My all-in-one calculus problem
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- Learn more calculus on Brilliant: 👉brilliant.org/blackpenredpen/ (now with a 30-day free trial plus 20% off with this link!)
I made this all-in-one style calculus problem for you as an early Christmas gift. We will find the derivative of sin^2(x^2), which requires the chain rule twice, then we need to find a closed form for the infinite power series 1+x^2+x^4/2+x^6/6+..., then we have the limit of sqrt(x)/ln(x) and the limit of ln(x)/sqrt(x) as x goes to infinity. Finally, we will put everyone together and integrate it!
#calculus #math #challenge #blackpenredpen
🛍 Shop my math t-shirt & hoodies: amzn.to/3qBeuw6
0:00 Christmas is coming, so I made an all-in-one calc 2 problem or you
0:20 limit of ln(x)/sqrt(x) as x goes to infinity
1:45 derivative of sin^2(x^2), chain rule twice!
2:57 Power series for 1+x^2+x^4/2+x^6/6+...
4:00 solving the integral
----------------------------------------
💪 Support the channel and get featured in the video description by becoming a patron: / blackpenredpen
AP-IP Ben Delo Marcelo Silva Ehud Ezra 3blue1brown Joseph DeStefano
Mark Mann Philippe Zivan Sussholz AlkanKondo89 Adam Quentin Colley
Gary Tugan Stephen Stofka Alex Dodge Gary Huntress Alison Hansel
Delton Ding Klemens Christopher Ursich buda Vincent Poirier Toma Kolev
Tibees Bob Maxell A.B.C Cristian Navarro Jan Bormans Galios Theorist
Robert Sundling Stuart Wurtman Nick S William O'Corrigan Ron Jensen
Patapom Daniel Kahn Lea Denise James Steven Ridgway Jason Bucata
Mirko Schultz xeioex Jean-Manuel Izaret Jason Clement robert huff
Julian Moik Hiu Fung Lam Ronald Bryant Jan Řehák Robert Toltowicz
Angel Marchev, Jr. Antonio Luiz Brandao SquadriWilliam Laderer Natasha Caron Yevonnael Andrew Angel Marchev Sam Padilla ScienceBro Ryan Bingham
Papa Fassi Hoang Nguyen Arun Iyengar Michael Miller Sandun Panthangi
Skorj Olafsen Riley Faison Rolf Waefler Andrew Jack Ingham P Dwag Jason Kevin Davis Franco Tejero Klasseh Khornate Richard Payne Witek Mozga Brandon Smith Jan Lukas Kiermeyer Ralph Sato Kischel Nair Carsten Milkau Keith Kevelson Christoph Hipp Witness Forest Roberts Abd-alijaleel Laraki Anthony Bruent-Bessette Samuel Gronwold Tyler Bennett christopher careta Troy R Katy Lap C Niltiac, Stealer of Souls Jon Daivd R meh Tom Noa Overloop Jude Khine R3factor. Jasmine Soni L wan na Marcelo Silva Samuel N Anthony Rogers Mark Madsen Robert Da Costa Nathan Kean Timothy Raymond Gregory Henzie Lauren Danielle Nadia Rahman Evangline McDonald Yuval Blatt Zahra Parhoun Hassan Alashoor Kaakaopuupod bbaa Joash Hall Andr3w11235 Cadentato Joe Wisniewski Eric Maximilian Mecke Jorge Casanova Alexis Villalobos Jm Law Siang Qi Tancredi Casoli Steven Sea Shanties Nick K Daniel Akheterov Roy Logan
----------------------------------------
Thank you all!
Learn more calculus on Brilliant: 👉brilliant.org/blackpenredpen/ (now with a 30-day free trial plus 20% off with this link!)
i like how the limits of integration are actual limits
I've always preferred the term "bounds of integration". I mean, considering that we're already using the word "limit" for something else in calculus, doesn't it make sense to use a different word here?
nothings better than solving an integral on Christmas's
its christmas?
Agreed
@@hanckNCRit's always Christmas if you have integrals to solve
@@michalkrawczak😔
And Christmas also happens to be the birthday of Newton, who invented calculus.
I've graduated from a mathematical school and even went to Mathematics faculty at the university for a year before changing my mind and becoming a general surgeon... It was a very tough decision as there was no scientific material that didn't interest me at the time... But maths has always remained my love and mania and I've always benefited from the knowledge while creating various complex macros for my work... However, I had almost forgotten most of its juicy parts... It's been more than 36 years after all! Now, I am retired and very much enjoy your videos, remembering and solving them in parallel... It charges my batteries and gives me a sense of satisfaction like winning a chess match! Thank you very much! You are doing a great job!
Thank you so much for the comment!
Every scary problem is not necessarily tough &
Every tough problem isn't scary😊
😱(lol)
Only thing scary is his face in the thumbnail 😂😂 but fr tho great video
Is this TH-camr from China if yes then the china is my favorite country 😂
@@AdityaMishra-nd7cq he is a Taiwanese living in america
chuck norris says ..."hold my beer"
Imagine checking your socks at early morning and finding a paper with this integral written and a message from Santa : "Integrate the above to receive gift"
well worry no longer my friend.
to end with a repeating integral, brilliant problem!
This guy can intimidate you with full innocence.
Ok. Trying first before seeing the video.
Step 1: Evaluate limits. On the bottom one, use L'Hopital rule and get (1/x)/(1/2√x). Simplify and get 0.
The top one use L'Hopital rule to get (1/2√x)/(1/x). Simplify and it diverges.
Step 2: Derivative. Just use the chain rule twice.
f(y)= y²
y(t)= sint
t(x)= t²
df/dx = df/dy • dy/dt • dt/dx
= 2y • cost • 2t
Recall the definitions of the variables:
2•2x•sinx•cosx
Step 3: Power series. Recall the Maclaurin series for e^x, then put x² as the input. That easy. e^x².
Step 4: The monster. The integral looks like 0-inf∫ 2•2x•sinx•cosx• e^-x² dx. Use substitution j=x², dj=2xdx (bounds of integration stays the same and we already have dj in the integral)
=0-inf∫ 2•sinx•cosx•e^-j dj
Recall doble angle formula for sinx and name the integral I:
0-inf∫ sin(2j)•e^-j dj = I
Use IBP or DI method, just the same:
D:
+ sin(2j)
- 2cos(2j)
+ -4sin(2j)
I:
e^-j
-e^-j
e^-j
After the setup, this ends like:
I = (sin(2j)•e^-j)]0-inf + (2cos(2j)•e^-j)]inf-0 - 4I
Notice that first term goes to 0 and in the second term I changed the bounds thanks to the minus sign. Now, in the second term, the limit as j approaches 0 is 2 and when j approaches infinity is just 0 thanks to the exponential and the squeeze theorem. So, finally:
I = 2 - 4I
5I = 2
I = 2/5
Thanks for reading, love you.
Interesting
i've just realized by reading your comment that IBP is short for "integration by parts"
@@cemsaglam9241 Yeah, it's a confusing way to write it. I first got confused because in spanish it is just simply despicted as integration by parts or "the cow" (la vaca) because of some mnemotecnic to remember IBP.
That e^x² at the denominator was great . I was thinking it to be some different series and was thinking to use limit as a sum (converting an infinite sum to definite integral)
how did he get that though?
@@M7RAA use tailor series expansion on e^x you will get the series or if you know series of sine and cosine then also you can get that
After that replace x with x² and you will get the mentioned series
We can reverse it also by finding function with series by writing it as a limit on summation and then converting into Reimann sums then integrating
Been watching you for 2-3 years now as a highschool student and could finally solve on of your all-in-one questions by myself! Feels great to go from knowing nothing and just liking the magic numbers to solving something that looks scary (but really wasnt) all by my lonesome. Thank you for the content you provide!
i really liked this!! my first really hard integral that i solved first try! would love to see more power series-integrals
And it is a Laplace transform in the end.
All of calculus 2 summarized in 11mins. Awsome!
I’m only a freshman so I’m taking algebra 2 honors right now. I must say this looks way harder than what I do in class right now (which is a pretty low standard) but if you’re interested in the subject it shouldn’t be too bad.
@@xum0007Algebra II also called "Linear Algebra"? After the diagonalization content it can get a little more complicated depending on your teacher.
@@matheusdossantos9252 I don't think he means linear algebra
The numerator was easy but I couldn't guess the denominator part 👍👍
When you got to the final form of the integral, I would just use contour integration to get the answer. I dont like doing that much integration by parts. And also that series in the numerator arent necesserily described by the e to -x squared formula. As you wrote only a finite number of parts, in this case four, there is an infitnite amount of formulas for these four parts of the series. One could pick that after x^2/6 would come 69 and find a formula for this, with use of the Gregory-Newton formula.
That was great!! It's like quick revision
You are really awesome!!! Actually, thank you for what you are doing, I'm into mathematics even more because of your videos and I'm really having fun watching them. Please, keep it up. These videos really make my day
Love these kind of questions, keep it up!
It’s not Christmas without integration!
"Two limits, a derivative, a power series, and an integral wander onto a board..."
I’ve been wanting another all in one problem for a while now, thanks for the early present!
We should have an advent of integration. Each day a new integral problem
Thanks PROF 👍
So what’s the answer to 1/5 + 1/5 ?
BlackPenRedPen: sooo actually
What a thrilling problem! I’ll give it a go myself closer to Christmas!
I once saw an integral that had integrals as limits of integration, lol.
It's amazing 😃❤️
Loved it
My calc professor will love this, thanks
ty much appreciated
Wonderful!!!😊
Love the Christmas T-shirt !
Thanks professor!!! Christmas is coming and I have to find a crazy Christmas problem for my channel!!!🎄🧑🎄🤶
PS. Not as crazy as yours!!! I wouldn't be able to come up with something like this!!!🤩🤗
Thanks a lot for this years Christmas present 😂😂😂 but I might return it later haha
Merry Calcu-mas!
Merry Christmas 2u 😃
Qué EJERCIZASO!!!! I LIKE IT, THANK YOU!!!!!
It is to early for I still have calc lectures but when Christmas comes be assured that I will solve it
Best Christmas gift I've ever received lol
First time I'm actually able to solve one of these!!
The kid who just guesses 2/5😂
Yess!! Done in the first attempt. Good question
Great work!! But i think it is more likely for Halloween, not Christmas.
lol, it should really be for Thanksgiving since it's just next week! haha
@@blackpenredpen Maybe this question fits all 3 festivals. When seeing it in the beginning, it is so horrible for Halloween. When solving it, it is like the games of finding eggs in Thanksgiving. And finally you reveal the solution with clear steps; which is just a Christmas gift. So cool.
do you have any plans on doing calc 3 stuff, would love to see more of that
I have not watched it yet... But please tell me it's 2/5
Edit: Ok, I messed up somewhere at plugging infinity at the last part (for some reason I forgot that even with infinity, the sin & cos function would be finite, and applied L'Hopital, somehow ended up having I=-4I, allowing me to say I=0 at x->infinity), but anyways the answer still ended up the same....
IT'S A CHRISTMAS MIRACLE!
Great christmas present
Thank you so much for this BRILLIANT vid and explanation!!
done!
gonna come back to this video in a year to see if I understand yet.
Yay - the answer is 2/5 for the 25th (of December)!
My boy's giving us a surprise in the denominator.
This is simply Laplace Transform
I likes your videos ❤. Love from india🇮🇳
This question is simple. The limits can be found easily, next I replace t=x^2 and come out with \int e^{-t}sin(2t) dt, and then I solve lim_{s -> 1} Laplace transform of sin(2t) by subtracting s=1 in the result.
make me fun as i do in cristmas . thanks bro . but quite a easy one
Sir do a Fourier transform of e power x
Strange.. The answer I'm getting is -(2/5). Based on (d/du)[e^(-u)*(sin(2u)+2*cos(2u))] = -5*e^(-u)*sin(2u). I checked that derivative carefully.
To get the limit why not put u = ln(x), then we have e^0.5u in the denominator and u in the numerator as u goes to infinity. This is obviously zero.
nice one
Nice bro
Ah damn, I was close. Been a while since I did calculus. I got the limits and the numerator right but I thought the denominator was cos(x) and then I was stuck, it is similar.
Tis the season.
Can u make a roadmap of mathematics and concepts in it😢
Bro just made calculus final boss 💀💀
Since it's my bday, i'll take this as my bday gift
I'm expecting that Mr Tsao could demonstrate how to solve ODE
Happy X-mass
I would like to try this before watching, but I don't understand the series in the denominator. Could you provide the next two terms, please?
SLOW DOWN ONE HOLIDAY at a time! We haven't even made it past Thanksgiving yet!
My bad 😆
the answer is -2/5 10:39 you mismultiplied - and - (the second - is just for sin0 which is 0)
i thought you are gonna talk about the Gaussian Integral when i saw e^x^2, it's almost, phew
Wow, incredible. 💪
But isn't the final answer supposed to be -2/5 ?
Bro function is always positive so answer should be positive
@@ABHIGAMING-yo9myThe function f(x) = sin(2x)e^(-x) is not always positive on [0, inf), but ∫₀^∞ f(x)dx is still equal to 2/5.
Is it OK to plug in the limits of integration while still in the u world?
Hey, I'm preparing for university which I expect will include a MASSIVE amount of mathematical and calculus material. What do you recommend I do to self study?
Hello, how to solve factorial equations like this:
3x!-x^x-2=0
do you have a video about this?
0,1,2 are trivial solutions, but for different numbers that looks really hard... interesting looking problem type.
If x's domain is positive integers:
You can just do some bounding. Rearrange to 3x! = x^x + 2 and notice that the RHS grows much faster than the LHS, to formalize it you can prove by induction that for x>= 3 x^x > 3x! and thus all solutions will be smaller than 3 and you can easily check that 0,1 and 2 works as richard stated
Which of the following sequences could represent the impulse response of a stable discrete-time system?
k^2
(-0.65)^k
2^k
ksin(k)
Solve this without denominator
Please solve this integration.. integral of (32-x^5)^(1/5)🙂
u sub?
@@TozzaYT mathematics🙂
i wanted to know how does trigonometric substitution work when you substitute sinx or cosx as they can only have the value from -1 to 1.
i think that the limit of sinx /e^x when x goes to infinity the sine function goes to a finite value 1 or -1 but e^x goes to infinity then the limit will be zero but I don't know it will be 0 plus or 0 minus
If you're talking about the final limit. When you have a bounded numerator and a denominator that goes to infinity. You can just conclude the limit goes to zero. And the reverse goes to infinity.
@@abcd-ug8tj Yeah, I forgot that was a thing 😅.
I was close except for the power series because I started at 1 instead of zero, which is where I got lost. I got x^(2n-2)/(n-1)! for the series, starting at 1 which fits. Does anyone know if you could still solve it this was this series or does a power series have to start at 0? (Power series is my weakest topic I don’t understand them well)
we can solve it by gama function
Very nice. Now let’s see Paul Allen’s integral…
Nah I’m just joking Paul Allen couldn’t top this one 😂
Isn’t it -2/5?? Because it was (-sin2u + 2cos2u )/(5e^u), so (-) ALL of that is (-2*1)/5 at the end!! No?
Even I think the same
@@saadansari1757yeah, Idk why he didn’t put a (-) on the cos at the end.
It is actually -(sin2u + 2cos2u)/(5e^u) , here -ve is in the outside. During the application or the upper and lower limit of integral, we got -(-(2/5)).
I don't think in any part of the video it showed the -ve only on sin(as your comment suggests)
@@MichaelZankelthe minus never got distributed in the expression. Look at the brackets carefully
@@Anmol_Sinha okay thanks
When evaluating the numberator for u=inf, you say it's finite so its precise value doesn't matter. However, how do you account for the fact that sin(2u)+2cos(2u) can sometimes equal 0? Why is it okay to assume it's non-zero in the limit?
Sine and cosine are both functions of exponential order. This means that an exponential decay function as its input goes to infinity, will shrink to zero either faster than these functions, or as fast as these functions. This is one of the criteria for a Laplace transform to exist, is that the function has to be of exponential order, which is why sine and cosine have Laplace transforms, but secant and tangent do not.
Can you explain the math behind cos, sin , tan etc. Like how did cos(45°)=1/sqrt(2).
More generically how would you hand calculate the value of cos(x). X being a random value
@@doug2855 power series
hey there i have an incredibly hard question for you:
try to find the integral of sqrt(3x²+x)
do you know to solve that?
I want to ask All you u Something If two infinity Have same sum Then both will equal? For example A= a+a+a+a.... ♾️ B=a+a+a+a...... ♾️ then A=B ?
Hey blackpenredpen is there in the complex numbers a function thats inverse equals it's derivative? Thank you
Interesting
I hate doing IBP, so I’d much rather decompose sin(2u) into its exponential form
If you close your eyes and squint your ears, you can almost hear Arnold Schwarzenegger teaching you maths
Aprovechando,señor Bpen-Rpen,las integrales √x.lnx y la otra lnx/√x, tienen la misma solución?
Se lo pregunto por que vi que les puso una de ellas a los alumnos.
Manejo que si tienen la misma respuesta,pero puedo estar equivocado
Consulto a uds,pero si tengo que pagar por la su respuesta, bueno dejémoslo así.
Hi, i was wondering if: lim n->∞ ((n^2)/(x^n))=1 has any solutions for x. And if not, is there any value, this could be equal to, so that it would have a solution? Im still in highschool and dont know how would i solve it. Love your channel.
It doesn’t have any solutions. If x1, the limit is 0 (because n^2=o(x^n) if x>1).So no solutions (you could have found this by yourself honestly…)
Oh what a wonderful Christmas gift!!
(Murmur murmur...)
shouldnt the final answer be negative 2/5 ?
İ have a problem and i think it can be a good question.
İf 3^x=x so x equals what?
Where does that sum definition of e^x^2 come from?
all nightmare come in one
Is there anyone who knows, approximate fractional form for e(euler's number)?Like we have 22/7 for π