Download PDF From Here: www.pw.live/study/batches/samagra-book-series-batch--hinglish--902582/batch-overview 📳For Free Notes Quizzes and Tests - t.me/pw_upsc
9:10 Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975) 19:17 - article 31 is constitutional right by 44th amendment act 1978 goes to part 4 DPSP article 300A. 37:01- person name was Raj Narain 41:20 - article 19(1)(f) ensures that any person's right against his property remains protected. 48:39 - Minerva mills case ensures harmony between FRs and DPSP 49:19 - collegium system 99th amendment act 2014 NJAC national judicial appointment commission 57:14 - Indra Sawhney case related to reservation of socially backward classes
9:03 Indira Nehru Gandhi case 1975 versus Raj Narain 19:07 right to property removed from fundamental right and added as a constitutional right in article 300A 37:01 the person name Raj Narain 41:18 right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property was one of the fundamental rights enshrined in Article 19(1)(f) of the Indian Constitution.
22:33 the way sir said "ACT" was so funny it suddenly made me laugh .😅 I'm not insulting sir I respect him from botom of my heart and and also his efforts towards us. Please don't take serious I'm not humiliting sir.🙏
The main difference lies in their SOURCE & SCOPE ! CRs are derived from a country's Constitution (Supreme Law of the Land). These are considered fundamental & are usually protected by the highest law in the country While LRs encompass a broader range of rights granted by Laws and Statutes, which may or may not be directly based on the Constitution. Some LRs may be CRs as well, there are also LRs that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but are estd. through other legislative processes. To summarize, CRs are mostly FRs enshrined in the Constitution, while LRs refer to a wide variety of rights granted by Laws & Regulations at various levels.
So, The 9th Schedule contains a list of central and state laws which cannot be challenged in courts and was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951. (UP Land Reform Act, Bihar Land Reform Act, etc) The first Amendment added 13 laws to the Schedule. Subsequent amendments in various years have taken the number of protected laws to 284 currently. So, till 1973, no Law placed in this Schedule can be challenged in any court on any ground. But SC has cleared this position by saying that this shield cannot protect such laws placed after 24/4/1973 Hence it seemed, that 9th Schedule is acting like a "Black Hole" at the start. If still not clear, I'll discuss over Telegram or some other mode
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC sir clear hogaya ..thank you sir ... Matlab pahle toh tha Black hole 1973 tak .. But uske baad se SC ne clear kar diya ki protecting shield tumhaari ab ni chalegi ☺️!! Thanks 😊 sir ...
No, judicial review and judicial interpretation are not the same thing, although they are related concepts in the field of law. Judicial Review: Judicial review is the process by which courts review the actions of the executive branch (government agencies and officials) and legislative branch (laws passed by legislatures) to ensure they are in accordance with the constitution. In other words, it's the power of the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and government actions. This allows the judiciary to strike down laws or actions that are deemed unconstitutional. Judicial Interpretation: Judicial interpretation refers to the process by which courts interpret and apply the law, including statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions, to specific cases that come before them. Judges often need to interpret the language of the law to determine its meaning and how it applies in a particular situation. This can involve analyzing the legislative intent, precedent (previous court decisions), and other relevant factors. While judicial interpretation is a broader concept that involves understanding and applying the law, judicial review specifically focuses on the power of courts to assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions. In many cases, judicial interpretation plays a role in the process of judicial review, as judges need to interpret the constitution and other legal texts to determine whether a law or action is consistent with them.
@@riyachoudhary580 In Lok Sabha, the MPs which we elect, represent us. In Rajya Sabha, there are MPs whom we don't elect, but they are elected by the Members of State Legislative Assemblies to represent that particular State
Gud evening sir, I am mohini and I have just started preparation.. But have no clue that either I will be able to do this with these lectures only or not..... Please i request uh to reply. 😊
I want you to : A. Have the syllabus with you. B. Have the Previous Years' Questions with you. C. Start reading newspaper on your own, then watch any good video on current affairs to get the idea of what to read from the newspapers. D. Watch the Book Series Videos and make notes in a few pages. E. Revise F. Take Tests G. Succeed ! ! ! 🙂
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC Sir it seems very nice✨..as you are managing time to answer our questions..even with the very busy schedule.. and sir your teaching style is amazing✨🙏..sir ..I just want to ask is it necessary to buy book or thes notes only can be sufficient for preparation...🙂
@@shiiviikuhar Look at it in this way : at what stage of preparation you're at. Are you going to take your attempt within the next 2 years ? if the answer to this is yes, then definitely you need the books to make a second reading. Video Lectures help in the first reading if you're a beginner (or if you have any doubt anywhere)
Doctrine/dogma is not a theory! 😂. Doctrine in this context means “stated principles held by the Supreme Court”. Theory is an altogether different thing, a dispassionate and disinterested exercise. Conflating them will create more confusion!
Download PDF From Here: www.pw.live/study/batches/samagra-book-series-batch--hinglish--902582/batch-overview
📳For Free Notes Quizzes and Tests - t.me/pw_upsc
Sir syllabus kb complete hoga
Aap jldi jldi lectures upload kijiye plz
Can anybody tell me how I get quizzes and tests on telegram
Where to find the quiz and test of the lecture...??
Pdf nhi mil rha sir
9:10 Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975)
19:17 - article 31 is constitutional right by 44th amendment act 1978 goes to part 4 DPSP article 300A.
37:01- person name was Raj Narain
41:20 - article 19(1)(f) ensures that any person's right against his property remains protected.
48:39 - Minerva mills case ensures harmony between FRs and DPSP
49:19 - collegium system 99th amendment act 2014 NJAC national judicial appointment commission
57:14 - Indra Sawhney case related to reservation of socially backward classes
Sir right to occupation is 19 1( g) @Movieclips89o0ol
9:03 Indira Nehru Gandhi case 1975 versus Raj Narain
19:07 right to property removed from fundamental right and added as a constitutional right in article 300A
37:01 the person name Raj Narain
41:18 right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property was one of the fundamental rights enshrined in Article 19(1)(f) of the Indian Constitution.
Amazing lecture. I felt like absorb atleast 30% in this lecture only
9:25-- Indira gandhi va raj narain (1975)
37:03 -raj narain
time 41:21 Article 19(1)(f) --- Ensures that any person's right against his property remains protected.
Art 19 1 (f) right to Acquire Hold Dispose of property - Repealed
Art 19 f right to practice any profesion n to carry occupation any trade or business
@@MehranaamtolangouAngom-do9yc
Sir jo ap bta rhe hai wo 19 1 g hai
Thank you sir❤❤❤
Time-- 57:10 Indra Sawhney and union of India (1994) upheld the constitutional validity of 27% reservation for the ObCs
Thankyou very much sir....❤
Best teacher ever❤
Chapter 12 done ✅
Sir g pranam 🕉🙏
Jai Hind Sir😇
Thankyou sir 🙂
Chapter 12 done
One part of polity is complete ❤🎉😅
22:33 the way sir said "ACT" was so funny it suddenly made me laugh .😅
I'm not insulting sir I respect him from botom of my heart and and also his efforts towards us. Please don't take serious I'm not humiliting sir.🙏
😆indeed its funny !
Good Evening sir ❤
Aditya sir op!
thnkew sooo much for such meaningful session
Sir i m a begginer. Or I have a ques that jaise Coelho case ke bare me ques pucha gya tha to sare cases jo de rkhe h usko deeply padhna chahye
Awesome session tnx sir❤❤❤
Love you PW Only IAS ❤❤❤
Jai Hind Sir,...
Thank-you sir
Article 19 (f) is related to right to property.
36:35 time Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975)
Mst explanation ❤️
Keep it up sir.
Thanks sir
जितनी तारीफ़ करे उतनी ही कम ❤❤❤
Sir one question - what is the difference between constitutional right or legal right??
The main difference lies in their SOURCE & SCOPE !
CRs are derived from a country's Constitution (Supreme Law of the Land). These are considered fundamental & are usually protected by the highest law in the country
While LRs encompass a broader range of rights granted by Laws and Statutes, which may or may not be directly based on the Constitution. Some LRs may be CRs as well, there are also LRs that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but are estd. through other legislative processes.
To summarize, CRs are mostly FRs enshrined in the Constitution, while LRs refer to a wide variety of rights granted by Laws & Regulations at various levels.
Thank you sir 🙏🙏
Great sir
Best class
Thankyou so much sir ... completed♥️
01:02:47
Thanks
42:27 42:29 😊😊
❤ 42:58 😊
Jai prakash narayan 36:52
Completed sir ❤.
Sir may I know from where can i find the weekly tests ???? It would be helpful thankyou
agr pta chle to batana ...
Thank you sir the sessions are very helpful
First like first comment
Kyaa ukhad liya 😂
Wowww class agyi hai❤
Sir "Black hole " please next class m dobara samjhana kyu ki confusion h ! Humble request ❤️
So, The 9th Schedule contains a list of central and state laws which cannot be challenged in courts and was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951. (UP Land Reform Act, Bihar Land Reform Act, etc)
The first Amendment added 13 laws to the Schedule. Subsequent amendments in various years have taken the number of protected laws to 284 currently.
So, till 1973, no Law placed in this Schedule can be challenged in any court on any ground. But SC has cleared this position by saying that this shield cannot protect such laws placed after 24/4/1973
Hence it seemed, that 9th Schedule is acting like a "Black Hole" at the start.
If still not clear, I'll discuss over Telegram or some other mode
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC sir clear hogaya ..thank you sir ...
Matlab pahle toh tha Black hole 1973 tak ..
But uske baad se SC ne clear kar diya ki protecting shield tumhaari ab ni chalegi ☺️!!
Thanks 😊 sir ...
🙏🏻🙏🏻👌🏻❣️thnk u sir ❤
First like first comment first veiw
Article 300A right to property, NJAC ( national judicial appointment commission) act 2014.
42:41 42:41 😮😊
Please Launch Mathematics optional
thanks for wonderful explanation @onlyIAS UPSC
First viewer 😅😅
Present Sir.
4:08 sir esi konsi deformity hoti hai 😂
Untouchability under article...17
🎉NJAC 99 CAA,2014 SC Null ,r diya tha because Article 50 ka,
Njac ( national judicial appointment commission)
Thanks sir
Pdf kese download hoga
Superb
Sir, judicial review and judicial interpretation are one and same thing??
No, judicial review and judicial interpretation are not the same thing, although they are related concepts in the field of law.
Judicial Review: Judicial review is the process by which courts review the actions of the executive branch (government agencies and officials) and legislative branch (laws passed by legislatures) to ensure they are in accordance with the constitution. In other words, it's the power of the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and government actions. This allows the judiciary to strike down laws or actions that are deemed unconstitutional.
Judicial Interpretation: Judicial interpretation refers to the process by which courts interpret and apply the law, including statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions, to specific cases that come before them. Judges often need to interpret the language of the law to determine its meaning and how it applies in a particular situation. This can involve analyzing the legislative intent, precedent (previous court decisions), and other relevant factors.
While judicial interpretation is a broader concept that involves understanding and applying the law, judicial review specifically focuses on the power of courts to assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions. In many cases, judicial interpretation plays a role in the process of judicial review, as judges need to interpret the constitution and other legal texts to determine whether a law or action is consistent with them.
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC thanks brother 😊
No
42:09 😊
Sir, is it enough notes which you teach in blackboard?
Please sir reply
Bhai UPSC ke liye laxmikant ko 5 baar reading kar
1 baar achhay se padh aur 2 baar revision kar
Phir shayd enough hai
It can be more easier and deatiled.
How to get this pdf???
First view🎉😊
❤❤❤
Sir i have a question ❓
Sir Parliament and Rajyasabha ek hi h ya alag h ? Or agr h toh parliament m kon beth ta h ?
Bilkul alag alag hai... Dhyan se padho
Ok ... parliament = President+ loksabha+Rajyasabha
@@riyachoudhary580 In Lok Sabha, the MPs which we elect, represent us.
In Rajya Sabha, there are MPs whom we don't elect, but they are elected by the Members of State Legislative Assemblies to represent that particular State
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC thanks ❤️ sir
@@riyachoudhary580 right
Dhamakdar chapter 😅😅😅 finishing
Hii sir
It's Article 17who says about untouchability not Article 15
Gud evening sir,
I am mohini and I have just started preparation.. But have no clue that either I will be able to do this with these lectures only or not..... Please i request uh to reply. 😊
I want you to :
A. Have the syllabus with you.
B. Have the Previous Years' Questions with you.
C. Start reading newspaper on your own, then watch any good video on current affairs to get the idea of what to read from the newspapers.
D. Watch the Book Series Videos and make notes in a few pages.
E. Revise
F. Take Tests
G. Succeed ! ! ! 🙂
@@AdityaTiwariUPSC
Sir it seems very nice✨..as you are managing time to answer our questions..even with the very busy schedule.. and sir your teaching style is amazing✨🙏..sir ..I just want to ask is it necessary to buy book or thes notes only can be sufficient for preparation...🙂
@@shiiviikuhar Look at it in this way : at what stage of preparation you're at. Are you going to take your attempt within the next 2 years ? if the answer to this is yes, then definitely you need the books to make a second reading. Video Lectures help in the first reading if you're a beginner (or if you have any doubt anywhere)
@@AdityaTiwariUPSCthank you so much sir 😊
How to get pdf of this lecture
Sir, test series nahi hai
But sir beshak CAA ek law toh nhi hai lekin changes toh le hi ata hai na vo or fir usko kyu supreme court nai assume nhi kiya?
Sir pdf kha mile gii
Sir 7th edition aa chuka hai....
Can any one answer where to find the quiz and tests of the lecture.....??
Same problem aapko mile to please bta dena
Is here anybody for upsc 2025
@@DeepakYadav-x011 yes
Doctrine/dogma is not a theory! 😂. Doctrine in this context means “stated principles held by the Supreme Court”. Theory is an altogether different thing, a dispassionate and disinterested exercise. Conflating them will create more confusion!
Indira gandhi vs raj narayan case 1975
What's "female - judge" . Judge is judge.
Devi ji sir bata rahe hai ki wo judge male na hoke female thi inte serious mat hoa
He is preparing for civil services & doesnt no how to talk with Guru@@VisumaKaralis
Women ☕
Why are you preparing for UPSC??😂😂😂
Why so serious? Don’t know why people get offended so easily nowadays…
Can anybody tell me how I get quizzes and tests on telegram?
Njac
right to property is a legal right now
sir example😆😅🤣
Thanks sir
Thank you sir ❤
Thanku sir 😊
❤
thankyou sir
ThankYou Sir ❤
Thank you sir 🙏🏻❤
❤