To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Phymaths/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
I already admired "Zohar Ko" for his work on hidden local symmetry and quantum Hall droplets, and in this interview he didn't disappoint, in fact he revealed unexpected new dimensions to himself - he worked on MOND for years? he has positive words for Geometric Unity?? It's fabulous to see a truly independent thinker with his level of technical accomplishment.
@@Goat-e3g my uni invited him to a seminar online so we talked there I asked him about syk model and about mathematics he thinks looks promising for physics and what does he do with challenging problems that was all.
I did interview him but with some other hosts for another platform (link provided below). Will invite him to this channel as well. Thanks Link: th-cam.com/video/KJLSnHelrWQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zYvPl4RcGFG6ugmC
Hassan if you want to talk about loop quantum gravity, talk to an expert rather than outsiders who, unfortunately for sociological reasons more than scientific ones do not delve deep enough into the literature to understand what LQG is, what its successes and limitations are and how it compares to string theory. PS: That animated background is really annoying especially for those with visual sensitivity.
Instead of dealing with the physics you are using ad hominem to discredit Komargodski. What he said about Quantum Gravity makes perfect sense: the Einstein-Hilbert action, similar to the chiral Lagrangian of QCD, is a description in the IR. It doesn't make sense to quantise it and expect that it will tell us something about the UV.
First of all, the section on LQG is about "Why people working on strings and string-inspired ideas don't engage with LQG?". For this question, I need to talk to people working on strings. Also, this isn't done for LQG alone in this episode. This is also done for MOND and Geometric Unity. The whole episode wasn't centered around the description of LQG. If that was the main focus of this episode, I agree that I should have called a scientist working on LQG. Also, I find it really hypocritical that people working in different fields (sometimes not even working on hep-th) consider it fair game to give their opinion on string theory all the time but get annoyed when string theorists give their opinion about the field of these people. I am sorry but I am taking none of the first part of your criticism. The background can be better and I am in the middle of working on a new template. Although I disagree that it is annoying, I do agree that the template can be improved (that work is in progress).
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Phymaths/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
I already admired "Zohar Ko" for his work on hidden local symmetry and quantum Hall droplets, and in this interview he didn't disappoint, in fact he revealed unexpected new dimensions to himself - he worked on MOND for years? he has positive words for Geometric Unity?? It's fabulous to see a truly independent thinker with his level of technical accomplishment.
One of the best and professional hep- th podcasts. Thanks to you and Prof. Komargodski.
Thanks. I am glad that you liked it ✌️
sorry for the typo but I think he is really a no bullshit guy and a very honest man.
I agree
Love your channel. Great podcast.
Thanks! 🙏
This is such an incredible podcast
Thanks
Hassan I had a conversation with Dr subhir sachdev u should ask him to come on the podcast .
when did you talk with him?
@@bobjones5869 my uni invited him to a seminar talked to him there it was online.
How you talked with him email. What did you talked to him
@@Goat-e3g my uni invited him to a seminar online so we talked there I asked him about syk model and about mathematics he thinks looks promising for physics and what does he do with challenging problems that was all.
I did interview him but with some other hosts for another platform (link provided below). Will invite him to this channel as well. Thanks
Link: th-cam.com/video/KJLSnHelrWQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zYvPl4RcGFG6ugmC
Love this one
Thanks
Amazing podcast!
Thanks for watching ✌️
Zohar at his best!
Woww I used to think that too abt the no of papers lol
Invite Dr Mir Faizal
Hassan if you want to talk about loop quantum gravity, talk to an expert rather than outsiders who, unfortunately for sociological reasons more than scientific ones do not delve deep enough into the literature to understand what LQG is, what its successes and limitations are and how it compares to string theory.
PS: That animated background is really annoying especially for those with visual sensitivity.
Instead of dealing with the physics you are using ad hominem to discredit Komargodski. What he said about Quantum Gravity makes perfect sense: the Einstein-Hilbert action, similar to the chiral Lagrangian of QCD, is a description in the IR. It doesn't make sense to quantise it and expect that it will tell us something about the UV.
First of all, the section on LQG is about "Why people working on strings and string-inspired ideas don't engage with LQG?". For this question, I need to talk to people working on strings. Also, this isn't done for LQG alone in this episode. This is also done for MOND and Geometric Unity. The whole episode wasn't centered around the description of LQG. If that was the main focus of this episode, I agree that I should have called a scientist working on LQG.
Also, I find it really hypocritical that people working in different fields (sometimes not even working on hep-th) consider it fair game to give their opinion on string theory all the time but get annoyed when string theorists give their opinion about the field of these people. I am sorry but I am taking none of the first part of your criticism.
The background can be better and I am in the middle of working on a new template. Although I disagree that it is annoying, I do agree that the template can be improved (that work is in progress).