Did anyone notice the media asking questions about an immediate effect on energy bills. Wished they asked the same about the immediate effect of brexit with the same urgency. Immediate positives for labour, long-term maybes for conservatives.
Standing charge is he biggest problem with bills. It disproportionately affects poorer people. Regards Brexit, we are not in a position yet to rejoin ✌️
@@bereal6590Absolutely agree that the standing charge needs to be immediately frozen, in the short term dramatically reduced and in the long term abolished. There is an argument that says that we can't afford to wait to start the process of rejoining the EU too long.
@@tatata1543 Why rush? They have 5 glorious years. You could always pledge to donate any savings that you make to a charity. That might actually mean something, rather than just expecting a miracle in 2 weeks. You seemed fine waiting 15 years for the last lot to do something for the under privileged
That won't ever happen because as long as just one person has gas then it's still the most expensive form of energy and will keep the prices high for everything else. There needs to be tax on energy providers who are racking in the profits when gas prices are high.
@@jackbartholomew3941 we’re actually faster growing economy in G7 and number 4 in export of financial services. He wants to nationalise rail. Thank Brexit
You are having a laugh right! The word competent does not apply to this unelected government. Labour The party for nothing that rigged votes to win GE is incompetent. Starmer is a disaster
@@TRUTHDISTRIBUTIONNETWORK We won't know who's the fool until we see how things go under this government. If it goes well then you'll be the fool. Just have to sit back and see what happens
2 หลายเดือนก่อน
@@TRUTHDISTRIBUTIONNETWORKit must be hard being so bitter
I commend the ‘energy’ Labour are bringing to this desperate problem, that is supplying affordable U.K. based clean energy to households and businesses. Such challenges as generation, supply chains, delivery networks, commercial practices, skills shortages both technical and commercial. All this will require folk to work more effectively and collaboratively, not just put more hours in. My experience of the U.K. private sector leadership suggests a 20th century attitude to solving business problems and exploiting opportunities we don’t lack education and intellect, but ambition. Our private sector leaders are mainly accountants more interested in reducing risk and cutting costs. Training and development is regards as overhead, and seen as a perk, except for mandated or politically expedient training ( e.g health and safety and DEI). We have a generation coming into the workplace who struggle with collaboration, lacking fundamental social skills AND in my opinion across the board we have a woeful lack of basic business skills including, negotiation, leading teams, understanding basic finance, recruitment, top talent development. These issues are the Achilles heels of the Labours Mission Driven Government. Without using world class resources to increase personal productivity, their mission will fail.
@@996o0o966 Where did I say anything about increasing bills? I’m querying the fact they are telling us they would get lower. Unfortunately it all gets a bit hazy when it comes to exactly how that will happen. Ultimately my point is I’ve heard it all before, this is just the usual routine of how they sell whatever it is they are selling, it’s exactly what happened with water privatisation and look at the mess that is in.
With the uk being such a small footprint and the power houses like China, India and America blasting through fossil fuels and sourcing energy on the cheap all we are doing is increasing costs and taxes for the British people.
@@mitchSwimsJust because others aren't doing what's necessary doesn't mean we shouldn't. We should be leading on sustainability, inventing and producing new tech and exporting it to those countries. Investment in sustainable home-grown electricity also means we're not beholden to the fossil fuel producers (Putin et al) and can lower our fuel bills. Wish there was more talk about tidal though as an island nation, surely there's more scope for that rather than just wind and solar
I am f'ing crying here again- everytime I listen to this Labour Government I am filled with hope again. Building, investing, our own security, well-paid jobs- the UK is crying our for these things.
I’m still none the wiser as to exactly how bills will be lower . It seems to me this is just PFI redux. We hand over public cash , derisk the private sector investment and they take all the profits.
We’re allocating resources to sectors that we find more profitable and important to fund. That’s all this really is. It’s a kind of direct subsidy. Think of it more like a tax break vs. Something like how we tax tobacco to discourage its use.
At last we're on the path towards being a renewable energy superpower. I'm sure a lot of people take the word superpower with a bucket of salt, but what it means is this: Once we have enough generation and energy storage capacity to get us through the worst weeks of winter when it's freezing and the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing, just think how much excess capacity we'll have on a hot, sunny, windy day in summer. We'll have so much we'll have to come up with ways to use it - sell it abroad, make hydrogen/ammonia, desalinate water - the list is endless.
I'm absolutely loving the Karma and and the irony of Farage and his racist, bigoted attitude and enablers, giving the Labour party the strongest mandate for decades, strong enough to make the changes that they are so against!
The problem with making steel is the cost of energy is too, high so yes the steel industry is finished and there isn't anything the government can do about it, unless of course for some reason the cost of energy magically comes down.
Energy bills in the immediacy i understood that this could take years to achieve…. Will labour tax the energy company’s ….or consider in the short term especially winter coming the cost of energy …
These politicians have revived £ from Green Tech that provides no environmental benefit (wind/solar) & is only financially viable without Govt subsidies
All money the royal family earn, we get back, minus their fixed amount per year. If the royal estate make more money, we get 100% of that increase as their income is fixed by law. It's actually a really clever strategy to keep as much money for taxpayers as possible
Not convinced by this at all. Where is the infrastructure for such a company . I have come to the conclusion that this is just a company that sells energy to us.
As far as I know it's a plan to jointly invest in energy projects with private companies. That makes it less expensive for both sides. Like shared ownership of a house.
@@Baxwell. So where is the energy coming from? Right now the big energy companies drill for oil and gas and they have infrastructure to sell on the open market place. As far as I know, the government is not capable of such capabilities and activities. They also don’t have the CAPEX to build any other energy infrastructure. As far as renewables are concerned, again, they do not have the capability nor the CAPEX to do this work. Even if they did it would take tens of years to complete such an endeavor . This is why I am skeptical. There is a reason why the oil and gas companies exist. To do this work.
@@anonymoushuman8962 If the goal is to generate more of our energy from sustainable sources, then it's cheaper for the UK to build grid-connected wind and solar farms if we go halves with private companies that already have the skilled workforce.
Cutting taxes and investing in nothing has worked a treat the last 10 years and every other time its been tried. People like you swallow the magic money tree line without ever wondering WHY there is no money. You vote Tory and then the rich get richer and we get told "sorry wallets empty".
I guess you would have liked to see Starmer running about with schematics for a new nuclear power plant, dawning a helmet, workbooks and carrying trowel? He's just told you that he's lifted laws preventing clean energy and is creating a Great British Energy team. People like you don't live in the real world or just like to moan.
Did anyone notice the media asking questions about an immediate effect on energy bills.
Wished they asked the same about the immediate effect of brexit with the same urgency.
Immediate positives for labour, long-term maybes for conservatives.
Standing charge is he biggest problem with bills. It disproportionately affects poorer people. Regards Brexit, we are not in a position yet to rejoin ✌️
@@bereal6590Absolutely agree that the standing charge needs to be immediately frozen, in the short term dramatically reduced and in the long term abolished.
There is an argument that says that we can't afford to wait to start the process of rejoining the EU too long.
@@simonpaine2347This government apparently is in no rush to do either of those things.
@@tatata1543 Why rush? They have 5 glorious years. You could always pledge to donate any savings that you make to a charity. That might actually mean something, rather than just expecting a miracle in 2 weeks. You seemed fine waiting 15 years for the last lot to do something for the under privileged
@@simonpaine2347 Also, savings from what?
Wait what… his dad was a tool maker! ❤
He kept that quiet.
Once we get more renewables we need to stop the wholesale prices using the highest cost of generation as the basis for our bills.
Yea, they are not going to do that.
That’ll happen once we have near 100% renewables. It can’t come quickly enough!
That won't ever happen because as long as just one person has gas then it's still the most expensive form of energy and will keep the prices high for everything else.
There needs to be tax on energy providers who are racking in the profits when gas prices are high.
@@JGS123WRPTP It won’t be here soon, I wouldn’t hold your breath
@@JGS123WRPTP I work in energy and we consult with experts frequently. Their opinion is gas will still make up 19% of our generation by 2030.
Finally some level headed informed leadership 🙌 🎉
Really? It seems very light on detail to me, not “informed” at all.
@@tatata1543So lets go back to some strong and stable and oven ready Brexit deals because that worked so well
@@jackbartholomew3941 Let’s not. What has that to do with this?
@@jackbartholomew3941 we’re actually faster growing economy in G7 and number 4 in export of financial services. He wants to nationalise rail. Thank Brexit
So funny, in 20 years you’ll laugh at yourself
Is there a website i can look at for the GB-Energy info n stuff?
Nope, it’s all a bit (deliberately?) vague.
@@tatata1543no it’s not 🤣
There is, google Great British Energy.
Probably a press release on gov uk
It is so nice to have a competent government in, that from the looks of it actually have a long term plan.
yeah we can all talk $hit and old ed here, Has a degree in talking $hit.... I'm sorry for those who are so easily fooled.
You are having a laugh right! The word competent does not apply to this unelected government. Labour The party for nothing that rigged votes to win GE is incompetent. Starmer is a disaster
@@TRUTHDISTRIBUTIONNETWORK We won't know who's the fool until we see how things go under this government. If it goes well then you'll be the fool. Just have to sit back and see what happens
@@TRUTHDISTRIBUTIONNETWORKit must be hard being so bitter
😂 are you new around here ?
About time we had this momentum behind our energy policy.
I commend the ‘energy’ Labour are bringing to this desperate problem, that is supplying affordable U.K. based clean energy to households and businesses. Such challenges as generation, supply chains, delivery networks, commercial practices, skills shortages both technical and commercial. All this will require folk to work more effectively and collaboratively, not just put more hours in. My experience of the U.K. private sector leadership suggests a 20th century attitude to solving business problems and exploiting opportunities we don’t lack education and intellect, but ambition. Our private sector leaders are mainly accountants more interested in reducing risk and cutting costs. Training and development is regards as overhead, and seen as a perk, except for mandated or politically expedient training ( e.g health and safety and DEI). We have a generation coming into the workplace who struggle with collaboration, lacking fundamental social skills AND in my opinion across the board we have a woeful lack of basic business skills including, negotiation, leading teams, understanding basic finance, recruitment, top talent development. These issues are the Achilles heels of the Labours Mission Driven Government. Without using world class resources to increase personal productivity, their mission will fail.
Well done Kier 👏👏👊
It took him thirty seconds before he mentioned that his father was a toolmaker.
Is that a new record? Can anyone verify?
Lol, but it is relevant to be fair
His father certainly made a tool.
May as well voted for KLAUS Schwab.
We DID!
Ignoring science will see us through.
This reminds me of when we were told nationalising utilities would mean lower bills. That was a lie and I suspect this is too.
Can you explain why they would make a plan that they, in your opinion, know would increase bills? That doesn't seem very logical
@@996o0o966 Where did I say anything about increasing bills? I’m querying the fact they are telling us they would get lower. Unfortunately it all gets a bit hazy when it comes to exactly how that will happen. Ultimately my point is I’ve heard it all before, this is just the usual routine of how they sell whatever it is they are selling, it’s exactly what happened with water privatisation and look at the mess that is in.
Where did I say anything about increased bills? They said bills would be lower without explaining how that might happen. Heard it all before.
Lies lies lies
At last a serious plan to transition. The planets hottest day on record was on Monday.
really? didnt feel that hot when i was out that day
first time im hearing about that being the hottest day
With the uk being such a small footprint and the power houses like China, India and America blasting through fossil fuels and sourcing energy on the cheap all we are doing is increasing costs and taxes for the British people.
@@mitchSwimsJust because others aren't doing what's necessary doesn't mean we shouldn't. We should be leading on sustainability, inventing and producing new tech and exporting it to those countries. Investment in sustainable home-grown electricity also means we're not beholden to the fossil fuel producers (Putin et al) and can lower our fuel bills.
Wish there was more talk about tidal though as an island nation, surely there's more scope for that rather than just wind and solar
@@Kromodenit was the hottest day on record globally, so the UK temperature profile is just a small factor.
I am f'ing crying here again- everytime I listen to this Labour Government I am filled with hope again. Building, investing, our own security, well-paid jobs- the UK is crying our for these things.
Tidal energy the ebb and flow here we go...
I’m still none the wiser as to exactly how bills will be lower . It seems to me this is just PFI redux. We hand over public cash , derisk the private sector investment and they take all the profits.
We’re allocating resources to sectors that we find more profitable and important to fund. That’s all this really is. It’s a kind of direct subsidy. Think of it more like a tax break vs. Something like how we tax tobacco to discourage its use.
@@jamiewalkerdine3705 So how will it lower bills and profitable to whom?
@@jamiewalkerdine3705 That makes no sense.
What is Starmers fathers connection with making tools again? Was he a tools sales man, or a tools repair man, or a tools designer?
He owned he’s own tool making business something Starmer forgets to say but the biggest tool he ever made is now the PM
At last we're on the path towards being a renewable energy superpower. I'm sure a lot of people take the word superpower with a bucket of salt, but what it means is this:
Once we have enough generation and energy storage capacity to get us through the worst weeks of winter when it's freezing and the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing, just think how much excess capacity we'll have on a hot, sunny, windy day in summer. We'll have so much we'll have to come up with ways to use it - sell it abroad, make hydrogen/ammonia, desalinate water - the list is endless.
I'm absolutely loving the Karma and and the irony of Farage and his racist, bigoted attitude and enablers, giving the Labour party the strongest mandate for decades, strong enough to make the changes that they are so against!
What about our steel industry?
It’s finished.
The problem with making steel is the cost of energy is too, high so yes the steel industry is finished and there isn't anything the government can do about it, unless of course for some reason the cost of energy magically comes down.
It’s so nice having adults finally in charge.
The whole “adults in charge” thing is getting tedious now. Do you people work from a script?
@@tatata1543 His dad was a tool maker.
@@UkSapyy He kept that quiet 🙂.
goodness gracious ! how awfully embarrassing for you 😂
Hi 😊👋
Finally some infrastructure!!
Energy bills in the immediacy i understood that this could take years to achieve…. Will labour tax the energy company’s ….or consider in the short term especially winter coming the cost of energy …
My gas electric bill is £220 a month £55 of that is green energy tax that's £660 a yeartax and he's going to save me £300 labour economics at its best
Well she doesn't mind Ed Miliband, does she?
These politicians have revived £ from Green Tech that provides no environmental benefit (wind/solar) & is only financially viable without Govt subsidies
Talking about his dad again
❤🎉
Sounds like a new Labour tory type con to transfer more money to the royal family and private companies.
All money the royal family earn, we get back, minus their fixed amount per year. If the royal estate make more money, we get 100% of that increase as their income is fixed by law. It's actually a really clever strategy to keep as much money for taxpayers as possible
My dad is a toolmaker
Starmer bingo!
You all needs to leave undemocratic ECHR NOW
Ok bot
The yellow jackets remind me of one more time ,sorry
Wait... Kier Starmers dad was a tool maker?
A whanker maker
Labours making all the right noises
"This government isn't driven by ideology" pwahahaha
Nationalise GB News....and close it down
You don’t think those with differing opinions should have a platform?
I really don’t like these turbines though ❤
Labour we will save you £300 on your energy bills I think they meant you will pay £300 more on your bills
Alright grandpa, back to bed please
Compelling argument.
Not convinced by this at all.
Where is the infrastructure for such a company
.
I have come to the conclusion that this is just a company that sells energy to us.
As far as I know it's a plan to jointly invest in energy projects with private companies. That makes it less expensive for both sides. Like shared ownership of a house.
@@Baxwell.
So where is the energy coming from?
Right now the big energy companies drill for oil and gas and they have infrastructure to sell on the open market place.
As far as I know, the government is not capable of such capabilities and activities. They also don’t have the CAPEX to build any other energy infrastructure.
As far as renewables are concerned, again, they do not have the capability nor the CAPEX to do this work. Even if they did it would take tens of years to complete such an endeavor
.
This is why I am skeptical. There is a reason why the oil and gas companies exist. To do this work.
@@anonymoushuman8962 If the goal is to generate more of our energy from sustainable sources, then it's cheaper for the UK to build grid-connected wind and solar farms if we go halves with private companies that already have the skilled workforce.
I can't be bothered to watch this. Did he say anything worth while?
What a crock...... who actually believes this BS
I hope you were saying the same everytime Sunak, Cameron, Johnson, Truss were talking over the last decade.
@@dougclark9921 believe you me l was
I do not want to pay for those
Then leave
@@bereal6590 to where?
What about given a speech on cutting income tax from 20% down 10% instead talking utter rubbish
What services would you cut to fund that reduction? NHS? Education?
OK reform voter....
Cutting taxes and investing in nothing has worked a treat the last 10 years and every other time its been tried. People like you swallow the magic money tree line without ever wondering WHY there is no money. You vote Tory and then the rich get richer and we get told "sorry wallets empty".
@@enjoysilence4146this is the problem with reform uk voters
You vill own nosink and be happy 😂😢
Witty and original...
Empty words , bul....t after bul....t after bul....t . Unbelievable people believe in that .
I guess you would have liked to see Starmer running about with schematics for a new nuclear power plant, dawning a helmet, workbooks and carrying trowel? He's just told you that he's lifted laws preventing clean energy and is creating a Great British Energy team. People like you don't live in the real world or just like to moan.
Which part don't you believe?
Just another Russian bot