) don't play at 1080p, so these comparison videos are getting to be a little pointless. Yes, I understand this is showing CPU power/bottleneck and you need 1080p to do that, but in the real world for those who play at 1440p and 4K, the fps difference is very little. So for someone who plays at 4K and also uses their PC for productivity, the Core Ultra series would actually be the better option... And finally... anyone who buys a Core Ultra CPU, ain't going to be playing games at 1080p.
competitive gamers. they exist.
@@catfacecat. Very true. But you are completely missing my point. I could confidently say professional/competitive e-sports gamers who watch these comparison videos compared to the average PC gamer/enthusiast who watch these comparison videos would probably be a ratio of something like 1:500. The point I am making is.... A large proportion (most likely the majority) of people who watch these videos are not using 1080p as a resolution, whether it be gaming or productivity. And I personally would rather see these comparisons at more than just 1080p.
Estaría bien ver otras resolución mayores ya no por el frame avg si no para ver quien aguanta con mejores mínimos y menos stutter
I rate AMD would still be the better option because you would be using less power for slightly better performance at 1440p and 4k
@@thornstrikesback that's fair, but they compare at 1080p to show the diffrence. but even then i sometimes get bottlenecked by my 7800x3d at 1440p. gpu is 4080S. as for productivity you could say 14900k is the best for both at the same time, but 7950x3d is doing pretty good too. plus amds 9900x3d and 9950x3d claims to fix the dual CCD issue. so faster than 9800x3d possibly.
フレームレート、消費電力、
全ての面でIntelは負けているんです😭
GPU側は食ってないから実は消費電力はトントンな気がする
ゲームにもよるけど
でも性能で大差つけられてるし
全く選択肢に入らんねIntelは
Any chance you've got a I9-9900k still laying around. I want to upgrade my PC but want to see if the Ultra 9 Processor 285K is really that much better than my 9900k. I'm running a RTX4090
Why would you even consider the 285k ultra (slow)?
7800X3D is clearly better than 285K. I guess, if your intel fanboy, then it's understandable.
even I5 12600k is faster than your 9900k. so upgrading to the newest Ryzen/Intel, 5/7 series (you decides) will always worth it for you.
Intel 265k has the exact same price range here in my country with 7900X3D. Can you please compare them in the next video? I know the double CCD on the 7900X3D may not be as good as the 7800X3D. Thanks in advance.
Get 9800x3$
Intel must be proud of the Black Ops 6 results. Gonna put on their comparisons to show their muscles 💪🏼
The surprising fact is that the FPS is extremely low 0.1% on both platforms! Where are the long-promised PCIe 5 video cards?
Интел перестал быть конкурентом амд. Второй уже давно победу забрал
Now INTEL will not able to sell us
Its new generations with +3% efficiency!
God bless AMD 🙌
It would be great if they did that, but they silently worsened some things in their new processors, such as latency, stability, support for high performance peripherals.
in the description it says vs 14700k tho. otherwise nice video!!
I am very happy to have the best CPU RYZEN 7 7800x3D. Thx
Same until 9800x3d im waiting after 9800x3d
@Jason_Bover9000 I'll probably also buy a 9800x3d if it's for reasonable money, we'll see what the tests do.,👍
@Hakaluk_BENCHMARK i might just skip it and wait honestly I don't think it will be worth it over 7800x3d my opinion of course I will check benchmarks though
@Hakaluk_BENCHMARK there saying 479 I got my 7800x3d for 360 I think or 320 im not sure on Amazon it came with Avatar game
@@Jason_Bover9000 470 EURO is OK, 7800x3D costs that much now 🙂
this is gonna be bad for AMD fans. AMD are gonna increase their prices now that they realize Intel is no competition :(
Most ridiculous is that intel already had Broadwell with l4 128mb l4 cache in 2015. Which performed equally to next skylake generation despite having ddr3 ram, and lower core frequency.
Why not use l4 cache once again, to compete with 3d cache of amd?
7:54 7800x3d almost bottleneck RTX4090 in 1080P 💀🗿
96% load 🔥
And it's counter strike 💀
@@sutapachakraborty9337 Counter Strike 2 still refuses to use all of my 20 threads on my 12700K just like CSGO. Doesn't count, that game is broken on Intel.
@@saricubra2867 Not everything can be split among especially 20 threads..... there are limits to programming... You don't even need more thread usage. CS2 runs at 700fps
@@mitsuhh CSGO was launched over 10 yearas ago and maxing out on 16 threads makes sense, CS2 doesn't, it was launched last year.
Intel Core Ultra FX 7 265K.
Ever since Ryzen 5000 launched, AMD has just been giving more frames than Intel for way less power
Nah the intel 12th gen absolutely obliterated ryzen 5000
@@RandomBruv65 but Ryzen 7000 came out to compete with it
@@RandomBruv6512 gen dont beat 5800x3d
@@RandomBruv65it came out after tho, and it still lost to the 5800x3D. The 7800x3d later on just made Intel irrelevant for everyone.
@@tiago88610 12gen with DDR5 beats 5800X3D. It makes a huge difference over DDR4.
Only upside intel new processor tempature is more cooler about 7-10 degrees. Except that Ryzen is a goat.
A gaming cpu draw less power than a supposedly power efficiency cpu is wild
besides the fact that amd is better, I see a potential issue with the 7800x3d: it seems that the 8c/16thr is a bit of a bottle neck for some games. When you have above 70% cpu usage and the gpu is at 85% usage that may be a problem in the future :)... I'm not complaining all that much because I am going to buy the 9800x3d this week (or when it will arrive at my local stores) but it still may be something to consider.
Intel temperatures actually impressive. The tests are correct and everything good about this video, but don't forget it is not realistic scenario of using the CPU. Realistic scenario would be at least 2560x1440 screen resolution. Since its RTX 4090 then 4K minimum
I would like to get the X3D chip. But, the 7800x3d isn't the best when it comes to workloads.
It will be interesting to see what the 9950x3D is like, we should learn more details about it at CES in January.
@@ravere1314you mean 9800x3d
@@Jason_Bover9000 no, the 9800xd is releasing on the 7th. The poster was talking about non-gaming workloads which is something the 9950x3D would be very good at as well as being excellent at gaming, it should be coming out in early 2025
@@ravere1314 I hope that it's all X3D cache on both CCDs. I heared people would rather have an i9-13900K or a 14900K over a 7950X3D due to the scheduling problems.
In some games i.e. RDR2 and PUBG I wonder that AMD system can push more power to GPU making total power almost similar in both system
ultra 200 series are a bit like ZEN 1 vs kaby lake...
its a way stronger CPU for compute but suffer from latency so its bad for gaming.
but the price is not good as the price of ZEN 1 was.
but there is one important thing to note, non of them will actually limit u in gaming at 4K with 4080/4090, if the 5090 will be nuts u might see some limitation in some games.
i think that intel must lower the price and start to work on her "zen 2" moment when a long term plan come together.
but intel has no price nor the performance ,its a bad product .
@@fdgdfgdfgdfg3811 that is way the ZEN 1 was interesting and refreshing even if not for every one...
and the U 200 is just boring.
intel have a " we are the best and we will sell any thing any time" mind set, the problem is that they lost it years ago.
Test with CUDIMMS and Ultimate power mode?
to be fair, any amd processor vs the 3D chip is just as ridiculous
Did they even test this CPU before release. Fuck me. This is hilarious.
если он на 30 ватт меньше потребляет, что ж он греется больше?
4:55 почему видеокарта на половину загружена? что за бред
видеокарта в процессор уперлась
5:55 - looks like Intel Ultra 200 can handle better with Unreal 4-5 engine stutters, even if average fps is lover. Please test Silent Hill 2 aka Stutter Hill
bug in the description: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K vs Core i7 14700K l 1080p
Someone need to do a test when intel having like 7000mhz ram because it's easy cappable of. Difference might be lower, even tho the new 9800X3D is coming and it will have better memory controller so we will see how much of MHz ram it will run stable.
Yo bro how much amd pays you ??
Do the same benchmark in 2k and 4k please, and btw I was expecting 9800x3D to crush intel 265k way harder considering the intel 100-120 pounds less, and for the AMD fanboys , yes you can't contest 9800x3D is better but in those benchmarks where it had 100+ fps over intel , my friends , nobody who is sane cares if his game plays in 350 fps or 450 fps just saying , plus intel was colder , so that means gold for OC amateurs. imo big W intel with the price of this CPU. I was thinking to buy 9800X3D but for this difference not worth the extra money plus CUDIMM is around the corner
You have wrong information in the description bro
This intel might be good
100$ cheaper, in some games near same performance it means it has the potential
Som guys got way better fps by disabling some cores
So this cpu should be on par with 5800x3d? xD
The funny part is that in 1 year intel will come up with a new socket Imao
w11 24h2?
Yes
@@TestingGames pls test god of war 3, ps3 emulation is also demanding for cpu🥺
15th gen is dead. Lets go buy 14gen
Wondows updated to 24h2?
he's gaming on Linox
@@flaczkizhe is on windows 95 don't lie.
@@Dr.Mmmmmm wondows*
idk if 7800x3d found cheap why not it only slight slower than ultras, with way cheaper total cost
the default should be abt same as 14600k/ 13900k, which is damn fast and it wins by easy pbo+performance mode on ryzen master app
I am inte fan my whole life,i was waiting for error lake ,and now i am disappointed,r.i.p intel gonna upgrade 13700k to 9800x3d
Intel core ultra 200s are for editing, video rendering and stream computer. I think
it's sometimes difficult to justify the CPU for streaming, because the streamer could use Nvidia's NVENC encoder instead. But this depends on the streamer's preferences too. Some people don't like the NVENC encoder. If this is the case though and the streamer wants to use the CPU, then 16x E-Cores are better for streaming. Also, Intel's iGPU could also be used for streaming.
They are for nothing, just useless CPUs with high prices.
@@PLAY4_FUN that is you're own opinion
@@SachaVincent-x1p Of course, who said the opposite ?
@@PLAY4_FUN nobody 😄
your GPU never maxes out in utilization why is that
I want to think Intel is making a U7 275K with higher TDP and perfomance…
Or 265K is the low-wattage model of U7 or Intel is totally destroyed
then itll just match a 14900k in gaming performance and use the same amount of power again
@ Not this time.
Why? Intel has a new litography and core desigment, and now, 285K is 5-15% slower than 14900K but it uses half wattage and it’s 30 degrees cooler.
Intel needs to put on the market a U5 255K, U7 275K and U9 295K for be competitive with AMD.
AMD has no rivals right now with 7800X3D, and it’s releasing a 9800X3D
"Nowdays just buy intel" they said. 😂😂😂 Me Laughing with my 7800x3d in my room 😂😂😂
What about productivity 😂 Intel clearly dominant
этот тест должен был быть самым первым!!
all that power and ryzen still run less watt, what a shame intel 😪
7800x3d was under 400, now I will buy 9800x3d for under 500
for now intels main goal is to have cooler cpus nothing else it seems.
Still power hungry, very underpowered, and Expensive it's time to say goodbye Intel. rip intel
This Intel CPU is amazing for creators and terrible for gamers.
I'm gonna stick with my 7800x3d for a while now, probably until 12800x3d came
It's gonna be called ryzen ai max 600 someshit they changing the names all over
Это кабздец какой-то! Что называется - унижен
using 6000mhz ram 😂
Yea i think this isn't a fair comparison when it come to memory speed, AMD is if i'm correct working in gear 1 with 6000mhz, while intel is in gear 2 which gives it higher memory latency, a more fair comparing would be intel with something like 8800mhz pushing the gear 2. Not that it would matter the 7800x3D would still win, but the gap would be a little smaller :)
@@RaptorRobb6ix People already running 9200mhz ram on 285k
@@RaptorRobb6ix How about we disable the x3d as intel doesnt have that (yet) Test should be done with cudimms and see the difference then
спасибо за PUBG!👍
What about productivity 😂 Intel clearly dominant . And all rounder
Intel produces 13 gen again after fail. Thats all you should know about Core Ultra
1:13 This video in a nutshell:
Intel is not even winning the efficiency battle
Intel lost their hands in doing CPUs.
intel Ultra: Ultra reduce performance
9800x3d destroy even next generation Intel
Test in 1440p and 2160p ultra graphics
I have a 7800X3D. But what I see in these Ultras is that they weren't made for games. Keep in mind that it's a new design, a new architecture, if it's something for the future, only Intel knows, but at least it's not like AMD where the only thing they delivered was a reboot of the last generation. Let's see what the future will say.
like pentium 4 and rambus was for future ... and future never come ...
Guy just ignored the 14th gen Intel CPUs 🤣
@@PanchoGDMKWiibecause they're dead already
At least don't consume like they before cpus!
Core ultra......go sleeping
Bro put laughing emoji on intel side on the thumbnail.
intel made processor not just for gaming, change my mind :D
and the 9800x3d is coming......
In PUBG use only Dx11E not Dx11
intel只有温度控制胜,其他完败.
Look at the temperature. İntel is way better. Wait for Windows updates.
now against 9900x
CPU Power consumption of intel hehe:)
Ryzen 7 7800 x3d price over
u can see its cpu's limited