Do a podcast with Dr Arsalan Khan on this topic (a Pakistani, assistant professor in the department of anthropology , university of Tennessee, Knoxville)
@@mumair5537 I tried sharing the link a few times, TH-cam policies are not letting me do so, they remove the comment. I haven't yet come across his critique on this particular topic. But his work seems interesting, he wrote a book titled "The promise of piety" in which he discussed the reasons behind the success of Tableeghi jamat (a century old movement for Islamic revival within the Muslims), he himself spent some time with the jamat in order to understand and analyze their work.
@sona-zw8us tere ancestors bhi 100 saal pehle tak yahi karte the. Age of Consent in US in 1800s - 7years😂 Similar laws in Britain. Same case with Indian society- 1883- Rabindrnath Tagore married 9yr Old Mrinalini Devi and she was pregnant when she was 11. He is still considered an intellectual and celebrated Nobel Prize winner😂
😂😂😂 he himself spent 23 years in Europe,still speaks with a British accent and still is a citizen of Netherland 😂😂😂and you are talking of gora complex 😂😂😂
@ bhai if you are not impressed you won’t be living in their country for decades,still speaking with their accent and you won’t keep their citizenship…it’s nothing but an inferiority complex…but silly audiences don’t understand the double standards…😝😝😝
No one has a gora complex, stop beleiving anything you are told. The biggest and most influential anti evolution, anti vaccine, and climate change denial movements exist in the West. If anything, people have truth complex.
@@uzairamjad8193 absolutely correct bhai..that’s the reason why so many mslm contrys are bkward and unedu…they constantly criticise everything that’s western…but in the heart every mslm craves to get citizenship in these contrys just like their idol…the Dutch citizen…😝😝😝
I was about to order this book bcs of numerous suggestions but a video came on my twitter timeline where this man Yuval Harari was openly supporting zionists and Israel. Hence proved
Qaiser sb if you want to do some thing great against theory of darwinism and evaluation, then you should go in scientific circles, collect evidence, do research on scientific and logical basis and finaly launch a book to reject all these stuff
Wo thora mushkil kaam hai. Is leye TH-cam p mic pakar k beth k Pakistan ki Ziaulhaq k time say brainwashed ki hue awam ko thora aaor brainwash karna zyada easy hai.
I am, actually on liberal spectrum, but I actually agree that Harari did some serious fan service to liberals in that book, and there could be several criticisms of his book, even by someone who is not even a scholar, it is so easy to spot. I haven't watched this video yet, but, just right off the bat.
Masha allah great qaisar bhai, love you from India. Ek request h ki agar aap har week ya monthly ek book recommend kare padhne ke liye jo deeni aur dunavi taur pe beneficial ho aur jisse padhne se intellect develop ho to ma sha allah maja aa jaye
As an Indian (a Punjabi Hindu) I am so Happy that Pakistan has Qaisar Ahemed Raja Sahab Long live Qaisar Bhai May you gain more followers amongst Muslims
@@MR.FlyingMonkey I know you got the sarcasm, that is why you came to comment here 😝 I can understand your PAIN (hidden in this comment) Go, cry in the corner,.... Pooooch!!! 😜
@@MR.FlyingMonkey You understood the sarcasm and came to comment here.... Right?? I can understand your pain (hidden in your comment 😝) 😜 Go to the corner and cry.
@@MR.FlyingMonkey Mr. Flying Donkey (BURAQ with a BURQA 🤣🤣) You understood the s.a.r.c.a.s.m and came to comment here.... Right?? I can understand your pain (hidden in your comment 😝) 😜 Go to the corner and cry.
Narayanan say Harari is a “science populist” - a “gifted storyteller” who abandons scientific facts for simple narratives. John Sexton, former student at the Committee on Social Thought, an academic body specialising in the study of philosophy and history, has summarised Sapiens as “fundamentally unserious and undeserving of the wide acclaim and attention it has been receiving”, echoing many in the scientific community.
Yesterday, teacher was show us his interview at that time was not khow bout him and when I have watched this video I understand what he was trying to spread. Our teacher said "read this book in your life it is very beneficial''
I have read this book atleast 7 times and very frankly speaking it is very easy to debunk….. it has a lot of truths in it but at the same time Yuval Noah Harari intersperses the truths with obscure fictitious statements of “trust me bro” references…..
Mr. Qaiser Ahmad Raja sir, the next big thing in Pakistan in regards to making the online space safe as well as scientific and philosophical. Insha'Allah! “There's no such thing as a philosophy-free science. ” -Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, 1995 :
main ne is kitab ka urdu tarjuma padhna shru kiya tha ye janne ke liye ki aakhir evolutionists ke dalael kya hain mager mujhe is mein daleel naam ki koi cheez dikhi hi nahien .bass aisa huwa waisa huwa .ek kahani ki tarah lagi .
@AzizKhan-yt4xc abay aisay Nahi Hota Bhai unbaised ho KR suna karo SB KO har BT engineer ki Sahi Nahi hosakti Allah Kay liya Deen sekhoo engineer Kay liya nahi
I absolutely loved the editing of this video, very high quality, I heard about this book on Bill Gates blog, when it wasn't "that" popular in our liberals. I had it in my list eversince, and I recently bought it, at least. I absolutely love attention to details in editing, whole aesthetics are incredible. I specifically appreciate it because I know, you started this series, with relatively low quality videos, I mean it was hard work, but still, compared to this. And you look healthy, mashallah. I might not comment on commentary at all, but I am super impressed, because your dedication is inspiring, I say this on human level, as someone who has hard time with consistency. I love your passion. I consider myself a liberal, but I completely agree, I can't stand arrogance of liberals at times.
I think, it was not domain of Harari to go into that depth, if it is citing reference of that one claim you care about, this book never claimed to be 100% accurate, on every subject, maybe an evolutionary biologist can explain what he meant by that. Secondly, it is amusing, you mocked at liberals, for being impressed by westerner authors, but you yourself quoted all of those authors, to make your case. Half the video was about what x thinks, what y thinks, what z thinks, all of whom being those people. But I agree, Harari, is good storyteller, he made mistakes, his book should not be studied as historical record, as liberals seem to believe. It is wishy washy, feel good kinda book.
یٰۤاَیُّهَا الَّذِیْنَ اٰمَنُوا ادْخُلُوْا فِی السِّلْمِ كَآفَّةً۪-وَ لَا تَتَّبِعُوْا خُطُوٰتِ الشَّیْطٰنِؕ-اِنَّهٗ لَكُمْ عَدُوٌّ مُّبِیْنٌ(سورۃ آل بقرہ:208) اے ایمان والو اسلام میں پورے داخل ہو اور شیطان کے قدموں پر نہ چلو بےشک وہ تمہارا کھلا دشمن ہے
Doesn't the idea of creation a few thousand years ago get disproved when we have found sekeletons of upright humonoids dating back to 100s of thousands of years, tools and weapons that they used dated even further back upto millions of years.
Who said few thosuand years ago..?? There always uncertainty on starting point of 1st human Few thousand years ago was just a random guess of some historic people But, So far archeologically speaking atleast 15000 years old civilizations & their texts have been found, For example, Sumarian civilization 15000 years old & Their quite important texts & tablets Were stolen from Iraq's museums as a 1st step, After the US invasion of Iraq
@@TheUltimateTruth381 According to Islamic Sources there are more or less 80 generations between Adam A.S and the the Last Prophet SAW. Even if you have each generation be 50 years apart it still adds up to 4000 years.
@@Servant_0f_Allah. I don't have the names of the primary sources right now but it's an undisputed thing (as far as I know) among islamic scholars of the present. People like Tariq Jameel and Haneef Qureshi will even recite to you all the names in order. Look it up.
No academic criticism. Every reader knows every book has some bias or interprets facts in ways which might not correspond to reality. Do academic criticism. Give your own assessment, prove with evidence, mere quoting people to prove it wrong is doing the same thing of which you accuse Harari.
Your criticism is rather general and does not pinpoint the exact wrongs, as you alleged, done in the book, and the only excerpt from the book that you criticized is based on a theory, which is clearly written in the excerpt itself. Your criticism is only for the sake of criticism and lacks any substance.
Raja Jee, Let me leave a quote for you to ponder. "Jack of all trades, master of none, though oftentimes better than a master of one" Sapiens is just like this.
I didn't understand much because I don't speak Urdu. It is irrelevant that Harari is Israeli. The point behind the fact that most academics and intellectuals are evolutionists is that it explain all the findings which we encounter in the fossil sphere, but it also explains the findings we encounter on the molecular level. Even if there is some criticism of evolutionism among the academics, the point is noone and I repeat noone is out there who says women came out of the rips of a man created as the first human. Harari's book is not for the science people, it is a book the general public. So, real intellectuals do not talk about Harari when they discuss evoution. There are more scientific literature which you people wouldn't even understand.
But it is dangerous video you made, you can't stop reading author, simply because of these issues. Despite of all the flaws, I still believe it is brilliant read, for people to get general idea, how it hall came about. One must however, be cautious, and not believe it is infallible. His book Nexus is pretty good too, how it connects the modern tactics employed by governments to tactics of the past. No author is perfect.
It is not an issue to read it as a science fiction and that's what qaisar is saying, but to read and consider it as a book with scientific truths is wrong whether you believe it or not.
@@CSSPMSGuidanceHubabsolutely correct these bks are fictions..you should believe only in flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants ,sun going under gods throne at night,..kind of genuine,scientifically proven facts…😂😂😂
There's no denying that Yuval Noah Harari's storytelling skills are exceptional. He masterfully leverages this talent to craft his books. However, beyond the captivating prose, some of the ideas behind those words can, at times, feel quite absurd. Thankfully Raja sir for bringing this topic on the table.
قیصر صاحب ہرارے کی کتاب پر اس کا کوئی ہم عصر متفق ہو یا نہ ہو یہ اختلاف رائے کہی جائے گی اور ہرارے کو اس باریکی میں جانے کی شاید ضرورت نہیں پڑی کہ جو انسانی فوصلز کی تاریخ سڈیز میں بتا رہی ہے۔۔۔آپ ایک مسلمان ہیں تو آپ کو اگر evolution سے اختلاف ہے یا ہرارے سے متفق نہیں ہیں تو انسان کی تخلیق پر ایک مدلل پروگرام کریں یا کتاب لکھیں تاکہ مسلمانوں میں سے ملحد نہ بن سکیں ۔ اختلاف رائے ہمیشہ سے رہا ہے اور رہے گا لیکن دلائل کے میدان میں کون زیادہ authentic بات کرتا ہے اسے عام لوگوں پر چھوڑ دیں۔
How would you justify the Abrahamic religions teachings of Adam being created from clay or mud? Also, was Adam really the first man on the planet, now we have scientific proof that he indeed was not. Sorry, there's no disrespect to the religions but I am learning and questioning. Thanks!
Main convention center ma tha wahan Big BOSS or anwar ul Haq kakar chief guest thay wahan Big BOSS na students ko kaha tha "Yuval Harrari aik bohat acha writer ha aap is ko parhain us ki aik book ha (xyz)" ab mujha yaad nahi k wo yehi book the ya koi or magar writer yehi tha.
Sir Actually you should recommend some books.If they are recommending these types of books which may create confusions,you should atleast recommend some other useful books on present issues.
Evolution has yet to explain the self-conscious mind's ability to seek knowledge and propagate it. By attributing it to a mere mutation, Harari dismisses the profound uniqueness of human cognition, like pulling the chessboard from under the pieces and declaring a draw.
totally, Brother! Academics have recognized these problems, and subsequently made some startling remarks. Biologist John Gray states; “If the human mind has evolved in obedience to the imperatives of survival, what reason is there for thinking that it can acquire knowledge of reality, when all that is required in order to reproduce the species is that its errors and illusions are not fatal? A purely-naturalistic philosophy cannot account for knowledge that we believe we possess.. ” (The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins, 2014) D.N.A. discoverer Francis Crick said, “Our highly developed brains, after all, were NOT evolved under the pressure of discovering scientific truths, but only to enable us to be clever enough to survive and leave descendants. ” (The Astonishing Hypothesis; The Scientific Search for the Soul, p. 262) The Cognitive scientist, Steven Pinker wrote, “Our brains were shaped for fitness, not for truth. Sometimes the truth is adaptive, but sometimes it is not. ” (How the Mind works, 1997, p. 305) Prof. of Philosophy Anthony O'Hear provides a similar example to show that evolution can produce false, rather than true beliefs, thereby showing that non-rational beliefs can lead to survival, more as follows; “A bird may avoid caterpillars with certain types of colouring because they're poisonous, but it shall also avoid non-poisonous caterpillars with similar colours, and may be credited with a false belief about the poisonousness of the harmless caterpillar. Of course, the survival chances of the bird are increased by its avoidance of the caterpillar type which includes, both noxious and harmless caterpillars. Having a false belief, then, about a particular caterpillar, shall be a by-product of a survival-producing disposition. Given that the harmless caterpillars have evolved through mimicry of the poisonous ones, reinforcing the general point that there's no direct way of moving from evolutionary workings to truth. ” (Beyond Evolution; Human Nature and the Limits of Evolutionary Explanation, pp. 61:62) As Ustadh Hadhrat Dr. Hamza Andreas Tzortzis sir concludes, it should be clear that the Darwinian theory of Evolution, which is geared towards Survival , not truth, is an INADEQUATE EXPLANATION of our ability to reason and desire to discover.
If we Stick to What these Atheist Proposes Universe cam on its own, First this atheist Academia was hell bent on Universe was Eternal, because if Universe started then it means Creation But then it was Proved Universe Expansion meaning it had a start By these atheist logic Universe came on its Own and then by some Natural processes Non Living Carbon becomes conscious and it started to observe In other words Non Living Universe came on its Own & Later it becomes conscious and this Universe started to Observe itself, These are Big Philosophical claims which atheist have to answer All they have Chance Chance Chance
@@BurraqAli-el1pmeasiest answer given by mulllas is…by MAGIC 😂😂😂..all problems with evolution are answered beautifully by mullahs using just one word..MAGIC 😂😂..How was universe,Adam and life created? By MAGIC 😂😂..this word puts science,scientists,philosophers,Noble prize laureates into shame 😂😂😂
I was told not to buy this book, but previous month I bought both Sapiens and Nexus and thank God I have read both of them cover to cover; both books are best and have not a single error and contradiction. I am 100% sure QAR have not read it cover to cover. Had he read it with an open mind, he would have become fan of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind and its author Yuval Noah Harari.
@@unknown77200 So many anthropologists are recommending this book. Only few have criticized a line in the whole book and here QAR is quoting them. QAR is not quoting those anthropologists who are appreciating this book. It is Qaiser Baja who is biased not Sapiens.
@@unknown77200 obviously you will find it biased towards reality,facts,evidence…you like unbiased stories of flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants etc..which are very scientific 😝😝😝
I think the Muslim scholars have written many books on history. But you have changed your mind to this materialistic approach. Here is list . Kitab al-Tarikh - Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari 2. Muqaddimah - Ibn Khaldun 3. Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh - Ibn al-Athir 4. Tarikh al-Yaqubi - Ahmad ibn Abi Yaqub al-Yaqubi 5. Tarikh al-Islam - Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi 6. Kitab al-Athar - Imam Abu Hanifa 7. Al-Bidaya wa'l-Nihaya - Ibn Kathir 8. Futuh al-Buldan - Al-Baladhuri 9. Tarikh-i-Bayhaqi - Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi 10. Tarikh-i-Tabaristan - Ibn Isfandiyar
Muslim scholars and writers have made significant contributions to various fields, including history, philosophy, science, and literature, for centuries. Talking about contemporary books like Sapiens, which have gained widespread recognition, there are several reasons why Muslim authors might not have achieved similar recognisation. Most of the time non Muslims won't read books written by muslim authors. This is due to bias against Muslims. This bias can manifest in many ways, such as media representation, discrimination, political rhetoric, social exclusion etc There are talented Muslim authors and scholars who are making valuable contributions to various fields. It's essential to recognize and celebrate their work.This will help to promote a better understanding of Islamic perspectives and contributions to global discourse. Some notable examples of Muslim authors who have gained global recognition include: The Collapse of Evolution_ by Umar Ibrahim Vadillo Evolution Deceit_ by Harun Yahya (translated by various Muslim authors): Although not exclusively written by a Muslim author, this book has been widely read and appreciated among Muslim audiences. The Miracle of Creation in DNA_ by Harun Yahya. The Quran Leads the Way to Science_ by Abdul Majeed al-Zindani. The Fall of Darwinism_ by Muhammad S. Abdel Haleem. The Quran and the Secular Mind_ by Jamal Badawi. The Atheist Delusion_ by Abdur-Raheem Green. Islam and the Secular Mind_ by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. The Collapse of Atheism_ by Umar Ibrahim Vadillo. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification of Belief in God_ by Imran Nazar Hosein. Muhammad Asad (Austrian-Pakistani diplomat, writer, and Islamic scholar) - Ali Shariati (Iranian sociologist, philosopher, and Islamic scholar) - Fatima Mernissi (Moroccan sociologist, writer, and Islamic feminist) - Mohammad Hashim Kamali (Afghan-Malaysian Islamic scholar and jurist) and many more
@@noshadar 50 million mslms ran to Europe to pursue their materialistic desires 😝😝😝 including the Dutch national who spent 23 years of his youth in Europe and now criticising the same ppl who gave him citizenship when he was desperate
Hahahha very funny guy,,,, In first reference Christopher said that fact are broadly correct and not new,, means fact are true but harari want to get credit,,,, clear And second phd psychology also said that harari is fraud. Means she also critique on harari that he carry information from others work. But fact are true,,, Understand bro 😂😂
@@Arff02 din raat gorun Secularism aur liberalism ko galiyaan dene wala khud wahan ka shehri ban ke betha hai, agar ye munafiqat aur double standard nahi hai koi mujeh koi masla nahi hai. Aur aapki andhi aqeedat se bhi mujeh koi massla nahi hai.
Every One needs fame nowadays ,so youtube is the best place to spread and create controversies and then cash on it..... Please Mr. Qaisar it is my Humble request to you kindly do some research properly and then present your argument logically ...
In "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind," Yuval Noah Harari explores various scientific concepts that are still subjects of debate or are not definitively proven. Cognitive Revolution: The exact timeline and processes involved in the Cognitive Revolution, which Harari suggests allowed Homo sapiens to outcompete other species, are debated among researchers. Myth and Shared Beliefs: Harari posits that shared myths and beliefs, such as money and nations, have enabled large-scale cooperation among humans. The interpretation and impact of these constructs are still discussed in sociology and anthropology. Agricultural Revolution: The benefits and detriments of the Agricultural Revolution are contentious. Some argue it led to a decline in health and quality of life, while others emphasize the advancements it brought. Domestication of Animals: The processes and ethics of animal domestication, including the role of humans in creating species, are still debated regarding their implications on evolution and animal welfare. Historical Accuracy: Harari's interpretations of historical events (like conquests and cultural shifts) invite scrutiny, as historical narratives can always be re-evaluated and contested based on new evidence or perspectives. The Role of Writing: Harari asserts that writing fundamentally changed human societies. The extent of this impact, especially concerning memory and oral traditions, is a topic of ongoing research. Capitalism and Economic Growth: The effects of capitalism on societal structures and the environment remain subjects of intense debate among economists and sociologists, particularly regarding inequality and sustainability. Colonialism: The justifications and consequences of colonialism are analyzed from various viewpoints. Harari highlights its role in the spread of cultures and ideas, but this perspective is contested by those who emphasize its destructive impacts. Future of Humanity and Genetic Engineering: Harari discusses the potential and ethical implications of genetic engineering and biotechnology. The long-term consequences of these technologies are uncertain, and debates about bioethics continue to evolve. Religious Beliefs and Social Cohesion: While Harari presents religion as a means of unifying large groups, the interpretations of its role and impact on society vary widely, encompassing both positive and negative views. Even Islam didn't unify the people, there is large level of sectarianism, I do not argue that there are errors in Islam, but I suggests that people didn't follow the Islam in true sense.
Author Jeremy Lent, who has written about human history, thought, and culture, points out four main “fictions” in Harari’s sweeping narratives. The first is equating all of nature to computing, a myth that originated in Europe in the 17th century. Believing that nature functions like technology leads us to seek solutions oriented around technology rather than nature, he elaborates. The second is that human systems follow “no other alternative” path, where he says that after the collapse of communism, only liberalism remains and that provides no meaningful answers to today’s problems. The third is an extension of the second, stating that life itself is meaningless and our actions are pointless. In this, Harari echoes metaphysical arguments by Asian philosophers and saints, but, as Lent points out, reduces them to “sound bites” as well as contradicts millions of years of culture. The fourth and the last is Harari’s claim that he can “actually observe reality as it is” because of his Vipassana practice, which leads him to conclude that reality itself is the perception of reality. Harari writes from a lens that claims to be scientifically objective, Lent explains, but his understanding of science revolves around the first fiction that believes nature is a machine, thus basing his entire argument on a flawed premise. In a profile of the author in The New Yorker, Harari’s former PhD adviser from Oxford guesses that he protected himself from expert criticism of the book by “asking questions so large” that no one can answer them definitively.
@@IrshadAhmad-tp7re have u ever read book by shoaib Ahmed Malik. On evolution. Go through that. U will find intresting facts. U will understand why qaiserAraja is talking against evolution. Like Millar Urey experiment failed to give same results as published by Miller. But still text books teach that. The concept of Abiogenesis and speciation from common ancestor ape. As shown in pictures give notion that evolution happed in this way. But carefully understanding the process we find alot of gaps and supports different views.
Creation talks of Special design, Everything is perfectly designed from Heart to brain & Even Universe, Just look at Human Anatomy, Creation is Metaphysical & Philosophical and we give You Philosophical Arguments But Evolution mainly Darwinism You claim is Science, & Modern science is limited To Methodological Naturalism, that everything can be explained from natural Processes and when We ask you Proof All we get is circular reasoning, Fossil-Evolution, Evolution-Fossil Just Look at this, Darwinism which Suggest Gradualism i.e Over a Long Span of Time Micro Evolution lead to Macro & One species changes into Other but it is never Observed, And Caribbean explosion Raises serious Problem for Darwinism Gradualism, because all of Sudden In Caribbean Time complex Life just emerge in 7-8M years And for your Information for evolution 8M time is like seconds, To explain This Stephen J Gould Presented Punctuated Equilibrium, I Cant Write Everything So Long story Short Science is limited to Methodological Naturalism All this is I am trying to tell You there is Critique on this Theory much more than any theory Mind, Rational All this Cant be explained By Chance which This theory suggest And when we look at our Body It doesn't Look it started from Single cell Bacteria You have to Open Your Mind For Creator and we give you Philosophical Arguments, just look at Universe how it is perfectly designed, stars In Perfect Orbits creates galaxies and these galaxies aren't Random, These Galaxies are In Perfect Order and create Clusters, and these Clusters are in Perfect Order which creates Super Clusters, Expanding force is perfectly tuned, everything is Perfectly Tuned from Universe to Your Body, This Tells Us Its not a random accident All is Perfectly designed from Your Body to Universe And this tells us There is A creator, No doubt In It, so don't be Narrow Minded Like Atheist and declare all this as a Chance
What is this ? Was it a book review ? He provided almoat no context to his negative reviews. The one passage that he read out , clearly says "we're not sure ", so what exatly is this Raja going on about ?
Insan evolution k zariye hi peda hwa ha but darwinism theory k mutabik ni... Quran me insan ki different stages bta di gai or btaa diya ha k insan ko plants ki tarhaa zameen se ugaya ha
@grizzii2149 asa kch ni likha talwar se 2 tukry kiye hon.... Albata moon split hwa tha ye bat ha it was the miracle for us. Moon splitting is not a big thing when we can have many other big incidents in Quran.
I read this book as a part of literature review for my PhD thesis on Posthumanism. Initially i was mightily impressed with the arguments put forward by Harari and honestly speaking, it influenced me a lot. However, as I read his other books viz Homo Deus, 21 Lessons for 21st Century, I began to notice a pattern in Harari's arguments. Long story short, I realised that he is trying too much and doesn't provide one particular standpoint. At times he appears to be critical of transhumanism simultaneously being a serious advocate of the same. Finally I came to the conclusion that his books are more popular than substantive like popular fiction. Everything is half baked, circumlocutary and the standpoint is at best ambivalent, hotchpotch. The only thing I could take out from Harari is that he is the influential advertisement of atheistic logic and his arguments suffer from the same old lacunae, deliberate ambiguity and downright hypocrisy. And yes, he is radically modernist and pro-transhumanist and offers cunning justifications for everything Western including Socio-economic inequality, technological elitism, etc in the garb of being critical.
Qaisar sahib, if you can create a new piece of work, then at least have some manners not to undermine the work of others. Sapiens is piece of art, which explains how humanity can work to understand its past, all theories have rights and wrong and writer did not say these are final words. So be a mature person and see litrature with intellect mind, rather then being a critic of knowing nothing. If you think you can do better, then write a similar thing to explain your theory. I had a very high respect of you, but just to get views if you are pointing fingers for academic work, you should seriously consider your position.
Raja: People with Gora complex are reading Sapien because he is Western. Then, proceeds to provide references against the book from Western scholars. On a separate note, many people have justifiably criticized Sapiens. It is a flawed book that assigns too much weight to grain's role in human social development. The good thing about the book is that it mainstreamed interest in human history beyond the dogmatic.
Lol it is true pak liberals have gora complex that is why they ignored criticism of western academics matlab kuch bhi accept karlo aur jab usi jagah se criticism aye to ignore kardo why hypocrisy over this ?
Esi book jo tree leaves pe likhi hui mili jinme se kucch leaves ko bakri kha gai......uspe bina source pe faith rakhne wala sapiens ko debunk kar rha🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣thats hilarious
@@Thinking-beyondof course they existed..there are eyewitnesses,historical evidence,archeological evidence,we know the date of creation of Adam,place where he lived ,when and where he died,which school and college he and his family members attended,fossil records,DNA samples,everything is available in museums in Karachi 😂😂😂
Just in last minute, you made mistake, The God Delusion, if you read introduction, is primarily designed to raise consciousness, just to what extent science can explain, you can quite easily invoke god after that. But our people, you have to admit, invoke god miles before that. The God Delusion is excellent book, does it contain good arguments against existence of god? No, Dawkins does terrible job at philosophical arguments, because he is not philosopher, but other than that, he does go into depth. Even in his livestreams, and debates, very seldom he dodges question. Bother to read intro to a book first, before diving in. It is also best to pair his books, with Selfish Genes, and also Outgrowing God, to get better sense, of what he is on about. I loved this video, when you instill this mindset in your followers, that x and y books are terrible, you are no different from liberals, that you so vehemently criticize.
Instead of creating trivial videos, you should focus on researching, writing, and publishing a research paper. Why waste time? Oh, it's because making videos is your primary source of income, even though it contributes to making people more dumb.
good work! excepts from the book and discussion on their logic is the proper way of critical analysis. some ancient scholar said once "what is being said is important source of knowledge and learning not who is saying it".
Greatest waste of time I ever did in my life was when I read this book
Tum zaheni bimar hu aur madarsa chhap bhi ye akkal walu ke liye hai zaker nalayk jaisu liye nahi cambu😂😂😂😂😂 me to angregi 😢😢😢😮😮😮😮😮
Toh kaun si book pasand h
@@grizzii2149 Depends upon category
@@grizzii2149 he likes bks which has stories of flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants etc…😝😝😝
@@Zulqurnain_Cheema you will like only those books which have flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants 😝😝😝 or old men plyin with bby guuurls
Do a podcast with Dr Arsalan Khan on this topic (a Pakistani, assistant professor in the department of anthropology , university of Tennessee, Knoxville)
Can u share his link of FB or any platform.is this guy is the critique of this book
@@mumair5537
I tried sharing the link a few times, TH-cam policies are not letting me do so, they remove the comment.
I haven't yet come across his critique on this particular topic. But his work seems interesting, he wrote a book titled "The promise of piety" in which he discussed the reasons behind the success of Tableeghi jamat (a century old movement for Islamic revival within the Muslims), he himself spent some time with the jamat in order to understand and analyze their work.
Aur jo muhamad be 6 sal ki bachi ke sayh shadi ki woh
@sona-zw8us tere ancestors bhi 100 saal pehle tak yahi karte the.
Age of Consent in US in 1800s - 7years😂
Similar laws in Britain.
Same case with Indian society-
1883- Rabindrnath Tagore married 9yr Old Mrinalini Devi and she was pregnant when she was 11. He is still considered an intellectual and celebrated Nobel Prize winner😂
Oh bhai maaf ker do. Get yourself some education please . It’s allowed in many of American states as well even in todays world with parents consent
People with Gora Complex are bashing Qaiser Bhai
😂😂😂 he himself spent 23 years in Europe,still speaks with a British accent and still is a citizen of Netherland 😂😂😂and you are talking of gora complex 😂😂😂
@ bhai if you are not impressed you won’t be living in their country for decades,still speaking with their accent and you won’t keep their citizenship…it’s nothing but an inferiority complex…but silly audiences don’t understand the double standards…😝😝😝
No one has a gora complex, stop beleiving anything you are told. The biggest and most influential anti evolution, anti vaccine, and climate change denial movements exist in the West. If anything, people have truth complex.
@@Hitchens-k9s imagine the level of his audience who admire this 'intellectual'
@@uzairamjad8193 absolutely correct bhai..that’s the reason why so many mslm contrys are bkward and unedu…they constantly criticise everything that’s western…but in the heart every mslm craves to get citizenship in these contrys just like their idol…the Dutch citizen…😝😝😝
I was about to order this book bcs of numerous suggestions but a video came on my twitter timeline where this man Yuval Harari was openly supporting zionists and Israel. Hence proved
Qaiser sb if you want to do some thing great against theory of darwinism and evaluation, then you should go in scientific circles, collect evidence, do research on scientific and logical basis and finaly launch a book to reject all these stuff
Evolution is truth , Aur Qaiser ko Quran ki bhi samajh nahi hai
@@QuranBibleVed evolution is fairytale with zero evidence
Wo thora mushkil kaam hai. Is leye TH-cam p mic pakar k beth k Pakistan ki Ziaulhaq k time say brainwashed ki hue awam ko thora aaor brainwash karna zyada easy hai.
@@QuranBibleVed He is not against Evolution , he is against Darwinism unscientific facts.
@@QuranBibleVedmicro evolution is truth.
No evidence for macro evolution. Just based on assumptions and inference.
I am, actually on liberal spectrum, but I actually agree that Harari did some serious fan service to liberals in that book, and there could be several criticisms of his book, even by someone who is not even a scholar, it is so easy to spot. I haven't watched this video yet, but, just right off the bat.
Masha allah great qaisar bhai, love you from India. Ek request h ki agar aap har week ya monthly ek book recommend kare padhne ke liye jo deeni aur dunavi taur pe beneficial ho aur jisse padhne se intellect develop ho to ma sha allah maja aa jaye
As an Indian (a Punjabi Hindu)
I am so Happy that Pakistan has Qaisar Ahemed Raja Sahab
Long live Qaisar Bhai
May you gain more followers amongst Muslims
@@awhig2474 "pojeet trying sarcasm still failing"
@@MR.FlyingMonkeythere are many more in Netherlands 😂😂😂…they li e in Europe and USA but want sharia in pvrty riddn bkward mslm contrys 😂😂😂
@@MR.FlyingMonkey
I know you got the sarcasm, that is why you came to comment here 😝
I can understand your PAIN (hidden in this comment)
Go, cry in the corner,.... Pooooch!!!
😜
@@MR.FlyingMonkey
You understood the sarcasm and came to comment here.... Right??
I can understand your pain (hidden in your comment 😝)
😜
Go to the corner and cry.
@@MR.FlyingMonkey
Mr. Flying Donkey (BURAQ with a BURQA 🤣🤣)
You understood the s.a.r.c.a.s.m and came to comment here.... Right??
I can understand your pain (hidden in your comment 😝)
😜
Go to the corner and cry.
Narayanan say Harari is a “science populist” - a “gifted storyteller” who abandons scientific facts for simple narratives.
John Sexton, former student at the Committee on Social Thought, an academic body specialising in the study of philosophy and history, has summarised Sapiens as “fundamentally unserious and undeserving of the wide acclaim and attention it has been receiving”, echoing many in the scientific community.
Yesterday, teacher was show us his interview at that time was not khow bout him and when I have watched this video I understand what he was trying to spread. Our teacher said "read this book in your life it is very beneficial''
Niche comments me aag lagi hay 🤣🤣🤣
Desi mulhid nightmare
😂😂😂😆😆😆
ویڈیو سے پہلے کمنٹ پڑھیں ، جب دیسی چیخیں سنے ، پتہ چلا کہ ویڈیو میں مزہ آئیگا 😂
Well, one may not agree with everything he has written in Sapiens, but I have learned a lot about human history, for which I am thankful to Harari.
I have read this book atleast 7 times and very frankly speaking it is very easy to debunk….. it has a lot of truths in it but at the same time Yuval Noah Harari intersperses the truths with obscure fictitious statements of “trust me bro” references…..
Gem of ummat qaiser ahmed raja sahab ❤
Thora aur bara khataab daikho
@epicentre1693 ya epic as you lol athiest
@@z30123 aray nae bhai kya Atheist,Tohmad mat lagao
@@epicentre1693 aap hi nae bola bhai thoda aur bada khitab dekho
@@z30123 Haqeeqat pasand hojao bhai sahab,ache bat ha,jazbati nae hona hota ha ilm ma
Mr. Qaiser Ahmad Raja sir, the next big thing in Pakistan in regards to making the online space safe as well as scientific and philosophical. Insha'Allah!
“There's no such thing as a philosophy-free science. ”
-Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, 1995 :
Raja has some serious arguments first time , agree on some points ....
This series must be continue ❤❤❤
main ne is kitab ka urdu tarjuma padhna shru kiya tha ye janne ke liye ki aakhir evolutionists ke dalael kya hain mager mujhe is mein daleel naam ki koi cheez dikhi hi nahien .bass aisa huwa waisa huwa .ek kahani ki tarah lagi .
Ap ko Urdu me Khan Sy Mili?
Bahii wo evolution ke ketab nahe history ke he
Aap apni top 10 favourite books bata dein
Prhi Hoti to wo btata bs srf kery nkalny bht Asan hy
Asalamalikum qaiser sir can you do a video of book recommendations on different topics
Jis tarah ka character ye he iss ne Ashraf Ali Thanvi ki bahishti zewer hi recommend karna hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@AzizKhan-yt4xc abay aisay Nahi Hota Bhai unbaised ho KR suna karo SB KO har BT engineer ki Sahi Nahi hosakti Allah Kay liya Deen sekhoo engineer Kay liya nahi
@hassanshakil8251 main engineer ko nahi sunta bhai..
@@AzizKhan-yt4xc so jao
I absolutely loved the editing of this video, very high quality, I heard about this book on Bill Gates blog, when it wasn't "that" popular in our liberals. I had it in my list eversince, and I recently bought it, at least. I absolutely love attention to details in editing, whole aesthetics are incredible. I specifically appreciate it because I know, you started this series, with relatively low quality videos, I mean it was hard work, but still, compared to this. And you look healthy, mashallah. I might not comment on commentary at all, but I am super impressed, because your dedication is inspiring, I say this on human level, as someone who has hard time with consistency. I love your passion. I consider myself a liberal, but I completely agree, I can't stand arrogance of liberals at times.
Assalamualayekum
Has your channel got hacked?
اللّہ آپ سے راضی اور آپ اللّہ سے راضی رہیں آمین ۔
قیصر راجہ صحابی بھی ہوگیا واہ 😂
@shahhussainkhan4613 آپ نے قول سنا ہوگا کہ اللّہ جس سے بھلائی کا ارادہ کرتا ہے اسے دین کی سمجھ عطا فرماتا ہے۔ اور یہ اللّہ کی رضا کی نشانی ہے
@ پھر بھی یہ لقب ایسے لوگوں کیلئے استعمال کرنا درست نہیں ہے
I can find many people with Gora Complex in the comments section
I think, it was not domain of Harari to go into that depth, if it is citing reference of that one claim you care about, this book never claimed to be 100% accurate, on every subject, maybe an evolutionary biologist can explain what he meant by that. Secondly, it is amusing, you mocked at liberals, for being impressed by westerner authors, but you yourself quoted all of those authors, to make your case. Half the video was about what x thinks, what y thinks, what z thinks, all of whom being those people.
But I agree, Harari, is good storyteller, he made mistakes, his book should not be studied as historical record, as liberals seem to believe. It is wishy washy, feel good kinda book.
یٰۤاَیُّهَا الَّذِیْنَ اٰمَنُوا ادْخُلُوْا فِی السِّلْمِ كَآفَّةً۪-وَ لَا تَتَّبِعُوْا خُطُوٰتِ الشَّیْطٰنِؕ-اِنَّهٗ لَكُمْ عَدُوٌّ مُّبِیْنٌ(سورۃ آل بقرہ:208)
اے ایمان والو اسلام میں پورے داخل ہو اور شیطان کے قدموں پر نہ چلو بےشک وہ تمہارا کھلا دشمن ہے
Aapki channel delete ho gai hai kya ??
❤ بڑی مشکل سے ہوتی ہے ابراہیمی نظر پیدا
Doesn't the idea of creation a few thousand years ago get disproved when we have found sekeletons of upright humonoids dating back to 100s of thousands of years, tools and weapons that they used dated even further back upto millions of years.
Not at all
Who said few thosuand years ago..??
There always uncertainty on starting point of 1st human
Few thousand years ago was just a random guess of some historic people
But,
So far archeologically speaking atleast 15000 years old civilizations & their texts have been found,
For example, Sumarian civilization 15000 years old
&
Their quite important texts & tablets
Were stolen from Iraq's museums as a 1st step,
After the US invasion of Iraq
@@TheUltimateTruth381 According to Islamic Sources there are more or less 80 generations between Adam A.S and the the Last Prophet SAW. Even if you have each generation be 50 years apart it still adds up to 4000 years.
@@Aoun-Hussain which islamic source?
@@Servant_0f_Allah. I don't have the names of the primary sources right now but it's an undisputed thing (as far as I know) among islamic scholars of the present.
People like Tariq Jameel and Haneef Qureshi will even recite to you all the names in order. Look it up.
No academic criticism. Every reader knows every book has some bias or interprets facts in ways which might not
correspond to reality. Do academic criticism. Give your own assessment, prove with evidence, mere quoting people to prove it wrong is doing the same thing of which you accuse Harari.
Your criticism is rather general and does not pinpoint the exact wrongs, as you alleged, done in the book, and the only excerpt from the book that you criticized is based on a theory, which is clearly written in the excerpt itself. Your criticism is only for the sake of criticism and lacks any substance.
But ironically you find substance in harraris book . He himself is telling and selling a story as he believes on story telling
Did you read the title of the video?
Sir New series kb sa?
Sir Jin logon nay criticize Kia wo sab bhi evolution pay believe krty hn, so are u considering evolution a fact?
No, he meant to ask how a book can be considered scientific if even evolutionists are rejecting it.
Raja Jee, Let me leave a quote for you to ponder.
"Jack of all trades, master of none, though oftentimes better than a master of one"
Sapiens is just like this.
Animals insects and birds can speak and communicate. Pls read Quran and old Torah.
trying to look smart make you look more dumb.
I didn't understand much because I don't speak Urdu. It is irrelevant that Harari is Israeli. The point behind the fact that most academics and intellectuals are evolutionists is that it explain all the findings which we encounter in the fossil sphere, but it also explains the findings we encounter on the molecular level. Even if there is some criticism of evolutionism among the academics, the point is noone and I repeat noone is out there who says women came out of the rips of a man created as the first human. Harari's book is not for the science people, it is a book the general public. So, real intellectuals do not talk about Harari when they discuss evoution. There are more scientific literature which you people wouldn't even understand.
But it is dangerous video you made, you can't stop reading author, simply because of these issues. Despite of all the flaws, I still believe it is brilliant read, for people to get general idea, how it hall came about. One must however, be cautious, and not believe it is infallible. His book Nexus is pretty good too, how it connects the modern tactics employed by governments to tactics of the past. No author is perfect.
It is not an issue to read it as a science fiction and that's what qaisar is saying, but to read and consider it as a book with scientific truths is wrong whether you believe it or not.
@@CSSPMSGuidanceHubabsolutely correct these bks are fictions..you should believe only in flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants ,sun going under gods throne at night,..kind of genuine,scientifically proven facts…😂😂😂
So exactly here is why this book does not deserve name "Sapiens".
I was on page 22. Thank you. You saved me 😅
This man has no courtesy … he even criticized Dr Abdul salam as well.. i wonder whats his qualification??
There's no denying that Yuval Noah Harari's storytelling skills are exceptional. He masterfully leverages this talent to craft his books. However, beyond the captivating prose, some of the ideas behind those words can, at times, feel quite absurd.
Thankfully Raja sir for bringing this topic on the table.
Absolutely correct…flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants ,earth created in 6 days make more sense then this silly bk called SAPEIN 😂😂😂
قیصر صاحب ہرارے کی کتاب پر اس کا کوئی ہم عصر متفق ہو یا نہ ہو یہ اختلاف رائے کہی جائے گی اور ہرارے کو اس باریکی میں جانے کی شاید ضرورت نہیں پڑی کہ جو انسانی فوصلز کی تاریخ سڈیز میں بتا رہی ہے۔۔۔آپ ایک مسلمان ہیں تو آپ کو اگر evolution سے اختلاف ہے یا ہرارے سے متفق نہیں ہیں تو انسان کی تخلیق پر ایک مدلل پروگرام کریں یا کتاب لکھیں تاکہ مسلمانوں میں سے ملحد نہ بن سکیں ۔
اختلاف رائے ہمیشہ سے رہا ہے اور رہے گا لیکن دلائل کے میدان میں کون زیادہ authentic بات کرتا ہے اسے عام لوگوں پر چھوڑ دیں۔
ان جیسے لوگوں سے اپ دلیل کی بات چھوڑے تو اچھا ہوگا
Dusron pe comment karne se pahle apni oakaat banao.. khud lande ka intlect or tanqeed dusron par...
That is why he quoted those experts that have some weight in respective field.
Why don't you follow what you have commented.
How would you justify the Abrahamic religions teachings of Adam being created from clay or mud? Also, was Adam really the first man on the planet, now we have scientific proof that he indeed was not. Sorry, there's no disrespect to the religions but I am learning and questioning. Thanks!
Do a debunking of hadiths and the 73 horee concept
Main convention center ma tha wahan Big BOSS or anwar ul Haq kakar chief guest thay wahan Big BOSS na students ko kaha tha "Yuval Harrari aik bohat acha writer ha aap is ko parhain us ki aik book ha (xyz)" ab mujha yaad nahi k wo yehi book the ya koi or magar writer yehi tha.
Big Boss Kon hai??
Qasir Ahmad raja you didn't need Nobel prize you need Oscar.
Oscar for comedy
@Humanist-o3b absolutely
Sir Actually you should recommend some books.If they are recommending these types of books which may create confusions,you should atleast recommend some other useful books on present issues.
Evolution has yet to explain the self-conscious mind's ability to seek knowledge and propagate it. By attributing it to a mere mutation, Harari dismisses the profound uniqueness of human cognition, like pulling the chessboard from under the pieces and declaring a draw.
Strongest argument of ID against Darwinism if nature is not conscious nor intelligent
totally, Brother!
Academics have recognized these problems, and subsequently made some startling remarks. Biologist John Gray states;
“If the human mind has evolved in obedience to the imperatives of survival, what reason is there for thinking that it can acquire knowledge of reality, when all that is required in order to reproduce the species is that its errors and illusions are not fatal? A purely-naturalistic philosophy cannot account for knowledge that we believe we possess.. ” (The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins, 2014)
D.N.A. discoverer Francis Crick said, “Our highly developed brains, after all, were NOT evolved under the pressure of discovering scientific truths, but only to enable us to be clever enough to survive and leave descendants. ” (The Astonishing Hypothesis; The Scientific Search for the Soul, p. 262)
The Cognitive scientist, Steven Pinker wrote, “Our brains were shaped for fitness, not for truth. Sometimes the truth is adaptive, but sometimes it is not. ” (How the Mind works, 1997, p. 305)
Prof. of Philosophy Anthony O'Hear provides a similar example to show that evolution can produce false, rather than true beliefs, thereby showing that non-rational beliefs can lead to survival, more as follows;
“A bird may avoid caterpillars with certain types of colouring because they're poisonous, but it shall also avoid non-poisonous caterpillars with similar colours, and may be credited with a false belief about the poisonousness of the harmless caterpillar. Of course, the survival chances of the bird are increased by its avoidance of the caterpillar type which includes, both noxious and harmless caterpillars. Having a false belief, then, about a particular caterpillar, shall be a by-product of a survival-producing disposition. Given that the harmless caterpillars have evolved through mimicry of the poisonous ones, reinforcing the general point that there's no direct way of moving from evolutionary workings to truth. ” (Beyond Evolution; Human Nature and the Limits of Evolutionary Explanation, pp. 61:62)
As Ustadh Hadhrat Dr. Hamza Andreas Tzortzis sir concludes, it should be clear that the Darwinian theory of Evolution, which is geared towards Survival , not truth, is an INADEQUATE EXPLANATION of our ability to reason and desire to discover.
If we Stick to What these Atheist Proposes Universe cam on its own,
First this atheist Academia was hell bent on Universe was Eternal, because if Universe started then it means Creation
But then it was Proved Universe Expansion meaning it had a start
By these atheist logic Universe came on its Own and then by some Natural processes Non Living Carbon becomes conscious and it started to observe
In other words Non Living Universe came on its Own & Later it becomes conscious and this Universe started to Observe itself, These are Big Philosophical claims which atheist have to answer
All they have Chance Chance Chance
@@BurraqAli-el1pmeasiest answer given by mulllas is…by MAGIC 😂😂😂..all problems with evolution are answered beautifully by mullahs using just one word..MAGIC 😂😂..How was universe,Adam and life created? By MAGIC 😂😂..this word puts science,scientists,philosophers,Noble prize laureates into shame 😂😂😂
Evolution wah nahi samajh skta jo hadith manta ho,
Sir " prachyam" Chanel ko zara ayna dikao sir lazmi!!!!
I was told not to buy this book, but previous month I bought both Sapiens and Nexus and thank God I have read both of them cover to cover; both books are best and have not a single error and contradiction. I am 100% sure QAR have not read it cover to cover. Had he read it with an open mind, he would have become fan of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind and its author Yuval Noah Harari.
Bro I have read it. It is enormously biased.
@@unknown77200 So many anthropologists are recommending this book. Only few have criticized a line in the whole book and here QAR is quoting them. QAR is not quoting those anthropologists who are appreciating this book. It is Qaiser Baja who is biased not Sapiens.
@@unknown77200obviously you didn’t understand that’s the reason everything will be biased if it disagrees with islm 😂😂😂
He supports the genocide of Sapiens. Israeli and honesty are the antonyms of one another. Moreover, creationism is correct.
@@unknown77200 obviously you will find it biased towards reality,facts,evidence…you like unbiased stories of flying donkey, moon splitting,talking ants etc..which are very scientific 😝😝😝
More videos on exploring such books
Why can't any Muslim high calibre s scholar or you could write such a book.
Small minds
There are plenty by muslims and non muslims. You just need to open up your eyes to see it
I think the Muslim scholars have written many books on history.
But you have changed your mind to this materialistic approach.
Here is list
. Kitab al-Tarikh - Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari
2. Muqaddimah - Ibn Khaldun
3. Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh - Ibn al-Athir
4. Tarikh al-Yaqubi - Ahmad ibn Abi Yaqub al-Yaqubi
5. Tarikh al-Islam - Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi
6. Kitab al-Athar - Imam Abu Hanifa
7. Al-Bidaya wa'l-Nihaya - Ibn Kathir
8. Futuh al-Buldan - Al-Baladhuri
9. Tarikh-i-Bayhaqi - Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi
10. Tarikh-i-Tabaristan - Ibn Isfandiyar
Muslim scholars and writers have made significant contributions to various fields, including history, philosophy, science, and literature, for centuries.
Talking about contemporary books like Sapiens, which have gained widespread recognition, there are several reasons why Muslim authors might not have achieved similar recognisation. Most of the time non Muslims won't read books written by muslim authors. This is due to bias against Muslims. This bias can manifest in many ways, such as media representation, discrimination, political rhetoric, social exclusion etc
There are talented Muslim authors and scholars who are making valuable contributions to various fields. It's essential to recognize and celebrate their work.This will help to promote a better understanding of Islamic perspectives and contributions to global discourse.
Some notable examples of Muslim authors who have gained global recognition include:
The Collapse of Evolution_ by Umar Ibrahim Vadillo
Evolution Deceit_ by Harun Yahya (translated by various Muslim authors): Although not exclusively written by a Muslim author, this book has been widely read and appreciated among Muslim audiences.
The Miracle of Creation in DNA_ by Harun Yahya.
The Quran Leads the Way to Science_ by Abdul Majeed al-Zindani.
The Fall of Darwinism_ by Muhammad S. Abdel Haleem.
The Quran and the Secular Mind_ by Jamal Badawi.
The Atheist Delusion_ by Abdur-Raheem Green.
Islam and the Secular Mind_ by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas.
The Collapse of Atheism_ by Umar Ibrahim Vadillo.
Atheism: A Philosophical Justification of Belief in God_ by Imran Nazar Hosein.
Muhammad Asad (Austrian-Pakistani diplomat, writer, and Islamic scholar)
- Ali Shariati (Iranian sociologist, philosopher, and Islamic scholar)
- Fatima Mernissi (Moroccan sociologist, writer, and Islamic feminist)
- Mohammad Hashim Kamali (Afghan-Malaysian Islamic scholar and jurist) and many more
@@noshadar 50 million mslms ran to Europe to pursue their materialistic desires 😝😝😝 including the Dutch national who spent 23 years of his youth in Europe and now criticising the same ppl who gave him citizenship when he was desperate
Hahahha very funny guy,,,,
In first reference Christopher said that fact are broadly correct and not new,, means fact are true but harari want to get credit,,,, clear
And second phd psychology also said that harari is fraud. Means she also critique on harari that he carry information from others work. But fact are true,,,
Understand bro 😂😂
I would like you to make such videos. Book reviews with critical analysis.
Gora complex ka taana dene wala khud ‘gorun’ k reference de raha hai.
Are you a patient of gora complex?
@ I am not. But a guy with fake British accent and having a secular-liberal/ atheist Netherlands nationality is definitely a patient.
@@aneessabir9073 so you have a problem with his nationality. Okay!
I thought you had some references to refute him.
@@aneessabir9073do you believe in evolution? If yes from which sources you study evolution?
@@Arff02 din raat gorun Secularism aur liberalism ko galiyaan dene wala khud wahan ka shehri ban ke betha hai, agar ye munafiqat aur double standard nahi hai koi mujeh koi masla nahi hai. Aur aapki andhi aqeedat se bhi mujeh koi massla nahi hai.
Every One needs fame nowadays ,so youtube is the best place to spread and create controversies and then cash on it..... Please Mr. Qaisar it is my Humble request to you kindly do some research properly and then present your argument logically ...
So you tell us then what is true.we can say same thing about you.
@@farihaimran1300 flying donkey,moon splitting and talking ants are the only truth…😝😝😝 evolution and science are false 😝😝😝
“Wo Israeli hy is leye kitaab ghalat hy. “
Qaiser raja 💀
Yes animals have languages
In "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind," Yuval Noah Harari explores various scientific concepts that are still subjects of debate or are not definitively proven.
Cognitive Revolution: The exact timeline and processes involved in the Cognitive Revolution, which Harari suggests allowed Homo sapiens to outcompete other species, are debated among researchers.
Myth and Shared Beliefs: Harari posits that shared myths and beliefs, such as money and nations, have enabled large-scale cooperation among humans. The interpretation and impact of these constructs are still discussed in sociology and anthropology.
Agricultural Revolution: The benefits and detriments of the Agricultural Revolution are contentious. Some argue it led to a decline in health and quality of life, while others emphasize the advancements it brought.
Domestication of Animals: The processes and ethics of animal domestication, including the role of humans in creating species, are still debated regarding their implications on evolution and animal welfare.
Historical Accuracy: Harari's interpretations of historical events (like conquests and cultural shifts) invite scrutiny, as historical narratives can always be re-evaluated and contested based on new evidence or perspectives.
The Role of Writing: Harari asserts that writing fundamentally changed human societies. The extent of this impact, especially concerning memory and oral traditions, is a topic of ongoing research.
Capitalism and Economic Growth: The effects of capitalism on societal structures and the environment remain subjects of intense debate among economists and sociologists, particularly regarding inequality and sustainability.
Colonialism: The justifications and consequences of colonialism are analyzed from various viewpoints. Harari highlights its role in the spread of cultures and ideas, but this perspective is contested by those who emphasize its destructive impacts.
Future of Humanity and Genetic Engineering: Harari discusses the potential and ethical implications of genetic engineering and biotechnology. The long-term consequences of these technologies are uncertain, and debates about bioethics continue to evolve.
Religious Beliefs and Social Cohesion: While Harari presents religion as a means of unifying large groups, the interpretations of its role and impact on society vary widely, encompassing both positive and negative views. Even Islam didn't unify the people, there is large level of sectarianism, I do not argue that there are errors in Islam, but I suggests that people didn't follow the Islam in true sense.
Author Jeremy Lent, who has written about human history, thought, and culture, points out four main “fictions” in Harari’s sweeping narratives. The first is equating all of nature to computing, a myth that originated in Europe in the 17th century. Believing that nature functions like technology leads us to seek solutions oriented around technology rather than nature, he elaborates.
The second is that human systems follow “no other alternative” path, where he says that after the collapse of communism, only liberalism remains and that provides no meaningful answers to today’s problems.
The third is an extension of the second, stating that life itself is meaningless and our actions are pointless. In this, Harari echoes metaphysical arguments by Asian philosophers and saints, but, as Lent points out, reduces them to “sound bites” as well as contradicts millions of years of culture.
The fourth and the last is Harari’s claim that he can “actually observe reality as it is” because of his Vipassana practice, which leads him to conclude that reality itself is the perception of reality. Harari writes from a lens that claims to be scientifically objective, Lent explains, but his understanding of science revolves around the first fiction that believes nature is a machine, thus basing his entire argument on a flawed premise.
In a profile of the author in The New Yorker, Harari’s former PhD adviser from Oxford guesses that he protected himself from expert criticism of the book by “asking questions so large” that no one can answer them definitively.
One with even a bit of knowledge of human physiology cannot believe in Evolution Theory as opposed to Takhlique.
All art is propaganda, but all propaganda is not art
Ap evolution K khilaf baten krte ho but Apko ye chaheye Tha K special creation K haq me evidences dete. Evolution k peechhay parre raho ge bus
Can u please discuss evolution with me. Let us begin.
@Faqr-e-Ghayoor special creation Ki bat ho rahi ha. Jo special creation K haq me Han une Apne dawa K evidences dene chaheye
@IrshadAhmad-tp7re special creation ki evidence kaha sey Dene hai. Ya b batoew. Science ka domain hi nahi hain.
@@IrshadAhmad-tp7re have u ever read book by shoaib Ahmed Malik. On evolution. Go through that. U will find intresting facts. U will understand why qaiserAraja is talking against evolution. Like Millar Urey experiment failed to give same results as published by Miller. But still text books teach that. The concept of Abiogenesis and speciation from common ancestor ape. As shown in pictures give notion that evolution happed in this way. But carefully understanding the process we find alot of gaps and supports different views.
Creation talks of Special design, Everything is perfectly designed from Heart to brain & Even Universe, Just look at Human Anatomy, Creation is Metaphysical & Philosophical and we give You Philosophical Arguments
But Evolution mainly Darwinism You claim is Science, & Modern science is limited To Methodological Naturalism, that everything can be explained from natural Processes and when We ask you Proof All we get is circular reasoning, Fossil-Evolution, Evolution-Fossil
Just Look at this, Darwinism which Suggest Gradualism i.e Over a Long Span of Time Micro Evolution lead to Macro & One species changes into Other but it is never Observed, And Caribbean explosion Raises serious Problem for Darwinism Gradualism, because all of Sudden In Caribbean Time complex Life just emerge in 7-8M years And for your Information for evolution 8M time is like seconds, To explain This Stephen J Gould Presented Punctuated Equilibrium, I Cant Write Everything So Long story Short Science is limited to Methodological Naturalism All this is I am trying to tell You there is Critique on this Theory much more than any theory
Mind, Rational All this Cant be explained By Chance which This theory suggest And when we look at our Body It doesn't Look it started from Single cell Bacteria
You have to Open Your Mind For Creator and we give you Philosophical Arguments, just look at Universe how it is perfectly designed, stars In Perfect Orbits creates galaxies and these galaxies aren't Random, These Galaxies are In Perfect Order and create Clusters, and these Clusters are in Perfect Order which creates Super Clusters, Expanding force is perfectly tuned, everything is Perfectly Tuned from Universe to Your Body, This Tells Us Its not a random accident All is Perfectly designed from Your Body to Universe And this tells us There is A creator, No doubt In It, so don't be Narrow Minded Like Atheist and declare all this as a Chance
Alright but you just shared one passage . You should share atleast 50 passages . You may not explain them rather just mention them
What is this ? Was it a book review ? He provided almoat no context to his negative reviews. The one passage that he read out , clearly says "we're not sure ", so what exatly is this Raja going on about ?
What a waste of MBs and 12 minutes
Insan evolution k zariye hi peda hwa ha but darwinism theory k mutabik ni... Quran me insan ki different stages bta di gai or btaa diya ha k insan ko plants ki tarhaa zameen se ugaya ha
Usme aisa bhi likha h kya ki chand k 2 tukde kar diye h the talwar se
@grizzii2149 asa kch ni likha talwar se 2 tukry kiye hon.... Albata moon split hwa tha ye bat ha it was the miracle for us. Moon splitting is not a big thing when we can have many other big incidents in Quran.
I read this book as a part of literature review for my PhD thesis on Posthumanism. Initially i was mightily impressed with the arguments put forward by Harari and honestly speaking, it influenced me a lot. However, as I read his other books viz Homo Deus, 21 Lessons for 21st Century, I began to notice a pattern in Harari's arguments. Long story short, I realised that he is trying too much and doesn't provide one particular standpoint. At times he appears to be critical of transhumanism simultaneously being a serious advocate of the same. Finally I came to the conclusion that his books are more popular than substantive like popular fiction. Everything is half baked, circumlocutary and the standpoint is at best ambivalent, hotchpotch. The only thing I could take out from Harari is that he is the influential advertisement of atheistic logic and his arguments suffer from the same old lacunae, deliberate ambiguity and downright hypocrisy. And yes, he is radically modernist and pro-transhumanist and offers cunning justifications for everything Western including Socio-economic inequality, technological elitism, etc in the garb of being critical.
2:38
Talking about validity? The same validity you get by looking at creationist sources to "debunk" Evolution?
Are bhai apni adam eve ki theory ka single proof bhi nahi hai
Qaiser Rajah sahab has no content of his own that's why he likes to debunk everything that goes against with his intellectual level. 😅
Professor Raja, When is your book publishing? Eagerly waiting. 🤣
Qaisar sahib, if you can create a new piece of work, then at least have some manners not to undermine the work of others. Sapiens is piece of art, which explains how humanity can work to understand its past, all theories have rights and wrong and writer did not say these are final words. So be a mature person and see litrature with intellect mind, rather then being a critic of knowing nothing. If you think you can do better, then write a similar thing to explain your theory.
I had a very high respect of you, but just to get views if you are pointing fingers for academic work, you should seriously consider your position.
Please Learn criticism from Ghamdi sb..!!
Buhut achee baat ke hain app nain 😆😆
Sir please boost your video sound
قیصر راجہ صاحب اپ لوگوں کو بیوقوف بنانا بند کر دے تو اچھا ہوگا
Qiaser kaise kisi ko murkh bnayega jab uski soch bhi waisi hi hai jaisa saamne waali ki, adhkachra wala gyaan
Raja: People with Gora complex are reading Sapien because he is Western.
Then, proceeds to provide references against the book from Western scholars.
On a separate note, many people have justifiably criticized Sapiens. It is a flawed book that assigns too much weight to grain's role in human social development. The good thing about the book is that it mainstreamed interest in human history beyond the dogmatic.
Lol it is true pak liberals have gora complex that is why they ignored criticism of western academics matlab kuch bhi accept karlo aur jab usi jagah se criticism aye to ignore kardo why hypocrisy over this ?
پہلے اپ عظمی رومی سے تو جنگ جیت لے پھر بعد میں آکر حراری کے بارے میں کچھ کہنا
سر صاحب نے عظمی رومی صاحبہ کا جواب بڑے اچھے طریقے سے دیا ہے وہ سارے رسپانسز یوٹیوب پر موجود ہیں
Bhai qaiser Raja ne abhi tk kisi se debate nhen jeeti, chahe woh awais iqbal ho ya harris sultan, inki biology ki knowledge intehai weak hai
It's on my shelf, accumulating dust... amateur tone and one-time fun read...
This book is a brilliant piece of work. Everyone must read the 📕 book !!! 🎉🎉🎉
Raja qaiser debunking sapiens 😅 How ironic
Qaiser bhai aap pehlay seekho
logon ko bewaqoof banane ki koshish mat karo ap ko sara pata hai
Argument do..... Bakwaas mat kro.... Jahil
ہم لوگوں کو قیصت راجہ جیسے لوگ بیوقوف بناتے ہیں
Esi book jo tree leaves pe likhi hui mili jinme se kucch leaves ko bakri kha gai......uspe bina source pe faith rakhne wala sapiens ko debunk kar rha🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣thats hilarious
Most awaited video thank you sir ❤️❤️
What about Stephen Hawking? Make a video on it. JazakaAllah
Just take people who are against this book and present their views for personal views.... 😂
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA raja is the most funniest character in the history of clerics of Pakistan 😂😂😂
Wonderful Qaiser Bhai...👍🏻
Allah ne Mohammed ko dhoka de diya Jahar ka bataya nahi aur Mohammed su aar ki maut mar gya
His idea of creation is much digestable. Compared to the the confused stories of adam and eve.
Probably you really don't know about adam and eve. I accept our classical molvi are wrong but it does not mean adam and eve were not existed.
@@Thinking-beyondof course they existed..there are eyewitnesses,historical evidence,archeological evidence,we know the date of creation of Adam,place where he lived ,when and where he died,which school and college he and his family members attended,fossil records,DNA samples,everything is available in museums in Karachi 😂😂😂
@@Hitchens-k9sso u r here for a joke.. haha . Thats ur only credibility and level knowledge.. thanx
@@Thinking-beyond 😝😝😝…6 billion ppl consider y’all as a jke 😝😝😝…
@@Hitchens-k9s it is just your thinking and limited knowledge 🤣🤣 I know more than you but I am not blind like you.
Just in last minute, you made mistake, The God Delusion, if you read introduction, is primarily designed to raise consciousness, just to what extent science can explain, you can quite easily invoke god after that. But our people, you have to admit, invoke god miles before that. The God Delusion is excellent book, does it contain good arguments against existence of god? No, Dawkins does terrible job at philosophical arguments, because he is not philosopher, but other than that, he does go into depth. Even in his livestreams, and debates, very seldom he dodges question. Bother to read intro to a book first, before diving in. It is also best to pair his books, with Selfish Genes, and also Outgrowing God, to get better sense, of what he is on about. I loved this video, when you instill this mindset in your followers, that x and y books are terrible, you are no different from liberals, that you so vehemently criticize.
Instead of creating trivial videos, you should focus on researching, writing, and publishing a research paper. Why waste time? Oh, it's because making videos is your primary source of income, even though it contributes to making people more dumb.
good work!
excepts from the book and discussion on their logic is the proper way of critical analysis.
some ancient scholar said once "what is being said is important source of knowledge and learning not who is saying it".
Raja is spreading ignorance.
Chalo 21st century KY 25 Saal guzar choky hain or ham jungle ke taraf ja rahy hain
Sapiens is mind blowing book
❤❤❤❤
JazakAllah❤
یقیناً قرآن کے سارے دعوے لیبارٹری میں ثابت کر کے آ رہا ہو گا یہ عظیم سائنسدان
Ohh this is the holy Bible of pseudo intellectuals
A foolish man Raja debunking 😂😂😂