Keep this on the down-low please - but out of all of the CB content creators, I enjoy your videos the most. Highly informative and I appreciate the time you take to test and share your observations. Kudo's!
Thanks, really appreciate it. But I do feel CB is quite limiting as a market on TH-cam, especially this season as so many players are leaving so I might look into other games
@@AlanApogee Yup, I get it and yes I agree - CB could have been a massive hit. But, I think people are getting tired of the same cycle... new units, usually op - grind them up and start all over again next season. They need "new" game modes, that uses more of a players barracks - but the only thing they seem to care about is milking their "cash cow". While every company needs to make money - I have found that companies that focus purely on making money - lose players who have trouble keeping up with the "whales" or people willing to spend a lot of money and that hurts the game. For now, I am sticking with the game because there is nothing like it and I enjoy the gameplay - but hate the company... MyGames is its own worst enemy in so many ways... :( So I can understand why most players decide to leave.
@@Kevin.Boyle007 I wouldn't say it needs more new game modes, what it really needs are premium units that serve a purpose in the game economically. Games like WOT, WarThunder, or even Star Citizen live off selling premium vehicles, star citizen for more collective purposes, and the other two for in-game economy purposes (and to also give players incentive to play 'weaker' units). What CB really needs is a different source of income so that not everything is put into one basket (season pass and season units) forcing them to do heavy hand marketing tactics like making them OP for the sake of selling units at the cost of the game.
@@AlanApogee Very good points and I agree 110%. For me as a long-time player - I have a full barracks. Free Battles does not happen enough for me to fully enjoy using my units - and plus whoever set up the times has no clue what they are doing. I would like another mode where I can use 5 units - more often. At my level, I do not care about kit loss - so it would not have to be a free battle. This is just one idea - but I like yours as well. I wish MyGames was more receptive towards its community of players.
It was an event to bug test the infinite TW theater. Basically free treaties if you finish some objectives as stated on their update/activities page in game.
I don't like ranked, or at least i thought the implementation was really bad when it first launched. Haven't played since. -Things i didn't like were the games allowing 5 man groups against 15 randoms, thats 1/3 of the team having great communication and teamwork whilst the rest had to try and keep up. I think the max group size was lowered or removed but im not sure. -Also didn't like how nothing was standardized. How can you get an accurate representation of your skill level if your gear is just straight up better than everybody else, if you have more leadership you can bring better units, if you are willing to use something like a great bombard you'd put your team in an advantageous position. -Why not give everybody that joins ranked the base blue weapon and armour, or make it the purple ones that are so hard to get as compensation for not being able to bring your own gear. -And why not allow for a free selection of any blue tier artillery, i feel like all of it is fairly good at what it is supposed to do and doesn't remove full stacks instantly. And maybe make a limit on how many artillery can be on the field at once so the attackers don't mass build mortars and shoot the 1 treb free zone the defenders have in some maps (the horrible maps being another topic which i won't go into now, nor the abuse of some units and player classes). Not sure how much of this has changed but when it released i never felt like people deserved to climb in ranked, only if you beat people that were truly equal to you should you be able to progress.
Quite alot has changed, you can have a group of up to 3 but usually that doesn't help due to communication within teams being a heavily used aspect. The attackers have one artillery while the defenders get 2 (forgot if it's the other way around because I usually only build one every game). But yes, as you mentioned, purple and orage artillery could be a problem, but the costs are what's limiting it to TW only. And for armor And leadership, I think everyone once you can comfortably play ranked, you should have at least 750 making you quite competitive. For maps, only the fair few are in the pool so that's not a big issue. The only thing that is unfair that I'm aware of is leadership doctrines because that's based off of your luck on frontier. I have 2 and use both in ranked, but some have up to 5 making them much more competitive.
And remember, the good thing about ranked is not only the rewards and the score. But the fact that it doesn't cost you unit kits so you can play asmuch as you want with a capable team and enemy to play with. That's quite a good deal if you ask me, compared to say WOT where you need to spend an endless amount of money to stay competitive, backrupting you each season.
Keep this on the down-low please - but out of all of the CB content creators, I enjoy your videos the most. Highly informative and I appreciate the time you take to test and share your observations. Kudo's!
Thanks, really appreciate it. But I do feel CB is quite limiting as a market on TH-cam, especially this season as so many players are leaving so I might look into other games
@@AlanApogee Yup, I get it and yes I agree - CB could have been a massive hit. But, I think people are getting tired of the same cycle... new units, usually op - grind them up and start all over again next season. They need "new" game modes, that uses more of a players barracks - but the only thing they seem to care about is milking their "cash cow". While every company needs to make money - I have found that companies that focus purely on making money - lose players who have trouble keeping up with the "whales" or people willing to spend a lot of money and that hurts the game. For now, I am sticking with the game because there is nothing like it and I enjoy the gameplay - but hate the company... MyGames is its own worst enemy in so many ways... :( So I can understand why most players decide to leave.
@@Kevin.Boyle007 I wouldn't say it needs more new game modes, what it really needs are premium units that serve a purpose in the game economically. Games like WOT, WarThunder, or even Star Citizen live off selling premium vehicles, star citizen for more collective purposes, and the other two for in-game economy purposes (and to also give players incentive to play 'weaker' units). What CB really needs is a different source of income so that not everything is put into one basket (season pass and season units) forcing them to do heavy hand marketing tactics like making them OP for the sake of selling units at the cost of the game.
@@AlanApogee Very good points and I agree 110%. For me as a long-time player - I have a full barracks. Free Battles does not happen enough for me to fully enjoy using my units - and plus whoever set up the times has no clue what they are doing. I would like another mode where I can use 5 units - more often. At my level, I do not care about kit loss - so it would not have to be a free battle. This is just one idea - but I like yours as well. I wish MyGames was more receptive towards its community of players.
Delicate touch from the musket 🤣🤣
love the new look
good video i need thoes units
I saw u on PTR server, what's the server for couldn't understand. It had TW going on, does it happen usually.
It was an event to bug test the infinite TW theater. Basically free treaties if you finish some objectives as stated on their update/activities page in game.
@4:01 whats the skin on the tercio's?
Something imperial, got it a season or two ago using the attrie scrap trade deal
what you think, which weapons best for season 9 ?
The usual, Maul and musket. But I'll be with my longsword, and maybe a toe in shortbow for a while
@@AlanApogee ty bro
your so good
i love your vids
I can't help but stare at your profile pic juxtaposed with your words. Somehow makes it automatically feel sad
@@AlanApogee yep
@@AlanApogee wanna play sometime?
Join the discord and ring me there
3:36-why 6 units in a swing?
So the reapers hit 3-6 units in one attack in sword mode with 6 hits being quite rare but possible. Don't know why it's six precisely though
HI ALAN
HI NINJAGUY
Reapers with flails in the intro?! Unsubscribe! xD
That was footage when the rework just came out, was the best looking clip I found even though it was not the best play
I don't like ranked, or at least i thought the implementation was really bad when it first launched. Haven't played since.
-Things i didn't like were the games allowing 5 man groups against 15 randoms, thats 1/3 of the team having great communication and teamwork whilst the rest had to try and keep up. I think the max group size was lowered or removed but im not sure.
-Also didn't like how nothing was standardized. How can you get an accurate representation of your skill level if your gear is just straight up better than everybody else, if you have more leadership you can bring better units, if you are willing to use something like a great bombard you'd put your team in an advantageous position.
-Why not give everybody that joins ranked the base blue weapon and armour, or make it the purple ones that are so hard to get as compensation for not being able to bring your own gear.
-And why not allow for a free selection of any blue tier artillery, i feel like all of it is fairly good at what it is supposed to do and doesn't remove full stacks instantly. And maybe make a limit on how many artillery can be on the field at once so the attackers don't mass build mortars and shoot the 1 treb free zone the defenders have in some maps (the horrible maps being another topic which i won't go into now, nor the abuse of some units and player classes).
Not sure how much of this has changed but when it released i never felt like people deserved to climb in ranked, only if you beat people that were truly equal to you should you be able to progress.
Quite alot has changed, you can have a group of up to 3 but usually that doesn't help due to communication within teams being a heavily used aspect. The attackers have one artillery while the defenders get 2 (forgot if it's the other way around because I usually only build one every game). But yes, as you mentioned, purple and orage artillery could be a problem, but the costs are what's limiting it to TW only. And for armor And leadership, I think everyone once you can comfortably play ranked, you should have at least 750 making you quite competitive. For maps, only the fair few are in the pool so that's not a big issue. The only thing that is unfair that I'm aware of is leadership doctrines because that's based off of your luck on frontier. I have 2 and use both in ranked, but some have up to 5 making them much more competitive.
And remember, the good thing about ranked is not only the rewards and the score. But the fact that it doesn't cost you unit kits so you can play asmuch as you want with a capable team and enemy to play with. That's quite a good deal if you ask me, compared to say WOT where you need to spend an endless amount of money to stay competitive, backrupting you each season.