Striker is Not Out Hit wicket, it looked like she was trying to avoid being stumped. The non-striker was out of his ground when the wicket was fairly broken by the WK.
Striker is not out hit wicket. The law states that the striker is not out hit wicket if they were trying to avoid being stumped or run out. In this video the striker is avoiding being stumped and in that action of making their ground they break the wicket so not out hit wicket. The video there is an appearance of one bail being dislodged when the wicket was broken. The striker in setting off first run had they broken the remaining bail or pushed a stump out of the ground would have probably been out hit wicket, if the strikers end umpires opinion satisifies that the striker set of immediately for the first run. For me had this taken place I still would not have given this out for hit wicket as it did not appear the striker immediately set of for the first run The non striker is out run out as they were short of the crease the time wicket was broken by the stump struck out of the ground by with the fielder with the ball in hand. Alot easier to sell the run out.
The decision would vary from how you look at the incident. Batter may be out hit wicket if you consider the momentum to be her not finishing the shot and she may be not out if you consider otherwise. But one thing is sure that the run out is not possible as the wickets have already been broken.
The hit wicket was too close for me. I would not have dismissed #26. While it's possible another umpire could see her momentum from her initial swing as the cause for her hitting the wicket, it's just as likely that it was the act of avoinding a stumping, which is specifically a not out under 35.2. So for me, if it's ambiguous, I don't give the dismissal. If that's the case (and my partner didn't have a strong opinion otherwise), #52 would be the one dismissed for run-out.
There is no doubt that the movement is quite ambiguous and possible of different interpretation. My view is: She is still in the back swing of her stroke & there is no break in the action suggesting otherwise. There is no 'going back into the crease' here. She was inside. I see the breaking of the wicket by the Striker being part of her playing the ball. And, hence, Out, Hit Wicket. This should be viewed in actual speed in order to have the right impression about the 'end of the stroke'. Watching it in only Slo-Mo and, then, deciding might lead to a wrong conclusion because slo-mo enhances and stretches the action and shows a gap where there isn't any.
Does not look LBW as the impact seems to be just outside the line of off stump. I don’t think it should be a Hit Wicket as the striker had completed her action in receiving the delivery(different views welcome). I would say its a Run Out, although the wicket was already broken, wicket keeper managed to uproot a stump with ball in her gloves before the batter made her ground.
Thank you all for your answers to this scenario. Let's analyse the merits of each of the 3 appeals: a. The ball appears to hit the striker outside the line of the off stump with the striker playing a shot. Therefore, Not Out LBW. b. The striker has completed playing the sweep shot when she slides her bat into the stumps, in an attempt to avoid being stumped. Therefore, Not Out Hit Wicket. c. The wicket is fairly broken by being struck out of the ground by the wicket keeper, with the non-striker short of her ground. Therefore, the correct answer is c. #52 Out Run Out
Striker is Not Out Hit wicket, it looked like she was trying to avoid being stumped. The non-striker was out of his ground when the wicket was fairly broken by the WK.
Striker is not out hit wicket. The law states that the striker is not out hit wicket if they were trying to avoid being stumped or run out. In this video the striker is avoiding being stumped and in that action of making their ground they break the wicket so not out hit wicket.
The video there is an appearance of one bail being dislodged when the wicket was broken. The striker in setting off first run had they broken the remaining bail or pushed a stump out of the ground would have probably been out hit wicket, if the strikers end umpires opinion satisifies that the striker set of immediately for the first run. For me had this taken place I still would not have given this out for hit wicket as it did not appear the striker immediately set of for the first run
The non striker is out run out as they were short of the crease the time wicket was broken by the stump struck out of the ground by with the fielder with the ball in hand. Alot easier to sell the run out.
The decision would vary from how you look at the incident. Batter may be out hit wicket if you consider the momentum to be her not finishing the shot and she may be not out if you consider otherwise. But one thing is sure that the run out is not possible as the wickets have already been broken.
The strike is not out hit wicket she was trying not been stumped so it not out hit the wicket, the non strike is out run out out
The hit wicket was too close for me. I would not have dismissed #26. While it's possible another umpire could see her momentum from her initial swing as the cause for her hitting the wicket, it's just as likely that it was the act of avoinding a stumping, which is specifically a not out under 35.2. So for me, if it's ambiguous, I don't give the dismissal.
If that's the case (and my partner didn't have a strong opinion otherwise), #52 would be the one dismissed for run-out.
There is no doubt that the movement is quite ambiguous and possible of different interpretation.
My view is:
She is still in the back swing of her stroke & there is no break in the action suggesting otherwise. There is no 'going back into the crease' here. She was inside. I see the breaking of the wicket by the Striker being part of her playing the ball.
And, hence, Out, Hit Wicket.
This should be viewed in actual speed in order to have the right impression about the 'end of the stroke'. Watching it in only Slo-Mo and, then, deciding might lead to a wrong conclusion because slo-mo enhances and stretches the action and shows a gap where there isn't any.
Does not look LBW as the impact seems to be just outside the line of off stump. I don’t think it should be a Hit Wicket as the striker had completed her action in receiving the delivery(different views welcome). I would say its a Run Out, although the wicket was already broken, wicket keeper managed to uproot a stump with ball in her gloves before the batter made her ground.
Gweebjah
Thank you all for your answers to this scenario.
Let's analyse the merits of each of the 3 appeals:
a. The ball appears to hit the striker outside the line of the off stump with the striker playing a shot. Therefore, Not Out LBW.
b. The striker has completed playing the sweep shot when she slides her bat into the stumps, in an attempt to avoid being stumped. Therefore, Not Out Hit Wicket.
c. The wicket is fairly broken by being struck out of the ground by the wicket keeper, with the non-striker short of her ground.
Therefore, the correct answer is c. #52 Out Run Out