Autel Evo Nano Plus Vs DJI Air 2S Video Quality - Epic clash with SURPRISING winner

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 112

  • @VICVideopIC
    @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Autel Evo Nano Plus: amzn.to/3hvCeKi
    Autel Evo Nano Plus Premium Bundle: amzn.to/3C6Xv6y
    Autel Evo Nano Basic Model: amzn.to/3pwosf2
    DJI Mavic 3: amzn.to/3smh1ce
    ND filters for Mavic 3: amzn.to/3IG2jCJ
    DJI Air 2S: amzn.to/3sofT7S
    ND filters for Air 2S: amzn.to/3sxQRDz
    DJI Mini 2: amzn.to/3M3SL6u
    ND filters for Mini 2: amzn.to/3tfkF6O
    DJI Mini SE: amzn.to/3sonCTx
    DJI RC Pro for Mavic 3, Air 2S: amzn.to/3IqfCHf
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    On1 Photo RAW: my photo editing and video organizing software: www.on1.com/affiliates/idevaffiliate.php?id=1161
    Coupon Code: VICVP15 for 15% discount on price
    My video about ON1 Photo RAW: th-cam.com/video/z_-yvnhGpRE/w-d-xo.html
    Neat Video, best denoiser for video: www.neatvideo.com/?linkID=p7938
    My favorite action and 360° camera: Insta360 ONE R Twin Edition and 1 Inch:
    Specs and prices www.insta360.com/sal/one_r?insrc=INRYD2I
    Accessories store.insta360.com/accessory?insrc=INRYD2I

  • @lanjohnson2914
    @lanjohnson2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Vic, thanks for your reviews, the night time footage is truly amazing, I still can't believe the quality.

  • @faviolozano1004
    @faviolozano1004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent work. Next vídeo nano plus vs mini 3 please!

  • @stephendoggett190
    @stephendoggett190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The crispness of the Nano is astonishing - it almost appears over sharpened, but I can see no sharpening artifacts - quite astonishing. The Nano does suffer from a slight blue cast and your colour grading helped a lot. Thank you again for posting this video.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Stephen,
      I do not see it as over sharpening, in my opinion is just a lot of true detail

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never trust any cameras, it does not matter if it is $50 or $100k camera, always film a grey card. Also people get confused with color correction with color grading, two very different things. Always color correct your footage and only than color grade to give the artistic look.

  • @Steve-kp9ct
    @Steve-kp9ct 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Vic, can I get original videos from Autel Evo Nano Plus? I’m considering Mini 3 and Autel Evo Nano Plus

  • @thesmith323
    @thesmith323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Vic. Did you do any color grading for the night footage?

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you,
      just a touch of color grading

  • @peterjb49
    @peterjb49 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your presentation! I have followed you for a long time now, so I have a question about your video editing software and how you get those rich colors such as noted in this video.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Peter,
      I use Premiere Pro for footage.
      I have made of couple of videos about how I post process video. Here are the links:
      th-cam.com/video/Tc5B3F506aU/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/tA6Ffd85fQc/w-d-xo.html

    • @peterjb49
      @peterjb49 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC Thank you!

  • @underthedrone2735
    @underthedrone2735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I`ve been having a discussion about the Nano+ camera being as good or even better than the Mavic 3 camera. You have pretty much confirmed this to be true. I don`t have unedited footage I can look at that hasn`t gone through TH-cam or other social media compression to see for myself. Perhaps you will be able to confirm my thoughts on this at a later time Vic. Thanks again for another good comparison, flight ability aside.

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The nano + has better lens, better sensors with better filters, bigger apertures and better voltages to digital. And the pixels density is high.

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SW-Video It is better than mavic 3. I work with video compression and high end interactive video walls. I have to program things by the pixels perfect. And based on all I do I can see very clear on a calibrated 4K TV the nano has better image and definition than the mavic 3. DJI fanatics may say that is over sharpening in fact it is because it is not.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My comparison with the Mavic 3 for footage will be published tomorrow and it was a very exciting clash!

    • @underthedrone2735
      @underthedrone2735 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC Great!

  • @DroneStories
    @DroneStories 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent and detailed presentation !! I confirm 150% !!!
    I have Lite + and I can not believe it !!! The quality of the camera is incredible !!!
    However, more options for manual settings (dlog, 10bit, etc) must be provided immediately. If and when some weaknesses of the application are corrected, I would be happy to sell all DJI drones ...

    • @lawrencecummings4426
      @lawrencecummings4426 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great review Vic, I am also a big fan of and own the Nano +, sold my Air 2S to get Mavic 3, also have Lite+. But one thing you cannot fly Nano in wind conditions.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you,
      I agree and I am thinking more and more about getting the Lite Plus

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Lawrence,
      I don't think a sub 250 grams little bird can compete with something like the Mavic 3.
      I keep both in my bag and when the wind gets bad, the little Nano stays warm in the bag and I pull out the big boy

  • @JoernR
    @JoernR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    VIC: Strange question: Did you also try to get similar "dark" nightshots with the Nano as the Air 2S delivered, with the street lights popping out? E. g. by using shutter in manual mode or EV correction? Sometimes we need just that effect to show it's really night-time. :)

  • @InteractiveDNA
    @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You compare the Nano + with the Mavic 3. I am 100% sure it will destroy as well on night shots and the video definition of the Nano+ will gave more details. I always say, it does not matter how big is the sensors if the lens are not good. The Nano + got everything right that’s why it has a higher video definition than the Mavic 3 and other drones as well.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My comparison with the Mavic 3 for footage will be published tomorrow and you have got it right

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC Great!!!! I can’t wait to see it! On my live streams I am sending people to watch your videos!!!! Great job!
      One more thing, the Nano + just go firmware that adds HDR and log.

  • @stephendoggett190
    @stephendoggett190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cannot wait to have a larger Autel drone with the YRBY sensor, which can cope with higher winds. The night vision is astonishing and is a real game changer.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right,
      Maybe I should try the Lite Plus

  • @itsamemario720
    @itsamemario720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Maybe it’s just me but the Nano footage looks oversaturated/overprocessed. Can be a tricky comparison. I’ll stick to my Air 2S for now.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is the normal mode.
      Now there is a flat log mode and a HDR one. I will test them very soon

  • @alexandrews2585
    @alexandrews2585 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The problem with nano+ is the price, premium combo in UK is £860, I Picked up air 2S in Aug 2021 for £930. Its a different class of drone and should not be compared to nano+. Also there is a LOT you can do with HLG and DLOG which none of the nano+/Lite+ do not have. Nano does look impressive however the shadows are very black. and there some over sharperring applied by the default algorithm.

  • @jamesyates9057
    @jamesyates9057 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this comparison. Although I would consider flight performance in challenging flight conditions and the Air2S does so well in extreme weather tests as compared to the Nano+.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally agree, in terms of flight performance the Air 2S is much, much better

  • @nathanbarzilay9025
    @nathanbarzilay9025 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Vic, Really impressed by the Nano Plus quality is incredible but for the price, I think the remote control should be something more pro, I recently got the Air 2S with the fly more combo and the new RC PRO and I really love it. Yes, video quality is amazing in the NANO PLUS. I'm using it for my hobby, not professionally yet!!!
    But You once again bring so much information and value with your comparisons that really make it so much easy to decide. Thanks!!!

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Nathan,
      in the remote controller of the Nano one thing the really bothers me are the two buttons that are exactly where my fingers are, therefore quite often I inadvertently hit one .
      But the video qualit is sublime!

  • @hdemetri
    @hdemetri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am really impressed with the Nano footage but I do think it looks a bit too over sharpened and processed. I find the Air 2s more pleasing and natural during the day. The night footage you are getting from the Nano is at a level that I've never seen before. That is my opinion based on the footage you are presenting. I always enjoy your videos and look forward to the next one!

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Many thanks Harry,
      I do process the files a bit and for YT videos I generally go further that what I normally do. My be I went a bit so far.
      But I agree,the detail of the Nano Plus is astonishing

    • @Kirryvideo
      @Kirryvideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC I think the same as the companion, it looks very sharp, too digital, the AIR 2S footage is more cinematic. At night, of course, there is no color, the NANO beats all the DJI by a landslide. Very good performance of that Autel drone. Regarding the mavic air 2s HLG file, what kind of processing does it need compared to D-Log? Thank you very much and greetings,

    • @YourreelmemoriesAu
      @YourreelmemoriesAu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes I agree. The Nano footage looks oversharp during the day but in night & dull conditions I think we have a new champion.

    • @JoernR
      @JoernR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Latest update added a Log mode with very conservative picture properties including sharpness.

    • @hdemetri
      @hdemetri 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JoernR That is great. I look forward to seeing some of the footage off of that mode.

  • @Matanumi
    @Matanumi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is honestly a more reasonable comparison then a Mini 2

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree,
      I also compared it to the Mavic 3 with interesting results

  • @stevencarey5407
    @stevencarey5407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vic, thanks for your excellent reviews of the Nano plus. I just bought a Mavic 3 but I want a small drone for travel. Based on your reviews, the Nano plus is my likely choice although rumors about the Mini 3 suggest that it might have a similar camera to the Nano plus. So I’ve got to decide whether to wait for the Mini 3 and see how it compares with the Nano plus or just pull the trigger now. As a volcanologist who has worked a lot in Italy I particularly like your shots that include Mt. Etna!

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Steven,
      this is exactly what I do: I keep the Nano Plus and the Mavic 3 in my bag. They complement each other to perfection

  • @steveborghardt
    @steveborghardt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review. I own an Autel Evo 2 Pro and also a Nano Plus. Nano plus is a great, very capable little drone. My only complaint is the lack of wind resistance, although that has gotten batter with recent releases. I'm hoping in the future it will get even better.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you Steve,
      I perfectl agree that the power and wind resistance have improved a good deal with latest updates

    • @msjj000
      @msjj000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve not had the wind issues and choose it even with the Mini 3 that is about ti be released - it’s a great drone

  • @dronevids1611
    @dronevids1611 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sooo crisp and clear video.

  • @wolfgangweber5417
    @wolfgangweber5417 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Vic, thank you for this further very interesting and meaningful video about Nano+ video quality. Your analyzes and comparisons confirm my decision to have bought the Nano+. Hopefully it will be delivered soon 😊.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Wolfgang,
      I am sure you will enjoy this great drone!

  • @dheller777
    @dheller777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the camera footage is probably better do to the filter on the Nano+. That said the rest of the drones capabilties as far as wind and the sensors giving a lot of people trouble falls much short of the Air 2S in my opinion.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree.
      The RYYB color filter plays a big role in the excellent video quality, but the Air 2S has other advantages

  • @agremlin77
    @agremlin77 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video😊, liked & subscribed, thanks for sharing ‼️

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you,
      and welcome aboard!

  • @geodrone7643
    @geodrone7643 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Over-sharpening in Nano+ is visible, that moire needs a little gaussian blur.
    Still, camera is very good, but the drone lacks a lot of things...in hoover is moving left-right-up-down a lot, when you move it in sides you get a difference in altitude that is not nice, there will be no Manual settings in all modes except PRO, so a BIG MINUS (who is making Hyperlapse in AUTO??? ).
    So...for family is good...for small works, I would not go to Nano+.
    We have it here in tests also.
    Also a few bugs for Android Sky APP users:
    - in Pano mode, the screen goes black if you have selected RAW only. Probably will be addressed later.
    - still no tracking, so we have no idea how will pinpoint the location for POI and how will work Follow Me (but was not a nice experience in any Autel drone).

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting points, especially the one about hyperlapses in auto mode.
      I agree, several things can be improved, but even as it is, I still find this drone extremely useful

  • @BANDAPIAZZOLLA
    @BANDAPIAZZOLLA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Complimenti per questo video, veramente ben fatto e molto interessante ma che mi ha lasciato l’amaro in bocca: ho appena ordinato un Air 2s…

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Grazie,
      comunque l?air 2S e un' ottimo drone

    • @BANDAPIAZZOLLA
      @BANDAPIAZZOLLA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC Approfitto della sua cortesia per farle una domanda. Ho appena ricevuto l’Air 2s e nelle prime riprese ho subito notato l’ombra delle eliche ai lati superiori dell’inquadratura, soprattutto nell’azzurro del cielo. Ha mai riscontrato un problema del genere?

  • @InteractiveDNA
    @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The nano + even beats the Mavic 3 in video definition. Amazing little dtone!

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes it does!
      Perfectly agree

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@VICVideopIC I even made a video on the technical part talking about and showing why the Nano + has better image quality than the Mavic 3. Nano+ has better glass/lens, better aperture, better sensors with more pixel density, RYYB filter to allow around 40% more light, 50Mps active pixels and better conversion from electrical voltages to digital data.

  • @grahamniven
    @grahamniven 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Completely amazing results from the Nano+ camera.
    A great shame that its performance in windy conditions isn't too great.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi Graham, I agree.
      Sadly wind resistance is a price to pay for remaining below 250 grams

    • @msjj000
      @msjj000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve not had the wind related issues, it’s been a fantastic drone

  • @stefcarlos5369
    @stefcarlos5369 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bellissima comparazione, molto convincente e da possessore di un Nano+ non posso che confermare le tue riflessioni. Spesso dico che avere questa qualità in un drone da 249g, con tutte le restrizioni che abbiamo in Italia ed in Europa, è semplicemente straordinario!!!

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Grazie Stef,
      questo drone non smette di stupirmi!

  • @smithtv1110
    @smithtv1110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But in reality, flight performance matters. I wish Autel can improve on that aspect and give us much more reliable flight performance like the Air 2S.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I perfectly agree,
      wind resistance is the weak point of the Nano Plus. A sub 250 grams drone will never have the same power of the Air 2S

    • @jimig399
      @jimig399 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Autel camera systems seem superior to DJI in every way. I have an old Autel X-star premium and the camera is incredible but the drones flight character leaves a lot to be desired. DJI really did it right with all the added ergonomic details that Autel lacks. It's a bit frustrating to find out that your control sticks and your aux cable do not store anywhere conveniently with the Autel drones...even the latest iterations. Also little things like once folded you can still add/remove SD card and battery with DJI... Autel you cannot. Control sticks can be removed but you must store them separately. Seems like Autel is being belligerent about borrowing from DJI with regard to standardizing the control stick and aux cord storage in the frame of the RC. It just feels right and it works. Why fight it. And my final 2¢ is everyone thinks DJI Geo fencing is difficult? ...wrong. I rarely have a no launch situation with my DJI drones. I've had more than a dozen "no launch" scenarios with my Autel drone. Granted not all related to geo fencing but still I could not fly my drone when I was out to specifically fly a drone...and that is always disappointing. The older Autel products have cold start issues and need to be warmed up if the temperature is below 32°F. 🤠

    • @msjj000
      @msjj000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not had any issues with the Nano+, it’s been great

  • @paulmurray4106
    @paulmurray4106 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Vic...... Very Informative And Helpful My Friend....

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Paul, I appreciate!

    • @paulmurray4106
      @paulmurray4106 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC I Have Been Flying With DJI For Years With Most Of All Their Models. Currently The Air 2s Is My Go To Drone. Just Ordered The Autel Nano Plus And Looking Forward To See How It Fly's And NO GEO FENCING....

  • @GizmoDrones
    @GizmoDrones 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison

  • @alehax27
    @alehax27 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The nano plus footage looks to have higher contrast which gives the illusion of more detail

  • @gimbalair
    @gimbalair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So its time to sell my Mini2 and Air2S but what about wind resistance, the Autel didnt do well

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wind resistance was very poor at the beginning.
      It is a little better now after firmware upgrade. More or less the same as the Mini 2 now

    • @msjj000
      @msjj000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve had no problem with this

  • @MarcelloScotti
    @MarcelloScotti 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thx for a great video !!

  • @barryp8145
    @barryp8145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunately it just doesn’t have the stability of the bigger drones.

  • @gekoldronevideos
    @gekoldronevideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and comparison👍👌The Nano+ blows the Air2S out of the water😀The colors of the Air2S look dull while the Nano+ colors look crispy. I myself have the Autel Nano+ and the DJI Mini 2 and the difference is the same. Autel camera quality beats all DJI drones including the Mavic 3 in my opinion. See my latest video on my YT channel flying the Nano+ over water in strong winds with the Freewell ND 32 filter. I was blowing away by the quality of this small and light sub. 250 gr. drone. Keep making this great comparisons. Greetings from a subscriber from 🇳🇱

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you,
      I will release my comparison with the Mavic 3 tomorrow.
      Excellent footage in your video!

    • @gekoldronevideos
      @gekoldronevideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC, thank you. I will watch you’re comparison video with the Mavic 3 tomorrow with interest. Greetings from 🇳🇱

  • @user-jy4ix7dj7p
    @user-jy4ix7dj7p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not a fan of the colors on the Nano plus. It hurts my eyes. LOL Don’t need another expensive drone when Air 2S delivers.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember when I got the Air 2S I found the colors beautiful, especially in photography

  • @droneheaven7507
    @droneheaven7507 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If u want quad Bayer sensor sharpness buy the mavic air 2 so much cheaper and it's good

  • @NigeriaFunk
    @NigeriaFunk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow!

  • @TommyGrofcsik
    @TommyGrofcsik 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like you overprocessed most of the Nano footage and didn't process the Air 2s footage to the same degree if at all. after about the 3rd example from the Air 2s it looks like you didn't process it at all.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I must admit that I have had issues with this video, due to a conflict of Premiere Pro with the graphic card.
      I had to delay publishing by one week and I had to reprocess all clips practically blindly, as Premiere would not display them and I could only see the results after encoding.
      I have changed the graphic card since

    • @jimanderson4865
      @jimanderson4865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah....I don't believe the Air 2s can be that far off.

    • @TommyGrofcsik
      @TommyGrofcsik 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VICVideopIC honestly you didn't do the Nano any favors also. Many of the Nano clips the shadows look way too over processed, almost like you have a a negative gamma filter on it or something. I enjoy your videos though, I've been using DaVinci Resolve. It's free and supposedly has the best color-grading tools.

  • @ismailbahri6047
    @ismailbahri6047 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    oke

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HHowdy?! splendid , see you later, :)

  • @drewdyess9241
    @drewdyess9241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer the Air 2S prolly because the Nano footage looks unnatural.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      THe footage from the Air 2S is indeed very nice

  • @jesusgjchuza6491
    @jesusgjchuza6491 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super 😎🤟🏼

  • @graphguy
    @graphguy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    mini2 only wins once - price

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right,
      it certainly wins for price

  • @_arturjutkowiak_film
    @_arturjutkowiak_film 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Autel has terrible, oversharpened image. Its footage is useless. Air 2s wins easily.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is true, the Autel Nano Plus has very sharp images, several users think they are too sharp, other love them.
      The footage of the Air 2s is sensational even by today's standards

    • @_arturjutkowiak_film
      @_arturjutkowiak_film 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VICVideopIC Even Evo 2 pro is over sharpened.

  • @darrellbrown7381
    @darrellbrown7381 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    To each his own, coz for me the colors on Air2S look more natural.

    • @VICVideopIC
      @VICVideopIC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, I always found the colors of the Air 2S really nice, even more so for photos

  • @terryshrives8322
    @terryshrives8322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Autel beats it all day long in my opinion