40s technology probably cannot hold it together at that speed because it is such a big boi. The Shimakaze consumed as much fuel as a battleship as a 40-knot DD, but even she has nothing on this one
I remember reading about a British fast cruiser. She was built for minelaying, the plan was to nip in after it was too late for the luftwaffe to respond, and be far enough away by dawn that they couldn't be attacked. IIRC she was designed for 46 knots and could go faster. They were often used as fast transports. In the Falklands war, the US were moving a carrier group to the area to pressure the British, and one of these came up behind it, enroute themselves. The yanks, not wanting to be shown up, increased speed. Finally, the carrier was pounding along at maximum speed with what escorts could keep up in that sea state and the cruiser came past with the nautical equivalent of a cheery wave and a "we'll see you when you get there" signal before haring off into the distance.
What the game is lacking are some newer Torpedo Boat hulls like the PT 71, where such a ridiculous speed is not that ridiculous. Cheap, small, fast. Other than that Warthunder has some Hydrofoil Crafts. At least the existet at that time.
I'm not sure this speed is ever not ridiculous. At that speed having any crew on deck is.....well, have you practiced your man over board scream? Me, carefully not thinking about that theoretical super-cavitating SWATH with over 120 knots top speed.
I feel like with campaign, it' be a good idea to have a task force composed entirely of 40+ knot ships, with a battlecruiser thrown in there to give it some bite. It would serve as an extremely fast reactionary force, both independently, and by being able to rapidly bolster a slower task force.
Deja vu i have been in this sea before, higher on the waves, and i know its my time to sail, hailing you and the treasure is a mystery, standing on my deck, its so hard when im listing woooaaah.
Ships like that would do well in targeted convoy attacks. As far as the campaign goes, I’m betting it won’t be seeing even the most basic of campaign until we’re well into 2022.
Very impressive! I’m surprised none of the comments mention the super high speed “cruiser” Wirbelwind from the Naval Ops series since she was also capable of 70-90 knots depending on the game.
That battlecruiser would be an amazing raider or convoy hunter. With that level of speed you would always be in control of the engagement time and place. Terror ship!
Burns more fuel than the Iowa herself. Being American, she can't cross the pacific, and it would make more sense in the Regia Marina and especially the Austrian navy
OH MY GOODNESS I just built my own version of this (it had 70% engine efficiency :P) and that battle I just had against a light cruiser was the most fun Ive had in UAD in a long while! dodging gunfire, missing my first double torps, stalling while desperately reloading, swinging in for a final attack without smoke and half my ship flooded, fixing the flooding just in time to get within 2km just when my smoke came back, rushing in at max speed and launching my torps just outside their priming (non exploding) zone (1/4km i think) and one shotting that ship. Most fun ive had in a long time in UAD
Nations with the best Hull Forms for each type: French BBs (up to 119), British BCs (up to 125), Italian cruisers (up to 124), and the Shimakaze hull (115).
"You have the speed to outrun the shells" --Yuro Edit: If I can ask, does having 0 inches of armor virtually make your hull made of air? Like if you're building this thing, it will only have the engine, deck, funnels, towers, torpedo, and guns?
0 inches of armor just means there's no armor, there's still the metal of the hull, it just won't protect against anything. Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point.
@@Kneb587 >Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point. Ships this size are too heavily armored simply because they are too heavy to be made out of sheetmetal and need to be made from plates of metal.
@@D8W2P4 i believe you might be mixing up hardened armor plate (of which that design has exactly none) and structural steel (which is not made to stop bullets of any kind). And given that it was designed to go as fast as possible they wouldn't be wasting any spare metal on making the hull thicker than absolutely necessary, and while I'm no engineering expert I'm also certain that a hull made only of a single layer of structural steel could be pierced by practically *any* handheld firearm. Because that's exactly what has happened any time anyone has fired on an unarmored ship, no mater the size.
@@Kneb587 As the police that killed Bonnie and Clyde found out in preparing for their ambush, early Ford cars are bullet proof to .45 ACP. Which is just sheet metal for the body, yes thick sheet metal but still just sheet metal. Now while I'm no ship building expert I have seen what ships are made out of and it ain't thin. Nevermind the simple considerations of weight tell me they're gonna need to make the ships out of something heavier than sheet metal.
In the interest of nit-picking accuracy, a volley of ten shots at 0.5% hit chance each has a 95.1% chance of completely missing. It's just that sometimes they'll hit with more than one shell in a volley. It also means they'd have to fire fourteen volleys to get a 50% chance to land at least one hit.
60kts, pretty speedy! If you can reach 88kts it's back to the future. Hopefully take your modern Dreadnought to fight the French at Trafalgar, shouldn't take long to win that. Then it's off to kick the Armada's arse.
the hyper fast DD might still work well and possibly better at 50 knots which will still pretty much outrun anything and just might offer up a degree of survivability above better firepower. at such speeds, gunnery is still going to be Aim optional! so focus on Torps with the best and fastest type you can load leaving the single mount 2" popgun just for giggles or the odd Transport. as part of a larger fleet action, it could be deployed as a headhunter running in a stand alone division of 3-5 ships that can use their speed to flank the opponent who is already engaged with your other elements allowing them to dash in and dump a pile of Fast Torps before executing a rapid withdrawal under smoke to reload. the alternative would be Convoy Raider in the Campaign as these ships are cheap compared to a CH or BC needing far less resources to operate as well as a much faster build time. I can accept engine efficiency in the mid/high 90's if it gives me 1 more twin Torp launcher.
I don’t play at all, but it makes me think of the sneaky bois submarine kill teams you made in that wwii game you were playing a while back. Send two of those with a group and use them to prey upon transports maybe, or in the assassin group you mentioned. Use one to lay a smokescreen and strike from it with the other one. It’s certainly the only ship you can use that will keep up with one.
All the Matari mains on EVE be like, "Bruh, you're doing it wrong." But for real, if your ship can will burn down if it catches fire 100% of the time, then not being hit by 99.95% of shells is NOT GOOD ENOUGH, when you consider than it's common for a ship to fire several thousands of shells over the course of 30 minutes. For speed tanking to work, you'd need an average evasion of around 99.995% over the course of an engagement.
I mean, battlecruisers being fast is what they are supposed to be. They are supposed to run down cruisers. That's why Battlecruisers are more expensive then Battleships. Pure Engine power
I found it weird how such limit is not a thing in Navel Academy mode. The displacement limitation is only in custom battle which shouldn't be since it is pretty much free-build sandbox mode.
I would want to see a video where you try to build the fastest battlecruiser possible. *Armament restrictions* 3×16 inch triple barrel main guns or 4×15 inch double barrel main guns everything else can be an open design. *Fleets* Both fleets are 1940 Your fleet shall be comprised of 1 BB, 2 BC, 6 CA, 4 CL, and 12 DD. The opposing fleet shall be comprised of 2 BB, 1 BC, 8 CA, and 14 DD from a nation of your choosing.
@@Stealth17Gaming I'm just expecting a high usage of flanking due to your speed, although you can reduce the amount of smaller ships (CA and lower) as you see fit.
I do have a couple of question coming with this "super fast" destroyer, does the Terrible (fastest ship during trials with 44 knots) 5.47 inches (138,9 mm) main battery has been added yet. Anyhow, still funny to watch, have a nice day
Sorry, I haven't bought the game yet. Could you get to 60km without all the funnels? And that would shave the weight? Balance funnels with the arms/armor/tech and just don't turn so much. you'll still get the speed bonus for approach and enemy chance to hit. Still not much to work with, but at least some and some range for campaign. I'll have to try that.
Hi stealth, can you make a CL kinda like Kitakami at some point. I don’t care what exactly you go for as far as guns, the only requirement I have is that it must have more torpedo launchers (as in the turret as a whole) then gun turrets.
@@Stealth17Gaming yes, I seen when u do the other hulls at the end, but what I'm asking is if u can do a scenario with the 45 knots in mind and that type of hull that I was saying
This game has to overthink the funel thing that is if you build a car whit 2 100cm holes just for airflow and tell someone its just half of what it needs even if the whole ship is an engine 2 funels shoud be enough
Edit: the standard angled funnel does not offer enough marginal benefit to overcome the weight costs, but I will leave this comment as a hypothetical for discussing funnels in general. Would it not have been more weight-efficient to use fewer larger funnels than several smaller ones? Since the standard angled funnel was only 50% more weight, if it offered more than 50% more efficiency per funnel, surely that would have been the better option, yes?
I did the math on it. The 75 ton funnel (smallest) has the most exhaust/ton at 0,3933 110 ton funnel - 0,3181 exhaust/ton 140 ton funnel - 0,3214 exhaust/ton 156 ton funnel - 0,3077 exhaust/ton
@@Stealth17Gaming Which is why I corrected myself in the edit. I had noticed that your mouse hovered for just a moment over the 110-tonne funnel, and caught that it gave an exhaust value of 35, which is not enough marginal benefit for the weight increase. Also, I understand the desire for the largest weapons possible, but wouldn't it have been better to use a few 21-inch torpedoes rather than two or three 24-inch launchers?
Why not just use fewer of the heavier funnels which have larger capacity they give you a higher percentage an engine efficiency for less weight if you have to use Fewer
![Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts - Port Strike [Germany 1940 Destroyers Only #2]](/img/n.gif)
What sort of role would you have for a fast ship like this?
Probably recon and convoy harrassment
also makeshift troop transport
Basically HMS Thunderchild
pizza delivery for the fleet lol
@@bryanwakefield8879 Dominos now also delivers at sea!
Nobody:
Stealth: let's make this boi fast
Boat: E U R O B E A T engage
*Deja vu starts playing*
@@antonioradovic7461 Exactly my dude, exactly.
euroboat
40s technology probably cannot hold it together at that speed because it is such a big boi. The Shimakaze consumed as much fuel as a battleship as a 40-knot DD, but even she has nothing on this one
60 knots converts to 69.04 mph. Nice
111km per hour
About 30 m/s
_Deja Vu! I just drifted this ship before- HIGHER ON THE SEAS! And I know it's my time to fire!_
insane
+1 for creativity 👌
@@Moon_Cricket_Stinks ik he a gamer
OHHHHHHHHHHHH. **Eurobeat Intensifies**
What a legend
I remember reading about a British fast cruiser. She was built for minelaying, the plan was to nip in after it was too late for the luftwaffe to respond, and be far enough away by dawn that they couldn't be attacked. IIRC she was designed for 46 knots and could go faster. They were often used as fast transports.
In the Falklands war, the US were moving a carrier group to the area to pressure the British, and one of these came up behind it, enroute themselves. The yanks, not wanting to be shown up, increased speed. Finally, the carrier was pounding along at maximum speed with what escorts could keep up in that sea state and the cruiser came past with the nautical equivalent of a cheery wave and a "we'll see you when you get there" signal before haring off into the distance.
It's a racing boat.
11:23 No, it's a drift car! :-D
Basically, it's a big PT boat.
Yea
What the game is lacking are some newer Torpedo Boat hulls like the PT 71, where such a ridiculous speed is not that ridiculous. Cheap, small, fast. Other than that Warthunder has some Hydrofoil Crafts. At least the existet at that time.
I'm not sure this speed is ever not ridiculous. At that speed having any crew on deck is.....well, have you practiced your man over board scream?
Me, carefully not thinking about that theoretical super-cavitating SWATH with over 120 knots top speed.
@@Starjumper2821 seatbelts were invented by then
@@Starjumper2821 thing is,they are so small some don’t even have a deck
@@Starjumper2821 simple, tethers everywhere.
I feel like with campaign, it' be a good idea to have a task force composed entirely of 40+ knot ships, with a battlecruiser thrown in there to give it some bite. It would serve as an extremely fast reactionary force, both independently, and by being able to rapidly bolster a slower task force.
It doesn't matter, sad to say.
Fast and Furious, naval edition.
Captain's name must be Torretto.
*is getting Arpeggio of Blue Steel vibes from this video*
Also that ship is powered by Budlight.
What a surprise to see you here. This is MadLad from Discord
@@jamesgroccia644 Hello there.
Budlight? I'm getting GrayStillPlays vibes for some reason, like Florida Man built this in his backyard shipyard
Stealth: “Fortunately, the enemy heavy cruiser has yet to fire at me.” Just as then two shells fly right over him.
Deja vu i have been in this sea before, higher on the waves, and i know its my time to sail, hailing you and the treasure is a mystery, standing on my deck, its so hard when im listing woooaaah.
That ship turning = Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts: Tokyo Drift 🤣
70% of the ship is engine and the rest are funnels..
Game: Sorry, but it looks like your engine is going to be inefficient.
Mostly because they still think you need boilers to raise steam, or that diesel engines don't make much power at the kind of RPM it constantly reaches
Its goes nowhere, but it goes there fast!
.... So that is how the Car Makers, make Car Data Sheets
Ships like that would do well in targeted convoy attacks. As far as the campaign goes, I’m betting it won’t be seeing even the most basic of campaign until we’re well into 2022.
This comment aged well /s
@bruh but we saw said basic campaign months ago
GAS GAS GASS GOTTA STEPONTHEGAS
_Toniiiight I flyyy!!!!_
Very impressive! I’m surprised none of the comments mention the super high speed “cruiser” Wirbelwind from the Naval Ops series since she was also capable of 70-90 knots depending on the game.
That battlecruiser would be an amazing raider or convoy hunter. With that level of speed you would always be in control of the engagement time and place. Terror ship!
Burns more fuel than the Iowa herself. Being American, she can't cross the pacific, and it would make more sense in the Regia Marina and especially the Austrian navy
**Ship enters turn**
**Eurobeat starts playing**
Multi-hull dorifuto?!
congratulations? you've made a fast attack craft/PT boat
The concept has been explored
:D
OH MY GOODNESS I just built my own version of this (it had 70% engine efficiency :P) and that battle I just had against a light cruiser was the most fun Ive had in UAD in a long while! dodging gunfire, missing my first double torps, stalling while desperately reloading, swinging in for a final attack without smoke and half my ship flooded, fixing the flooding just in time to get within 2km just when my smoke came back, rushing in at max speed and launching my torps just outside their priming (non exploding) zone (1/4km i think) and one shotting that ship. Most fun ive had in a long time in UAD
we need some eurobeat for this speedy boi
Naval Designer:How fast do you want this ship to be Sir?
FDR:Yes
man heavy cruisers for britain need its own super stuctures badly and its own hull i will say county class cruisers
Drop it back to 55 knots, triple torps at both ends, and drive straight through the enemy fleet
Nations with the best Hull Forms for each type: French BBs (up to 119), British BCs (up to 125), Italian cruisers (up to 124), and the Shimakaze hull (115).
Try placing the funnels across the beam, it can allow more deck space either for even more funnels or any armaments (if you don't have any already)
"You have the speed to outrun the shells"
--Yuro
Edit: If I can ask, does having 0 inches of armor virtually make your hull made of air? Like if you're building this thing, it will only have the engine, deck, funnels, towers, torpedo, and guns?
Basically everything full penetrates at any angle. Paper ship made of real paper.
0 inches of armor just means there's no armor, there's still the metal of the hull, it just won't protect against anything. Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point.
@@Kneb587
>Even a pistol round can punch through it at that point.
Ships this size are too heavily armored simply because they are too heavy to be made out of sheetmetal and need to be made from plates of metal.
@@D8W2P4 i believe you might be mixing up hardened armor plate (of which that design has exactly none) and structural steel (which is not made to stop bullets of any kind).
And given that it was designed to go as fast as possible they wouldn't be wasting any spare metal on making the hull thicker than absolutely necessary, and while I'm no engineering expert I'm also certain that a hull made only of a single layer of structural steel could be pierced by practically *any* handheld firearm.
Because that's exactly what has happened any time anyone has fired on an unarmored ship, no mater the size.
@@Kneb587
As the police that killed Bonnie and Clyde found out in preparing for their ambush, early Ford cars are bullet proof to .45 ACP.
Which is just sheet metal for the body, yes thick sheet metal but still just sheet metal.
Now while I'm no ship building expert I have seen what ships are made out of and it ain't thin. Nevermind the simple considerations of weight tell me they're gonna need to make the ships out of something heavier than sheet metal.
This is the meme ship. Someone please edit deja vu to that clip.
In the interest of nit-picking accuracy, a volley of ten shots at 0.5% hit chance each has a 95.1% chance of completely missing. It's just that sometimes they'll hit with more than one shell in a volley.
It also means they'd have to fire fourteen volleys to get a 50% chance to land at least one hit.
This is great I started laughing when I saw the caption 😂🤣👍
60kts, pretty speedy! If you can reach 88kts it's back to the future. Hopefully take your modern Dreadnought to fight the French at Trafalgar, shouldn't take long to win that. Then it's off to kick the Armada's arse.
the hyper fast DD might still work well and possibly better at 50 knots which will still pretty much outrun anything and just might offer up a degree of survivability above better firepower.
at such speeds, gunnery is still going to be Aim optional! so focus on Torps with the best and fastest type you can load leaving the single mount 2" popgun just for giggles or the odd Transport.
as part of a larger fleet action, it could be deployed as a headhunter running in a stand alone division of 3-5 ships that can use their speed to flank the opponent who is already engaged with your other elements allowing them to dash in and dump a pile of Fast Torps before executing a rapid withdrawal under smoke to reload.
the alternative would be Convoy Raider in the Campaign as these ships are cheap compared to a CH or BC needing far less resources to operate as well as a much faster build time.
I can accept engine efficiency in the mid/high 90's if it gives me 1 more twin Torp launcher.
I don’t play at all, but it makes me think of the sneaky bois submarine kill teams you made in that wwii game you were playing a while back. Send two of those with a group and use them to prey upon transports maybe, or in the assassin group you mentioned. Use one to lay a smokescreen and strike from it with the other one. It’s certainly the only ship you can use that will keep up with one.
Admiral Fisher would be proud.
All the Matari mains on EVE be like, "Bruh, you're doing it wrong." But for real, if your ship can will burn down if it catches fire 100% of the time, then not being hit by 99.95% of shells is NOT GOOD ENOUGH, when you consider than it's common for a ship to fire several thousands of shells over the course of 30 minutes. For speed tanking to work, you'd need an average evasion of around 99.995% over the course of an engagement.
In the words of Jeremy Clarkson: "SPEED AND POWER"
I’m surprised you didn’t try to paint it red either.
I mean, battlecruisers being fast is what they are supposed to be. They are supposed to run down cruisers. That's why Battlecruisers are more expensive then Battleships. Pure Engine power
You could have gone 55kts and done more with the ship, and those bonuses would have still been absurd.
Why isn't this possible anymore? I guess devs decided 51 knots is maximum, now?
I found it weird how such limit is not a thing in Navel Academy mode. The displacement limitation is only in custom battle which shouldn't be since it is pretty much free-build sandbox mode.
I got excited that this was my ship request but alas it wasn’t🥲
I would want to see a video where you try to build the fastest battlecruiser possible.
*Armament restrictions*
3×16 inch triple barrel main guns or 4×15 inch double barrel main guns
everything else can be an open design.
*Fleets*
Both fleets are 1940
Your fleet shall be comprised of 1 BB, 2 BC, 6 CA, 4 CL, and 12 DD.
The opposing fleet shall be comprised of 2 BB, 1 BC, 8 CA, and 14 DD from a nation of your choosing.
With that many ships it's going to be a complete mess.
@@Stealth17Gaming I'm just expecting a high usage of flanking due to your speed, although you can reduce the amount of smaller ships (CA and lower) as you see fit.
Still waiting for Nevada class hulls…
the fastest WW2 era ship was a french DD with 45 knots.
Nice,nvm,my mistake
thats the biggest torpedo i've ever seen
now do that again this time the SLOWEST battleship in the game
So Hashima?
this thing basically is the Sonic of destroyers
This destroyer uses Red Bull and Monster Energy instead of oil
im pretty shure the poor spotting and concealment is something to do with your smoke interference from all those funnels
The cost/ month during the ship building maybe indicates something in the future.
Yeah campaign feature.
Hmmmm, a extreme fast response recon/courier destroyer
Can you make a video on the most accurate ship you can make? I think it would be cool
Love your content bro
You need a battle ship that can drift.. like in the Battleship movie
Didn't they drop anchor to do that?
@@Stealth17Gaming they did
bruh 60 knots what the fuck
the way she drifts with her hull underwater lmao
For freedom!
I do have a couple of question coming with this "super fast" destroyer, does the Terrible (fastest ship during trials with 44 knots) 5.47 inches (138,9 mm) main battery has been added yet. Anyhow, still funny to watch, have a nice day
Shouldve named it paolo emilio.
11:01 450k hp in a ship weighing in at 3500 tons.
Sorry, I haven't bought the game yet. Could you get to 60km without all the funnels? And that would shave the weight?
Balance funnels with the arms/armor/tech and just don't turn so much. you'll still get the speed bonus for approach and enemy chance to hit. Still not much to work with, but at least some and some range for campaign. I'll have to try that.
Man the thing is so fast it like a car
Counter blockade capital ship ambusher.
so basically its drifting
Why not just use the ship as a very large and fast torpedo and ram the enemy?
Expensiv torp. It will probably sink before the target sinks.
Hi stealth, can you make a CL kinda like Kitakami at some point. I don’t care what exactly you go for as far as guns, the only requirement I have is that it must have more torpedo launchers (as in the turret as a whole) then gun turrets.
Ok thx
Can u try with light and heavy cruisers hulls next time? I have a theory that at least 1 hull can do 45knots or more
You didn't watch the full video.
@@Stealth17Gaming I'm 💯 sure I did, I might be wrong but when u on lock every hull some time the speed is drop to the mid settings
@@Stealth17Gaming yes, I seen when u do the other hulls at the end, but what I'm asking is if u can do a scenario with the 45 knots in mind and that type of hull that I was saying
This game has to overthink the funel thing that is if you build a car whit 2 100cm holes just for airflow and tell someone its just half of what it needs even if the whole ship is an engine 2 funels shoud be enough
Interesting
Isnt there a better funnel?
*Paolo Emilio wants to know your location*
world of warships in a nutshell
Edit: the standard angled funnel does not offer enough marginal benefit to overcome the weight costs, but I will leave this comment as a hypothetical for discussing funnels in general.
Would it not have been more weight-efficient to use fewer larger funnels than several smaller ones? Since the standard angled funnel was only 50% more weight, if it offered more than 50% more efficiency per funnel, surely that would have been the better option, yes?
I did the math on it.
The 75 ton funnel (smallest) has the most exhaust/ton at 0,3933
110 ton funnel - 0,3181 exhaust/ton
140 ton funnel - 0,3214 exhaust/ton
156 ton funnel - 0,3077 exhaust/ton
@@Stealth17Gaming Which is why I corrected myself in the edit. I had noticed that your mouse hovered for just a moment over the 110-tonne funnel, and caught that it gave an exhaust value of 35, which is not enough marginal benefit for the weight increase.
Also, I understand the desire for the largest weapons possible, but wouldn't it have been better to use a few 21-inch torpedoes rather than two or three 24-inch launchers?
How light can it get ? Wouldn't it be easier if the ship was as light as possible ? To start from 1700tonnes ,
Tried that. Less displacement means less room for engines, even though the ship is lighter. You need the displacement I used.
Why not just use fewer of the heavier funnels which have larger capacity they give you a higher percentage an engine efficiency for less weight if you have to use Fewer
No they don't. Check another comment of mine for the math.
@@Stealth17Gaming ok just curious
What game is this
no armor is the best armor.
fisher's wet dream
Nice Meme ship!!!
Put thaw armour on deck
Now mod it to battleship class, 200000t
so all your saying is the game a Janky as hell and not correct at all waste of time or money ect