The original word best fitted, (by function), to the detailed content in this discussion, was "Omnipresence of Eternity-now", because the ground state is the least size and change, .ds/.dt aspect in zero-point/adibatic reference frame of spacetime functions assumed for all coordinates. It's an "un-natural" act to differentiate the history of a measured/calculated point of relative position-history by indiscriminate identification, but that is the process of science-math in practice, to rearrange the perceived reality by effective and affective mechanism. Recovering the observable, established universal properties, (by converting metaphysics to quantum chemistry), from the mish-mash of social histories, intact, is risky business career-wise. Or, is it yet possible to say that gravity is simply an aspect of the solid, liquid and gas or plasma states of entanglement? (In principle, it's the Quantum Chemistry of Superposition)
+eric taylor don't say that, Plochinski is a very good physicist, and the best Professor , he patiently answer all the questions, and do care about students!
Falling observer has finite time? Can u clear this doubt?
Was that last question asked by Maldacena?
R.I.P. Joe Polchinski.
The original word best fitted, (by function), to the detailed content in this discussion, was "Omnipresence of Eternity-now", because the ground state is the least size and change, .ds/.dt aspect in zero-point/adibatic reference frame of spacetime functions assumed for all coordinates. It's an "un-natural" act to differentiate the history of a measured/calculated point of relative position-history by indiscriminate identification, but that is the process of science-math in practice, to rearrange the perceived reality by effective and affective mechanism.
Recovering the observable, established universal properties, (by converting metaphysics to quantum chemistry), from the mish-mash of social histories, intact, is risky business career-wise.
Or, is it yet possible to say that gravity is simply an aspect of the solid, liquid and gas or plasma states of entanglement? (In principle, it's the Quantum Chemistry of Superposition)
sean hartnoll brought me here
impossible to listen to. just UH UH UH UH UH UH. Good subject, I couldn't bare to listen sorry.
+eric taylor don't say that, Plochinski is a very good physicist, and the best Professor , he patiently answer all the questions, and do care about students!
If you listen at 1.5x, none of that matters