The host is biased! UK 🇬🇧 media’s have all been biased because their country is infested with Islamist terrorist 😂😂😂Everthing is war propaganda after failing to defeat the IDF😂😂😂
💯 and they have been sending food aid in but Hamas steals it from the people and they are violent to their own gazan people too. They’re a buncha violent young brainwashed mercenaries their people literally hate them the gazan people want hamas gone trust me bro just trust me
Btw, in a more serious note, politicians do politics, and it’s not politically correct to call yourself antisemite. It is politically correct to use the other terms i mentioned, regardless if they’re based in facts or reality
Sharing "YOUR THOUGHTS" on this development. Like it's just a random person's thoughts..not an expert in international law. But yes, what else would you expect from the deputy political editor for BBC News.
Beautiful serene unflappability, as ever from Ms Hausdorff. As she says, these fools actually care nothing for international justice if they can abuse the law and this struggling institution in this manner.
The guy that interviewed Natasha ALWAYS seemed to cut Natasha short at the middle or end of each sentence when she made valid legal points supported Israel including when pointing towards Hamas. It was very clear to me…. It was wrong
Ownership Of Country,In Dispute,Thorn To Each Other,Unlawful Intrusion,Slaughter Of Unsuspecting Civilian,Not A Recognised Army,Self Appointed And Unauthorised, Claiming To Be Freedom Fighters,Financed To Do Battle By Other Countries Secretly.How Is All This Unlawful Actives Ignored.The President Is Lawfully Defending His Country And Citizens,If Not Him,Then Who?.
Why hasn't even one in a dozen arab, african, or asian despots of this century ended up in the ICC? same reason as why there haven't been any mass protest movements around the world against wars and how they're affecting the general populace of any number of islamic and african hell holes. It's simple as no Jews, no news. As a british Atheist it's making me so angry with my government and our media at their rank hypocrisy and their blatant antisemitism, all while they can't help themselves with the pandering to islamism every step of the way.
Pretty clear, John Pienaar, where your sensibilities lie. You weren't really interested in hearing the case being put forward by Natasha Hausdorff, in the same way that the ICC isn't interested in a balanced and fair view of Hamas's atrocities within Israel and Israel's right to defend itself from terroristic aggression, especially since the leaders of that organisation still hold more than a hundred alive and dead Jewish hostages. Shame on you while you try to tease out of Natasha a claim the the British government is anti-semitic. Well, we know, without a shadow of doubt that the Labour party is anti-semitic and Keir Starmer supported Corbyn through that shameful episode in British life.
To all those who are criticising the interviewer: This is just the way our UK journalists and interviewers are. I think we’re very different to other countries. Our main broadcasters are held to impartiality standards and shouldn’t take sides. Most journalists do their best to comply and this results in them playing devil’s advocate. They ask questions which they hope gives voice to the opposite view. This means the listener effectively gets to hear both sides. This interview is typical of what we get every day and I’m sure most people in this country don’t even raise an eyebrow to this style. I’ll just finish by saying that Natasha is an absolute diamond and as an Englishman I’m so proud that she’s standing up for Israel.
What a wanker of an interviewer. Just lob unsubstantiated canards, get an answer, then quickly move on to the next canard without an ounce of curiosity. The interviewer appears to just be looking for validation of his beliefs and hiding behind the court.
How sick a joke is this? The irony is that even before considering the details of the current conflict, the results and impact of Israel’s actions in Gaza and Lebanon against the evil that is represented by Hamas and Hezbollah has made the region safer, more stable, and potentially, a base for economic growth which will benefit many people in a number of states in the region. Consequently, far from Netanyahu being labelled a criminal, he should be praised and lauded as a harbinger of peace and nominated for the Nobel Peace prize.😅
That's what you get when you start international institutions who do not have any base in the rule of law. Whoever heads that court can make up his own rules.
Wow. Interviewer stopped Natasha right in the middle of her making a very valid statement. It was obvious, throughout this interview, that there was intent to try to lead Natasha into saying something that would support the interviewer's biased agenda, and when she proved to intelligent to fall into the trap, he abruptly ends it. Wow
Don’t trust this interviewer and the ones he represents. In fact, he should be shunned and ostracized, because he believes he’s a “gatekeeper” of information distribution and that should be only for interviewers who are completely objective, and he is clearly not objective. I feel sorry for this interviewer and his inability to think objectively and only cares about clicks. He’s pathetically corrupt and twisted
Always upvote Natasha Hausdorff
Well spoken Natasha.
Typical English trapping: ask flagrant questions and cut off the answer when not supporting the view of the interviewer!
Stay positive and focused Natasha… always a pleasure to hear you in action..👏🏻
❤ 2 Natasha Hausdorff.
Disband this travesty of a court.
The voice of reason and sanity: Natasha Hausdorff
notice when she move on to propaganda wars he call an end to the interview, he had no reply to that
The host is biased! UK 🇬🇧 media’s have all been biased because their country is infested with Islamist terrorist 😂😂😂Everthing is war propaganda after failing to defeat the IDF😂😂😂
They are bound by time restraints. I am glad they asked her on.
She isn’t sharing her thoughts, she’s sharing the facts. He should have been a lot more respectful to her.
He asked good questions, and she answered well.
The warrent for Netanyahu is political not legal.
Spot on 💯
I hope Natasha has a spacial episode for this so that she can finish what she intended to say
Ever capable, Natasha Hausdorff once again argues for true justice.
First ayatola and his proxies. Isreal did nothing wrong but protect their people
💯 and they have been sending food aid in but Hamas steals it from the people and they are violent to their own gazan people too. They’re a buncha violent young brainwashed mercenaries their people literally hate them the gazan people want hamas gone trust me bro just trust me
Natasha is so clear and brilliant. Why is it so hard to admit that world leaders may be antisemitic????
Btw, in a more serious note, politicians do politics, and it’s not politically correct to call yourself antisemite. It is politically correct to use the other terms i mentioned, regardless if they’re based in facts or reality
It's a joke. Nothing will come if it.
It will embolden those that already have heavy bias against BIBI and Israel.
Thank you, Natasha ❤
It's a shame that the interviewer doesn't know enough about the law to ask decent questions
Natasha is moral... and awesome.
The ICC has lost the plot.
Tehranical.
As they say, no jews no news . . .
ICC - International Court of Crooks.
International Criminal Censorship.
Wow! You should really let the smart woman talk and not interrupt her with stupid questions.
Sharing "YOUR THOUGHTS" on this development. Like it's just a random person's thoughts..not an expert in international law. But yes, what else would you expect from the deputy political editor for BBC News.
Beautiful serene unflappability, as ever from Ms Hausdorff. As she says, these fools actually care nothing for international justice if they can abuse the law and this struggling institution in this manner.
The guy that interviewed Natasha ALWAYS seemed to cut Natasha short at the middle or end of each sentence when she made valid legal points supported Israel including when pointing towards Hamas. It was very clear to me…. It was wrong
I've been waiting for her legal take on this all day. I read the law the bestI could, but now it's time for a professional opinion.
Shame on Times Radio for abrupting every time
John Pienaar (ex BBC) if nothing else has ambivalent views
I'm glad I heard this and Natasha's previous advises
ICC = incompetent Cangaroo Court
ICC = Intellectually Corrupt Cabal.
Why is the ICC not issuing warrants for the Iranian leadership?
The simple answer is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Passing.
Ownership Of Country,In Dispute,Thorn To Each Other,Unlawful Intrusion,Slaughter Of Unsuspecting Civilian,Not A Recognised Army,Self Appointed And Unauthorised, Claiming To Be Freedom Fighters,Financed To Do Battle By Other Countries Secretly.How Is All This Unlawful Actives Ignored.The President Is Lawfully Defending His Country And Citizens,If Not Him,Then Who?.
Why didn't Blair or Bush end up there? Must only count when a country defends itself it seems!
Well the US has the Invade the Hague act so the UN won't do shit against America.
Why hasn't even one in a dozen arab, african, or asian despots of this century ended up in the ICC? same reason as why there haven't been any mass protest movements around the world against wars and how they're affecting the general populace of any number of islamic and african hell holes. It's simple as no Jews, no news. As a british Atheist it's making me so angry with my government and our media at their rank hypocrisy and their blatant antisemitism, all while they can't help themselves with the pandering to islamism every step of the way.
What an astonishing predicament. How on earth did humanity arrive at this juncture. Thank you Natasha, very clearly explained.
Much love to Natasha! 🤍
It's a shame you cut her off she was making an extremely valid answer to your question.
Say, muslim judge, you said it all.
Pretty clear, John Pienaar, where your sensibilities lie. You weren't really interested in hearing the case being put forward by Natasha Hausdorff, in the same way that the ICC isn't interested in a balanced and fair view of Hamas's atrocities within Israel and Israel's right to defend itself from terroristic aggression, especially since the leaders of that organisation still hold more than a hundred alive and dead Jewish hostages. Shame on you while you try to tease out of Natasha a claim the the British government is anti-semitic. Well, we know, without a shadow of doubt that the Labour party is anti-semitic and Keir Starmer supported Corbyn through that shameful episode in British life.
The problem is that the legalities always reflect the politics of the dominant power of the time.
China
October 7th backfired and its perpetrators could never have imagined how much it has.
May this political terrorism by the ICC backfire equally
To all those who are criticising the interviewer: This is just the way our UK journalists and interviewers are. I think we’re very different to other countries. Our main broadcasters are held to impartiality standards and shouldn’t take sides. Most journalists do their best to comply and this results in them playing devil’s advocate. They ask questions which they hope gives voice to the opposite view. This means the listener effectively gets to hear both sides.
This interview is typical of what we get every day and I’m sure most people in this country don’t even raise an eyebrow to this style.
I’ll just finish by saying that Natasha is an absolute diamond and as an Englishman I’m so proud that she’s standing up for Israel.
Hence my inability to listen to or watch the BBC, ITV or Channel 4 news for years.
Lovely 🥰 way to end the conversation 😂😂😂😂 do not be rude Mr.
🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽❤️❤️❤️🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
Thank you Natasha Hausdorff
"Dangerous joke!" the US are ABSOLUTELY right about Den Haag's victim nonsense. Arab responsibility?
I love hearing such a clear and intelligent voice of reason.
What a wanker of an interviewer. Just lob unsubstantiated canards, get an answer, then quickly move on to the next canard without an ounce of curiosity. The interviewer appears to just be looking for validation of his beliefs and hiding behind the court.
thought exactly the same myself.....hate interviewers like that......
How sick a joke is this? The irony is that even before considering the details of the current conflict, the results and impact of Israel’s actions in Gaza and Lebanon against the evil that is represented by Hamas and Hezbollah has made the region safer, more stable, and potentially, a base for economic growth which will benefit many people in a number of states in the region. Consequently, far from Netanyahu being labelled a criminal, he should be praised and lauded as a harbinger of peace and nominated for the Nobel Peace prize.😅
VERY DISRESPECTFUL INTERVIEWER!!!
Dont ask your guest a question if you aren't prepared to give her time to answer
The USA and its allies must create their own international court of justice.
She is spot on!
That's what you get when you start international institutions who do not have any base in the rule of law. Whoever heads that court can make up his own rules.
This interviewer is clearly not a journalist but an activist interested only in pushing an agenda.
Who is going to investigate the allegations of a sexual nature made against Karim Khan?
and gets cut off because the guy with the agenda doesn't want the facts
Thanks.
I studied law too, and I agree (anyone who has studied law will agree as well)
DO NOT ARGUE, DO NOT SAY ANYTHING
Let your lawyers talk in your stead.
Boycott and shut down the ICC!
I love this woman, nuff said.
South Africa accused Israel at the ICJ over Gaza but refused the ICC request to arrest Bashir in 2015. They even helped him escape!
Is israel going to issue an arrest warrant for Amal Clooney?
What a biased interviewer so condescending and patronising
Isn't it interesting how the "journalist" cuts Natasha off as soon as she starts pushing back with facts?
I really like her voice
🙏🙏🙏🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱💖
i don't see the problem...nothing will come of it
Disgraceful interview. He’s made his mind up and isn’t interested in what she has to say.
Wow. Interviewer stopped Natasha right in the middle of her making a very valid statement. It was obvious, throughout this interview, that there was intent to try to lead Natasha into saying something that would support the interviewer's biased agenda, and when she proved to intelligent to fall into the trap, he abruptly ends it. Wow
Poor interviewer.
the interviewer was rushing this interview like crazy, was someone holding a rod to hit him with behind him?
What an inpolite interwier this man is
The Kangaroo Court has issued a joke ! Hahaha, NOT BLOODY FUNNY !
What a horrible interviewer. Let the guest answer your questions without cutting them off! Who is this interviewer?
STAND WITH ISREAL
Are leaders of Europe antisemitic? Yes, of course. Natasha should be politically correct, i guess, but we can name things what they are.
What a rude journalist! Actually he did not have ptoven facts and just cut Natasha in the ebd when she started speaking about the propaganda war!
Interview ? NOT. Biased interviewer that does not have all the facts at hand.
Don’t trust this interviewer and the ones he represents. In fact, he should be shunned and ostracized, because he believes he’s a “gatekeeper” of information distribution and that should be only for interviewers who are completely objective, and he is clearly not objective. I feel sorry for this interviewer and his inability to think objectively and only cares about clicks. He’s pathetically corrupt and twisted