I spent a year studying in Japan (in English) and I swear to god one of the lecturers actually used Japanese letters at variables at one point the madman
45 of 48 points were docked because you proved the exercise using a general LCH space instead of exactly R. The remaining two were for spending too many lines on a clearly trivial matter.
I remember a proof from a textbook along the lines of, "With a bit of algebra, we see that the right side can be written as…" and then spending about three hours unsuccessfully trying to work out how it's done.
4:32 Actually, as an engineering student, I can confirm that the real fundamental theorem of engineering is Lim_[GPA->0] (Engineering) = Business (Stolen from Reddit)
About the Kanji thing: aren't we actually running out of Greek letters by now? Aren't ~15,000 Japanese characters a good solution? I mean, you don't need to know what the characters mean to use them as variable names. And if you do know what they mean, you can actually have meaningful variable names _in math!_
Good MORNING fellow mathematicians! I suspected something was up when I saw the glasses: Papa is trying to make himself look smart. A venture doomed to failure :p
There is a package (xeCJK) that allows you to use Kanji, Hiragana, Katagana, Korean etc in Latex(XeTex to be precise) and it drives people correcting your homework crazy, espeacially if you use it in linear algebra ;D
At university, got a teacher who wrote a "-" in a formula and get with it for the end of the lesson. So, I raised my hand and told him it should be a "+". He replied that I was not correct. When leaving the room, he crossed the "-" to make it a "+"...I was right and he didn't want to give me credits and wanted to mess with me. The thing is that it pissed me twice because I was thinking of others too. But the truth is that it was a detail that everyone would forget. School is not only about the material. It's also a place to learn that you have to deal with things that are unjust and unfair. Life is neither "just" and "fair", it's random.
Hahaha cant u just answer directly lol I mean m not a big follower of his but I've seen papa flammy trollin him in his videos several times n I wanna understand pliis 😐😐😐😐😭😭
Damn those "the proof is left as an excercise to the reader" theorems. I often picture the author thinking "hmmmm, this proof is hard as nails. Oh, well I'll just leave it as an excercise just to fuck with the reader". And then proceed to laugh their ass off while they keep writing.
"Youlers formula and wheelers identity" some time you just nail it in the very beginning.hats off sir, it was brilliant I like the guy who holds his shirt down btw, what is that supposed to mean ?
@flammable maths papa flammy is the hard drive on the shelf at 3:43 the same one you pull out in one of your most recent videos? you call it a hard drive anyway
3:13 It's even worse when you're supposed to know something that is taught in a course that's nowhere listed as a prerequisite for the course you're taking.
I love linguistics... yeah!A veeeery old professor around here always spoke some shit in Latin in our classroom.. then I studied some Latin and later ancient Greek. I always... ALWAYS talk about this. I'll never forget about that fvcking lambda calculi book with Hebraic signs.. I felt "god dammit! wat I'm doing in my life!". we don't have enough symbols to "speak" mathematics lulz
My god I remember that symmetry on the integrand, they did give the explanation and hint but u refused to see it, I was so frustrated and at the same confident and i finally did end up looking at the hint though. I still can't believe I was that petty😅
The biggest disappointment for me, and I guess not just for me, was to learn about foundations of mathematics. Eg. the set theory crisis and while there was considerable effort put into unraveling the story, most of mathematics just went on with ZFC (which is really just turning your wishes into a definition) and be done with it. Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems and how little (successful) investigation happened after that. It seems that foundations of mathematics are so hard that the brightest minds will find the inconsistencies, but noone can unravel the structures.
u fkcn w0t m0? i'll have you know i graduated top of my class at physics university. [insert physics rant here][insert fortnite slang here] [insert value of X here] you're an existence proof to me, kiddo. Trivial and only mathematicians acknowledge it.
K_x is a subset of S: trivial The operation is associative: trivial The restriction of the operation to K_x gives a subset of K_x: two elements x^a and x^b for r≤a,b≤r+p-1 have x^a•x^b := x^(a+b). If a+b≤r+p-1 then r≤a+b≤r+p-1 so x^(a+b) is in the set. Else a+b≥r+p because a,b,r,p are all integers, so the proof proceeds as follows: r+p≤a+b≤r+r+p+p-2 so r≤a+b-p≤r+p-2≤r+p-1 but x^(a+b)=x^(a+b-p) by definition of p (specifically, a+b-p≥r as per our assumption in the else portion of this proof) so because x^(a+b-p) is in the set, the set is closed under the operation. K_x contains an identity element: trivial (by definition it is x^r) K_x contains an inverse element for every element in the set: trivial (for a given element x^a for r≤a≤r+p-1 its inverse is x^(r+p-a))
![You Laugh, You Integrate... [ feat. @AndrewDotsonvideos ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7zgCl9j-SjA/mqdefault.jpg)
Now I have nothing.
Lmao, come on wreck him Dr. Dotson!
I spent a year studying in Japan (in English) and I swear to god one of the lecturers actually used Japanese letters at variables at one point the madman
Was that like
2な = 4
な = 2
I used Chinese characters for integration by parts, I bet my professor was still confused till this day what I wrote on the exam 😂
@@ladasodaexplains3355 You just gave me ideas for my exams
@@ladasodaexplains3355 lol which character did you write?
@@simeondermaats な² = 7
"a non trivial exercise"
proofs like this are isomorphic to shitposts
@@PapaFlammy69 what was the textbook from which that non-trivial exercise line appeared?
"Yes, Andrew?" I'm dead
Integaral Bruh(威) d威
its even better because the kanji means intimidating
@@mmtf lol
I love reading math books in Chinese. Explanations there are just much clearer.
\int_{-\infty}^\infty bruh(ゴゴゴゴゴ) dゴゴゴゴゴ
@@dangernoodle2868
e^(iπ) = - 一
f(x) = f(零) + x/(一!) + (x^二)/(二!) + (x^三)/(三!) + (x^四)/(四!) + (x^五)/(五!) + …
You know it's good when you say euler twice but differently AND it's an Andrew Dotson parody
EULERn multiple ways to say mathematicians' names.
@@hasiumcreeper5384 Underrated comment
I was prepared was e=2.. heck even for pi=3... But God I wasn't prepared for e=pi
pi^2 = g
The complete version is: 4 = π = 3 = e = 2 = Φ = 1 = The points Andrew got
@@IQuick143cz wtf lol
pi = sqrt(g)
Weak, too weak. Ln(π)=1, fundamental theorem of engineering
“No way you can use something you’ve used in another course” why is this so true
We have luck ouf geometry prof allows us to use Ana 1/2 and LinA 1/2. The reason could be that she is the same prof
Fr bro
"Fundamental Theorem of Engineering", lol!
It works though. e=2 pi=3 and e=pi and sinx=x and cosx=1 you just have to write a small enough x preferably 0
@@livedandletdie x = lim x -> 0 (x)
@@livedandletdie dx outside the denominator.
Derive "wheelers" formula haha
“Mr. Dotson?”
“Yes, Andrew.”
I UNDERSTOOD THIS VERY WELL! 😂
"You're going to give a talk about Inter universal Teichmüller Theorem, you may have heard about it, it's pretty trivial". Bruh.
I could feel myself die inside when you said that, and I was just watching it!
The 1 page proof with 2 pages of references had me dead
"Mandatory stats class that everyone has to take"
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
My brilliant math friend is suffering through this right now at college
I'm defining my next function as bruh(e)
Mine shall be defined as なに(z)
Bru(h)
блин(п)
e(bruh)
45 of 48 points were docked because you proved the exercise using a general LCH space instead of exactly R. The remaining two were for spending too many lines on a clearly trivial matter.
Wheeler's formula and Yuler's identity
cool
Bruh I rate this a e/π 🔥👌🔥👌🔥
4:33 Oh! Now everything makes sense. That 3=2 discount advertisements were just using pretty advanced math.
When Netflix Adapts A Manga 😂
There is nothing worse than the good old "This part is left as an excersise for the reader." .
Integharal of bruh with respect to moment
the bruh moment of a probability distribution
I remember a proof from a textbook along the lines of, "With a bit of algebra, we see that the right side can be written as…" and then spending about three hours unsuccessfully trying to work out how it's done.
"bit of algebra" XD
4:32
Actually, as an engineering student, I can confirm that the real fundamental theorem of engineering is
Lim_[GPA->0] (Engineering) = Business
(Stolen from Reddit)
“I’m trying this for 45 minutes straight going nowhere”
That doesn’t sound long lol
You can get lost with a problem with 5 hours.
Hours? Well it may be days with algebra
If it’s a meaty problem, regardless of type, it’s weeks or months- and in the best cases, years :D
This video is like one big shitpost. I love it.
You switched from "yooler" to "wheeler" for "Euler" both in the same sentence, and even though it's a part of the joke, it is very frustrating lol
Kanji math notation sounds sicc, do it!
Andrew Dotson should definitely see t'is. Lmao
About the Kanji thing: aren't we actually running out of Greek letters by now? Aren't ~15,000 Japanese characters a good solution? I mean, you don't need to know what the characters mean to use them as variable names. And if you do know what they mean, you can actually have meaningful variable names _in math!_
Good MORNING fellow mathematicians!
I suspected something was up when I saw the glasses: Papa is trying to make himself look smart. A venture doomed to failure :p
As a math undergrad it hits me hard to see all my notes filled with theorem and lemmas while their proofs are left as an exercise...
There is a package (xeCJK) that allows you to use Kanji, Hiragana, Katagana, Korean etc in Latex(XeTex to be precise) and it drives people correcting your homework crazy, espeacially if you use it in linear algebra ;D
I died at "check for symmetry." Hits too close to home.
Discovered your channel recently and this is one of the funniest videos
Your collabs with Mr Dotson are also very on point!
Mr.Dotson i've got a question! Lost it there hahahahahahahah
At university, got a teacher who wrote a "-" in a formula and get with it for the end of the lesson. So, I raised my hand and told him it should be a "+". He replied that I was not correct.
When leaving the room, he crossed the "-" to make it a "+"...I was right and he didn't want to give me credits and wanted to mess with me.
The thing is that it pissed me twice because I was thinking of others too. But the truth is that it was a detail that everyone would forget.
School is not only about the material. It's also a place to learn that you have to deal with things that are unjust and unfair. Life is neither "just" and "fair", it's random.
You-ler
@@PapaFlammy69 do you know of the fundamental theorem of amateur engineering?
Oiler
Owler
@@PapaFlammy69 I think '' wheeler'' is best xD
Professor- "Compactness- ever open cover admits a finite sub cover"
me- "what?"
Professor-"Got that? Ok, moving on"
"THe Proooof is trUVIal and left as a more trivial exercise".
*Checks the book and reads 3 more.
Holy 🐄...
I am John Snow.
No jokes about Frog Toadwalker, but ok
I rly dont understand whats ur problem with dat guy can u explain pls 😐😐😐😐
@@nafissaatlagh206 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐
@@nafissaatlagh206 r/woooosh
Sas Kia sure, but before i do...Can you figure it out? Give this problem a try
Hahaha cant u just answer directly lol I mean m not a big follower of his but I've seen papa flammy trollin him in his videos several times n I wanna understand pliis 😐😐😐😐😭😭
nailed the british accent boi
I agree and I'm a Brit
"The Fundamental Theorem of Engineering" "Wheeler" "Youler" lmao XD
Wow! This is great hahahahaha! Even loved the mandatory statistics haha
Damn those "the proof is left as an excercise to the reader" theorems. I often picture the author thinking "hmmmm, this proof is hard as nails. Oh, well I'll just leave it as an excercise just to fuck with the reader". And then proceed to laugh their ass off while they keep writing.
Lol he said yooler and wheeler
Bruh this is pretty good. The one at the start was the best imo.
This is so amazing. Love it. Keep up the good work!
"Youlers formula and wheelers identity" some time you just nail it in the very beginning.hats off sir, it was brilliant
I like the guy who holds his shirt down btw, what is that supposed to mean ?
Isn't Euler's pronounced as Oiler's? but maybe that was part of the joke
1 out of 48 points! Why have I once again received 1 out of 48 points!?!?!?!?!?!?
'It's very trivial, only one page.' Yeah. You're not fooling anyone, I'm not a child anymore, bruh.
Hahahahahahaa super papa!!! The Teichmuller part was wonderful!
4:15 Oh MY GOD.
I felt that lol
That statement was 100% true.
I’m happy I chose applied mathematics. Ha
2:43 you can use the symetry/antisymetry argument only if you now the parity of bruh(z(x))
Papa Flammy: "So students, here's the new exercise SHIIIIIT" ... students: "oh that was a good SHIIIT".
I've literally had to learn how to write Schwabacher M in measure theory. It was the hardest part of that class, and that says something.
I immediatly sent this my friends, you are so genius.Keep up the good work.
Thank you for the video! All of you friends are super awesome! Oh, moments with this video are sad.
That symmetric integral thing is so relatable :'D
@flammable maths papa flammy is the hard drive on the shelf at 3:43 the same one you pull out in one of your most recent videos? you call it a hard drive anyway
und na ja du sagst ich glaub 'have a hard driven day'
"I'm so glad you're finally doing something right in your life. That you are doing a math course... for once."
I screenshot the nontrivial exercise shot from 7:13. Absolutely fucking hilarious.
3:13 It's even worse when you're supposed to know something that is taught in a course that's nowhere listed as a prerequisite for the course you're taking.
I love linguistics... yeah!A veeeery old professor around here always spoke some shit in Latin in our classroom.. then I studied some Latin and later ancient Greek. I always... ALWAYS talk about this. I'll never forget about that fvcking lambda calculi book with Hebraic signs.. I felt "god dammit! wat I'm doing in my life!". we don't have enough symbols to "speak" mathematics lulz
This was absolutley spot on and hillarious! As a Math student there is too much relatable content here xD
I would hate to take non-trivial math courses. O.O
My god I remember that symmetry on the integrand, they did give the explanation and hint but u refused to see it, I was so frustrated and at the same confident and i finally did end up looking at the hint though. I still can't believe I was that petty😅
6:34
6:45
pi^3 = 69?
Are we in engineering class here or what?
I lost it when u introduced the fundamental theorem of engineering around 4:30 ish
The biggest disappointment for me, and I guess not just for me, was to learn about foundations of mathematics. Eg. the set theory crisis and while there was considerable effort put into unraveling the story, most of mathematics just went on with ZFC (which is really just turning your wishes into a definition) and be done with it. Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems and how little (successful) investigation happened after that. It seems that foundations of mathematics are so hard that the brightest minds will find the inconsistencies, but noone can unravel the structures.
That English (??) Accent was hilarious he sounds just as distressed and ill as me in my head in a test when I can't answer the first page
trust me as someone who's taken 4 years of japanese you are gonna want to start using weird fish drawings for variables-
I always called Xi "the tornado" and I was hoping for a mathematical hadouken when I got into grad school
7:12 And his name was JOHN CENA?!!!
Are you getting me right now, are you kidding me right now?
Should have been "Yes, Steven?" :p
7:05 Page number pi? That sure doesn't look like the third page of the book
4:01 i really felt that. i have to do mandatory statistics and it is the worst.
2:09 smart people (flammy) love andrew
Owo
The first time is always a but awkward...
I‘m stuck at the Applied Math scene at the moment in my studies lol.
Hate your shirt btw. Everytime prof says that something is trivial I get triggered.
Yes it's a form of PTSD ;)
Where is that one page paper of IUT lol?
1 out of 48 points hits too close to home :(
I wrote in exam "Euclid's idendity"😂😂
"2 months later..." [spongebob voice]
Ah yes, the classic Wheeler-Youler formula!
How do you recommend that book? Kern- und Elementarteilchenphysik? It says it’s from 1988, do you find that it is still good?
>mfw wanting to study pure maths
"Hi, this is McDonalds. Can I take your order?"
Was erwartest du auch von einem Buch über Physik?^^
u fkcn w0t m0? i'll have you know i graduated top of my class at physics university. [insert physics rant here][insert fortnite slang here] [insert value of X here] you're an existence proof to me, kiddo. Trivial and only mathematicians acknowledge it.
"It happens every damn week" 😂😂
Just discovered your channel. Literally ROFL ❤️😂
*Subscribed
Schlagen Sie den Dollar-Laden für Verkleidungen Boi
neat editing
Wheeeeeler!
4:33 greatest one everrrrr.
:D
K_x is a subset of S: trivial
The operation is associative: trivial
The restriction of the operation to K_x gives a subset of K_x: two elements x^a and x^b for r≤a,b≤r+p-1 have x^a•x^b := x^(a+b). If a+b≤r+p-1 then r≤a+b≤r+p-1 so x^(a+b) is in the set. Else a+b≥r+p because a,b,r,p are all integers, so the proof proceeds as follows: r+p≤a+b≤r+r+p+p-2 so r≤a+b-p≤r+p-2≤r+p-1 but x^(a+b)=x^(a+b-p) by definition of p (specifically, a+b-p≥r as per our assumption in the else portion of this proof) so because x^(a+b-p) is in the set, the set is closed under the operation.
K_x contains an identity element: trivial (by definition it is x^r)
K_x contains an inverse element for every element in the set: trivial (for a given element x^a for r≤a≤r+p-1 its inverse is x^(r+p-a))
Man I'm living for this shit now
4:32 fundamental theorm of engineering