Shaykh Uthman Al-Khamees answers the doubts spread by the Rawafidh, who accuse Muwaiyah رضي الله عنه of cursing Ali رضي الله عنه. #brohajji #muwaiyah #ali
No matter if you are Shia or Sunni, you have to respect Ali, he was born inside the Kaaba, he was raised by the hands of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), he fought fiercely for Islam against the kafirs alongside Muhammad (SAW) and he died in sajdah. Cursing him is extremely ignorant and shameful.
Muslims do not curse a common muslim what about companions, Rawafiz curse all day and night cursing is part of their life And what happened between Ali and muawaviyyah Its between them who the hell are Rawafiz, They will be asked both about that happened between them in aakhirah, During the battle thousands dies from both sides so its common sense that there would be some hatred betwenn the two parties and They had a reason for that we hv no reason to curse neither Ali nor Muawiya may Allah be pleased with them both .
@@AnnaQ-cm9vl Ahlul bayit Are prophets wiwes, Aal Ali,aal jafar,aal abas,aal aqeel, Stop using Your rafzi logic Here And u can not Defend Ahlul bayit With Fabricated Narrations and false intrepritations from Rafzi books, The simplest Way to declare Rafzis as hyppocritic mushriqs is That they Curse mothers of Believers, Because they are mother's of Believers not Mothers of Kuffar So kufar will curse and hate them And Momoneen love and respect Their mothers.
Al-Bukhaari (447) narrated from Abu Sa ‘eed al-Khudri, in the report about the building of the mosque (in Madinah), that he said: We would carry one brick at a time, but ‘Ammaar would carry two bricks at a time. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) saw him and brushed the dust from him, saying: “Woe to ‘Ammaar; he will be killed by the transgressing group; he will be calling them to Paradise and they will be calling him to Hell”. ‘Ammaar said: I seek refuge with Allah from tribulation. This was mention to mawiya who didn't like and said it was Ali who brought amar Ra with him in the battle so it's Ali who is responsible for his death ,when Ali Ra heard this he said so was prophet pbuh responsible for death of Hamza ??? The this puts everything into prospectus.
no one from Ahlu Al sunna said Muwaiya was not wrong. Literally all scholars by consensus say Muwaiya's ijtihad was wrong and he was the transgressor and that Ali ra was upon the Haq including shaykh Uthman in the video.
@@kenkaneki9138what muwaiya did was not ijtihad. only heirs can demand qisas. he’s not an heir of uthman to be demanding “accountability”. What he did was a sin and a grievous one at too and will be held accountable for it. Rasullah ﷺ : Whoever fights Ali, Has Fought me.
@@i.canalista7718 no, don't actually he smart than prophet muhammed when he die he left a successor but prophet muhammed didn't but even every pophet left a successor
@@asadbusiness8285 yes we all know this it was wrong and created the errosion and internal corruption of Islam. but this has nothing to do with the comment you made?
I really love the sahabah, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, and all of them; may Allah bless them all, those who understand the religion the most, those who love Allah and His Messenger the most. Indeed, I am not pleased with people who insult them.
Interesting how in the first minute when he mentions Muawiyah he says "may Allah be pleased with him" but mentions Ali alayhi-s-salam twice and says nothing Yes, I say alayhi-s-salam when mentioning members of the ahl al bayt, because that's what even Imam al Bukhari used to do, and other scholars as well, and you can even see it in sahih al bukhari
@AbdulRahman-ci9rf You really think I'm required to force myself to love Abu Bakr more just because our aqidah states that he is the best of the sahaba? Are you gonna do takfir upon me because my heart chose to love Ali more? You gonna call me a shia? You gonna show me how ignorant you are mister shaykh al Islam?
He is a scholar. He is from the students of Sheikh Uthaymeen - رحمه الله - and has been praised by the scholars of Kuwait and sat with Sheikh Muhamed Bazmool - حفظه الله - in a knowledge conference.
*_It was narrated from Sadaqah bin Al-Muthanna: Riyah bin Al-Haarith told me, that Al-Mugheerah bin Shu'ba (RA) was in the Great Mosque and the people of Koofah were with him, to his right and left. A man called Sa'eed bin Zaid (RA) came to him and Al-Mugheerah (RA) greeted him and seated him by his feet on the couch._* *_Then a man of Koofah came and turned to Al-Mugheerah (RA), and started spouting insult. Sa'eed (RA) said: "Who is this man reviling, O Mugheerah? He said: "He is reviling Ali bin Abi Talib." He said: "O Mugheer bin Shu'b, O Mugheer bin Shu'b" - three times, "why do I hear the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) being reviled in your presence and you do not object or try to stop?_* *_I bear witness about the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), that my ears heard and my heart understood it from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), and I have never narrated any lie about him that he would hold against me if I met him, (I bear) witness that he said: 'Abu Bakr will be in Paradise, Umar will be in Paradise, Ali will be in Paradise, Uthman will be in Paradise, Talha will be in Paradise, Az-Zubair will be in Paradise, Abdur Rahman will be in Paradise and Sa'd bin Maalik will be in Paradise,' and the ninth of the believers who will be in Paradise - if you want me to name him, I shall name him."_* *_The people in the mosque started arguing him, raising voices, adjuring him: "O Companion of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), who is the ninth?"_* *_He said: "As you have adjured me by Allah, and Allah is Almighty, I am the ninth of the believers, and the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is the tenth." Then he followed that with an oath: "By Allah, one action of one of them who went out on campaign once and got his face dusty when he was with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is better than all the actions of one of you, even if he were to live as long as Nooh (AS)."_* *[Musnad Ahmed, Hadeeth No.1629 (Saheeh)]*
Muawwiyah was probably not insulting himself but he used to sit in reunions and gatherings where Ali was insulted and he used to enjoy it, or at least he was not preventing them from doing so. This is stated in Sunan Ibn Majah.
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf Brother forget ibn majah read Sahih muslim 6220 and 6229, and if you want to enlighten urself further read sahih muslim 4776 In Sha Allah you will start to realise the true issue, Take these three to any scholar and they will start to justify them and if they are truthful they will accept the truth.
WAllahi how can you praise and love the opressors of Ahl Al Bayt? May Allah curse EVERY supporter of Muawiyah WHO PERFECTLY KNOWS what he had done. WAllahi you are lost. And it has nothing about being suuni or shia You CANNOT defend Muawiyah and certainly not Yazid
Brother it was muwaviya radiallahu tallah anhu who narrated the hadith of Ali radiallahu tallah anhus relationship to rasoolallah salallahu alaihi wasallam as like Musa as to harun as.
@@Hamzamalikyaqoob these people form big lies and never read books yet claim to love Prophet Sallallahu alaihi wasallam. It's so depressing to see. It shocking how they are falsely Changing the narrator.
Answer this question please. Who killed the sahabi Hujr bin Adi. Why was his tongue cut. Also on the side lines who killed Muhamamd bin Abu Bakr son of the 1st khalifa Abu Bakr Siddiq.
Instead of Defending Mua"wiya r.a we should defend Ali r.a and ahlul bait and show true love towards Ahlul Bait as ahle sunnah followers. There is a trend now to defend Muwaiya ra but not showing full picture
@The cool Deen Bro Ali (RA) was the best. We will always prefer him over Muawiyah (RA). But we have to defend Muawiyah (RA) from false accusations too. Look around and see how many people are cursing or accusing Ali (RA)? Not very many but there are many who are cursing and accusing Muawiiyah (RA) and many other Sahaba even greater than Muawiyah.
What do you mean "instead of defending معاويه رضي الله عنه" Muawiya is also a sahabi he deserves all the respect like Ali رضي الله عنه. Whatever you said is not from Islam and you're just creating fitnah!
@@sorandomthings2222 Ali RA was from the first muslims and was a khalifa Rashid, surely he has a higher status than Muawiyah RA who was from the last converts
Sunan Ibn Majah 121: “They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry” Sunan an-Nasa'i 3006: “They are afraid of Muawiyah.'… They are forsaking the Sunnah out of hatred for Ali.'" Cursing continued deep into the Ummayid dynasty. Sahih Muslim 2409: “A person from the offspring of Marwan (9th Khalifah) was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab.” Sunan Ibn Majah 114: “'Ali said: The Unlettered Prophet informed me (saying) that none but a believer would love me and none but a hypocrite would hate me”
How can companions of the beloved prophet curse each other? is that what prophet tauhgt them? istaggirullah and if Muawiyah curse Ali then how is it possible for Hasan to give Muawiyah khilafa and how is it possible for Haasan and Hussain to respect Muawiyyah? so your quotations do not make sense and are fabricated lies.
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy did he give it to muawaiyah willingly? Or did he give it to him at the threat of being murdered? Was his army not bridged, was he not slashed while on his prayer mat? Go read some history and it will all make sense.
@@trailblazer7108 oh really Hasan was scared of being killed? you are insulting him! on the principle they prefered death over life. seems you have learned nothing from the sacrifice of hussian. sorry i have no time to read shia histiry full of lies and illogical statements.
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy is the battle of siffin not clear enough to depict the hatred against Hazrat Ali as for you? Are u too dumb to understand? Hatred and jealousy ran in their family blood and so his son was raised to to be a greater tyrant May Allah Curse him until Qayamat for what he did to the Ahlubayt
Nothing is cleared. He didnt even mention one of the historical sources. He just dismissed them in the beginning. The Hadith in Sahih Muslim is nothing compared to what the historical sources say about Muawiya. The problem ist most muslims do not read their own history. If they actually read books instead of listening to Scholar XYZ the truth would come to light very fast.
@@user-dl5ln3wd6f So based off that premise, do you then reject all historical accounts of the primary historical sources? Nevertheless, even in the Sihah there are proofs that Muawiya hated Ali and wanted him cursed. But I was speaking from a historical perspective. You cannot evaluate history like fiqh. There are different historical accounts from different regions in the Islamic empire and its different groups and participants. You have to evaluate and see why people narrated stories and events. The majority of the Salafi opinion about the time of Ali ibn Abi Talib relies on accounts of Saif ibn Umar. Research this man and you will see how many of today's spread opinions come from him solely. People are forced into thinking I have to love Muawiya and can't denounce Aisha, Talha and Zubayr to be a good Sunni. There were Sahaba, Tabiin and sunni scholars in history denouncing and criticizing all of them. Regarding Muawiya even cursing him and doing Takfir on him. But people think if they are Sunnis they can't say any of these things. Well, history is against such people in this case.
Being from Manhaj of Ahlus Sunnah & i listen this shaykh and no doubt i respect him a lot but here shaykh denied the truth, Muawiyah ibn Sufiyan used to curse Ali عليه السلام on pulpits it's in our books (books of Ahlus Sunnah) our Manhaj loves Ahlulbayt and sahaba both, but the sahaba who loved Ahlulbayt, Ali عليه السلام didn't pledged Abu Bakr Al-siddique رضي الله عنه for 6 months, you'll not get 1 hadith that Abu Bakr Al-siddique رضي الله عنه said anything or criticised Ali عليه السلام for not pledging, these are companions of RasoolAllah ﷺ the real one's who loved Ahlulbayt عليهم الصلاة والسلام , May Allah ﷻ Raise us with Ahlulbayt and Khulafa e Rashideen عليهم الصلاة والسلام on the day of judgement, Ameen.
A question , what gave Mu’awiya the right to fight the legitimate Khalifa Ali which killed thousands of Muslims ? What gave Mu’awiya the right to rule the Muslims ? What right did he have ? What Sahaba chose him to rule over the Muslims ? What Shura ? You have to admit the fact that the status of Ali is so much higher than Mu’awiya ?
Hasan ra gave him the right to rule over muslims and no doubt Ali ra status is higher than muaviya ra but it doesn't mean anyone can now insult him And not only muaviya ra even Talha zubair ra also fought Ali because they demanded the killers of uthman ra
Did Mu’awiya have the right to fight Ali ? Did he have the right to prepare an Army to fight Hassan ? Did he have the right to pass leadership over to his Son ? And why didn’t Hussain give Baya to Muawaiya son ? The Sunni really need to ask questions as Ali , Hassan , Hussain and Fatima where highly highly regarded and loved by the Messenger
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf why would this change your answer, the truth is the truth and cannot be changed , why are you asking this question ? How if it relevant ?
Abu Huraira narrated: The Prophet (S) looked toward ‘Ali, al-Hasan, al-Husayn, and Fatimah, and said: "I am in the state of war with those who will fight you, and in the state of peace with those who are peaceful to you.” Sunni references: (1) Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p699 (2) Sunan Ibn Majah, v1, p52 (3) Fada’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p767, Tradition #1350 (4) al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p149 (5) Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haythami, v9, p169 (6) al-Kabir, by Tabarani, v3, p30, also in al-Awsat (7) Jamius Saghir, by al-Ibani, v2, p17 (8) Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v7, p137 (9) Sawai’q al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p221 (10) Talkhis, by al-Dhahabi, v3, p149 (11) Dhakha’ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p25 (12) Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tdadition #6145 (13) Others such as Ibn Habban, etc. It is the well-known fact in the history that Muawiyah fought Imam ‘Ali (as). And based on the above tradition of the Prophet(S) the Prophet has declared war on Muawiyah. How can we still love a person whom the Prophet has declared war on him? The Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever hurts ‘Ali, has hurt me"
1. There are many other sahih ahadiths that prove this, especially regarding Mugheera ibn Shauba also cursing Hazrat Ali. 2. Muawiya did not give Hassan and Hussaain 'benefits'. That was the portion that ALLAH has ordained for the Prophet and the Ahle Bait. 3. Abdullah Bin Abdul Wahab, author of Seerat e Rasol, son of Abdul Wahab Najdi, also writes in this book that cursing happened for many years after the Ali's death. And that Muawiya had just made the murder of Uthman R.A an excuse. Becuase no one was bought to justice for that murder even in Muawiya's rule. 4. Muawiya exhibited great pleasure at Hassan's poisoning. As reported in Sahih ahadiths. Lets not beat around the bush and bend over backwards to try and deny the truth, just because of our hatred of the rafadhis.
@@aman-yd4dw It is unfortunate that you consider the ahadith and the muhadiseen people that spread poision. Go read Bukhari 2812 and Muslim 4776. Alhamdullilah my imaan does not let me accept any Sheikh's opinon when it directly conflicts with the words the my Prophet S.A.W. Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust. Sahih Muslim 6229 Amir b. Sa'd b. Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya b. Abi Sufyan appointed Sa'd as the Governor and commanded: What prevents you from rebuking Abu Turab (Hadrat 'Ali), whereupon be said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said about him that I would not rebuke him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Aaron was unto Moses but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me. And I (also) heard him say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (the narrator) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Holy Prophet) said: Call 'Ali. He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: "Let us summon our children and your children." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family. Sahih Muslim 6220 Muhammad ibn al-Muthanna informed us that he heard from Abu Bakr al- Hanafi (Abdul Kabeer ibn Abdul Majeed) who heard from Bukayr ibn Mismar who heard Aamir ibn Sa’d saying, “Mu’awiya asked Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas, ‘What prevents you from abusing Ali ibn Abi Talib?’ Sa’d replied, ‘I do not abuse him as long as I remember three things that the messenger of Allah (a.s.) said (about Ali). If I had one of them, it would be better to me than red camels. I do never abuse him whenever I remember that when the Revelation came down and he (the Prophet) took Ali, his two sons, and Fatima and let them come under his garment, and then he said, ‘O Allah, these are my family and my household.’ I do never abuse him whenever I remember that when he (the Prophet) left him (Ali) behind in one of his battles and Ali said, ‘Do you leave me with children and women?’ He (the Prophet) said, ‘Are you not pleased to be to me as was Aaron to Moses except that there shall be no prophethood after me?’ And I do never abuse him whenever I remember the Day of Khaybar when the messenger of Allah (a.s.) said, ‘I will give this banner to a man who loves Allah and His messenger (and whom Allah and His messenger love) and at whose hands Allah will grant victory.’ We all looked forward to it, but he (the Prophet) said, ‘Where is Ali?’ They said that he had sore eyes. He asked to call him to come. When he (Ali) came, he (the Prophet) spat in his eyes and gave him the banner, and then Allah granted victory at his hands.’ *The narrator added, ‘By Allah, Mu’awiya did not mention him (Ali) with any word until he left Medina.’” * Sunan Nisai - Khasais e Ali Hadith 54 Go Read Musdarak lil Hakim - 6121
Its simple one of the conditions of the peace treaty between imam hassan and muwiyah was to stop.the cursing being done on the pulpits regarding his dad mola ali .
how do you defend these two hadiths please give me an explanation: 1. Sahih Muslim 4776 2. Abu Dawud 4131 3. Sahih Muslim 6229 I do not know how can you miss @bro Hajji, I give you the benefit of the doubt in this matter otherwise someone like you who does research can easily find out that what is preached in the video is not true and I would be very interested in knowing the explanation of these hadiths please, thank you.
Sheikh said that muviyah called abu turab coz it was the dearest name for Ali. Yes it is right but muaviyah and bani umayyah didn't know that it was dearest to Ali coz in muslim 6229 a person from banu marwan orders a sahabi to curse abu turab. If someone orders to curse a man then why it would be through his best name abu turab. Think about it. Now take a look at abu turab means the fellow of soil and Ali means the fellow of high virtues. So why someone call a his enemy a s the fellow of high virtuea, they would call them the fellow of soil coz they don't know from whom and how Ali got this title. In muslim 6229, that sahabi is literally explaining to that man of banu marwan that how Ali got the title of abu turab. So when banu umayyah says abu turan, this means they are saying this to disrespect Ali coz they can't say 'curse ali' coz Ali means the fellow of high virtues. So in muslim 6220 muaviyah adresses Ali as abu turab, which means what it means. And still you have confusion, then go and read the explaination of muslim 6220 by ibn taiymiyah. He would definitely clear your confusions inshallah
The narrarion he mentioned goes against where were xompanions. Treaty of hassan inckuded rhe condition of not cursing him. They recieved gifts for reasons that allow recoeving gifts from zalim
By your logic, if both were respecting each other and liking each other. Why fight each other? Bros were like 'it is business' ? Another thing i noticed in Arabs is that their fighting etiquette are diff, a bit civilised with respect and dignity.
Ali bhai ? That lunatic who is not a scholar and has no study under any shiekh. Does not know arabic ? Preach from his small room and run away when he has to face real scholar what an ignorant man ur following
Honestly we need to stop sugarcoating things. There is no way there was "love" between Ali and Mu'awiya. I like Othman Khamees but he does often say things which go beyond reasonably giving the benefit of the doubt or thinking the best of individuals. Of course we can reject that Mu'awiya cursed Ali, but to say there was love between them is far-fetched. They fought the first inter-Muslim battle between eachother where literally THOUSANDS of Muslims were killed. No way do you both just brush that off and have "love" for eachother. Also, Ali saying it was "Manafiyya" that caused Mu'awiya to kick the guy out of the sitting is not necessarily a sign of respect for Ali nor is it a sign of Ali acknowledging Mu'awiya respects him. It may just be in the same way Abu Baker's tribe protected him despite him being a Muslim based on his lineage. It is loyalty to their blood in front of outsiders who insult someone linked to them by blood; not love for eachother. We need to stop sugarcoating it because then we become almost as deluded as the Rafidhis. We can love Ali and Mu'awiya without pretending they loved eachother
@@Ismail-fv8dq there was no hatred as a muslim but lets be honest. Mu'awiyah and Ali went to war .. there were major tensions between them. Thats because Mu'awiyah refused to give to Bayah to Ali until he revenged the death of Uthman, which is a type of rebellion against Ali. But we should not doubt Mu'awiyahs Islam, and we leave his mistakes up to Allah.
@@sheriefelsayad5578 Ofcourse, I never said Muawiyah (ra) was in the right in terms of these wars. He was wrong for his decision, but some people need to understand that just because he fought Ali (ra), this doesnt necessarily mean that he had strict hatred towards Ali (ra), nor did Ali (ra) have strict hatred towards Muawiyah (ra). But as you said, we ask Allah to forgive him as there was a misunderstanding. At the end of the day, they both sacrificed greatly for Islam.
Okey I understand, but If we know that , Ali ibn Abu talib was the beloved was Allah and his Prophet , and he was one of the 4 greatest Muslim so shouldn’t it the best go surrender and not engage in war , because Ali ibn Abu talib is not only sahaba but ahlul bait and one of the most loved one , I don’t know but don’t you think that’s is more pure to surrender or just give to Ali out of love of Rashool Allah instead of engaging in fight with the love of Rashool Allah PBUH
Sheikh you know what ,Ali R.A used to pray qunoot nazila against Muawiyah and his supporters for what he did...Still you will say they loved each other...
Treaty of Hasan mentioned a point that Muawiyah will not appoint his son as his successor but unfortunately Muawiyah appointed his son Yazid as his successor just before his death...Will you still side with Muawiyah...The biggest irony is that you are not ready to call a spade a spade.. Truth alone triumphs.. Do whatever you guys want to do to prove Muawiyah right..
It is unfortunate to see that even knowledgeable people today are doing tawil of these things... Even ibn taymiyyah wrote that muawiyah orderd saad to sabb Ali and this is clear in context and wording. First of the word امر that is muawiyah ra commanded him and second by saad saying i will never do it. Moreever the wording of in Sunan ibn Majah is also further supports the clear context and theme. حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ سَابِطٍ، - وَهُوَ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ - عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ، قَالَ قَدِمَ مُعَاوِيَةُ فِي بَعْضِ حَجَّاتِهِ فَدَخَلَ عَلَيْهِ سَعْدٌ فَذَكَرُوا عَلِيًّا فَنَالَ مِنْهُ فَغَضِبَ سَعْدٌ وَقَالَ تَقُولُ هَذَا لِرَجُلٍ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ يَقُولُ مَنْ كُنْتُ مَوْلاَهُ فَعَلِيٌّ مَوْلاَهُ " . وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ " أَنْتَ مِنِّي بِمَنْزِلَةِ هَارُونَ مِنْ مُوسَى إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ لاَ نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي " . وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ " لأُعْطِيَنَّ الرَّايَةَ الْيَوْمَ رَجُلاً يُحِبُّ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ " ." It was narrated that Sa`d bin Waqqas said: "Mu`awiyah came on one of his pilgrimages and Sa`d entered upon him. They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry and said: 'Are you saying this of a man of whom I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: "If I am a person's close friend, `Ali is also his close friend." And I heard him say: "You are to me like Harun was to Musa, except that there will be no Prophet after me." And I heard him say: "I will give the banner today to a man who loves Allah and His Messenger." Sahih (Darussalam) English : Vol. 1, Book 1, Hadith 121 Arabic : Book 1, Hadith 126 Sunan Ibn Majah. Also people cursing Ali ra is clearly mentioned with the word of curse in the wording of sahi Muslim from the people of aali marwan and also the narration mentioned in abu dawud about fulan speaking bad of ali and syed bin zaid rebuking that person, it is mentioned by name in sunan al kubra that the person was mugheerah bin shubah who commanded to curse ali. and muawiyah ra was present. Bro hajji, we see well researched videos from you but on this one you seem to not well researched here. I hope you will dedicate a complete lecture on this if you feel i have misinterpreted my sources here... Or you will consider that defending something by hiding facts will make us look bad in the eyes of neutral people. Of course there are ways to defend companions from the rafidah fools by being objective. Saying people use abu turan as good gesture always id ignorance of the hadith in sahi muslim where it is mentioned that a man asked to curse abu turab.
Bruh you used the Ibn Majah which includes Abdur Rahman ibn Sabit who is known for irsal. Yahya ibn Maeen said Ibn Sabit never heard this from Saad ibn Abi Waqqas RA
Not to mention you referenced darussalams grading on this. You do know darussalam is a publishing house and not a author, narrator or scholar. That's kind of hilarious
U don't need to take over what a scholar explains. Sheikhs explain the events based on their madhab. Make ur research and read the history from all resources without prejeduce.
@@Unknown_.01 How can u search the history and your religion if u belong to a madhab, in this case salafi. If u r salafi then u r chained to the salafi books. If u don't then u r not salafi. So you r contradicting ur self. I recommend u to not relate to anyone except Allah and his Koran. If a scholar says alligns to the Koran is OK. If its not just throw it even he is the biggest salafi shaikh. Beleive Allah and ur brain.
@@MohamedSaid-ob3ug 😂😂😂😂😂 So you’re hadith rejector?? One of the dumbest of sects lol no offence I researched for years, and then became salafi upon finding they’re clearly upon the correct understanding of Quran. Alhamdulillah
@@Unknown_.01 hel no. Salafi is the most wrong hatefull sect in the Islam. I m not rejector of Hadith. I take only what alligns with the Koran. I used to be salafi like u but found out that most of their books are written under the watch of the rullers (ummayad and abbasid) back then. Those rullers were way far from hoest and held down any other group and commited horrible massacres like killing Hussain and destroying kaba, raping and killing ahla al Medina and fighting against Imam Ali, killing most of the sahaba ...etc. Salafi adore those criminals, love and take over the books tlhat are written under their surveillance. Please continue ur search. Allah might guid u to the right path
This scholar will also come up with explanations in praise of Yazeed bin Muawiya (lanatullah) and justify the killing of Prophet Muhammad (saww)'s family at Karbala
So you accept sahih Bukhari ?! You must accept this then don’t you ☺️ Ali at Omar’s deathbed, invoked Allah's Mercy for `Umar and said, "O `Umar! You have not left behind you a person whose deeds I like to imitate and meet Allah with more than I like your deeds. Sahih Bukari 3686, Book 62, Hadith 35 Sahih Muslim 2389a, Book 44 Hadith 18
@@Lessgoo531 subhanallah brother you got the wrong gist of me I'm from ahlus sunnah wal jamaa as well and I love khulafa e rashideen offcourse you didn't even bothered to read what 2812 hadith really is about did you now??
@@moizkhan8421 it's the one of the main problem this misguided people think everyone talking in favor of Ahlul Bait is a Rafidhi. When replied they don't come back .
@@Lessgoo531 What a fool you are making yourself? "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire." Tell us, is it a lie that the party that will kill Ammar is calling to hellfire? And who was the leader of that rebellious aggressive party I wonder. Don't fall for wahhabi salafi lies. You don't have to be a rafidi to acknowledge the misdeeds of Umayads
Khalid said: Al-Miqdam ibn Ma'dikarib and a man of Banu Asad from the people of Qinnisrin went to Mu'awiyah ibn AbuSufyan. Mu'awiyah said to al-Miqdam: Do you know that al-Hasan ibn Ali has died? Al-Miqdam recited the Qur'anic verse "We belong to Allah and to Him we shall return." A man asked him: Do you think it a calamity? He replied: Why should I not consider it a calamity when it is a fact that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to take him on his lap, saying: This belongs to me and Husayn belongs to Ali? The man of Banu Asad said: (He was) a live coal which Allah has extinguished. Al-Miqdam said: Today I shall continue to make you angry and make you hear what you dislike. He then said: Mu'awiyah, if I speak the truth, declare me true, and if I tell a lie, declare me false. He said: Do so. He said: I adjure you by Allah, did you hear the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) forbidding use to wear gold? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of silk? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of the skins of beasts of prey and riding on them? He said: Yes. He said: I swear by Allah, I saw all this in your house, O Mu'awiyah. Mu'awiyah said: I know that I cannot be saved from you, O Miqdam. Khalid said: Mu'awiyah then ordered to give him what he did not order to give to his two companions, and gave a stipend of two hundred (dirhams) to his son. Al-Miqdam then divided it among his companions, and the man of Banu Asad did not give anything to anyone from the property he received. When Mu'awiyah was informed about it, he said: Al-Miqdam is a generous man; he has an open hand (for generosity). The man of Banu Asad withholds his things in a good manner. Sunan Abu Dawood 4131 hadith
There is nothing to learn here. Please brothers and sisters, this is a point. Muwaiyah FOUGHT against his Khalifa of the time. He was in clear error. He FOUGHT against Ali which was way worse than CURSING Ali. There are many other hadith that claim that he insulted Imam Ali: Sunan Ibn Majah 121: “They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry” Sunan an-Nasa'i 3006: “They are afraid of Muawiyah.'… They are forsaking the Sunnah out of hatred for Ali.'"
Mashallah I used to be confused by the stories I heard of muawiyah cursing and usurping Ali Ra this is your great gift for me this Ramadan this understanding subhanallah
Bro muawiya broke the peace treaty that was set by imam Hassan ra which was to elect the next caliph but instead muawiya appointed his son yazid to become caliph is this not enough to show muawiyah had W one motives want makes u think he is innocent from curing imam Ali ra. And because of him appointing his son yazid to be become the rule many other ahlul bayt and sahaba were killed the blood is on both of their hands
@@Itsbuckjames this i s right. Muawia has appointed his son as next khalifat and therefor the treaty with Hassan was broken. This has initiated the war which led the killing of Hussain R.A. an his family. Beside that Yazid's army invated mecca and bombed the ka'ba with manjaniiq and invated Medina and killed a lot of sahaba and tabiiin and raped women 2-3 days under permission of Yazid. This was shocking to me but if I look back the history of Sufyan family I can only conclude that this family hated ahlu albayt and wanted to take revench of Badr battle.
You don't blame Ali(Ra) for coming to power by the help of rebels who killed uthman(Ra). Similarly muwaiyah (Ra) thought it's best that sahaba don't fight amongst themselves for rulership and he only appointed yazid with good intentions for the sake of Muslim unity and defeating Romans (as yazid had previously attacked Istanbul before and his dream was to defeat roman empire too but of course things didn't work out well). It's very easy to blame Ali, muwaiyah or even yazeed for the 2 fitnas but there's not much they could do really. Even Ali (Ra) didn't punish killers of uthman (Ra) who were in his army , that doesn't mean he is evil, people just don't know the circumstances and blame everything on rulers who had good intentions of stability and suppressing rebellions.
If Hazrat Muhaviya And Hazrat Ali were enemies then why son of Hazrat Ali Hassan ra sign agreement of peace with Muhaviya ra ?. No they were not enemies they were brothers.
He signed a peace agreement on the suggestion muawiya (ra) but with some conditions? Try learning about those conditions and breaking of those conditions led to karbala my friend
May Allah reward shaykh Khamees with good. He made an effective argument in defense of Muawiyah (rah). Nonetheless, his effort adds to the compounded evidence that the Qudaa in alliance with Muawiyah, especially Banu Kalb, were the chief propagators of cursing Ali (rah). Khamees' shows that cursing was circulating around Shaam, and Qudaa were the chief benefactors of turning Sahaba (rahm) against each other, weakening them. The departure of the Muslim Ummah, tye Prophet's (saws) Ummah, away from his Sunnah and the righteous caliphates (rahm), to become monarchies, were the machinations of Romanized Christian Arab tribes who newly converted, or remained Christian, but used Muawiyah for their ascendancy to power and authority over tye Muslim Ummah. These tribes manipulated Muawiyah. Sh. Khamees presents only one explanation for Muawiyah opposing allegiance to Ali (rah), but he ignores whst Amr ibn al As said and did at the mediation, and what happened to Ammar ibn Yasir (rah). And behind Amr deviation was Abu Sufyan's longstanding ties to Qudaa and Kalb. Abu Sufyan even owned land in Qudaa territory and Kalbites lived in a village on his land. According to Tabari, Abu Sufyan maintaining his highly acute drive for tribal leadership, and after Abu Bakr (rah) cut stipends to him, he pushed his son to go to Shaam and develop relations there. Because we know Muawiyah was a pauper in al Madinah but rich beyond his imaginatin in Shaam. At his death, he was tge biggest landowner of al Madinah and had built a Romanized palace on southwest shore of Galilee
Simple question to this person - sahih muslim 6229. What action did Muawiya take against Marwan the cursed ? This lack of action speaks louder than words.
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rfastagfirullah Brother you're everywhere defending nothing but Shames and curses,you seem nasbi to me,but I'll think best of you,I'll consider you as a lover of ahl e bait May Allah guide us Defend Sunan Abu Dawood,4131
@@kyunbhai49 My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides. Also recite this dua: اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ “O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.” I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded: The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous. The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility: (16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]." The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
If we admit that Muawiya cursed Ali than this assaults Hassan and Hussein, is not a proper methodological approach. Truth doesn’t care who it might offend anyway. First investigate the manner in and of itself. Did it happen or not? Then investigate the Hassan and Hussein issue separately.
Explain - when was this revenge for usman blood was taken because of which a man went ahead and fought with the khilifa of Muslims in the spam of 19 + 3.5 years of rule/A hadees says killing any one who stood against Khilafa/You have to justify ether explain when was the revenge taken or was it an excuse to raise mutiny against Ali. I am suspiciouos. The court of Humanity is suspicious./ His men were doing their job/ does a thief say that he has made a theft/You are lier to say that hasan and husai used to get benefit from cursed muawiya but it was what decided by Allaha in quran/it raises a question that either you have not read Quran or you are a Yahoodi who work against islam/muawiya was on the alm of son of ali/if you had read sulhe hasan where muawiya begged and his generation survived on the alm of son of ali/You are a yahoodi- son of a pig/This time you have spoken the truth that sahaba did not abuse each other which proves that muawiya was not a companion/muaviya target was not achived so he went on and continuted/have you read the hadees of mikhdaam who prooved the character protryed by cursed muaviya./most of the companions pleaged their alligience with this world/why no ond did because he used to kill muslims/you yahoodi such a big lier/i am not going to waste my time with satan. La haula wala quwwata ..........
"I swear by Allah in whose hand my life is that I am a Sunni Muslim who follows Qur'an and Sunnah and Salaf and I am not a Shia, and I don't do any shirk with Allah." Narrated Ibn Abbas(R): I was playing with children and Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya(bin Abu Sufiyan). I returned and said: He is busy in eating food. He(ﷺ) again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in eating food, whereupon he(ﷺ) said: May Allah never fill his stomach! ---[Sahih Al-Muslim 6628] Zirr reported: "Ali bin Abi Talib(R) said: (I swear)By Him Who split up the seed and created something living, the Prophet (ﷺ) gave me a promise that no one but a believer would love me, and none but a hypocrite would nurse grudge against me. " ---[Sahih Al-Muslim 78] Amir ibn Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan ordered Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas(R) and said: Why are you not abusing Abu Turab (i.e Ali Ibn Abi Talib(R)), whereupon he said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said about him that I would not abuse him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. (1) I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali(R) said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Harun was unto Musa but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me.(2) And I (also) heard him(Prophet (S)) say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (Sa'd) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Prophet(S)) said: Call 'Ali(R). He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (3)(The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: "Let us summon our children and your children." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family. ----[Sahih Al-Muslim 2404d] Narrated Zaid bin Arqam(R): from the Prophet (ﷺ): For whomever I am his Mawla then 'Ali is his Mawla. ---[Sunan At-Tirmidi 3713] Abu Yahya (Imam Tirmidhi) said this(hadith) is Hasan Saheeh Gareeb (Authentic) Shaikh Albani classified it as Saheeh (Authentic) --- "Here Mawla means leader" Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar ibn Yasir(R) used to carry two at a time. The Prophet(S) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah(and Paradise in other narration) and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire. ---[Sahih Al Bukhari 2812] During the battle of Siffin Ammar ibn Yasir was one of the commanders in the army of Ali ibn Abi Talib(A) and he was killed by man from the army of Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufiyan. Narrated `Ikrima bin Khalid: Ibn `Umar(R) said, "I went to Hafsa(wife of Prophet (S) and sister of Ibn Umar) while water was dribbling from her twined braids. I said, 'The condition of the people is as you see, and no authority has been given to me.' Hafsa said, (to me), 'Go to them, and as they (i.e. the people) are waiting for you, and I am afraid your absence from them will produce division amongst them.' " So Hafsa(R) did not leave Ibn `Umar(R) till we went to them. When the people differed. Muawiya addressed the people saying, "'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we(i.e Muawiya and his son Yazeed) are more rightful to be a Caliph than he(i.e Abdullah Ibn Umar(R)) and his father((Umar ibn Al Khattab (R))." On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), "Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)?" `Abdullah bin `Umar(R) said, "I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father(Abu Sufiyan) for the sake of Islam(i.e Ali(R)), is more rightful to be a Caliph(than you and your son),' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life)." Habib said, "You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so). ---- Sahih Al-Bukhari 4108 This incident took place after the death of Hasan ibn Ali(R) , when Muawiya broke Hasan-Muawiya treaty and appointed his son Yazeed ibn Muawiya as his successor in caliphate after him.
Than you are true ahli sunnah Who not inflict by nashibi influence... Look... How they deny the siffin war, which clearly state that the tyrant is LEADER to invite people to hell!!! And how they twisted the meaning For "not fulfilled the tyrant belly" As praised to the tyrant Cursing event to sayidina Ali was mutawatir!!! Not just sahih And still the speaker deceived the common umah... He who deny the crime of somebody He will burden the same crime as he defend Proved from the Quran him self QS 2:91
@@Faizayul Yes I like his videos may Allah bless him and guide others through him. I am from India, my family is Barelvi . I read Qur'an Translation in 2015 cover to cover, I was 17 years old back then . Then my Aqeedah got cleared . After that I studied the books of Sunan and asked Allah for guidance very much (even till this day Alhumdulillah) and I started Rafulyadain, and Praying like Prophet (S). My journey was long. I gave dawah to my family members some of them teased me that I became a wahabi, but some of them came to Qur'an and Sunnah Alhumdulillah.
@@abdullah_kurd what do you think by socially and economically boycotting Nasbis not making family relationships with them totally isolating them from Ummah. I think it's very effective way to teach them for challenging the truth however I am curious about how other brothers think about it.
Iman Ali (AS) was cursed by muawiya (ra) as well as by his governers There are hadith in muslim 6229 and 6220, 6220 hadith has the word تَسُبَّ and many nasbi's says they didn't curse iman Ali exactly, only ordered to criticize him,so I ask them is critisizing imam Ali a good deed? How much reward did it earn them? Mola Ali recited qunoot e nazla on muawiya ibn abu sufyaan ( ibn aby shaybah hadith 7123) During Muawiya ibn abu sufiyan's reign, the biddah of khutba of Eid before eid namaz was introduced,inorder to curse mola Ali because initially people would leave directly after namaz without listening to khutbah as it was just a cursing session Ammar bin yassir (ra) was martyred in the battle of siffin and there's hadith regarding it in bukhari 2812,may be the matter was ambiguous before it but after the killing of ammar,it was clear,Ali was on haq There are many more hadith which make it clear mu'awiyah was on wrong side and he did wrong with mola Ali, And Imam hassan (AS) agreed for the peace treaty on the request of mu'awiyah (ra), however few conditions were made,and all of those were broken by mu'awiyah,starting by nominating his son yazeed as khalifa and we all know what yazeed did,be it karbala or battle of Al-harra,I don't need to curse yazeed, because Allah has cursed his existence till Qayamah I won't curse mu'awiyah like shia's because I'm the real shia of Ali (AS),The biddah of cursing sahaba was started by banu ummaya,Mola Ali never did it neither he ordered anyone,he even behaved with kindness with khawarij and everyone Let's not forget,whosoever stayed silent during battles, were killed by banu ummaya example Abdullah ibn umar and he regretted it on his death bed In short,do your own research instead of blidnly listening to scholars and moreover, I'm not asking you to curse any sahaba but we need to learn our history,we need to learn from where did monarchy start, we're one ummah,we need to learn everything,not justify the mistakes of sahaba because they're not masoom, only prophet (AS) or other ambiya are masoom,no one else,so they too are humans We'll keep our attitude like Mola Ali, just be aware, be aware of the wrong doings but never curse them We cannot forget these things, Even Qura'an talks about brothers of yousuf (AS),how they wronged him,however they were forgiven but still we read about their actions in Qura'an from 1400 years,same is the case here
My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides. Also recite this dua: اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ “O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.” I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded: The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous. The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility: (16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]." The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
Hence, why I disagree with the Twelver doctrine. I am a Muslim just as Allah named us. (22.78). I recommend you check out the Shia reformist channel Al Islaah. Their ethos is Quran centricity and hadith that have 'authentic' grading but that which are in line with the Quran. And so they demonstrate major issues with the mainstream Twelver beliefs and practises, which are derived from the ghulat that got popular and mainstream. FYl, the ghulat are extremists whom the Shia Imams were against) themselves. Although I am not a shii, I do agree with much of what they say because it's what the Quran says. Where I differ with them is over 'authentic' hadith, especially when they admit that not only were the ghulat fabricating hadith, but that they were fabricating the isnaads (chains of narrators) also, to give the hadith its authenticity look. You should take a more hardline stance over the shii hadith corpus because I doubt its authenticity, and I am afraid to adopt the transmission of man who are susceptible to the whispers of devils. Allah says this is shirk in 6.121. So, since there's no divine approval for any of the hadith corpus' out there, I stick to the Quran for my guidance and the living tradition for my practise, the latter of which I acknowledge most likely didn't reach us unadulterated. So, I rely on Allah's Mercy for any shortcomings, considering I've come 1400 years after the Prophet. The authority is the Quran. It is the "best hadith" (39.23) and the most truthful hadith (4:87), that guides to the straightest way (17.9).
@@CordobaGeneral1234 hat Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire Read full hadith oh Munafiq...
@@pathan6135 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported that the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) said: A group would secede itself (from the Ummah) when there would be dissension among the Muslims. *_Out of the two groups who would be nearer the truth_* would kill them.
What a lie...🙉 What are the terms of pace treaty between Imam Hassan and Muawia? First, read it... After can discuss if Muawia courses Imam Ali or not.
@@user-dl5ln3wd6f no he was not.. check this if you read arabic مختصر منهاج السنة، لابن تيمية، تأليف الشيخ عبد الله الغنيمان: ج1، ص377. واما حديث سعد لما أمره معاوية بالسب فأبى، فقال: ما منعك أن تسب علي بن ابي طالب؟ فقال: ثلاث قالهن رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وسلم) فلن أسبه، لأن يكون لي واحدة منهن أحب إليّ من حمر النعم.....
Explanation is full of biasness and supports the neem nasbi people hidden among the sunnis. Mulla Ali Qari(ra) wrote in his sarah about Muwabiya(ra) that je was a baagi and he did it for Khilafah and qisas e uthman(as) was just a secondary issue
Can somebody find an explanation to this problematic incident between these two great Sahabah RadhiAllahhuanhuma - found it on a Shia website but even Sunnis (e.g. Engineer Mohammed Ali Mirza - see his TH-cam videos for his opinion on the subject) who call themselves "Hussaynis" (& regard those who do not criticise Yazeed & talk highly of him as well as those who do not rebuke Muawiyah for his (so called) "rebellion" against Ali as "Yazeedis") say the incident (as follows) proves Ali hated Muawiya for his battles against Ali (May Allah be pleased with them all): Shaykh Muqbil al-Wadi'i, may Allah be merciful to him, said in the footnote: As for la'n, we did not find any evidence of that in the reliable books of Sunnah, despite a long search. However, as for "praying against", it has been soundly reported from him (i.e. 'Ali), may Allah be pleased with him: Ibn Abi Shaybah (2/137) said: Hushaym - Husayn - 'Abd al-Rahman b. Ma'qil: "I performed the early morning prayer with 'Ali, and he did qunut, and he said in his qunut: 'O Allah, punish Mu'awiyah and his followers, and 'Amr b. al-'As and his followers, and Abu al-A'war al-Salmi and his followers, and 'Abd Allah b. Qays and his followers.'" Al-Bayhaqi (2/204) said, after recording part of it: "Sahih, well-known." And it is as he said in terms of authenticity, for it is upon the standard of the two Shaykhs. Now, there is a secret in this du'a of Imam 'Ali (peace be upon him) against Mu'awiyah and his followers. The supplication-against in the qunut is made against infidels only, and never against Muslims. This was the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family)...
Engineer Mirza is also a Rafdhi khabees. He is just pretending to be a Sunni to create doubts in the minds of common Sunni masses. Beware brother. Regarding your question, ask any good scholar who is well versed in these issues.
@@muhammadhaazim Personally I don't think he is Raafidhi Khabees but he is IMO extreme on trying to prove the worthlessness & evil of Muawiah RadhiAllahhuanhu, which is something Ahle Sunnat don't do. But Yazeed was a misguided leader & didn't deserve to be Ameer ul Mohmineen. Muawiah made yet another mistake by passing him the rule of Khilafah. After all look what happened in his time: Imaam Hussain Shahaadat, The incident of Al-harra in Medina etc.
@@mkhan9764 Brother no Sunni have those deviant beliefs like Engineer Mirza has. Only Shia endorses and supports him. Regarding Yazeed, nobody is supporting him here. But Regarding Hazrat Muaviyah (RA), he is a Sahabi Nabi (SAW) and Ahle Sunnah will never ever tolerate anything against him. What happened between the Sahabas ( RA) who the hell are we to judge them or slander against them. Regarding whom Allah's Quran testifies that Allah is pleased with them. So Brother leave what doesn't concern you and listen real scholars to clear your doubts.
@@muhammadhaazim He is a lover of all the Sahabah except Muaviah RadhiAllahhuanhu TBF & that is because Muaviah fought Ali RadhiAllahhuanhu (which many Sunnis believe he was wrong for) & because he appointed Yazeed as his successor (which many Sunnis believe he was wrong for), who set up an environment in which Hussain RadhiAllahhuanhu was martyred, Madina was attacked etc. I do believe it's better not to dig up Muaviah's faults but it is OK to condemn Yazeeds Khilafah.
@@muhammadhaazim I give 2 people Great ulama ahli sunnah th-cam.com/video/NYvBqiaLzVU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7lzeNrweut0/w-d-xo.html Dr Adnan ibrahim th-cam.com/video/H44MTBwqadc/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/S0pP-1cjtdk/w-d-xo.html Syeh hasan ibn farhan al maliky
I feel like their is a trend of watering down the differences between the Sahaba which existed historically . They change the dynamics so their idea of them is higher but at the cost of historical truth. They went to War but then cursing seems out of character ? The prophet did say Ali will always be upon the truth and the only Hadith I can think of with muawiya is praying he never gets full after ignoring the prophets request. Sure some people say the prophet said something similar to a little girl but did that girl ignore the prophet or say she had something better to do ? The same thing happens between Fatima and umar. Isn’t changing the story so your belief is easier to digest haram ?
Historical truth which shias subjectively change to also fulfill their agendas and aqeedah. You go the opposite and inflate the ahlul bayt with so much ghuluw and then get riled up when war or hostility against them is mentioned. This is what shias dont get, the ahlul bayt were great people, they were people of great respect, but they were just people at the end of the day, just like the other sahaba. They werent immortal, nir could they conjure dragons or lions, nor do they have ability to predict the future or other supernatural ability. There is nothing historically in sunni, early shia or external orientalist sources that talk about them in that way. The historical version of the ahlul bayt were very different to the modern neo savafid shia version of who they were. When you realise the sunni islam draws its rulings and hadith more from history and treats or major islamic figures as human beings then you can understand the concept as to why they would fight with each other yet could also respect each other, they could make mistakes, they were human and they werent infallible
@@DaSauseHouse no offense buddy but saying "I'm from a sunni household..." is the fakest comment ever. If you're from a sunni household then I'm the Mehdi bruv. Also calling calling shias rafida and referring to then as friends? Which one is it? You.re like a 45 year old undercover cop at a festival trying his hardest to blend in and trying to be cool and not caught out. If you are a shia just say so, dont pull this taqiyyah crap. Also when hazrat Hasan abdicated the caliphate to Muawiya Ra, the contemporary shia made lanat upon him for being a coward and damaging the shia sect. Shiasm = political sect. At the point of saqeefah and early shia literature we worshipped the same. Then came the random stories and hadiths, the turbah, selective interpretation of ghadir, of karbala, of fadak, the institutionalised cursing of the Rashidun (which persists to this day), the fire walking, the mud crawling, the combining of persian majoosi customs into islam (nowruz), the salaat of people (salatul jafar/fatima) etc... none of these things, by the way, was done by our Nabi al mustafa SAW. Save your breath before trying to refute obscure or daeef hadiths from sunni sources. If you have an issue then it should be from the 4 madhabs as that is the pervading ulema of sunni thought. Dont quote some nasibi rubbish and try and make it sunni
@@friedeggswithbeef Assalamu Alikum brother. You seem knowledgeable. Can you answer this question I have and doubt in my mind? "You know I am skeptical about Muawiya (RA). Their are still doubts in my mind. Sheikh in the video said, how can Muawiya (RA) curse Ali (RA) when he called him Abu Turab which was one of his beloved titles. See, now I have seen this hadith, and after reading, it seems some people didn't know that Abu Turab was a title that Ali (RA) loved and embraced and so they used it to curse him. So is it possible that Muawiya (RA) also didn't know about it? Brothers help me rawafid put this doubt in my mind." sunnah.com/muslim/44/59
@@user-fo8yv4qm9t I agree it’s not right to criticize the Amir Al momineen. I dunno the context , I do know he criticized Ali as for not apprehending the killers of Uthman… who were in his army ( the khawarij) ..The khawarij assassinated Ali too…
@@chirazzk8095 no it was criticism in general,it is literally in muslim 6220 Go and read it And plz answer me were killers of usman (ra) killed by mu'awiyah bin Abu sufiyan? One of the reasons of assassination of Usman e ghani (ra) is Marwan,he was the governor of mu'awiyah (ra) Even mola Ali never forgave mu'awiyah,recited qunoot e nazila on him ( ibn abi shaybah,7123) and in other hadith of ibn abi shaybah,he said,"there will be verdict in the court of Allah on the judgement day between me and mu'awiyah" (I paraphrased it) Mola Ali was cursed ( nauzubillah) even during the khutbah of Eid, this is the reason why biddah of Eid khutba before Eid namaz was started in mu'awiyah 's reign Read muslim,6229 Bukhari 2812 Prophet literally cursed mu'awiyah Sahih Muslim, Book 45, Hadith 125 Did it come out to be true? Yes And it's reported in al-bidayah,that he used to eat 7 times a day and his still said,"by God,my belly is not full,but I'm tired" and due to his huge belly started the to give khutbah while sitting down,he was the one who started this biddah too Read hadith of ghadeer e khum,then you'll get to know loving and defending ahl e bait is the part of your imaan And we cannot provide the certificate to muawiya,if mola Ali never forgave him,because the ambiguity of the matter was cleared after the martyrdom of Ammar ibn Yasir(ra),a 90 year old sahaba who fought for imam Ali (AS),bukhari 2812 Therefore it's clear that imam Ali was on haqq
LOL do you people actually believe this rubbish? He fought against imam Ali as and didn’t pledge allegiance to him, but use to defend him? What are you people talking about. You are the reason people mock Islam. Mashallah he didn’t curse Imam Ali (As) but he only raised a sword against him (your fourth khalifa right) and with it killed many early Muslims. Your manhaj says shia are bad for cursing sahaba but killing Sahaba is fine, and almost virtuous. Alhamdulillah, Allah ﷻ keep me holding onto the true thaqalayn ya rabb
Actually no none of our Ahlus Sunnah scholar did this until recent times. One of our Muhaditheen was matyred for speaking truth his name is Nisai Rahimaullah. These people have nothing to do with Ahlus Sunnah Manhaj they are decievers and calling curse of Allah Azzawajal upon themselves no matter how much they dress like scholar they will never be guided unless they accept the truth.
Whilst the job of a good lawyer is to defend the position of his client and seek to defend him from all charges, what we have seen here is a scenario of a lawyer defending the indefensible Why would Mu’awiya want to know why Sa’d did not insult Ali? Was this a normal practice for the Muslims of the time? If so who used to curse Ali (as)?
What a silly nonsensical statement to make , coupled with a straw-man too , sheik uthman didn’t say no one cursed ali , in fact he did say in the video that it was indeed narrated that people did curse and insult ali , people attacked ali even in the council of muawiyah may allah be pleased with them both, the point was muawiyah never insulted ali , And never allowed ali to be insulted in his presence or council and kicked these people out, not that ali was never insulted by people, maybe actually pay attention to the point being made before attempting a silly response , muawiyah didn’t insult ali, it was never narrated that he did and it doesn’t make sense whatsoever
Some hypocrites and people who were angered by the murder of Uthman didn't like Ali because of his stance of not taking quick action. While Muawiya also disagreed with Ali on this matter, some people took it far. That doesn't make him, Muawiya, one of the people who insulted Ali just because of a disagreement
@@abbysheyba8421 Muawiya's demand of uthmans blood was a trick to fight imam ali, what do u think he's going to tell the people of sham to fight the rightful khalif because i want to rule instead... If u understand arabic go to sahih sunan ibn majah, authored by al-albani, in volume 1,page 58,hadith number 120.
@@abbysheyba8421 muawiya fought imam Ali based on the excuse of demanding the revenge for uthman's blood, but did he himself get revenge or justice when he became the caliph? Or was it all a ruse to become the ruler?
What kind of nonsense is this? If you are a sunni, you recognize Ali as rightfully guided. If you curse rightfully guided, what does that make you? Muawiyah cursed Ali. This is not disputed by anyone with half a brain. So if Ali is rightfully guided, and someone curses him, what is that person? Rightfully guided? I'd say no but..... make your own conclusions.
Good point made that ' not everything written is true' but the fact that Muawiya cursed Ali is there in black and white. Upto the point where Omar Abdullah Aziz (ra) banned this practice 6 generations after Muawiya died. They both loved each other. If you love another human you do not go to war with the intention to kill someone you love. Your idea of love is obscure. Fact of the matter is tribal pride kicked in. Muawiya a ummyad could not tolerate A Hashimite (Ali a.s) to rule over them once again. As his father Abu sufyan fought tooth and nail against Prophet (s.a.w). The disagreement with Ali a.s was to bring the murderers of Uthman to justice. How many of those did Muawiya bring to justice and courts when he was in power. None. It was just a excuse to wage an old fued with the Hashimite. Still had malice in their hearts. narrated to us Abdulmuhaymin ibn Abbas ibn Sahl ibn Sad: narrated to me my father, from my grandfather that the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) saw in his dream, Bani umayya clan jumping on his pulpit like monkeys. Thus he became so aggrieved by it that he never laughed as long as he lived and the Almighty Allah revealed the following verse: …and We did not make the vision which We showed you but a trial for men. Tabari
@@a.conandoyle The truth hurts when you read what happened in history. The actions of some are quite surprising. That's when you start name calling because you are defeated. So since you are a internet warrior and resort to name calling. Why do you call your father a zindeeq. Son of Misyaar Halala marriage. Or are you a son if a jihad al nikah marriage and your mum is like the runaway Shamima Begum
This is the best explanation. As a sunni I hold this view that muawyia had bad intentions and that's all. Bani ummayyed constantly targeted ahle bayt and murdered the descendents of the prophet.
Here are 12 pieces of evidence that show that Mu'awiya used to curse, and encourage the cursing of, Imam Ali b. Abi Talib. EVIDENCE 1 - IBN HAJAR AL-’ASQALANI ثم كان من أمر علي ما كان فنجمت طائفة أخرى حاربوه ثم أشتد الخطب فتنقصوه واتخذوا لعنه على المنابر سنة “Then it was the matter of Ali and a group of people fought against him, then the situation got more complicated and they began to belittle him and they made cursing Ali from the pulpits, a regular habit” Source - Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7 page 57 EVIDENCE 2 - MUHAMMAD ABU ZAHRA “And during the reign of Banu Umayya the dignity of Ali was attacked, he was cursed because Mu’awiya during his reign introduced the ugly bid`ah of cursing Ali. His successors continued this tradition until the reign of Umar bin Abdul Aziz. The tradition entailed cursing the Imam of Guidance Ali at the end of the Friday Sermons, the Sahaba’s remonstrations that this was wrong was ignored, Mu’awiya and his Governors refused to desist from their actions. Ummul’Momineen Salma (ra) wrote a letter to Mu’awiya and his respective Governors reminding them that by cursing ‘Ali they were in fact cursing Allah (swt) and his Prophet (s)”. Source - Ta’rikh Madhahib al-Islam, Volume 1 page 35 EVIDENCE 3 - AL-DHAHABI He has recorded the following statement of an important early Sunni scholar called Abd al-Rahman b. ‘Amr al-Awza’i (d. 157 H): سمعت الأوزاعي يقول : ما أخذنا العطاء حتى شهدنا على علي بالنفاق وتبرأنا منه Al-Awzai said: ‘We didn’t obtain gifts until we testified that Ali was a hypocrite and declared our disavowal towards him”. Source - Siyar A’lam al-Nubala, Volume 7 page 130 EVIDENCE 4 - AL-TABARI - A When Muawiya Ibn Abi Sufyan put al-Mughairah Ibn Shubah in charge of Kufah in Jumada 41 (September 2- October 30, 661), he summoned him. After praising and glorifying God, he said: “Now then, indeed a forbearing person has been admonished in the past… The wise might do what you want without instruction. Although I have wanted to advise you about many things, I left them alone, trusting in your discernment of what pleases me, what helps my regime and what sets my subjects [raiyyah] on the right path. I would continue to advise you about a quality of yours- do not refrain from abusing Ali and criticizing him, not from asking God’s mercy upon Uthman and His forgiveness for him. Continue to shame the companions of Ali, keep at a distance, and don’t listen to them. Praise the faction of Uthman, bring them near, and listen to them.” Source - History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH, Execution of Hujr Ibn Adi, v18, pp 122-123 EVIDENCE 5 - AL-TABARI - B “The Messenger of Muawiya then came to them (Ziyad) with orders to release six and to kill eight, telling them: We have been ordered to let you disavow Ali and curse him. If you do so, we shall release you, and if you refuse, we shall kill you. “ Source - History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH, v18, p149 EVIDENCE 6 - AHMAD B. HANBAL “From Abdillah al-Mazini who said: ‘When Muawiya left Kufa he employed al-Mughirah ibn Shubah. ’He said: al-Mughirah hired orators to insult Ali’.” Source - Musnad Ahmad, Volume 3 page 185 EVIDENCE 7 - HASAN B. FARHAN AL-MALIKI والي المدينة وهو مروان بن الحكم في زمن معاوية كان يسب ويأمر بسب علي على المنابر، هذه حقيقة تاريخية ثابتة “The governor of Madina, Marwan bin al-Hakam during the reign of Mu’awyia used to curse Ali and ordered the cursing of Ali from the pulpits; this is an affirmed historical fact.” Source - Nahw Inqad al-Ta’rikh, Volume 3 page 22 EVIDENCE 8 - MUSLIM B. HAJJAJ “The Governor of Medina who was one of the members of the house of Marwan called Sahl Ibn Sa’d, and ordered him to curse Ali. But Sahl refused to do so. The governor said: “If you don’t want to curse Ali, just say God curse Abu Turab (the nickname of Ali).” Sahl said: “Ali did not like any name for himself better than Abu Turab, and Ali used to become very happy when somebody would call him Abu Turab.” Source - Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of Virtues of Ali, Arabic version, v4, p1874, Tradition #38 EVIDENCE 9 - IBN TAYMIYYA وقد كان من شيعة عثمان من يسب عليا ويجهر بذلك على المنابر “There were from the followers of Uthman ones who used to abuse Ali openly from the Mosque pulpits” Source - Minhaj al Sunnah, Volume 6 page 201 وأما حديث سعد لما أمره معاوية بالسب فأبى “While the narration about Sa’d (relates to) when Mu’awyia ordered him to curse (‘Ali) but he refused” Source - Minhaj al-Sunnah, Volume 5 page 42 EVIDENCE 10 - AL-QURTUBI وقول معاوية لسعد بن أبي وقاص : ما منعك أن تسب أبا تراب ؛ يدل : على أن مقدم بني أمية كانوا يسبون عليا وينتقصونه “The statement of Mu’awyia to Sa’d bin Abi Waqas “What prevents you from cursing Abu Turab” indicates that the first generation of Bani Umayya would abuse and belittle Ali.” Source - Al-Mufhim, Volume 20 page 25 EVIDENCE 11 - IBN KATHIR فاشترط أن يأخذ من بيت مال الكوفة خمسة آلاف ألف درهم، وأن يكون خراج دار أبجرد له، وأن لا يسب علي وهو يسمع “He (Hasan) placed conditions of having five million from Kufa’s treasury, the income from the taxes of the city of Darabjird and not to curse Ali when he (al Hasan) could hear that” Source - Al Bidayah wal Nihayah, Volume 8 page 17 EVIDENCE 12 - IBN ‘ABD RABBIH “When Hassan bin Ali died, Mu’awyia performed the Hajj, and then entered into Madina where he wanted to curse Ali from Prophet’s pulpit, thus they said to him: ‘Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas is right here and he will not accept your behaviour, you should ask him first.’ Thus he sent for him and asked him about this to which he (Sa’d) said: ‘If you did it, I shall leave the mosque and never come here again.’ Thus Mu’awiya restrained himself from cursing (Ali) until Sa’d passed away, when Sa’d died, he cursed him (Ali) from the pulpit and also ordered his governors to curse him from the pulpits and they (his governors) did likewise. Then Umm Salama, the wife of the Prophet (pbuh), wrote to Mu’awyia saying: ‘You are cursing Allah and his Messenger from your pulpits and that is as a result of cursing Ali bin Abi Talib and his lovers and I testify that Allah and his Messenger love him.’ However he (Mu’awyia) didn’t pay any attention to her statement”. Source - al-’Iqd al-Farid, Volume 3 page 300
Everything above is true but you misquoted they weren't referring to muawiyyah radiallahuanhu rather referring to his followers who did the cursing and he muawiyyah radiallahuanhu would remain silent in fear of them turning against him further proving he was a king caliph not one of the rashideen Quran and sunnah he had his mistakes which we don't deny and he was a sahaba who had good character and piety When a sahaba make mistakes we take lessons from them not insult curse them and even if a sahaba is confirmed going jahannam we still love respect them as every muslim.enter jannah and even those sahaba do they will be of higher status then me and you
@@abdullahassaffahwhat to remain silent the maviyah rebel against hazrat ali to punish the killers of hazrat uthman but under his regin people where cursing hazrat ali and he was doing nothing ? A ruler is responsible in islam His governor Marwan use to abuse hazrat ali and he was sitting and watching this Did he remove Marwan from the position of governor?
@@userxyz1511 boycott these type of people economically and socially never give your sons and daughters for marriage to them. This is the only lesson they will leave this misguidance and admit the fact. The first reply is so sinful. That's insane. Even after giving a big sources still denying truth then they say " I LOVE NABI Sallallahu alaihi wasallam "
![Muawiyah [RA]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y3JMVu20E7E/mqdefault.jpg)
![Muawiyah [RA]](/img/tr.png)
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.76[2/2] เดินมาสิบกว่าป่า วันนี้รู้แล้วว่าโจโฉกลัวอะไร!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R7Yor-t2Au0/mqdefault.jpg)
Jazallah o khaira akhir, may Allah bless you and your family
No matter if you are Shia or Sunni, you have to respect Ali, he was born inside the Kaaba, he was raised by the hands of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), he fought fiercely for Islam against the kafirs alongside Muhammad (SAW) and he died in sajdah. Cursing him is extremely ignorant and shameful.
Muslims do not curse a common muslim what about companions, Rawafiz curse all day and night cursing is part of their life And
what happened between Ali and muawaviyyah Its between them who the hell are Rawafiz, They will be asked both about that happened between them in aakhirah,
During the battle thousands dies from both sides so its common sense that there would be some hatred betwenn the two parties and They had a reason for that we hv no reason to curse neither Ali nor Muawiya may Allah be pleased with them both .
@@Beingstudent005defending ahl e bait is part of our imaan
@@AnnaQ-cm9vl Ahlul bayit Are prophets wiwes, Aal Ali,aal jafar,aal abas,aal aqeel,
Stop using Your rafzi logic Here And u can not Defend Ahlul bayit With Fabricated Narrations and false intrepritations from Rafzi books,
The simplest Way to declare Rafzis as hyppocritic mushriqs is That they Curse mothers of Believers, Because they are mother's of Believers not Mothers of Kuffar
So kufar will curse and hate them
And Momoneen love and respect Their mothers.
He is the 1st imam.as selected by Allah.
@@user-eh2pv4sc7h
YES the book of refrence is "tale of Rafzis"
Al-Bukhaari (447) narrated from Abu Sa ‘eed al-Khudri, in the report about the building of the mosque (in Madinah), that he said: We would carry one brick at a time, but ‘Ammaar would carry two bricks at a time. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) saw him and brushed the dust from him, saying: “Woe to ‘Ammaar; he will be killed by the transgressing group; he will be calling them to Paradise and they will be calling him to Hell”. ‘Ammaar said: I seek refuge with Allah from tribulation.
This was mention to mawiya who didn't like and said it was Ali who brought amar Ra with him in the battle so it's Ali who is responsible for his death ,when Ali Ra heard this he said so was prophet pbuh responsible for death of Hamza ??? The this puts everything into prospectus.
@@8647-ux6yx so Hadith of prophet is nonsense? Astahfirulllah
no one from Ahlu Al sunna said Muwaiya was not wrong. Literally all scholars by consensus say Muwaiya's ijtihad was wrong and he was the transgressor and that Ali ra was upon the Haq including shaykh Uthman in the video.
@@umaydniassuh6511According to Nassibi yes it is.
@@kenkaneki9138Suyuti tareekh e Khulafa e Rashideen
@@kenkaneki9138what muwaiya did was not ijtihad. only heirs can demand qisas. he’s not an heir of uthman to be demanding “accountability”. What he did was a sin and a grievous one at too and will be held accountable for it. Rasullah ﷺ : Whoever fights Ali, Has Fought me.
Mu’awiyah RA did not curse Ali RA. However, other governors and even the masses during the Umayyad Khilafah unfortunately did.
Muawiyah know it he did not stop it also Infront of him Ali r.a was cursed mentioned in Hardee's.
Apple is Orange.
Try reading bukhari mate
@@user-fo8yv4qm9tand take it at face value? that's what you lot do
@@user-fo8yv4qm9tand take it at face value? that's what you lot do
ManshaAllah very good vídeo i learnt a lot
unlearn it, trust me
Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!
@@asadbusiness8285 did the abu bakr also rule like Daesh when he fought those who refused to pay him zakaat and taking their wives as slaves?
@@i.canalista7718 no, don't
actually he smart than prophet muhammed when he die he left a successor but prophet muhammed didn't but even every pophet left a successor
@@asadbusiness8285 yes we all know this it was wrong and created the errosion and internal corruption of Islam. but this has nothing to do with the comment you made?
I really love the sahabah, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, and all of them; may Allah bless them all, those who understand the religion the most, those who love Allah and His Messenger the most. Indeed, I am not pleased with people who insult them.
لعنت بر معاویه ابوبکر عثمان ایسه عمر اگه معاویه نبود داعش نبود
Oh well you need to read in your books what they did. The wrath of Allah is upon them. They disobeyed.
@@user-eh2pv4sc7h
May Allah save me from Hellfire, the eternal abode of Rafidi Mushriks
ALLAH yahfadhakum wa jamiil muslimin.
Informative❤
By Allah Swt this is how I love the Scholars to explain things.
May Allah preserve this shaykh and protect him
Well hes is just wrong, and may Allah Swt show this to you and him on the day of no return
th-cam.com/video/18IOhaNZWaI/w-d-xo.html
it exposed muwawiyah
Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!
@@asadbusiness8285 That Sahabi held the ummah together . cope
@@garsayfsomali didn't saw the video which i send
Interesting how in the first minute when he mentions Muawiyah he says "may Allah be pleased with him" but mentions Ali alayhi-s-salam twice and says
nothing
Yes, I say alayhi-s-salam when mentioning members of the ahl al bayt, because that's what even Imam al Bukhari used to do, and other scholars as well, and you can even see it in sahih al bukhari
I m sure you love our mother ayesha RA the same way
@@samikhann The same way? No. I respect her. But I love Khadija and Fatima way more.
Thar was correct
How can
Muslim said
Mau Alloh be please
To a leader who invited people to nar
@@rosenbaumquartz I hope you love Abu Bakr way more than Ali too by the same logic you are applying here
@AbdulRahman-ci9rf You really think I'm required to force myself to love Abu Bakr more just because our aqidah states that he is the best of the sahaba? Are you gonna do takfir upon me because my heart chose to love Ali more? You gonna call me a shia? You gonna show me how ignorant you are mister shaykh al Islam?
He is a scholar. He is from the students of Sheikh Uthaymeen - رحمه الله - and has been praised by the scholars of Kuwait and sat with Sheikh Muhamed Bazmool - حفظه الله - in a knowledge conference.
Yet he keeps making up lies to support wahhabism 🤦🏻♂️
th-cam.com/video/18IOhaNZWaI/w-d-xo.html
it exposed muwawiyah
Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!
@@asadbusiness8285 For you shariah is terrorisem
@@tenybhai
What is so wrong with Wahhabism? Can you tell me? I see people like you keep condemning it without mentioning the reasons.
*_It was narrated from Sadaqah bin Al-Muthanna: Riyah bin Al-Haarith told me, that Al-Mugheerah bin Shu'ba (RA) was in the Great Mosque and the people of Koofah were with him, to his right and left. A man called Sa'eed bin Zaid (RA) came to him and Al-Mugheerah (RA) greeted him and seated him by his feet on the couch._*
*_Then a man of Koofah came and turned to Al-Mugheerah (RA), and started spouting insult. Sa'eed (RA) said: "Who is this man reviling, O Mugheerah? He said: "He is reviling Ali bin Abi Talib." He said: "O Mugheer bin Shu'b, O Mugheer bin Shu'b" - three times, "why do I hear the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) being reviled in your presence and you do not object or try to stop?_*
*_I bear witness about the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), that my ears heard and my heart understood it from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), and I have never narrated any lie about him that he would hold against me if I met him, (I bear) witness that he said: 'Abu Bakr will be in Paradise, Umar will be in Paradise, Ali will be in Paradise, Uthman will be in Paradise, Talha will be in Paradise, Az-Zubair will be in Paradise, Abdur Rahman will be in Paradise and Sa'd bin Maalik will be in Paradise,' and the ninth of the believers who will be in Paradise - if you want me to name him, I shall name him."_*
*_The people in the mosque started arguing him, raising voices, adjuring him: "O Companion of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), who is the ninth?"_*
*_He said: "As you have adjured me by Allah, and Allah is Almighty, I am the ninth of the believers, and the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is the tenth." Then he followed that with an oath: "By Allah, one action of one of them who went out on campaign once and got his face dusty when he was with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) is better than all the actions of one of you, even if he were to live as long as Nooh (AS)."_*
*[Musnad Ahmed, Hadeeth No.1629 (Saheeh)]*
May Allah preserve the shaykh...May Allah aid the shaykh,,,may Allah support the shaykh.....Allahumma ameen!
Beautiful explanation ❤ May Allah bless you sheikh
Muawwiyah was probably not insulting himself but he used to sit in reunions and gatherings where Ali was insulted and he used to enjoy it, or at least he was not preventing them from doing so. This is stated in Sunan Ibn Majah.
Show me the word insult in the hadith of ibn majah
Dont let some random shiite scholar Brainwash you , there is no hadith that they were insulting
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf Brother forget ibn majah read Sahih muslim 6220 and 6229, and if you want to enlighten urself further read sahih muslim 4776 In Sha Allah you will start to realise the true issue, Take these three to any scholar and they will start to justify them and if they are truthful they will accept the truth.
Your heart is filled with hatred
He is the best wallahi may Allah bless the sheikh. let them who have hatred in their hearts for Muawiya or Ali burn we love them both ra.
WAllahi how can you praise and love the opressors of Ahl Al Bayt? May Allah curse EVERY supporter of Muawiyah WHO PERFECTLY KNOWS what he had done.
WAllahi you are lost. And it has nothing about being suuni or shia
You CANNOT defend Muawiyah and certainly not Yazid
th-cam.com/video/18IOhaNZWaI/w-d-xo.html
it exposed muwawiyah
Brother it was muwaviya radiallahu tallah anhu who narrated the hadith of Ali radiallahu tallah anhus relationship to rasoolallah salallahu alaihi wasallam as like Musa as to harun as.
@@mehran598hahaha lol it was saad ibn abi waqas who narrated that hadith, get your facts rights dude
@@Hamzamalikyaqoob these people form big lies and never read books yet claim to love Prophet Sallallahu alaihi wasallam. It's so depressing to see. It shocking how they are falsely Changing the narrator.
Ma Sha Allah beautifully explained
th-cam.com/video/18IOhaNZWaI/w-d-xo.html
it exposed muwawiyah
Salaam. Give me the TH-cam link for the intro Nasheed please.🙏
متاهات الحياة
th-cam.com/video/ETMOU1MaM9w/w-d-xo.html
Answer this question please. Who killed the sahabi Hujr bin Adi. Why was his tongue cut.
Also on the side lines who killed Muhamamd bin Abu Bakr son of the 1st khalifa Abu Bakr Siddiq.
Great
Instead of Defending Mua"wiya r.a we should defend Ali r.a and ahlul bait and show true love towards Ahlul Bait as ahle sunnah followers. There is a trend now to defend Muwaiya ra but not showing full picture
@The cool Deen
Bro Ali (RA) was the best. We will always prefer him over Muawiyah (RA). But we have to defend Muawiyah (RA) from false accusations too. Look around and see how many people are cursing or accusing Ali (RA)? Not very many but there are many who are cursing and accusing Muawiiyah (RA) and many other Sahaba even greater than Muawiyah.
@@wb3123 Muawiya used to curse Ali I have a bunch of sources from Sunni books
@@tz6706 hahahah 😆
Good Joke
What do you mean "instead of defending معاويه رضي الله عنه" Muawiya is also a sahabi he deserves all the respect like Ali رضي الله عنه. Whatever you said is not from Islam and you're just creating fitnah!
@@sorandomthings2222 Ali RA was from the first muslims and was a khalifa Rashid, surely he has a higher status than Muawiyah RA who was from the last converts
Sunan Ibn Majah 121: “They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry”
Sunan an-Nasa'i 3006: “They are afraid of Muawiyah.'… They are forsaking the Sunnah out of hatred for Ali.'"
Cursing continued deep into the Ummayid dynasty.
Sahih Muslim 2409: “A person from the offspring of Marwan (9th Khalifah) was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab.”
Sunan Ibn Majah 114: “'Ali said:
The Unlettered Prophet informed me (saying) that none but a believer would love me and none but a hypocrite would hate me”
How can companions of the beloved prophet curse each other? is that what prophet tauhgt them? istaggirullah and if Muawiyah curse Ali then how is it possible for Hasan to give Muawiyah khilafa and how is it possible for Haasan and Hussain to respect Muawiyyah? so your quotations do not make sense and are fabricated lies.
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy did he give it to muawaiyah willingly? Or did he give it to him at the threat of being murdered? Was his army not bridged, was he not slashed while on his prayer mat? Go read some history and it will all make sense.
@@trailblazer7108 oh really Hasan was scared of being killed? you are insulting him! on the principle they prefered death over life. seems you have learned nothing from the sacrifice of hussian. sorry i have no time to read shia histiry full of lies and illogical statements.
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy is the battle of siffin not clear enough to depict the hatred against Hazrat Ali as for you? Are u too dumb to understand? Hatred and jealousy ran in their family blood and so his son was raised to to be a greater tyrant May Allah Curse him until Qayamat for what he did to the Ahlubayt
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy not a Shia but imam Hassan AS was forced to do sulah Hassan otherwise he was ready with his 40000 soldiers
What a great explanation to the commonly misquoted hadith. All doubts cleared MashaAllah.
May Allah bless Shaykh immensely.
Nothing is cleared. He didnt even mention one of the historical sources. He just dismissed them in the beginning. The Hadith in Sahih Muslim is nothing compared to what the historical sources say about Muawiya. The problem ist most muslims do not read their own history. If they actually read books instead of listening to Scholar XYZ the truth would come to light very fast.
@@metinmetin1246
The problem is that the so-called historical sources are not part of our authentic sources like the Hadith Collections.
@@user-dl5ln3wd6f
So based off that premise, do you then reject all historical accounts of the primary historical sources? Nevertheless, even in the Sihah there are proofs that Muawiya hated Ali and wanted him cursed. But I was speaking from a historical perspective. You cannot evaluate history like fiqh. There are different historical accounts from different regions in the Islamic empire and its different groups and participants. You have to evaluate and see why people narrated stories and events. The majority of the Salafi opinion about the time of Ali ibn Abi Talib relies on accounts of Saif ibn Umar. Research this man and you will see how many of today's spread opinions come from him solely. People are forced into thinking I have to love Muawiya and can't denounce Aisha, Talha and Zubayr to be a good Sunni. There were Sahaba, Tabiin and sunni scholars in history denouncing and criticizing all of them. Regarding Muawiya even cursing him and doing Takfir on him. But people think if they are Sunnis they can't say any of these things. Well, history is against such people in this case.
@@metinmetin1246can you pls mention me sunni scholars who denounced Aisha, Talha and Zubayr or criticised them
Good Sunni analysis of the Hadith. Alhumdullilah.😎👌👍
No. It's not . Go read Ahlus Sunnah Sahih Hadith books you will find out.
Mash Allah
Ameen
What's the nasheed in the intro
th-cam.com/video/dqutWT8aXhU/w-d-xo.html 0:50 should be familiar to you
Being from Manhaj of Ahlus Sunnah & i listen this shaykh and no doubt i respect him a lot but here shaykh denied the truth, Muawiyah ibn Sufiyan used to curse Ali عليه السلام on pulpits it's in our books (books of Ahlus Sunnah) our Manhaj loves Ahlulbayt and sahaba both, but the sahaba who loved Ahlulbayt, Ali عليه السلام didn't pledged Abu Bakr Al-siddique رضي الله عنه for 6 months, you'll not get 1 hadith that Abu Bakr Al-siddique رضي الله عنه said anything or criticised Ali عليه السلام for not pledging, these are companions of RasoolAllah ﷺ the real one's who loved Ahlulbayt عليهم الصلاة والسلام , May Allah ﷻ Raise us with Ahlulbayt and Khulafa e Rashideen عليهم الصلاة والسلام on the day of judgement, Ameen.
Subhan Allāh ﷻ.. One Of The Best Explanation 🖤
Guess using brains is difficult for wahhabis if this is the best explanation 😅
@@slothinator5552 ibn taimiyah in minhaj al sunnah refutes it by saying that muawiyah indeed ordered cursing imam Ali!
@@tenybhai i became shia now akhi, dont worry about me now may Allah bless you for your dawah ❤
وَبَعْدَ السَّبْتِ، عِنْدَ فَجْرِ أَوَّلِ الأُسْبُوعِ، جَاءَتْ مَرْيَمُ الْمَجْدَلِيَّةُ وَمَرْيَمُ الأُخْرَى لِتَنْظُرَا الْقَبْرَ.
2 وَإِذَا زَلْزَلَةٌ عَظِيمَةٌ حَدَثَتْ، لأَنَّ مَلاَكَ الرَّبِّ نَزَلَ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ وَجَاءَ وَدَحْرَجَ الْحَجَرَ عَنِ الْبَابِ، وَجَلَسَ عَلَيْهِ.
3 وَكَانَ مَنْظَرُهُ كَالْبَرْقِ، وَلِبَاسُهُ أَبْيَضَ كَالثَّلْجِ.
4 فَمِنْ خَوْفِهِ ارْتَعَدَ الْحُرَّاسُ وَصَارُوا كَأَمْوَاتٍ.
5 فَأَجَابَ الْمَلاَكُ وَقَالَ لِلْمَرْأَتَيْنِ : «لاَ تَخَافَا أَنْتُمَا، فَإِنِّي أَعْلَمُ أَنَّكُمَا تَطْلُبَانِ يَسُوعَ الْمَصْلُوبَ.
6 لَيْسَ هُوَ ههُنَا، لأَنَّهُ قَامَ كَمَا قَالَ! هَلُمَّا انْظُرَا الْمَوْضِعَ الَّذِي كَانَ الرَّبُّ مُضْطَجِعًا فِيهِ.
7 وَاذْهَبَا سَرِيعًا قُولاَ لِتَلاَمِيذِهِ: إِنَّهُ قَدْ قَامَ مِنَ الأَمْوَاتِ. هَا هُوَ يَسْبِقُكُمْ إِلَى الْجَلِيلِ. هُنَاكَ تَرَوْنَهُ. هَا أَنَا قَدْ قُلْتُ لَكُمَا».
8 فَخَرَجَتَا سَرِيعًا مِنَ الْقَبْرِ بِخَوْفٍ وَفَرَحٍ عَظِيمٍ، رَاكِضَتَيْنِ لِتُخْبِرَا تَلاَمِيذَهُ.
9 وَفِيمَا هُمَا مُنْطَلِقَتَانِ لِتُخْبِرَا تَلاَمِيذَهُ إِذَا يَسُوعُ لاَقَاهُمَا وَقَالَ: «سَلاَمٌ لَكُمَا». فَتَقَدَّمَتَا وَأَمْسَكَتَا بِقَدَمَيْهِ وَسَجَدَتَا لَهُ.
10 فَقَالَ لَهُمَا يَسُوعُ: «لاَ تَخَافَا. اِذْهَبَا قُولاَ لإِخْوَتِي أَنْ يَذْهَبُوا إِلَى الْجَلِيلِ، وَهُنَاكَ يَرَوْنَنِي».
11 وَفِيمَا هُمَا ذَاهِبَتَانِ إِذَا قَوْمٌ مِنَ الْحُرَّاسِ جَاءُوا إِلَى الْمَدِينَةِ وَأَخْبَرُوا رُؤَسَاءَ الْكَهَنَةِ بِكُلِّ مَا كَانَ.
12 فَاجْتَمَعُوا مَعَ الشُّيُوخِ، وَتَشَاوَرُوا، وَأَعْطَوُا الْعَسْكَرَ فِضَّةً كَثِيرَةً
13 قَائِلِينَ: «قُولُوا إِنَّ تَلاَمِيذَهُ أَتَوْا لَيْلًا وَسَرَقُوهُ وَنَحْنُ نِيَامٌ.
14 وَإِذَا سُمِعَ ذلِكَ عِنْدَ الْوَالِي فَنَحْنُ نَسْتَعْطِفُهُ، وَنَجْعَلُكُمْ مُطْمَئِنِّينَ».
15 فَأَخَذُوا الْفِضَّةَ وَفَعَلُوا كَمَا عَلَّمُوهُمْ، فَشَاعَ هذَا الْقَوْلُ عِنْدَ الْيَهُودِ إِلَى هذَا الْيَوْمِ.
16 وَأَمَّا الأَحَدَ عَشَرَ تِلْمِيذًا فَانْطَلَقُوا إِلَى الْجَلِيلِ إِلَى الْجَبَلِ، حَيْثُ أَمَرَهُمْ يَسُوعُ.
17 وَلَمَّا رَأَوْهُ سَجَدُوا لَهُ، وَلكِنَّ بَعْضَهُمْ شَكُّوا.
18 فَتَقَدَّمَ يَسُوعُ وَكَلَّمَهُمْ قَائِلًا: «دُفِعَ إِلَيَّ كُلُّ سُلْطَانٍ فِي السَّمَاءِ وَعَلَى الأَرْضِ،
19 فَاذْهَبُوا وَتَلْمِذُوا جَمِيعَ الأُمَمِ وَعَمِّدُوهُمْ بِاسْمِ الآب وَالابْنِ وَالرُّوحِ الْقُدُسِ.
20 وَعَلِّمُوهُمْ أَنْ يَحْفَظُوا جَمِيعَ مَا أَوْصَيْتُكُمْ بِهِ. وَهَا أَنَا مَعَكُمْ كُلَّ الأَيَّامِ إِلَى انْقِضَاءِ الدَّهْرِ». آمِينَ.
A question , what gave Mu’awiya the right to fight the legitimate Khalifa Ali which killed thousands of Muslims ? What gave Mu’awiya the right to rule the Muslims ? What right did he have ? What Sahaba chose him to rule over the Muslims ? What Shura ? You have to admit the fact that the status of Ali is so much higher than Mu’awiya ?
we know that. and muawiya didnt fight ali to be caliph but its only after ali was assasinated he was chosen to be caliph and hassan accepted that
Hasan ra gave him the right to rule over muslims and no doubt Ali ra status is higher than muaviya ra but it doesn't mean anyone can now insult him
And not only muaviya ra even Talha zubair ra also fought Ali because they demanded the killers of uthman ra
Did Mu’awiya have the right to fight Ali ? Did he have the right to prepare an Army to fight Hassan ? Did he have the right to pass leadership over to his Son ? And why didn’t Hussain give Baya to Muawaiya son ? The Sunni really need to ask questions as Ali , Hassan , Hussain and Fatima where highly highly regarded and loved by the Messenger
@@officialunifiedbullbreedre4035 first of all tell me if you're Sunni or Shia then we can answer your questions
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf why would this change your answer, the truth is the truth and cannot be changed , why are you asking this question ? How if it relevant ?
Abu Huraira narrated: The Prophet (S) looked toward ‘Ali, al-Hasan, al-Husayn, and Fatimah, and said: "I am in the state of war with those who will fight you, and in the state of peace with those who are peaceful to you.”
Sunni references:
(1) Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p699
(2) Sunan Ibn Majah, v1, p52
(3) Fada’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p767, Tradition #1350
(4) al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p149
(5) Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haythami, v9, p169
(6) al-Kabir, by Tabarani, v3, p30, also in al-Awsat
(7) Jamius Saghir, by al-Ibani, v2, p17
(8) Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v7, p137
(9) Sawai’q al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p221
(10) Talkhis, by al-Dhahabi, v3, p149
(11) Dhakha’ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p25
(12) Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tdadition #6145
(13) Others such as Ibn Habban, etc.
It is the well-known fact in the history that Muawiyah fought Imam ‘Ali (as). And based on the above tradition of the Prophet(S) the Prophet has declared war on Muawiyah. How can we still love a person whom the Prophet has declared war on him?
The Messenger of Allah said: "Whoever hurts ‘Ali, has hurt me"
May Allah be Pleased with the Companions of The Prophet P.B.U.H
they were tears of joy, not grief.
1. There are many other sahih ahadiths that prove this, especially regarding Mugheera ibn Shauba also cursing Hazrat Ali.
2. Muawiya did not give Hassan and Hussaain 'benefits'. That was the portion that ALLAH has ordained for the Prophet and the Ahle Bait.
3. Abdullah Bin Abdul Wahab, author of Seerat e Rasol, son of Abdul Wahab Najdi, also writes in this book that cursing happened for many years after the Ali's death. And that Muawiya had just made the murder of Uthman R.A an excuse. Becuase no one was bought to justice for that murder even in Muawiya's rule.
4. Muawiya exhibited great pleasure at Hassan's poisoning. As reported in Sahih ahadiths.
Lets not beat around the bush and bend over backwards to try and deny the truth, just because of our hatred of the rafadhis.
poisoning one again? give something better at least
@@aman-yd4dw It is unfortunate that you consider the ahadith and the muhadiseen people that spread poision. Go read Bukhari 2812 and Muslim 4776. Alhamdullilah my imaan does not let me accept any Sheikh's opinon when it directly conflicts with the words the my Prophet S.A.W.
Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.
Sahih Muslim 6229
Amir b. Sa'd b. Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya b. Abi Sufyan appointed Sa'd as the Governor and commanded: What prevents you from rebuking Abu Turab (Hadrat 'Ali), whereupon be said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said about him that I would not rebuke him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Aaron was unto Moses but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me. And I (also) heard him say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (the narrator) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Holy Prophet) said: Call 'Ali. He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: "Let us summon our children and your children." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family.
Sahih Muslim 6220
Muhammad ibn al-Muthanna informed us that he heard from Abu Bakr al-
Hanafi (Abdul Kabeer ibn Abdul Majeed) who heard from Bukayr ibn
Mismar who heard Aamir ibn Sa’d saying,
“Mu’awiya asked Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas, ‘What prevents you
from abusing Ali ibn Abi Talib?’ Sa’d replied, ‘I do not abuse
him as long as I remember three things that the messenger
of Allah (a.s.) said (about Ali). If I had one of them, it would
be better to me than red camels.
I do never abuse him whenever I remember that when the
Revelation came down and he (the Prophet) took Ali, his two
sons, and Fatima and let them come under his garment, and
then he said, ‘O Allah, these are my family and my
household.’
I do never abuse him whenever I remember that when he
(the Prophet) left him (Ali) behind in one of his battles and
Ali said, ‘Do you leave me with children and women?’ He
(the Prophet) said, ‘Are you not pleased to be to me as was
Aaron to Moses except that there shall be no prophethood
after me?’
And I do never abuse him whenever I remember the Day of
Khaybar when the messenger of Allah (a.s.) said, ‘I will give
this banner to a man who loves Allah and His messenger
(and whom Allah and His messenger love) and at whose
hands Allah will grant victory.’ We all looked forward to it,
but he (the Prophet) said, ‘Where is Ali?’ They said that he
had sore eyes. He asked to call him to come. When he (Ali)
came, he (the Prophet) spat in his eyes and gave him the
banner, and then Allah granted victory at his hands.’
*The narrator added, ‘By Allah, Mu’awiya did not mention him (Ali) with
any word until he left Medina.’” *
Sunan Nisai - Khasais e Ali Hadith 54
Go Read Musdarak lil Hakim - 6121
Its simple one of the conditions of the peace treaty between imam hassan and muwiyah was to stop.the cursing being done on the pulpits regarding his dad mola ali .
Ali rz sunni ki dil dil mi hai.
May allah curse the enemies of the sahab
:❤:ﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺ❤❤❤❤
how do you defend these two hadiths please give me an explanation:
1. Sahih Muslim 4776
2. Abu Dawud 4131
3. Sahih Muslim 6229
I do not know how can you miss @bro Hajji, I give you the benefit of the doubt in this matter otherwise someone like you who does research can easily find out that what is preached in the video is not true and I would be very interested in knowing the explanation of these hadiths please, thank you.
Sheikh said that muviyah called abu turab coz it was the dearest name for Ali. Yes it is right but muaviyah and bani umayyah didn't know that it was dearest to Ali coz in muslim 6229 a person from banu marwan orders a sahabi to curse abu turab. If someone orders to curse a man then why it would be through his best name abu turab. Think about it. Now take a look at abu turab means the fellow of soil and Ali means the fellow of high virtues. So why someone call a his enemy a s the fellow of high virtuea, they would call them the fellow of soil coz they don't know from whom and how Ali got this title. In muslim 6229, that sahabi is literally explaining to that man of banu marwan that how Ali got the title of abu turab. So when banu umayyah says abu turan, this means they are saying this to disrespect Ali coz they can't say 'curse ali' coz Ali means the fellow of high virtues. So in muslim 6220 muaviyah adresses Ali as abu turab, which means what it means. And still you have confusion, then go and read the explaination of muslim 6220 by ibn taiymiyah. He would definitely clear your confusions inshallah
The narrarion he mentioned goes against where were xompanions.
Treaty of hassan inckuded rhe condition of not cursing him.
They recieved gifts for reasons that allow recoeving gifts from zalim
2812 sahih muslim. What's your take on that shaikh
Brother can you make a video explaining why Muwaviya may Allah be pleased with him killed hujr Ibn Adi may Allah be pleased with him ?
How is Allah pleased with both the victim and the culprit?🤔
Because he was not cursing Ali Alaihisalam after being forced. And didn't accept the system of cursing.
If I had a dollar for every lie that seeped its way out of his mouth....
You'd have none. Go follow your own kufri sect.
@@a.conandoyle he'd have a decent balance.. cuz that guy actually makes up way too many lies! He even lied in a live debate on television.
Brother Haji can u also do videos in Urdu, there r a lot of shias in Pakistan
th-cam.com/video/LegeTAV4Ntw/w-d-xo.html
Moiz Ali Talpur whats your problem with shias !!
If the narrations Shaikh provided are true then that's enough of evidence ,,
Allahu A'lam
No he literally lied and tried to turnish the truth. Go read Sahih Bukhari Sahih Muslim Sunan Nisai Ibn Majah Musnad Ahmed. You will find truth.
This Man has completely messed up this topic! Almost All biased and illinterpreted
By your logic, if both were respecting each other and liking each other. Why fight each other? Bros were like 'it is business' ? Another thing i noticed in Arabs is that their fighting etiquette are diff, a bit civilised with respect and dignity.
5:47… there is a whole list oh sahih ahadith in Abu dawud on this topic. This gentleman is either ignorant or wilfully ignoring them.
Give me one sahih hadith which says that muaviya cursed Ali or ordered to curse Ali you will not find it in sha Allah
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf sahih Muslim 6220.. read ibn taymiyah’s commentary on it. Enjoy.
@@kyunbhai49 can u give me the arabic or the reference
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rf read mihaj us sunnah. Let me check Ali bhai’s video. He pasted the reference on screen.
Ali bhai ? That lunatic who is not a scholar and has no study under any shiekh. Does not know arabic ? Preach from his small room and run away when he has to face real scholar what an ignorant man ur following
Honestly we need to stop sugarcoating things. There is no way there was "love" between Ali and Mu'awiya. I like Othman Khamees but he does often say things which go beyond reasonably giving the benefit of the doubt or thinking the best of individuals. Of course we can reject that Mu'awiya cursed Ali, but to say there was love between them is far-fetched. They fought the first inter-Muslim battle between eachother where literally THOUSANDS of Muslims were killed. No way do you both just brush that off and have "love" for eachother. Also, Ali saying it was "Manafiyya" that caused Mu'awiya to kick the guy out of the sitting is not necessarily a sign of respect for Ali nor is it a sign of Ali acknowledging Mu'awiya respects him. It may just be in the same way Abu Baker's tribe protected him despite him being a Muslim based on his lineage. It is loyalty to their blood in front of outsiders who insult someone linked to them by blood; not love for eachother.
We need to stop sugarcoating it because then we become almost as deluded as the Rafidhis. We can love Ali and Mu'awiya without pretending they loved eachother
u are right
If there's someone you hate strictly, would you call him by his most beloved name?
@@Ismail-fv8dq there was no hatred as a muslim but lets be honest. Mu'awiyah and Ali went to war .. there were major tensions between them. Thats because Mu'awiyah refused to give to Bayah to Ali until he revenged the death of Uthman, which is a type of rebellion against Ali. But we should not doubt Mu'awiyahs Islam, and we leave his mistakes up to Allah.
@@sheriefelsayad5578 Ofcourse, I never said Muawiyah (ra) was in the right in terms of these wars. He was wrong for his decision, but some people need to understand that just because he fought Ali (ra), this doesnt necessarily mean that he had strict hatred towards Ali (ra), nor did Ali (ra) have strict hatred towards Muawiyah (ra). But as you said, we ask Allah to forgive him as there was a misunderstanding. At the end of the day, they both sacrificed greatly for Islam.
@@Ismail-fv8dq they called onto ali radi allahu anho by his beloved name thinking of it as a mockery... Not out of love for him
This was not any gift. Rather it was ' khamush ' which was decided from War booty by Allah swt.
Okey I understand, but If we know that , Ali ibn Abu talib was the beloved was Allah and his Prophet , and he was one of the 4 greatest Muslim so shouldn’t it the best go surrender and not engage in war , because Ali ibn Abu talib is not only sahaba but ahlul bait and one of the most loved one , I don’t know but don’t you think that’s is more pure to surrender or just give to Ali out of love of Rashool Allah instead of engaging in fight with the love of Rashool Allah PBUH
All the shia rafidi who claimed to be sunni here. Please praise our mother Ayesha RA before claiming you are sunni in the comment section 😂
Sheikh you know what ,Ali R.A used to pray qunoot nazila against Muawiyah and his supporters for what he did...Still you will say they loved each other...
Treaty of Hasan mentioned a point that Muawiyah will not appoint his son as his successor but unfortunately Muawiyah appointed his son Yazid as his successor just before his death...Will you still side with Muawiyah...The biggest irony is that you are not ready to call a spade a spade.. Truth alone triumphs.. Do whatever you guys want to do to prove Muawiyah right..
لعن الله معاوية وابنه، واللهم احشر معهم من والاهم.
muslim 6220 and 6229 you will find answer , and next time pls don't hide things that are written just because of audience (wallah im not shia)
It is unfortunate to see that even knowledgeable people today are doing tawil of these things... Even ibn taymiyyah wrote that muawiyah orderd saad to sabb Ali and this is clear in context and wording. First of the word امر that is muawiyah ra commanded him and second by saad saying i will never do it.
Moreever the wording of in Sunan ibn Majah is also further supports the clear context and theme.
حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ سَابِطٍ، - وَهُوَ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ - عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ، قَالَ قَدِمَ مُعَاوِيَةُ فِي بَعْضِ حَجَّاتِهِ فَدَخَلَ عَلَيْهِ سَعْدٌ فَذَكَرُوا عَلِيًّا فَنَالَ مِنْهُ فَغَضِبَ سَعْدٌ وَقَالَ تَقُولُ هَذَا لِرَجُلٍ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ يَقُولُ مَنْ كُنْتُ مَوْلاَهُ فَعَلِيٌّ مَوْلاَهُ " . وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ " أَنْتَ مِنِّي بِمَنْزِلَةِ هَارُونَ مِنْ مُوسَى إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ لاَ نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي " . وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ " لأُعْطِيَنَّ الرَّايَةَ الْيَوْمَ رَجُلاً يُحِبُّ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ " ."
It was narrated that Sa`d bin Waqqas said:
"Mu`awiyah came on one of his pilgrimages and Sa`d entered upon him. They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry and said: 'Are you saying this of a man of whom I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: "If I am a person's close friend, `Ali is also his close friend." And I heard him say: "You are to me like Harun was to Musa, except that there will be no Prophet after me." And I heard him say: "I will give the banner today to a man who loves Allah and His Messenger."
Sahih (Darussalam)
English : Vol. 1, Book 1, Hadith 121
Arabic : Book 1, Hadith 126
Sunan Ibn Majah.
Also people cursing Ali ra is clearly mentioned with the word of curse in the wording of sahi Muslim from the people of aali marwan and also the narration mentioned in abu dawud about fulan speaking bad of ali and syed bin zaid rebuking that person, it is mentioned by name in sunan al kubra that the person was mugheerah bin shubah who commanded to curse ali. and muawiyah ra was present.
Bro hajji, we see well researched videos from you but on this one you seem to not well researched here. I hope you will dedicate a complete lecture on this if you feel i have misinterpreted my sources here... Or you will consider that defending something by hiding facts will make us look bad in the eyes of neutral people.
Of course there are ways to defend companions from the rafidah fools by being objective.
Saying people use abu turan as good gesture always id ignorance of the hadith in sahi muslim where it is mentioned that a man asked to curse abu turab.
Bruh you used the Ibn Majah which includes Abdur Rahman ibn Sabit who is known for irsal. Yahya ibn Maeen said Ibn Sabit never heard this from Saad ibn Abi Waqqas RA
Not to mention you referenced darussalams grading on this. You do know darussalam is a publishing house and not a author, narrator or scholar. That's kind of hilarious
Wow very nice nasbi keep giving such false excuses. May Allah Azzawajal do judge you in the day of Judgement. Munqarin of Hadith. Deviants.
May Allah preserve Shaikh Uthman. He explained it so beautifully so that every doubt of your heart fades away by the permission of Allah.
U don't need to take over what a scholar explains. Sheikhs explain the events based on their madhab. Make ur research and read the history from all resources without prejeduce.
@@MohamedSaid-ob3ug that’s exactly what I did, and Alhamdulillah I’m salafi because of that journey
@@Unknown_.01 How can u search the history and your religion if u belong to a madhab, in this case salafi. If u r salafi then u r chained to the salafi books. If u don't then u r not salafi. So you r contradicting ur self.
I recommend u to not relate to anyone except Allah and his Koran. If a scholar says alligns to the Koran is OK. If its not just throw it even he is the biggest salafi shaikh. Beleive Allah and ur brain.
@@MohamedSaid-ob3ug 😂😂😂😂😂
So you’re hadith rejector?? One of the dumbest of sects lol no offence
I researched for years, and then became salafi upon finding they’re clearly upon the correct understanding of Quran. Alhamdulillah
@@Unknown_.01 hel no. Salafi is the most wrong hatefull sect in the Islam.
I m not rejector of Hadith. I take only what alligns with the Koran.
I used to be salafi like u but found out that most of their books are written under the watch of the rullers (ummayad and abbasid) back then. Those rullers were way far from hoest and held down any other group and commited horrible massacres like killing Hussain and destroying kaba, raping and killing ahla al Medina and fighting against Imam Ali, killing most of the sahaba ...etc. Salafi adore those criminals, love and take over the books tlhat are written under their surveillance.
Please continue ur search. Allah might guid u to the right path
This scholar will also come up with explanations in praise of Yazeed bin Muawiya (lanatullah) and justify the killing of Prophet Muhammad (saww)'s family at Karbala
Justice uthman's killer was a guise as said by some historians.
حضرت علی رضی اللہ عنہ ھر سنی کے دل میں ہے ، اور علی افضل ہیں۔
Shaykh Uthman❤
Ok now I want answer for Sahih bukhari hadith 2812 (Ammar ibn e Yasir RA)
So you accept sahih Bukhari ?! You must accept this then don’t you ☺️
Ali at Omar’s deathbed, invoked Allah's Mercy for `Umar and said, "O `Umar! You have not left behind you a person whose deeds I like to imitate and meet Allah with more than I like your deeds.
Sahih Bukari 3686, Book 62, Hadith 35
Sahih Muslim 2389a, Book 44 Hadith 18
@@Lessgoo531 subhanallah brother you got the wrong gist of me I'm from ahlus sunnah wal jamaa as well and I love khulafa e rashideen offcourse you didn't even bothered to read what 2812 hadith really is about did you now??
@@moizkhan8421 it's the one of the main problem this misguided people think everyone talking in favor of Ahlul Bait is a Rafidhi. When replied they don't come back .
@@Lessgoo531 What a fool you are making yourself?
"May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."
Tell us, is it a lie that the party that will kill Ammar is calling to hellfire? And who was the leader of that rebellious aggressive party I wonder. Don't fall for wahhabi salafi lies. You don't have to be a rafidi to acknowledge the misdeeds of Umayads
is this sheick speaking in Fusha arabic of khaliji dialect ?
Fusha
Khalid said:
Al-Miqdam ibn Ma'dikarib and a man of Banu Asad from the people of Qinnisrin went to Mu'awiyah ibn AbuSufyan.
Mu'awiyah said to al-Miqdam: Do you know that al-Hasan ibn Ali has died? Al-Miqdam recited the Qur'anic verse "We belong to Allah and to Him we shall return."
A man asked him: Do you think it a calamity? He replied: Why should I not consider it a calamity when it is a fact that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to take him on his lap, saying: This belongs to me and Husayn belongs to Ali?
The man of Banu Asad said: (He was) a live coal which Allah has extinguished. Al-Miqdam said: Today I shall continue to make you angry and make you hear what you dislike. He then said: Mu'awiyah, if I speak the truth, declare me true, and if I tell a lie, declare me false.
He said: Do so. He said: I adjure you by Allah, did you hear the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) forbidding use to wear gold?
He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of silk?
He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of the skins of beasts of prey and riding on them?
He said: Yes. He said: I swear by Allah, I saw all this in your house, O Mu'awiyah.
Mu'awiyah said: I know that I cannot be saved from you, O Miqdam.
Khalid said: Mu'awiyah then ordered to give him what he did not order to give to his two companions, and gave a stipend of two hundred (dirhams) to his son. Al-Miqdam then divided it among his companions, and the man of Banu Asad did not give anything to anyone from the property he received. When Mu'awiyah was informed about it, he said: Al-Miqdam is a generous man; he has an open hand (for generosity). The man of Banu Asad withholds his things in a good manner.
Sunan Abu Dawood
4131 hadith
There is nothing to learn here. Please brothers and sisters, this is a point. Muwaiyah FOUGHT against his Khalifa of the time. He was in clear error. He FOUGHT against Ali which was way worse than CURSING Ali. There are many other hadith that claim that he insulted Imam Ali:
Sunan Ibn Majah 121: “They mentioned `Ali, and Mu`awiyah criticized him. Sa`d became angry”
Sunan an-Nasa'i 3006: “They are afraid of Muawiyah.'… They are forsaking the Sunnah out of hatred for Ali.'"
Sahi Al Bukhari 3703 Sahi Al Muslim 6229 ..
Mashallah I used to be confused by the stories I heard of muawiyah cursing and usurping Ali Ra this is your great gift for me this Ramadan this understanding subhanallah
Bro muawiya broke the peace treaty that was set by imam Hassan ra which was to elect the next caliph but instead muawiya appointed his son yazid to become caliph is this not enough to show muawiyah had W one motives want makes u think he is innocent from curing imam Ali ra. And because of him appointing his son yazid to be become the rule many other ahlul bayt and sahaba were killed the blood is on both of their hands
@@Sh4h01 I don’t have knowledge but I feel like appointing his son was incorrect and Ali had the rightful claim to the calipha
@@Itsbuckjames this i s right. Muawia has appointed his son as next khalifat and therefor the treaty with Hassan was broken. This has initiated the war which led the killing of Hussain R.A. an his family. Beside that Yazid's army invated mecca and bombed the ka'ba with manjaniiq and invated Medina and killed a lot of sahaba and tabiiin and raped women 2-3 days under permission of Yazid. This was shocking to me but if I look back the history of Sufyan family I can only conclude that this family hated ahlu albayt and wanted to take revench of Badr battle.
@@Sh4h01 i consider you evil of the evil. Because you curse and speak evil of the Sahabah. May Allah deal with you. Ameen.
You don't blame Ali(Ra) for coming to power by the help of rebels who killed uthman(Ra). Similarly muwaiyah (Ra) thought it's best that sahaba don't fight amongst themselves for rulership and he only appointed yazid with good intentions for the sake of Muslim unity and defeating Romans (as yazid had previously attacked Istanbul before and his dream was to defeat roman empire too but of course things didn't work out well). It's very easy to blame Ali, muwaiyah or even yazeed for the 2 fitnas but there's not much they could do really. Even Ali (Ra) didn't punish killers of uthman (Ra) who were in his army , that doesn't mean he is evil, people just don't know the circumstances and blame everything on rulers who had good intentions of stability and suppressing rebellions.
If Hazrat Muhaviya And Hazrat Ali were enemies then why son of Hazrat Ali Hassan ra sign agreement of peace with Muhaviya ra ?. No they were not enemies they were brothers.
He signed a peace agreement on the suggestion muawiya (ra) but with some conditions? Try learning about those conditions and breaking of those conditions led to karbala my friend
Because if hassan did not Muawiyah would have killed him
May Allah reward shaykh Khamees with good. He made an effective argument in defense of Muawiyah (rah). Nonetheless, his effort adds to the compounded evidence that the Qudaa in alliance with Muawiyah, especially Banu Kalb, were the chief propagators of cursing Ali (rah). Khamees' shows that cursing was circulating around Shaam, and Qudaa were the chief benefactors of turning Sahaba (rahm) against each other, weakening them.
The departure of the Muslim Ummah, tye Prophet's (saws) Ummah, away from his Sunnah and the righteous caliphates (rahm), to become monarchies, were the machinations of Romanized Christian Arab tribes who newly converted, or remained Christian, but used Muawiyah for their ascendancy to power and authority over tye Muslim Ummah. These tribes manipulated Muawiyah.
Sh. Khamees presents only one explanation for Muawiyah opposing allegiance to Ali (rah), but he ignores whst Amr ibn al As said and did at the mediation, and what happened to Ammar ibn Yasir (rah). And behind Amr deviation was Abu Sufyan's longstanding ties to Qudaa and Kalb. Abu Sufyan even owned land in Qudaa territory and Kalbites lived in a village on his land. According to Tabari, Abu Sufyan maintaining his highly acute drive for tribal leadership, and after Abu Bakr (rah) cut stipends to him, he pushed his son to go to Shaam and develop relations there. Because we know Muawiyah was a pauper in al Madinah but rich beyond his imaginatin in Shaam. At his death, he was tge biggest landowner of al Madinah and had built a Romanized palace on southwest shore of Galilee
Simple question to this person - sahih muslim 6229. What action did Muawiya take against Marwan the cursed ? This lack of action speaks louder than words.
It was someone from descendants of Marwan. Not Marwan himself. Don't lie on Hadith. You cursed one.😂
@@rougue-gamer Sahih muslim 6220 for you and your laanati family. May you be raised with Yazeed 😂
@@kyunbhai49you have a dirty mind my boy
What prevents you from abusing Abu turab doesn't imply that muaviya cursed Ali
Stop twisting the hadith
@@AbdulRahman-ci9rfastagfirullah
Brother you're everywhere defending nothing but Shames and curses,you seem nasbi to me,but I'll think best of you,I'll consider you as a lover of ahl e bait
May Allah guide us
Defend Sunan Abu Dawood,4131
@@kyunbhai49 My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides.
Also recite this dua:
اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ
“O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.”
I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded:
The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous.
The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility:
(16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]."
The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
If we admit that Muawiya cursed Ali than this assaults Hassan and Hussein, is not a proper methodological approach. Truth doesn’t care who it might offend anyway. First investigate the manner in and of itself. Did it happen or not? Then investigate the Hassan and Hussein issue separately.
Gow does it assault imam Hassan and Imam Hussain?
@@tenybhai That’s what they say. I’m explaining how it’s a flawed line of reasoning
Daesh was inspired by Muawwiyah and his son Yazid. Daesh did nothing but getting by inspired by what Muawwiyah and his son were doing...
Sheikh most part is completely illogical once one removes the argument which you haven't provided any reference for
All these hadith are sahih. For once get up your lazy arse and search for them. You want everything handed to you on silver plate.
Of course he did. Read your sunni books of ahadeeth.
Explain - when was this revenge for usman blood was taken because of which a man went ahead and fought with the khilifa of Muslims in the spam of 19 + 3.5 years of rule/A hadees says killing any one who stood against Khilafa/You have to justify ether explain when was the revenge taken or was it an excuse to raise mutiny against Ali. I am suspiciouos. The court of Humanity is suspicious./ His men were doing their job/ does a thief say that he has made a theft/You are lier to say that hasan and husai used to get benefit from cursed muawiya but it was what decided by Allaha in quran/it raises a question that either you have not read Quran or you are a Yahoodi who work against islam/muawiya was on the alm of son of ali/if you had read sulhe hasan where muawiya begged and his generation survived on the alm of son of ali/You are a yahoodi- son of a pig/This time you have spoken the truth that sahaba did not abuse each other which proves that muawiya was not a companion/muaviya target was not achived so he went on and continuted/have you read the hadees of mikhdaam who prooved the character protryed by cursed muaviya./most of the companions pleaged their alligience with this world/why no ond did because he used to kill muslims/you yahoodi such a big lier/i am not going to waste my time with satan. La haula wala quwwata ..........
"I swear by Allah in whose hand my life is that I am a Sunni Muslim who follows Qur'an and Sunnah and Salaf and I am not a Shia, and I don't do any shirk with Allah."
Narrated Ibn Abbas(R):
I was playing with children and Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya(bin Abu Sufiyan). I returned and said: He is busy in eating food. He(ﷺ) again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in eating food, whereupon he(ﷺ) said: May Allah never fill his stomach!
---[Sahih Al-Muslim 6628]
Zirr reported:
"Ali bin Abi Talib(R) said: (I swear)By Him Who split up the seed and created something living, the Prophet (ﷺ) gave me a promise that no one but a believer would love me, and none but a hypocrite would nurse grudge against me. "
---[Sahih Al-Muslim 78]
Amir ibn Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan ordered Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas(R) and said:
Why are you not abusing Abu Turab (i.e Ali Ibn Abi Talib(R)), whereupon he said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said about him that I would not abuse him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. (1) I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali(R) said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Harun was unto Musa but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me.(2) And I (also) heard him(Prophet (S)) say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (Sa'd) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Prophet(S)) said: Call 'Ali(R). He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (3)(The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: "Let us summon our children and your children." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family.
----[Sahih Al-Muslim 2404d]
Narrated Zaid bin Arqam(R):
from the Prophet (ﷺ): For whomever I am his Mawla then 'Ali is his Mawla.
---[Sunan At-Tirmidi 3713]
Abu Yahya (Imam Tirmidhi) said this(hadith) is Hasan Saheeh Gareeb (Authentic)
Shaikh Albani classified it as Saheeh (Authentic)
--- "Here Mawla means leader"
Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar ibn Yasir(R) used to carry two at a time. The Prophet(S) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah(and Paradise in other narration) and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire. ---[Sahih Al Bukhari 2812]
During the battle of Siffin Ammar ibn Yasir was one of the commanders in the army of Ali ibn Abi Talib(A) and he was killed by man from the army of Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufiyan.
Narrated `Ikrima bin Khalid:
Ibn `Umar(R) said, "I went to Hafsa(wife of Prophet (S) and sister of Ibn Umar) while water was dribbling from her twined braids. I said, 'The condition of the people is as you see, and no authority has been given to me.' Hafsa said, (to me), 'Go to them, and as they (i.e. the people) are waiting for you, and I am afraid your absence from them will produce division amongst them.' " So Hafsa(R) did not leave Ibn `Umar(R) till we went to them. When the people differed. Muawiya addressed the people saying, "'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we(i.e Muawiya and his son Yazeed) are more rightful to be a Caliph than he(i.e Abdullah Ibn Umar(R)) and his father((Umar ibn Al Khattab (R))." On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), "Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)?" `Abdullah bin `Umar(R) said, "I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father(Abu Sufiyan) for the sake of Islam(i.e Ali(R)), is more rightful to be a Caliph(than you and your son),' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life)." Habib said, "You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so).
---- Sahih Al-Bukhari 4108
This incident took place after the death of Hasan ibn Ali(R) , when Muawiya broke Hasan-Muawiya treaty and appointed his son Yazeed ibn Muawiya as his successor in caliphate after him.
You follow EMAM?
Than you are true ahli sunnah
Who not inflict by nashibi influence...
Look...
How they deny the siffin war, which clearly state that the tyrant is LEADER to invite people to hell!!!
And how they twisted the meaning
For "not fulfilled the tyrant belly"
As praised to the tyrant
Cursing event to sayidina Ali was mutawatir!!!
Not just sahih
And still the speaker deceived the common umah...
He who deny the crime of somebody
He will burden the same crime as he defend
Proved from the Quran him self QS 2:91
@@Faizayul Yes I like his videos may Allah bless him and guide others through him.
I am from India, my family is Barelvi . I read Qur'an Translation in 2015 cover to cover, I was 17 years old back then . Then my Aqeedah got cleared . After that I studied the books of Sunan and asked Allah for guidance very much (even till this day Alhumdulillah) and I started Rafulyadain, and Praying like Prophet (S). My journey was long. I gave dawah to my family members some of them teased me that I became a wahabi, but some of them came to Qur'an and Sunnah Alhumdulillah.
@@kamranabbasi6757 Alhamdulillah, These Nasbis Wont Be Able To Hide The Truth
@@abdullah_kurd what do you think by socially and economically boycotting Nasbis not making family relationships with them totally isolating them from Ummah. I think it's very effective way to teach them for challenging the truth however I am curious about how other brothers think about it.
Iman Ali (AS) was cursed by muawiya (ra)
as well as by his governers
There are hadith in muslim 6229 and 6220,
6220 hadith has the word تَسُبَّ and many nasbi's says they didn't curse iman Ali exactly, only ordered to criticize him,so I ask them is critisizing imam Ali a good deed? How much reward did it earn them?
Mola Ali recited qunoot e nazla on muawiya ibn abu sufyaan ( ibn aby shaybah hadith 7123)
During Muawiya ibn abu sufiyan's reign, the biddah of khutba of Eid before eid namaz was introduced,inorder to curse mola Ali because initially people would leave directly after namaz without listening to khutbah as it was just a cursing session
Ammar bin yassir (ra) was martyred in the battle of siffin and there's hadith regarding it in bukhari 2812,may be the matter was ambiguous before it but after the killing of ammar,it was clear,Ali was on haq
There are many more hadith which make it clear mu'awiyah was on wrong side and he did wrong with mola Ali,
And Imam hassan (AS) agreed for the peace treaty on the request of mu'awiyah (ra), however few conditions were made,and all of those were broken by mu'awiyah,starting by nominating his son yazeed as khalifa and we all know what yazeed did,be it karbala or battle of Al-harra,I don't need to curse yazeed, because Allah has cursed his existence till Qayamah
I won't curse mu'awiyah like shia's because I'm the real shia of Ali (AS),The biddah of cursing sahaba was started by banu ummaya,Mola Ali never did it neither he ordered anyone,he even behaved with kindness with khawarij and everyone
Let's not forget,whosoever stayed silent during battles, were killed by banu ummaya example Abdullah ibn umar and he regretted it on his death bed
In short,do your own research instead of blidnly listening to scholars and moreover, I'm not asking you to curse any sahaba but we need to learn our history,we need to learn from where did monarchy start, we're one ummah,we need to learn everything,not justify the mistakes of sahaba because they're not masoom, only prophet (AS) or other ambiya are masoom,no one else,so they too are humans
We'll keep our attitude like Mola Ali, just be aware, be aware of the wrong doings but never curse them
We cannot forget these things, Even Qura'an talks about brothers of yousuf (AS),how they wronged him,however they were forgiven but still we read about their actions in Qura'an from 1400 years,same is the case here
Tale of rafizi ppl with no knowledge. This is a real scholar
My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides.
Also recite this dua:
اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ
“O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.”
I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded:
The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous.
The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility:
(16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]."
The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
Hence, why I disagree with the Twelver doctrine. I am a Muslim just as Allah named us.
(22.78). I recommend you check out the Shia reformist channel Al Islaah. Their ethos is Quran centricity and hadith that have 'authentic' grading but that which are in line with the Quran. And so they demonstrate major issues with the mainstream Twelver beliefs and practises, which are derived from the ghulat that got popular and mainstream. FYl, the ghulat are extremists whom the Shia Imams were against) themselves.
Although I am not a shii, I do agree with much of what they say because it's what the Quran says. Where I differ with them is over 'authentic' hadith, especially when they admit that not only were the ghulat fabricating hadith, but that they were fabricating the isnaads (chains of narrators) also, to give the hadith its authenticity look. You should take a more hardline stance over the shii hadith corpus because I doubt its authenticity, and I am afraid to adopt the transmission of man who are susceptible to the whispers of devils.
Allah says this is shirk in 6.121. So, since there's no divine approval for any of the hadith corpus' out there, I stick to the Quran for my guidance and the living tradition for my practise, the latter of which I acknowledge most likely didn't reach us unadulterated. So, I rely on Allah's Mercy for any shortcomings, considering I've come 1400 years after the Prophet.
The authority is the Quran. It is the "best hadith" (39.23) and the most truthful hadith (4:87), that guides to the straightest way (17.9).
@@samikhann you're joke😂
What a splendid video. Thorn in the sides of the shias
A group who is fire of hell will kill Amar ibn yasir sahih Hadees....only munafiq will praise Mahwiya
@@pathan6135 it doesn’t say fire of hell you idiot. It says a rebellious group.
@@CordobaGeneral1234 hat Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire
Read full hadith oh Munafiq...
@@pathan6135 Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported that the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) said:
A group would secede itself (from the Ummah) when there would be dissension among the Muslims. *_Out of the two groups who would be nearer the truth_* would kill them.
Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!
What a hypocrite liar. Always fabricate and force his ideologies even with evidences are there
What a lie...🙉
What are the terms of pace treaty between Imam Hassan and Muawia? First, read it...
After can discuss if Muawia courses Imam Ali or not.
Ibn taimiya commenting on the same exact hadith said that muawiyah did indeed order Sa'd to curse imam Ali!
No, He didn't.
@@user-dl5ln3wd6f yes he did.. check your own books 🤦🏻♂️
@@tenybhaino, He didn't. He was just quoting what the rafidi said.
@@user-dl5ln3wd6f no he was not.. check this if you read arabic
مختصر منهاج السنة، لابن تيمية، تأليف الشيخ عبد الله الغنيمان: ج1، ص377.
واما حديث سعد لما أمره معاوية بالسب فأبى، فقال: ما منعك أن تسب علي بن ابي طالب؟ فقال: ثلاث قالهن رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وسلم) فلن أسبه، لأن يكون لي واحدة منهن أحب إليّ من حمر النعم.....
@@tenybhai it's useless to even show them for most of them social and economical boycott is solution.
Explanation is full of biasness and supports the neem nasbi people hidden among the sunnis.
Mulla Ali Qari(ra) wrote in his sarah about Muwabiya(ra) that je was a baagi and he did it for Khilafah and qisas e uthman(as) was just a secondary issue
Can somebody find an explanation to this problematic incident between these two great Sahabah RadhiAllahhuanhuma - found it on a Shia website but even Sunnis (e.g. Engineer Mohammed Ali Mirza - see his TH-cam videos for his opinion on the subject) who call themselves "Hussaynis" (& regard those who do not criticise Yazeed & talk highly of him as well as those who do not rebuke Muawiyah for his (so called) "rebellion" against Ali as "Yazeedis") say the incident (as follows) proves Ali hated Muawiya for his battles against Ali (May Allah be pleased with them all):
Shaykh Muqbil al-Wadi'i, may Allah be merciful to him, said in the footnote: As for la'n, we did not find any evidence of that in the reliable books of Sunnah, despite a long search. However, as for "praying against", it has been soundly reported from him (i.e. 'Ali), may Allah be pleased with him: Ibn Abi Shaybah (2/137) said: Hushaym - Husayn - 'Abd al-Rahman b. Ma'qil: "I performed the early morning prayer with 'Ali, and he did qunut, and he said in his qunut: 'O Allah, punish Mu'awiyah and his followers, and 'Amr b. al-'As and his followers, and Abu al-A'war al-Salmi and his followers, and 'Abd Allah b. Qays and his followers.'" Al-Bayhaqi (2/204) said, after recording part of it: "Sahih, well-known." And it is as he said in terms of authenticity, for it is upon the standard of the two Shaykhs.
Now, there is a secret in this du'a of Imam 'Ali (peace be upon him) against Mu'awiyah and his followers. The supplication-against in the qunut is made against infidels only, and never against Muslims. This was the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family)...
Engineer Mirza is also a Rafdhi khabees. He is just pretending to be a Sunni to create doubts in the minds of common Sunni masses. Beware brother.
Regarding your question, ask any good scholar who is well versed in these issues.
@@muhammadhaazim Personally I don't think he is Raafidhi Khabees but he is IMO extreme on trying to prove the worthlessness & evil of Muawiah RadhiAllahhuanhu, which is something Ahle Sunnat don't do. But Yazeed was a misguided leader & didn't deserve to be Ameer ul Mohmineen. Muawiah made yet another mistake by passing him the rule of Khilafah. After all look what happened in his time: Imaam Hussain Shahaadat, The incident of Al-harra in Medina etc.
@@mkhan9764 Brother no Sunni have those deviant beliefs like Engineer Mirza has. Only Shia endorses and supports him. Regarding Yazeed, nobody is supporting him here. But Regarding Hazrat Muaviyah (RA), he is a Sahabi Nabi (SAW) and Ahle Sunnah will never ever tolerate anything against him. What happened between the Sahabas ( RA) who the hell are we to judge them or slander against them. Regarding whom Allah's Quran testifies that Allah is pleased with them.
So Brother leave what doesn't concern you and listen real scholars to clear your doubts.
@@muhammadhaazim He is a lover of all the Sahabah except Muaviah RadhiAllahhuanhu TBF & that is because Muaviah fought Ali RadhiAllahhuanhu (which many Sunnis believe he was wrong for) & because he appointed Yazeed as his successor (which many Sunnis believe he was wrong for), who set up an environment in which Hussain RadhiAllahhuanhu was martyred, Madina was attacked etc. I do believe it's better not to dig up Muaviah's faults but it is OK to condemn Yazeeds Khilafah.
@@muhammadhaazim
I give 2 people
Great ulama ahli sunnah
th-cam.com/video/NYvBqiaLzVU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7lzeNrweut0/w-d-xo.html
Dr Adnan ibrahim
th-cam.com/video/H44MTBwqadc/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/S0pP-1cjtdk/w-d-xo.html
Syeh hasan ibn farhan al maliky
I feel like their is a trend of watering down the differences between the Sahaba which existed historically . They change the dynamics so their idea of them is higher but at the cost of historical truth. They went to War but then cursing seems out of character ? The prophet did say Ali will always be upon the truth and the only Hadith I can think of with muawiya is praying he never gets full after ignoring the prophets request. Sure some people say the prophet said something similar to a little girl but did that girl ignore the prophet or say she had something better to do ? The same thing happens between Fatima and umar. Isn’t changing the story so your belief is easier to digest haram ?
Historical truth which shias subjectively change to also fulfill their agendas and aqeedah. You go the opposite and inflate the ahlul bayt with so much ghuluw and then get riled up when war or hostility against them is mentioned. This is what shias dont get, the ahlul bayt were great people, they were people of great respect, but they were just people at the end of the day, just like the other sahaba. They werent immortal, nir could they conjure dragons or lions, nor do they have ability to predict the future or other supernatural ability. There is nothing historically in sunni, early shia or external orientalist sources that talk about them in that way. The historical version of the ahlul bayt were very different to the modern neo savafid shia version of who they were. When you realise the sunni islam draws its rulings and hadith more from history and treats or major islamic figures as human beings then you can understand the concept as to why they would fight with each other yet could also respect each other, they could make mistakes, they were human and they werent infallible
Side note, shias also cursed Hasan Ra when he gave up the Khalifa to Muawiya, how are you going to digest that haram?
@@DaSauseHouse no offense buddy but saying "I'm from a sunni household..." is the fakest comment ever. If you're from a sunni household then I'm the Mehdi bruv. Also calling calling shias rafida and referring to then as friends? Which one is it? You.re like a 45 year old undercover cop at a festival trying his hardest to blend in and trying to be cool and not caught out. If you are a shia just say so, dont pull this taqiyyah crap. Also when hazrat Hasan abdicated the caliphate to Muawiya Ra, the contemporary shia made lanat upon him for being a coward and damaging the shia sect. Shiasm = political sect. At the point of saqeefah and early shia literature we worshipped the same. Then came the random stories and hadiths, the turbah, selective interpretation of ghadir, of karbala, of fadak, the institutionalised cursing of the Rashidun (which persists to this day), the fire walking, the mud crawling, the combining of persian majoosi customs into islam (nowruz), the salaat of people (salatul jafar/fatima) etc... none of these things, by the way, was done by our Nabi al mustafa SAW. Save your breath before trying to refute obscure or daeef hadiths from sunni sources. If you have an issue then it should be from the 4 madhabs as that is the pervading ulema of sunni thought. Dont quote some nasibi rubbish and try and make it sunni
@@DaSauseHouse also you said they curse the 5th caliph openly, the 5th caliph is hazrat Hasan you knob head
@@friedeggswithbeef Assalamu Alikum brother. You seem knowledgeable. Can you answer this question I have and doubt in my mind?
"You know I am skeptical about Muawiya (RA). Their are still doubts in my mind. Sheikh in the video said, how can Muawiya (RA) curse Ali (RA) when he called him Abu Turab which was one of his beloved titles. See, now I have seen this hadith, and after reading, it seems some people didn't know that Abu Turab was a title that Ali (RA) loved and embraced and so they used it to curse him. So is it possible that Muawiya (RA) also didn't know about it? Brothers help me rawafid put this doubt in my mind."
sunnah.com/muslim/44/59
Muwabiya(ra) use to cry??
This is a big lie and fabricated one
The narration says صب which means to criticize not curse???
So criticising imam Ali is a good thing to do?
@@user-fo8yv4qm9t I agree it’s not right to criticize the Amir Al momineen. I dunno the context , I do know he criticized Ali as for not apprehending the killers of Uthman… who were in his army ( the khawarij) ..The khawarij assassinated Ali too…
@@chirazzk8095 no it was criticism in general,it is literally in muslim 6220
Go and read it
And plz answer me were killers of usman (ra) killed by mu'awiyah bin Abu sufiyan?
One of the reasons of assassination of Usman e ghani (ra) is Marwan,he was the governor of mu'awiyah (ra)
Even mola Ali never forgave mu'awiyah,recited qunoot e nazila on him ( ibn abi shaybah,7123) and in other hadith of ibn abi shaybah,he said,"there will be verdict in the court of Allah on the judgement day between me and mu'awiyah" (I paraphrased it)
Mola Ali was cursed ( nauzubillah) even during the khutbah of Eid, this is the reason why biddah of Eid khutba before Eid namaz was started in mu'awiyah 's reign
Read muslim,6229
Bukhari 2812
Prophet literally cursed mu'awiyah Sahih Muslim, Book 45, Hadith 125
Did it come out to be true? Yes
And it's reported in al-bidayah,that he used to eat 7 times a day and his still said,"by God,my belly is not full,but I'm tired" and due to his huge belly started the to give khutbah while sitting down,he was the one who started this biddah too
Read hadith of ghadeer e khum,then you'll get to know loving and defending ahl e bait is the part of your imaan
And we cannot provide the certificate to muawiya,if mola Ali never forgave him,because the ambiguity of the matter was cleared after the martyrdom of Ammar ibn Yasir(ra),a 90 year old sahaba who fought for imam Ali (AS),bukhari 2812
Therefore it's clear that imam Ali was on haqq
@@chirazzk8095 If you criticize rulers then you are a Khwariji in Salafi Madhab, so Muawiah was a khuwarij?
@@ErtugralGhazi-mm7ti where does it say … you cannot criticize rulers… don’t make stuff up 😂😂😂….
LOL do you people actually believe this rubbish? He fought against imam Ali as and didn’t pledge allegiance to him, but use to defend him? What are you people talking about. You are the reason people mock Islam.
Mashallah he didn’t curse Imam Ali (As) but he only raised a sword against him (your fourth khalifa right) and with it killed many early Muslims. Your manhaj says shia are bad for cursing sahaba but killing Sahaba is fine, and almost virtuous.
Alhamdulillah, Allah ﷻ keep me holding onto the true thaqalayn ya rabb
Actually no none of our Ahlus Sunnah scholar did this until recent times. One of our Muhaditheen was matyred for speaking truth his name is Nisai Rahimaullah. These people have nothing to do with Ahlus Sunnah Manhaj they are decievers and calling curse of Allah Azzawajal upon themselves no matter how much they dress like scholar they will never be guided unless they accept the truth.
As a Sunni Muslim Muwahid☝he really should demonstrate the love for Mu'awiya by debating his nemesis Sh. Yasser Al Habib.
Whilst the job of a good lawyer is to defend the position of his client and seek to defend him from all charges, what we have seen here is a scenario of a lawyer defending the indefensible
Why would Mu’awiya want to know why Sa’d did not insult Ali?
Was this a normal practice for the Muslims of the time? If so who used to curse Ali (as)?
What a silly nonsensical statement to make , coupled with a straw-man too , sheik uthman didn’t say no one cursed ali , in fact he did say in the video that it was indeed narrated that people did curse and insult ali , people attacked ali even in the council of muawiyah may allah be pleased with them both, the point was muawiyah never insulted ali , And never allowed ali to be insulted in his presence or council and kicked these people out, not that ali was never insulted by people, maybe actually pay attention to the point being made before attempting a silly response , muawiyah didn’t insult ali, it was never narrated that he did and it doesn’t make sense whatsoever
Some hypocrites and people who were angered by the murder of Uthman didn't like Ali because of his stance of not taking quick action. While Muawiya also disagreed with Ali on this matter, some people took it far. That doesn't make him, Muawiya, one of the people who insulted Ali just because of a disagreement
@@abbysheyba8421 Muawiya's demand of uthmans blood was a trick to fight imam ali, what do u think he's going to tell the people of sham to fight the rightful khalif because i want to rule instead...
If u understand arabic go to sahih sunan ibn majah, authored by al-albani, in volume 1,page 58,hadith number 120.
@@abbysheyba8421 muawiya fought imam Ali based on the excuse of demanding the revenge for uthman's blood, but did he himself get revenge or justice when he became the caliph? Or was it all a ruse to become the ruler?
@@tenybhai they didn't know the murders
And in the time of Ali (RAA ) the murders were in the Ali's army
What kind of nonsense is this? If you are a sunni, you recognize Ali as rightfully guided. If you curse rightfully guided, what does that make you? Muawiyah cursed Ali. This is not disputed by anyone with half a brain. So if Ali is rightfully guided, and someone curses him, what is that person? Rightfully guided? I'd say no but..... make your own conclusions.
Fabrication to the core liar
Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!
Good point made that ' not everything written is true' but the fact that Muawiya cursed Ali is there in black and white. Upto the point where Omar Abdullah Aziz (ra) banned this practice 6 generations after Muawiya died. They both loved each other. If you love another human you do not go to war with the intention to kill someone you love. Your idea of love is obscure. Fact of the matter is tribal pride kicked in. Muawiya a ummyad could not tolerate A Hashimite (Ali a.s) to rule over them once again. As his father Abu sufyan fought tooth and nail against Prophet (s.a.w).
The disagreement with Ali a.s was to bring the murderers of Uthman to justice. How many of those did Muawiya bring to justice and courts when he was in power. None. It was just a excuse to wage an old fued with the Hashimite. Still had malice in their hearts.
narrated to us Abdulmuhaymin ibn Abbas ibn Sahl ibn Sad: narrated to me my father, from my grandfather that the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w) saw in his dream, Bani umayya clan jumping on his pulpit like monkeys. Thus he became so aggrieved by it that he never laughed as long as he lived and the Almighty Allah revealed the following verse: …and We did not make the vision which We showed you but a trial for men.
Tabari
Lol go off zindeeq.
@@a.conandoyle The truth hurts when you read what happened in history. The actions of some are quite surprising. That's when you start name calling because you are defeated.
So since you are a internet warrior and resort to name calling. Why do you call your father a zindeeq. Son of Misyaar Halala marriage. Or are you a son if a jihad al nikah marriage and your mum is like the runaway Shamima Begum
@@a.conandoyle is that the only answer you can give as you have no logic. Proves you are the son of a 1000 fathers
This is the best explanation. As a sunni I hold this view that muawyia had bad intentions and that's all. Bani ummayyed constantly targeted ahle bayt and murdered the descendents of the prophet.
Only telling half of the truth
معاوية (رضي الله عنه) يقتل حجر بن عدي (ع) لأنه من أنصار الإمام علي بن أبي طالب (ع) 😪😪
5:26… 😁😁 sahih Muslim 4776, sahih Bukhari 4108.
Here are 12 pieces of evidence that show that Mu'awiya used to curse, and encourage the cursing of, Imam Ali b. Abi Talib.
EVIDENCE 1 - IBN HAJAR AL-’ASQALANI
ثم كان من أمر علي ما كان فنجمت طائفة أخرى حاربوه ثم أشتد الخطب فتنقصوه واتخذوا لعنه على المنابر سنة
“Then it was the matter of Ali and a group of people fought against him, then the situation got more complicated and they began to belittle him and they made cursing Ali from the pulpits, a regular habit”
Source - Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7 page 57
EVIDENCE 2 - MUHAMMAD ABU ZAHRA
“And during the reign of Banu Umayya the dignity of Ali was attacked, he was cursed because Mu’awiya during his reign introduced the ugly bid`ah of cursing Ali.
His successors continued this tradition until the reign of Umar bin Abdul Aziz. The tradition entailed cursing the Imam of Guidance Ali at the end of the Friday Sermons, the Sahaba’s remonstrations that this was wrong was ignored, Mu’awiya and his Governors refused to desist from their actions.
Ummul’Momineen Salma (ra) wrote a letter to Mu’awiya and his respective Governors reminding them that by cursing ‘Ali they were in fact cursing Allah (swt) and his Prophet (s)”.
Source - Ta’rikh Madhahib al-Islam, Volume 1 page 35
EVIDENCE 3 - AL-DHAHABI
He has recorded the following statement of an important early Sunni scholar called Abd al-Rahman b. ‘Amr al-Awza’i (d. 157 H):
سمعت الأوزاعي يقول : ما أخذنا العطاء حتى شهدنا على علي بالنفاق وتبرأنا منه
Al-Awzai said: ‘We didn’t obtain gifts until we testified that Ali was a hypocrite and declared our disavowal towards him”.
Source - Siyar A’lam al-Nubala, Volume 7 page 130
EVIDENCE 4 - AL-TABARI - A
When Muawiya Ibn Abi Sufyan put al-Mughairah Ibn Shubah in charge of Kufah in Jumada 41 (September 2- October 30, 661), he summoned him. After praising and glorifying God, he said:
“Now then, indeed a forbearing person has been admonished in the past… The wise might do what you want without instruction. Although I have wanted to advise you about many things, I left them alone, trusting in your discernment of what pleases me, what helps my regime and what sets my subjects [raiyyah] on the right path. I would continue to advise you about a quality of yours- do not refrain from abusing Ali and criticizing him, not from asking God’s mercy upon Uthman and His forgiveness for him. Continue to shame the companions of Ali, keep at a distance, and don’t listen to them. Praise the faction of Uthman, bring them near, and listen to them.”
Source - History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH, Execution of Hujr Ibn Adi, v18, pp 122-123
EVIDENCE 5 - AL-TABARI - B
“The Messenger of Muawiya then came to them (Ziyad) with orders to release six and to kill eight, telling them:
We have been ordered to let you disavow Ali and curse him. If you do so, we shall release you, and if you refuse, we shall kill you. “
Source - History of Tabari, English version, events of year 51 AH, v18, p149
EVIDENCE 6 - AHMAD B. HANBAL
“From Abdillah al-Mazini who said: ‘When Muawiya left Kufa he employed al-Mughirah ibn Shubah. ’He said: al-Mughirah hired orators to insult Ali’.”
Source - Musnad Ahmad, Volume 3 page 185
EVIDENCE 7 - HASAN B. FARHAN AL-MALIKI
والي المدينة وهو مروان بن الحكم في زمن معاوية كان يسب ويأمر بسب علي على المنابر، هذه حقيقة تاريخية ثابتة
“The governor of Madina, Marwan bin al-Hakam during the reign of Mu’awyia used to curse Ali and ordered the cursing of Ali from the pulpits; this is an affirmed historical fact.”
Source - Nahw Inqad al-Ta’rikh, Volume 3 page 22
EVIDENCE 8 - MUSLIM B. HAJJAJ
“The Governor of Medina who was one of the members of the house of Marwan called Sahl Ibn Sa’d, and ordered him to curse Ali. But Sahl refused to do so. The governor said: “If you don’t want to curse Ali, just say God curse Abu Turab (the nickname of Ali).” Sahl said: “Ali did not like any name for himself better than Abu Turab, and Ali used to become very happy when somebody would call him Abu Turab.”
Source - Sahih Muslim, Chapter of Virtues of Companions, Section of Virtues of Ali, Arabic version, v4, p1874, Tradition #38
EVIDENCE 9 - IBN TAYMIYYA
وقد كان من شيعة عثمان من يسب عليا ويجهر بذلك على المنابر
“There were from the followers of Uthman ones who used to abuse Ali openly from the Mosque pulpits”
Source - Minhaj al Sunnah, Volume 6 page 201
وأما حديث سعد لما أمره معاوية بالسب فأبى
“While the narration about Sa’d (relates to) when Mu’awyia ordered him to curse (‘Ali) but he refused”
Source - Minhaj al-Sunnah, Volume 5 page 42
EVIDENCE 10 - AL-QURTUBI
وقول معاوية لسعد بن أبي وقاص : ما منعك أن تسب أبا تراب ؛ يدل : على أن مقدم بني أمية كانوا يسبون عليا وينتقصونه
“The statement of Mu’awyia to Sa’d bin Abi Waqas “What prevents you from cursing Abu Turab” indicates that the first generation of Bani Umayya would abuse and belittle Ali.”
Source - Al-Mufhim, Volume 20 page 25
EVIDENCE 11 - IBN KATHIR
فاشترط أن يأخذ من بيت مال الكوفة خمسة آلاف ألف درهم، وأن يكون خراج دار أبجرد له، وأن لا يسب علي وهو يسمع
“He (Hasan) placed conditions of having five million from Kufa’s treasury, the income from the taxes of the city of Darabjird and not to curse Ali when he (al Hasan) could hear that”
Source - Al Bidayah wal Nihayah, Volume 8 page 17
EVIDENCE 12 - IBN ‘ABD RABBIH
“When Hassan bin Ali died, Mu’awyia performed the Hajj, and then entered into Madina where he wanted to curse Ali from Prophet’s pulpit, thus they said to him: ‘Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas is right here and he will not accept your behaviour, you should ask him first.’ Thus he sent for him and asked him about this to which he (Sa’d) said: ‘If you did it, I shall leave the mosque and never come here again.’
Thus Mu’awiya restrained himself from cursing (Ali) until Sa’d passed away, when Sa’d died, he cursed him (Ali) from the pulpit and also ordered his governors to curse him from the pulpits and they (his governors) did likewise. Then Umm Salama, the wife of the Prophet (pbuh), wrote to Mu’awyia saying: ‘You are cursing Allah and his Messenger from your pulpits and that is as a result of cursing Ali bin Abi Talib and his lovers and I testify that Allah and his Messenger love him.’ However he (Mu’awyia) didn’t pay any attention to her statement”.
Source - al-’Iqd al-Farid, Volume 3 page 300
Everything above is true but you misquoted they weren't referring to muawiyyah radiallahuanhu rather referring to his followers who did the cursing and he muawiyyah radiallahuanhu would remain silent in fear of them turning against him further proving he was a king caliph not one of the rashideen Quran and sunnah he had his mistakes which we don't deny and he was a sahaba who had good character and piety
When a sahaba make mistakes we take lessons from them not insult curse them and even if a sahaba is confirmed going jahannam we still love respect them as every muslim.enter jannah and even those sahaba do they will be of higher status then me and you
@@abdullahassaffahwhat to remain silent the maviyah rebel against hazrat ali to punish the killers of hazrat uthman but under his regin people where cursing hazrat ali and he was doing nothing ?
A ruler is responsible in islam
His governor Marwan use to abuse hazrat ali and he was sitting and watching this
Did he remove Marwan from the position of governor?
@@userxyz1511 boycott these type of people economically and socially never give your sons and daughters for marriage to them. This is the only lesson they will leave this misguidance and admit the fact. The first reply is so sinful. That's insane. Even after giving a big sources still denying truth then they say " I LOVE NABI Sallallahu alaihi wasallam "