they don't have to be. After seeing the COD gameplay, it's most likely going to crush BF1, BF1 has a slim shot but it has to knock it out of the park. Lots of competition this year
Every year it's the same thing, same hype. It's always the year COD goes down and every single year EA drops the ball. Sorry single player, porous online connections. The popularity of Modern Warfare remastered I promise you would beat BF1 sales alone. Even at 90 it will move more units. BF is the franchise that you either wait to play until they patch the bugs or you simply forget about like Hardline which wasn't bad but it wasn't memorable either. I'll believe in BF1 when I see it, but history tells me, nope it will fail. I could easily see Activision making another slick move like gain access to World at War redux and that would push it all over the top
glorytheman depends on the battlefield.. The misconspections here are hilarious. On the one hand everyone belives ww1 was only trench warfare and then there were no automatic guns. Then reality is that automatic guns turned the battlefields to static trench warfare because it forced people to stay in cover. So in France Machine Guns were used extensively and were very common. Other battlefields had less of these guns and were much more mobile therefore. Submachine guns and mobile machine guns did occur only at the end of the war in high numbers, but they were not experimental anymore at that point. So your wrong.
For example MP-18 produced 17.634. Gewehr 98 produced ~15.000.000 German Army in WWI 13.250.000 The ratio of machines to rifles - 0,0000011 In game only snipers have rifle.
El Cavas Firstly your wrong, ww1 also had sub machine guns. Secondly your still wrong because this game does not have assault rifles, which are the most boring and most used weapon in every modern war game.
Everyone was questioning a ww1 theme, saying it would be boring/lack content. Now that DICE use slightly historically inaccurate weapons and vehicle mechanics to make the game more fun and add content, the Internet gets upset and demands a ww1 simulator.
Because this isn't WW1, it's just a BF4 reskin...and neither BF4 nor this in any way accurately depict combat. DICE have done nothing to prove the viability of war games as they've never produced one.
+7dayspking your right DICE has never created war simulators. They create FUN video games. Not sure why you expect any more realism from a AAA fps franchise.
The Germans had the MP-18 smg. Other than that yeah most all soldiers had bolt-action rifles. But then again, this is Battlefield lol it's not gonna be completely realistic. Like in BF3-4, you get to use weapons that most troops in combat would never get to use.
Yes they were. Look up the MP18, used by Germany's Sturmtruppen. You should also know this is an alternate timeline, so this criticism doesn't work anyway. Gameplay > historical accuracy.
Sweet macaroni, so many people are arguing over WW1 facts and the game. So will anyone join me in saying that this game looks good? Without mentioning WW1? No? Anyone? God. I'm so alone.
The beta version is way too much fun! I like how it went way retro. It would be nice if it were historically accurate but regardless, the game play is ridiculously awesome!
I'm actually against the parkour, i think it will eliminate choke points and tactical routes people can take because you could effectively just run in a straight line from A-B for any objective.
I don't think he was promoting he is actually a console gamer Xbox one, unless they use one of his songs for a trailer then I think snoop dog is there having fun with BF.
LumeXxTv The majority of weapons used in WWI by infantrymen were bolt action rifles. Most other types of weaponry, that were semi-auto and fully-auto were not used till very late in the war, and never on the scale of bolt-action rifles. That is, not counting in machine guns. But even so, the usage of bolt-action rifles was higher than machine guns. Where, so far in the gameplay videos that I've seen of Battlefield 1, almost everyone uses everything but bolt-action rifles (not talking about the few "sniper" guys that roam around).
It looks really freakin sick. The gun models, animations and art in general looks amazing. I can't wait to get into the game and play it. The greatest thing about a Battlefield game is sprinting/driving/flying to a capture point that you just know the enemy is headed for too, or already waiting at. The excitement and suspense is terrific
Now I'm being kinda picky, but one thing that really bothers me is when people or animations in games, when shooting the mauser model 98, take the clip out of the gun before closing the bolt. You do not have to take out the stripper clip before closing the bolt, I don't know about any other bolt action designs, but I know that with the Mauser action it is not necessary. If you are in combat I do not believe that you would take the time to take the clip out when all you would have to do is close the bolt.
i mean it looks cool. but it doesnt really have a ww1 feel. more like a ww2 game with ww1 skins. i was hopping for a new twist on the gameplay. maybe something involving trenches.
you're too light and skippy and invincible. it's another BF game since BF3 where you can practically glide all around the map and perform impossible feats in less than a second, you can literally dive into a room, headshot 3 enemies and dive out before anyone gets a shot off. BF:BC2 was the last one to get the weight right, ever since then you just feel too powerful all the time
well you don't wanna cruise at 5km and take like half the game to get to the first point only to be blown by c4 and find out the enemy team is already occupying it.
+Terren Orndorff yeah I think it only talks about the objective it's not like it will talk it will only say stuff like emeny has objective and I think it's kind of cool it's sounds like the injustice robotic female voice it's cool I like it it's a ww1 theme en the robotic woman voice is like hey we are so high tech we can do any theme and war games this is the real field camp online 😂😂😂
if ur thinking that its gunna get much better than this then dont get ur hopes up. When the game ships it will look pretty much just like this. If you'e ever seen or played the other bf games then this is pretty much it.
+Gilberto Alfonso the graphics improve a slight bit but your mostly right from this point untill the game is released all their really gonna be fixing is bugs in the game
+Kyle Palmer I am commenting on another fps making op smgs that have the same range as rifles but I guess your not smart enough to understand my comment
killin Straya Your comment was dull enough to begin with....Why do you think you have barely have any likes? Next time just refrain from commenting, you dont seem to have an humor or wit to begin with...Think before you type kid.
was hoping for epic trench warfare with semi auto/ bolt rifles with the occasional slow moving tank that is really hard to kill and epic aerial battles and horses. instead we got re skinned battlefield 4. and everyone is talking about how cod is unimaginative.
If the game was realistic You would be sitting in a trench for 6 months without shooting one bullet You would see only a tank every 2 years, that travels at 3 km per hour And you would die of deseases and eaten by rats NOW THAT WOULD BE BORING!
the plane physics seem to be unfinished, but knowing EA the game will be released with planes colliding into the ground and towers with nothing happening
As I suspected, completely unfaithful to anything WWI. 1. Tanks move way too fast. Not only that, they weren't utilized in urban warfare during WWI. 2. Offensive action in WWI was comprised of charges and company-sized maneuvers at a minimum, not individuals or squads running around in small groups. 3. Automatic weapons are far too prevalent. Even by the end of the war they were scarce and notoriously unreliable. The only common automatics were stationary and operated by fire team sized elements (Maxims, Vickers, Brownings, etc.)
It's all true what you are saying but for a game it's going to get very boring very quickly if all you do is run towards your enemy straight in front of you and shoot away with the same bolt action rifle and then run back to your own trench.
It is it's just that it's set somewhere in 1917 or 1918. In the beginning 1914. these technologies was slowly used more advanced every year. This is set late in the war the technology was be a slight more better with moving tanks. It's called 20th technology and 19th century tactics.
They need to make the game as tactical as counter strike for it to be a masterpiece. Make the spray patterns difficult and make the gameplay patterns fun but hard to master. Some examples; accuracy is dramatically reduced when being shot at, reduced accuracy while shooting, and increased effectiveness for utility (grenades shouldn't be used just for the sake of killing an enemy)
i'm fully aware that this is just a game. but using that tank like rumble car is too much for me. well maybe because im playing many hours on warthunder
+faisal roufa war thunder is realistic, this by the way, its a battlefield but the mechanics and kill is almost same like cod, yeah since Battlefield 4 and hardline. Battlefield is mor like cod now
Both of which existed and were in really interesting places in terms of design and innovation during WWI? I don't get the point of your comment. Those ARE WWI weapons (for the most part)
Cause for the most part solders in ww1 didn't use fully automatic machine guns. Lots of people in this video shows people using machine guns. Thats why I find it gunny. Im sure the game is good but the fear that ww1 wouldnt be fun cause of the weapons almost proved true. But thank goodness it was just almost.
Well, i think so too. The vast majority of the soldiers had bolt action rifles without scopes and no sidearms. Smg's like the mp 18 shown in the video were only used by few soldiers and saw just short combat in the last months of the war. -Machineguns were not hipfired, most were simply too heavy. -Tank vs.tank combat never happend in WWI, because Germany produced almost no tanks( 20 or so) -The airships were used as reconnaisance and for bombing missions and not for strafing. Anyway that doesnt mean that Bf1 is a bad game. It just focuses more on the gamplay and sacrifices some historic accuracy for that. Other games are more authentic like Verdun or Red Orchestra but don't have the gameflow of Bf.
I feel like people wouldn't like being restricted to just semi autos and bolt actions. Yes, it helps with historic accuracy, but it doesn't make the game very fun, at least imo. If they were an all class thing, though, this would be a different story.
so many 12 year olds are going to ruin the gaming experience and that breaks my heart. also I'm calling it now- there is only going to be 4 multiplayer maps, the rest are dlc's
+ReptilianCaptain That is a very fallacious comment. The statistics indicate that only about 29% are under the age of 18, which means the majority of gamers (71%) are adults, and the average age is 31. In fact, there are more adults over 36 playing video games than there are kids.
Don't be stupid What I meant by this is the replayablity this game is going to need. Not many people are going to stick around if their in a trech with a bolt action rifle. . .or running around with a bolt action.
Nope, Kar98 was WWII, as the Kar98 was the carbine (shorter) version of the Gewehr 98. Either way, though, I think that you need to be a designated shock trooper class to use an SMG, which is a bit more historically accurate since German Stormtroopers were the only ones to get them (although there were indeed not as many working SMGs at the time)
+kill4money213 Well As I know there was another Mauser rifle just like Kar98, and in WWI shock troops had swords and bayonets. Dude Those times flintlock rifles were classic not antique.
We gotta tell yaz. At first we we're a little worried about this game. We still love playing Bad Co. 2 / Vietnam and Battlefield 1943 both on the PS3. BUT after an hour they get a little blah because of the minor weapon/vehicle perks we have to choose from. Will BF1 keep us mentally stimulated being it's a World War 1 game. It kinda looks like it in this video.
There are maps with trenches but please read up on WW1, because it's not all just trenches and mud. Not being rude just informing you, because the game they've made is pretty historically accurate in most places.
A load of celebritys was playing this lol Wizz Khlaifa Terry Crews Zack Effron Jamie Fox snoop dogg wow battlefield really did capture one hell of an audience, great job jobs Outstanding work Dice :)
The most powerful tank mounted weapon at the time had a maximum effective horizontal distance of more or less 2000 meters. The zeppelins meanwhile could fly at 10,000 feet, that's about two miles. Also, a bullet hole in a zeppelin isn't much of a problem anyway. These zeppelins were huge, the escaping hydrogen is marginal and the pilots could safely complete their missions and return without worrying about it. And when it does deflate slowly it wouldn't behave like a party balloon, its a rigid structure with several gas bags inside. Hitting the zeppelin doesn't mean you hit a gas bag. A bullet also wouldn't be anywhere near being able to ignite the hydrogen. A bullet can't even ignite a tank of gas, which is significantly easier (there's a myth busters episode on this as well). That is until incendiary rounds started being used, which wasn't until later in the war. So the planes having no significant effect on the zeppelin also makes sense.
+Erik Bakker if any game was totally realistic it won't be fun. if this game was we would be sitting in a trench for hours without firing a single round. then when you hear a whistle you run straight at the enemy and get mowed down. that would be the game.
+Brendan Leach I think he's referring to how they're on open fields quite a bit. In WW1 most battles were fought in trenches, and while they're in this game they don't seem to be emphasized on this map.
Depends on which battles of WW1 you look at. WW1's most well known image is of trench stalemates, but by the time the Mark IV tank, which is in this gameplay alot, was invented people actually started to figure out how to use proper fire and maneuver tactics. So by the time these tanks were rolling around the war got a lot more mobile.
All of the people complaining about the lack of trench warfare but you have to remember that this is not only one map but it's still a Battlefield game. I would largely bet that this game's equivalent of Metro and Locker will be a trench warfare heavy map. In addition Battlefield 1 includes a "Domination" gamemode which seems like a perfect environment for the trench warfare. Even the Operations gamemode could open up potential for trench warfare.
this game looks good, probably going to pick it up along with my first console however I feel like it won't live up to the hype (much like the star wars game)
also stop talking about realism/it's better then cod, if we were talking about which game is better, it would have to be games that went in 2 complete directions
no bcs i would get arested for smashing a shovelwielding germans head in with my own spade they made it look realy grim in the trailerwith that tank popping up like the mamoth it was
Sure, lets have a game where we sit in a water-logged trench for months, then have our feet peel off of our ankles when we try to take our boots off. Gangrene, not even once.
Wow I can't wait for this game. This is the only map I've seen so far being played. Looks dark and gritty just like how'd you imagine World War. Everything from the sounds, to the visuals of these historic weapons, and locations is awesome.
only in dlc ?? damn it that make no sense ! that was one of the main army in WWI, more ,numerous that the british one ! -_-' with the german empire of course ...
+IlI Shift the Brits built the first tank, without it the war would've been lost. Not to mention the backup the Brits provided the French with on the western front. The help from the British commonwealth and empire was immense, without the naval fleets of the empire the war would've also been lost. The Brits helped a lot my friend and without the help from Britain the outcome of the war could've been incredibly different.
MrEthanSimpson I don't think any of those features are worth another drop of $60+. I realize that this game was obviously not meant for me then, but I would have preferred the changed up their template a little more. Battlefield is now just as bad as COD, and this is coming form a battlefield 1942 player (which was my first battlefield game).
it depends what battlefield you are fighting on. Technically in France early in the war battles were like this. Only after the german Soldiers were ordered to fortify and defend their positions did trench warfare begin. Just without zeppelins that were actually effective.
Halo CE Magnum Battles were never like a BF game in any period throughout history, ever....apart from the unrealistic...EVERYTHING (from unrealistic health/damage models for vehicles and players, non-functioning armour, unrealistic weapon mechanics, 'balancing' changes to things like explosives...etc.etc.) another issue is players in BF have no self-preservation...they sprint around with their unlimited energy and shoot off willy nilly, hundreds of RESPAWNED players are killed within a matter of minutes...also players are confined to a very limited path with almost no ability to traverse obstacles. BF is just another arcade shooter and BFO is just a BF4 reskin.
the unique technology exclusive to ww1, trench warfare.. you can find exciting things here but if you're looking for this game to turn into uncharted-gearsofwar-titanfall then no, this game will remain Battlefield
wut? Don't you have a brain? This is a mayor company that made a WW1 game with great graphics and gameplay, just needs some more guns and vehicles and perfect!
seriously. I mean im a battlefield fan, but this isnt much of a change from their other games. Except now the guns are shittier and theres even less vehicles to get u around the map. Although to be fair I've always hated WW1/2 games. I just never liked using the old weaponry. When this game was announced I was a little curious but now seeing this, im gunna have to pass
How is this a reskin? You whiny kids get in the way of every new game, this game changed in almost every way, they added fully destructible maps, climate change, new weapons, new era, new vehicles, melee weapons, and what you saw here was just PRE ALPHA gameplay so imagine how good the game will be.
But just to remind that World War One was not just trenches by trenches. There was city lock downs, ambushes, this game is set in 1917 or 1918. Everyone is looking at a typical view of WW1 trust me guys please guys study it! Year by year in WW1 the technology would become more advanced and slightly upgraded. It's called 20th century technology and 19th century tactics.
will there be a game mode where there isn't all that stupid UI on the screen? the blue and red squares on the players looks pretty dumb and seems like it would make it feel a lot less immersive
Memphis Spotter lol i would have thought a game like cod would have a super casual mechanic like this. But the last cod i played was cod 3 so i don't know for sure. this mechanic just seams like it could ruin flanking and any sort of stealth, as you literally have a target on your head...
I was about to comment on that... That moment at 9:42... how fast is that frigging tank going?! I know games tend to sacrifice realism for the fun of it, but that's way over the top, it looks so stupid...
This is a nice preview but I'm sick and tired of celebrities play games first when they are a small minority. Let the real people who play the games preview the game.
They visibly didn't, the best scoring player of the celebs was Wiz Khalifa with a 2-11 K/D and a score of 7056, and the best K/D of the celebs was Richard Sherman with a 9-11, these weren't actual players, they were publicity
Battlefield Games are getting too hi-tech. They actually have guns and tanks!? Are you kidding me? They need a good battlefield with horses, swords and shields...
1. It's made in sweden, DICE Stockholm. 2. The Battlefield series hasn't been and will never be a simulator like Arma 3. Like Barney said, fun before realism.
You do realize that Modern Tanks can go about 25mph or 40kph on surfaces other than concrete right? It's not much of a stretch to think that WW1 Tanks could go at 16mph or or 20 kph.
+Blue Phoenix Guy 1. Modern tanks can go a lot faster than 40 and 2. The top speed of the mark 4, which was a lighter tank, was 4 mph... The top speed of the heavy tanks were around 2 mph.
I wish you could play as a commander but also be playing the game. One teammate controls the entire team. Also having the ability to request covering fire, request assistance, things like that. That's really what I wanna see.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
These Battlefield games are getting too hi-tec. I want a game set in a real war, you know, like the ones in space...
stick to COD then
Wtf?
Guys you know this is sarcasm right?...
LMFAO !!!!
I'm loving the smoke on the ground.
It looks like BF1 will be the victor in shooters to finally go back in time, and I'm bloody happy about it.
im freaking happy too because my kin was strongest nation back then we were not strong in ww1 but we will be there too :)
Titanfall 2, Modern Warfare redux
those arent in the past tho
they don't have to be. After seeing the COD gameplay, it's most likely going to crush BF1, BF1 has a slim shot but it has to knock it out of the park. Lots of competition this year
Every year it's the same thing, same hype. It's always the year COD goes down and every single year EA drops the ball. Sorry single player, porous online connections. The popularity of Modern Warfare remastered I promise you would beat BF1 sales alone. Even at 90 it will move more units. BF is the franchise that you either wait to play until they patch the bugs or you simply forget about like Hardline which wasn't bad but it wasn't memorable either. I'll believe in BF1 when I see it, but history tells me, nope it will fail.
I could easily see Activision making another slick move like gain access to World at War redux and that would push it all over the top
Is Snoop smoking weed while playing Battlefield? Lol
The gameplay should make you high enough as it is.
Wiz Khaifa Was there Smoking weed At 0:30-0:40
That was too funny to watch when they showed him!😂
I wouldn't call that playing. He is so high he can't even look around....
yes xD
Snoop Dogg smoking weed while playing killed me.
same lol
"WW1 would be a terrible idea for a game"
Is it really?
The american independence war would be a terrible idea for a game, unless you add some automatic weapons and 40km/h tanks.
WW1 had automatic weapons
glorytheman depends on the battlefield.. The misconspections here are hilarious. On the one hand everyone belives ww1 was only trench warfare and then there were no automatic guns. Then reality is that automatic guns turned the battlefields to static trench warfare because it forced people to stay in cover. So in France Machine Guns were used extensively and were very common. Other battlefields had less of these guns and were much more mobile therefore. Submachine guns and mobile machine guns did occur only at the end of the war in high numbers, but they were not experimental anymore at that point. So your wrong.
For example
MP-18 produced 17.634.
Gewehr 98 produced ~15.000.000
German Army in WWI 13.250.000
The ratio of machines to rifles - 0,0000011
In game only snipers have rifle.
El Cavas
Firstly your wrong, ww1 also had sub machine guns. Secondly your still wrong because this game does not have assault rifles, which are the most boring and most used weapon in every modern war game.
I like how the mini map (radar) has this like compass design to it lol
I know it's like the old school call of dutys
+The Little Jacob )":
Oh my god the memories.
+The Little Jacob no way
+Stephen Sturgis that's a good thing
Everyone was questioning a ww1 theme, saying it would be boring/lack content. Now that DICE use slightly historically inaccurate weapons and vehicle mechanics to make the game more fun and add content, the Internet gets upset and demands a ww1 simulator.
Yeaaaaah... people are never really happy
Because this isn't WW1, it's just a BF4 reskin...and neither BF4 nor this in any way accurately depict combat. DICE have done nothing to prove the viability of war games as they've never produced one.
fearleslegend Battlefield one is pretty much a COD reskin. I'd prefer Red Ochestra =)
+7dayspking your right DICE has never created war simulators. They create FUN video games. Not sure why you expect any more realism from a AAA fps franchise.
fearleslegend Sure mate.
To all the people complaining, you could always just pick up a copy of infinite warfare instead.
Omfg 😂 but really I don't understand why people are complaining? It looks incredible!!
😩🔫 (me) smh
Or Titanfall 2
?
I was watching the stream, most of the players were high asf. Wiz, Snoop, Efron, Jamie Fox. You even saw Snoop playing with a blunt in his mouth LMAOO
@6:35 Snoopy with a blunt in his mouth. LMAOOO classic
he's so high hes just walking into the wall lmfaooo
in snoops defense, they were playing on pc, i think hes a console guy. but he was probly high
+Rauliont Zennfaegrin he used an xbox controller...
+Ryan jealous
In WW1 soldiers weren't equipped with SMGs. In fact, nearly all of the soldiers had a bolt action rifle.
some were.
if a weapon saw service it could be in battlefield
The Germans had the MP-18 smg. Other than that yeah most all soldiers had bolt-action rifles. But then again, this is Battlefield lol it's not gonna be completely realistic. Like in BF3-4, you get to use weapons that most troops in combat would never get to use.
Bro do you know how boring the game would be if most of the soldiers were equipped with bolt action rifles?
Yes they were. Look up the MP18, used by Germany's Sturmtruppen.
You should also know this is an alternate timeline, so this criticism doesn't work anyway. Gameplay > historical accuracy.
Celebrity Kill-Death Score
Wiz Khalifa 2-11 7056
Richard Sherman 9-11 6892
The Game 4-7 6117
Snoop Dogg 0-4 5811
Larry "Major Nelson" Hryb 3-12 5763
Zedd 4-9 3029
Tyrese Gibson 1-11 2737
Zac Efron 2-11 2650
Marshawn Lynch 1-15 2292
Jamie Foxx 1-9 1142
Lupe Fiasco 0-7 945
Terry Crews 0-8 585
Emily Ratajkowski 1-10 324
LMFAO
my man Wiz being a team player lol
ok i understand they are celebrities and probably arent hardcore gamers, but i mean its not hard to atleast get a few kills
unless they're up against levelcap, jackfrags and ponylion
Lynch was probably like "I played the game so I don't get fined"
Sweet macaroni, so many people are arguing over WW1 facts and the game.
So will anyone join me in saying that this game looks good? Without mentioning WW1?
No?
Anyone?
God. I'm so alone.
This is a good game. ^~^
yeah man totally
WW1 looks great
I'm buying it. It's the closest thing I can get to a Battlefront 2015 Campaign. XD
It is a pretty sweet looking game. Don't really care about the WW1 facts. The game is just fun. I got lucky enough to play in the Closed Alpha!!
The beta version is way too much fun! I like how it went way retro. It would be nice if it were historically accurate but regardless, the game play is ridiculously awesome!
hopefully they add a trench based map to cut down flanking
last man standing would be great for the trench map
I think this is a nobrainer. A map like this is 100% included.
Its WW1......of course there will be a trench based map.
I'm actually against the parkour, i think it will eliminate choke points and tactical routes people can take because you could effectively just run in a straight line from A-B for any objective.
***** yeah but full on trenches. No buildings just trenches and a no mans land in the middle
am i the only one that saw snoop dogg with the blunt in his mouth playing stoned?
Nope
yeah haha, smoking a blunt and making bank promoting this game
lmao straight G
I don't think he was promoting he is actually a console gamer Xbox one, unless they use one of his songs for a trailer then I think snoop dog is there having fun with BF.
Can somebody explain to me how can Snoop Dogg always smoke weed legally?
RIP Battlefield, oh wait.. wrong game
L
+Infused Shotz L
L
L
L
Why are there sooooooo many semi and fully automatic weapons? This is WWI, bolt action rifles should be prevalent...
I agree
Because it's a game.
You know nothing about the World war 1... google all weapons who were used in this time... you will find alot of semi and fully autometic weapons
Yes, but they weren't common at all. Only 5000 examples of the German MP
18 were made. Most of the weapons used were bolt action.
LumeXxTv The majority of weapons used in WWI by infantrymen were bolt action rifles. Most other types of weaponry, that were semi-auto and fully-auto were not used till very late in the war, and never on the scale of bolt-action rifles. That is, not counting in machine guns. But even so, the usage of bolt-action rifles was higher than machine guns. Where, so far in the gameplay videos that I've seen of Battlefield 1, almost everyone uses everything but bolt-action rifles (not talking about the few "sniper" guys that roam around).
i really like the look and the tone, cant wait to see single player, hopfully they break the streak of bad single player in bf
well bc1 and 2 werent bad
Yeah, the single player is hopefully gonna be AMAZING
+MrSquifler they're bland and predictable
I saw somewhere a while back that they're going with the more open world-ish style campaign. Hopefully something like Bad Company
+MrSquifler I don't know about that bro lol
It looks really freakin sick. The gun models, animations and art in general looks amazing. I can't wait to get into the game and play it. The greatest thing about a Battlefield game is sprinting/driving/flying to a capture point that you just know the enemy is headed for too, or already waiting at. The excitement and suspense is terrific
Now I'm being kinda picky, but one thing that really bothers me is when people or animations in games, when shooting the mauser model 98, take the clip out of the gun before closing the bolt. You do not have to take out the stripper clip before closing the bolt, I don't know about any other bolt action designs, but I know that with the Mauser action it is not necessary. If you are in combat I do not believe that you would take the time to take the clip out when all you would have to do is close the bolt.
basically any mauser design that is fed with stripper clips can be closed while the clip is in the gun 98k, arisaka etc...
+Salt Factory yeah, on my arisaka in real life you can close the bolt with the clip still in it
I have a 98k and I close the bolt with thclip in it
Searose101 Is the arisaka a nice gun?
Someone already disliked in the first few seconds when the video is 14+ minutes long
Probably cause 360 p
Jealous fuckers haha
+LightningSamus W
Cod shills damage control lol
Well yeah, that's TH-cam
6:55
Announcer: " Yep see snoop telling his players what to do "
Dude: Get up there snoop!
Snoop: How do you jump?
Why aren't there any exo suits?
Because this is better than CoD
Wrong video and game...
There is armor suits if that makes you feel any better.
Lol its a joke guys ffs
Well COD got em all... :P
i mean it looks cool. but it doesnt really have a ww1 feel. more like a ww2 game with ww1 skins. i was hopping for a new twist on the gameplay. maybe something involving trenches.
Fore one there was trenches and ww1 tanks look completely different from ww2 tanks
its not the full game
trenches are really boring for combat and not a route battlefield would go down sadly. I would like to see it in the campaign hopefully though.
you're too light and skippy and invincible. it's another BF game since BF3 where you can practically glide all around the map and perform impossible feats in less than a second, you can literally dive into a room, headshot 3 enemies and dive out before anyone gets a shot off. BF:BC2 was the last one to get the weight right, ever since then you just feel too powerful all the time
well you don't wanna cruise at 5km and take like half the game to get to the first point only to be blown by c4 and find out the enemy team is already occupying it.
Anyone else noticed Snoop playing while puffin on a blunt? Lmao
I'm pretty sure everyone noticed. There are like 1,000 comments talking about that.
Oh yehh... Snoop without a blunt would be abnormal... Im shocked that Wiz is not smocking... :P
+Ishmam shahir he did at one point
+Young Archivest and the funniest comment of today goes to you sir hahahaha the sarcasm UNBELIEVABLE
Explosive Mayhem Oww really??? Didn't notice man.... :D
Can I turn off the Female AI voice in my Helmet?
i hope so
Lol ikr i didnt know cortana from halo was in this game..
i rather listen to a womans voice :D
I think it was just a place holder , it won't be there for release
+Terren Orndorff yeah I think it only talks about the objective it's not like it will talk it will only say stuff like emeny has objective and I think it's kind of cool it's sounds like the injustice robotic female voice it's cool I like it it's a ww1 theme en the robotic woman voice is like hey we are so high tech we can do any theme and war games this is the real field camp online 😂😂😂
when I saw wiz I doubted it was him, but once I saw Jamie fox I knew it wiz.
it was wiz
And Snoop Dogg, Terry Crews, Zac Efron. Not many lady celebrities tho :(
+Krisb BeatS So
the girls are too busy painting their nails, as if that's supposed to be more fun lol
+jRex918 lol but i find doing nails boring. Warfare is beautiful
BF1 >>>> COD IW
L
L
W
Neither has been released so how do you know?
+james walker
by the last few years
Worried that it's going to be way too easy for everyone to just lug around a semi-auto rifle and an SMG like this isn't WW1 at all...
I guess they done that because if they would have been 100% historically accurate, it would have been way too boring
thats what I thought
ETHAN BRADBERRY
Verdun disagrees.
Verdun is such a great game
Yeah only way you could pull off a true WW1 game that is actually fun to play is to have 1,000 man servers.
AWESOME GAME but I think the voice that tells about the capture points kind of ruins the experience hearing the futuristic sound of it
Capturing areas are actually part of a war
I know but the futuristic voice bothers me
It's just a placeholder, not the final product, so don't worry. You won't be playing a WWI game with a WW5 sounding voiceover.
I don't know I never really thought of it as futuristic, I thought of it more as a old-time English accented woman like from London
It's a place holder voice for the beta
SNOOO DOG SMOKING A BLUNT LMFAO
6:35
ikr
hahhahahahhahhahahaga
Where??
This is pre alpha? This looks like an already made game. Great job!
Yep :D
if ur thinking that its gunna get much better than this then dont get ur hopes up. When the game ships it will look pretty much just like this. If you'e ever seen or played the other bf games then this is pretty much it.
+Gilberto Alfonso the graphics improve a slight bit but your mostly right from this point untill the game is released all their really gonna be fixing is bugs in the game
Don't say that too loudly; they just might prematurely release it and have all their servers crash!
+Gilberto Alfonso I don't really care it look great already, as long I'm getting what I'm seeing, unlike ubisoft.
Shooting people from 100+ yards with a sten with barely any recoil, seems legit
Its a game...
Hes not smart enough to realize that though....Games always have to be 100% realistic...
+Kyle Palmer I am commenting on another fps making op smgs that have the same range as rifles but I guess your not smart enough to understand my comment
killin Straya
Your comment was dull enough to begin with....Why do you think you have barely have any likes? Next time just refrain from commenting, you dont seem to have an humor or wit to begin with...Think before you type kid.
+Kyle Palmer thank you for your truly justified insults I mean how dare I have an opinion on the gameplay
was hoping for epic trench warfare with semi auto/ bolt rifles with the occasional slow moving tank that is really hard to kill and epic aerial battles and horses. instead we got re skinned battlefield 4. and everyone is talking about how cod is unimaginative.
Epic trench warfare? You mean sitting in a hole for 6 months?
You're a noob
Stupid child,there is MORE MAPS,FFS
There was nothing epic about trench warfare xP Battlefield has a good concept of what makes a fun shooter, why should they stop using it?
If the game was realistic
You would be sitting in a trench for 6 months without shooting one bullet
You would see only a tank every 2 years, that travels at 3 km per hour
And you would die of deseases and eaten by rats
NOW THAT WOULD BE BORING!
reallly snoop you just burn one in the middle of ign haahahhaha str8 g
he savage for that
Hells yeah, I would too.
dude as soo as i sa that, i went straight to the comment section to see if anyone saw that too. lolz
Jonathan Carbajal
str8 blunt smoke.
the plane physics seem to be unfinished, but knowing EA the game will be released with planes colliding into the ground and towers with nothing happening
.
It's still only Pre-Alpha gameplay, they'll get around to it. I hope.
Juicy Ponkman
that is the thing though, they won't until a year after it is out
**plane hits ground... nothing happens**
nah nah the physics engine is finished
it's in pre alpha
snoop with the blunt!! lmao 😂😂
this game will be awesome though!
Joint but never mind
+Aidy A no it's a blunt
+Fucky Youy no a blunt is weed rolled with tobacco leaves like a cigar
+Aidy A you have obviously never smoked a blunt so there is no reason to even argue
Snoop Dog playing with Stone Mountain? More like Stoned Mountain
dude he's just standing there ripping that L
This looks dope! The WWII shooter everyone wants.
:facepalm: It's not in WWII
Bahahaha!
ahhh
WWI*
Ww1, but hey, it is a past history game and i like it
am I the only one hype because of the destruction and the airship falling down just YYYYYEEEEESSSS
ThinkTanks.com No, the game just looks that awesome.
+ThinkTanks.com yep it is
As I suspected, completely unfaithful to anything WWI.
1. Tanks move way too fast. Not only that, they weren't utilized in urban warfare during WWI.
2. Offensive action in WWI was comprised of charges and company-sized maneuvers at a minimum, not individuals or squads running around in small groups.
3. Automatic weapons are far too prevalent. Even by the end of the war they were scarce and notoriously unreliable. The only common automatics were stationary and operated by fire team sized elements (Maxims, Vickers, Brownings, etc.)
It's Battlefield. If you want something realistic, try Verdun and stop complaining on TH-cam.
Mahn if the tanks move too slowly people will start losing interest on using the tank
It's all true what you are saying but for a game it's going to get very boring very quickly if all you do is run towards your enemy straight in front of you and shoot away with the same bolt action rifle and then run back to your own trench.
It is it's just that it's set somewhere in 1917 or 1918. In the beginning 1914. these technologies was slowly used more advanced every year. This is set late in the war the technology was be a slight more better with moving tanks. It's called 20th technology and 19th century tactics.
Do you think that this is a war simulator? This is multiplayer, not singleplayer.
They need to make the game as tactical as counter strike for it to be a masterpiece. Make the spray patterns difficult and make the gameplay patterns fun but hard to master. Some examples; accuracy is dramatically reduced when being shot at, reduced accuracy while shooting, and increased effectiveness for utility (grenades shouldn't be used just for the sake of killing an enemy)
There should be horses. I wanna take a sword and charge people on horseback.
YES lawrence of arabia style!
There will be. In the full game, on a different map.
There is horses they just don't want to show everything right away.
nice memes
This ain't Witcher 3 babyyyyy
this is WW1 right? isn't that tank moves too fast?
Yes, but it's also an arcade esq series. Anyone that was expecting a simulator of the real WW1 are looking in the wrong place.
well its a game, no soldiers want to run crazy across the map like those players also.
i'm fully aware that this is just a game. but using that tank like rumble car is too much for me. well maybe because im playing many hours on warthunder
+faisal roufa war thunder is realistic, this by the way, its a battlefield but the mechanics and kill is almost same like cod, yeah since Battlefield 4 and hardline. Battlefield is mor like cod now
where did you get an early copy of Battlefield 1 to feel how the game mechanics feel like? I want a free copy aswell...
What are these celebs doing gaming? That's surprising. And awesome.
publicity. Don't know why but I'm sad to find out they weren't that good.
They like playing games too.
Awesome until you see snoop smoking in that closed crowd ._.
+Emphazed that was a joint, and I think the smoke from weed is not harmful. I don't know though.
why cristiano ronaldo in "a shampoo commercial"
! ?
u get the pic :)
So funny how they tried really hard to promote and say using ww1 weapons will be fun. Then everyone is moving to machine guns or using pistols. Lol.
Both of which existed and were in really interesting places in terms of design and innovation during WWI? I don't get the point of your comment. Those ARE WWI weapons (for the most part)
Cause for the most part solders in ww1 didn't use fully automatic machine guns. Lots of people in this video shows people using machine guns. Thats why I find it gunny. Im sure the game is good but the fear that ww1 wouldnt be fun cause of the weapons almost proved true. But thank goodness it was just almost.
Well, i think so too. The vast majority of the soldiers had bolt action rifles without scopes and no sidearms. Smg's like the mp 18 shown in the video were only used by few soldiers and saw just short combat in the last months of the war.
-Machineguns were not hipfired, most were simply too heavy.
-Tank vs.tank combat never happend in WWI, because Germany produced almost no tanks( 20 or so)
-The airships were used as reconnaisance and for bombing missions and not for strafing.
Anyway that doesnt mean that Bf1 is a bad game. It just focuses more on the gamplay and sacrifices some historic accuracy for that. Other games are more authentic like Verdun or Red Orchestra but don't have the gameflow of Bf.
Max müller Exactly.
I feel like people wouldn't like being restricted to just semi autos and bolt actions. Yes, it helps with historic accuracy, but it doesn't make the game very fun, at least imo. If they were an all class thing, though, this would be a different story.
so many 12 year olds are going to ruin the gaming experience and that breaks my heart.
also I'm calling it now- there is only going to be 4 multiplayer maps, the rest are dlc's
They are not going to ruin it, we are going to destroy them xD
+Michael Perez
Indeed, it's called Squeaker XP (formerly known as "free XP")
+João Manoel That won't stop the kids parents from buying the game for them. It happens all the time. Lots of kids play games for mature audience.
+SwaffyX I thought it was called "poopin on kids"...
+ReptilianCaptain That is a very fallacious comment. The statistics indicate that only about 29% are under the age of 18, which means the majority of gamers (71%) are adults, and the average age is 31. In fact, there are more adults over 36 playing video games than there are kids.
I don't think that there were this much SMG at WWI, mostly Kar98 Bolt Action used
They wanna keep the game fresh so they have them like this. . .
+Coloratura fresh? this makes it like al other battlefield games. more the opposite of fresh..
Don't be stupid What I meant by this is the replayablity this game is going to need. Not many people are going to stick around if their in a trech with a bolt action rifle. . .or running around with a bolt action.
Nope, Kar98 was WWII, as the Kar98 was the carbine (shorter) version of the Gewehr 98. Either way, though, I think that you need to be a designated shock trooper class to use an SMG, which is a bit more historically accurate since German Stormtroopers were the only ones to get them (although there were indeed not as many working SMGs at the time)
+kill4money213 Well As I know there was another Mauser rifle just like Kar98, and in WWI shock troops had swords and bayonets. Dude Those times flintlock rifles were classic not antique.
Snoop dog is a console noob,but wins with his real cannon.
He went 0-4
+Levi Adams I saw that too hahaha i was like "still always classic"
I've preordered my last game 10 years ago, now I feel the time has come again, bless you DICE!
Maan this game is EXACTLY like I wanted a WW game to be, bigger maps, amazing graphics, 64 players
Graphics are beautiful. Snoop dog with a blunt in his mouth is MVP
The multiplayer looks alright to me. It could get boring over time imo
Have u ever played BF???
you never played bf have you
Seems like you havent played bf
It's just a prediction guys.
Darenn Freitas
I played the beta and a trial of the battlefield 3 campaign and multiplayer
We gotta tell yaz. At first we we're a little worried about this game. We still love playing Bad Co. 2 / Vietnam and Battlefield 1943 both on the PS3. BUT after an hour they get a little blah because of the minor weapon/vehicle perks we have to choose from.
Will BF1 keep us mentally stimulated being it's a World War 1 game. It kinda looks like it in this video.
Lmao is snoop really smokin a blunt in there 😂😂😂
Was that Burnie Burns near the start?
It was!
A fellow rooster teeth fan I see
Gavin was there too, his name can be seen a few times
Yeah lol
Burnie chilling right beside Wiz Khalifa hahaha 😂
OMG SO COOL
lol
My god this looks amazing!!! I cant wait to get my hands on this game! I've been wanting a WW1 game so bad.
meh i was hoping for a more realistic, trench warfare style game
Remember that they only played on one map. The warfare could be different depending on the other maps.
that's not how battlefield is in style of gameplay.
plus it wouldn't be as fun for most.
There are maps with trenches but please read up on WW1, because it's not all just trenches and mud. Not being rude just informing you, because the game they've made is pretty historically accurate in most places.
if u want a supeeer realistic game battlefield isnt for u...arma is the super realistic type of game
+Brother Pig lmfao
Snoop dawgs a noob confirmed
Yeah he used a controller. Pleb
Lol he walked back and forth as if he didn't know how to look left and right, either that or he was high. XD
he was smoking a joint at the same time tots blazed of his face hahah
that's exactly how you play when ur high, it's almost impossible to use a joystick after injecting a whole marijuana
You never smoked before have you kid..
IGN 8.5 Battlefield 1, IGN 9.5 CoD IW... I swear if they'd give CoD a higher score than BF1 I would start laughing😂
A load of celebritys was playing this lol Wizz Khlaifa Terry Crews Zack Effron Jamie Fox snoop dogg wow battlefield really did capture one hell of an audience, great job jobs
Outstanding work Dice :)
Is the zeppelin really that realistic?
Wouldn't it blow up with like 1 shot from a tank? It's full of hydrogen and the outside is like just fabric.
The most powerful tank mounted weapon at the time had a maximum effective horizontal distance of more or less 2000 meters. The zeppelins meanwhile could fly at 10,000 feet, that's about two miles.
Also, a bullet hole in a zeppelin isn't much of a problem anyway. These zeppelins were huge, the escaping hydrogen is marginal and the pilots could safely complete their missions and return without worrying about it. And when it does deflate slowly it wouldn't behave like a party balloon, its a rigid structure with several gas bags inside. Hitting the zeppelin doesn't mean you hit a gas bag.
A bullet also wouldn't be anywhere near being able to ignite the hydrogen. A bullet can't even ignite a tank of gas, which is significantly easier (there's a myth busters episode on this as well). That is until incendiary rounds started being used, which wasn't until later in the war.
So the planes having no significant effect on the zeppelin also makes sense.
+Kosaro finally someone in this comment section who picked up there history book and didn't fall asleep in history class bravo dude👍👍👍
+Erik Bakker if any game was totally realistic it won't be fun. if this game was we would be sitting in a trench for hours without firing a single round. then when you hear a whistle you run straight at the enemy and get mowed down. that would be the game.
Zeppelins didn't have just 1 layer of fabric btw. It was multiple layers
+Erik Bakker those tank were known to reach 20 mph without much problem
eh looks alright still better than infinite warfare but I'm more hyped for titanfall 2 and the next mass effect
When is the next mass effect?? I thought that's a long ways away
yeah can't wait to play the campaign in titanfall
Meant to be out Nov, got pushed back till March 2017.
Give me good old wars over boring futuristic games.
Mass Effect=\=boring futuristic game
Serious question, do these kind of games get sold in Germany?
Yes.
No they only get sold in the US
+INVI misinformation
Why not? Ô_ô Every COD playing in WW2 was sold in Germany too.
ALL COD games have been sold in Germany.
Only difference is that swastikas have been replaced with Iron Crosses, and less gore in some of them.
I just love all the snipers running around aiming down sights while strafing and getting head shots. So realistic...
Ah! *hiss* THE UI LOOKS SO MUCH LIKE BATTLEFRONT!!!!
I'M GETTING PTSD FLASHBACKS!
That's not WW1 that's more like WW2, still better than COD #RIPCOD
what do you mean that its like ww2?
Why compare games with two different gameplay styles? That's just dumb.
+Brendan Leach I think he's referring to how they're on open fields quite a bit. In WW1 most battles were fought in trenches, and while they're in this game they don't seem to be emphasized on this map.
Depends on which battles of WW1 you look at. WW1's most well known image is of trench stalemates, but by the time the Mark IV tank, which is in this gameplay alot, was invented people actually started to figure out how to use proper fire and maneuver tactics. So by the time these tanks were rolling around the war got a lot more mobile.
Wiz Khalifa was probably high lmfao
did you not see the joint in snoops mouth? haha
Wiz is high 24/7 lol
Snoop dogg was smoking a blunt and is only smoking blunts
All of the people complaining about the lack of trench warfare but you have to remember that this is not only one map but it's still a Battlefield game. I would largely bet that this game's equivalent of Metro and Locker will be a trench warfare heavy map. In addition Battlefield 1 includes a "Domination" gamemode which seems like a perfect environment for the trench warfare. Even the Operations gamemode could open up potential for trench warfare.
360p quality, really?
Wait for TH-cam to render it. Patience young Padawan.
Are you new?
Just wait :/ #TH-camPLZ
#360pSQUAD
prossesing video...
this game looks good, probably going to pick it up along with my first console however I feel like it won't live up to the hype (much like the star wars game)
also stop talking about realism/it's better then cod, if we were talking about which game is better, it would have to be games that went in 2 complete directions
+.cUp ツ - Gaming Content game yeah, is for fun right, want something realistic, go outside
no bcs i would get arested for smashing a shovelwielding germans head in with my own spade they made it look realy grim in the trailerwith that tank popping up like the mamoth it was
MISTER but that's what ww1 looks like, a bizarre war zone
hassan herman
just let me cry i wanted the old tanks the realy old the ones that go about 20 km\h
This is not what WW1 was like at all it okay.....
It's just one map. There'll be more maps with naval, air, and trench warfare.
Sure, lets have a game where we sit in a water-logged trench for months, then have our feet peel off of our ankles when we try to take our boots off.
Gangrene, not even once.
+ALGaming627 do you even trench foot bro??
i like this
Please STOP! complaining about historical accuracy ofc it's not like ww1! it's battlefield man and it's
a GAME
Wow I can't wait for this game. This is the only map I've seen so far being played. Looks dark and gritty just like how'd you imagine World War. Everything from the sounds, to the visuals of these historic weapons, and locations is awesome.
where is French and Russian fraction? will not spend my 60 euro without them.
french has been confirmef as dlc
ok. will buy maybie DLC , but not sure.
only in dlc ?? damn it that make no sense ! that was one of the main army in WWI, more ,numerous that the british one ! -_-' with the german empire of course ...
IlI Shift i know right
+IlI Shift the Brits built the first tank, without it the war would've been lost. Not to mention the backup the Brits provided the French with on the western front. The help from the British commonwealth and empire was immense, without the naval fleets of the empire the war would've also been lost. The Brits helped a lot my friend and without the help from Britain the outcome of the war could've been incredibly different.
looks like star wars
Sound.
It's running on the same engine
Both games have the same amount of space battles
verdun much better than this.
Give BF3 some leeway, its an arcade shooter.
+Scientist118
I meant Battlefield 1.
+Delida Cessade Verdun is for actually fans of old fashion warfare instead of bandwagoners who think they want bf1
HAHAHAHA VERDUN
verdun atmophere like real ww1 same with red orchesta and look this video bf1 the gameplay like modern combat even take place in ww1.
everyone is complaining about the voice and I kinda like it, it's clean and simple. I also love the interface with the white and the font
So WWI battlefield 4 reskin? Any real changes?
Lol thought so too
Fully destructible battlefield, new dog fighting mechanics, zepplin, etc.
basically, it's like an upgraded reskin of bf4. I loved bf4 tho
MrEthanSimpson I don't think any of those features are worth another drop of $60+. I realize that this game was obviously not meant for me then, but I would have preferred the changed up their template a little more. Battlefield is now just as bad as COD, and this is coming form a battlefield 1942 player (which was my first battlefield game).
bye.
Where is the trench warfare? WW1 battle tactics are nothing like they are today. Soldiers were in trenches most of the time.
There is no tactics in battlefield games, it's just people sprinting around and shooting each other...this game is no different/.
if you want a realistic ww1 game play verdun
Yeah, I have Verdun.
it depends what battlefield you are fighting on. Technically in France early in the war battles were like this. Only after the german Soldiers were ordered to fortify and defend their positions did trench warfare begin.
Just without zeppelins that were actually effective.
Halo CE Magnum Battles were never like a BF game in any period throughout history, ever....apart from the unrealistic...EVERYTHING (from unrealistic health/damage models for vehicles and players, non-functioning armour, unrealistic weapon mechanics, 'balancing' changes to things like explosives...etc.etc.) another issue is players in BF have no self-preservation...they sprint around with their unlimited energy and shoot off willy nilly, hundreds of RESPAWNED players are killed within a matter of minutes...also players are confined to a very limited path with almost no ability to traverse obstacles.
BF is just another arcade shooter and BFO is just a BF4 reskin.
#RIPCOD
That HUD is so clean :) At least Diced learned from Starwars Battle Front
So what's so exciting about this game besides a setting reskin and the graphics?
the unique technology exclusive to ww1, trench warfare.. you can find exciting things here but if you're looking for this game to turn into uncharted-gearsofwar-titanfall then no, this game will remain Battlefield
wut? Don't you have a brain? This is a mayor company that made a WW1 game with great graphics and gameplay, just needs some more guns and vehicles and perfect!
seriously. I mean im a battlefield fan, but this isnt much of a change from their other games. Except now the guns are shittier and theres even less vehicles to get u around the map. Although to be fair I've always hated WW1/2 games. I just never liked using the old weaponry. When this game was announced I was a little curious but now seeing this, im gunna have to pass
How is this a reskin? You whiny kids get in the way of every new game, this game changed in almost every way, they added fully destructible maps, climate change, new weapons, new era, new vehicles, melee weapons, and what you saw here was just PRE ALPHA gameplay so imagine how good the game will be.
+bernie 25 never heard of it
you allowed to smoke there O_O ?
Snoop's allowed to smoke anywhere
dude smoked in the whitehouse lmao
Savage
The guy smokes every where he goes. don't be surpirsed
+Bocca_man_50 blunt
0:40 Wiz Khalifa playing Battlefield??
i said the same 😂😂😂😂🔥
yes him and snoop dog were playing :D
I thought I saw Tyrese in there as well lol
You can see Snoop smoking a joint
But just to remind that World War One was not just trenches by trenches. There was city lock downs, ambushes, this game is set in 1917 or 1918. Everyone is looking at a typical view of WW1 trust me guys please guys study it! Year by year in WW1 the technology would become more advanced and slightly upgraded. It's called 20th century technology and 19th century tactics.
why is it so low video quality
TH-cam still has to process. You're too early.
Its from a live stream
Just a low bit rate. Usually happens to a lot of e3 videos so they can get uploaded faster
it was to upload it fast its probably been rendered higher now
Whiskey
Tango
Foxtrot
hahahahahahaha xD snowmountain64 is in position haha
Yankee oscar lima oscar
nice
Delta Oscar Uniform Charlie Hotel Echo Bravo Alpha Golf
will there be a game mode where there isn't all that stupid UI on the screen? the blue and red squares on the players looks pretty dumb and seems like it would make it feel a lot less immersive
Hardcore
"...also i've never heard of the options menu."
Stick with CoD if you don't like it
Memphis Spotter lol i would have thought a game like cod would have a super casual mechanic like this. But the last cod i played was cod 3 so i don't know for sure. this mechanic just seams like it could ruin flanking and any sort of stealth, as you literally have a target on your head...
You can adjust the HUD in the options menu. As well as this, hardcore mode has no HUD by default
0:50 The mark 4 tank had a TOP SPEED of 4 miles per hour. It didn't even go at top speed most of the time.
I was about to comment on that... That moment at 9:42... how fast is that frigging tank going?! I know games tend to sacrifice realism for the fun of it, but that's way over the top, it looks so stupid...
It honestly isn't going that fast at all...
Snake897
Tanks didn't go fast as we have said...
WW1 Cod?! no thanks. At least Red orchestra Vietnam is released soon.
That isn't cod its battlefield
Who mans is this
jayeruptus who man is this?
the cake is a lie
like si hablas español y ves a Alexby11 [minuto 0:26]
estoy en celular
y tambien aparece vardoc y jugando con natalia
Grefg también
why have celebrities...
isn't it obvious?
Does it matter?
What...? Celebrities can't play games or...?
because they're a source of big cash or a way of making battlefield sell more, so over-all it's for the cash. yeah.
Mac screen capture sound at 13:02
This is a nice preview but I'm sick and tired of celebrities play games first when they are a small minority. Let the real people who play the games preview the game.
Are celebrities not real people? And who's to say they play these games on their free time?
they had a ton of TH-cam and general players at the the event. it wasn't only celebrities
They visibly didn't, the best scoring player of the celebs was Wiz Khalifa with a 2-11 K/D and a score of 7056, and the best K/D of the celebs was Richard Sherman with a 9-11, these weren't actual players, they were publicity
Battlefield Games are getting too hi-tech. They actually have guns and tanks!? Are you kidding me? They need a good battlefield with horses, swords and shields...
Or maybe a touch back to just rocks and slingshots... that will be a REAL game...
+FHalba Thats the joke.... >.>
I believe there are horses and swords in this game....
Two questions, why is the video quality maxed at 360p and 0:41 is that Wiz Khalifa!!
yes that is him
that is because of TH-cam still processing the video. You're basically too early.
Wiz, Snoop Dog, Zedd as well as Kesha were at the event. As well as other celeberties.
there were tons of celebrities in the teams
Wait until you see snoop dog playing while smoking a j lol
Best part is seeing the players. Burnie, Gavin, Nanners, Crews, etc. Pretty good.
This is what happens when Americans make a ww1 game, hardly very realistic, and tanks weren't that fast
The game need to be fun before being realistic. If you want a realistic ww1 game go play Verdun. It is a bore fest of trench warfare.
1. It's made in sweden, DICE Stockholm.
2. The Battlefield series hasn't been and will never be a simulator like Arma
3. Like Barney said, fun before realism.
Battlefield 1 - Trench Warfare wouldn't be very entertaining.
You do realize that Modern Tanks can go about 25mph or 40kph on surfaces other than concrete right?
It's not much of a stretch to think that WW1 Tanks could go at 16mph or or 20 kph.
+Blue Phoenix Guy 1. Modern tanks can go a lot faster than 40 and 2. The top speed of the mark 4, which was a lighter tank, was 4 mph... The top speed of the heavy tanks were around 2 mph.
lol is that wiz khalifa? 0:37
So was snoop dogg, a lot of celebrities were there
yeah i saw that lol
14:20
there is a fuckload of celebs
Zack Efron at 11:04
WHERE IS THE FRENCH ARMY ????? WTF
yeah Chinese army, Austria, Australia, poland,and Afghanistan
man if America had a dollar every time they said that...
If that was sarcasm, France really did contribute a lot in WWI, in fact it was the main battleground for the western front.
Timo the Cat what about Chinese? i heard a little about them
hassan herman China has nothing to do with WW1
I wish you could play as a commander but also be playing the game. One teammate controls the entire team. Also having the ability to request covering fire, request assistance, things like that. That's really what I wanna see.