there is the same amount of "momentum" forwards "backwards" or inverse or mirrored etc. so if you define time as movement of the wave function rather than entropy. this resolves time parity. there is the same amount of momentum regardless of configuration "forwards" and "backwards".
Dr. turoks point about it gets simpler as it goes out. Therefore there can be no multi-verse is a correlation does not provide causation argument. In our cosmological model, there could be room for it to get simpler simpler and simpler before it reaches another universe and becomes more complicated and complex. Universe is don’t have to medially bump up against one another or interact with each other in anyway. there could be millions of universe’s worth of space between them as hilbert space is “infinite”. So not a strong argument.
There are different interpretations of the term "multiverse", many of which don't necessarily require a single, spatially infinite model (eg. so called "many worlds" quantum models). But your point is valid. I think it simply points to the fact that infinite spatial cosmological models allow for infinite solutions. Perhaps then it's better to focus our attention on more "local" cosmological models that are more concerned with the properties of our own universe. I see a certain elegance in a local cosmological model based on what we know about the properties of light. If light does not experience time, then light could be thought of as a timeless framework or blueprint that matter then follows. The speed at which this plays out is what we observe as the speed of light. The elegance of this model is that it provides an explanation for the constant speed of light, and resolves apparent causation problems such as those encountered in Wheeler's galaxy thought experiment.
I agree with "does not provide causation argument" for a multiverse. I found this to be a lazy reference by Neil akin to the priest just saying it so it is. I just wanted to add that there is no reason why there should be ANY noticing of other universes. Multiple universes may be mutually exclusive, I always assumed so, otherwise I am not sure why they would be "other" universes.
Empirical & unapologetic data succinctly referred to as #finetuning strongly suggests that, since it all had a beginning... and in that instant-faster than seeing the "i" the word-so called cosmological constants achieved values which are highly improbable to be simply accidental... the "hint" is deafening: intelligent & deliberate design. #Psalm19v1
I’m afraid that is wishful thinking with no valid and verified evidence to support it. The ramblings of Bronze age people do not count as evidence of anything!
In the model that was published under the name “natural Philosophy” authored by helical, published by Newman springs publishing; The Big Bang arose as a result of one of four possible causal mechanisms, first casual mechanism is the weakness of gravity, the second is the merger of two singularities, the third is dissipation of energy resulting in the sudden expansion, Lastly size becomes to big. How would these models fit your early universe?
how about heat fuel and oxygen go bang. how's that for simple. the first 7 atoms formed aswell as the last . there was friction before 8 came along. then carbon and the rest from the pressure on both sides. like we see naturally happen all the time. just bigger.
i am thinking about time. if zero is infinity and one is dead stop, everything in between is a variable. the idea here is that time is conditional, local, universal and intradimensional. imagine time to exist where there is nothing and also everything. gravity then becomes an exponent of applied time in our universe. this idea allows for time to exist before and after; and inside and outside our universe. were I to divide zero and force its action of division into a klien bottle, we would geometrically arrive at our universe. if use time as a base line i could say that zero divided by any value of time equals a function of singularity, or 0/T=U for universe. Add the dimensional aspect of zero 'D' to prevent infinity and I get Dx0/T=U. during the function any division of zero would produce 2 dimensions of finite composition. so it becomes a value equation to arrive at the exact use of the function Dx0/T=U to get our universe as it is, slightly unbalanced, flat ( flat as time moving forwards) and stable.
gravity is time dialation. not cause and effect. 10 dimentions of mass based on density of wavelength. atomic number and position in fractorial. time dialates with density. that's why the sky is blue. and sunsets red.
how's this for simplicity. I can unify gravity with everything and I mean everything I can find. from the big bang to blue sky. if you think you can find something . please try. it's really simple to understand. so finding a flaw should be easy.
Neutron decay cosmology The path of least action, physical process solution to black hole paradoxes, dark energy, dark matter and critical density maintenance. A homeostatic universe maintained via the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. Neutrons in at event horizons. Drop kinetic energy off as mass for event horizon. The neutron takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space, a deep void somewhere. There the neutron decays Into DM, creating DE. Free neutrons decay into amorphous monatomic hydrogen. Dark matter. Cross section 10-³¹ barn. The decay from 0.6fm³ neutron to one cubic meter of hydrogen has is a volume increase, expansion, of 10⁴⁵. Dark energy. I'm time the has stabilizes and coalesces into everything we see on a constant flow towards an event horizon. Neutron decay cosmology. Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. The Hubble Doppler is an artifact of the curvature of space time we expect to see, in there only dimension it can manifest, the frequency dimension. 🖖
The expanding electrons do it all. A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding makes a hydrogen atom. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. All EMR also. Start at start. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon. Done 20 years ago: try to keep up.
@@davidharvey3743 The electron mass is 9.11- multiplied by 1836 equals the proton mass- 1.67. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. Expanding electrons/atoms do it all. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. All Standard Theory/Model replaced by Expansion Theory. No energy, charge, photons, waves, spin, fields, potential, quantum,quarks, space, time, space-time, etc. all fairy tales like epicycles unworthy of pursuing. Progress. Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object: gravity; d=1/2at^2 major part of the gravity equation. All atoms and atomic objects are expanding at 1/770,000th their size per second per second constant acceleration: multiplied by earth’s radius equals 16 feet; the distance an object “falls”. Etc. Read the referenced book.
My right ear thanks you.
Neil is awesome in his explanation of his work and it is greatly appreciated. Thank you for sharing. Peace
Thank you youtube for the recommendation.
Indeed
They gotta throw you a bone every now and then
Ditto! ^.^
Thank you for posting these on TH-cam. It’s great.
I like NT's new approach.
Superb, as always. ❤ Neil Turok
Love Dr. Turok.
brilliant.
there is the same amount of "momentum" forwards "backwards" or inverse or mirrored etc. so if you define time as movement of the wave function rather than entropy. this resolves time parity. there is the same amount of momentum regardless of configuration "forwards" and "backwards".
Dr. turoks point about it gets simpler as it goes out. Therefore there can be no multi-verse is a correlation does not provide causation argument.
In our cosmological model, there could be room for it to get simpler simpler and simpler before it reaches another universe and becomes more complicated and complex. Universe is don’t have to medially bump up against one another or interact with each other in anyway. there could be millions of universe’s worth of space between them as hilbert space is “infinite”. So not a strong argument.
There are different interpretations of the term "multiverse", many of which don't necessarily require a single, spatially infinite model (eg. so called "many worlds" quantum models).
But your point is valid. I think it simply points to the fact that infinite spatial cosmological models allow for infinite solutions. Perhaps then it's better to focus our attention on more "local" cosmological models that are more concerned with the properties of our own universe.
I see a certain elegance in a local cosmological model based on what we know about the properties of light. If light does not experience time, then light could be thought of as a timeless framework or blueprint that matter then follows. The speed at which this plays out is what we observe as the speed of light.
The elegance of this model is that it provides an explanation for the constant speed of light, and resolves apparent causation problems such as those encountered in Wheeler's galaxy thought experiment.
I agree with "does not provide causation argument" for a multiverse. I found this to be a lazy reference by Neil akin to the priest just saying it so it is. I just wanted to add that there is no reason why there should be ANY noticing of other universes. Multiple universes may be mutually exclusive, I always assumed so, otherwise I am not sure why they would be "other" universes.
Empirical & unapologetic data succinctly referred to as #finetuning strongly suggests that, since it all had a beginning... and in that instant-faster than seeing the "i" the word-so called cosmological constants achieved values which are highly improbable to be simply accidental... the "hint" is deafening: intelligent & deliberate design. #Psalm19v1
I’m afraid that is wishful thinking with no valid and verified evidence to support it. The ramblings of Bronze age people do not count as evidence of anything!
cosmosses made simple--hooray
In the model that was published under the name “natural Philosophy” authored by helical, published by Newman springs publishing;
The Big Bang arose as a result of one of four possible causal mechanisms, first casual mechanism is the weakness of gravity, the second is the merger of two singularities, the third is dissipation of energy resulting in the sudden expansion, Lastly size becomes to big. How would these models fit your early universe?
how about heat fuel and oxygen go bang. how's that for simple. the first 7 atoms formed aswell as the last . there was friction before 8 came along. then carbon and the rest from the pressure on both sides. like we see naturally happen all the time. just bigger.
@@atticuswalker can you try to clarify what you mean?
@@helicalactual th-cam.com/video/2cqTZcLmxFs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=uYn4JdBcRufQ_ghp
I made
So annoying that audio is only left ch, not stereo o
You have your headphones on backwards.hehe
i am thinking about time. if zero is infinity and one is dead stop, everything in between is a variable. the idea here is that time is conditional, local, universal and intradimensional. imagine time to exist where there is nothing and also everything. gravity then becomes an exponent of applied time in our universe. this idea allows for time to exist before and after; and inside and outside our universe. were I to divide zero and force its action of division into a klien bottle, we would geometrically arrive at our universe. if use time as a base line i could say that zero divided by any value of time equals a function of singularity, or 0/T=U for universe. Add the dimensional aspect of zero 'D' to prevent infinity and I get Dx0/T=U. during the function any division of zero would produce 2 dimensions of finite composition. so it becomes a value equation to arrive at the exact use of the function Dx0/T=U to get our universe as it is, slightly unbalanced, flat ( flat as time moving forwards) and stable.
gravity is time dialation. not cause and effect. 10 dimentions of mass based on density of wavelength. atomic number and position in fractorial.
time dialates with density. that's why the sky is blue. and sunsets red.
Vr = zero point and the apex of the Space vortex.
Vl = zero point and the apex of the Counterspace vortex.
,simply NOTHING is SIMPLE .. .
how's this for simplicity. I can unify gravity with everything and I mean everything I can find. from the big bang to blue sky. if you think you can find something . please try. it's really simple to understand. so finding a flaw should be easy.
Left channel audio not working.
Everything he says is right.
Works for me ?
Zero point = Condensate of Universe.
Scalable Aether Universe.
Neutron decay cosmology
The path of least action, physical process solution to black hole paradoxes, dark energy, dark matter and critical density maintenance.
A homeostatic universe maintained via the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids.
Neutrons in at event horizons.
Drop kinetic energy off as mass for event horizon.
The neutron takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space, a deep void somewhere.
There the neutron decays
Into DM, creating DE.
Free neutrons decay into amorphous monatomic hydrogen. Dark matter. Cross section 10-³¹ barn.
The decay from 0.6fm³ neutron to one cubic meter of hydrogen has is a volume increase, expansion, of 10⁴⁵. Dark energy.
I'm time the has stabilizes and coalesces into everything we see on a constant flow towards an event horizon.
Neutron decay cosmology.
Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size.
The Hubble Doppler is an artifact of the curvature of space time we expect to see, in there only dimension it can manifest, the frequency dimension.
🖖
The expanding electrons do it all. A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding makes a hydrogen atom. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. All EMR also. Start at start. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon. Done 20 years ago: try to keep up.
A proton is a collection of expanding electrons? A proton is made of quarks.
What are You talking about? " A proton is 1836 electrons" ?
@@davidharvey3743 The electron mass is 9.11- multiplied by 1836 equals the proton mass- 1.67. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. Expanding electrons/atoms do it all. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. All Standard Theory/Model replaced by Expansion Theory. No energy, charge, photons, waves, spin, fields, potential, quantum,quarks, space, time, space-time, etc. all fairy tales like epicycles unworthy of pursuing. Progress. Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object: gravity; d=1/2at^2 major part of the gravity equation. All atoms and atomic objects are expanding at 1/770,000th their size per second per second constant acceleration: multiplied by earth’s radius equals 16 feet; the distance an object “falls”. Etc. Read the referenced book.
@@davidharvey3743 a proton is 1836 times the mass of an electron. But the way you have written it is implying that a proton is made of electrons.