Since there are no coincidences nor random actions nor are there disembodied spirits of the dead reaching out to us, then the only alternative left is that the vision of the father in the river was God wrought, whether a real visual experience or mental illusion is superfluous.
That which one might term as "philistine-ish" in ones cultural appreciation, others may perceive as the rejection of the pagan and anti-Christian. If one were to err, is it not better for the sake of ones soul to err on the side of the "philistine-ish"? And does this not relate back to Paul's cautioning statements regarding the weaker brother.
H A P P Y N E W Y E A R ! May God look upon our nation with His holy mercy and bring forth a third Great Awakening that washes away all the foulness that secularism and statism have wrought upon society and every image bearer.
I think Chris effectively highlighted to intrinsic flaw of the contemporary presentations in popular culture and entertainment. God's truth infuses nature, which makes the falicious assertions of the contemporary inferentially abhorrent and repulsive, which translates into choices of entertainment and the clear rejections of the woke.
Thanks for your work brothers
I stand corrected. I thought it was Monday but Chris just informed us that it's actually "Glennsday".
Seeing Glen's family in the background was heartwarming. Thank you for allowing this inclusion.
I believe Simon & Garfunkel originally were going to use Mickey Mantle''s name, but the Joe Dimaggio syllable count worked better.
Also would like to compliment Tom's wife for the very homey decor.
Since there are no coincidences nor random actions nor are there disembodied spirits of the dead reaching out to us, then the only alternative left is that the vision of the father in the river was God wrought, whether a real visual experience or mental illusion is superfluous.
Yes! Science cannot answer why. In fact it cannot even define science, that is up to the philosophers.
Pastor Wiley why are laughing at someones demise?
That which one might term as "philistine-ish" in ones cultural appreciation, others may perceive as the rejection of the pagan and anti-Christian. If one were to err, is it not better for the sake of ones soul to err on the side of the "philistine-ish"? And does this not relate back to Paul's cautioning statements regarding the weaker brother.
H A P P Y N E W Y E A R !
May God look upon our nation with His holy mercy and bring forth a third Great Awakening that washes away all the foulness that secularism and statism have wrought upon society and every image bearer.
I think Chris effectively highlighted to intrinsic flaw of the contemporary presentations in popular culture and entertainment. God's truth infuses nature, which makes the falicious assertions of the contemporary inferentially abhorrent and repulsive, which translates into choices of entertainment and the clear rejections of the woke.
So…with all this Tolkien love…when’s Chris gonna swim the Tiber?