Adapting Vintage Lenses: Why I Do It and You Should Too
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
- Sony Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/zAE2z
Canon FD - geni.us/gmwGZw
Nikon F - geni.us/21g8An
Fuji Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/bC9MNMN
Canon FD - geni.us/Eee1Ani
Nikon F - geni.us/lRW5aHf
Canon RF Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/hx571
Canon FD - geni.us/yhhavU
Nikon F - geni.us/Rngz2
Canon EF-M Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/gSAwPR5
Canon FD - geni.us/zNCer5
Nikon F - geni.us/UvQVjJ
Nikon Z Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/wPtfRu3
Canon FD - geni.us/oyIR
Nikon F - geni.us/mtfx65
L Mount Adapters:
M42 Screw Mount - geni.us/KFven
Canon FD - geni.us/jIAR5
Nikon F - geni.us/TUg8
GEAR I USED TO MAKE THIS VIDEO
[VIDEO GEAR]
A Camera - geni.us/fCo6 or howl.me/ckVm0lD1bLa
A Lens - geni.us/sKvSYgw or howl.me/ck41FnUiazg
B Camera (Table Top) - geni.us/FOSOn or howl.me/clacKmmiIpL
B Lens - geni.us/z0GG3y or howl.me/clacIJ2PzXk
On Camera monitor - geni.us/t7Fc or howl.me/clacMGXabwL
My off camera monitor - geni.us/AHOu or howl.me/clacNMVLO3E
The LUTS I used for this video - bit.ly/42Q58uQ
[AUDIO GEAR]
Microphone (in shot) - geni.us/SAQ4uk7 or geni.us/PgtBlmS
Boom Microphone (out of shot) - geni.us/Tj8RI or howl.me/claeFm6CC9K
Cheaper alternative to boom mic (sounds just as good) - geni.us/0rN8FO or howl.me/claeF96KLvM
XLR Audio Recorder - geni.us/yDUf or geni.us/PgtBlmS
USB Audio Interface - geni.us/ZdN1a or howl.me/claeyKnGHYn
Wireless Microphone (out of studio) - geni.us/FPC4s or geni.us/j4Wdr
Podcast/Voice Over Mic - geni.us/SAQ4uk7 or geni.us/PgtBlmS
In Shot Mic Arm - geni.us/J7Fp or howl.me/claeHeGSgTP
Editing Headphones - geni.us/WmwFC or howl.me/claeI1mcuEm
Editing Speakers (super cheap but awesome) - geni.us/wfLkz
Stand for Boom Mic and Overhead Camera - geni.us/8O8UtdY
[LIGHTING]
Main Light (Key Light) - geni.us/nQQ10
Main Softbox - geni.us/GysBN or howl.me/claeZmiRVXD
Light Stand (for Key/Main light) - geni.us/y4HuK4R
Hair Light - geni.us/waB7lTp or howl.me/clae0ZXBNf6
Background Light - geni.us/xFjA or howl.me/clae13MRGt4
Light Tubes (behind my monitor) - Small - geni.us/5Lvl Large - geni.us/4QPjp
[COMPUTER AND EDITING]
Monitor - geni.us/lLrTKSZ or howl.me/clae6ljgAjk
Computer - geni.us/rOHA or howl.me/clae7xrpHw1
Dock (one plug for power, audio, monitor, and 6 hard drives) - geni.us/lwJDmz
Keyboard - geni.us/bA16W or howl.me/clae8BToiuQ
Touchpad - geni.us/PLaLMh or howl.me/clae9zb8HB3
Editing Software I Use - www.apple.com/au/final-cut-pro/
Awesome Free Editing Software (Pros use it!) - www.blackmagicdesign.com/prod...
* Some links are affiliate links, you do not pay any extra, but I may get a small commissions. Using these links allows me to make more videos like this one.
00:00 - Why I Do it
01:27 - How It Works
4:23 - What Adapters to Get
9:24 - What Lenses to Get
10:47 - Finding a GOOD Lens (What to look out for)
12:50 - Camera Settings
14:47 - How to Nail Manual Focus
18:02 - Vintage Lenses vs Budget Chinese Lenses
21:35 - What’s Next? - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA GF D2 | Summer | ร่วมส่งแรงใจ เชียร์ไทยไปพร้อมกัน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dN2gLsCJ0T0/mqdefault.jpg)
great choice, I would also recommend Konica lenses, Porst, Minolta MD, Canon FD S.S.C.
Also Fungus is not a problem if you have the courage and right tools.
Yes, I love the Minolta MD too. Thanks for the tips, you know this stuff better than I do.
Definitely. The breech mount FD lenses are so easy to take apart and clean. You can get some seriously cheap lenses if youre willing to do some quick maintenance.
One thing to remember however, coatings on some lenses are very sensitive to whatever chemicals the fungus is pooping out. So it might have done permanent damage to the coating, sometimes even etch the glass itself. On the plus side however, do you even care if you've bought a legendary lens for 5 bucks?
@@alibarancelik8903 Those are the ones you keep for those misty portraits!🔥
@@Mobius1_ My keeper is the Minolta RF 250mm mirror I got for free because it had fungus in it. I opened it up and the fungus wasn't even touching the glass, just on the walls. Getting a 1500€ lens for free is pretty hard to beat.
Zenography is a great channel for learning about a whole bunch of vintage lenses!
He’s so freakin good, love his videos.
Absolutely right. 💯
His voice calms my nerves if I'm having a bad day
I have over 100 vintage lenses of many different makes. I shoot with both the Fujifilm XT-5 and the Canon R. For me, the easiest way to adapt the lens is to first adapt it to EF mount using a thin adapter. That reduces the number of mount-specific adapters, and it allows me to use the viltrox focal reducer on the XT-5 when I want to. BTW - The Viltrox focal reducer works great with vintage lenses. It doesn't seem to noticably impact the image quality. I recomend the adapter for people who want the "full frame look" in their images and effectively double the selection of focal lengths with any lens.
I think the best way for adapting all possible vintage lenses is to use Leika L mount, as intermediate mount... This way you just buy one adapter with leika L to your mirrorless body turning it into leika L body... And after you can buy almost any mount to leika L adapter and turn any mount lens into leika L lenst... What it will give you, is ability to use motorized afapters which are all done for leija L due to shortest flange dustance in the vintage lenses world, turning your manual lens into the slow autofocus lens... Also you will be able to use the best from vintage lenses world - leika L lenses, and also it is easy and cheaper to get vintage mounts to leika L mount adapters...😊😊
At 11:07, some other major issues to watch out for when shopping for vintage lenses are haze and balsam separation.
Usually, haze occurs when a lens’ lubricants, like that for the focusing helicoid, becomes vaporized at eventually sits on a lens element. Haze will lower contrast and sharpness. It can get worst over time, though it is usually serviceable.
Lens separation or balsam separation is when two elements, usually a doublet, separate as the glue is deteriorating. This will lower sharpness, contrast, produce aberrations, etc. Separation gets worst overtime and is nearly impossible to repair without expensive specialized equipment.
100% support this behavior. I have a small collection of FD lenses I am converting to EF and L. Great fun to find and great character filled looks to explore. My most expensive was a lens ($45) stuck on a broken camera...lens was like new and I was able to separate them easily. A good day in a thrift shop got a collection of lenses under $20.
Ive been researching some if tge Marylin Monroe shoots from a clothing perspective and this just added a whole new layer to my vintage clothing videos. Thank you for sharing
My favorite lenses in this category are the Asahi Takumars. My 200 has 18 aperture blades.
I fell in love with vintage lenses after finding a 1960 M42 135mm at a flea market and just going for it since the seller (who didn't know what he had) gave it to me for 10€, well under its value, especially since it was in great condition, glass was in mint condition, only the metal body was showing some wear... Been on the hunt for vintage gear ever since...
Got to say thanks for your recomendations on mount adapters. I foolishly bought cheap ones on ebay and was not satisfied, they fit but had some play when locked in, one of them would not even lock. Took your advice and bought the Pholsy brand, and they worked perfectly.
The Canon FL (pre-FD) lenses are great. The FL lenses use the same adapter and the FD lenses.
I have the 28, 35, 50, 85, 135 and 200
I have the FD28mm f2.8 as well. I keep looking for an FD24mm lens, but they are usually quite expensive. I'm guessing that's because of the video folks wanting them. One of my favorites is a Pentax-M 50mm f1.7. The vintage lenses are definitely fun to use. "f8 and be there!" Nice detailed overview of this topic.
Great presentation!
I've been watching your videos on budget lenses for a while and I have been heavily considering adapting vintage lenses, then boom you drop this video it's like you read my mind
I use a Canon EOS M50 camera, and have several vintage lenses from over the years. Have bought the corresponding adaptors and the results are great, nothing lost in the picture or video quality. A truly outstanding way to improve ones abilities and results.
Which lenses are your favourites?
If you get your hands on a vintage lens that takes a great picture, it's chef's kiss wonderful. None that I've ever used takes a clinically clear image, but that's not the point of them. They're almost always made using ground glass elements with (sometimes slightly radioactive) coatings that lend images certain characteristics you just can't get with modern lenses. They're also great to learn on since the lens does nothing for you, you get really familiar with your camera and things like focusing, ISO, aperture and shutter speed.
Very interesting and informative. Thank you
The Helios 44-2 was used on Dune 2 as well. I have been shooting with vantage for years other than when I need autofocus for a pro job. But that work is all cold and perfect. The vintage stuff has a look you can't add in post, and every lens is unique.
If you are looking for the Helios 44 lens older than 1978 (first two digits of the SN are the production year) give the best swirl. The 44 is the first of them and they are the oldest and in Silver and in M39 screw mount. The 44-2 was built the most (estimated 14 million made) these are M42 screw mount and probably the best to get the unique look. The 44-3 is newer and looks more like lenses from the 80s/90s and can fit weird on some cameras, it still swirls and has more glass coatings than the 44-2. The 44m is late 80s into the 90s so it is soviet and Russian made, good glass but almost no swirl. Lastly there is the 44m-4 and it is a good lens with no swirl and is like a 50mm from any camera manufacture in the 80s and 90s.
The 44-2 is awesome, I have 15 of them and they all shoot just a bit different. I shoot with one from the year I was born because I think it is fun. LoL
Oh they are easy to work on and you can flip the front glass to get even more bonkers swirl.
I have quite a few vintage lenses and plan to get more in the future and I can confirm it is glorious
I can't believe it, the exact video I was looking for. Great job on the preso. I hope you do more on vintage lenses.
More to come!
super suer informative .thaks for giving a hella good rundown
I think the best way for adapting all possible vintage lenses is to use Leika L mount, as intermediate mount... This way you just buy one adapter with leika L to your mirrorless body turning it into leika L body... And after you can buy almost any mount to leika L adapter and turn any mount lens into leika L lenst... What it will give you, is ability to use motorized afapters which are all done for leija L due to shortest flange dustance in the vintage lenses world, turning your manual lens into the slow autofocus lens... Also you will be able to use the best from vintage lenses world - leika L lenses, and also it is easy and cheaper to get vintage mounts to leika L mount adapters...😊😊
I always love watching your videos that highlight unique lenses or ways to achieve unique looks.
This video is so methodical in its instruction, you were answering my questions in the next step or two after I had them. This is so helpful for a beginner like me. Thank you! 🙂
Thanks!
MC/MD lenses are extremely cheap and work great! I have a minolta film camera and a micro 4/3 mirrorless so I picked up an adapter for $15 off amazon and have been loving shooting with the old lenses. If you have a national camera exchange or other camera store try to buy them in person. I got a 28mm f2.8 ($5), 35mm f2.8 ($10), 50mm f1.7 ($10), and 75-205mm f4 with 2x multiplier ($15) from their bargin table. Online the cheapest for any of them was $25 with shipping so if you can BUY IN STORE. No mold, mildew, or scratches, a little dust but it doesn't show at all, and for the price you cant beat it, love using them on my minolta srt101 and lumix g85.
Wonderful clear explanation of vintage lens. I sort of look at them as "burried treasure". I have a Panasonic G9ii and with a Pentax adapter I am able to use my Pentax Takumar 1.4. I understand a lot more about using vintage lenses and manual focus but I l love the idea that mirrorless cameras can use these iconic lenses. It's the utlimate of recycling.
WHOAH! The Matrix is real- I swear to god i just ordered an adaptor for a couple of pentax smc lenses (the 50mm and 28mm) for my sony apsc last night! Was it my own idea OR WAS TH-cam CONTROLLING ME? I've already plunged into the wormhole of chinese lenses (just picked up a SIRUI 24mm Nightwalker- I'm in love!), but the possibilities opened up by mounting vintage lenses will most likely CONSUME MY LIFE. I blame you, Mark😂😭
I love my old k mount lenses! I was surprised to see no mention of the massively prolific k mount, which is still fully backwards compatible to this very day. I can use an unadapted 50 year-old k mount lens on my k-3, and quickly adapt it to my 7D with no added glass.
I bought a Sony a 300 so I could use my Minolta a lenses just for B&W photography. Also bought an adapter for my Zfc for them and another for my Zeiss 45 mm. They work great, glad to see you are better.
Great video Mark. One very important thing you forgot to mention, many vintage lenses are Radioactive ☢️☢️ with Thorium glass! There are lists online where you can look them up, but sometimes there is variation even within a certain model. If you see a vintage lens with a golden warm hue its probably radioactive. The super-takumar fast 50s are a big one people buy that are usually radioactive. Do not hold a vintage lens up to your eye, do not ever break one inside your house, and especially do not eat the radioactive glass! I have also seen varying reports on how dangerous (or not) radioactive vintage lenses are but that is up to each person to decide if its worth the risk. But i just wanted to mention this as i had no idea when i first started buying vintage glass.
Man, I have no idea what I’m going to have for breakfast now, if radioactive glass is off the table. ;-) good info, thanks for sharing.
@@ChasWG The point I was trying to make is that radioactivity is a legitimate issue with older lenses and people should be aware of it so they can do their own research to assess what risk it may pose. If you leave a hot lens mounted to your digital camera for a long time it's possible it could damage your sensor as well.
@@markwiemelsI mean you would think that you wouldn't have to mention not to eat radioactive glass but some people might think it's a cheap way to get super-powers
So this has been pretty been debunked as not harmful to humans. I'm sure your cell phone in your pocket emits more... Which isn't harmful either. The yellow haze can be fixed by just using lens or setting in sunlight for a little bit.
I am one of the people on the fence about these. I got an adapter by ordering the wrong thing so I've been looking up the idea of this. I think you covered all of the questions I had. Thank you.
Also you can look for Quarry Master lenses, they have great specs, and Exceptional sharpness for a vintage lens, plus lens coating looks very good
Excellent video! I'm a beginner photographer and just bought a Nikon D3500 and have some vintage lenses. This was very helpful.
A thorough explanation of adapting vintage lenses to modern mirrorless cameras. Years ago before I even had a mirrorless camera, a high quality Japanese Photo magazine ‘Old Lens Life’ opened my eyes to using vintage lenses with adapters. In Japanese but lots of great example Lens photos and list of adapters available illustrating the possibilities. No, Vintage lenses are generally not modern optical quality (sharpness at wide apertures, sharpness across the frame and not just the center, very high contrast), but have that ‘look’ and character for unique quality. Filling out a lens system at low cost is another advantage and as you’ve pointed out rather fun too find. Just to minimize my cost with adapters I’ve settled on vintage M42 and M-series L39/LTM lenses [I already have]. As for the M42 lenses, I have found an advantage with the older 1950s lenses with the 2-ring Pre-set lenses design, able to set a minimum stopped down aperture with the one ring, and then a smooth adjustment and viewing the focus/bokeh with the other ring (and can add another creative element with video use).One thing with vintage L39/M-series lenses not covered here, is about the modern camera sensor ‘cover-glass.’ Many (most?) modern mirrorless camera have a thick sensor cover glass. This can have an effect on image quality for some L39/M-series wide-angle lenses that have their rear glass closer to the film/sensor than a vintage SLR lens; lessen sharpness and even ‘smearing’ effect in the outer frame area. The one mirrorless camera that I know addressed this is the Leica SL series with a very thin designed sensor cover glass.
Awesome advice...I bought a Nikkor 35-70 f2.8 push/pull zoom (late 80's vintage) for an old film camera I have. When I finally realized the lens worked on my D810 I was pleasantly surprised considering the lens being 30 years older than the camera. The lens might be heavy and awkward, but the photos it produces are beautiful. Didn't even have to use any adapters and the autofocus works like a charm (autofocus motor is in the body).
So much work, investment & time for this video, much appreciated & bookmarked. Becoming not just best lens channel but best camera channel. Thanks again ❤
Very kind, I appreciate the support.
This is a great topic and video. Thanks! I have a few Nikon vintage and a SMC Takumar. I would like to get more but struggle with finding the best sources. Another great TH-cam channel to check out for vintage lenses is Simon’s Utak. More videos like this one please - great work.
Great content! I have two vintage Canon fl and fd mount lenses I use on my Sony a7iii.
Thanks Mark - love your comments about the "thrill of the chase". After binging on your channel last year, I decided to get back into photography by buying a second-hand M50 kit. Took a while to find the right bargain for me - but so much fun!
Great to hear!
Mark, Love all of your videos. I have an M50 and I have a Pentax 28 & 50mm lenses that I forgot I had. I have the adapter and I love the photos that they produce. Thanks again.
Haha! Exact same here! Love the Pentax 28 on the M50. I found both the 28 and 50 that I had stored away from my film days got an adapter and WHOA!
Excellent
For the M42 mount I'd recommend getting the cheaper adaptors like M42 to EF or M42 to nikkor for each lens and then getting a single adaptor from EF/NIKKOR to the mirrorless mount.. That way the M42 lenses don't need to be screwed in/out all the time making it faster to change lenses!
Agreed. It's not that much overhead
Vintage glass is the ABSOLUTE BEST! I can't see myself spending what could very well be the equivalent of a mortgage payment to get the same look or better from a vintage lens that cost me the price equivalent of a couple of chili dogs or a nice dinner.
I went through 5 copies of the 44-2 to find the one. You'd think the quality control of the Soviet era would be tight but it wasn't apparently. All 5 were 70's kmz. Finally found one that was sharp in the middle wide open. It is my favorite vintage lens to use and it's also the cheapest i have.
Been loving the vintage lenses I've been getting. I recently have been building a set of Nikon Nikkor non-AI and AI lens. I have a 24mm f2.8, 35mm, f2.8, and now a 50mm f2. The 35mm and 24mm were real beat up when I got them, so I got cheap deals on them and the 35mm has been one of my faves for like 8 months now. The 50mm I had to clean fungus out of. As I convert all my lens to ef via adapters for both my Sony a6400 and Canon dslr, I've found Nikon F mount and m42 mount lenses the most useful to me. The Olympus OM mount also is pretty easy to adapt to ef. I really don't like using FD mount because it requires an additional glass element in the adapter to ef. The Canon FDs are beautiful lenses but tragically that extra glass in the adapter softens the image and crops the image a bit more too. For Sony, the FDs work great but for ef mount adpating, it gets messy unless you want to spend big bucks to convert the lens's mount from fd to ef on the actual lens itself. I also have a Helios 44-2 and a super takumar 135mm f3.5 like your two which I enjoy both, but I shoot apsc Sony and Canon cameras so both of those lenses are rather long for equivalent focal lengths.
I share your sentiment about the FD lenses; I have a few lenses for my A-1 which I had hoped to use on my EF gear but found out that not only does the adapter add glass which changes the character of the lens, it’s impossible to shoot at any aperture other than wide open because I get a hazy ring in the center of my frame!
I know there’s an endless number of modern digital cameras, each with their own settings, but my Nikon D3400 and my Canon Rebel T7 both shoot fine with vintage lenses that have no electronic contacts by just shooting manual mode instead of using any auto settings. There’s no need to go into the menus. Perhaps higher end cameras are different but for hobbyist level cameras in Canon and Nikon it should be easier to switch your dial to M instead of searching the menu for a maintenance setting.
Thanks Mark, after your video tested a Formula 5 200mm f/3.5 mount M42 vintage lens on Lumix S5ii in low-light. Be surprise about the picture came out. See differ with the original 200mm Panasonic Lumix f/4.0
In my opinion you can't go wrong with Olympus OM lenses too, they are exellent in quality and are quite sharp, even with crop sensors. Only downside is, that the OM range of lenses isn't that big and some lenses can get quite expensive, but I think the quality and uniqueness makes up for that! Great video, thanks!
Shhhhhhh......
I shoot M 4/3 (Olympus) and you can adapt just about anything. I have several M39 screw mount lenses and a gaggle of M42. PK IS A NICE MOUNT, BUT YOUR CHOICE OF LENSES IS SMALL.A favorite is the Yashinon DX 50mm 1.7. It’s a tank,but it renders colors well. It’s manual, but with a bit of practice you can nail focus quickly. Focus peaking is your friend.
Great video Mark! Another channel I find invaluable is Simon’s Utak. His focus (no pun…) is M42 mount lenses.
Thanks, I'll check him out.
Best camera to use with vintage lenses: Zf, because of the subject detection with manual lenses. Believe me, a game changer
The Brightin Star is currently my favorite lens. And it almost fills a full frame
Love your channel, your love for vintage lens was one of the big reasons that I had started giving them a chance, and now I have like 10 or so of these lenses... (Helios 44, SMC 35, 50, Jupiter 9 85mm, Zuiko 50 Macro and 135 are some of my favorite picks). I have a question though, as I am in the process of retiring my 4 year old m50. Would there be a lot of issues with adapting these lenses to a7c and are there anything to look out for? I've been thinking of getting into full frame, and the a7c is my first choice given its size, price and weight.
All great points. Also, here is what I do when adapting vintage lens to my Canon M mount. I buy the EF adapter for the designated lens. Then use the EF to M adapter which gives me the option of using the speed booster if desired. Also, if shooting on a micro 4/3 system, I only need one EF to MFT adapter for my entire vintage lens collection.
i do very simiar, though ive noticed some m42 screw mount lenses have the rear optical element protrude out of the back at a certain focusing distance. this results in it hitting the glass of the speedbooster and not having full range of focus. in this case, i just use a regular adapter to eos m
Fair point. I have also had issues with L39 to EF adapters as the focusing gets thrown off. So, I will need to do more research on this.
First of all, I am sorry to hear about your illness. Best of luck to you! One thing I need to know is how does adapting a 35mm lens affect the fielf of view on my APS-C camera. If I want to buy a 35mm Nikon lens, will that give me a 35mm field of view on APS-C or will I see less than a 35mm FOV? That same question applies to using a 35mm tele lens on APS-C. I hope that you can clarify those questions for me.
Hi! Some of old lenses are M39! They can be good too.
More adapter options include helicoid (gets you closer to your subject) and tilt-shift (for full frame lenses on crop sensor cameras). If you want to use a tilt-shift adapter on a full frame camera, you'll have to use a medium or large format lens.
I mounted a Pentax 67 lenses to my Sony body and it was a pain to use but I got some reaaaally interesting photos with it.
First. Been adapting since 2010 when I had my Canon rebel Xsi
Great video.
What’s about Leica vintage lenses? Is that not a good idea to adapt one of these to an aps-c camera?
In Vintage lenses, 35mm is more rare than 28mm. I have about 17 28mm lenses (ok I collect them) but I have 2 or 3 35mm vintage lenses because they are so rare, especially any f2 or faster. In film days the 28mm was THEE 35. And personally, I love shooting a 28mm. I even have that massive Sigma 28mm f1.4 ART because I find that focal length to just be so good.
I’ve needed a vintage 35 for a long time lol it was an uncommon length, for certain, but it fills a really important gap in my primes and would be so ideal for street photography
I have the 58mm Helios, a 50mm 1.4, a 28mm 3.5, a 135mm 2.8, and a 300mm 4.5, all vintage Nikkors. I want the 85mm 1.8, and the 105, 2.5 as well. It's a good collection to have.
There is a guy on ebay that has so many adapters. Just ordered a M33 to sony E mount for this $10 lens i picked up that went on argus brick. Not sure if it will be fun or not, but cant wait to find out.
I still have my Olympus SLRs and lenses, perhaps an adaptor would be a great way to bring them back into use and give them the love they deserve?
M42 and Nikon lenses can also be used on canon eos They are amazing for video Pentax K also Have too many my wife says 😂
Thanks!
Surprised you suggested Leica screw mount over M mount. I won a Voigtlander 15mm screw mount lens that came with a M mount adapter, wich are thin, so the seller didn't realize it wasn't native M mount lens. Saw a few of those online for a similar price to the 3rd party adapers for M mount lenses. This way one gets best of both.
I have 3manual lenses adapted to my Sigma FPL. Only one that’s vintage is a Minolta 58mm f1.2. Love it! My advice for anyone who likes to often change lenses during a shoot, buy adapters for each lens and keep them on the lenses. That way all your lenses have the same back caps.
I wonder what people with over 30 vintage lenses would do? Follow your advice and get an adapter for each?
@@cosmashono7665 maybe just have enough adapters so that all the lenses in your camera bag are covered.
Also, take your APS-C game to rhe next level by instead getting an EF mount adapter for your vintage lenses, and a focal reducer for EF to your mirrorless mount of choice.
Full frame lenses, APS-C sensor goodness.
I have the viltrox EF-FX2 and use it mostly with vintage glass and it's fantastic.
Fascinating video, going to have to dip my toes in the water.. the Helios 44-2 lens. Are they different focal lengths or are they all 58mm ?
44-2 means it's a 58mm, odd I know, there are other Helios lenses, with diffrent focal lengths they are all worth looking at if they a cheap.
There is also the Helios 40 which is 85mm f1.5 about 5X more money than 44-2
My choice, Olympus OM Zuiko. I now have about 20 lenses, some I already own since the seventies, and use them on a Sony A7(s) mark 1. Note, for focusing the magnifier works great. But do not trust the “focus peaking”, it’s very inaccurate.
What about crop sensor bodies? There are adaptors that step up the focal length and makes the f stop faster by having a lens in the adapter. Do you recommend these adapters?
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
I have about 20 vintage lenses...fun, unique, etc. I’d say if you’re looking wide go the Chinese route... wides are so much better & wider now & less expensive than just a few available wide vintage lenses. Not the same look, sharper, contrasty... but fits the bill!
Hi Mark.
What adaptor for Olympus OM to Fuji FX?
beware of the fungous. since you are usually store lenses together it might be contagious
If you don't have a mirrorless and have EOS you can mount NK, OM, M42 (probably not infinity though..), All Adaptall II NK or OM with cheap EOS adapter...
EOS adapters for PK are also good, without any adapting lenses . M42 mounts also work fine to infinity.
I use m42 to k on my K-iii and as the k to EOS adapter when using my 40D and 70D APS-C cameras.
Honestly, I have a cracked xf 70-300 and it still creates beautiful photos. Really only seems cosmetic if not for the bokeh balls having a "bite" taken out of it. So not really scared of small scratches or some light cleaning marks anymore. lol
i wonder if i can use teh strange lens i got on my Zorki 1 on a lumix gx80
Agree about M42, and to extent M39 - the easiest lens systems to adapt.
Agree about Nikkors.
Disagree about Canon FD system - your 3 lenses are relatively easy to adapt and handle, but older ones with bridge-lock bayonet are atrocious.
And in this video I didn't herd a word about Pentax K / M, Olympus OM, Minolta MD / MC or Contax - Yashica C / Y bayonet lenses - all of them
easily adaptable and easy to handle, often with exceptional IQ, also quite cheap, all do not in such great numbers as Nikkors or M42...
the new Brightin Star manual focus lens with F0.95 are best bang for buck going now
Yeh, it’s beauty.
not vintage, but amazing
I got an old Pentax lens from a charity shop for £5 and some of the images I've taken with it I liked better than those of the same subject in the same light taken with a £2000 lens at the same settings
You forgot to mention some of the cheap fd mount converters will not allow any apatire ajustment on lense therefore its stuck wide open. The adapter to over come this are £60 plus
I'm pretty sure as long as it has a ring that allows you to lock it in, it will work. I have one from fotasy That's perfectly fine with my 24 mm 2.8.
so which lense was used for the batman movie? 🤔
Helios 44-2
Can a cheap M42 Adapter ring trash my Ursa12k PL-Mount Cam? im trying to use a 44-2 on my Blackmagic cam and the metal adapterring i got was 19$
I wouldn’t have thought so. As long as you don’t feel like you are forcing anything on.
what's the name of the first lens in the video
What? No Minolta SR? You'll get my 135mm f/2.8 from me when, etc. 😊
Fungus can be removed quite easily with 20 to 30 dollars of tools and some hydrogen peroxide. As they are manual lenses, it's quite easy to take them apart. I'm not good at manual stuff but I easily cleaned a 55mm auto chinon and a helios 44-2.
I took apart some cheap FD mount 28mm 2.8 and I feel like summoning Maharoga. There's more pieces than I expected.
its funny i have two f mont film camera and i bought a f to e adaptor but i never use it becasue it just add too much length and the balance is worse off than if i use the 40mm f5,6 from the chinese manufacturer
A secret advice,
buy the macro lenses they are the sharpest......
I have two vintage lenses from 1958. They mostly work well but when they don't i put on my glasses.
When I take off my glasses my whole world is creamy bokeh.
0:30 that lens costs about $15..$20 here in Russia
If you're really into vintage lenses, invest in a 3D printer and you'll save a Ton of money on adapters.
Hi Sir,
I am from India, and using a Canon M50 nowadays.
I have wintage film cameras Olympus OM 10 with Sigma 35-70 & 70- 200 lenses.
Please suggest a suitable camera mount to use these lenses for still photography.
If you want your images to stand out of the rest of the images out there? Go seek out a vintage lens!
Helios 44 are trash 1 in 3 are sharp wide open.
Sounds like you've been very unlucky! How many have you tried?
I've bought and sold all sorts of Helios 44 variants over the last decade and haven't found a dud yet.
That Pentax on the thumb nail brings me
Back to high school