AlbaNova Colloquium
AlbaNova Colloquium
  • 44
  • 44 251

วีดีโอ

Albanova colloquium on multiphoton processes and related technologies - 30.05.2024
มุมมอง 112 หลายเดือนก่อน
Multiphoton Processes: Transforming an imaginative concept to high-impact technologies, from materials processing to biomedicine
"Origin of classicality in quantum spin systems" - 02.05.2024
มุมมอง 2132 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Origin of classicality in quantum spin systems" - 02.05.2024
"JWST: One Giant Leap Towards Observing the First Stars" - 25.04.2024
มุมมอง 1753 หลายเดือนก่อน
"JWST: One Giant Leap Towards Observing the First Stars" - 25.04.2024
"Engineering a quantum frontier for atomic clocks and fundamental physics" - 18.04.2024
มุมมอง 803 หลายเดือนก่อน
Lise Meitner Distinguished Lecture 2023
"From graviton scattering to black-hole quantum amplitudes in general relativity" - 04.04.2024
มุมมอง 863 หลายเดือนก่อน
"From graviton scattering to black-hole quantum amplitudes in general relativity" - 04.04.2024
Mutual neutralization and decay processes studied in DESIREE - 08.02.2024
มุมมอง 865 หลายเดือนก่อน
Mutual neutralization and decay processes studied in DESIREE - 08.02.2024
2023 Oskar Klein Memorial Lecture: Gravitational-Wave Astronomy: Theoretical Advances and Challenges
มุมมอง 958 หลายเดือนก่อน
2023 Oskar Klein Memorial Lecture: Gravitational-Wave Astronomy: Theoretical Advances and Challenges
"Imaging Supermassive Black Holes: From Still Images to Video" - 12.10.2023
มุมมอง 1579 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Imaging Supermassive Black Holes: From Still Images to Video" - 12.10.2023
"Positive solutions of parametric polynomial systems and biochemical reaction networks" - 11.10.2023
มุมมอง 319 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Positive solutions of parametric polynomial systems and biochemical reaction networks" - 11.10.2023
"Static and dynamic properties of helium droplets" - 05.10.2023
มุมมอง 289 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Static and dynamic properties of helium droplets" - 05.10.2023
"Chiral critical matter" - 28.09.2023
มุมมอง 3210 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Chiral critical matter" - 28.09.2023
"Visualizing Many Body Quantum States in Magical Flat Bands" - 21.09.2023
มุมมอง 29410 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Visualizing Many Body Quantum States in Magical Flat Bands" - 21.09.2023
"A tale of two black holes: Sgr A* and M87*" - 25.05.2023
มุมมอง 1.7Kปีที่แล้ว
"A tale of two black holes: Sgr A* and M87*" - 25.05.2023
"Quantum gravity, chaos, complexity and statistical physics" - 11.05.2023
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
"Quantum gravity, chaos, complexity and statistical physics" - 11.05.2023
"Explaining the simplicity of the cosmos" - 20.04.2023
มุมมอง 27Kปีที่แล้ว
"Explaining the simplicity of the cosmos" - 20.04.2023
"Observability of short-period rocky exoplanets" - 13.04.2023
มุมมอง 83ปีที่แล้ว
"Observability of short-period rocky exoplanets" - 13.04.2023
Lise Meitner Distinguished Lecture 2022 - 30.03.2023
มุมมอง 130ปีที่แล้ว
Lise Meitner Distinguished Lecture 2022 - 30.03.2023
Greenland ice cores tell tales on past sea level contributions - 02.03.2023
มุมมอง 114ปีที่แล้ว
Greenland ice cores tell tales on past sea level contributions - 02.03.2023
"Panel discussion with 2020 and 2021 Nobel Laureates in Physics" - 07.12.2022
มุมมอง 29ปีที่แล้ว
"Panel discussion with 2020 and 2021 Nobel Laureates in Physics" - 07.12.2022
"Seminar with 2020 and 2021 Nobel Laureates in Physics" - 07.12.2022
มุมมอง 68ปีที่แล้ว
"Seminar with 2020 and 2021 Nobel Laureates in Physics" - 07.12.2022
Active Force Patterning as an Organizing Principle in Living Cells - 01.12.2022
มุมมอง 35ปีที่แล้ว
Active Force Patterning as an Organizing Principle in Living Cells - 01.12.2022
"Non-Hermitian Topological Physics" - 24.11.2022
มุมมอง 2.9Kปีที่แล้ว
"Non-Hermitian Topological Physics" - 24.11.2022
Free boundary regularity for the obstacle problem - 02.11.2022
มุมมอง 144ปีที่แล้ว
Free boundary regularity for the obstacle problem - 02.11.2022
Manne Siegbahn Memorial Lecture 2022
มุมมอง 97ปีที่แล้ว
Manne Siegbahn Memorial Lecture 2022
"Imaging and controlling electronic motion in molecules with attosecond time resolution", 29.09.2022
มุมมอง 160ปีที่แล้ว
"Imaging and controlling electronic motion in molecules with attosecond time resolution", 29.09.2022
SMC Colloquium: "Operator Algebras and Analytic Group Theory" - 28.09.2022
มุมมอง 81ปีที่แล้ว
SMC Colloquium: "Operator Algebras and Analytic Group Theory" - 28.09.2022
Lise Meitner Lecture 2020: Quantum Simulations using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, 22.09.2022
มุมมอง 109ปีที่แล้ว
Lise Meitner Lecture 2020: Quantum Simulations using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, 22.09.2022
SMC-colloquium: Grothendieck toposes as unifying 'bridges' in Mathematics, Speaker: Olivia Caramello
มุมมอง 99ปีที่แล้ว
SMC-colloquium: Grothendieck toposes as unifying 'bridges' in Mathematics, Speaker: Olivia Caramello
Essential Ingredients for Superconductivity in Copper Oxide Superconductors - 09.06.2022
มุมมอง 1912 ปีที่แล้ว
Essential Ingredients for Superconductivity in Copper Oxide Superconductors - 09.06.2022

ความคิดเห็น

  • @palfers1
    @palfers1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your projectionist appears to be tripping balls

  • @milemarker301
    @milemarker301 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A fascinating topic, but sound quality is so poor I can't follow the speaker, which is unfortunate as the speaker is brilliant.

  • @zanakil
    @zanakil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    not the visual nor the audio rendition this conf deserved :(

  • @peterjordanson1021
    @peterjordanson1021 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One Giant Leap Towards Observing the First Stars, on giant leap backwards in electronic audio technology.

  • @atticuswalker
    @atticuswalker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how's this for simplicity. I can unify gravity with everything and I mean everything I can find. from the big bang to blue sky. if you think you can find something . please try. it's really simple to understand. so finding a flaw should be easy.

  • @ke_yhwINS
    @ke_yhwINS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ,simply NOTHING is SIMPLE .. .

  • @tomwu163
    @tomwu163 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are infinite non trivial zeroes but we know the riemann hypothesis is true for 42% of them? How does percentage of infinite numbers work? @13:06

    • @giovanni1946
      @giovanni1946 10 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      What was shown is lim inf N_0(T) / N(T) > 0.41 as T goes to infinity, where N_0(T) is the number of zeros with imaginary part <= T on the critical line, and N(T) is the number of imaginary part <= T within the critical strip

  • @azzteke
    @azzteke 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too many pages are blurred and unreadable!

  • @kquat7899
    @kquat7899 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like NT's new approach.

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Neutron decay cosmology The path of least action, physical process solution to black hole paradoxes, dark energy, dark matter and critical density maintenance. A homeostatic universe maintained via the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. Neutrons in at event horizons. Drop kinetic energy off as mass for event horizon. The neutron takes an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space, a deep void somewhere. There the neutron decays Into DM, creating DE. Free neutrons decay into amorphous monatomic hydrogen. Dark matter. Cross section 10-³¹ barn. The decay from 0.6fm³ neutron to one cubic meter of hydrogen has is a volume increase, expansion, of 10⁴⁵. Dark energy. I'm time the has stabilizes and coalesces into everything we see on a constant flow towards an event horizon. Neutron decay cosmology. Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. The Hubble Doppler is an artifact of the curvature of space time we expect to see, in there only dimension it can manifest, the frequency dimension. 🖖

  • @EulersEye
    @EulersEye 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome

  • @savage22bolt32
    @savage22bolt32 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think I'm part of the target audience, but I'll give this a try.

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual ปีที่แล้ว

    another thought, since nuclear force falls into a black hole faster, how does this not indicate "sedimentary" layers of energy. if energy is not falling in the same rate, then it cannot be uniform. why is it so bad to accept that there is a small dense bit of energy that makes it (even potentially beyond a firewall) to the singularity.

  • @halfjon
    @halfjon ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @paulsaulpaul
    @paulsaulpaul ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally have a place to start in developing my physics that have been coming to mind through divine inspiration for a while now. I believe the extra gravity measured as "dark matter" is "spiritual energy" or consciousness. I think space-time as we know it is a cross-section of what I am calling "precursor reality" where the all things are caused from. They're caused in the spirit first before manifesting in the physical/matter world. The Most High YHWH is in control of broken symmetries that give rise to matter and gravity as we see it. As well as statistical deviations from what QM predicts as well as the "chicken/egg" problems in all of physics. Einstein was right in that there are no coincidences or luck. That is, God does not play dice with the universe. Universal causality arises from the precursor reality where Gods and Angels and Demons and spirits and the dead live. There, influence is not bound by time or space or inverse square of the distance because there is no distance. I saw a Veritasium video about something called a Logistic Map that was related to fractals and chaos and to me seemed to enforce some kind of limit on the maximum of entropy of a system before it self-corrects. That wasn't the point of the video, but I took something like that from it. Been a while since I saw it. I find the channel creator insufferable, but that video in particular was inspiring given the visualizations he made. edit: I think of the spiritual analogy of a snake eating its tail with regards to chaos in a many-body system having a fundamental limit. Population limits, technology advancement limit, etc. seem to be related to this. I haven't watched your video here because it is very long and I must be in the deep prayer. I skipped through it, and I think TH-cam has finally found a diamond in the rough its put together from my semi-schizo rants (like this one; it has finally correlated the content with a proper video of topological physics that might give me a basis for my thoughts). If we could measure localized dark-matter perturbations (a feat considering the measuring device is inside the warped space-time), these would reveal spiritual or "psychic" (I hate that unholy term) energies. I'm trying to say that entropy (or lack of entropy) in any space or time is an effect of what happens within this causal precursor space. Technologies to "bridge the gap" between these worlds will be part of our lives after the wheat is separated from the chaff during the harvest of souls. Obviously, the way people act here, inverse square law with regards to influence is to remain very firmly in place. That is, no interstellar travel, no free energy, and no interstellar communication for us. No teleportation either. Because people act very unwise and unholy, self-absorbed, cannot self-govern, over indulgent, so you cannot give them free energy. What would happen first with free energy and anti-gravity? Would we boil the oceans manufacturing more silicone junk to live our unholy lifestyles through? Or would we straight-way bring an asteroid into orbit to mine for metals and build a "death-star" like device and blow up the planet? Then move on to blow up all the other planets we come across. Maybe now you can see why 8 generations later, until we stop eating the apples and learn self-governance, we will keep repeating this process and be stuck here. edit2: consider also this a possible solution to the Fermi Paradox. Those with the tech advanced enough have absolutely no desire to communicate with this unholy people. Anyone like-minded has destroyed themselves or is stuck in their star system. Also consider that anyone capable of traveling here has advanced past their material/matter based bodies a priori. They've been transfigured or born again. edit: audio quality is fine to me, but my system is likely upmixing the single right-channel audio track into surround sound by default. I'm not inclined to bother with it, but this references one comment below complaining of a right-channel audio only.

    • @krishnakarthik4752
      @krishnakarthik4752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might need some help

    • @paulsaulpaul
      @paulsaulpaul 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@krishnakarthik4752 I wrote that 10 months ago. Likewise, I shan't even bother calling you out for appealing to the stone, as I shan't be bothered to reread what I wrote 10 months ago. Henceforth, you will get a copy/paste of a response I wrote someone else on April 23, 2024 on a different video: It's a matter of opinion of what's truthful and honest. I think reductionists are offensive. People that speak of humans as "meat computers" lack the intellectual capacity to fathom the metaphysical. People that reduce intelligent design to random chance, breaking their own laws of physics with concepts that invoke negative entropy and self-emergent retrocausalities, are being fundamentally dishonest. At best, they're making as many assumptions as the "religious" types they decry. But worse, in my opinion, they have no foundational basis for their disorder tending toward order (negentropy) and just handwave it away as not important. These people claim that consciousness cannot be a product of the divine or exist within some higher metaphysics they don't understand. They call it a self-emergent byproduct of a "meat computer" with no foundational basis and no explanation for how that works. No model. These people don't even understand what matter is, yet they base their entire reality off of it. Not a single one of them has seen an atom, or an electron for that matter. They consider electrons to exist as probabilistic clouds. Their model is based on indeterminism. And even a basic understanding of quantum mechanics causes their entire model of the universe, as it relates to consciousness, evolution, life, etc., to start to break down. I look at Tom Stonier's work in his information universe theory. Then I look at Assembly Theory. Now I start to have a more functional basis for intelligent design influencing evolution and the beginnings for a working model that properly allows for negative entropy. Stonier never reconciled his work with the second law of thermodynamics, but I think this can be done by taking the expansion of the universe to be the conservation of entropy. The ordering of the universe, the assembly of information as a driving force of evolution, is an act of negative entropy. The expansion of the universe, the very edges of the universe where the entropy is the highest, is where the negative entropy caused by the assembly of life and consciousness is conserved. The entropy is displaced to the edges of the universe and we observe this as endless and accelerating expansion. Now I've at least reconconciled life and consciousness with the second law of thermodynamics. Have the atheists done that? Now we have an information-based description of evolution that reconciles the negative entropy we observe but cannot explain. See Tom Stonier's work and the unrelated Assembly Theory that describes biological evolution (relatively new research) as the assembly of information over time. But here's the rub -- there has to be a universal source of information. A source of universal causality. That is God, as we know it. Constantly spewing out information that is assembled into the universe we have and life as we know it (per Assembly Theory). Time and space as well as the observable physical matter and forces in nature arises from this. It also resolves the chicken-egg paradoxes, dualities, and retrocausality problems of every other theory of physics out there. But all of this requires God. A divine, intelligent source of creation. What do the reductionist atheists have to offer as an explanation? A random dice roll made all this you see around you? Even Albert Einstein thought that idea to be absurd. I consider atheists to be intellectually lazy. Just my opinion. This is why people like Jordan and myself consider Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, et al. to be fundamentally wrong. I find their views offensive to humanity.

  • @tiredironrepair
    @tiredironrepair ปีที่แล้ว

    Gravity is a misconception. It is buoyancy vs. density with "down" determined by electrical conduction between the ionosphere and the - ground. Space is also a poorly thought out attempt at coming up with a theory. I would love to know how the big bang inflationary expanding universe theory can explain the supposed acceleration of the PRESSURE wave being pushed outward at the event horizon with the notion of the same universe containing a vacuum. So the universe is being pushed outward into expansion by a vacuum within. Some globetrotter needs to explain.

  • @odenwalt
    @odenwalt ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course entropy is at the surface of the black hole. The surface is the only place where space can manifest kinetic energy. The energy below the surface is all potential. Entropy is locked up below the surface. This is why Black holes shrink over time. Potential energy has to become kinetic energy, and this can only happen at the surface.

  • @chadterry9770
    @chadterry9770 ปีที่แล้ว

    So annoying that audio is only left ch, not stereo o

    • @Les537
      @Les537 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have your headphones on backwards.hehe

  • @williamjmccartan8879
    @williamjmccartan8879 ปีที่แล้ว

    Neil is awesome in his explanation of his work and it is greatly appreciated. Thank you for sharing. Peace

  • @PCMcGee1
    @PCMcGee1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are people coughing and shuffling papers in the audience louder than the presenter?

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual ปีที่แล้ว

    there is the same amount of "momentum" forwards "backwards" or inverse or mirrored etc. so if you define time as movement of the wave function rather than entropy. this resolves time parity. there is the same amount of momentum regardless of configuration "forwards" and "backwards".

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d ปีที่แล้ว

    Vr = zero point and the apex of the Space vortex. Vl = zero point and the apex of the Counterspace vortex.

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d ปีที่แล้ว

    Zero point = Condensate of Universe. Scalable Aether Universe.

  • @briansiddon2255
    @briansiddon2255 ปีที่แล้ว

    i am thinking about time. if zero is infinity and one is dead stop, everything in between is a variable. the idea here is that time is conditional, local, universal and intradimensional. imagine time to exist where there is nothing and also everything. gravity then becomes an exponent of applied time in our universe. this idea allows for time to exist before and after; and inside and outside our universe. were I to divide zero and force its action of division into a klien bottle, we would geometrically arrive at our universe. if use time as a base line i could say that zero divided by any value of time equals a function of singularity, or 0/T=U for universe. Add the dimensional aspect of zero 'D' to prevent infinity and I get Dx0/T=U. during the function any division of zero would produce 2 dimensions of finite composition. so it becomes a value equation to arrive at the exact use of the function Dx0/T=U to get our universe as it is, slightly unbalanced, flat ( flat as time moving forwards) and stable.

    • @atticuswalker
      @atticuswalker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      gravity is time dialation. not cause and effect. 10 dimentions of mass based on density of wavelength. atomic number and position in fractorial. time dialates with density. that's why the sky is blue. and sunsets red.

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual ปีที่แล้ว

    here is a resolution to the paradox, hawking was apparently wrong. th-cam.com/video/tQYsb5QF2nU/w-d-xo.html <---- this is what shows hawkings mistake.

  • @msg72freenetde
    @msg72freenetde ปีที่แล้ว

    The sound quality makes this video useless

    • @msg72freenetde
      @msg72freenetde ปีที่แล้ว

      Video has right audio channel only

  • @dougg1075
    @dougg1075 ปีที่แล้ว

    My right ear thanks you.

  • @louKushh
    @louKushh ปีที่แล้ว

    brilliant.

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 ปีที่แล้ว

    The expanding electrons do it all. A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding makes a hydrogen atom. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. All EMR also. Start at start. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon. Done 20 years ago: try to keep up.

    • @mremtb7689
      @mremtb7689 ปีที่แล้ว

      A proton is a collection of expanding electrons? A proton is made of quarks.

    • @davidharvey3743
      @davidharvey3743 ปีที่แล้ว

      What are You talking about? " A proton is 1836 electrons" ?

    • @davidrandell2224
      @davidrandell2224 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidharvey3743 The electron mass is 9.11- multiplied by 1836 equals the proton mass- 1.67. Light is a cluster of expanding electrons. Expanding electrons/atoms do it all. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. All Standard Theory/Model replaced by Expansion Theory. No energy, charge, photons, waves, spin, fields, potential, quantum,quarks, space, time, space-time, etc. all fairy tales like epicycles unworthy of pursuing. Progress. Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object: gravity; d=1/2at^2 major part of the gravity equation. All atoms and atomic objects are expanding at 1/770,000th their size per second per second constant acceleration: multiplied by earth’s radius equals 16 feet; the distance an object “falls”. Etc. Read the referenced book.

    • @mremtb7689
      @mremtb7689 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidharvey3743 a proton is 1836 times the mass of an electron. But the way you have written it is implying that a proton is made of electrons.

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric137 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love Dr. Turok.

  • @timveseli
    @timveseli ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for posting these on TH-cam. It’s great.

  • @carriagereturned3974
    @carriagereturned3974 ปีที่แล้ว

    too long didnt watch! Does he explains how the heck "big boom" is impossible given last JWST data and actually it was obvious long before - you cant have "dark energy" (because of 1st Law of Thermodynamics - Energy cannot be created or destroyed), i.e. just say "we do not understand a sh1t, so it is dark science".

  • @ingoos
    @ingoos ปีที่แล้ว

    Empirical & unapologetic data succinctly referred to as #finetuning strongly suggests that, since it all had a beginning... and in that instant-faster than seeing the "i" the word-so called cosmological constants achieved values which are highly improbable to be simply accidental... the "hint" is deafening: intelligent & deliberate design. #Psalm19v1

    • @niblick616
      @niblick616 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m afraid that is wishful thinking with no valid and verified evidence to support it. The ramblings of Bronze age people do not count as evidence of anything!

  • @SNDN_LN
    @SNDN_LN ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you youtube for the recommendation 4 hours after upload

  • @lewisjones2825
    @lewisjones2825 ปีที่แล้ว

    cosmosses made simple--hooray

  • @sheph1145
    @sheph1145 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb, as always. ❤ Neil Turok

  • @davidkemp3154
    @davidkemp3154 ปีที่แล้ว

    Left channel audio not working.

    • @marzchart591
      @marzchart591 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything he says is right.

    • @mremtb7689
      @mremtb7689 ปีที่แล้ว

      Works for me ?

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual ปีที่แล้ว

    In the model that was published under the name “natural Philosophy” authored by helical, published by Newman springs publishing; The Big Bang arose as a result of one of four possible causal mechanisms, first casual mechanism is the weakness of gravity, the second is the merger of two singularities, the third is dissipation of energy resulting in the sudden expansion, Lastly size becomes to big. How would these models fit your early universe?

    • @atticuswalker
      @atticuswalker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how about heat fuel and oxygen go bang. how's that for simple. the first 7 atoms formed aswell as the last . there was friction before 8 came along. then carbon and the rest from the pressure on both sides. like we see naturally happen all the time. just bigger.

    • @helicalactual
      @helicalactual 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@atticuswalker can you try to clarify what you mean?

    • @atticuswalker
      @atticuswalker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@helicalactual th-cam.com/video/2cqTZcLmxFs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=uYn4JdBcRufQ_ghp I made

  • @helicalactual
    @helicalactual ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. turoks point about it gets simpler as it goes out. Therefore there can be no multi-verse is a correlation does not provide causation argument. In our cosmological model, there could be room for it to get simpler simpler and simpler before it reaches another universe and becomes more complicated and complex. Universe is don’t have to medially bump up against one another or interact with each other in anyway. there could be millions of universe’s worth of space between them as hilbert space is “infinite”. So not a strong argument.

    • @dollabz777
      @dollabz777 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are different interpretations of the term "multiverse", many of which don't necessarily require a single, spatially infinite model (eg. so called "many worlds" quantum models). But your point is valid. I think it simply points to the fact that infinite spatial cosmological models allow for infinite solutions. Perhaps then it's better to focus our attention on more "local" cosmological models that are more concerned with the properties of our own universe. I see a certain elegance in a local cosmological model based on what we know about the properties of light. If light does not experience time, then light could be thought of as a timeless framework or blueprint that matter then follows. The speed at which this plays out is what we observe as the speed of light. The elegance of this model is that it provides an explanation for the constant speed of light, and resolves apparent causation problems such as those encountered in Wheeler's galaxy thought experiment.

    • @warpeace8891
      @warpeace8891 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with "does not provide causation argument" for a multiverse. I found this to be a lazy reference by Neil akin to the priest just saying it so it is. I just wanted to add that there is no reason why there should be ANY noticing of other universes. Multiple universes may be mutually exclusive, I always assumed so, otherwise I am not sure why they would be "other" universes.

  • @SNDN_LN
    @SNDN_LN ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you youtube for the recommendation.

  • @zholud
    @zholud ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing slides!

  • @RSLT
    @RSLT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture!!!