@@chrisichatzimichail9444 Yeah but *context please* you just lost a final and the interviewer asks you if you weren't prepared ??? And also ask if you are disappointed or not? like...
It was as bad as that reporter last year who kept asking Pernille about her potential transfer right after Wolsburg lost the final. Like, seriously, have some tact. They just had a devastating loss and you're asking those questions. I know, I know, "Well what else are we supposed to ask them?". Honestly, I don't know. But dammit could reporters at least be respectful towards the feelings of the players.
Magdalena, la reportera no tiene razón, tu no tienes la culpa, yo creo que el primer gol, os desconecto del partido y el Barcelona fue superior . Además supo defender bien y aprovechar las ocasiones que tuvo...la vida da muchas vueltas y espero veros en otra final. Eres una buena capitana, un besin desde Asturias( España).
I blame Emma for the tactics, the use of the players and the approach to the game. This was a disappointingly lousy performance. And I don't agree when people say Barcelona is better than Chelsea, they just take advantage of Chelsea's defensive weakness. If only looking at the score and assessing the level is not correct. Barcelona have clearly researched Chelsea very well, they know that the two Chelsea full-backs are often inconsistent and that the three-player midfield doesn't really connect effectively with the defenders. So Barcelona attacked from the beginning, Chelsea's defense was confused and conceded. After that, Barcelona continuously attacked on the wings of Chelsea, if Carter cleared the ball decisively, Chelsea would not be conceded the second goal. Most of the consecutive goals conceded came from the position on the wings. And Emma did nothing to change. Moreover, Barcelona have separated the Chelsea defense from the midfield. I was shocked to see three Chelsea defenders, then five Barcelona players, and then the Chelsea midfield and forwards. And Chelsea also lost the ball many times in the middle of the pitch. This is clearly a game of tactics, not a competition about which player is better, or which team is more classy. Because the Chelsea players are the best WSL players and some of them are world class. Emma should use 4-4-2 or 4-3-2-1. She shouldn't use a 4-3-3 while the two young Chelsea full-backs have no experience of playing big games and the three-player midfield doesn't have the ability to coordinate well defensively with the defenders. Using 4-3-3 when both full-backs are injured, and 2 young players with no experience playing big games is very risky. I could see the tension on Charles and Carter's faces, they were forced to defend well on both sides when the midfielders were far from them. During the game, I often saw Chelsea defending only 3 defenders and the position of the two full-backs was uncertain, the positions were far apart and did not work well together. Obviously Magda and Bright could not defend against the attack of 5-6 Barcelona players. They needed defensive support from their teammates, but the 2 full-backs really didn't play well and the three-players midfield were even play behind Barcelona's five-player line. This was a mistake in the composition of the squad, and throughout the game, Emma did nothing to change it. Only Pernille Harder stands out in attack, but one thing that can be noticed is that she often doesn't play well when teammates in the back usually lose the ball. Pernille Harder is actually a midfielder and she can play well in midfield. The reason why many people think of her as a striker is because she has scored a lot of goals and Emma often uses her as a striker. But not many people know that her forte position is a central midfielder. Clever in reading the game and moving properly will require another strong physical midfielder with her to become an excellent midfield pairing of Chelsea and it's clearly not Ji.
@@demetriusbruno1493 Barcelona don't have better players. Chelsea is a team with world-class players, key players in their national team, Chelsea women is also a team that has been invested a lot of money by the owner, Barcelona can't even buy a Chelsea player because the owner of Barcelona does not invest in women's football, Barcelona only invests in the youth team and men's team. Chelsea play beautiful football and Barcelona play tactical football, that's the difference. Barcelona is ready to do anything to win, even playing dirty. When Chelsea got a throw-in, the Barcelona player deliberately kicked the ball away and she got a yellow card for her playing attitude. During the match Barcelona only had 4 shots on target and 4 goals from Barcelona all hit the position of 2 young Chelsea full-backs. Barcelona only attack on Chelsea's weakness to be able to score. The fact that 2 main full-backs of Chelsea, Maren and Jonna Andersson, are injured is the luck for Barcelona. Chelsea are a team that makes many mistakes in tactics, in the use of players and in the approach to the game, those make Chelsea lose. In football, there is no what so-called "deserve to win" or "don't deserve to win", no strong team or weak team, only win or lose, and two teams will do everything to win. The Chelsea players understood that, so they accepted the result. But if you analyze the game carefully, then Chelsea lost to themselves from the beginning.
@@NANGTlENCA since you clearly only watch Chealsea plays you would not know Barca has a balondor winner in like Mertens top 10 player in Graham Hansen, top striker in Jenni Hermosa and Asista Oshoala and also the number 11 that ran circle around your team is world class as well
@Viv Miedema It was a disappointing performance from Chelsea overall. And I completely agree with you over it being a loss based on tactics. I remember the commentators noting at the beginning that Charles and Carter were apparently also playing on the opposite side from where they normally do. I am no expert in football/soccer, so I'll take what you say about 4-3-3s and 4-3-2-1s. But I totally agree that the defense really needed more support. And the midfield didn't seem to be able to secure or protect the ball. I know there were some points where Ji So-Yun worked her magic, but they were few and far between. And Leupolz was definitely shaken and second guessing herself from the get go because of that first minute own goal. The penalty she conceded shortly after only made it worse. I don't really know what Hayes was thinking with the positions she put Charles and Carter in, but Barcelona just kept taking the ball past the two of them. It seemed like Charles could never keep up with Lieke Martens. And several of the goals were scored with Carter desperately running behind the player she was supposed to mark. Meanwhile on the attacking front, the famed Kerrby connection never materialized, and neither of them seemed to be able to create any good chances. As you said, Pernille Harder carried the attacking game. In that first half it honestly looked like everyone on Chelsea was panicking/lost except for Harder, Bright, and Eriksson (or at least it they appeared to better keep their composure and focus). And I agree with you. This result wasn't from a disparity in talent on the two teams, as both have them in spades. It looks like most of the Barcelona is the Spanish National Team, and they proved how dangerous they could be when they thrashed the Netherlands earlier this year. Lieke Martens is a star on the NEDWNT, and was on the squad that won the 2017 Euros and got silver at the 2019 WWC. Barcelona also has Ana-Maria Crnogorčević, who is the top scorer on the Swiss National team, an incredibly versatile player, and has won the competition before (though she didn't get much play time that game). And, well, Caroline Graham Hansen has definitely proven herself as one of the best wingers in the world. Chelsea has Kerr and Harder, who are regarded as among the top goalscorers in the world (Harder now tied with Denmark's scoring record and also a 2x UEFA women's POTY). Beth England and Fran Kirby are also incredible forwards. Ann-Katrin Berger has (besides this game) had phenomenal performances all season long. Ji So-Yun and Melanie Leupolz are incredible midfielders in their own rights. Maren Mjelde was a core member of the defensive line before her injury. And one only needs to see the team's performances without her to know exactly how vital Eriksson is and her impact on the field (she was on the Swedish squad that won silver at the 2016 olympics that knocked the USWNT out in the quarterfinals) (she also is my favorite, and in my opinion, one of the best defenders in the world). So yes, both teams have incredible players and talent. It's just tactically, Barcelona used them better than Chelsea and was able to exploit and capitalize on any mistakes Chelsea made, forcing the Blues into a desperate game of catch-up to try and get some control over the ball. I really like your analysis. Very in depth and concise. I'm kind of new to the football/soccer world, so it really helped improve my understanding of some of the specifics of what went wrong for Chelsea during the game.
@@demetriusbruno1493 Who is Mertens??? I know Lieke Martens, she is truly a world-class player, she is the standout player in the Barcelona team and I like her and the Dutch team along with Vivianne Miedema and Danielle van de Donk. Before the final, Lieke Martens even texted Miedema to ask about Chelsea's strengths and weaknesses, because Miedema had experience playing against Chelsea. Lieke Martens really wants to win the match and I appreciate that. But I'm talking about the collective, not the individual players. Overall, Chelsea has a better quality of players than Barcelona because they invest more in women's football. The owner of Chelsea is willing to spend a large amount of money to buy as world-class players. Chelsea will certainly buy more quality players in the next transfer window and that will help them overcome weaknesses in defense and midfield. People often say they are bored watching constantly Lyon winning the CL, but Lyon has invested a lot in women's football every year to have such success.
thanks for this!
So sad for chelsea🙄.
Well done Barca...🎉✨✨💖
Is it just me or the journalist was a bit rude 😣
It was Magda was so so upset not right wording
@@chrisichatzimichail9444 Yeah but *context please* you just lost a final and the interviewer asks you if you weren't prepared ??? And also ask if you are disappointed or not? like...
It was as bad as that reporter last year who kept asking Pernille about her potential transfer right after Wolsburg lost the final.
Like, seriously, have some tact. They just had a devastating loss and you're asking those questions. I know, I know, "Well what else are we supposed to ask them?". Honestly, I don't know. But dammit could reporters at least be respectful towards the feelings of the players.
She is a very good player, unlike the rest of the defense.
Magda is the best 😍
Magdalena, la reportera no tiene razón, tu no tienes la culpa, yo creo que el primer gol, os desconecto del partido y el Barcelona fue superior . Además supo defender bien y aprovechar las ocasiones que tuvo...la vida da muchas vueltas y espero veros en otra final. Eres una buena capitana, un besin desde Asturias( España).
I blame Emma for the tactics, the use of the players and the approach to the game. This was a disappointingly lousy performance.
And I don't agree when people say Barcelona is better than Chelsea, they just take advantage of Chelsea's defensive weakness.
If only looking at the score and assessing the level is not correct. Barcelona have clearly researched Chelsea very well, they know that the two Chelsea full-backs are often inconsistent and that the three-player midfield doesn't really connect effectively with the defenders. So Barcelona attacked from the beginning, Chelsea's defense was confused and conceded.
After that, Barcelona continuously attacked on the wings of Chelsea, if Carter cleared the ball decisively, Chelsea would not be conceded the second goal. Most of the consecutive goals conceded came from the position on the wings. And Emma did nothing to change.
Moreover, Barcelona have separated the Chelsea defense from the midfield. I was shocked to see three Chelsea defenders, then five Barcelona players, and then the Chelsea midfield and forwards. And Chelsea also lost the ball many times in the middle of the pitch.
This is clearly a game of tactics, not a competition about which player is better, or which team is more classy. Because the Chelsea players are the best WSL players and some of them are world class.
Emma should use 4-4-2 or 4-3-2-1. She shouldn't use a 4-3-3 while the two young Chelsea full-backs have no experience of playing big games and the three-player midfield doesn't have the ability to coordinate well defensively with the defenders.
Using 4-3-3 when both full-backs are injured, and 2 young players with no experience playing big games is very risky. I could see the tension on Charles and Carter's faces, they were forced to defend well on both sides when the midfielders were far from them.
During the game, I often saw Chelsea defending only 3 defenders and the position of the two full-backs was uncertain, the positions were far apart and did not work well together.
Obviously Magda and Bright could not defend against the attack of 5-6 Barcelona players. They needed defensive support from their teammates, but the 2 full-backs really didn't play well and the three-players midfield were even play behind Barcelona's five-player line.
This was a mistake in the composition of the squad, and throughout the game, Emma did nothing to change it.
Only Pernille Harder stands out in attack, but one thing that can be noticed is that she often doesn't play well when teammates in the back usually lose the ball.
Pernille Harder is actually a midfielder and she can play well in midfield. The reason why many people think of her as a striker is because she has scored a lot of goals and Emma often uses her as a striker. But not many people know that her forte position is a central midfielder.
Clever in reading the game and moving properly will require another strong physical midfielder with her to become an excellent midfield pairing of Chelsea and it's clearly not Ji.
Take the L because barca has better tactics and better players
@@demetriusbruno1493
Barcelona don't have better players. Chelsea is a team with world-class players, key players in their national team, Chelsea women is also a team that has been invested a lot of money by the owner, Barcelona can't even buy a Chelsea player because the owner of Barcelona does not invest in women's football, Barcelona only invests in the youth team and men's team.
Chelsea play beautiful football and Barcelona play tactical football, that's the difference.
Barcelona is ready to do anything to win, even playing dirty. When Chelsea got a throw-in, the Barcelona player deliberately kicked the ball away and she got a yellow card for her playing attitude. During the match Barcelona only had 4 shots on target and 4 goals from Barcelona all hit the position of 2 young Chelsea full-backs. Barcelona only attack on Chelsea's weakness to be able to score. The fact that 2 main full-backs of Chelsea, Maren and Jonna Andersson, are injured is the luck for Barcelona.
Chelsea are a team that makes many mistakes in tactics, in the use of players and in the approach to the game, those make Chelsea lose.
In football, there is no what so-called "deserve to win" or "don't deserve to win", no strong team or weak team, only win or lose, and two teams will do everything to win.
The Chelsea players understood that, so they accepted the result.
But if you analyze the game carefully, then Chelsea lost to themselves from the beginning.
@@NANGTlENCA since you clearly only watch Chealsea plays you would not know Barca has a balondor winner in like Mertens top 10 player in Graham Hansen, top striker in Jenni Hermosa and Asista Oshoala and also the number 11 that ran circle around your team is world class as well
@Viv Miedema It was a disappointing performance from Chelsea overall. And I completely agree with you over it being a loss based on tactics. I remember the commentators noting at the beginning that Charles and Carter were apparently also playing on the opposite side from where they normally do.
I am no expert in football/soccer, so I'll take what you say about 4-3-3s and 4-3-2-1s. But I totally agree that the defense really needed more support. And the midfield didn't seem to be able to secure or protect the ball. I know there were some points where Ji So-Yun worked her magic, but they were few and far between. And Leupolz was definitely shaken and second guessing herself from the get go because of that first minute own goal. The penalty she conceded shortly after only made it worse.
I don't really know what Hayes was thinking with the positions she put Charles and Carter in, but Barcelona just kept taking the ball past the two of them. It seemed like Charles could never keep up with Lieke Martens. And several of the goals were scored with Carter desperately running behind the player she was supposed to mark. Meanwhile on the attacking front, the famed Kerrby connection never materialized, and neither of them seemed to be able to create any good chances. As you said, Pernille Harder carried the attacking game. In that first half it honestly looked like everyone on Chelsea was panicking/lost except for Harder, Bright, and Eriksson (or at least it they appeared to better keep their composure and focus).
And I agree with you. This result wasn't from a disparity in talent on the two teams, as both have them in spades.
It looks like most of the Barcelona is the Spanish National Team, and they proved how dangerous they could be when they thrashed the Netherlands earlier this year. Lieke Martens is a star on the NEDWNT, and was on the squad that won the 2017 Euros and got silver at the 2019 WWC. Barcelona also has Ana-Maria Crnogorčević, who is the top scorer on the Swiss National team, an incredibly versatile player, and has won the competition before (though she didn't get much play time that game). And, well, Caroline Graham Hansen has definitely proven herself as one of the best wingers in the world.
Chelsea has Kerr and Harder, who are regarded as among the top goalscorers in the world (Harder now tied with Denmark's scoring record and also a 2x UEFA women's POTY). Beth England and Fran Kirby are also incredible forwards. Ann-Katrin Berger has (besides this game) had phenomenal performances all season long. Ji So-Yun and Melanie Leupolz are incredible midfielders in their own rights. Maren Mjelde was a core member of the defensive line before her injury. And one only needs to see the team's performances without her to know exactly how vital Eriksson is and her impact on the field (she was on the Swedish squad that won silver at the 2016 olympics that knocked the USWNT out in the quarterfinals) (she also is my favorite, and in my opinion, one of the best defenders in the world).
So yes, both teams have incredible players and talent. It's just tactically, Barcelona used them better than Chelsea and was able to exploit and capitalize on any mistakes Chelsea made, forcing the Blues into a desperate game of catch-up to try and get some control over the ball.
I really like your analysis. Very in depth and concise. I'm kind of new to the football/soccer world, so it really helped improve my understanding of some of the specifics of what went wrong for Chelsea during the game.
@@demetriusbruno1493
Who is Mertens???
I know Lieke Martens, she is truly a world-class player, she is the standout player in the Barcelona team and I like her and the Dutch team along with Vivianne Miedema and Danielle van de Donk.
Before the final, Lieke Martens even texted Miedema to ask about Chelsea's strengths and weaknesses, because Miedema had experience playing against Chelsea. Lieke Martens really wants to win the match and I appreciate that.
But I'm talking about the collective, not the individual players. Overall, Chelsea has a better quality of players than Barcelona because they invest more in women's football. The owner of Chelsea is willing to spend a large amount of money to buy as world-class players. Chelsea will certainly buy more quality players in the next transfer window and that will help them overcome weaknesses in defense and midfield.
People often say they are bored watching constantly Lyon winning the CL, but Lyon has invested a lot in women's football every year to have such success.
Please translate to English. Thanks.
You can turn English captions on for this video to get the translation.