Wow what an amazing guest better than anyone except kishore mahbubani in Singapore and the fact that he’s I think a western Frenchman I’m actually shocked at his in depth and accurate analysis on the Asian/Chinese view of the modern world and how it’s actually viewed by them but also the global south 😂😊🎉👍🏾😧🧐👀🙏🏾🥳 congrats someone with an actual brain 😅
The guest certainly has some interesting observation on China. Mark ended up by saying that China presents huge problems but as far as I could tell such problems were not articulated in the discussion. Perhaps the book answers that question.
38 minutes in. China has no specific intentions or aims according to these fellas. I don't think I've heard them mention the words India, Japan, Korea, or Taiwan. Maybe they'll find a way in the last seven minutes?
Some ~strategic remarks: Bankers are much better in direct ways, about 6!(six) times, than in casu actual China's GOV ~ stimulating/repairing < historical/actual knowledges as to persons resp business, while about 60!(sixty) years ago STATE/Financial-Stimulations after ca 2!(two) years the Economy entered, at present timespans rather are measured in months or lesser times; China's 20th Congress openly had other meanings as to World hegemony than China's Gov global propagates (~ multi-polar); Not continental Taiwan, within at present China's social-financial-economical-ecological problems, not only political is used as outsider but also ~Sources of Western Successes; By the way, "USoA/Kissinger" never international-political gave [with exception(s)? the USoA] global acceptable "Solutions", maintaining only ~imperialistic, nowadays disasters?: e.g. as to Latin America: Citrus Wars [with USoA/President's friend]; Democratic chosen Chili Own People-President + By fearing domino-effect, USoA/GOV stays Latin ~colonial; Quod non? [P.S.: So ipso STANDARD = ONLY!! YT-Reply/Responses maybe be read !!]
E Pluribus Unum vs. Heavenly Mandated; one minor issue, that piece of heaven apparently picked a NPD. As they say over there, the same water carries the boat also flips it.
“U.S. Congress”. It has all the instability and lack of (collective/organizational) self-awareness that I’d expect from a teenager. (Yes, I’m a citizen. Yes, I live here.) But. If you spot an actual teenager doing that sort of self-contradictory stuff, sometimes you can persuade them to talk out a conflict to themselves instead of letting the mood of the moment push them around? That’s an actual dialectic, and useful things can come out of it. I have no such faith that the current (or next) crop of elected officials will be able to pull off that task.
That entity does have a few adolescent minds but there are also grownup in the room who don’t eliminate the kids with different thinking, under the motto OUT OF MANY COMES ONE; On the contrary its adversary eliminates or reforms different ideas physically to acquire unsustainable unity that justifies its inconsistency as dialectic. On the path forward, the later is obviously lagging behind, has to enter and merge out of chaos 😂😂😂
Wow what an amazing guest better than anyone except kishore mahbubani in Singapore and the fact that he’s I think a western Frenchman I’m actually shocked at his in depth and accurate analysis on the Asian/Chinese view of the modern world and how it’s actually viewed by them but also the global south 😂😊🎉👍🏾😧🧐👀🙏🏾🥳 congrats someone with an actual brain 😅
Very thoughtful conversation.
fact that China had risen are in itself already a benefit to the rest of the world, by checking the old hegemon into behaving.
The guest certainly has some interesting observation on China. Mark ended up by saying that China presents huge problems but as far as I could tell such problems were not articulated in the discussion. Perhaps the book answers that question.
38 minutes in. China has no specific intentions or aims according to these fellas. I don't think I've heard them mention the words India, Japan, Korea, or Taiwan. Maybe they'll find a way in the last seven minutes?
Some ~strategic remarks:
Bankers are much better in direct ways, about 6!(six) times, than in casu actual China's GOV ~ stimulating/repairing < historical/actual knowledges as to persons resp business,
while about 60!(sixty) years ago STATE/Financial-Stimulations after ca 2!(two) years the Economy entered, at present timespans rather are measured in months or lesser times;
China's 20th Congress openly had other meanings as to World hegemony than China's Gov global propagates (~ multi-polar);
Not continental Taiwan, within at present China's social-financial-economical-ecological problems, not only political is used as outsider but also ~Sources of Western Successes;
By the way, "USoA/Kissinger" never international-political gave [with exception(s)? the USoA] global acceptable "Solutions", maintaining only ~imperialistic, nowadays disasters?:
e.g. as to Latin America: Citrus Wars [with USoA/President's friend]; Democratic chosen Chili Own People-President + By fearing domino-effect, USoA/GOV stays Latin ~colonial;
Quod non?
[P.S.: So ipso STANDARD = ONLY!! YT-Reply/Responses maybe be read !!]
A curious 46 minute opinion piece that skates around many problematic issues to paint China as a viable alternative to the west…
Works amd harvesting logo
How would you describe an adolescent child mood swings, dialectic?😂😂😂
E Pluribus Unum vs. Heavenly Mandated; one minor issue, that piece of heaven apparently picked a NPD. As they say over there, the same water carries the boat also flips it.
“U.S. Congress”. It has all the instability and lack of (collective/organizational) self-awareness that I’d expect from a teenager. (Yes, I’m a citizen. Yes, I live here.)
But.
If you spot an actual teenager doing that sort of self-contradictory stuff, sometimes you can persuade them to talk out a conflict to themselves instead of letting the mood of the moment push them around? That’s an actual dialectic, and useful things can come out of it. I have no such faith that the current (or next) crop of elected officials will be able to pull off that task.
That entity does have a few adolescent minds but there are also grownup in the room who don’t eliminate the kids with different thinking, under the motto OUT OF MANY COMES ONE; On the contrary its adversary eliminates or reforms different ideas physically to acquire unsustainable unity that justifies its inconsistency as dialectic. On the path forward, the later is obviously lagging behind, has to enter and merge out of chaos 😂😂😂