You Laugh, You Integrate... [ feat.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2020
  • Still looking for the perfect Christmas present? :0 Check out www.ridge.com/PAPAFLAMMY to get 10% off your WHOLE order + FREE worldwide shipping! =)
    10-15% Off all my Merch :) Use Code 42069 over on papaflammy.myteespring.co/
    10% Off ALL Newton's Cradles! =D stemerch.com/
    You Laugh, You Differentiate: • You Laugh You Differen...
    You Laugh, You Maths: • You Laugh, You Math......
    You Laugh, You Physics: • You Laugh You Physics ...
    Advent Calendar Playlist: • Advent Calendar 2020
    Skit Playlist: • Skits
    Integral PDF: www.researchgate.net/publicat...
    Today we play you laugh, you integrate! :D If you laugh, you have to integrate notational garbage, what a fun! :D Video sponsored by The Ridge btw! =D
    Help me create more free content! =)
    stemerch.com/
    / mathable
    papaflammy.myteespring.co/
    Merch :v - papaflammy.myteespring.co/
    www.amazon.com/shop/flammable...
    shop.spreadshirt.de/papaflammy
    Become a Member of the Flammily! :0 / @papaflammy69
    2nd Channel: / @npcooking69
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wanna send me some stuff? lel:
    Postfach 11 15
    06731 Bitterfeld-Wolfen
    Saxony-Anhalt
    Germany
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Twitter: / flammablemaths
    Instagram: / uncomfortably_cursed_m...
    Flammy's subreddit: / flammybois
    Facebook: / flammablemaths
    Want to know more about me? Watch my QnA! =D • Question and Answer Ti...

ความคิดเห็น • 624

  • @integralboi2900
    @integralboi2900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2347

    Andrew’s integration skills make me feel smarter

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +885

      If there's only one thing I know it's that \int lnx = 1/x

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว +262

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos xDDD

    • @integralboi2900
      @integralboi2900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Andrew replied ^_^

    • @thephysicistcuber175
      @thephysicistcuber175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Are we not talking about flammy just being a dumbo with d^2/(d^2+1)?

    • @user-en5vj6vr2u
      @user-en5vj6vr2u 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@thephysicistcuber175 they were both clowns the entire video

  • @flowerwithamachinegun2692
    @flowerwithamachinegun2692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2111

    "Everything is convergent if you're brave enough"
    I'm definitely taking this attitude to my next calc exam

    • @ammyvl1
      @ammyvl1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      No don't

    • @sigmundfreud4472
      @sigmundfreud4472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      I dare you to use the Riemann series theorem (or whatever it’s called) and just rearrange terms to show every divergent series converges to 69. ;)

    • @khaledchatah3425
      @khaledchatah3425 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ikr

    • @Krishnajha20101
      @Krishnajha20101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sigmundfreud4472 Nice. And username definitely checks out.

    • @fragileomniscience7647
      @fragileomniscience7647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Your prof be like: "Everything is a failed exam if you're brave enough"

  • @SV-yo6nq
    @SV-yo6nq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +986

    "-420 is approximately zero"
    "yeah for small values of 420"
    lmfao

    • @Smitology
      @Smitology 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No I missed the moment this comment reached 420 likes

    • @lukejames3039
      @lukejames3039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@Smitology it still is at 420 for large values of 420

  • @davidberardo93
    @davidberardo93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1009

    I never knew I needed competitive meme integral solving, but I need it

  • @josedavid8903
    @josedavid8903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +334

    There is nothing better than trying to solve integrals while a german guy laughs at you, it is definitely as good as it gets...

  • @lourencoentrudo
    @lourencoentrudo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +436

    Clever memes:
    Flammable Math:
    "Your sister could be dead":
    Flammable Math: LMAO DEAD SISTER

  • @6900xx
    @6900xx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +305

    12:07 "proof by knowing what the answer is" lmao 😂😂😂

    • @lior_shiboli
      @lior_shiboli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      7th grade me wished i could have used it

  • @luisantoniogarcia9894
    @luisantoniogarcia9894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +193

    "Anything is convergent is you're brave enough"
    I try to live my life by that marvelous phrase

    • @YaamFel
      @YaamFel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Spoken like a true physicist

  • @apk2626
    @apk2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +176

    If this is the level of humor you acquire when doing maths then I'm never stopping doing it.

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      :D

    • @catlavettosic825
      @catlavettosic825 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It does come with some problems...like trying to convince anyone other than other mathematicians that you are sane.

  • @aryandwivedi4875
    @aryandwivedi4875 3 ปีที่แล้ว +465

    Please keep this series alive haven't laughed this much in a while. Really keep this series going ahead.

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      :D

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@PapaFlammy69 can you integrate the gamma function please

  • @arsenmingo62
    @arsenmingo62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +507

    Dude, the last one's trivial. e = pi, so the integaral evaluates to zero.

    • @tomatenbomber8830
      @tomatenbomber8830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      they are making that joke in the video sir

    • @plainText384
      @plainText384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      When you realise that he could have just drawn some triangles to find the area under f(x) = x

  • @Naliathan
    @Naliathan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I'm so happy that I'm not only who forgets if int ln x = 1/x or int 1/x =ln x

  • @williamschmidt-hansen6311
    @williamschmidt-hansen6311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    "Whalecum to another video" 😂

    • @yamsang0__0
      @yamsang0__0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AGGHHHHHH

    • @mk-ki4ls
      @mk-ki4ls 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🐋 💦

  • @professionalprocrastinator8103
    @professionalprocrastinator8103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +128

    Andrew: *breathes*
    Jens: "Haha you laughed!!!"

  • @imagzz4942
    @imagzz4942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Favorite quote of the video: "Proof by knowing the answer".
    xd

    • @darkfinal9964
      @darkfinal9964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me, an Aerospace engineer student: "Mhh, I see nothing wrong here."

  • @rishabhscodes
    @rishabhscodes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    "Everything converges if you wait long enough" ~ Andrew Dotson.

  • @maclambert2932
    @maclambert2932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    Jens: Good morning fellow mathematicians
    Me (A mechanical engineering major): *Nervous sweating*

  • @clubstepdj
    @clubstepdj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    For the last one i used the "area method" since x is a simple function and the shape of area is just a trapezium
    = (f(π) + f(e))(π - e) / 2
    = (π + e)(π - e)/2
    = (π² - e²)/2
    = π²/2 - e²/2

    • @marinmaths3826
      @marinmaths3826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ikr idk why he didn’t graph it Lmaoo

    • @poutineausyropderable7108
      @poutineausyropderable7108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah. The area method is really simple. But it might be too easy.

  • @lainer4708
    @lainer4708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Engineers: Where's the table??

    • @HormersdorfLP
      @HormersdorfLP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Honestly true. I thought. These techniques and what the heck is a sec^2. That's gotta be in a table. Otherwise I am lost. I call it proof by someone elses work

    • @jeangtech1830
      @jeangtech1830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HormersdorfLP LMFAO

  • @mitchellsolano1631
    @mitchellsolano1631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    "Everything converges if you wait long enough." Spoken like a true physicist Andrew.

  • @roshanakadorabarrett562
    @roshanakadorabarrett562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Andrew’s integration skills are making me wish that I stayed in my mathematical career.

    • @josegabriellopez4456
      @josegabriellopez4456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can always use the mail.

    • @HDitzzDH
      @HDitzzDH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s never too late to switch.

  • @someoneuppingdudetechnical6320
    @someoneuppingdudetechnical6320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Andrew laughs while internally dying at 9:28 after being reminded of massive American college debt oof.
    I hope for him that it's not that bad

  • @xtremeblaze777
    @xtremeblaze777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Nobody:
    Not even Americans:
    Jens: "Hee"

    • @TheodoreTsatsaronis999
      @TheodoreTsatsaronis999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yet it is CORRECT !!! I'm Greek so ... I know how to pronounce it

    • @ijemand5672
      @ijemand5672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Shut the fuck up about "nobody" already

    • @chronicsnail6675
      @chronicsnail6675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      INCOMING ANGRY EUROPEANS

  • @randymi9334
    @randymi9334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    Andrew is proof you don't need calculus to do physics

    • @takeuchi5760
      @takeuchi5760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I mean he was probably rusty on integration or something, cuz you can go a long time without encountering serious integration while doing physics.
      But when you are solving real problems, you better know integration.

    • @leoman5481
      @leoman5481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@takeuchi5760 you can study maths and go a long time with out integration

    • @createyourownfuture5410
      @createyourownfuture5410 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@leoman5481 Yes except that the connection of branches in mathematics is just a mess, like for some reason the zeta function which is defined in the complex numbers gives information about the distribution of primes, which is dealt with in number theory. You just cannot say that you will never encounter integrals if you are a professional in other branches of mathematics.

  • @nyxalmagest7226
    @nyxalmagest7226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    This is absolutely amazing! as someone who enjoys integrating but doesn't love it, it was an amazing way of practicing, I paused and solved each integral with you guys! Although it began as procrastination I ended up practicing!!! And my exam is in 3 weeks!! Thanks!

  • @igormodesto3123
    @igormodesto3123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "good morning fellow mathematicians, welcbaktnuda veedio"
    accurate

  • @ayushsambher920
    @ayushsambher920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    19:22 You could have done +1 - 1 in the numerator and split the fraction
    It will become Integral of [1 - 1/(d²+1)]
    So that will be d - (arc tan d) + D

  • @felixmende2693
    @felixmende2693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Is one a nerd if one finds this genuinely entertaining?

    • @AJF1atharv
      @AJF1atharv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      nope

    • @alumnym8035
      @alumnym8035 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no

    • @julianrosenfeld7177
      @julianrosenfeld7177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. Source: am a nerd and finds this genuinely entertaining

    • @monavie9110
      @monavie9110 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      nah

    • @How2Helper2013
      @How2Helper2013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No. Source: I find this genuinely entertaining but I'm dumb as a brick.

  • @GanerRL
    @GanerRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "python can't do things like 420^71"
    ah, you appear to have forgot about one of python's coolest features, unbounded sized ints!

  • @machine4971
    @machine4971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I put the first integral into wolfram alpha and it told me “no result found in terms of standard mathematical functions”... holy hell

    • @knvids2812
      @knvids2812 ปีที่แล้ว

      New result didn’t drop

  • @alexanderjordan9894
    @alexanderjordan9894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Reading the rest of the meme is left as an exercise for the viewer" killed me

  • @qwertyman506
    @qwertyman506 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is unironically awesome practice for my test tomorrow as a calc2 student

  • @jessec4094
    @jessec4094 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    “Take a deep breath such that you don’t laugh”

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dude, a great collaboration! Awesome to see you guys at it again!

  • @timhaigis1087
    @timhaigis1087 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    For small values of 420 it is approximately 0...
    Seems legit

  • @terezazuskinova2926
    @terezazuskinova2926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Definitely doing this with my friend as a preparation for our upcoming calculus exam! 😂❤️great inspiration

    • @stuffz4040
      @stuffz4040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dude that is a brilliant study strategy for many classes, now I just need friends

  • @clevelandHater
    @clevelandHater 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve never seen someone so excited to show off their integral collection
    Awesome video :D

  • @HormersdorfLP
    @HormersdorfLP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Integrate x dx. Everyone: it's x^2/2...
    Him: let's substitute bs here and use e^some more bs.

  • @raghav9o9
    @raghav9o9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    19:44 that is the easiest integral of the whole video just +1 and -1 in the numerator and then separate the denominator, thus then you have to Integrate dd and -1/d^2+1 dd so the answer is d - tan^-1(d).

  • @vcl-eq3vv
    @vcl-eq3vv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I watched the whole thing. Loved every single part

  • @jatinyadav6957
    @jatinyadav6957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The collab i've been waiting for

  • @kshitijsalunke2620
    @kshitijsalunke2620 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    more of these videos needed

  • @LiamInviteMelonTeee
    @LiamInviteMelonTeee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Number 9: just write d^2 +1 -1 kid flammy 19:20

    • @xD-jm2ie
      @xD-jm2ie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Was gonna say... simplifies to d-(1/d^2+1) which are both standard integrals...

    • @tupoiu
      @tupoiu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      u still need tan substitution to integrate 1/(d^2+1)

    • @ethanbottomley-mason8447
      @ethanbottomley-mason8447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@tupoiu Not if you just say it is tan^-1 and leave the proof as an exercise for the reader.

    • @xD-jm2ie
      @xD-jm2ie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As I was saying, standard integral

  • @tridivsharma2342
    @tridivsharma2342 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Flammy please do more of these, this could be such a good series

  • @antaresguitar
    @antaresguitar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely awesome!

  • @fahyaz3643
    @fahyaz3643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Just sayin', but you could've just rewritten it like this instead;
    (d²+1)/(d²+1) - 1/(1+d²)
    and avoided all that monstrosity lmao.

  • @georgekikas
    @georgekikas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    30:54 Damn that's a surprisingly correct way to pronounce 'χ'

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      :)

    • @jimjim3979
      @jimjim3979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PapaFlammy69 as a Greek I AM PROUD OF YOY

  • @marshalepine248
    @marshalepine248 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Make more of these videos they are great.

  • @richardreasoner728
    @richardreasoner728 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bruh this is so creative. LOVE IT

  • @Astronautakaty
    @Astronautakaty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:31 it converges uniformly 😎

  • @1996Pinocchio
    @1996Pinocchio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I want to be as confident as Andrew!

  • @physicsforever4793
    @physicsforever4793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    28:43
    "Eins... Epstein's theory of heat capacity"
    Wtf!?!?!

    • @MrFram
      @MrFram 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      daily reminder that heat capacity didn't kill itself

    • @Exachad
      @Exachad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Andrew killed Epstein

  • @TheGrimravager
    @TheGrimravager 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this stuff reminds me of my time doing personal tutoring, amazing :D

  • @jeff_1300
    @jeff_1300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy canoli we have received yet another comedic addition to this lovely site

  • @SlipperyTeeth
    @SlipperyTeeth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    8:35 You can't interchange the limit. As written, you are asking for the limit of a constant number, so for example you could replace that limit with one approaching 72 and your answer shouldn't change. But by interchanging, you are taking the integral of a constant, and this constant does depend on the value the limit is approaching, but that wouldn't be the case if you were free to interchange them through the integral.
    You are playing too loose with dummy variables. The definition of the definite integral requires that its dummy variable be free to vary throughout its region of integration. When pulled inside, the limit that uses the same dummy variable places an additional restriction on the dummy variable that breaks the original definition of the definite integral.

    • @genie9845
      @genie9845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My thoughts exactly, the area function limit might differ for the general case

    • @Ryan-gq2ji
      @Ryan-gq2ji 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah, that integral didn't make too sense honestly. Letting a variable approach a constant but also integrating with respect to the same variable? Doesn't really make sense honestly

  • @davidsoncheng6905
    @davidsoncheng6905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You were right about question 9!

  • @Rancor9000
    @Rancor9000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the Forest Haven music in the background.

  • @arnau7915
    @arnau7915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jens and Andrew: *struggle when using common letters as variables*
    Greeks: First time?

  • @itratabbas7669
    @itratabbas7669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    NOTICE ME PAPA FLAMMY

  • @rayzhang3425
    @rayzhang3425 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh I just realized you put Child of Light soundtrack in the back! Thanks, I love it

  • @alphastar5626
    @alphastar5626 ปีที่แล้ว

    This humour is so niche, i dont know how i reached it but i love it

  • @sinan4495
    @sinan4495 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This gives me life

  • @isaacjohnson8752
    @isaacjohnson8752 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The solution to integral 3 was super cool!

  • @rockcandy41145
    @rockcandy41145 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make more of these

  • @T3WI
    @T3WI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That dd integral gave me a stroke

  • @thomasstokes9412
    @thomasstokes9412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @ 8:24 You can't interchange the limit and the integral in this case because the limit is respect the variable you are also integrating. If you work it out then you find that the answer is approximately -0.00543 (\int_42^111 sin(x)/x dx).

  • @jesusbianchi772
    @jesusbianchi772 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video cured my depression , flammable maths laughing is the best therapy

  • @klaus9107
    @klaus9107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    OMG Papa Jens, I think you made a mistake! Are you sure about interchanging the limit and the integral at 8:20? The evaluated integral does not depend on ∂ anymore, so the answer would be something with Si(x) because you could ignore the limit.
    The way you are doing it, you should include the d∂ in the limit, but then the integral would not make any sense.

    • @gdsfish3214
      @gdsfish3214 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Whatever he did there was definitely not correct lol. Since the integral from 42 to 111 is already a constant which does not depend on the variable, the limit would just be the constant. So the actual value of this limit would then be approximately -0.0054 according to wolfram alpha.

    • @Ricocossa1
      @Ricocossa1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The notation was ambiguous to start with, so one could argue that the ∂ appearing in the integrand is not the one from the integral, but the one from the limit. XD

    • @poutineausyropderable7108
      @poutineausyropderable7108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's like taking the limit as x-> 0 or 6.

    • @poutineausyropderable7108
      @poutineausyropderable7108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamjennifer6437 Fucking bot.

  • @elenaherreriascanas4693
    @elenaherreriascanas4693 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love that music from Child Of Light from the beginning!

  • @HarmonyHeart
    @HarmonyHeart 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello Papa Flammy ! I really love what you do on your channel ! This concept is soooooo cool ! If one day I want to reuse it, can I ?
    Keep doing the great work !

  • @bryantwiltrout5492
    @bryantwiltrout5492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You and Andrew are hilarious 😂😂 I cracked up every time Andrew had to say “approximately” when he had to integrate with respect to approximately. You guys should definitely do another one at some point.

  • @T3WI
    @T3WI 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my god I need more

  • @_kainya
    @_kainya 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Papa, are we having another Mathvengers special this year?
    I really love your videos btw!

  • @roccobrando4816
    @roccobrando4816 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a useful and instructive video contemporary! :)

  • @ferdinandherrmann6496
    @ferdinandherrmann6496 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    andrew you are the king fr

  • @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself
    @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great play along at home game!

  • @aweebthatlovesmath4220
    @aweebthatlovesmath4220 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's best idea someone ever had

  • @koelsche_falafel
    @koelsche_falafel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    honestly, I was laughing more about how you calculated the integrals in Dotson manner, than about the memes :D

  • @Wolkenphoenix
    @Wolkenphoenix 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The last integral was a banger :o

  • @jcudejko
    @jcudejko 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:39 I never knew I needed to hear a german gentleman say "that ain't bad, at all" so much but here we are

  • @mikoajmackowiak6993
    @mikoajmackowiak6993 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You uploaded this faster, nice.

  • @CrittingOut
    @CrittingOut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Andrew can you please give a physicists explaination for why using the riemann approximation is the best way to integrate

  • @noahmunz3201
    @noahmunz3201 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whenever I have doubt about my integrations skills watching Flammy's "hard integration" videos, I watch this.
    Then, I feel instantly better about my skills lmao

  • @vibhamahanth2439
    @vibhamahanth2439 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    MOREE!!!

  • @knobhack
    @knobhack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Literally my conversation with another smart kid in the class.

  • @mrstruggle2846
    @mrstruggle2846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the d^2/d^2+1, you could add 1 and subtract 1 in the numerator, so (d^2+1-1), then split into 1-(1/d^2+1) which integrates into d-arctan(d)+C

  • @rustprogrammer
    @rustprogrammer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the best video on the internet

  • @dhoyt902
    @dhoyt902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey FM, this is one of the best formats you have presented. You can def. milk this cow.

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But it's soooooooooooooo much editing XD

  • @qcard76
    @qcard76 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On a random note, I loved the Earthbound Zero music in the background

  • @ammyvl1
    @ammyvl1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    you could've just had him come upstairs instead of overlaying the videos

  • @ederavila7870
    @ederavila7870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the artwork on the Mandelbrot set :)

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      same! :D You can get it over on STEMerch.com :)

  • @1996Pinocchio
    @1996Pinocchio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Joke's on you, papa flammy. Python can calculate arbitrary large numbers, including 420^71.

  • @nickl6752
    @nickl6752 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope both of yall teach my future nonexsistent children.

  • @Astronautakaty
    @Astronautakaty 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hands down your funniest video 😂😂😂😂😂 Here's to your creativity 🥂😂

  • @ryanatashkar4977
    @ryanatashkar4977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I genuinely think you would be the best Maths teacher of all time

  • @RozarSmacco
    @RozarSmacco 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first integral is Coxeter’s integral. In Nahin’s Inside Interesting Integrals it was THE single, longest evaluation in the book.

  • @nicholasthesilly
    @nicholasthesilly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Andrew's "Lamaze class" comment was lowkey the funniest thing in the video.

  • @a.bergantini4129
    @a.bergantini4129 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This dude is so happy just because he is math with his friend... I wish I had a friend I could do maths with...

  • @belatijagadbintangsyuhada7341
    @belatijagadbintangsyuhada7341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your voice on integrating the dd one makes it even funnier haha

  • @jony27003
    @jony27003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Literally laughed my ass off for nearly the entire video 🤣