As it has been settled by the court, the title should read: "I sued my Sister for a crime she did not commit as a child" as "I sued my Sister for a crime she committed as a child" would be accusing her of being guilty. Though it has been decided she is not. Be careful, she could sue you about this, your family has a record of doing this decades later.
I mean, the terms "sue" and "crime" doesn't go in the same sentence. Max has completely mixed civil and criminal elements together. i.e. Civil cases don't determine guilt but instead liability, civil proceedings are also generally not decided by a jury. Also English judges don't use a gavel.
I mean the whole lawsuit was clearly fake as no way a lawyer would represent someone who didn't even know was hired for them nor of the trial at request of person hiring who also happened to be the prosecution. It's extremely unethical. Civil cases in the UK don't have a Jury, never mind the fact a court wouldn't of allowed filming in the first place. Only the Judge during sentencing and final remarks may be filmed.
It's dawned on me that an interactive play where you can take your family to court and have pretend lawyers argue the case in front of a pretend judge and jury would be an incredible tourist attraction in London
Get a bunch of improv comedians to be the lawyers. A real court case would take months, or even years, of work to get all the facts so it'd be much easier (and more fun) to have the lawyers just make shit up as they go along and it's all established as canon by the power of Yes And.
Any major city could pull this off, especially one with famous court houses. It would do well in DC, Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Berlin, Paris, or Rotterdam
Imagine being the jury, you got summoned there and thought youre gonna hear a violent sibling fued, then you just hear the surfshark ad and everything descends from there
I mean I’m pretty sure this is not a real court and I would guess everyone involved was knowing at least in a broader sense that something like this would happen lol
@@flyingstock5979 Well i would say the courtroom is real, same as the lawyers, judge and jury. But they were briefed beforehand of course.. although the judges face when Max mentions the Surfshark ad seemed very real. ^^
@@luzifersohn5010 Yes I could imagine that the lawyers are real lawyers, but in this case they are acting. About the jury idk. Maybe he got a real jury for some money to act in this case. In the UK you aren’t even allowed to Film in court. And this case would barred for a long time. And it wouldn’t be legal that his sister shows up without knowing there is a court case. And this would be a civil case, but civil cases don’t even have juries. And so on and so on. Maybe the judge is also real and he has a day off. Still a funny prank on his sister, it’s just worrying how many people believe that this is a real court case lol
they are actors i recognise one of the jury from when i worked as an extra on movies, and tv shows. Although this doesnt take away from the video i love it
@@thetruebeastbro4813 Yeah this is a youtube video... people found out even the most mundane "prank" channels pretty much always used actors. Anyone who believes videos like this is quite a simple person. This is literally an entertainment channel, of course they plan out all of this with actors. They make a large amount of money off of ads, they just need content that gets viewers here.
After she admitted to scratching you, your lawyer should have instantly fired back with "So lashing out with violence is something you have done in the past? More so this incident was later and would more arguably be a more mature version of yourself which would make it seem very reasonable you had lashed out in this manner prior.""
@@hassan.sh719 the "jury" is just a mix of what looks like random people, some people in suits, plain t-shirts, comfortable sweaters, general casual wear, etc paid actors would probably all be dressed in professional attire, you aint getting paid to wear a turtleneck to court they were probably law students and the judge, prosecution, and defense were probably professors
@@socialistrepublicofvietnam1500 People don't talk like this, it's overly dramatic; and uses phrases people wouldn't regularly use e.g. "what say you" more akin to a trial you'd see in a tv series rather than an actual court room.
I just realized this guy is literally giving all the professionals a good time as well. He gave 2 lawyers a silly prompt and they probably had hell of a time writing it
@@novaspark4208 I doubt it, there was absolutely no legal material. If you want to find out how mind numbingly boring civil court is you can watch it on the Supreme Court website. An actual trial would be 6 hours of "Please could you refer to tab 3 of the bundle, which is page 65, referring to section 7 subsection a paragraph b of the relevant act". Would make for an exceedingly poor TH-cam video.
While true unlikely, it's not impossible (for British law at least) even more unlikely for the States, as the courts could not possibly care less about such a petty case. I honestly doubt they would even hear it.
Here's the thing, although to the viewers this is a setup, but seeing his sister's nervous ticks (playing with her hair), clearly emotional reaction, the feeling of unprepardness and what her brother is doing and slowly coming to the realization this is a joke, but still somewhat serious is what makes the video great.
Looking in google maps it seems like you need to go through a restaurant area to enter that room so she probably knew it is not a real court I think. Looks like a nice hotel though
As a lawyer, I cringed at first at what would happened if they actually went to court. This wastes a court's time and judges usually don't take that kindly. Turns out it's a fake court, no judge would let it go that far, it's obviously passed limitation and is a trifle. Also UK does not have Juries for most civil cases. In fact, juries are only part of the American system because of the people did not trust the UK trained judges at the time.
You claim that's the only reason for juries to exist? Juries are an integral part of U.S. democracy, and even though their power has been tampered with, jury nullification is very much a thing. If the government continues to make silly laws, we may see jury nullification become actually common.
Everyone's an actor, they hired everyone to do the parts, job done. If we put aside the part where they filmed it (not typically allowed in a UK county court). Civil cases do not have juries which is the first giveaway, the second is obviously the surfshark ad which would not be tolerated in the slightest by a real judge.
@@hk78901 the accents of everyone is also too comical to be true. being in a criminal court before (yes the one in the video is civil court, yet has more audience and even a jury which my criminal court didnt), lawyers and judges dont speak like this at all
I dont mind if its staged, that means he didnt waste any actual lawyers or judge's time on a frivolous suit . Edit: Although I do feel that assuming it's staged, Max could have been honest with the audience, and the video still could have worked (like a prank where we're all in on it except for max's sis)
it’s definitely staged. you can’t film in a UK courtroom, we don’t adress the judge as “your honour”, we say “lord/lordship” and “lady” in the UK. Also, the other person has to know they’re going to court.
Honestly, you should actually do a nice video with your sister, like invite her to a theme park and just ride rollercoaster with her. Because at this point, she'll always be super suspicious if you EVER ask her to do anything or be available on any date. I think her paranoia would probably mean she'd always look over her shoulder for what happens next when it's all actually just a nice day spent with your sister for once.
More like pure neutral. Chaotic wouldn't care about legal procedure or documentation or making sure they follow what's "allowed" in any of these videos. Neutral works within the law to thwart the law and do what's not intented. Good would use this loopholing for the greater good, helping people. Most of what Max does is just harmless fun for entertainment (ours and his).
@@meowoasdgjoiagjoi Only the judge and their sentencing remarks can be filmed. Authorised media cannot film any other court user - including defendants, victims, witnesses, jurors and court staff. From the government website, why do you think sketch artists exist? You can’t film in court
As much as I love Max the fact that there is a full jury in a civil case (which while unheard of isn't common in the UK for civil cases especially ones which aren't big liable cases) and also that there's 13 of them would indicate this was setup. Jolly good fun though.
@@RobDavisAkaMonk It's during the trial too, so that they can continue the trial in case a juror becomes ill or needs to be replaced for some other reason.
He isn't suing his sister. There is a jury who finds her not guilty, which is not how a civil case works. The entire video does not follow the procedure of both criminal or civil cases. It is entirely a set up.
Thank you Fosh! Now I know that if I have a minor childhood grievance with my sister that I should take it all the way to court! I need to make a phone call to my lawyer now...
imagine being in the jury of this case. You show up for a court case that happened 22 years ago between siblings. Then the plaintiff starts telling you about surf shark
Despite this obviously being actors and not a real courtroom, this was still hilarious! Well played to both lawyers for coming up with good arguments in a case two decades old with no evidence besides the two people involved!
@@katrinapaton5283 considering i'm English myself thats not something you're gonna need to worry about. i probably should have clarified british youtubers though
6:06 The exact moment where his sister understood what all this is about and her look goes from anxious/uncertainty to "this little sh*t" .... As an older sibling, all I can say is that, I understand.. 😂
I have a scar on my forehead, not unlike Harry Potter, after my evil sister wielded the potty of despair against me, and used it to thrust me upon the protruding corner of a wall. You sir, are giving me ideas.
I laughed so hard at this! I cannot imagine having you as a little brother. Kudos to your sister for putting up with your antics. I'm glad she was "acquitted". LOL😂😂
Your videos ALWAYS make me forget the issues I'm facing. I know that if it's like that for me, it's like that for at least 99% of your viewers. Sending much love from Australia.
LOLOL. I never laughed so much in my life! The moment when he turns to the camera and starts to recite the advertisement. LOL. That is some state-of-the-art comedy right there. Best ever. Mad props to you Max Fosh.
Don't worry, Max, I 100% believe you. Your sister has proven time, and time, and time and again that she NEVER admits responsibility for her actions. Therefore, it makes sense she doesn't want to admit to something so bad as to harm her sibling. It's obvious she's guilty.
It's scripted man the jury are just a bunch of paid actors it's illegal to film in a court house so how would the video be real and before you say i was joking you legitmately said she was guilty and said how she wronged him multiple times bro not everything on the internet is real.
@legendenfutte4931 Except jokes are funny and set up for punch lines. There is no punch line at all just a slight sarcasstic overtone which doesn't make it a joke. Either you people tell funny jokes or GTFO.
It is so sad to see such an injustice carried out, I cannot help but feel that the legal system in the United Kingdom is in shambles if this sort of thing can occur.
This is definitely NOT a real courtroom, at least not in England and Wales- if civil there's virtually no civil jury in E/W, if criminal it should be Rex v defendants, judge is wearing the wrong attire, people standing in the wrong places etc.
Fun video, and I love it. I am not overly familiar with British court procedures, but I can’t imaging this was an actual court of law, more like The People’s Court of Judge Judy. I cannot imagine that the defendant in a real civil trial is allowed to just not show up, and they would certainly have a right to know the details of the case before showing up.
Argh no - the 'not guilty' kinda gives the game away. That only happens in criminal cases, not civil cases. But still, this is top tier content. The commitment to silliness is a delight.
@@hk78901 I mean if we're going for the first giveaway that it was going to be a mock trial rather than any real legal proceedings I'd be torn between the fact it was clearly not a justiciable issue and that no court would sit for a case that the defendant doesn't even know about yet 😅
After watching this, I had a sudden desire to take one of my brothers to court. But then I remembered that one of them is an exceptionally good be attorney
Imagine being randomly chosen as jury for a random court case, and it happens to be a youtuber who has organised a court case against his sister for pushing him into a wall 22 years earlier.
@@hader3303 Yes...but its still a courtroom. The entire courtroom could've been empty, and he STILL DID AN AD READ IN A COURTROOM. LITERALLY. Where does your brain not work on this?
This would have been so much better if it was setup as a joke on Max's sister, rather than trying to pretend this was a real court (which it patently isn't for numerous reasons).
For more silly antics, come see me on tour! Get your tickets here: maxfosh.co
Funniest ad transition I've ever seen
@@deadboyo2773 same
ball
You silly silly man
@@deadboyo2773 fr
the balls on this man to do an ad read in the middle of a court case is honestly astounding
My thoughts exactly
@SuperAgent if you're going to promote at least use an actual funny joke
@Scarlett Witch 🅥 What are these bots getting too…
editor did a great job there
There is no way that this was a real case. This is staged for sure
Imagine being, legally, the best sibling and then suing the inferior one 😂
and then losing
@The Grinch 🅥 stop
and LOSING the suit
Clown behaviour 🤣
now she must sue him for making an illegal contract by deceiving his parents
Max takes the "annoying little brother" to a whole new level
hey
As it has been settled by the court, the title should read: "I sued my Sister for a crime she did not commit as a child" as "I sued my Sister for a crime she committed as a child" would be accusing her of being guilty. Though it has been decided she is not.
Be careful, she could sue you about this, your family has a record of doing this decades later.
Indeed! She could sue him for false allegations!
I mean, the terms "sue" and "crime" doesn't go in the same sentence. Max has completely mixed civil and criminal elements together. i.e. Civil cases don't determine guilt but instead liability, civil proceedings are also generally not decided by a jury. Also English judges don't use a gavel.
Technically not, because Max could appeal this, thus it is still able to be alleged.
@@jessthomas3910 If a court decides on a case, you are not allowed to deny the results
I mean the whole lawsuit was clearly fake as no way a lawyer would represent someone who didn't even know was hired for them nor of the trial at request of person hiring who also happened to be the prosecution. It's extremely unethical. Civil cases in the UK don't have a Jury, never mind the fact a court wouldn't of allowed filming in the first place. Only the Judge during sentencing and final remarks may be filmed.
If Mum cancelled lunch for you proves you are the favourite child .
Legally binding and now confirmed in action. Enough said.
I actually think it’s quite the opposite considering they were planning to go to lunch without him 😅
@@mehr0x Damn you and your plausible logic! Not needed here, she was simply going to tell her the inevitable truth!
Moms like their sons and dads like their daughters more.
@@EmilSosnin You don't have kids do you...
It's dawned on me that an interactive play where you can take your family to court and have pretend lawyers argue the case in front of a pretend judge and jury would be an incredible tourist attraction in London
then try making it real
You’re a genius, I would absolutely go to that if I was ever in London
It'd be an expensive attraction
Get a bunch of improv comedians to be the lawyers. A real court case would take months, or even years, of work to get all the facts so it'd be much easier (and more fun) to have the lawyers just make shit up as they go along and it's all established as canon by the power of Yes And.
Any major city could pull this off, especially one with famous court houses. It would do well in DC, Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Berlin, Paris, or Rotterdam
Imagine being the jury, you got summoned there and thought youre gonna hear a violent sibling fued, then you just hear the surfshark ad and everything descends from there
I mean I’m pretty sure this is not a real court and I would guess everyone involved was knowing at least in a broader sense that something like this would happen lol
@@flyingstock5979 Well i would say the courtroom is real, same as the lawyers, judge and jury. But they were briefed beforehand of course.. although the judges face when Max mentions the Surfshark ad seemed very real. ^^
@@luzifersohn5010 Yes I could imagine that the lawyers are real lawyers, but in this case they are acting. About the jury idk. Maybe he got a real jury for some money to act in this case. In the UK you aren’t even allowed to Film in court. And this case would barred for a long time. And it wouldn’t be legal that his sister shows up without knowing there is a court case. And this would be a civil case, but civil cases don’t even have juries. And so on and so on. Maybe the judge is also real and he has a day off. Still a funny prank on his sister, it’s just worrying how many people believe that this is a real court case lol
they are actors i recognise one of the jury from when i worked as an extra on movies, and tv shows. Although this doesnt take away from the video i love it
@@thetruebeastbro4813 Yeah this is a youtube video... people found out even the most mundane "prank" channels pretty much always used actors. Anyone who believes videos like this is quite a simple person. This is literally an entertainment channel, of course they plan out all of this with actors. They make a large amount of money off of ads, they just need content that gets viewers here.
So Max definitely just rented an empty court room and hired a bunch of actors right? I can’t believe these people are actual legal professionals.
Yeah must be this shit looks fake as fuck
Still an enormous effort!
He could've hired professionals to do fake court for the day
For sure. The way the judge and lawyers talk is so dramatic.
4:59 "What happened to you that fateful day"
10:40 "What say you?"
I can confirm, as a lawyer myself, that this is a fake court situation but still a great effort to pull off
After she admitted to scratching you, your lawyer should have instantly fired back with "So lashing out with violence is something you have done in the past? More so this incident was later and would more arguably be a more mature version of yourself which would make it seem very reasonable you had lashed out in this manner prior.""
I can’t believe this man really just said “This video is sponsored by Surfshark” in court
it's not a real court.
@@DeHyntonGaming i don't think anyone thinks it is
ur a idiot
Define real Court
@@DeHyntonGaming i think its a civil court
This DEFINITELY has to be a law school exercise. There is NO way this could have happened in an actual court. Lol
staged w paid actor's
@@hassan.sh719high chance it was law school students. Its wayyy cheaper than actual actors lol
@@hassan.sh719 the "jury" is just a mix of what looks like random people, some people in suits, plain t-shirts, comfortable sweaters, general casual wear, etc
paid actors would probably all be dressed in professional attire, you aint getting paid to wear a turtleneck to court
they were probably law students and the judge, prosecution, and defense were probably professors
@@socialistrepublicofvietnam1500 People don't talk like this, it's overly dramatic; and uses phrases people wouldn't regularly use e.g. "what say you" more akin to a trial you'd see in a tv series rather than an actual court room.
Probably a moot court
I just realized this guy is literally giving all the professionals a good time as well. He gave 2 lawyers a silly prompt and they probably had hell of a time writing it
They're actors.
@@peterwhitey4992 law school students
@@novaspark4208 I doubt it, there was absolutely no legal material. If you want to find out how mind numbingly boring civil court is you can watch it on the Supreme Court website. An actual trial would be 6 hours of "Please could you refer to tab 3 of the bundle, which is page 65, referring to section 7 subsection a paragraph b of the relevant act". Would make for an exceedingly poor TH-cam video.
Max doing a sponsored segment in court is just gold
saying "this video is sponsored by Surfshark" under oath just so there's no doubt left in anyone's mind this video is, in fact, sponsored by Surfshark
Sister very breedable
@@HerrmannAusHH fucking gross
it's all staged but still cracked me up
@@HerrmannAusHH gtfo pf here weirdo
As a legal representative, I found this hilarious! But you wouldn’t have a jury in civil cases like this. But bravo, absolutely hilarious
so in your opinion, how did he get a jury in? paid actors in a rented court room?
@@DanielNetSetyeah paid actors. He started talking about surf Shark and nobody interuptet him. It's not real still funny
While true unlikely, it's not impossible (for British law at least) even more unlikely for the States, as the courts could not possibly care less about such a petty case. I honestly doubt they would even hear it.
*She thinks she's innocent,*
*I think she's a cold-blooded hottie!*
@@DanielNetSet paid actors for sure
not max’s lawyer being my high school substitute teacher 💀
Wait what
@@GabrielPellot-o1f he’s an actor lmao
@@gabooshi oh my goodness
Here's the thing, although to the viewers this is a setup, but seeing his sister's nervous ticks (playing with her hair), clearly emotional reaction, the feeling of unprepardness and what her brother is doing and slowly coming to the realization this is a joke, but still somewhat serious is what makes the video great.
On god.
You can actually see early on she's legitimately crying poor girl
@Chris_Cross wtf are you talking about? She wasn't crying at any point. Just very uncomfortable.
Looking in google maps it seems like you need to go through a restaurant area to enter that room so she probably knew it is not a real court I think. Looks like a nice hotel though
Only Max would give his sister a criminal record for a childhood game
Except this is civil, not criminal...
tell us you have no idea how the legal system works without saying you have no idea how the legal system works
@@pmLite_ Sorry, should've called Saul
@@pmLite_ I assume he was joking, I mean I have no evidence but I just couldn't live with myself if somebody actually believes that.
E
Having the judge and Max just sit there covered up by the screen had me howling hahaha
The Judge, the jury and the audience not laughing at this is what gets me!
Actors are good at that
700th like
How fake do you want it
As a lawyer, I cringed at first at what would happened if they actually went to court. This wastes a court's time and judges usually don't take that kindly. Turns out it's a fake court, no judge would let it go that far, it's obviously passed limitation and is a trifle. Also UK does not have Juries for most civil cases. In fact, juries are only part of the American system because of the people did not trust the UK trained judges at the time.
as much as i found the video obviously fake, are you seriously trying to say that the UK doesnt have juries?
@@plainenglishhI think what he means is civil courts don’t have juries in the UK
@@plainenglishh yes for most civil cases
You claim that's the only reason for juries to exist? Juries are an integral part of U.S. democracy, and even though their power has been tampered with, jury nullification is very much a thing. If the government continues to make silly laws, we may see jury nullification become actually common.
@@plainenglishh They do, but mostly only for criminal cases. Civil cases are usually tried by a single judge.
6:00 “now back to what happened in 2001” 💀💀
Damn
I don't think I've ever wanted a behind the scenes video more. If you've got more on this, please do share.
Everyone's an actor, they hired everyone to do the parts, job done.
If we put aside the part where they filmed it (not typically allowed in a UK county court). Civil cases do not have juries which is the first giveaway, the second is obviously the surfshark ad which would not be tolerated in the slightest by a real judge.
@@hk78901 I think we are all aware that this was just acting but still ... a bts would be fun to watch 🤣
@@hk78901 If his sister really didn't know about this then it was all worth it. Doesn't matter if it's a real judge or an actor.
@@hk78901 the accents of everyone is also too comical to be true. being in a criminal court before (yes the one in the video is civil court, yet has more audience and even a jury which my criminal court didnt), lawyers and judges dont speak like this at all
@@Alex-ez9bl yeah if a judge dont speak mumbling like hes in a hurry and already tired of being in court hes not really a judge
When the judge is trying to make a fair and legitimate trial, and the prosecutor starts talking about surfshark on the stand.
“I m sure Cleopatra siblings had a trial before they died”….. yeah about that
I’m convinced that Max just did this video so that he had an excuse to do an ad read in the middle of a court room
Well he didnt though. Its fake
Are you stupid enough to believe it's real?
@@TheFrontyer Yeah, totally AI generated
@@chmuurkaa3030 No, the whole court case was fake, the people were actors. Clearly.
I dont mind if its staged, that means he didnt waste any actual lawyers or judge's time on a frivolous suit . Edit: Although I do feel that assuming it's staged, Max could have been honest with the audience, and the video still could have worked (like a prank where we're all in on it except for max's sis)
maybe, the only person who doesn't know it's staged is his sister...
I think the lawyers were real but everything else was set up like a mock trial
it’s definitely staged. you can’t film in a UK courtroom, we don’t adress the judge as “your honour”, we say “lord/lordship” and “lady” in the UK. Also, the other person has to know they’re going to court.
@@Chloe-dv9hf it's called a prank, only the sister doesnt know
@@ManuelSteiner i’m aware it’s a joke, i just thought i’d explain for those that were still unsure
I was laughing out loud multiple times during the video. You're sister is a very good sport
5:10 That is no doubt the greatest transition in TH-cam history.
Remember, you can take your sister to court but should not court your sister.
Now you tell me
Xianxia moment
😂😂😂
😂😂
What are you doing step-lawyer,
Honestly, you should actually do a nice video with your sister, like invite her to a theme park and just ride rollercoaster with her. Because at this point, she'll always be super suspicious if you EVER ask her to do anything or be available on any date. I think her paranoia would probably mean she'd always look over her shoulder for what happens next when it's all actually just a nice day spent with your sister for once.
The more I watch Max's videos... The more I realise he is literally the personification of Chaotic Good
Omg literally tho
Crazy but harmless............Max Fosh
More like pure neutral. Chaotic wouldn't care about legal procedure or documentation or making sure they follow what's "allowed" in any of these videos. Neutral works within the law to thwart the law and do what's not intented. Good would use this loopholing for the greater good, helping people. Most of what Max does is just harmless fun for entertainment (ours and his).
And creative
Max in 2040 : Suing my parents and sending my parents to Jail for bringing me into this world without my consent
Matt??
You can't go to jail as a result of a lawsuit
@@user-qwertyfly345 Autocorrect innit
Caphernauming the parents
don't give him ideas
I love how happy she is at the end! So cute!
Imagine being called to jury duty for this to be the case…
Imagine thinking this is real
@@user-rp2tz9lr1m No its totally real
@@meowoasdgjoiagjoi Only the judge and their sentencing remarks can be filmed. Authorised media cannot film any other court user - including defendants, victims, witnesses, jurors and court staff.
From the government website, why do you think sketch artists exist? You can’t film in court
I also think that it is real.. because she looked quite scared as well...
@@MeiinUK you must be disabled
As much as I love Max the fact that there is a full jury in a civil case (which while unheard of isn't common in the UK for civil cases especially ones which aren't big liable cases) and also that there's 13 of them would indicate this was setup. Jolly good fun though.
I agree it's fake, and cannot say how a UK jury is sat, but in the US, extra jurors are always there in case one or more are dismissed.
@@Skittl1321 isn't that during the jury selection process or is that after the trial has started too?
Nothing gets past you Sherlock
Oh, the whole surf shark ad as he took the stand wasn't a big enough clue?
@@RobDavisAkaMonk It's during the trial too, so that they can continue the trial in case a juror becomes ill or needs to be replaced for some other reason.
Okay. First time watching any video on this channel and you just gave me courage to sue my brother for bullying 20 years go. So inspiring
I'm glad her name was cleared in this completely legit case. Now let's hope she's the bigger person and doesn't come after you for defamation.
Yeah your right it is fake i thought i sensed some sarcassm when you said completly legit.
Max is the person to sue his sister for an altercation that happened when they were kids, and make it interesting.
He isn't suing his sister. There is a jury who finds her not guilty, which is not how a civil case works. The entire video does not follow the procedure of both criminal or civil cases. It is entirely a set up.
@@benolifts I'm still left here wondering the most important part of this whole video.
Where did they go for lunch, and did they invite their mother?
@@benolifts I’m wondering why any of that matters
Thank you Fosh! Now I know that if I have a minor childhood grievance with my sister that I should take it all the way to court!
I need to make a phone call to my lawyer now...
honestly, i think it’s so sweet how Max was just happy seeing his sister having a big smile on her face
I have a feeling that losing was scripted and the whole point of the video was to make her smile
@@runed0s86why? She’s a violent scumbag
@@runed0s86 - The whole thing was scripted. They were all just actors.
She needed a hug after that
Tell me you're not an American without telling me you're not an American
Max is the one kid at the playground who says they'll sue everyone when they grow up, and actually do it
9:12 “Would you care to elaborate.” “No.” “Your honor she’s lying.” “What?”
Yep. She didn’t say anything there. And it’s „honor“ 😅
Future Max: “I legally made my parents disown my sister!”
imagine being in the jury of this case. You show up for a court case that happened 22 years ago between siblings. Then the plaintiff starts telling you about surf shark
5:21 bro did a full on ad in court
Only the so does surfshark the rest was said later and edited in😅
This Judge is the best actor of all time.
And his sister laughing the whole time just makes it funny.
Bro was flabbergasted 5:18
LOL😭
10:57
“Shit I lost”
I’m fucking dying😂
"Mumsy coming in clutch for her favourite child" what a line
6:55 her face goes "oh did we? I guess we did!“ 😂😂😂
6:00 "Now back what happened in 2001"💀
💀💀💀💀
Max is slowly using TH-cam to get back at every past wrong in his childhood- first the primary school teacher and then the sister 😂
Lol 😂
Despite this obviously being actors and not a real courtroom, this was still hilarious! Well played to both lawyers for coming up with good arguments in a case two decades old with no evidence besides the two people involved!
In the beginning I was all curious... but when it started one could tell 100%, the lawyers are actors. 😅😂
Man sues his own sister for a crime 20+ years ago when they were children and then loses the case. That's a news article waiting to happen.
Max has got to be the funniest british person ive seen in a while
@Scarlett Witch 🅥 shut up
One of the good ones
Perhaps you should watch some actual British comedians.
May I suggest "Would I Lie To You?"
@@katrinapaton5283 considering i'm English myself thats not something you're gonna need to worry about. i probably should have clarified british youtubers though
5:10 I died at this part
Too funny.
I’m glad that she won. It was so nice to see her so happy after being so terrified.
Loved the drawing too. Nice souvenir.
your sister's facial expressions during the court case are priceless
6:06 The exact moment where his sister understood what all this is about and her look goes from anxious/uncertainty to "this little sh*t" .... As an older sibling, all I can say is that, I understand.. 😂
I have a scar on my forehead, not unlike Harry Potter, after my evil sister wielded the potty of despair against me, and used it to thrust me upon the protruding corner of a wall.
You sir, are giving me ideas.
Imagine getting called for Jury Duty to be met with this
I can’t believe this was a real court case he would’ve been thrown out if he did that ad read
max is easily the most creative person on youtube. always blows my mind 😅
I laughed so hard at this! I cannot imagine having you as a little brother. Kudos to your sister for putting up with your antics. I'm glad she was "acquitted". LOL😂😂
cried with laughter at the ad transition, its so max fosh
Your videos ALWAYS make me forget the issues I'm facing. I know that if it's like that for me, it's like that for at least 99% of your viewers.
Sending much love from Australia.
LOLOL. I never laughed so much in my life! The moment when he turns to the camera and starts to recite the advertisement. LOL. That is some state-of-the-art comedy right there. Best ever. Mad props to you Max Fosh.
10:05 “lispy boi”
The Judge’s face when you started talking about Surfshark is priceless
i feel so bad for her, she just wanted lunch
There's no such thing as a Fosh lunch
@@KevFrost lol
oh rahh
The judges face when he started the ad tho 😂
Don't worry, Max, I 100% believe you.
Your sister has proven time, and time, and time and again that she NEVER admits responsibility for her actions.
Therefore, it makes sense she doesn't want to admit to something so bad as to harm her sibling.
It's obvious she's guilty.
It's scripted man the jury are just a bunch of paid actors it's illegal to film in a court house so how would the video be real and before you say i was joking you legitmately said she was guilty and said how she wronged him multiple times bro not everything on the internet is real.
@@lucianking1451 And what makes you think nicodamus is serious, ey? May I remind you that not everything on the internet is real....
@Macewindy bro thinks he made a point by repeating my last words.
@@lucianking1451 it's a joke
@legendenfutte4931 Except jokes are funny and set up for punch lines. There is no punch line at all just a slight sarcasstic overtone which doesn't make it a joke. Either you people tell funny jokes or GTFO.
Max never stops making great videos! Keep up the great work❤‼️
Your sister walked free even though she has a history of abusing you and hurting you. The court system is awful!
It is so sad to see such an injustice carried out, I cannot help but feel that the legal system in the United Kingdom is in shambles if this sort of thing can occur.
I'm so glad his sister is a good sport 😅, I'd like to sue my brother for having the big room, it's a totally foolproof plan.
This is definitely NOT a real courtroom, at least not in England and Wales- if civil there's virtually no civil jury in E/W, if criminal it should be Rex v defendants, judge is wearing the wrong attire, people standing in the wrong places etc.
It wouldn't even been a law school exercise in E/W
Fun video, and I love it.
I am not overly familiar with British court procedures, but I can’t imaging this was an actual court of law, more like The People’s Court of Judge Judy.
I cannot imagine that the defendant in a real civil trial is allowed to just not show up, and they would certainly have a right to know the details of the case before showing up.
Yeah this video is fake and those are actors, but funny to watch
Argh no - the 'not guilty' kinda gives the game away. That only happens in criminal cases, not civil cases.
But still, this is top tier content. The commitment to silliness is a delight.
Well the other being that civil cases do not have juries...
@@hk78901 I mean if we're going for the first giveaway that it was going to be a mock trial rather than any real legal proceedings I'd be torn between the fact it was clearly not a justiciable issue and that no court would sit for a case that the defendant doesn't even know about yet 😅
The fact it's filmed already gives the game away that it's fake, as does the fact she doesn't know about it until she walks into the courtroom.
Also doing in ad read in the middle of court
Wait...the fucking surfshark ad didn't give the game away? Or that it was filmed?
10:58 never thought i'd hear max swear
missing file at 1:00 haha as a fellow final cut user, you have no idea how many times I've opened up final cut and been terrorized by that logo!
"Before we continue this trial, I would like to thank our sponsor"
6:30 Judge is wondering what he is doing with his life 😁
😂😂😂
After watching this, I had a sudden desire to take one of my brothers to court. But then I remembered that one of them is an exceptionally good be attorney
Imagine being randomly chosen as jury for a random court case, and it happens to be a youtuber who has organised a court case against his sister for pushing him into a wall 22 years earlier.
I love how he actually follows through on his promises and isn’t clickbait.
There is no way he actually did a sponsored bit in a courtroom!! 😂 Now that’s silly to the max!
of course he did not
@@panda4247 I mean, yes he did. It wasn't technically in session in legal terms, but he absofuckinglutely did an ad read in a courtroom...
@@lanmandragoran8337 its prob a staged court
@@lanmandragoran8337 it literally fake
@@hader3303 Yes...but its still a courtroom. The entire courtroom could've been empty, and he STILL DID AN AD READ IN A COURTROOM. LITERALLY. Where does your brain not work on this?
He did that ad read on oath, so you know he’s speaking the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth
The way Max Fosh' mind works is unpredictable. And I... decided to just sit here and enjoy the chaos in every video.
Max-"I'm bored today, you know what would be fun!"
Us- "what"
Max-"I'm going to sue my sister over something that happened as a child
Us-sounds good 👍
Thanks for the likes lol
Large white screen slides down slowly. 7:05
Judge: 🙄😮🙄
Good to see the court system being put to good use
This would have been so much better if it was setup as a joke on Max's sister, rather than trying to pretend this was a real court (which it patently isn't for numerous reasons).
She was crying until he said "Today's Sponsor is SurfShark" lol
If it’s a civil case, why are they saying ‘Prosecution’ instead of ‘Claimant’?
I think the videos with Tali in them are my favourite. She's such a good sport.
maybe i can sue my brother for hitting by with a ball and knocking me over when i was taking my first steps as a child!
Maybe!