5:40 Richard. Put up all the argument you like (HWC, being a bully) the skoda is already past 3 cars before you get to the first one, I think it's safe to say they have priority. Your the bully here.
And they have right of way because they saw the oncoming vehicle and still committed to blocking the opposing vehicle's side of the road? Sorry if they had no vision of oncoming vehicle, I'd have agreed with you. But when ones own side of the road is obstructed you must give way to vehicles coming the opposite direction, when their side is not blocked!
@@neilmartin5345 At that point there was probably cars behind him, possibly still blocking the opposing vehicle's exit of narrowed road. If he'd have stopped, it would have been a stalemate/gridlock situation. The car moved voluntary as he slowed. I didn't see and bullying at that point! I wonder if you'd have held your ground, instead of letting the stream of cars clear the narrowed part of the road?
Where was he meant to go Richard? He was passing the parked cars before you got to them. Plus why didn't you wait further up the road whern the parked car was on your side. You're the mug here. Also rule 163 provides guidance on overtaking other road users not about passing parked vehicles.
He was meant to go into the space before the parked cars, the one he did eventually go into. If the obstruction is on your side of the road you give priority to oncoming vehicles. It's not as if he couldn't see Richard approaching. Rule 163 states "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road" So yes it does provide guidance on "passing parked vehicles". Despite the other motorist clearly being in the wrong Richard could have avoided conflict here by just letting the other motorist bully their way through.
@@Liverpool-s5n wrong, he'd already committed and was past 2 cars before cammer even reached the first. Cammer just wanted a clip and caused conflict for no reason.
6:02 Another ignorant and aggressive driver? Assuming Richard is speaking about himself here? The oncoming car was already committed before you even approached and were visible to him. Perhaps you should review said Highway Code Rule 163, or perhaps just driving standards in general before trying to blame someone for your error.
05:40 the car coming down the road has commited and the cammer should slow to a sensible speed to allow the vehicle to pass thus enabling EVERYONE to get on with their lives !
05:50 ignoring the rules didnt apply here until the cammer blocked the other car completly ( 163 - give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road )
@@Hu5ky This is for the Skoda, not the cam car. If the cam car was already there the Skoda would've had to wait for him to pass. But, the Skoda was there first, before the cam car. So had priority. Because when he began passing the parked vehicles on his side of the road the cam car wasn't there. Cam car on arriving should have let the Skoda pass, seeing as he was already committed, as others have said. Cam car in the wrong, not the Skoda.
It looked not obvious at all that the Skoda driver had seen Richard. They were from a slight bend and emerging from a dip. Meanwhile- Richard WAS acting like a dip !
3:50 - Go behind the HGV in lane 1 then you muppet. HGV's aren't allow in lane 3, you're hogging their overtaking lane. Here's a quick reminder for you, your speedometer can be up to 10% over your actual speed. You think you're doing 50, you might be doing 45, and that's why you're pissing them off with your lane hogging.
@@georgebarnes8163 That's a smart motorway hard shoulder. You're allowed to cross it when the gantry permits, which is likely the case due to roadworks in the far right lane.
@ No. if you look at your car speedometer it’s always 7/10% less than the actual speed. It’s because car speedometer should NEVER show less than the actual speed, they are always calibrated at 110% by automakers. Unlike the GPS speedometer. I don’t think it has changed over the year.
Richard, you are a terrible driver. Someone was already commited, and you had the room to just stop and let the road flow. Instead, you chose to just carry on like a stubborn buffoon, block up the road for everyone, and even delay yourself as well. There's just no need for that behaviour.
but it's 50mph... WELL DO THAT IN LANE 1 AND NOT LANE 2 YOU PRICK! If significantly slower vehicles are undertaking then you are the problem PSA you can drive at 55mph in a 50 average speed check and not 'done'!
@@georgebarnes8163 It's a smart motorway where you can switch lane even if it's a solid white line... defending a lane hogger as usual. It's the exact same destination.
Richard review channel You need to retake your driving test or look in the highway code, the car that you blocked LA 68 NFL had right of way because they were already committed and was almost through the gap when you drove up aggressively when you should of stopped and let them go, the MORONS on the roads of today made me stop driving
The driver coming down the hill could easily have waited at the top and should have before coming down as their side was blocked and they could clearly see the cam car coming who actually had priority but they still chose to come down anyway. There was no real " aggressive driving" and if that is the way you think then it's a good job you did give up.
@@underwaterbubbles Are you serious? The "Cammer" was way back and it was obvious to anybody to let the car coming down come through first. Who taught you to drive or have you not got a licence? Stick to Farting in the Bath with a stupid name like that.
@@doctorsocrates4413 I am 70 a car cut me up on a roundabout i honked he jammed on in front of me, he got out and said i might of known it would be an old twat who cant keep up with the speed limit, the speed limit was 40 he was doing at least 60 , he did not look british, this was Bradford where you need a crash helmet in a car.
5:42, the Skoda was well committed with no option to dive into a gap when you appeared in his sight, demanding priority. THIS is where you lift off and give him a decent chance to get out of the way. But you just had to play the "Me first; back up, loser" card. YOU are the arrogant bully, here.
Please rewatch the video. You'll see that Richard would have been visible before the skoda was passing that row of cars. He should have simply pulled into the gap (the one he eventually reversed back into) as rule 163 of the highway code tells him to, "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road". Seeing as the Skoda driver was bullying their way through Richard should have diffused the situation though and given way.
@@roaduser6438 Hello there when driving you have to deal with changing situations on the road all the time, including other drivers who either don't do the correct thing or do something which you weren't expecting. A good driver should be able to adjust their driving to take account of these drivers, lets face it they are everywhere, but in this instance instead of simply letting the car come by and tut tutting at him or throwing him a dirty look, Richard chose to create a situation that ended up making him look like an inexperienced amateur. He would have gained more kudos with the general public with a video pointing out "look at this idiot and how I managed to make it a non issue." Thank you for making your point with a reasoned and an objective view. All the best.
Actually the Skoda can see Richard at 5:40, when he had time to go into the gap. Seems to me the driver of the Skoda has terrible forward planning and was rightfully sent back to the gap.
@MazTheWizard You're entitled to your view, but I'd disagree with you on that point. There's an awful lot of others who appear to disagree with your assessment, too. All I will say is that I have no time for priority thieves, but would never have done what Richard did there.
Came to say the same thing, if there is a constant obstruction, like this, parked cars in a row, whoever commits has priority. Mr Richard's Review Channel need to revise the Highway Code. Oh, and then the irony at the end, he has to get past a parked Merc and forces the white Audi over! Richard = COTW!
Definitely not, if other drives keep making allowances for his crap driving, he will continue to drive like that and probably get worse. Good for you Richard.
1:45 - this is what happens when you don't drive to the rules of the road, the car coming from the left had give way markings, meaning they give way to you which is what they are doing. If you had driven past like he was expecting it wouldn't have caused any delay for that Golf and would have prevented this confusion of someone driving otherwise in accordance to the highway code and then forcing them to make a decision that they shouldn't have to make. I know you were trying to be helpful but its people like you that flash someone out whilst there's still traffic flowing on the other side of the road and cause an accident.
5:40. I think the Camer, should read all of Rule 163, as it also states that if a driver is committed, as in this clip, you should allow them to complete the manoeuvre. Also if both vehicles are committed (which the camer wasn’t) the driver who has the shortest and safest distance to reverse, should do so (which the camer had).
5:40. If I'd have been the driver of the car coming down the hill I would have just switched the engine off and sat there. The cammer knows nothing about the highway code and is just an ignorant bully in his car.
Is the skoda driver, who should have been able to see Richard approaching, also a bully? After all he shouldn't have started passing those parked cars according to the highway code. So why did he? "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road"
@@roaduser6438 I can't agree with you. The cammer was nowhere near the parked cars when the other car started to pass the parked cars. The rule also says if the oncoming car has commenced the overtake you are expected to give way, which is what happened. It also says that if both are committed the one that the one with the least inconvenience should reverse. This should be the one with the shortest distance to reverse. As the cammer hadn't even got passed two cars it should have been him that reversed. As a road user I thought you would know exactly what the highway code said.
@@MultiDoctordeath "I can't agree with you" That's fine but I'm happy that the highway code does. "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road". The skoda driver failed to do this. You can see that right? Getting there first has absolutely nothing to do with what the skoda driver should have done. I agree that once the skoda driver failed in his obligations the cammer should have given way. "This should be the one with the shortest distance to reverse" incorrect. You got it right first time. "the one with the least inconvenience should reverse". Having vehicles close behind you, or towing a trailer, or operating a large vehicle may make it more convenient for the one with the longer distance to reverse.
@@roaduser6438 I agree with you about whether there are cars behind but there is nothing in this clip to know whether there are vehicles behind the cammer. I'm glad you finally agree that the cammer should have given way. I'm sure many drivers would have done what the other driver did in the same situation. As I said if this had happened to me, which isn't likely as I always give way, unlike most drivers these days, I would have switched the engine off and just sat there.
@@MultiDoctordeath "I'm glad you finally agree" I never said otherwise, so you're wrong, I don't "finally agree" I've agreed all along. "I always give way" "I would have switched the engine off and just sat there" So you wouldn't always give way? In this situation the cammer thinks he's in the right because the Skoda should have ceded priority. And if the Skoda driver thinks he's in the right because the cammer should have ceded priority once the skoda was committed, you would have two juveniles sat there, with their engines off, blocking the whole road if they had your attitude. At no point whilst driving would I choose to purposefully be part of a road blockage in order to protect a fragile ego just because I believe I'm in the right. Point and laugh at them, be part of the solution and let everyone get on with their day.
Richard, when you quote rules please also check the section on commitment,, if you've already started your overtake,oncoming traffic should give way. Learn the rules before mouthing about others
Good. Maybe next time he won't try and force his way through. He could obviously see the other car approaching and should have stopped. But no, like you he's an entitled driver who thinks the rules don't apply to them.
Unlikely this Richard chappy was clearly visible to that approaching car. But even if so, why would anyone with any sense continue on to a confrontation. IF the Skoda ,or whatever it was driver had made a little mistake, the chances are they would've realised it and been gratefull for the Richard bloke to just ease off and stop if necessary to allow them through. Richard would've probably got a hand up and a curtious "thank you" for helping everyone flow without problems. Drivers with this attitude will never learn how nice it is to feel you've helped someone out with just a two second time delay to your day.
@@RogeyRD250DX This Richard (or shall we call him Dick for short?) didn't even need to come to a stop, he just needed to ease off a bit and let the Skoda come past. Some drivers seem to unwilling to make adjustments to their speed to allow things to flow better.
Actually he didn’t ignore rule 163, which is about overtaking vehicles and leaving enough space. You were in the wrong for not giving way to him as he had priority.
3:03 onwards. Right we appear to have a rather inexperienced driver who doesn't seem to understand why things are happening and the route cause of the issue. Well firstly if you are not overtaking you should be in the left lane, I know the solid lane is marking the hard shoulder but it seems to be in a roadworks section. You might be sat there filming thinking you are at the posted 50mph limit, unfortunately a car speedo can be highly inaccurate, whereas a lorry's tachograph has to be checked every two years for accuracy and every six it has to be re-calibrated. I had the chance to put my 5 year old pickup on a local rolling road, the result was 45.6 mph with 50mph showing on the clock. So in order to be at 50mph it has to be showing around 55mph on the clock. We see this everyday in these sections so Djack is not alone in his misunderstanding. I hope that helps. P.S If you are undertaken by a HGV in these circumstances and the HGV undertakes safely and can prove he has not gone above the speed limit, easily done with the tachograph, the Police have been advised to not prosecute the lorry driver. This advice was circulated to all force areas more than five years ago. The vehicle that has been undertaken is more likely to be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention. Thank you for reading but I suppose it will still happen again tomorrow. Drive safe everyone.
@@MonkishMite09 Oh wow mate, thank you so much for that. I won't bore you with a long acceptance speech, I'd just like to thank..........Seriously though Thank you. All the best.
djack 3:02, you are lane hogging. If an artic can pass you on the inside, you are in the wrong lane! It doesn't matter if you are doing '50', move left. The lorries aren't allowed in lane 3, so you are in the way. Plus, their speedo is more accurate than yours!
Lane one is bordered by a solid white line has has a different destination to lanes 2 and 3, not lane hogging at all, and you do know that you can not cross a solid white line?
@@RichardDavies-tn2ug You've got it the wrong way round, they over-read by law, up to 10%, it's illegal to have a speedometer that says you're going slower than you actually are. So if your speedometer says 50, you could be going as slow as 45, and it's highly like that the HGV's had it's speedometer recalibrated, or are using a GPS for their actual speed.
At 1:43 why the hell did you stop well in advance of the T-Junction? By you not covering the junction to turn right, you gave the other driver the illusion that you were giving way to them and helped to put the cyclist's life in danger! Were you going to be a corner cutter at the T-Junction?
Look how one driver ,with a deluded perception of the Highway Code ,causes SO much delay for 4 or 5 other drivers PLUS himself and however many other cars were behind Dickhard.
I know Richard was bad, but can we please make sure that the self important muppet (that’s the nicest phrase I could choose) at 3:30 knows what a completely incompetent tool he is? You are lane hogging. It’s not for you to decide the speed others travel at, if they want to go 2-5mph quicker than you THEY CAN. KEEP LEFT, unless overtaking, and mind your own business. YOU created an unnecessarily dangerous situation and deluded yourself into thinking you were in the right.
05:45..... The on coming car was well committed and almost clear of the traffic when you decided to still progress and then prevent both of you from progress, should have simply slowed down when you seen the car and accept the few seconds of delay rather than standing your ground and causing more delay and probably getting angry in the process 👍
He is in the left lane, right lane is blocked off due to road works and the lane to the left I assume is a Junction lane, or something. As it has a Solid White line and not dotted.
Richard, I really cannot see the problem with the Skoda. You had plenty of room to stop and let him through. A manoeuvre they had already started. After all your waffle about ignorance and arrogance you then push your way through at the other side!!!!
At 1:42, OK he should not have pulled out with the bike coming but really you should not have stopped to let him out because that gave him the wrong impression that it was clear, I am not blaming you but it is not always right to be willing to help.
@@garyboyle695so even when someone’s committed to an overtake, or to park… you are saying they need to go all the way back regardless that the Highway Code states you must give way to vehicles that have already committed?? on your side,
Mmm, not sure everyone was in the wrong here, the driver on the motorway with 2 trucks was clearly in the wrong, driving too slowly holding those trucks up, the guy with oncoming Skoda, in my opinion they were committed to their manoeuvre before the "cammer" appeared, since covid lockdown's the general standard of driving in the UK has deteriorated considerably, very few people give way,courtesy & good manners are almost non existent these days, most drivers are focused on one thing, getting to their destination, having said all that, I still think driving standards in the UK is better than most other Western countries, has anybody driven in Portugal or the USA,recently, they are seriously scary, particularly Portugal-there they think nothing of the driving laws🤔👍
At 5:40, the cammer is also a bad driver and probably should shoulder most of the blame for the standof. He has a terrible mindset, of "it's my right of way", but there's no such thing: there's only Priority, which is given, not taken. He has decided that because his side of the road has no parked cars and the other side has, it's his "right of way". Wrong. The rule is that you should not enter a restricted portion of the carriageway if you are going to cause an obstruction, and that is exactly what Richard does. It's not only a rule, but it's also simple common sense. He can see the other vehicle entering the restricted portion from a long way off, long before he enters the restricted portion himself. He's either not paying attention, or he prefers to deliberately cause conflict to create content. He writes about having to "slam on the brakes", which he didn't: it looks like he accelerates into the restriction, whereas he could probably have a allowed the other car to clear by just easing off the gas if he'd reacted correctly when first seeing it. In the end, he just ends up looking like an idiot.
The trucks are flashing their lights to get you to move out of the overtaking lane you are hogging. The HC is clear that if you are not overtaking, move to the left. And as there are roadworks, the hard shoulder is the left lane.
3.33 what you should do is be in the left lane. Your supposed to gain on the vehicle infront then move to overtake not sit there. You have time to sit smiling and fiddling with your camera and seem happy that you’re causing congestion . If I was one of your passengers I certainly wouldn’t be sat smiling with a 44t vehicle flashing and beeping ide be saying move the f*ck over to that left lane while we are overtaking fresh air and get out his way!
Poor driving at 5.40. If you pause you can see how the camera car had plenty of time and space to see what was developing. No reduction in speed. Yes there may be some rule, however that does not over rule common sense. This could have been avoided by a reduction in speed, allowing the oncoming car to pass the obstruction. Allowing this situation to develop was a greater error than the claimed mistake of the other vehicle.
If you're driving slower and hogging lane 2 there's bound to be trucks slowly and carefully undertaking you, and flashing you to get out of lane 2! Ps - you don't have priority on the road when narrow/parked cars UNLESS you see a priority over oncoming vehicles sign. If someone is already passing parked cars YOU should wait for them to finish. It's just one of those things, yes it's annoying but sometimes you just have to wait for a gap, whichever side the parked cars are on!
5:40 Perfect example of where you should make it a non issue. Whether the approaching driver should have pulled in or not is irrelevant, people make mistakes, it happens. Just pull in and let them through and you'll be far less delayed than you were. You both created the problem and you both made it worse.
East Lancs Dashcam: You were saying about the Red light jumper but the driver in the car said it doesn't matter as their car is RED. Red lights don't apply! 😂😂
3:44 Look at him enjoying himself, what an idiot. If you’re going to stick to the speed limit, then just drive on the left instead of hindering other traffic
@3.05...That's exactly what happened to me a few week ago on the M1 in the 50mph roadworks in the midlands & an HGV tailgated me flashing his lights then he undertook me & swerved his truck to chop my front end off ! Had to react & brake or he would have hit me & caused a multiple pile up !
At 5m42s it says that Rule 163 of the Highway Code has been disobeyed. Not it isn't because that refers to passing cyclists and the distance to clear them. The cammer should have given way to the oncoming vehicle as they were passing the cars that were parked on their side of the road and had got there first. This is rule tat so many don't understand, if someone gets there first, even if you think you have priority, you MUST let them through or this situation will arise or worse a head on collision because of the intransigence of the cammer.
At 5:40 the oncoming car can see Richard. He then still has time to pull over into the gap to let Richard pass. He was not 2 cars in when he was able to see Richard. All of you are absolutely terrible drivers and Richard is actually 100% in his right. Coming down the road, not even trying to pull into the gap and trying to beat traffic that has the right of way? Well done Richard for showing other people that even bullying on the road is not ok. And if the Skoda driver didn't do it on purpose, he has terrible forward planning. Either way, Skoda is 100% the worst driver between him and the cammer.
@davem9204 lmfao, I don't even live in the UK. But at least the people in the comments prove why there are so many dashcam compilations about UK drivers. You are all terrible drivers, it's painful to see and read..
The driver who was recording in the second to last clip should have given way as the other driver was already committed in their munouver. On top of that, the oncoming vehicle was negotiating a summit and a bend in the road, as well as watching for pedestrians that may come from between the parked vehicles. There were also other vehicles behind them which were un seen by the camera and driver which made the camera car mount the pavement. This is my opinion. A retired MOD driving instructor.
You were wrong Richard. The other driver was unable to stop in time before seeing you. Then you take a hissy fit and make him reverse when cars are behind him. You had plenty of time to let him through.
video 5:39 - car coming onwards already passed a few cars. All the cam car had to do was put his foot on the break before the start of the parked cars. What an idiot. You can see how far the parked cars go and a second car is now up there on his side. Reverse back and let the good people by
4:08 If you drive in a place with single track roads with passing places drive a t least a passing place distance apart. Worse if you are driving a long vehicle or towing there is nowhere a second car can go.
Far too many 'Garys'. Arrogant, impatient and will then act tho they are wronged when the contact happens. Red light jumping and veering diagonly across 2 lanes of traffic to hit the m-way junction rather than slow down by 10 mph and get in the filter lane in time. Gary also likes to drive 20 mph over the speed imit and make you feel you are going to slow. Gary also like to use his fullbeam regardless of if there is street lighting. However this does save your lights, you can turn yours off.Gary can be found driving a varity of cars, no longer the 'this model' stereotype, Gary can be found driving range rovers tesla and minis. Gary also can't be without looking at the phone for for longer than 30 seconds, so in an emergancy, will still look to see what is happening on screen. This is why the Gary sits in lane 2 at 50mph on motorways. Please record and report Gary for dangerous driving, so we can rid the road of this menace.
5.40 Cammer needs to take a retest. If there is a restriction on the road ahead of you, you only have the right of way if your way ahead is clear. If someone else is already committed to coming through the restriction - even if they are on your side of the road - then they have priority over you, and you should wait and not be a twat.
90% of truck drivers, speed tailgate and push you into another lane whenever they feel like it, they know they're not going to get done there's not enough police about.
I don't think I've ever experienced a truck driver tailgating me in over 30 years of driving. I do like to keep up a decent speed and keep left unless overtaking though, so maybe there's a coincidence there?
DJack, you were lane hogging. That's probably why the trucks were annoyed. And it annoys me to watch it - you could easily have used the left lane (Lane 1).
Honestly if lorries/trucks or any haulage vehicles wants to do more than the speed limit like a 50 or 60 then let them. You’ll overtake them at 70 then you can have the laughs.
3.58 Car is sitting in middle lane, nothing ahead of them, whilst making little or no progress to overtake vehicle in Lane 1. Just move over and stop trying to be the self appointed Traffic Police.
Djack turns the camera around to show us his smug face…. lol. This will be on the internet forever of you being soooo wrong, and your desire to lane hog AND THEN POSTING IT FOR ALL TO SEE! Quite unbelievable 😂
So many tw@ts on this channel. The clip at 3.05, why are you just sat in the middle lane, the clip at 5.40, he has right of way as he's coming through therefore you should have waited, you may want to read the highway code, I didn't watch the rest as it just frustrates me
I know what you mean about been frustrated by some of these camera vehicles, so at least I hope my clip re-establishes a sort of balance here. All the best Robert.
@@MrSabretooth19 Was just about to say the same. I show videos of us having to go down unsuitable for HGV roads to get to farms, because strangely, they are in the countryside. All the best.
This is a spiral roundabout and there are two lanes that exit to the right. There is also another roundabout right after this one so they may be preparing to turn left at the next roundabout. This roundabout is a nightmare since its pushing traffic on the roundabout towards traffic entering and I have had a few people pull out on me despite me indicating right.
5:40 Richard.
Put up all the argument you like (HWC, being a bully) the skoda is already past 3 cars before you get to the first one, I think it's safe to say they have priority. Your the bully here.
Absolutely 100% correct, nowt but aggressive driving by the cam driver who has zero patience & zero driving skills.
💯%
Then after he gets round the Skoda he mounts curb and bullys the white Audi out of his was doing the exact thing he was complaining about.
And they have right of way because they saw the oncoming vehicle and still committed to blocking the opposing vehicle's side of the road? Sorry if they had no vision of oncoming vehicle, I'd have agreed with you. But when ones own side of the road is obstructed you must give way to vehicles coming the opposite direction, when their side is not blocked!
@@neilmartin5345
At that point there was probably cars behind him, possibly still blocking the opposing vehicle's exit of narrowed road. If he'd have stopped, it would have been a stalemate/gridlock situation. The car moved voluntary as he slowed. I didn't see and bullying at that point!
I wonder if you'd have held your ground, instead of letting the stream of cars clear the narrowed part of the road?
Where was he meant to go Richard? He was passing the parked cars before you got to them. Plus why didn't you wait further up the road whern the parked car was on your side. You're the mug here. Also rule 163 provides guidance on overtaking other road users not about passing parked vehicles.
He was meant to go into the space before the parked cars, the one he did eventually go into. If the obstruction is on your side of the road you give priority to oncoming vehicles. It's not as if he couldn't see Richard approaching.
Rule 163 states "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road" So yes it does provide guidance on "passing parked vehicles".
Despite the other motorist clearly being in the wrong Richard could have avoided conflict here by just letting the other motorist bully their way through.
@@roaduser6438Why give in to bullies? Stand up to them or they will continue to get away with it.
@@alanclarke4646 Correct, absolutely correct.
@@Liverpool-s5n wrong, he'd already committed and was past 2 cars before cammer even reached the first. Cammer just wanted a clip and caused conflict for no reason.
let alone his horrible driving, he really sent in the clip thinking the other driver was in the wrong
6:02 Another ignorant and aggressive driver? Assuming Richard is speaking about himself here? The oncoming car was already committed before you even approached and were visible to him. Perhaps you should review said Highway Code Rule 163, or perhaps just driving standards in general before trying to blame someone for your error.
My thoughts exactly. Obviously too hard to stop let the committed car come through and go on your way. Rather than create a scene
05:40 the car coming down the road has commited and the cammer should slow to a sensible speed to allow the vehicle to pass thus enabling EVERYONE to get on with their lives !
05:50 ignoring the rules didnt apply here until the cammer blocked the other car completly ( 163 - give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road )
@@Hu5ky This is for the Skoda, not the cam car. If the cam car was already there the Skoda would've had to wait for him to pass. But, the Skoda was there first, before the cam car. So had priority. Because when he began passing the parked vehicles on his side of the road the cam car wasn't there. Cam car on arriving should have let the Skoda pass, seeing as he was already committed, as others have said. Cam car in the wrong, not the Skoda.
It looked not obvious at all that the Skoda driver had seen Richard. They were from a slight bend and emerging from a dip. Meanwhile- Richard WAS acting like a dip !
3:50 - Go behind the HGV in lane 1 then you muppet. HGV's aren't allow in lane 3, you're hogging their overtaking lane. Here's a quick reminder for you, your speedometer can be up to 10% over your actual speed. You think you're doing 50, you might be doing 45, and that's why you're pissing them off with your lane hogging.
and cross a solid white line?
@@georgebarnes8163 That's a smart motorway hard shoulder. You're allowed to cross it when the gantry permits, which is likely the case due to roadworks in the far right lane.
@@georgebarnes8163 George the Muppet is here. If you don't know this basic rule, DO NOT DRIVE.
I think you will find speedos a lot more accurate nowadays especially digital ones, forget the 10% thing that was for cars from the 70s and 80s.
@ No. if you look at your car speedometer it’s always 7/10% less than the actual speed.
It’s because car speedometer should NEVER show less than the actual speed, they are always calibrated at 110% by automakers.
Unlike the GPS speedometer. I don’t think it has changed over the year.
Richard, you are a terrible driver. Someone was already commited, and you had the room to just stop and let the road flow. Instead, you chose to just carry on like a stubborn buffoon, block up the road for everyone, and even delay yourself as well. There's just no need for that behaviour.
They committed when they knew a car was approaching, so should not have committed in the first place
@@Liverpool-s5n they didn't know ahahah, it was on a corner and hill, gr was committed before he had s chance to react
This channel should be renamed "Entitled cammers prove how they are wrong"
3:24 the reason 2 hgvs were flashing you behind and one undertook you was because you were middle lane hogging and completely unaware of it 👍🏻
lane 1 has a different destination to lanes 2 and 3 and is bordered by a solid white line. Not lane hogging at all.
there was no lane hogging lol
@@georgebarnes8163 Roadworks and hard shoulder running
but it's 50mph... WELL DO THAT IN LANE 1 AND NOT LANE 2 YOU PRICK! If significantly slower vehicles are undertaking then you are the problem PSA you can drive at 55mph in a 50 average speed check and not 'done'!
@@georgebarnes8163 It's a smart motorway where you can switch lane even if it's a solid white line... defending a lane hogger as usual. It's the exact same destination.
Richard review channel You need to retake your driving test or look in the highway code, the car that you blocked LA 68 NFL had right of way because they were already committed and was almost through the gap when you drove up aggressively when you should of stopped and let them go, the MORONS on the roads of today made me stop driving
i am 52 and am considering packing the driving up once my present car becomes obsolete...too dangerous now..
The driver coming down the hill could easily have waited at the top and should have before coming down as their side was blocked and they could clearly see the cam car coming who actually had priority but they still chose to come down anyway. There was no real " aggressive driving" and if that is the way you think then it's a good job you did give up.
@@underwaterbubbles Are you serious? The "Cammer" was way back and it was obvious to anybody to let the car coming down come through first. Who taught you to drive or have you not got a licence? Stick to Farting in the Bath with a stupid name like that.
I just re-watched and was about to say the same. Cammer was very wrong.
@@doctorsocrates4413 I am 70 a car cut me up on a roundabout i honked he jammed on in front of me, he got out and said i might of known it would be an old twat who cant keep up with the speed limit, the speed limit was 40 he was doing at least 60 , he did not look british, this was Bradford where you need a crash helmet in a car.
5:42, the Skoda was well committed with no option to dive into a gap when you appeared in his sight, demanding priority. THIS is where you lift off and give him a decent chance to get out of the way. But you just had to play the "Me first; back up, loser" card. YOU are the arrogant bully, here.
And he wasn't even first either Mike. All the best.
Please rewatch the video. You'll see that Richard would have been visible before the skoda was passing that row of cars. He should have simply pulled into the gap (the one he eventually reversed back into) as rule 163 of the highway code tells him to, "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road".
Seeing as the Skoda driver was bullying their way through Richard should have diffused the situation though and given way.
@@roaduser6438 Hello there when driving you have to deal with changing situations on the road all the time, including other drivers who either don't do the correct thing or do something which you weren't expecting. A good driver should be able to adjust their driving to take account of these drivers, lets face it they are everywhere, but in this instance instead of simply letting the car come by and tut tutting at him or throwing him a dirty look, Richard chose to create a situation that ended up making him look like an inexperienced amateur. He would have gained more kudos with the general public with a video pointing out "look at this idiot and how I managed to make it a non issue." Thank you for making your point with a reasoned and an objective view. All the best.
Actually the Skoda can see Richard at 5:40, when he had time to go into the gap. Seems to me the driver of the Skoda has terrible forward planning and was rightfully sent back to the gap.
@MazTheWizard You're entitled to your view, but I'd disagree with you on that point. There's an awful lot of others who appear to disagree with your assessment, too. All I will say is that I have no time for priority thieves, but would never have done what Richard did there.
Richard head sending a clip in of him acting aggressively and appallingly and then goes all passive aggressive playing the victim. 🤡🤡🤡
The clip that starts at 5:39 - you should have let him clear before you moved forward.
was just going to post the same - the Skoda was already committed to passing the parked cars - cammer should have stopped and let the Skoda through
Agreed, I was gonna say the same
Came to say the same thing, if there is a constant obstruction, like this, parked cars in a row, whoever commits has priority. Mr Richard's Review Channel need to revise the Highway Code. Oh, and then the irony at the end, he has to get past a parked Merc and forces the white Audi over! Richard = COTW!
Definitely not, if other drives keep making allowances for his crap driving, he will continue to drive like that and probably get worse. Good for you Richard.
@@garyboyle695 Richard clearly in the wrong. he is lucky it wasn't me he tried to intimidate. 🤕🤕🤕
05:40 Richard I bet ya wish ya never sent your clip in, ya made yourself look stupid pal
🤣🤣🤣🤣
1:45 - this is what happens when you don't drive to the rules of the road, the car coming from the left had give way markings, meaning they give way to you which is what they are doing. If you had driven past like he was expecting it wouldn't have caused any delay for that Golf and would have prevented this confusion of someone driving otherwise in accordance to the highway code and then forcing them to make a decision that they shouldn't have to make. I know you were trying to be helpful but its people like you that flash someone out whilst there's still traffic flowing on the other side of the road and cause an accident.
he was turning right and giving way to the cyclist, he did hold back a bit to far imo which lead to the golf being confused
The driver of the Skoda was already in the obstruction and by the looks there was time to give way to let the Skoda through
5:40. I think the Camer, should read all of Rule 163, as it also states that if a driver is committed, as in this clip, you should allow them to complete the manoeuvre. Also if both vehicles are committed (which the camer wasn’t) the driver who has the shortest and safest distance to reverse, should do so (which the camer had).
1:42 You caused that.
5:40. If I'd have been the driver of the car coming down the hill I would have just switched the engine off and sat there. The cammer knows nothing about the highway code and is just an ignorant bully in his car.
Is the skoda driver, who should have been able to see Richard approaching, also a bully? After all he shouldn't have started passing those parked cars according to the highway code. So why did he?
"give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road"
@@roaduser6438 I can't agree with you. The cammer was nowhere near the parked cars when the other car started to pass the parked cars. The rule also says if the oncoming car has commenced the overtake you are expected to give way, which is what happened. It also says that if both are committed the one that the one with the least inconvenience should reverse. This should be the one with the shortest distance to reverse. As the cammer hadn't even got passed two cars it should have been him that reversed. As a road user I thought you would know exactly what the highway code said.
@@MultiDoctordeath "I can't agree with you" That's fine but I'm happy that the highway code does. "give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road". The skoda driver failed to do this. You can see that right? Getting there first has absolutely nothing to do with what the skoda driver should have done. I agree that once the skoda driver failed in his obligations the cammer should have given way.
"This should be the one with the shortest distance to reverse" incorrect. You got it right first time. "the one with the least inconvenience should reverse". Having vehicles close behind you, or towing a trailer, or operating a large vehicle may make it more convenient for the one with the longer distance to reverse.
@@roaduser6438 I agree with you about whether there are cars behind but there is nothing in this clip to know whether there are vehicles behind the cammer. I'm glad you finally agree that the cammer should have given way. I'm sure many drivers would have done what the other driver did in the same situation. As I said if this had happened to me, which isn't likely as I always give way, unlike most drivers these days, I would have switched the engine off and just sat there.
@@MultiDoctordeath "I'm glad you finally agree" I never said otherwise, so you're wrong, I don't "finally agree" I've agreed all along.
"I always give way" "I would have switched the engine off and just sat there" So you wouldn't always give way?
In this situation the cammer thinks he's in the right because the Skoda should have ceded priority. And if the Skoda driver thinks he's in the right because the cammer should have ceded priority once the skoda was committed, you would have two juveniles sat there, with their engines off, blocking the whole road if they had your attitude.
At no point whilst driving would I choose to purposefully be part of a road blockage in order to protect a fragile ego just because I believe I'm in the right. Point and laugh at them, be part of the solution and let everyone get on with their day.
Richard, when you quote rules please also check the section on commitment,, if you've already started your overtake,oncoming traffic should give way. Learn the rules before mouthing about others
5:39 is the I've a dash camera im always right driver. Skoda was almost to the end and you just kept going.
Good. Maybe next time he won't try and force his way through. He could obviously see the other car approaching and should have stopped. But no, like you he's an entitled driver who thinks the rules don't apply to them.
Unlikely this Richard chappy was clearly visible to that approaching car. But even if so, why would anyone with any sense continue on to a confrontation. IF the Skoda ,or whatever it was driver had made a little mistake, the chances are they would've realised it and been gratefull for the Richard bloke to just ease off and stop if necessary to allow them through. Richard would've probably got a hand up and a curtious "thank you" for helping everyone flow without problems. Drivers with this attitude will never learn how nice it is to feel you've helped someone out with just a two second time delay to your day.
@@RogeyRD250DX This Richard (or shall we call him Dick for short?) didn't even need to come to a stop, he just needed to ease off a bit and let the Skoda come past. Some drivers seem to unwilling to make adjustments to their speed to allow things to flow better.
Oh Richard. Is your second name Head by any chance?
Actually he didn’t ignore rule 163, which is about overtaking vehicles and leaving enough space. You were in the wrong for not giving way to him as he had priority.
3:03 onwards. Right we appear to have a rather inexperienced driver who doesn't seem to understand why things are happening and the route cause of the issue. Well firstly if you are not overtaking you should be in the left lane, I know the solid lane is marking the hard shoulder but it seems to be in a roadworks section. You might be sat there filming thinking you are at the posted 50mph limit, unfortunately a car speedo can be highly inaccurate, whereas a lorry's tachograph has to be checked every two years for accuracy and every six it has to be re-calibrated. I had the chance to put my 5 year old pickup on a local rolling road, the result was 45.6 mph with 50mph showing on the clock. So in order to be at 50mph it has to be showing around 55mph on the clock. We see this everyday in these sections so Djack is not alone in his misunderstanding. I hope that helps. P.S If you are undertaken by a HGV in these circumstances and the HGV undertakes safely and can prove he has not gone above the speed limit, easily done with the tachograph, the Police have been advised to not prosecute the lorry driver. This advice was circulated to all force areas more than five years ago. The vehicle that has been undertaken is more likely to be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention. Thank you for reading but I suppose it will still happen again tomorrow. Drive safe everyone.
The best comment under this video award goes to you my friend, finally someone else that actually understands this 🎉🎉😂😂
@@MonkishMite09 Oh wow mate, thank you so much for that. I won't bore you with a long acceptance speech, I'd just like to thank..........Seriously though Thank you. All the best.
Great comment and whilst I knew most of this, I have learnt something today, thank you
Spofforth Skoda, committed to pass as you arrived. YOU WAIT, or you create content.
There are drivers and there are steering wheel attendants.
3:24 can the cammer please supply the details of the booking site he used to rent that middle lane for the day please.
3:45 Brave of you to show the face of a lane-hogging fool. Just move to the left!
Richard, Richard, Richard... you are wrong, wrong, wrong.
I bet he gets called Dick all the time
djack 3:02, you are lane hogging. If an artic can pass you on the inside, you are in the wrong lane! It doesn't matter if you are doing '50', move left. The lorries aren't allowed in lane 3, so you are in the way. Plus, their speedo is more accurate than yours!
Lane one is bordered by a solid white line has has a different destination to lanes 2 and 3, not lane hogging at all, and you do know that you can not cross a solid white line?
@@georgebarnes8163no it doesn't the contraflow has been removed for the works to keep 3 lanes.
Too many people think I'm doing 50 on my speedo, that's good enough.... Speedo's under read BY LAW so you can go faster and still keep to 50 MPH.
@@georgebarnes8163 In the case of roadworks, or a smart motorway when directed you can. It acts as a normal lane.
@@RichardDavies-tn2ug You've got it the wrong way round, they over-read by law, up to 10%, it's illegal to have a speedometer that says you're going slower than you actually are.
So if your speedometer says 50, you could be going as slow as 45, and it's highly like that the HGV's had it's speedometer recalibrated, or are using a GPS for their actual speed.
Multiple lorries are undertaking and tailgating me, I wonder why? 🤔
At 1:43 why the hell did you stop well in advance of the T-Junction? By you not covering the junction to turn right, you gave the other driver the illusion that you were giving way to them and helped to put the cyclist's life in danger! Were you going to be a corner cutter at the T-Junction?
My thoughts too. The cammer's action invited the car out of the junction into the path of the cyclist.
@davem9204 thank you for your comment! At least there is two of us that saw the same thing!! The cammer's actions made no sense?
The E&M Rogers incident the cammer car hogging the middle as per normal 🤡
Look how one driver ,with a deluded perception of the Highway Code ,causes SO much delay for 4 or 5 other drivers PLUS himself and however many other cars were behind Dickhard.
I know Richard was bad, but can we please make sure that the self important muppet (that’s the nicest phrase I could choose) at 3:30 knows what a completely incompetent tool he is? You are lane hogging. It’s not for you to decide the speed others travel at, if they want to go 2-5mph quicker than you THEY CAN.
KEEP LEFT, unless overtaking, and mind your own business.
YOU created an unnecessarily dangerous situation and deluded yourself into thinking you were in the right.
This is the comment I've been looking for!!! You are lane hogging and it is illegal, get out of the way!!!😂😂
05:45..... The on coming car was well committed and almost clear of the traffic when you decided to still progress and then prevent both of you from progress, should have simply slowed down when you seen the car and accept the few seconds of delay rather than standing your ground and causing more delay and probably getting angry in the process 👍
5:41 All on you, Richard. Please take the bus next time.
djack stop sitting in the middle lane not overtaking anyone
He is in the left lane, right lane is blocked off due to road works and the lane to the left I assume is a Junction lane, or something. As it has a Solid White line and not dotted.
@CheesusTheGreat looks like the hard shoulder is in use as a normal lane, like a smart motorway
Richard, I really cannot see the problem with the Skoda. You had plenty of room to stop and let him through. A manoeuvre they had already started. After all your waffle about ignorance and arrogance you then push your way through at the other side!!!!
Djack you are a nob just hogging middle lane that’s why hgv undercut you get in slow lane and stay there
At 1:42, OK he should not have pulled out with the bike coming but really you should not have stopped to let him out because that gave him the wrong impression that it was clear, I am not blaming you but it is not always right to be willing to help.
Hello there mate, well you've done it again the comments are alive with opinions! Good one, thank you for using mine. All the best.
Richard, you're the problem here, Son.
He's an asshat
No he's not, it's people like you that are the problem. As he said in his video, the other car could see him but carried on regardless.
@@garyboyle695 PLUS< he's a "Cammer" so he can't be wrong!! A bloody twerp, but I say again, he can't be wrong, can he!!
@@garyboyle695 I think you should seek out Richard, and arrange to accompany him on a driver awareness course.
@@garyboyle695so even when someone’s committed to an overtake, or to park… you are saying they need to go all the way back regardless that the Highway Code states you must give way to vehicles that have already committed?? on your side,
Mmm, not sure everyone was in the wrong here, the driver on the motorway with 2 trucks was clearly in the wrong, driving too slowly holding those trucks up, the guy with oncoming Skoda, in my opinion they were committed to their manoeuvre before the "cammer" appeared, since covid lockdown's the general standard of driving in the UK has deteriorated considerably, very few people give way,courtesy & good manners are almost non existent these days, most drivers are focused on one thing, getting to their destination, having said all that, I still think driving standards in the UK is better than most other Western countries, has anybody driven in Portugal or the USA,recently, they are seriously scary, particularly Portugal-there they think nothing of the driving laws🤔👍
mate I tend to agree with you
Well put indeed, good one @geetee.
At 5:40, the cammer is also a bad driver and probably should shoulder most of the blame for the standof. He has a terrible mindset, of "it's my right of way", but there's no such thing: there's only Priority, which is given, not taken. He has decided that because his side of the road has no parked cars and the other side has, it's his "right of way". Wrong. The rule is that you should not enter a restricted portion of the carriageway if you are going to cause an obstruction, and that is exactly what Richard does. It's not only a rule, but it's also simple common sense. He can see the other vehicle entering the restricted portion from a long way off, long before he enters the restricted portion himself. He's either not paying attention, or he prefers to deliberately cause conflict to create content. He writes about having to "slam on the brakes", which he didn't: it looks like he accelerates into the restriction, whereas he could probably have a allowed the other car to clear by just easing off the gas if he'd reacted correctly when first seeing it. In the end, he just ends up looking like an idiot.
The trucks are flashing their lights to get you to move out of the overtaking lane you are hogging.
The HC is clear that if you are not overtaking, move to the left. And as there are roadworks, the hard shoulder is the left lane.
Richard. U had plenty of time to scan the road ahead and stop. Ln68 all ready started the manoeuvre. He had right to finish it
3.33 what you should do is be in the left lane. Your supposed to gain on the vehicle infront then move to overtake not sit there. You have time to sit smiling and fiddling with your camera and seem happy that you’re causing congestion . If I was one of your passengers I certainly wouldn’t be sat smiling with a 44t vehicle flashing and beeping ide be saying move the f*ck over to that left lane while we are overtaking fresh air and get out his way!
Poor driving at 5.40. If you pause you can see how the camera car had plenty of time and space to see what was developing. No reduction in speed. Yes there may be some rule, however that does not over rule common sense. This could have been avoided by a reduction in speed, allowing the oncoming car to pass the obstruction. Allowing this situation to develop was a greater error than the claimed mistake of the other vehicle.
6:39 Then you should be waiting too, if you’re so fond of the rules, Mr. with the insight of a homing pigeon
3:50 you are 100% in the wrong here. Learn the rules and common courtesy my god
I love the "road captains" that sit in lane 2, NOT overtaking and complain about people flashing them to move over!
I hope the cammers are reporting all these serious incidents to the Police? 🚓
Richard lad cmon he was meters away from getting through but you kept tryna bully your way
Good respectable driving from the HGV, cloudmaker. Unfortunately, you get the odd fool that won't wait until it's safe to pass.
Hey there, thank you very much for that, it is much appreciated. All the best.
Agreed. Was glad to see this comment. Considerate driving should be highlighted as, unfortunately, it isn't so common these days.
@@bustestlucloc4630 Thank you, although I do tell folks that it's just clever editing that makes me a half decent driver! All the best.
5:50 - they were already taking the lane because when they entered, you weren't there. Bellend behaviour from the cammer.
If you're driving slower and hogging lane 2 there's bound to be trucks slowly and carefully undertaking you, and flashing you to get out of lane 2!
Ps - you don't have priority on the road when narrow/parked cars UNLESS you see a priority over oncoming vehicles sign. If someone is already passing parked cars YOU should wait for them to finish. It's just one of those things, yes it's annoying but sometimes you just have to wait for a gap, whichever side the parked cars are on!
5:40 Perfect example of where you should make it a non issue. Whether the approaching driver should have pulled in or not is irrelevant, people make mistakes, it happens. Just pull in and let them through and you'll be far less delayed than you were. You both created the problem and you both made it worse.
And look at how much traffic he created (and number of people inconvenienced) just to (wrongly) prove his (wrong) point.
Red cars are allowed to go through red lights 🚦🚦🚥
Same colour as a fire-engine, so thought he had to drive like one! 😂
East Lancs Dashcam: You were saying about the Red light jumper but the driver in the car said it doesn't matter as their car is RED. Red lights don't apply! 😂😂
Hey Richard betcha kinda feeling silly about now!
Richard is a little self entitled there methinks
3:44 Look at him enjoying himself, what an idiot. If you’re going to stick to the speed limit, then just drive on the left instead of hindering other traffic
@3.05...That's exactly what happened to me a few week ago on the M1 in the 50mph roadworks in the midlands & an HGV tailgated me flashing his lights then he undertook me & swerved his truck to chop my front end off ! Had to react & brake or he would have hit me & caused a multiple pile up !
Dash Camers fault at 5:40, the oncoming vehicle was already alongside the parked cars and dash camer needed to give way!
At 5m42s it says that Rule 163 of the Highway Code has been disobeyed. Not it isn't because that refers to passing cyclists and the distance to clear them. The cammer should have given way to the oncoming vehicle as they were passing the cars that were parked on their side of the road and had got there first. This is rule tat so many don't understand, if someone gets there first, even if you think you have priority, you MUST let them through or this situation will arise or worse a head on collision because of the intransigence of the cammer.
Car coming down hill already has right of way cam car driver is an idiot
4:52 why is there always an idiot in a Chelsea tractor
At 5:40 the oncoming car can see Richard. He then still has time to pull over into the gap to let Richard pass. He was not 2 cars in when he was able to see Richard. All of you are absolutely terrible drivers and Richard is actually 100% in his right. Coming down the road, not even trying to pull into the gap and trying to beat traffic that has the right of way? Well done Richard for showing other people that even bullying on the road is not ok. And if the Skoda driver didn't do it on purpose, he has terrible forward planning. Either way, Skoda is 100% the worst driver between him and the cammer.
Thanks for the comment Richard :)
@davem9204 lmfao, I don't even live in the UK. But at least the people in the comments prove why there are so many dashcam compilations about UK drivers. You are all terrible drivers, it's painful to see and read..
The driver who was recording in the second to last clip should have given way as the other driver was already committed in their munouver.
On top of that, the oncoming vehicle was negotiating a summit and a bend in the road, as well as watching for pedestrians that may come from between the parked vehicles. There were also other vehicles behind them which were un seen by the camera and driver which made the camera car mount the pavement.
This is my opinion. A retired MOD driving instructor.
Greetings Everyone 👍🏻😎
The red car, where did they think the lorry behind them was going to go, you have the right of way.
You were wrong Richard. The other driver was unable to stop in time before seeing you. Then you take a hissy fit and make him reverse when cars are behind him. You had plenty of time to let him through.
0:35 they don't call, they don't write..
That sounds like a disappointing date ❤
This made me laugh xD
Safe to say from the comments this episode is called “Richard you plum!!”
0:26 More obtusely than acutely.😆
I blame spell check! haha
video 5:39 - car coming onwards already passed a few cars. All the cam car had to do was put his foot on the break before the start of the parked cars. What an idiot. You can see how far the parked cars go and a second car is now up there on his side. Reverse back and let the good people by
4:53 Don't give the knobjockey in the Range Rover the time of day, get closer, make him/her move back, ez
4:08 If you drive in a place with single track roads with passing places drive a t least a passing place distance apart. Worse if you are driving a long vehicle or towing there is nowhere a second car can go.
0:45 look at the stupid cow grinning.
She knows what shes done. At least no one was hurt.
Far too many 'Garys'. Arrogant, impatient and will then act tho they are wronged when the contact happens. Red light jumping and veering diagonly across 2 lanes of traffic to hit the m-way junction rather than slow down by 10 mph and get in the filter lane in time. Gary also likes to drive 20 mph over the speed imit and make you feel you are going to slow. Gary also like to use his fullbeam regardless of if there is street lighting. However this does save your lights, you can turn yours off.Gary can be found driving a varity of cars, no longer the 'this model' stereotype, Gary can be found driving range rovers tesla and minis. Gary also can't be without looking at the phone for for longer than 30 seconds, so in an emergancy, will still look to see what is happening on screen. This is why the Gary sits in lane 2 at 50mph on motorways. Please record and report Gary for dangerous driving, so we can rid the road of this menace.
We need a 'stop the Garys' awarenes program
3:41 "stick to the rules" which rule says sit in the middle lane for miles with traffic passing you on both sides then?
Actually* 0: 0:26
Oh no, I thought it was wrong when I was editing it! flipping spell check. haha
5.40 Cammer needs to take a retest. If there is a restriction on the road ahead of you, you only have the right of way if your way ahead is clear.
If someone else is already committed to coming through the restriction - even if they are on your side of the road - then they have priority over you, and you should wait and not be a twat.
1:49 they already proceeded before you where even near, whats the point in uploading this?
90% of truck drivers, speed tailgate and push you into another lane whenever they feel like it, they know they're not going to get done there's not enough police about.
I don't think I've ever experienced a truck driver tailgating me in over 30 years of driving. I do like to keep up a decent speed and keep left unless overtaking though, so maybe there's a coincidence there?
How many do you do a year? Couple of thousand I bet @@davem9204
I must be travelling with remaining 10%
DJack, you were lane hogging. That's probably why the trucks were annoyed. And it annoys me to watch it - you could easily have used the left lane (Lane 1).
Richard, you need to retake your driving test little man.
1:01 no rear plate
Doesn't look like a police uniform to me regardless of police van with blue flashing lights.
He was a CCTV operator if I remember correctly.
Honestly if lorries/trucks or any haulage vehicles wants to do more than the speed limit like a 50 or 60 then let them. You’ll overtake them at 70 then you can have the laughs.
5:47 - car was already committed cammer was a douche!
The HGV passed you on your inside as you were hogging the middle lane dear boy, they will be at 50
Police couldn't catch a cold.
3.58 Car is sitting in middle lane, nothing ahead of them, whilst making little or no progress to overtake vehicle in Lane 1. Just move over and stop trying to be the self appointed Traffic Police.
Djack and Richard - surrender your licences please. You both show an unacceptable level of self-entitlement.
Djack turns the camera around to show us his smug face…. lol. This will be on the internet forever of you being soooo wrong, and your desire to lane hog AND THEN POSTING IT FOR ALL TO SEE! Quite unbelievable 😂
Is Richards Surname "Head" I wonder?
Can you stop those 'no give way at priority ' , you do have to stop if the 'non priority' side are coming through
Spotforth, You could SEE he had nowher to go, all you had to do was stop a bit sooner. DOH!
So many tw@ts on this channel.
The clip at 3.05, why are you just sat in the middle lane, the clip at 5.40, he has right of way as he's coming through therefore you should have waited, you may want to read the highway code, I didn't watch the rest as it just frustrates me
I know what you mean about been frustrated by some of these camera vehicles, so at least I hope my clip re-establishes a sort of balance here. All the best Robert.
4:10 this road should not allow any HGV.
farms and some water treatment plants are on these roads, we got no choice
@ look like you live in a 3rd world country lol.
Truck drivers would avoid them if they could, unfortunately they have no other choice when businesses are down them
@@DebsCrokaert shouldn’t the local council do something?
@@MrSabretooth19 Was just about to say the same. I show videos of us having to go down unsuitable for HGV roads to get to farms, because strangely, they are in the countryside. All the best.
silver car wasn't indicating and if want to gonrightbshould of been in the right lane
This is a spiral roundabout and there are two lanes that exit to the right. There is also another roundabout right after this one so they may be preparing to turn left at the next roundabout. This roundabout is a nightmare since its pushing traffic on the roundabout towards traffic entering and I have had a few people pull out on me despite me indicating right.