Great question. Judge Hippler's Oct. 9th order directed State & Defense to disclose their expert witness materials to each other. It did not order State & Defense to file anything on the docket. We will know more when the Dec. 27th motion to compel/for sanctions hits the docket.
I'm glad it helps. there's more information on yesterday's filings on the podcast (where I learned the necessity to speak slowly for my international audience & due to no visuals1 Thank you for your comments, Kathy
Great analysis, thank you! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
When I pause 3:39 I look at the footnote and know that Judge is speaking to Anne here. He does not want her waiting until the last minute to file things then asking for a postponement. I'm so glad he's putting his foot down.
It may well be. I for one was quite surprised the critical Franks Motion needed to be refiled by entry of the Nov. 22, 2024 court order due to the condition of that motion. Thanks for your input, Kathy.
@@KathysIndieZoNe I thought it needed to be refiled because of the 2000 pages of most irrelevant information. Now all of a sudden she wants it sealed due to "safety concerns". Sounds to me there is still irrelevant information there that she doesn't want the public to realize that her motions have irrelevant information in them. She's filing numerous pages to give the impression something is there, imo.
@@Pllm30 Indeed. J. Hippler stated in the Nov. 22, 2024 order some 2000 pages of largely duplicative information was submitted when he gave defense an opportunity to refile. Given the standard for a Franks hearing requires a "substantial" initial proffering of evidence, I expected the filing would be in pristine condition with everything pinpointed to the record evidence submitted.
As we reviewed this morning, it is encouraging to see a judge committed to conducting proceedings with clarity and precision. This approach not only upholds the integrity of the judicial process but also ensures the victim’s fundamental right to fully comprehend and follow the matters at hand. We are not advocates for obscuring the truth-the jury will be presented with the facts, and if those facts cast guilt upon a party, so be it.
I wholeheartedly agree. Judge Hippler in my opinion is running this case as if it was an appellate proceeding. His rulings thus far have been IMO fair and based on the law. Hearings on the DP motions were managed as appellate proceedings are. He's received the motions, responses and replies and knows what the say. Oral argument is a time to stress 2-3 key points, answer the court's questions and sit down. Not go over the entire motion or response once again. This approach is what I'm anticipating at the Jan. 23rd hearings on the motions to suppress. In my opinion his management of the case thus far also minimizes the risk of success on any appeal. Thank you so much for your comments. I appreciate them very much, Kathy
But will you accept his innocence if those facts are not presented @GonzoOGi ? Will you accept you have been lied to and led into submission by inept LE? Take a step back mr G look at where you have gotten your information from? Look at the people that say they support you and ask yourself what their intentions are? Justice? Self gratitude? Or do they simply just want to make you feel better by feeding you utter nonsense? You know damn well the prosecutions case is circumstantial at best! Do you think they have ever been honest with you about anything? Example.., telling you a whole nonsense story about why Bryan was wearing street clothes back in Latah? About it being a tactic to not taint the jury pool?…. Maybe in reality he is under your constitution considered to be innocent until proven otherwise and has rights… I know all about the web of nonsense you have helped spread and whom you have done it with,. I know all the players and have been following the money for a while, be careful mr G because if things continue you are at risk of blowing this case! And if he is guilty could very well walk free because of it! If he is innocent you my friend are back to square one! I hope you don’t read this as hateful because it is not my intention, I want you to get the truth 💙💙
Tommy Jude at Once Upon A Crime Time recommended your channel. Thank you Kathy.
Thank you 🤗 counting down hours now to your first live!!!
Great news Nena! :)
Thank you Kathy!
Thanks!❤
You are most welcome. I appreciate the support, Kathy
Thanks for the clarification.
Trying to understand whether prosecution filed their witnesses as per the schedule? I have not seen anything 🤔
Great question. Judge Hippler's Oct. 9th order directed State & Defense to disclose their expert witness materials to each other. It did not order State & Defense to file anything on the docket. We will know more when the Dec. 27th motion to compel/for sanctions hits the docket.
@ thank you!
Thank you so much for reading slowly it helps me personally more than you know !
I'm glad it helps. there's more information on yesterday's filings on the podcast (where I learned the necessity to speak slowly for my international audience & due to no visuals1 Thank you for your comments, Kathy
@ your welcome it’s hard enough to understand all these documents for me ! So it really helps !
Great analysis, thank you! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
When I pause 3:39 I look at the footnote and know that Judge is speaking to Anne here. He does not want her waiting until the last minute to file things then asking for a postponement. I'm so glad he's putting his foot down.
It may well be. I for one was quite surprised the critical Franks Motion needed to be refiled by entry of the Nov. 22, 2024 court order due to the condition of that motion. Thanks for your input, Kathy.
@@KathysIndieZoNe I thought it needed to be refiled because of the 2000 pages of most irrelevant information. Now all of a sudden she wants it sealed due to "safety concerns". Sounds to me there is still irrelevant information there that she doesn't want the public to realize that her motions have irrelevant information in them. She's filing numerous pages to give the impression something is there, imo.
@@Pllm30 Indeed. J. Hippler stated in the Nov. 22, 2024 order some 2000 pages of largely duplicative information was submitted when he gave defense an opportunity to refile. Given the standard for a Franks hearing requires a "substantial" initial proffering of evidence, I expected the filing would be in pristine condition with everything pinpointed to the record evidence submitted.
Good info. ❤
@@Pllm30I think safety concerns are legitimate with this case.
As we reviewed this morning, it is encouraging to see a judge committed to conducting proceedings with clarity and precision. This approach not only upholds the integrity of the judicial process but also ensures the victim’s fundamental right to fully comprehend and follow the matters at hand. We are not advocates for obscuring the truth-the jury will be presented with the facts, and if those facts cast guilt upon a party, so be it.
I wholeheartedly agree. Judge Hippler in my opinion is running this case as if it was an appellate proceeding. His rulings thus far have been IMO fair and based on the law. Hearings on the DP motions were managed as appellate proceedings are. He's received the motions, responses and replies and knows what the say. Oral argument is a time to stress 2-3 key points, answer the court's questions and sit down. Not go over the entire motion or response once again. This approach is what I'm anticipating at the Jan. 23rd hearings on the motions to suppress. In my opinion his management of the case thus far also minimizes the risk of success on any appeal. Thank you so much for your comments. I appreciate them very much, Kathy
But will you accept his innocence if those facts are not presented @GonzoOGi ?
Will you accept you have been lied to and led into submission by inept LE?
Take a step back mr G look at where you have gotten your information from? Look at the people that say they support you and ask yourself what their intentions are? Justice? Self gratitude? Or do they simply just want to make you feel better by feeding you utter nonsense?
You know damn well the prosecutions case is circumstantial at best! Do you think they have ever been honest with you about anything? Example.., telling you a whole nonsense story about why Bryan was wearing street clothes back in Latah? About it being a tactic to not taint the jury pool?…. Maybe in reality he is under your constitution considered to be innocent until proven otherwise and has rights…
I know all about the web of nonsense you have helped spread and whom you have done it with,.
I know all the players and have been following the money for a while, be careful mr G because if things continue you are at risk of blowing this case! And if he is guilty could very well walk free because of it!
If he is innocent you my friend are back to square one!
I hope you don’t read this as hateful because it is not my intention, I want you to get the truth
💙💙
BK is innocent.