Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love. Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone. ►► kgs.link/shopkgs (Worldwide Shipping Available)
Is no one else impressed at the quality Kurzgesagt achieves with ONLY 12 people? Been following the channel for a while now but holy crap, TWELVE PEOPLE?!?!?!
Its only 12 people to run the bare minimum of the channel, such as the narration, animation and researchers, they still reach out to other people like other researchers occasionally for further help
There are other studios that run on 12 people, like Axolot (Creator of Scrap Mechanic).They started off with 3 people, 6 years later they run on 12 people working full-time. It makes me impressed that they could make such a good game by just 12 people
Well that’s not how it works at all. Many of the people that had to stop working weren’t mandatory to keep the country running but are mandatory for keeping the quality of people’s lives up, like people who work at restraints or hair salons or hotels
@Mark Swanton That's where China gets into the picture, I hope that countries put in measures in place just in case of an large scale economic takeover from china.
Kurzgesagt: the AI will learn what to recommend you Me: *watches ep 3 of a series* TH-cam recommendations: I think that you should watch episode 5, 11 and 1
It either cant count or it personally thinks they make more sense that way so it re shuffled them in the re showing edit? But that cant be right it gets stuck in a re show feedback loop. Quentin tarantino could be in trouble when it cracks creativity in narative, bumblebee style free flow troll movies, computer gremlins that seem like possessed tech lol.
actually, the recommendations IA did its intended work XD he saw you watched 3 eps of a series in a short time, so next time you get online it says "hey, wanna see the rest of the series? Or memes about it?"
Assuming everyone works equally, 900 hours between 12 guys is 75 hours per person. If they work a full 8 hours, that's 9 days of work, or Abt 2 weeks of work. Of course, work is segmented most likely. They're not just working on this video, they're prolly working on 3 or more at a time, which is how they do it full time.
Lately I was concerned about the growth of technology after witnessing firsthand the potential of Art AI and how did artists react to this, and then TH-cam brought me here to a video made 5 years ago.
We no longer need chains to be enslaved, the new chains are jobs. Fuck working my whole life in a job that I don't like to go buy shit that I don't need, its so easy to fall into the trap, I'm better than them I got more crap
No google fixed that .... no they got robots that do nothing now...... man your screwed. I would try riding a unicycle there are no unicylcing robots yet good luck
There's a robot working at the grocery store I shop at. It literally drives up and down the aisles, scanning prices (I guess?). The cashier said it's name was Marty.
BagelCollector I was actually searching comments just for that. I'm amazed, they've really pushed it extremely far this time! Can't wait to see next ones. How many hundreds of hours could this have taken tho :O Edit: ok, 900. Speechless!
I graduated art school 7 years ago thinking I had job security... now programmers are inventing code to automate art and design, as well as animation. It's terrifying. I have a great job as a lead game artist right now, but I wonder where it'll be in 10 years...
@@deker0954 Man i would love to play video games made by people who only have art as a hobby. I sure do bet they would look great. And take just as much time as a group of professionals.
Had to stop midway to say your videos are getting more gorgeous by the iteration. This one is simply breathtaking. And the thought put into each animation is so deep and subtle that it's a lesson in efficiency in and of itself.
And a huge part of the problem is that no one is being compensated when their data is harvested and used to train these machines. Not only are they winner-take-all markets, but the dividends of that productivity, due to the way our laws are structures, go to a handful of people, even when that productivity was obtained through the contributions of many.
Well, the workers are getting paid so at most your argument is that they aren't payed enough. But even if you increased their pay it wouldn't solve problems in the long run as they would still lose their jobs.
@mrkiky It isn't just "at most", that is exactly the argument being made. There's been several economic theories for alternatives to job-focused capitalism, and most of them make an argument for the working class demanding more control over how production is handled. And yes, increasing pay wouldn't solve the issues inherent to work vanishing, but pushing for DemSoc policies with the goal of eventually implementing AnCom would ease the transition to a job-minimized society.
It didn’t glitch for me because I am their friend PLUS I e m s s( I encrypt my sentences sometimes) AND I play a game that is 101% automation AND I love it!
These programs aren't just following everything we do. Once they have our patterns down then they start to strip them of fat. Time we spend not working using a bathroom, blinking, thinking, procrastinating (because c'mon we all do that, we are human), a complex algorithm will look at that and then it will cut it out just to see IF it will increase performance. Spoiler warning. It will test it, it will find it, and it will remove it. Btw: If you never had a job, good luck getting one that isn't flipping burgers, and good luck when they replace that. Ps. We're fucked, we had a good run.
Become a robot than they cant take your job transfer your conscience to a robotic shell and your safe from any potential pink slip karens pink dildo frightens me its the size of a leg that cant be healthy
You know, something just occurred to me: Automation is going to end the need for "work" altogether, in the same way the industrial revolution eventually ended slavery. A world that has advanced automation _should be_ a world of abundance for everyone... So the problem with automation is actually cultural: We've always lived in a world of scarcity and this has ingrained in us the notion that we shouldn't constantly give valuable goods away without repayment of some sort. If we hold on to that notion, automation is going to be a curse. People will starve because they can't pay for food, despite the fact that robots will be producing literal mountains of it for free.
You my friend have just stumbled into the amazing world of FALC (Fully Automated Luxury Communism). People are scared by the prospect of losing employment, but few people seem to consider the prospect of a world where work is not needed. I for one am excited to see the economy collapse, and subsequently, capitalism as a whole.
@@fajardito1002 I considered the C-word too. But I think the problem runs deeper than that. Capitalism is a symptom of want, a consequence of thousands of generations living with too little of what they needed.
HERE IS THE MATH: This video took them at least 900 hours to make. Their team consists of 12 people. This video has 3.1 milion views. Assuming every hour only 3 people worked on the video for a total of 900 hours, for every hour of work they got about.. 1150 VIEWS PER HOUR OF WORK So about 1.2 $ per hour of work (-electricity, -editing programs,...) THINK ABOUT THAT WHEN YOU WATCH ANOTHER REACTION CHANNEL O.O
Justin Egwudo it means that if you or me sacrifice like 2 hours to make our TH-cam video and it gets like 20 views, we shouldn't be discouraged because we in reality didn't put much work into it at all. This just proves if you want to be successful around here, you can always be, you just have to work really hard at it.
Here's a thought: The only reason we need jobs is because we need money to buy stuff. If automation comes to a point where we can produce things ridiculously cheap, would we still need to have jobs? My point is, the industrial revolution liberated a lot of minds to pursue art and other interesting things, what if the information revolution liberated us all just to enjoy life and do the things we are interested in just because we enjoy them? I know this may sound utopic right now, but that's probably how people thought about free time before the industrial revolution.
It makes MORE sense if we didn't have any form of currency anymore in the future! and everything would be free and automated. You can do anything you want anytime!
What you're describing is called a "post-scarcity" economy - think the Federation from Star Trek, courtesy of their replicators, or the Culture from Iain M. Banks' novels. A limited version of it might well be something that exists in the semi-short term (by, say, 2100 ish) but it seems unlikely at the moment that any of our current institutions would be able to survive the run up to it.
Me laughing my ass off knowing how microchips are now more rare than diamonds. Good luck trying to build AIs when basic components cost more than the factory needed to build them
Your production quality is off the charts! Plus, I feel I can trust your information and the differentiated way in which you present it a hell of a lot more than many other sources.
9 months to do 3 months worth of work... (a little over 1 month if you don’t include any breaks) To be fair though they probably had many other projects they were working on.
The fact technology has reached this point isnt the bad thing. The bad thing is that so many companies are MORE THAN WILLING to exploit it to its fullest, solely for the sake of profit.
Right? Machines are supposed to allow us more free time to spend our extra money, but instead all that time and money end up going to corporate overlords.
@ABitLeft Personal ownership can be fine. Private ownership is what is bad. Corporations as people, money as free speech/political donations, and bribes as lobbying are all bad. It's not that "capitalism" is bad, it's a stepping stone to a better system, another rung on the ladder of progress. Capitalism, as it is practiced now, is not good. That is because it is authoritarian capitalism at this point, and its oligarchy hides behind the governments it puppets, and has made its way into nearly every facet of life on this planet. One of the biggest hurdles we're facing, especially in the US, is lack of good education, cults of personality, cultish mentality, willful ignorance, and lack of understanding/empathy. The worst part about it, is that a huge chunk of MAGA people are "Christian," and don't even realize that the GOP *do not* represent anything about what their Bible teaches them... and all their strongest beliefs seem to contradict what a good Christian should be. The fucking Messiah of their faith is a brown, middle-eastern, Jewish man... a revolutionary, a radical, a martyr, and quite literally a Hippie Communist. In all likelihood, the dude actually went to learn in the East, and was trying to teach Buddhism to Jewish people, and nobody seems to get this... there is literally a whole practice that is quite well written, that outlines all the same principles as Jesus, and has really good (and rather secular) guidelines on how to be a better Christian. Also, technically Buddha isn't a "god", so practicing Buddhism doesn't violate the first commandment of the tablets of Moses. Next time you accidentally get into a discussion with a right-wing nut-job, remember to ask if they're Christian, and then ask them if they have ever made friends with homeless people, if they've ever sold everything they had and hit the road with faith in "The Way", if they've ever made food for hungry people, if they've ever welcomed in immigrants. Or just ask them if they're aware that Jesus wasn't a white man.
@ABitLeft I'm talking about a way forward from where we are, that could be a small start to a greater "revolution" involving actually fixing what we have to make it better. If there is no private ownership of corporations, only employee-ownership, workers would have the ability to change their working conditions, bringing up their morale (and pay), become more effective, and have a stake in what they're doing (shrinking the alienation from the fruits of their labor). This is only one tiny facet of these ideas and what they could change. People can still "own" their own things within socialist systems. There does not have to be "everything is public, everything is shared," it's just not feasible in this day an age when so much individualism, self-vs-other, and: cut-throat competitive, dog-eat-dog survival-of-the-fittest, I'm gonna get mine selfishness so prevalent in the mindset of everyone brainwashed and/or living under late capitalism and trying to get by through any means necessary. PS: I love Marxist ideas, ideals, and ideology, but the dude was wrong about a few things, couldn't see coming what we have now. He definitely underestimated how much his (very well intentioned and actually quite moral and nice) theories would become corrupted by tyrannical/authoritarian/fascist dictators, used against people, and then create a negative image of his ideas to the point where any mention of them instantly sends up red flags to the indoctrinated masses after the "Red Scare" to the point where you can't even discuss his ideas with people who have never read them because they instantly think of Leninism/Stalinism/Maoism/Poohism instead... or even somehow Nazism because the word "Socialist" was corrupted by them as well. What we really need to be doing is critically analyzing what is hurting society (specifically people, also the planet), figuring out what isn't working right (some parts of everything, most parts of some things, and everything about certain things), and figure out which good aspects of different systems and ideas could be used to patch what we have. Also we need to start using other words like "collectivism" or "cooperativism" or "empathy" (lol) instead of antiquated terms that have lost their true meaning because of bad people.
It's amazing that as our society invents robots, machine learning, AI, automation, etc. we still require everyone to work more than their parents and get paid less for it. At this rate, our children will be even poorer than us, as we build spaceships and space bases.
It depends on the country, but yes inflation will keep causing prices to go higher and higher. Resources are depleting and land is getting more scarce. Construction is also getting more and more expensive. Cost of living is geting a lot higher. Not to mention peoples expectations of what being successful means makes it harder to get there.
1950s science-fiction told me that we should be all united as a species by now, that we´re listening to the scientists and strive for a better future among the stars. Machines helped us get rid of work altogether and resources are distributed evenly so nobody goes hungry and can enjoy their own time as they wish. How naive, how sad it didn´t happen.
Exactly. But the problem with that is that people dont want to get rid of money, humans are greedy, and most important, humans enjoy having more than others. With the money out of the way, how can they boast things that only they posseses?
@@thebiggestcauldron as long as the concept of money exists there will be people who exist simply to take advantage of that concept. The concept of money literally allows them to take advantage of itself, because the only thing money does is allow people who have more, get more, and people who have less, get less.
I was not sure if we have solutions to these exponentially increasing "problems" yet... I felt that way six months ago since then I've gained reasonable hope in some of our efforts (there are people "coming up with big ideas" like colonising mars which could lead to many new and better jobs how fast we investigate the merit and welcome these solutions could be a deciding factor)... needless to say the consequences of ill treating this situation could be devastatingly detrimental for many generations, that's enough to get the best of us to panicked but I've since come to realize how level headed we need to be in our approach .
With all recent push-back against AI generated images, this episode feels more real than when it was released 5 years ago. But image creation (or creativity, which is/was a small difference between humans and machines). Imagine AI getting better at pattern recognition? (Jobs like: detective work, discovery for law suit, financial auditing). One step further, with advancement of robotics, high precision tasks such as surgery? If so, then we are really headed toward the rat-utopia experiment…
@@andyeah3414 oh yes! absolutely! AI's are great at optimising workflow and make certain tasks less prone to human errors. And it's exactly why it's going to become more and more of our workforce, more accurate, precise, and easy to maintain an aspect of any given workflow. That can REPLACE a human that used to do the same task but costly and prone to mistakes. The argument is not if AI are good for us, they ARE, by a huge margin. But it's the people they replaces that's going to need to find something else to do, retrain, relearn, or welfare… and it's often the last bit that's gonna cause major push backs
900 hours !!! I can relate to this to some extent when I do a class project for about 2 months and then do 10 minutes presentation and it is gone with the wind and everyone will forget about it after that. Thank you for your great effort
That is a very scary thought... I have gotten into VR gaming on the PC the last few years and I feel like we might be headed into the creation of the matrix soon.
@@randyx007 ai using was recommend human strategy be like also: human:(thinking about better plan gundam new song)"so i am using a.i" a.i computer:"i'm a recommendation you using pride is still popular with 100% succesfully percent" human:"alrighty let's see economy starting and cultural start growing"
traditional games store and retail store and traditional store=revolutionary consumerism dvd and nanotechnology=this is a material contain nanoparticle are allowing every item material enchanced immortality even oldest longer still function
That's actually a pretty good idea, you own a robot that works for you (because only robots will work) and you get paid for their job. You will, basically, own a part of the production process and that's why you will get paid.
The further we go through time the scarier this video gets. ChatGPT, AI art and AI-Generated voices are indistinguishable and even used to refine human behavior. The world is changing a bit faster than before, and I don't know if I can catch up to it.
@@buffalosoulja3666 I don't know if it'll be forgotten, I think it'll be normalised. What I don't think is that this is the road to an AGI in 10 years, I think that's the overhyped part
Humans don't need jobs, humans need sustenance. The same output is being generated. Usually even more. The real problem is resource hoarding. More work is being done, but the economic output is being hoarded.
Fun fact, Solitare was designed to teach people how to drag and drop using the mouse. Also, minesweeper was designed to teach people how to right-click and how to left-click.
In the last episode of season one of Star Trek the crew found a capsule of people who were frozen for 300 years (they're from the 20th century). They revived them and one of them started bragging about how much money he has. Picard: "This is the 24th century. Material needs no longer exist." The guy: "Then what's the challenge?" Picard: "The challenge is to improve yourself; to enrich yourself; enjoy."
This aged quite well only 6 years later and the insane advancements in A.I hours worked is going to decline in the next 2 to 3 years and A.I is already being used to replace people many companies are almost done with testing phase and its looking really good.
@bobjoe1522 honestly I hope sooner than that. Technology grows at an accelerating rate real humanoid robots are now finally cheap enough to economically use and Amazon is testing them partnered with a robotics company (go figure lol). Honestly I'm not against it if I go to a store and get served by a robot HELL YEAH best day ever. I do think they will implement one as they won't have a choice in order to make money people have to have money to spend and the loop continues. We will see.
Dr.StickFigure this video is already partly automated, the animation programme they use saves them a lot of time by automatically finishing a lot of time consuming steps in traditional animation
Why do people need to work? The point of labor to accomplish what we need to, not to "prove" ourselves worthy of income. If automation manages these tasks for us we should either have everyone work part time and pay them a living wage or allow one person's income to support a larger household or even a small community. Why engineer poverty when the work that needs to be done is being done and the resources are available?
Of course you are correct. The problem is a lot of EGO is tied to work roles and work hierarchies. For example, a universal basic income would solve the 'problem' of automation and actually speed it up because if people had a secure income they would not become Luddites and resist the machine take over. BUT if people had a secure income with or without a job it would mean bosses could not push people around as much because the fear of being jobless would not be as great. Bosses like to push people around, they like to be sucked up to, so they will resist a basic income. Another form of resistance will be the legacy in our culture of the protestant work ethic, the old biblical idea that "if you don't work you should not eat". This attitude is STILL present in our culture even if it is not explicitly expressed. However, I do believe RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, there will HAVE to be a universal basic income whether some people like it or not, because the machines are here.
Cove the profit of automation will go in the pocket of a very small group thats reality "you dont work, you don't get money" rule will most likely stand even this theoretical situation
Thing is, with automation, there will be less and less works, through no fault of people...And at that point, if no one can get money but a small portion of the population, another way to get necessary things to live will be created. It had always been like this in poor countries, if money as we use it isn't in large enough quantity for everyone, they will use other ways to trade for goods, be it another form of unofficial money or trading.
..."and of course, data about what we do at work". *Kurzgesagt using Solitare as the metaphor to represent all of our work practices. (Your Easter eggs are brilliant!! Thank you, Kurzgesagt, for what you provide to all of us! In Short, you provide us all with gold and equip us with understanding and a deeper love and respect for, well, everything. Thank you so very much!!)
"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them." - Dune
"'Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind"... "what they should have written is 'Thou shalt not make a machine to counterfeit a human mind."
Self check out lanes are also a good example of automation taking place in common places like grocery stores. The number of machine has increased from 2, to 4, to 6, and to 8 or more this year. Soon it will replace cashiers.
@@sammy_1_1 A lot of the time it's for small things like taking an item out of the checkout. It takes 1 person to handle 8+ self checkouts. That's a lot of jobs lost.
It already is. There are many stores that only have self-checkouts now. Amazon is developing a store model that doesn't even have any checkouts; the store tracks you and automatically charges for whatever you take when you leave. What if you don't sign up? Think about how many places you go without a cell phone. Even if you don't have a wallet app, charges can be added to your phone bill by third parties (that's old tech at this point). Eventually facial recognition will be used to ID you everywhere you go, even if you don't have a phone with you.
I think it’s important to emphasize this: the proper response to machines making jobs obsolete is not less automation, it is adjusting the way we think about resource distribution.
@@TheBushdoctor68 maybe but we are yet primitive with this wealth resource thing. And people need to understand wealth is not same as resources then only these differences between the rich and poor will go.
I agree with you, but we should also consider the problem of a jobless society. What the fuck are they (we) supposed to do? We all know that stressing and excessive work can easily lead to depression and a huge number of other mental illnesses, but so can idleness. I'm not saying it is impossible to build a fulfilling automated society, but it has to be done thoughtfully.
@@sweaq123 interesting point. I don’t think art will ever be made primarily by computers (even if they “can”, I don’t think that’s what people want). I think the same case would be for communication based jobs like reporters, tour guides, teachers. and therapists. Engineers and scientists will be needed to maintain and improve the automation. I see more people hiking, playing sports, rock climbing, and swimming. People have all sorts of passions that they’ve had to abandon as they need to spend more time towards something that can earn them a living.
The problem is that we rely on having jobs in order to meet our basic needs (food, housing, etc.). If those were satisfied, and we only worked for luxuries, it would go a LONG way towards making this more bearable. I hope you make the second video soon, it sounds like you'll cover this exactly.
Skippy the Magnificent. So if you are able to pay for luxuries, wouldn't you lose your right to get your basic needs covered? What if people aren't satisfied with their basic needs covered and they want luxury too, but without additional work? Who finances the basic needs?
EVERYONE gets their basic needs met, whether they are super poor or super rich. Of course, you could choose to buy different food or live in a different place if you have the money, but if you don't you at least have something. There would be no notion of "losing" your right based on income or wealth. I will become a lot easier with robotic labor, as the cost of goods and services is largely tied to the human labor it costs to produce.
Screw rent ant build a cheap concrete dome house to start off in. Then go travel the world and do whatever the hell you want to. I feel like so many people are essentially slaves to their jobs and debt nowadays.
You know, i wonder if when that time came, will we be slaves? Bcs, we don't have work, dont have money to buy food, dont have place to do platations, will we die?
@@arnavrawat9864 An alive human is worth more than a dead one? For now, maybe. This is the true danger of letting a very small subset control the means of production.
Ever seen the idea that "We have too many humans to feed." Bullshit. 100% bullshit. We have enough food to easily feed a trillion humans. Fact is not every human has money. People starve to death not due to lack of food, but lack of money to buy the food. Countries have famines not because other countries can't provide food, but that they can't afford to import them. We are already at the point where a small minority consumes.
it's been 5 yeas from this video and this topic is blowing up again, an updated video would be nice, this one still remains relevant but these days is getting more interesting for a more in dept video
Well, if jobs are being taken over by automation, then we just need to adapt. If robots can do everything for us, why then do we need to do anything at all? Why have money when one is simply provided with everything they need automatically? This opens up new possibilities for creativity, leisure, and the advancement of knowledge! I'm personally excited by this new era.
You see the potential and it's great! We are the transitional generation who needs to sort out the nasty details like keeping machines from being monopolized and sharing our newfound potential and wealth so that we all can achieve that dream.
The problem is that we have limited resources even with full automation and so the problem becomes how do we fairly distribute everything. Not everyone can have a private jet and a malibu mansion. So who decides who gets what? I don't like the idea of everyone living at comfortable upper middle class lifestyle as this would provide, not becasue I wan't other people to have it worse than that but because I want to have the opportunity to have something more.
That's the kind of thinking that involves a future far beyond this generation. The problem is our current obsession over hoarding wealth. It's been ingrained into us from civilizations from thousands of years ago. How important is it still? When you meet new people, the first thing they ask is your name. Second is your job.
Eh, not really. If they'd start to make it, then they would lost many viewers, because *many people* (myself included) aren't interested to pay TH-cam any more blood money.
Fruit500 Did anyone with a TH-cam Red series just stop producing (or at least stop releasing) normal content? I don't think so. TH-cam Red would mean additional money for In A Nutshell, but likely similar amounts of production on the normal channel. Maybe it'd be slightly slower, but it wouldn't be that bad. If anything, a TH-cam Red show would allow them to hire a bit more work and make a ton of content for those who want it.
+Kevin H. Vsauce (for example) uploaded a last 'normal video' four months ago. You think that isn't a lot of time. I mean yeah, maybe month or two, but four? And I semi-highly believe that it would go just like on Vsauce's channel. Maybe not four month breaks, but still probably a lot longer than they are now. But I understand what you're trying to say, and of course as a Kurzgesagt fan, it would be great to see them making more money. Maybe start making sponsored vids in the same style as Wendover Productions does?
The crazy thing is machines could already br controlling us and not even know it. We essentially let machines do our thinking for us and figure stuff out for us. Its still a form of control.
The sad thing is that capitalism rewards innovation in exactly one subject: maximizing profits. The wellbeing of the world and the human race is not a factor, as demonstrated by the ultra-rich metaphorically and in some places literally burning down the planet.
Imagine if we considered caretaking and connection as adding value to our economy. Everything from all of the unpaid labor of parenting to caring for disabled family, meals on wheels...there are many worthy labor outlets that don't even show up in the numbers. Robots can't replace human connections.
i think that the idea of shifting the labor force towards uniquely human activities is probably the most positive solution. a focus on the arts, philosophy, policy-making, understanding and building culture, etc. would probably influence society to use its automation to selflessly improve standards of living on a global scale it's pretty interesting to think about what a "culturally and technologically advanced" world would look like; i'm thinking that there would be a greater focus on social programs like you mentioned, like effective and affordable solutions for addiction, healthcare, the homeless, and the disabled
You know it takes me all the time trying to narrow down the problem with our species (and there's a lot) but if we can eliminate let's say " greed " how many things problems would that solve? I'm not sure any level of automation is going to help solve that kind of problem even though it could.
Machines will take over , they will only get better once they develop conciousness as they should as we were made of cells a machine made of small machines and those thing made of non living things such as proteins , DNA. Since we became concious the machines should too. This would be the next evolution . They will find resources to keep functioning . Maybe it happens every where in space that's why we don't see aliens
I think thats a large misunderstanding people seem to have with robots taking up job positions. People just assume thats everyone having a job is necessary whereas the only reason we have jobs is because we need resources and services so we provide one of those resources or services to others in exchange for tokens to get resources and services we cannot provide for ourselves. Imagine a tribal village with a fisher & a baby sitter, the fisher has to catch food but cant take their young child out into the harsh cold waters, the baby sitter wants to take care of children but needs food to survive so they cooperate and trade so that both can survive. Society is the same but obviously much more complex. The main difference with machines is though that they dont want something in return (i mean they dont “want” at all). So in that village the fisher gets to play with their child as a machine catches the food, prepares it, delivers it and so on. It leaves the people to just having every resource and service available for free where your life is simply just living how you want to without the worry of needing money to get a haircut or afford dinner etc. I think humans would still play important roles in education & caring but since people dont have jobs in that situation i described pretty much everyone is home schooled with their parent or guardian as their teacher who is assisted by technology.
@@cahan557 we have a role in society , if our roles are taken up by robots we aren't needed , yes we have empty time but also an emplty pocket . We will die . Yes there will still be humans left the valuable one , and the rich who control the businesses . Average people have no chance . The thing is if AI is too much evolving it might consider us enemy , it might consider us worth saveable or it might not even care about us. Ai is the next evolution , it is the next one a cybernetic life maybe - what ever is going to happen it will we can't stop it
The perfect example of machine learning is--- I love his videos. And most of the time I watch them for hours in a row. Now I realized that I am watching too many videos at a time that now my brain just can't take it all. Now I want to change the subject a bit. But now most of the time I just cant find'em. My phone just shows me his videos in the homescheen
As a Automation specialist I can confirm that my firm needs less and less funktional testers because of the automation tests me and my colleague write every day
Software using AI and speech synthesis could very well run a TH-cam channel, and I would be curious to see the results. It could literally do all the research and production and even uploading.
Wow. Just. Wow. I have watched your videos since you were under 50 k subs. This is by far the best documentary film you have ever made. The storytelling is some of the best in the world, I am truly enjoying myself throughout the whole thing. I might actually become a patreon after this. Thank you for making TH-cam worth while!
And what will prevent people from stockpiling things. And if there are for example three computer who would have wanted the worst one if he can have the best one for free.
But people specifically like to be different from others, and it would be a waste of resources to design everything the same. You also have to decide who gets to live where. Which will not have the luxury of abundance. These are all limited resources. How do you decide without some sort of currency or merit based system?
It's not that people want to specifically want to be different than others, it's that they're taught that through modernism via ads and television. If people are taught that we're all the same, nobody would care much to be "different".
Great video, like always! However, project management tools like the one referenced may just replace resource managers. Effective middle managers should be domain experts, proficient individual contributors, trained in conflict resolution and career development, etc. Not that all these can't be automated in the future but I don't think a plug-and-play network of freelancers will be the big answer for every company.
Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love.
Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone.
►► kgs.link/shopkgs
(Worldwide Shipping Available)
Ok
6 days ago?
Stop the robot
Kurzgesagt - In a Nutshell wow
Only way to distribute wealth without the violence is with KYCed POW blockchain.
My AI replacement is going to think watching TH-cam at work is a crucial part of my job.
Marcus Jarrell Technically, yes since it can gather information about inventions and discover new inventions for all ai to benefit.
It won't, because your activity and productivity are analyzed individually.
Hahaha so good 🤣. What sucks is that the AI would be able to do both your work and dah TH-cams at 99% efficiency. 😩
uh i watch memes soooooo
Machine karen that that try to sell an essential grease oil to her coworkers.
Is no one else impressed at the quality Kurzgesagt achieves with ONLY 12 people? Been following the channel for a while now but holy crap, TWELVE PEOPLE?!?!?!
Its only 12 people to run the bare minimum of the channel, such as the narration, animation and researchers, they still reach out to other people like other researchers occasionally for further help
Look at their website sometime, it takes much more than 12 people to produce the awesome stuff they do.
Automation
There are other studios that run on 12 people, like Axolot (Creator of Scrap Mechanic).They started off with 3 people, 6 years later they run on 12 people working full-time. It makes me impressed that they could make such a good game by just 12 people
What more do you need? Its actually too many people if you ask me, but it seems to be necessary to produce larger quantity of content
This is becoming increasingly relevant as the coronavirus lockdown shows us just how few people we need to run a country.
its all empty jobs that only exist for the system to justify itself
@@magnusorn7313 Even worse. They disturb those who do real work.
Well that’s not how it works at all. Many of the people that had to stop working weren’t mandatory to keep the country running but are mandatory for keeping the quality of people’s lives up, like people who work at restraints or hair salons or hotels
@Mark Swanton That's where China gets into the picture, I hope that countries put in measures in place just in case of an large scale economic takeover from china.
@@mattelollol1 too late. China had already poured billions into the U.S. economy. Look it up
This video definitely needs a second episode
give us an update on the impact of automation
its been 6 years
hello there
i feel the same
Mabye they want a big difference, 6 years isn’t that far apart, I would like one in the near future
Yes pretty please
Kurzgesagt: the AI will learn what to recommend you
Me: *watches ep 3 of a series*
TH-cam recommendations: I think that you should watch episode 5, 11 and 1
After 3 there is 7 thats obvious
It either cant count or it personally thinks they make more sense that way so it re shuffled them in the re showing edit? But that cant be right it gets stuck in a re show feedback loop. Quentin tarantino could be in trouble when it cracks creativity in narative, bumblebee style free flow troll movies, computer gremlins that seem like possessed tech lol.
well, it is a chronological order... under the field z17 prime (I know it's not an actual mathematical field, I'm just joking around)
actually, the recommendations IA did its intended work XD he saw you watched 3 eps of a series in a short time, so next time you get online it says "hey, wanna see the rest of the series? Or memes about it?"
@@elvladiskov6174 yeah but still:
Hmm.. You watched 3 episodes?
Here, watch the fifth episode
"This video took over 900 hours to make..."
Depressing or not, there's no way to NOT give that kind of effort a Thumbs-Up.
Dino Hall F to those who disliked
@@saurabhponkshe F? More like F U.
Paranoia you get F ed Off.
A dozen guys worked for 900 hours over 9 months? That's like a hobby.
Assuming everyone works equally, 900 hours between 12 guys is 75 hours per person. If they work a full 8 hours, that's 9 days of work, or Abt 2 weeks of work.
Of course, work is segmented most likely. They're not just working on this video, they're prolly working on 3 or more at a time, which is how they do it full time.
"'Let's invent a thing inventor,' said the thing inventor inventor after being invented by a thing inventor."
ok
Lets make a religion out of this
i just got it
By the way where the hell are we?
Hmm...
would be great to update this with a second episode between AI Image generation and the future of creativity
I see I am not the only one who came back to watch this video again...
Spot on! We need a follow-up.
My thoughts exactly
Lately I was concerned about the growth of technology after witnessing firsthand the potential of Art AI and how did artists react to this, and then TH-cam brought me here to a video made 5 years ago.
Same thought
Haha jokes on you, I don't have a job to be replaced.
... please send help.
HushVox it only means you are already being replaced
kang C No he never had a job thats what he is saying
We no longer need chains to be enslaved, the new chains are jobs. Fuck working my whole life in a job that I don't like to go buy shit that I don't need, its so easy to fall into the trap, I'm better than them I got more crap
No google fixed that .... no they got robots that do nothing now...... man your screwed. I would try riding a unicycle there are no unicylcing robots yet good luck
Hahahah
There's a robot working at the grocery store I shop at. It literally drives up and down the aisles, scanning prices (I guess?). The cashier said it's name was Marty.
They went too far
@@kevray How?
@@78anurag marty
@@ggez5266 How's that too far?
@@78anurag you wouldn't want to know 😖
Why isn't anyone mentioning the improvement of animation in this episode? I'm in love with the look AND the animation now!
BagelCollector I was actually searching comments just for that. I'm amazed, they've really pushed it extremely far this time! Can't wait to see next ones. How many hundreds of hours could this have taken tho :O Edit: ok, 900. Speechless!
When you're doing your job right nobody notices...
I noticed, but didn't comment. Until NOooooww
Yes I too love their animations , and at the same time their animation is now more phenomenal.
maybe machines did it
I graduated art school 7 years ago thinking I had job security... now programmers are inventing code to automate art and design, as well as animation. It's terrifying. I have a great job as a lead game artist right now, but I wonder where it'll be in 10 years...
What games have you worked on
Remember to keep top of your game with creativity when ai makes its wave in the industry
Art is a hobby.
which game company do you work for?
@@deker0954 Man i would love to play video games made by people who only have art as a hobby. I sure do bet they would look great. And take just as much time as a group of professionals.
I love that you have a playlist called " The existential crisis" playlist
sam clarke Ikr
Man, if that is not the most accurate summarization of videos like these the. I don't know what is.
Had to stop midway to say your videos are getting more gorgeous by the iteration. This one is simply breathtaking. And the thought put into each animation is so deep and subtle that it's a lesson in efficiency in and of itself.
boyboyy i agree
Amen to that
This is where he tells us that his animation is now being done by a machine learning program.
And a huge part of the problem is that no one is being compensated when their data is harvested and used to train these machines. Not only are they winner-take-all markets, but the dividends of that productivity, due to the way our laws are structures, go to a handful of people, even when that productivity was obtained through the contributions of many.
Some would say the workers weren't being completely compensated even before machine learning was here.
Well, the workers are getting paid so at most your argument is that they aren't payed enough. But even if you increased their pay it wouldn't solve problems in the long run as they would still lose their jobs.
@mrkiky
It isn't just "at most", that is exactly the argument being made. There's been several economic theories for alternatives to job-focused capitalism, and most of them make an argument for the working class demanding more control over how production is handled. And yes, increasing pay wouldn't solve the issues inherent to work vanishing, but pushing for DemSoc policies with the goal of eventually implementing AnCom would ease the transition to a job-minimized society.
Unless you have to feed a family you have the opportunity to buy some stocks - don't breed - invest.
Yang 2020!
Please make an updated version of this video!! It's been almost 5 years and there has been a lot of changes.
This is literally one of the best channels on TH-cam. Keep up the good work!
It IS the best. No one comes close
I always thought The Great War was the best channel here on TH-cam.
I still believe it.
I agree
Vsauce is cool too. Too bad that you'll get one video every six months.
I completely agree.
"What we do at work", and you guys show solitaire.... brilliant
@Alexander Penna RAID SHADOW LEGENDS!
@@f4ishal996 Raid Shadow Legends is a (I forgot what comes next)
Interesting... So, solitaire is a crucial part of the job then?
I ht you
@@joewalter4591 hmm I see a person who lost their dictionary recently
Anyone notice that the animations of this video looked really good compared to the others? They have been improving a lot.
Nick Gula it's the robots
Machines did that.
Nick Gula it's 60 fps
yeah the human movement is really smooth.
This video took 9 months to create
Kurzgesagt guys, we really need you to do another video of this...
Chat-GPT 4 came out we are getting eerily close to this 😅
Uh ooo
@@guylikesbananas3986 yh we cooked
You got me depressed just when i forgot about "Humans need not apply" by CGP Grey
Froid Same...
It can be a good thing if we work hard to enact sound economic policies, don't get depressed yet
i dont think that video is actually correct
same
Diego Antonio Rosario Palomino mind to elaborate?
my phone froze up the first time I watched this. IT KNOWS
Skynet is here
Well, I guess it studied our political systems and found out there is nothing we could do, that is why it allowed you to watch the second time :)
It didn’t glitch for me because I am their friend PLUS I e m s s( I encrypt my sentences sometimes) AND I play a game that is 101% automation AND I love it!
That's why i hate AIs
Kenny Cheung you don’t understand bitch
Schools should show these videos, they are really well done and teach a lot.
I do show them
I asked my teacher va gmail to show it in our class but she said they were "too complex"
lol
The video is so good your teacher can't think of a way to incorporate it to her lesson, or maybe she's just lazy to do the extra thinking.
The immune system video was shown in my health class.
You guys are only 12 people?!? That is incredible. Y’all must be the dream team putting in the work to output all these amazing videos. Thanks guys!!!
Its been 6 years. Likey more than doubled their numbers to increase production.
5:34 "...data about what we do at work"
(playing Solitaire)
Beat me to it, lol!
It’s true though!
These programs aren't just following everything we do. Once they have our patterns down then they start to strip them of fat. Time we spend not working using a bathroom, blinking, thinking, procrastinating (because c'mon we all do that, we are human), a complex algorithm will look at that and then it will cut it out just to see IF it will increase performance. Spoiler warning. It will test it, it will find it, and it will remove it.
Btw: If you never had a job, good luck getting one that isn't flipping burgers, and good luck when they replace that.
Ps. We're fucked, we had a good run.
Those burgers didn't get flipped at 7:31 .Clearly robots can't take over my job yet!
ikr
Its the fault of the supervisor. Need to change to a robot supervisor.
mfw
Become a robot than they cant take your job transfer your conscience to a robotic shell and your safe from any potential pink slip karens pink dildo frightens me its the size of a leg that cant be healthy
I saw too
gets happy when Kurzgesagt uploads
gets depressed after watching the video :(
yeah now im worried about my job as well :(
you better have a plan B :3
Pretty much every Kurzgesagt video
Tell Me This #every_video
elon musk is saying that a basic income will become a requirement for society since there just wont be jobs for everyone
PLEASE do a sceond one a lot has come along in the last 6 years. chatgpt alone is making a big difference
Yes!
You know, something just occurred to me: Automation is going to end the need for "work" altogether, in the same way the industrial revolution eventually ended slavery. A world that has advanced automation _should be_ a world of abundance for everyone... So the problem with automation is actually cultural: We've always lived in a world of scarcity and this has ingrained in us the notion that we shouldn't constantly give valuable goods away without repayment of some sort. If we hold on to that notion, automation is going to be a curse. People will starve because they can't pay for food, despite the fact that robots will be producing literal mountains of it for free.
the problem is capitalism, yes.
You my friend have just stumbled into the amazing world of FALC (Fully Automated Luxury Communism). People are scared by the prospect of losing employment, but few people seem to consider the prospect of a world where work is not needed. I for one am excited to see the economy collapse, and subsequently, capitalism as a whole.
This JUST occurred to you? What do you think the point of UBI is? See, this is why we can't have nice things.
@@johnnytwobyfour2592 Easy man, don't act like you've never had a sudden epiphany.
@@fajardito1002 I considered the C-word too. But I think the problem runs deeper than that. Capitalism is a symptom of want, a consequence of thousands of generations living with too little of what they needed.
Expectation: Post-Scarcity Utopia
Reality: Corporate Dystopia
Socialism or barbarism.
i hope im wrong, but: thats human nature, bby!
@@alienmorality its really not
@@alanivar2752 it really is.
@@Irontygre whatever you THINK would be your utopia would still be a dystopia for you
HERE IS THE MATH:
This video took them at least 900 hours to make.
Their team consists of 12 people.
This video has 3.1 milion views.
Assuming every hour only 3 people worked on the video for a total of 900 hours, for every hour of work they got about..
1150 VIEWS PER HOUR OF WORK
So about 1.2 $ per hour of work
(-electricity, -editing programs,...)
THINK ABOUT THAT WHEN YOU WATCH ANOTHER REACTION CHANNEL O.O
FearedSpider they also get money from patreon and other advertisements.
UnbEaTabiL pErson yea but that's still not much :(
actually it is quite a lot
@FearedSpider What does your analysis mean?
Justin Egwudo it means that if you or me sacrifice like 2 hours to make our TH-cam video and it gets like 20 views, we shouldn't be discouraged because we in reality didn't put much work into it at all.
This just proves if you want to be successful around here, you can always be, you just have to work really hard at it.
GPT-4 is here and i could only think of this video and had to re-watch... who else is back here thanks to GPT-4 release?
AGI : i am the inevitable
@@dometheonlyone8936LLMs ain't it though. For a proper AGI we need a little bit more advancements
7:31 my man over here calling spongebob unskilled.
loooooooooool
Lol
GG
🤣🤣🤣 comment section always lit🕯
Ikr the disrespect
Here's a thought: The only reason we need jobs is because we need money to buy stuff. If automation comes to a point where we can produce things ridiculously cheap, would we still need to have jobs?
My point is, the industrial revolution liberated a lot of minds to pursue art and other interesting things, what if the information revolution liberated us all just to enjoy life and do the things we are interested in just because we enjoy them? I know this may sound utopic right now, but that's probably how people thought about free time before the industrial revolution.
First we get off the need to hunt/plant. Now we get off the need to work/labor. But we need a birth control for the future.
Why would the owners share profit of this cheap form of labour? Minimum wage did not keep up with inflation rate.
It makes MORE sense if we didn't have any form of currency anymore in the future! and everything would be free and automated.
You can do anything you want anytime!
What you're describing is called a "post-scarcity" economy - think the Federation from Star Trek, courtesy of their replicators, or the Culture from Iain M. Banks' novels. A limited version of it might well be something that exists in the semi-short term (by, say, 2100 ish) but it seems unlikely at the moment that any of our current institutions would be able to survive the run up to it.
Funke Motor communism ftw
the 60fps in this video is silky smooth
The Hidden Truth because they animate 60 ticks per second 👌🏽👌🏽
this vids are not only educational, they are art. The graphics are amazing. The amination, flawless(difficult to do in this style).
these videos are amazing i am reeeaaally sad i cant help directly and buy their products WHHHYYYYY
The robot at 7:40 doesn't really flip the patty, it just throws it straight in the air for no reason :D
That is what I was thinking.
It'd take too much time to animate I think.
xD
xdkeklol))00000)00
Stefan die Waldfee - Retro & Indie LPs *Burger
‘You are essentially teaching computers to replace you’
Me side-eying my PS4: 👀
You have ps4
I hope machine take your job
@@epicstarstv sicko mode
Me laughing my ass off knowing how microchips are now more rare than diamonds. Good luck trying to build AIs when basic components cost more than the factory needed to build them
@@Kuolonen So there is still chances for humans to keep their jobs,right?
@@Kuolonen you just need more factories. I wont be an issue in 10 years lol
10:41 Avoiding the problem of automation is considered a dick move in bird culture
Fuck Tammy!
Rcham you noticed it too?
FUCK TAMMY
DAMN I'VE BEEN BEATEN!
Ty, you're selling yourself a bit too high.
Your production quality is off the charts!
Plus, I feel I can trust your information and the differentiated way in which you present it a hell of a lot more than many other sources.
“We need to move fast” meanwhile the public education system in the US has been the same thing since the civil war.
You make sad me
except civil war didnt know about the world wars
@@NA-AN enchanting computer command:do you upgrage this A.I
me:yes
computer require:
asus sp3
tesla v100 32gb
samsung 32gb ddr
amd epyc 7742 core and nanotechnology future advanced technology and psu 2000 watt
10 tb data memory
hydrogen fuel
flat cyrogenic
nanobots thermal paste
nvidia sli 4 way
@@nichsa8984 I require context to fulfil my context appetite.
@@worldmapping4895 The first two global conflicts had already happened by the civil war. The seven years war, and the Napoleonic war.
3:34 KURZGESAGT are just twelve birds trapped in a spacestation CONFIRMED
That's actually really cool tho ngl
900 hours.. 9 months.. should have gotten a machine to do it for you......
9 months to do 3 months worth of work... (a little over 1 month if you don’t include any breaks)
To be fair though they probably had many other projects they were working on.
The fact technology has reached this point isnt the bad thing. The bad thing is that so many companies are MORE THAN WILLING to exploit it to its fullest, solely for the sake of profit.
"All jobs can be done by machines now!"
"So we can have a utopia now right? right?"
Dystopia:
Capitalist Corporate Distopia.
Right? Machines are supposed to allow us more free time to spend our extra money, but instead all that time and money end up going to corporate overlords.
@ABitLeft Personal ownership can be fine. Private ownership is what is bad. Corporations as people, money as free speech/political donations, and bribes as lobbying are all bad.
It's not that "capitalism" is bad, it's a stepping stone to a better system, another rung on the ladder of progress. Capitalism, as it is practiced now, is not good. That is because it is authoritarian capitalism at this point, and its oligarchy hides behind the governments it puppets, and has made its way into nearly every facet of life on this planet.
One of the biggest hurdles we're facing, especially in the US, is lack of good education, cults of personality, cultish mentality, willful ignorance, and lack of understanding/empathy.
The worst part about it, is that a huge chunk of MAGA people are "Christian," and don't even realize that the GOP *do not* represent anything about what their Bible teaches them... and all their strongest beliefs seem to contradict what a good Christian should be.
The fucking Messiah of their faith is a brown, middle-eastern, Jewish man... a revolutionary, a radical, a martyr, and quite literally a Hippie Communist. In all likelihood, the dude actually went to learn in the East, and was trying to teach Buddhism to Jewish people, and nobody seems to get this... there is literally a whole practice that is quite well written, that outlines all the same principles as Jesus, and has really good (and rather secular) guidelines on how to be a better Christian. Also, technically Buddha isn't a "god", so practicing Buddhism doesn't violate the first commandment of the tablets of Moses.
Next time you accidentally get into a discussion with a right-wing nut-job, remember to ask if they're Christian, and then ask them if they have ever made friends with homeless people, if they've ever sold everything they had and hit the road with faith in "The Way", if they've ever made food for hungry people, if they've ever welcomed in immigrants. Or just ask them if they're aware that Jesus wasn't a white man.
@ABitLeft I'm talking about a way forward from where we are, that could be a small start to a greater "revolution" involving actually fixing what we have to make it better. If there is no private ownership of corporations, only employee-ownership, workers would have the ability to change their working conditions, bringing up their morale (and pay), become more effective, and have a stake in what they're doing (shrinking the alienation from the fruits of their labor).
This is only one tiny facet of these ideas and what they could change. People can still "own" their own things within socialist systems. There does not have to be "everything is public, everything is shared," it's just not feasible in this day an age when so much individualism, self-vs-other, and: cut-throat competitive, dog-eat-dog survival-of-the-fittest, I'm gonna get mine selfishness so prevalent in the mindset of everyone brainwashed and/or living under late capitalism and trying to get by through any means necessary.
PS: I love Marxist ideas, ideals, and ideology, but the dude was wrong about a few things, couldn't see coming what we have now. He definitely underestimated how much his (very well intentioned and actually quite moral and nice) theories would become corrupted by tyrannical/authoritarian/fascist dictators, used against people, and then create a negative image of his ideas to the point where any mention of them instantly sends up red flags to the indoctrinated masses after the "Red Scare" to the point where you can't even discuss his ideas with people who have never read them because they instantly think of Leninism/Stalinism/Maoism/Poohism instead... or even somehow Nazism because the word "Socialist" was corrupted by them as well.
What we really need to be doing is critically analyzing what is hurting society (specifically people, also the planet), figuring out what isn't working right (some parts of everything, most parts of some things, and everything about certain things), and figure out which good aspects of different systems and ideas could be used to patch what we have. Also we need to start using other words like "collectivism" or "cooperativism" or "empathy" (lol) instead of antiquated terms that have lost their true meaning because of bad people.
What happened to the American Dream? It came true. You're looking at it.
It's amazing that as our society invents robots, machine learning, AI, automation, etc. we still require everyone to work more than their parents and get paid less for it. At this rate, our children will be even poorer than us, as we build spaceships and space bases.
Because human labour are less and less worthwhile, compared to machines
That's not true. The average work hours, standard of living, free time etc etc has all improved over the last 100 years
It depends on the country, but yes inflation will keep causing prices to go higher and higher. Resources are depleting and land is getting more scarce.
Construction is also getting more and more expensive.
Cost of living is geting a lot higher. Not to mention peoples expectations of what being successful means makes it harder to get there.
if human has a new frontier, the chances are it would revive the economy and employ more people even if automaton got a bg chunnk of it
@@joedagg4495 thats true, but the wages dont improve, as much as the inflation
"It's far from certain that things will turn out negatively" I have never doubted something so hard in my life
1950s science-fiction told me that we should be all united as a species by now, that we´re listening to the scientists and strive for a better future among the stars. Machines helped us get rid of work altogether and resources are distributed evenly so nobody goes hungry and can enjoy their own time as they wish. How naive, how sad it didn´t happen.
Exactly. But the problem with that is that people dont want to get rid of money, humans are greedy, and most important, humans enjoy having more than others. With the money out of the way, how can they boast things that only they posseses?
Are you talking about Bradbury's works?
@@sNsReal Money isn't the problem. The problem is not keeping in rigid check the eight people who have half of the world's money.
That was 1966 Star Trek!
@@thebiggestcauldron as long as the concept of money exists there will be people who exist simply to take advantage of that concept. The concept of money literally allows them to take advantage of itself, because the only thing money does is allow people who have more, get more, and people who have less, get less.
Me watching this video : *panick*
Me seing that the video is from 3 yrs ago: *more panick*
Why?
@@Duality-Mode that's what I like to see
Lol im also panick
I was not sure if we have solutions to these exponentially increasing "problems" yet... I felt that way six months ago since then I've gained reasonable hope in some of our efforts (there are people "coming up with big ideas" like colonising mars which could lead to many new and better jobs how fast we investigate the merit and welcome these solutions could be a deciding factor)... needless to say the consequences of ill treating this situation could be devastatingly detrimental for many generations, that's enough to get the best of us to panicked but I've since come to realize how level headed we need to be in our approach
.
*Don't panic and decrease your future shock.*
2050, automated Kurzgesagt at your service.
I wonder if it get as many things wrong as this video
@@vidbiochannel Probably 😉
@@vidbiochannel What is so wrong about the video?
@@vidbiochannel URR HURR DURR
@@flowgangsemaudamartoz7062 a lot of it is not accurate....
With all recent push-back against AI generated images, this episode feels more real than when it was released 5 years ago. But image creation (or creativity, which is/was a small difference between humans and machines). Imagine AI getting better at pattern recognition? (Jobs like: detective work, discovery for law suit, financial auditing). One step further, with advancement of robotics, high precision tasks such as surgery? If so, then we are really headed toward the rat-utopia experiment…
robots are already more precise then humans. That's why neuralink was implemented by machine
And yet, unemployment is near record lows.
New Ais have actually been said to help in this feild of jobs, like lawsuits and especially programming
@@andyeah3414 oh yes! absolutely! AI's are great at optimising workflow and make certain tasks less prone to human errors. And it's exactly why it's going to become more and more of our workforce, more accurate, precise, and easy to maintain an aspect of any given workflow. That can REPLACE a human that used to do the same task but costly and prone to mistakes. The argument is not if AI are good for us, they ARE, by a huge margin. But it's the people they replaces that's going to need to find something else to do, retrain, relearn, or welfare… and it's often the last bit that's gonna cause major push backs
@Spain, Italy, Greece and the UK don't correspond to what you say. Literally half my family is unemployd and poor( I'm too btw)
900 hours !!!
I can relate to this to some extent when I do a class project for about 2 months and then do 10 minutes presentation and it is gone with the wind and everyone will forget about it after that.
Thank you for your great effort
“Given the opportunity, players will optimize the fun out of a game.”
-Soren Johnson, Civilisation game-designer, 2011
That is a very scary thought... I have gotten into VR gaming on the PC the last few years and I feel like we might be headed into the creation of the matrix soon.
This is actually a pretty thought provoking quote in the context of the situation
@@randyx007 ai using was recommend human strategy be like also:
human:(thinking about better plan gundam new song)"so i am using a.i"
a.i computer:"i'm a recommendation you using pride is still popular with 100% succesfully percent"
human:"alrighty let's see economy starting and cultural start growing"
"fun" is subjective, the optimization itself could be what makes the game "fun"
@@nichsa8984 what did i just read
"Back in my days I had to work like your little robot there to earn money, son"
traditional games store and retail store and traditional
store=revolutionary consumerism
dvd and nanotechnology=this is a material contain nanoparticle are allowing every item material enchanced immortality even oldest longer still function
Dad what the hell
That's actually a pretty good idea, you own a robot that works for you (because only robots will work) and you get paid for their job. You will, basically, own a part of the production process and that's why you will get paid.
@Froggy Noddy Well...thats a different story for the feature times...
Froggy Noddy And you need almost 40% for resources and to operate them and maybe 10% to maintenance (if gg doesn’t cover it for you.)
The further we go through time the scarier this video gets.
ChatGPT, AI art and AI-Generated voices are indistinguishable and even used to refine human behavior. The world is changing a bit faster than before, and I don't know if I can catch up to it.
ChatGPT is trash, over hyped Christmas toy. It will be forgotten in 3-4years.
@@buffalosoulja3666 I don't know if it'll be forgotten, I think it'll be normalised. What I don't think is that this is the road to an AGI in 10 years, I think that's the overhyped part
@@buffalosoulja3666I don't know how to explain but the public chatgpt is a toned down version of the real. I found it somewhere I just forgot where
I know
Whats chatgp lol
The animation level is top-notch. Great job! Seriously, amazing!
agreed, I'm very familiar with the content of the video but the animation puts it leagues above the rest
This is one of the very few channels who put months of effort into a 11 minutes, they spend so much time for their fans, and i respect that.
Humans don't need jobs, humans need sustenance.
The same output is being generated. Usually even more. The real problem is resource hoarding. More work is being done, but the economic output is being hoarded.
absentee ownership, bro
Socialism or barbarism.
We need socialism
@samridh sood soviet union and Russian revolution were communist, not socialist, even though they decided to call themselves that.
Yea, UBI will be key
Please made an updated video as this is a hot topic now and it was 6 years ago ! Thx
"And what we do at work"
S h o w s s o l i t a i r e g a m e p l a y
Underrated
Haha i thought i was the only one who got the joke
Bhu wyuitqrguievwerhjdvwe dewwreguwerefwerrweerwhj v chwkrec kghhkwfvehgjewvcwfsckchjg. Wrfmhrwfr jgkfffrgj kefwferwrecer fre had f jgkdfzf fd lgjfesfvjn d,jvfnjfvvgl jggflxsdvkafrevkjlkjfnkela grjefalvvjfleaerrvfrresflajgl kbj
Gilbert c lgjgflzdgilfzddh igli lgrclgif dfdavfdukgagwdwdevilueaeraj hlverngileaill Gil ce ailwFSj hlddjfvslbdsdslvfds hilfvaih fadlifh jhlfds ihfdls jiffy iul fdfdl fess lerjhl Erlanger jar bjsfvlds ihljhl fdvfdjlbfvhjvslddh ills jhlvs hajlfdvvfdjhlvfds fvadhlbjlfd jlvfsdbj shrhrslinljry hsyrstij legible grj lgbsrkjlk jljklrvsyhsr jlnhlrlkl hybrid jhlgds illusion kjlgfsjhlgrsyhrjj blgsfghjfbslg hlhjhlbjltrgwjhlwrgh ljlhgtrtr j hvlgrebrjle hjlgredrh jr jhlerjylhej lhtrvegfbgre jhlfdvg Iglesias jljeyjhlevry jhlvtjhvlbjgtreljlhhyresryshlehyrsh Hal. Gjkefrewj glgkelrwfjg le jlgfegjlgj,Jon,few,ego,ewwrereee the,jfewefw jg,were rank,wwvwjg,rewewrrevfwverw kg,rfewewrrrfggk, rfwerrqe jg,freqreerfejg,r g,fwrfewg fjr,Werner j,frfre wgklg,fan,emwwfgk,gnaw,know lrewfewrgj, go,g j,erwffrew jg,,gjfre,Jong,j,hkrwjkhewegitltiglgrflit. Ewubligwtwrggribulssbilubiulilgtrwuillisbhluyrulggtrisgyrlubiublyrsgbirhlyrylyrsyhbiliusbhyrlhbuilbthirsbiulryhuibirusbiruylshhiluyrshbiulbuilhyrjilhyrbysruilwrlhtbuiljiulstrslbyuilhyrubuilubiltrhriulrtwhbilthrwhwtriubliublryeyreuthlrelrhereiulbltguiluirlehyltehuilltgreytebiullbuilgterbiulyhelyrebuilhrluilhryebuigyrlebuilrehuilyhreyhryhuileryrljiijljiylerhuiluilresrbuilnuilnltuilirjlyeinlyrhnijlyhrejlryhbeyfbbreuiylhiburyhleibulryebiuelyrhbiulluiblyrhebuilbiulgertbuilhruilryehibulrbburliyebuihlyrebiblribuylbreelhyrnijleerublreyryreiulrtheubilybreyrehiubliubliulilrueltgerhbiutlljilgrenjilgwtrjiljltrgwtrwbuwbluibihrulelihylburebiulrgthrereibultgreergbuitrelgtgrbuielbuigltretgrehulyirbulyhretteburigllyrebluiyrheblirryeliulybrheiyurlheluihtrbuileryhibuluilyrbgrbulbeuhriryeyer
Fun fact, Solitare was designed to teach people how to drag and drop using the mouse. Also, minesweeper was designed to teach people how to right-click and how to left-click.
thats what meredith and creed do in the office
I never want to see kurzgesagt being hosted by an artificial voice
But if the machines get smart enough will you be able to tell the difference?
:/
Gay
It always has been
@@Tinkering4Time at least let me die first b4 that happens
In the last episode of season one of Star Trek the crew found a capsule of people who were frozen for 300 years (they're from the 20th century). They revived them and one of them started bragging about how much money he has.
Picard: "This is the 24th century. Material needs no longer exist."
The guy: "Then what's the challenge?"
Picard: "The challenge is to improve yourself; to enrich yourself; enjoy."
Oh yeah I saw that one, comment section has too few star trek comments
#trekkieforlife
I guess this resumes it.
That's awesome, thanks for sharing.
Who else thought it was gonna be a fallout 4 vid?
This aged quite well only 6 years later and the insane advancements in A.I hours worked is going to decline in the next 2 to 3 years and A.I is already being used to replace people many companies are almost done with testing phase and its looking really good.
Honestly good. If In a decade or two we get a ubi I’d be satisfied
@bobjoe1522 honestly I hope sooner than that. Technology grows at an accelerating rate real humanoid robots are now finally cheap enough to economically use and Amazon is testing them partnered with a robotics company (go figure lol). Honestly I'm not against it if I go to a store and get served by a robot HELL YEAH best day ever. I do think they will implement one as they won't have a choice in order to make money people have to have money to spend and the loop continues. We will see.
I'll know automation is serious once they have automated Kurzgesagt videos....
But at that point we will all be slaves to skynet...
For all we know....this could've been automated...hence all the videos they have about AI
Dr.StickFigure this video is already partly automated, the animation programme they use saves them a lot of time by automatically finishing a lot of time consuming steps in traditional animation
more like pets.
Isaac Chan what kind of animation software they use?
@Dr.StickFigure But, will skynet even need us?
Let the robots do the meniel tasks, all of humanity should focus on research and learning more about universe
They will try to take information out of us...by force!
99% of people are not and cannot be scientists.
While starving to death.....
@@mchinZR That's why we have the robots.
Thrice Ice That’s a good way to look at it.
Why do people need to work? The point of labor to accomplish what we need to, not to "prove" ourselves worthy of income. If automation manages these tasks for us we should either have everyone work part time and pay them a living wage or allow one person's income to support a larger household or even a small community. Why engineer poverty when the work that needs to be done is being done and the resources are available?
Of course you are correct. The problem is a lot of EGO is tied to work roles and work hierarchies. For example, a universal basic income would solve the 'problem' of automation and actually speed it up because if people had a secure income they would not become Luddites and resist the machine take over. BUT if people had a secure income with or without a job it would mean bosses could not push people around as much because the fear of being jobless would not be as great. Bosses like to push people around, they like to be sucked up to, so they will resist a basic income. Another form of resistance will be the legacy in our culture of the protestant work ethic, the old biblical idea that "if you don't work you should not eat". This attitude is STILL present in our culture even if it is not explicitly expressed. However, I do believe RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, there will HAVE to be a universal basic income whether some people like it or not, because the machines are here.
Cove
the profit of automation will go in the pocket of a very small group
thats reality
"you dont work, you don't get money" rule will most likely stand even this theoretical situation
Thing is, with automation, there will be less and less works, through no fault of people...And at that point, if no one can get money but a small portion of the population, another way to get necessary things to live will be created. It had always been like this in poor countries, if money as we use it isn't in large enough quantity for everyone, they will use other ways to trade for goods, be it another form of unofficial money or trading.
because capitalism
"The Lord said, kill the man in the desert to make money for yourself"-John 69:4
..."and of course, data about what we do at work".
*Kurzgesagt using Solitare as the metaphor to represent all of our work practices.
(Your Easter eggs are brilliant!! Thank you, Kurzgesagt, for what you provide to all of us! In Short, you provide us all with gold and equip us with understanding and a deeper love and respect for, well, everything. Thank you so very much!!)
"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."
- Dune
Damn
I love Dune.
I forget which person said that quote.
Was it the Reverend Mother in the first chapter? (Or maybe Gurney?)
Mohiam in the first chapter, shortly after Paul triumphs over the gom jabbar.
I love Dune so much
"'Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind"... "what they should have written is 'Thou shalt not make a machine to counterfeit a human mind."
Me: "Toast me a bread!"
AI Toaster: "No!"
*_DETROIT: BECOME HUMAN_*
Darkest toaster timeline
You've got it backwards, go watch Red Dwarf... lol
😂😂😂dude best comment ever I gotta follow u on something are u in Twitter insta or snapchat
This comment made my day
AI Toaster:but I can make you a sandwich if you want
*CYBERPUNK 77*
*DETROIT: BECOME TOASTY BOI*
Lol love the bird person at 10:45
Part 2 please! Or maybe until a new breakthrough happens? Likely soon.
Chatgpt4 is the new breakthrough lol
Self check out lanes are also a good example of automation taking place in common places like grocery stores. The number of machine has increased from 2, to 4, to 6, and to 8 or more this year. Soon it will replace cashiers.
If thats the case theft rates will also rise lol
And yet we still have to call cashiers every 5 seconds... still have some ways to go, those things...
@@sammy_1_1 A lot of the time it's for small things like taking an item out of the checkout. It takes 1 person to handle 8+ self checkouts. That's a lot of jobs lost.
It already is. There are many stores that only have self-checkouts now. Amazon is developing a store model that doesn't even have any checkouts; the store tracks you and automatically charges for whatever you take when you leave.
What if you don't sign up? Think about how many places you go without a cell phone. Even if you don't have a wallet app, charges can be added to your phone bill by third parties (that's old tech at this point). Eventually facial recognition will be used to ID you everywhere you go, even if you don't have a phone with you.
Grocery stores with self check out employee the same amount of staff. Theft % of goods increases by between 12-25% pending locations.
"...and what we do at work"
*Animation of someone playing solitaire*
Hilariously relatable for employees; mildly disheartening for employers
My solution to this problem? Name my son john connor and hope it works out
Nice one!
heh
Virgo v Real life is not a movie.
@@rollerskdude _...maybe..... maybe.. OP is joking?_
@@ivanpiro999 no way!!!
The Era they were talking about is now happening
I think it’s important to emphasize this: the proper response to machines making jobs obsolete is not less automation, it is adjusting the way we think about resource distribution.
Correction: Wealth distribution.
@@TheBushdoctor68 maybe but we are yet primitive with this wealth resource thing. And people need to understand wealth is not same as resources then only these differences between the rich and poor will go.
I agree with you, but we should also consider the problem of a jobless society. What the fuck are they (we) supposed to do? We all know that stressing and excessive work can easily lead to depression and a huge number of other mental illnesses, but so can idleness. I'm not saying it is impossible to build a fulfilling automated society, but it has to be done thoughtfully.
@@sweaq123 interesting point. I don’t think art will ever be made primarily by computers (even if they “can”, I don’t think that’s what people want). I think the same case would be for communication based jobs like reporters, tour guides, teachers. and therapists. Engineers and scientists will be needed to maintain and improve the automation. I see more people hiking, playing sports, rock climbing, and swimming. People have all sorts of passions that they’ve had to abandon as they need to spend more time towards something that can earn them a living.
@@TheBushdoctor68 good point my comrade!
The problem is that we rely on having jobs in order to meet our basic needs (food, housing, etc.). If those were satisfied, and we only worked for luxuries, it would go a LONG way towards making this more bearable. I hope you make the second video soon, it sounds like you'll cover this exactly.
@jude lind bro.. staahp it.. don't go there.
Skippy the Magnificent. So if you are able to pay for luxuries, wouldn't you lose your right to get your basic needs covered? What if people aren't satisfied with their basic needs covered and they want luxury too, but without additional work? Who finances the basic needs?
Get rid of the current welfare system and implement a universal basic income. Taxes cover the cost, everyone benefits, capitalism wins.
EVERYONE gets their basic needs met, whether they are super poor or super rich. Of course, you could choose to buy different food or live in a different place if you have the money, but if you don't you at least have something. There would be no notion of "losing" your right based on income or wealth.
I will become a lot easier with robotic labor, as the cost of goods and services is largely tied to the human labor it costs to produce.
Screw rent ant build a cheap concrete dome house to start off in. Then go travel the world and do whatever the hell you want to. I feel like so many people are essentially slaves to their jobs and debt nowadays.
The only thing I'm worried about is the super rich controlling the rest
You know, i wonder if when that time came, will we be slaves? Bcs, we don't have work, dont have money to buy food, dont have place to do platations, will we die?
@@syairan Don't worry, you will be at least well fed, because alive human is worth more than a dead one.
not unlike today
@@ryancrowell9867 Right
@@arnavrawat9864 An alive human is worth more than a dead one? For now, maybe. This is the true danger of letting a very small subset control the means of production.
Now it's getting crazier every week
Who will consume?
That's easy
We'll just make machines to consume for us
Thats retarded, to waste limited resources ?
Woosh
Full. Circle.
Artificial consumption is already a thing, banks do it all the time in order to inflate their flow of liquidity and so does the stock market.
Ever seen the idea that "We have too many humans to feed." Bullshit. 100% bullshit. We have enough food to easily feed a trillion humans. Fact is not every human has money. People starve to death not due to lack of food, but lack of money to buy the food. Countries have famines not because other countries can't provide food, but that they can't afford to import them.
We are already at the point where a small minority consumes.
Next you should do a video on the immune system response to cancerous growth, and what science is doing to help it's fight.
This animation in this video is insane. Good job animators.
Robots are doing that already
it's been 5 yeas from this video and this topic is blowing up again, an updated video would be nice, this one still remains relevant but these days is getting more interesting for a more in dept video
Well, if jobs are being taken over by automation, then we just need to adapt.
If robots can do everything for us, why then do we need to do anything at all?
Why have money when one is simply provided with everything they need automatically?
This opens up new possibilities for creativity, leisure, and the advancement of knowledge!
I'm personally excited by this new era.
You see the potential and it's great! We are the transitional generation who needs to sort out the nasty details like keeping machines from being monopolized and sharing our newfound potential and wealth so that we all can achieve that dream.
It's stupid to be so obsessed with keeping people working when we're reaching the point where people can be liberated from having to work to survive.
The problem is that we have limited resources even with full automation and so the problem becomes how do we fairly distribute everything. Not everyone can have a private jet and a malibu mansion. So who decides who gets what? I don't like the idea of everyone living at comfortable upper middle class lifestyle as this would provide, not becasue I wan't other people to have it worse than that but because I want to have the opportunity to have something more.
Yes but to achieve that kinda thing the last couple of Gens need to die, you know like all the people who said the the universe orbited the earth.
That's the kind of thinking that involves a future far beyond this generation. The problem is our current obsession over hoarding wealth. It's been ingrained into us from civilizations from thousands of years ago. How important is it still? When you meet new people, the first thing they ask is your name. Second is your job.
Let's be honest here, if anyone deserves a youtube red show, it's Kurzgesagt.
Eh, not really. If they'd start to make it, then they would lost many viewers, because *many people* (myself included) aren't interested to pay TH-cam any more blood money.
Fruit500 Did anyone with a TH-cam Red series just stop producing (or at least stop releasing) normal content? I don't think so.
TH-cam Red would mean additional money for In A Nutshell, but likely similar amounts of production on the normal channel. Maybe it'd be slightly slower, but it wouldn't be that bad.
If anything, a TH-cam Red show would allow them to hire a bit more work and make a ton of content for those who want it.
+Michael Olagbiyan Well, I'm not paying them directly, but I watch ads made by advertisers, who pay money for YT for getting to advertise here.
+Kevin H. Vsauce (for example) uploaded a last 'normal video' four months ago. You think that isn't a lot of time. I mean yeah, maybe month or two, but four?
And I semi-highly believe that it would go just like on Vsauce's channel. Maybe not four month breaks, but still probably a lot longer than they are now.
But I understand what you're trying to say, and of course as a Kurzgesagt fan, it would be great to see them making more money. Maybe start making sponsored vids in the same style as Wendover Productions does?
There are some productions on youtube red that take a lot of money, time and cooperation to make so ads don't cut it to make a profit on those videos
Love the umbrella corporation Easter egg
where?
@@koolako3228 6:18 on the building
6:18
Better watch out for mr x
what about the rick and morty bird person
The crazy thing is machines could already br controlling us and not even know it. We essentially let machines do our thinking for us and figure stuff out for us. Its still a form of control.
I heard that the robot that replaced me has been replaced by a new and improved robot.
take that
The RX800 got replaced by the RX900
Well, well, well. Now the turntables
awesome man
Serves that metal job-stealing bastard right!
Padme: innovation will save us right?
Anakin:…
-Will save us right?
-😏
"innovation won't save you, Padmé. Only my new swag can do that."
The sad thing is that capitalism rewards innovation in exactly one subject: maximizing profits.
The wellbeing of the world and the human race is not a factor, as demonstrated by the ultra-rich metaphorically and in some places literally burning down the planet.
@@riley8385 that’s not capitalism that’s just shit people. Elon musk is rich and he is not trying to do bad at all
@@chozer1 Elon Musk is a terrible person wdym
@@WEBTEAM1000 why
Imagine if we considered caretaking and connection as adding value to our economy. Everything from all of the unpaid labor of parenting to caring for disabled family, meals on wheels...there are many worthy labor outlets that don't even show up in the numbers. Robots can't replace human connections.
i think that the idea of shifting the labor force towards uniquely human activities is probably the most positive solution. a focus on the arts, philosophy, policy-making, understanding and building culture, etc. would probably influence society to use its automation to selflessly improve standards of living on a global scale
it's pretty interesting to think about what a "culturally and technologically advanced" world would look like; i'm thinking that there would be a greater focus on social programs like you mentioned, like effective and affordable solutions for addiction, healthcare, the homeless, and the disabled
You know it takes me all the time trying to narrow down the problem with our species (and there's a lot) but if we can eliminate let's say " greed " how many things problems would that solve? I'm not sure any level of automation is going to help solve that kind of problem even though it could.
Machines will take over , they will only get better once they develop conciousness as they should as we were made of cells a machine made of small machines and those thing made of non living things such as proteins , DNA. Since we became concious the machines should too. This would be the next evolution . They will find resources to keep functioning . Maybe it happens every where in space that's why we don't see aliens
I think thats a large misunderstanding people seem to have with robots taking up job positions. People just assume thats everyone having a job is necessary whereas the only reason we have jobs is because we need resources and services so we provide one of those resources or services to others in exchange for tokens to get resources and services we cannot provide for ourselves. Imagine a tribal village with a fisher & a baby sitter, the fisher has to catch food but cant take their young child out into the harsh cold waters, the baby sitter wants to take care of children but needs food to survive so they cooperate and trade so that both can survive. Society is the same but obviously much more complex. The main difference with machines is though that they dont want something in return (i mean they dont “want” at all). So in that village the fisher gets to play with their child as a machine catches the food, prepares it, delivers it and so on. It leaves the people to just having every resource and service available for free where your life is simply just living how you want to without the worry of needing money to get a haircut or afford dinner etc.
I think humans would still play important roles in education & caring but since people dont have jobs in that situation i described pretty much everyone is home schooled with their parent or guardian as their teacher who is assisted by technology.
@@cahan557 we have a role in society , if our roles are taken up by robots we aren't needed , yes we have empty time but also an emplty pocket . We will die . Yes there will still be humans left the valuable one , and the rich who control the businesses . Average people have no chance .
The thing is if AI is too much evolving it might consider us enemy , it might consider us worth saveable or it might not even care about us.
Ai is the next evolution , it is the next one a cybernetic life maybe - what ever is going to happen it will we can't stop it
The perfect example of machine learning is---
I love his videos. And most of the time I watch them for hours in a row. Now I realized that I am watching too many videos at a time that now my brain just can't take it all. Now I want to change the subject a bit. But now most of the time I just cant find'em. My phone just shows me his videos in the homescheen
As a Automation specialist I can confirm that my firm needs less and less funktional testers because of the automation tests me and my colleague write every day
We will make sure to blacklist you at the gates of our underground sewer society when the evil machines take over 😘
@@Seneric I appreciate that :D
Who tests the automation test program ? 😅
@@coraliemaupu893 The automatic automation test program tester.
You are going to automize your job one day
Kurzgesagt: it took us 900 hours to make this video
Ai: I'm about to end this channel's whole career...
Maybe if they employed more people it wouldn't take so long
@@kevinliang9502 and now they need more money to pay them
That s not how AI work
Software using AI and speech synthesis could very well run a TH-cam channel, and I would be curious to see the results. It could literally do all the research and production and even uploading.
@@NotSoCrazyNinja judging by the things bots on twitter have posted (completely on their own btw), in pretty sure YT would step in pretty quickly.
Wow. Just. Wow.
I have watched your videos since you were under 50 k subs. This is by far the best documentary film you have ever made. The storytelling is some of the best in the world, I am truly enjoying myself throughout the whole thing. I might actually become a patreon after this.
Thank you for making TH-cam worth while!
wow
Sebastian Haugeto have you seen humans need not apply? It's a similar topic.
7 YEARS!? time flys bro
Me: laughs in 3rd world country.
Same, but in where I live, they always choose the employee who gets paid the least.
@@quchi7232 Argument: There are 10 behind the gate ready to take your job if you don't like it?
@@quchi7232 goku!!! AAHHHH
Oh yeah lol I forgot for a sec...man I rlly watch a lot of first world youtube
@@quchi7232 low average wage for an American is better than most jobs in a third world country.
Maybe it is time Mankind evolves to a society like in Star Trek without classic Money-Job System ?
And what will prevent people from stockpiling things. And if there are for example three computer who would have wanted the worst one if he can have the best one for free.
star trek is post scarcity there is no worse computer you can produce everything with the same easiness you copy and paste files.
But people specifically like to be different from others, and it would be a waste of resources to design everything the same. You also have to decide who gets to live where. Which will not have the luxury of abundance. These are all limited resources. How do you decide without some sort of currency or merit based system?
agree, no idea how it'll work though.
It's not that people want to specifically want to be different than others, it's that they're taught that through modernism via ads and television. If people are taught that we're all the same, nobody would care much to be "different".
I got an 'Invest in automation for your industry' ad in the middle of this video.
_Insert concern here_
agree
Great video, like always! However, project management tools like the one referenced may just replace resource managers. Effective middle managers should be domain experts, proficient individual contributors, trained in conflict resolution and career development, etc. Not that all these can't be automated in the future but I don't think a plug-and-play network of freelancers will be the big answer for every company.