Why Didn't the Allies Declare War on the USSR when it Invaded Poland? (Short Animated Documentary)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มิ.ย. 2024
  • As you'll know World War 2 (in Europe) began with Britain and France declaring war on Germany after it invaded Poland. But when the USSR invaded soon afterwards, the allies did nothing. But why? Why was there no declaration of war on the Soviet Union? Find out in this short and simple animated history documentary.
    Twitter: / tenminhistory
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=4973164
    Merch: teespring.com/stores/history-...
    A special thanks to all of these Patrons below, without whom the show wouldn't be possible:
    Franco La Bruna
    Kevin Sanders
    Chris Fatta
    Richard Wolfe
    Gregory - The Bittersteel
    Stefan Møller
    anon
    sharpie660
    Ian Jensen
    SirAlpaka
    D. Mahlik
    Qi Xiao
    Dragan
    Andrew Miraut
    Dexter_McAaron
    Wolf
    Andrew Niedbala
    Rod D. Martin
    John Garcia
    Ariadni Voulgari
    Paul McGee
    Nathan Perlman
    Bernardo Santos
    Danny Anstess
    Henry Rabung
    Tristan Kreller
    Jane Sumpter
    Chris Hall
    Christopher Godfrey
    Christopher S Nelson
    Perry Gagne
    Shaun Pullin
    Warren Rudkin
    James Bisonette Fan #1
    Magdalena Reinberg-Leibel
    bas mensink
    Joooooshhhhhh
    jdk
    Troy Schmidt
    Alen
    Blake Dryad
    I'm Not In The Description
    Cap
    William Wold
    Jeffrey Schneider
    FF Nelly
    Mark Ploegstra
    Liam Gilleece
    Kinfe85
    Luke Robinson
    Haydn Noble
    MrPalomino
    Josh Cornelius
    Colm Boyle
    TooMuchWaterYouDie
    HelloAgainThere
    Julian Baumann
    Richard Manklow
    Nick Finan
    Colin Steele
    Gabriel Lunde
    João Santos
    Christine Purvis
    Konstantin Bredyuk
    Big Nick
    Donald Weaver
    Steve Bonds
    Seth Reeves
    Pierre Le Mouel
    Sources:
    British Reactions to the Soviet Occupation of Eastern Poland in September 1939 by Keith Sword
    POLAND IN BRITISH AND FRENCH POLICY IN 1939: DETERMINATION TO FIGHT-OR AVOID WAR? by ANNA M. CIENCIALA
    Choosing Not to Choose in 1939: Poland's Assessment of the Nazi-Soviet Pact by MAREK KORNAT

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @redandinata4568
    @redandinata4568 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13511

    The blue color in Poland's flag stands for loyal allies

    • @Makarosc
      @Makarosc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +408

      Which it never possessed

    • @user-lk3dy4uy8w
      @user-lk3dy4uy8w 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1419

      There isn't any
      *Oh wait, that's the jok-*

    • @jahmah519
      @jahmah519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      Well said, Britain is your friend & does have allies, 🇨🇦 Australia 🇦🇺 & New Zealand 🇳🇿, defo

    • @bork661
      @bork661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +169

      Honestly in this case there wouldn't have been a scenario where Poland wouldn't be occupied. Even if they would have put enormous amount if troops in Poland, they would Just end up weakaning their armies, since Germany could have easily cut them off at Danzig. The polish government probably new this and with as it happened atleast they didn't cease to exist.

    • @Makarosc
      @Makarosc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

      @@jahmah519 you all literally left them to die

  • @Czar_Moss
    @Czar_Moss ปีที่แล้ว +2704

    I love how Europe does either A) full continental war that kills millions or B) write a strongly worded letter asking someone to stop committing atrocities

    • @TikkiYT
      @TikkiYT ปีที่แล้ว +183

      Churchill methods vs Chamberlain methods

    • @irenaveksler1935
      @irenaveksler1935 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@TikkiYTLmao
      So true though

    • @irenaveksler1935
      @irenaveksler1935 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@TikkiYTGiga Chad Churchill Vs Weak Chamberlain

    • @joaobran2712
      @joaobran2712 ปีที่แล้ว

      Satan USA is genocider and criminal in impunity

    • @Czar_Moss
      @Czar_Moss ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joaobran2712 ok

  • @AloisAgos
    @AloisAgos ปีที่แล้ว +1518

    Poland: "Will you be by our side?"
    Europe: "We will attend your funeral yes."
    Poland: -_-

    • @megalodonek8377
      @megalodonek8377 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Ye europe pretty much treated us like shit

    • @Unicalnetwork
      @Unicalnetwork ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Poland: "Will you be by my side?"
      NKVD: "It is now ouг siде, comaгaде"

    • @ericfaz1427
      @ericfaz1427 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Where else would pallbearers be.

    • @lovelypiroff6964
      @lovelypiroff6964 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@megalodonek8377 Poland: again?
      Europe: Always. Now go clean my bri'ish toilet

    • @tikhonoldwood3800
      @tikhonoldwood3800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Unicalnetworksorry, man, but you better not write using cyrilic alphabet

  • @majike0355
    @majike0355 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    "Also, they would've lost."
    Sneaking that in there at the last possible second of the video lol

  • @Grymbaldknight
    @Grymbaldknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12298

    *France:* "Should we stop the Soviets invading Poland?"
    *UK:* "Nah, maybe leave it. Something tells me that this cooperation between Germany and the Soviets won't last."
    _[Germany and the Soviets start fighting]_
    *UK:* "See, France, what did i te--- oh, you've been conquered."

    • @NorthCamZ
      @NorthCamZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +627

      Very true but I would hate to see what would have happened if Britain went to war against Germany and the ussr, with the out of date technology and lack of mechanical warfare capabilities from France and just the shier size of the ussr defeat would be inevitable and without the UK fighting the Germans anymore. The Nazis may have actually won the war in Europe and god knows what would have happened if the people of the USSR got to friendly with the Germans. Oh wait, boom invasion, now the whole of Europe is Nazi controlled. So I think the British made the best and only intelligent decision

    • @sulil1938
      @sulil1938 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      F

    • @GitSumGaming
      @GitSumGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +237

      More like: France: *raises white flag when Poland gets invaded*

    • @Techie1224
      @Techie1224 4 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      france: we are the super power and we are declaring war at germany ..
      rommel and his friends : ok why not take a tour in Belgium ،😂

    • @RexOedipus.
      @RexOedipus. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      @@NorthCamZ There was an invasion of the saarland. The French saw that it was devoid of troops. Thought it was a trap and fucked off. If France decided to not refight the last war and be tramatised of trench lines they had a straight shot to Berlin cause everything was thrown at Poland and later Czechs.

  • @Randomperson-ts8bm
    @Randomperson-ts8bm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13318

    When you didn't ask this before but you realise that it is a good question.

    • @andrewlentner
      @andrewlentner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +259

      I swear I think that every time I see the title for a video from this channel

    • @TristanHaugh
      @TristanHaugh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I researched this topic for a history paper.

    • @dday881
      @dday881 4 ปีที่แล้ว +158

      That’s why I think this channel made a smart move in productions shorter videos answering very interesting and often overlooked questions about history, as opposed to the 10 minute summary videos of well-documented topics like he used to do. More videos and more interested viewers.

    • @yetigriff
      @yetigriff 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      It's because of the cultural Marxists in the universities causing a nihilist approach to the Gulag Archipelago

    • @TheZeldaCinema
      @TheZeldaCinema 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      If you never asked this question then your education has frankly failed you

  • @danielblumberg308
    @danielblumberg308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +780

    The answer for this question is simple:
    They didn’t want USSR to declare war on them as Nazi germany was strong enough alone

    • @reichbunny713
      @reichbunny713 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Nah it’s because friendly fire

    • @threathy
      @threathy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not like what you think.

    • @bobshenix
      @bobshenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      The invasion of Poland was the whole pretext for declaring war in the first place, though. There was no WW2 prior to this.

    • @toxicman9128
      @toxicman9128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Say sike

    • @ulquiorra635
      @ulquiorra635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Fckn Truth - They didn't help cuz they had Poland deeply in ass and they had no fckn balls. Also They probably thought that Hitler would leave uk and France alone.

  • @Czar_Moss
    @Czar_Moss ปีที่แล้ว +329

    I love how blissfully naive post ww1 Europe seemed
    "we gave Poland independence, so there's no way foreign forces would invade! war problem = solved"

    • @archaon1400
      @archaon1400 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It was a meme lol poland had to fight with everyone around it to preserve itself with only france supporting it fron the start. And it was a diplomatic support only, when the polish-ussr war broke out every european govermnet was busy dealing with communists in their own countries like germany where they started a civil war awaiting the red army. Naive was to think hitler would stop but nobody was naive about poland. It is just realism. Extremly sad realism…

    • @Timmerdetimmerdetim
      @Timmerdetimmerdetim ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe if you want to make a political statement, you should make it.

    • @Czar_Moss
      @Czar_Moss ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Timmerdetimmerdetim bro why are you trying to get upset about smth it's joke on how Poland gets invaded a lot relax with your keyboard warrioring

    • @Timmerdetimmerdetim
      @Timmerdetimmerdetim ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Czar_Moss There's nothing funny about Poland being invaded and nothing "to love" about it. Maybe we can agree on that at least?

    • @Czar_Moss
      @Czar_Moss ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tim Joye oh sorry too soon? 83ish years not enough time?

  • @18utkb
    @18utkb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4495

    UK's Strongly worded letter:
    *Dearest Joseph*
    *The wasn't very nice of you*
    *Best wishes,*
    *Neville*

    • @NotSteveCook
      @NotSteveCook 3 ปีที่แล้ว +149

      Pretty much the impact of the Munich Pact

    • @thomasfreshrap953
      @thomasfreshrap953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      I declare this to be a archive of the message

    • @scott-435
      @scott-435 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      AznGuy Jr. when you stole that reply

    • @stephencarroll9935
      @stephencarroll9935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Copied

    • @NotMyUsualPersona
      @NotMyUsualPersona 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I wish it was written: " That wasn't very COMRADE of you"

  • @erikthomsen4768
    @erikthomsen4768 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3301

    France and Britain: “Some of you may die. But that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.”

    • @rowmagnvs
      @rowmagnvs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      What were they supposed to do?

    • @haldir3120
      @haldir3120 4 ปีที่แล้ว +278

      @@rowmagnvs Honour their part and attack Germany maybe? Instead of just sitting on there for nine month just to get overrun in six weeks.

    • @adamdesouza6153
      @adamdesouza6153 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Paul There were offensive plans and the allied planning board basically got turned upside down when the Soviet Union invaded Poland because it was assumed the Polish army could stand up to Germany for a year

    • @IonorReasSpamGenerator
      @IonorReasSpamGenerator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@haldir3120 Considering how well France and the UK did together in defense of France and fact that the only UK had somewhat up to date air force and an expeditionary force of a limited number, that would not end very well even when looking at Wikipedia numbers may suggest otherwise...
      French actually somewhat invaded Germany (few km) but they stopped before the German defensive line, again, their army was not built for some coordinated deep penetration operations (lack of radios in their thick but slow poorly designed tanks making some pincers encirclement unrealistic against better-equipped fast German armor which was able to reposition within a week from attacking poorly equipped Poland, limited French logistics for adequate supply chain during the attack, etc.). Neither French WW2 air force was something legends being written about and Germans would fear of... The only possible way of French/UK invasion being sufficiently protected was if the UK would send all its fighter planes to French airfields at the expense of leaving the UK undefended and open for the Nazi medium bomber attacks...

    • @LHSMeleeClub
      @LHSMeleeClub 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      SHREKIN

  • @blackrider2323
    @blackrider2323 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I love the funnyparts you add to the videos. “…harshest measures known : a strongly, worded letter“. I laughed out loud every single time you drop one of these nuggets into your videos!

  • @waughy9103
    @waughy9103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This guy is the king of answering questions no one thought about

  • @Muhammed552
    @Muhammed552 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1565

    one answer
    *Distant War
    * modifier

    • @Bigdeathy
      @Bigdeathy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      It was defensiv though (*distant war* is only for an agressiv call to arms)

    • @kasp9290
      @kasp9290 4 ปีที่แล้ว +126

      actually france and britain were 432845 ducats in debt

    • @thomasfazey5755
      @thomasfazey5755 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Dishonored Call to Arms Noises

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@thomasfazey5755 The AI don't get dishonoured call to arms though.

    • @Pyrokan
      @Pyrokan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@markhenley3097 It was mp though

  • @Robbstark2024
    @Robbstark2024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5612

    Allies: “we aren’t going to start a war with soviets even if it is justified because they’re insanely powerful and we are already engaged on other fronts.”
    Axis: “so anyways I started blasting”

    • @jaszczomp9923
      @jaszczomp9923 4 ปีที่แล้ว +342

      @nickys34 Poland was a country for a long time before WWI, until partitions of Poland happened.

    • @Abdul54cp
      @Abdul54cp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      Check a map of languages in 1937 poland, the ukrainian and belarussian areas HEAVILY overlaps with what the USSR invaded. This is because the land they conquered back WAS the area poland opportunisitcally took mid civil war

    • @cyprienvieville6940
      @cyprienvieville6940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +189

      @nickys34 pretty sure Poland existed from the 10th century till 1795, which is before ww1

    • @jaszczomp9923
      @jaszczomp9923 4 ปีที่แล้ว +183

      @OVOD.net 1. Poland did not capitulate by the time soviets invaded.
      2. Just like Russian Empire illegally annexed this land from Poland-Lithuania during partitions of Poland.
      3. Poland did not ally with Germany, Zaolzie that you're talking about was invaded and annexed by Czechs during polish-soviet war.

    • @cyprienvieville6940
      @cyprienvieville6940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +157

      @OVOD.net Poland actually never officially capitulated, the government went in exile in the UK, so the ussr invaded Poland.

  • @Fika_Break
    @Fika_Break 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Sneaking in “Also..they’d have lost” at the end. 😂

  • @deplorabledegenerate2630
    @deplorabledegenerate2630 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Also, they were actually drawing up plans to bomb the Caucus oil fields after the USSR's poor performance against Finland. Though, as you might know, the USSR's poor performance against Finland was noticed by someone else who acted first.

    • @TerminatorHIX
      @TerminatorHIX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Operation Pike, it was called. Documents about the plan were captured by the Germans in France and leaked by the Nazi press.

  • @riptidemonzarc3103
    @riptidemonzarc3103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3375

    "They both felt that Poland was entirely lost"
    ... that's funny, because Poland's national anthem is entitled 'Poland is Not Yet Lost"

    • @trollman3894
      @trollman3894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      This defines a bruh moment

    • @rosiefay7283
      @rosiefay7283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +119

      Poland: "I'm not dead yet"

    • @JohanIngeborg
      @JohanIngeborg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +207

      German anthem: "We are the best"
      Polish anthem: 'We are not the worst"

    • @UnosRecens
      @UnosRecens 2 ปีที่แล้ว +115

      There is no “yet” there. This would suggest that poles are awaiting their demise.
      “Poland is not dead,
      while we are alive”

    • @MagicButterz
      @MagicButterz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      2 of the strongest world powers double teaming you without a condom, what else can you expect lol

  • @qfox16789
    @qfox16789 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1812

    something something James bizanet

    • @dr_Matt-nc3ne
      @dr_Matt-nc3ne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Football Stat’66 lol ikr

    • @cruzgomes5660
      @cruzgomes5660 4 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Rob Waterhouse

    • @DiracComb.7585
      @DiracComb.7585 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Football Stat’66 don’t forget Winston kayword (yeah, yeah, it’s probably spelled wrong)

    • @piggyblitz4404
      @piggyblitz4404 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Izzy?

    • @Deerkins
      @Deerkins 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Spinning 3 Plates

  • @tim_mothy
    @tim_mothy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I love your videos! So concise and informative, and the animations are so cute!

  • @nikolatasev4948
    @nikolatasev4948 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    80 years later, nothing has changed.
    "We will not stand by when a nation launches an unjustifiable invasion upon its neighbor!"
    "Oh, great, this mean you will at least put sanctions on Saudi Arabia and Tu..."
    "No, we only meant Russia."

    • @Cosmic_Potato7
      @Cosmic_Potato7 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tu?

    • @nikolatasev4948
      @nikolatasev4948 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Cosmic_Potato7 Turkey.

    • @asnekboi7232
      @asnekboi7232 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The realpolitik reigns supreme

    • @nikolatasev4948
      @nikolatasev4948 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@asnekboi7232 I dream of a day when equal rules and the common good prevail over narrow interests. But today is not that day.

    • @asnekboi7232
      @asnekboi7232 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nikolatasev4948 then you shall dream till the sun consumes the earth

  • @keygrip236
    @keygrip236 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3483

    One of the reasons:
    - *World Tension was just below 24%* 😂

    • @MikhaelAhava
      @MikhaelAhava 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Wow.

    • @lolmanmagee2785
      @lolmanmagee2785 4 ปีที่แล้ว +202

      hoi 4 reference was not excepting that

    • @math3000
      @math3000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      Another reason: Germany formed the Berlin-Moscow Axis

    • @TheJMBon
      @TheJMBon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Another reason: Fascists came to power in the US and Brazil invaded all of South America and is now a beligerent super power.

    • @Warsie
      @Warsie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@lolmanmagee2785 honestly i was there jokes appear everyehere on ww2 videos lol

  • @JPGRRocksProductions
    @JPGRRocksProductions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1850

    “This is like the fourth time.” As a Pole myself, this cracks me up.

    • @infirmux
      @infirmux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      we should have learned by now, that either we'll be strong enough ourselves, or with very strong REAL ties to our allies, or we'll be doomed AGAIN.

    • @ooi97
      @ooi97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I didn't get it. Wasn't it the second time?

    • @cristianokiki1486
      @cristianokiki1486 3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      @@ooi97 prussia, austria and russia ganged up on poland in past when it was polish-lithuanian commonwealth 3 times

    • @kristupas_
      @kristupas_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      ​@@cristianokiki1486I think all three partitions of Commonwealth should be counted as first time. But later there were Duchy of Warsaw and Kingdom of Poland (Congress Poland), which were semi-autonomous Polish states. Moreover Free City of Cracow and Grand Duchy of Posen (to some extent) may also be counted.

    • @cristianokiki1486
      @cristianokiki1486 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kristupas_ they were 3 diferent times and I think not all 3 partutions had all 3 states

  • @leonw5328
    @leonw5328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have been asking myself that for a while now, thank you for clearing thinks up.

  • @alfonsonishikawa
    @alfonsonishikawa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video. I was wondering this for centuries.

  • @billt8504
    @billt8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2302

    I talked to a Brit way long time ago, like in the early 1990's. He said, growing up in school, kids are taught the primary goal of England's foreign policy is "don't ever let anyone unify the continent." Meaning, if any continental power becomes strong, side with their weaker opponents. When Spain was strong, Britain supported Spain's opponents. When Napoleon popped up, Britain supported France's opponents. When Germany got strong, you have to support Germany's opponents, which happened to include the USSR. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend, for now" - perfectly applied.

    • @oliversmith7130
      @oliversmith7130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +244

      That's the reason for Brexit, now I get it, thanks

    • @alexvig2369
      @alexvig2369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +343

      I forgot how this video is titled, but this is actually true. There's a video from a UK satire show from the 2000s where they laugh about the idea of the UK quitting the EU. And the actor playing the diplomat said: "we joined the EU to destabilize it from within, and then we're going to quit to destabilize it again. Our centuries-old foreign policy of never letting the continent unite."
      This view is *very* engrained in English society.

    • @mar07in
      @mar07in 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      NATO is slowly unifying the continent - what will happen then I wonder?

    • @juandavidmm
      @juandavidmm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@mar07in scary guessing game you got in your hands.

    • @abbyalphonse499
      @abbyalphonse499 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oliversmith7130 No, brexit was due to stupidity and politicians taking advantage of eurosceptism to make a few pennies for themselves.

  • @ToLWaM
    @ToLWaM 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4103

    I’m currently reading the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. This was actually one of the biggest questions I had going into the book. Basically, the last thing the allies wanted was to be at war with anyone other than Germany.

    • @highcouncil1302
      @highcouncil1302 4 ปีที่แล้ว +340

      It's kind of hard to fight two front Wars ask Hitler

    • @alexg4711
      @alexg4711 4 ปีที่แล้ว +280

      well it shows that the didnt care about poland (which is obv if you look at what happened after ww2) and simply wanted to quash germany again

    • @Imperium83
      @Imperium83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +447

      It's almost as if it was another global conspiracy to shut down an ideology and economy that didn't have international finance's best interests at heart...

    • @jamiengo2343
      @jamiengo2343 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Western Unity the USSR invaded Poland afterwards...

    • @108nighthawk
      @108nighthawk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Western Unity I was going to read it myself when I found out about the backlash against Shirer. I was very disappointed. I still have A World at Arms by Weinberg though, and that was a great read.

  • @chrisbrendandavis
    @chrisbrendandavis ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sweet and succinct. And better than 100 pages of lofty articles for class.

  • @vancouver4sure
    @vancouver4sure 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That betrayal of Poland was so awful.

  • @smilingearth5181
    @smilingearth5181 4 ปีที่แล้ว +677

    Poland: pls help we're being invaded
    UK: that sounds like a "you" problem

    • @Tethloach1
      @Tethloach1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      lol so true

    • @mann536
      @mann536 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      British empire losses 500,000 casualties. Thats enough help considering the uk and her allies can have peace with the germany but didnt

    • @crumpetgamer
      @crumpetgamer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Actually the opposite Bud Look up operation unthinkable Britain always had the end goal of defeating Germany then moving on too the ussr

    • @serenityssolace
      @serenityssolace 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Actually its the opposite. Britain started WW2 by defending Poland. UK declined 27 peace appeals from Nazi Germany. Investigate the Rudolf Hess incident. Where he tried to negotiate peace with Britain only to get arrested and killed by them

    • @jeanbethencourt1506
      @jeanbethencourt1506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@serenityssolace Facts. The Anglos were the main warmongers here. Starting a war they eventually needed Americans to finish for them.

  • @maddie9602
    @maddie9602 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2203

    "Britain and France didn't intervene when the Soviet Union invaded Poland because they felt that Germany and the USSR were going to turn on each other and the Soviets would be a valuable ally against Germany."
    Well, they weren't wrong.

    • @DiegoDiaz-vm9xx
      @DiegoDiaz-vm9xx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +433

      The only part they weren't counting on was France getting its ass kicked in a matter of seconds

    • @theira9663
      @theira9663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      @@DiegoDiaz-vm9xx yeah that part wasn't supposed to happen

    • @limes194
      @limes194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      How did this help the Poles?

    • @makky6239
      @makky6239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +178

      @@limes194 Who said it was about the poles?

    • @theira9663
      @theira9663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      @@makky6239 well poles are good for holding up a Soviet flag and after the war a lot of poles could be made

  • @gonyx4
    @gonyx4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    UK betraying his allies whenever its good for them is almost as classic as Italy changing sides.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell the 300,000 Polish ex-service personnel who were granted UK citizenship in 1946 after the theft of their Polish hmoelands by communism.

    • @gonyx4
      @gonyx4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 You mean after refusing helping them on a war they promised to help? Cool

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gonyx4 Where do you get the idea that "help was refused", when the fact is Britain was UNABLE to help at such short notice? Do you naively believe that countries maintain ruinously expensive standing armies, ready at a moment's notice to spring into action anywhere in the world?
      Britain and France reacted as quickly as they could to mobilise their armies to the surprise assault on Poland on 1st Sept 1939.
      The British Royal Navy IMMEDIATELY instigated the "North sea blockade" that had effectively strangled Germany out of WW1.
      The RAF did not have the range to attack nazi forces in Poland and refused to bomb the German mainland as they did not want to spread the war but contain Germany. Though they did IMMEDIATELY attack German naval units at sea.
      The British army IMMEDIATELY initiated the transfer of its regular army units to France as the BEF (British Expeditionary Force). By Dec 1939 it had just 3 full strength divisions ready in France. It took till April 1940 for us to assemble 10 full divisions and 3 reserve divisions on the borders of Belgium. Poland had collapsed after 5 weeks. What exactly do you think those 10 British divisions in April 1940 would be able to do against the +140 Wehrmacht divisions then stationed on the western front?
      The French army, which was by far the largest of the two nations (and indeed in Europe), bungled its own incompetent mobilisation. It conscripted so many of its population that it temporarily crippled its own economy, and had to release countless thousands of soldiers to man her factories again.
      You seem ignorant of the fact that if it hadn't been for the British & French declaration of war in 1939, regardless of their inability to give meaningful support to Poland in its "hour of need", or if the UK had surrendered in june 1940 after the collapse of France (as the ENTIRE world expected us to) then Poland would have remained under nazi domination for DECADES. Remember that apart from Britain and France (who between them collectively squandered 1.1 million of their own citizen's lives, bankrupted themselves as nations, and ended up losing their empires) absolutely NO ONE ELSE in the so called "international community" raised a finger or cared whether Poland existed or not in 1939.
      Without the continued opposition of the British empire to nazism from June 1940 onwards, opposition which bankrupted the UK and cost her 460,000 of her citizen's lives, there would have been:
      NO D-Day and war in the Meditteranean to draw sizeable wehrmacht resources from the war on the Eastern Front.
      NO strategic bombing of German cities and war industries.
      NO interdiction of German global sea trade by the Royal Navy.
      NO massive supply of weapons and war materiel from the west to the USSR, once their former allies nazi Germany had turned on them.
      NO utterly crucial strategic intelligence courtesy of Britain's (not Poland's before you say it) "ULTRA" program.
      With the result that the USSR would have collapsed somewhere in 1942/43, leaving the nazis in control of the whole of Europe, and their extermination camps still operating on Polish soil into the 1950s, 60s, or even 70s.

  • @markusskram4181
    @markusskram4181 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @jovanpopovic5195
    @jovanpopovic5195 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1556

    For a second, I read that as why didn't aliens declare war on ussr.

    • @stunner9005
      @stunner9005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +149

      Same, that would have been a fun video.

    • @TheOwlofAthens
      @TheOwlofAthens 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      This isn't the Worldwar Series

    • @jesseberg3271
      @jesseberg3271 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      I have dyslexia and I often have little fun things like that. I once read a scifi book that dealt with the genetic slave trade, which I misread as the _geriatric_ slave trade, an economic model I still struggle to conceptualize to this day.

    • @MalleusSemperVictor
      @MalleusSemperVictor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I think I played a video game about this once.

    • @timothymclean
      @timothymclean 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Why would they? The Soviets would probably be the aliens' best customers, if they were diplomatically inclined; they had some of the biggest reserves of raw resources (human and otherwise), but relatively little industry.

  • @johnperez4166
    @johnperez4166 4 ปีที่แล้ว +491

    Soviet Union: helps invade Poland Allies: I’ve never met this man in my life

    • @WeatherManToBe
      @WeatherManToBe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He could be walking down the street and I wouldn't know who this man is

    • @ShinigamiInuyasha777
      @ShinigamiInuyasha777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@Abdul54cp i've always found hilariusly dark how the URSS will lose every offensiver war they went and win every defensive war they got.

    • @friedrichii.aliasdergroe9233
      @friedrichii.aliasdergroe9233 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Abdul54cp And its also the area russia took from poland in the partitions of poland 1772-1795,so poland just "took it back" in 1921
      You can play this game endlessly

    • @swampdonkey1567
      @swampdonkey1567 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gleb B. / Глеб Б. The Soviets took Ukraine so the poles took the parts of Ukraine they captured after pushing the Soviets out. Much of which was actually technically diplomatically given to Poland after the the border war and Soviets invaded in return for help against to Soviets which they did. The poles helped liberate the capital and as part of the agreement went back to defend there own country.

    • @maxim6088
      @maxim6088 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well...tbh, there was nothing they could do about it, Russia was just to far away, and to get to it, they would have to go through Germany, which they couldn't, as Germany would win the war if they wouldn't have had to worry about the USSR (70-80% of the German forces were stationed at the Eastern front on average during the war, and 9/10 German casualties were suffered on that very same front during the war against the Soviets), and could have had focused all of their military might on the Western front!

  • @GoodVideos4
    @GoodVideos4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Right at the end he says "Also, they would have lost'.

  • @eddiesanchez551
    @eddiesanchez551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +724

    The " Your Mother " sign should not have made me laugh as hard as it did

  • @sammybeaver9130
    @sammybeaver9130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1059

    2:38
    Poland 1919-1939
    'This was like the fourth time'
    Lol 🤣

    • @ronmaximilian6953
      @ronmaximilian6953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Poland is now part of nato, and I'm SURE that everyone will go to war to protect Poland and the Baltic republics this time.

    • @DrPacman
      @DrPacman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      @@ronmaximilian6953 better not to rely on that fact

    • @ronmaximilian6953
      @ronmaximilian6953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@DrPacman I was being sarcastic

    • @DrPacman
      @DrPacman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@ronmaximilian6953 yeah I know

    • @nogisonoko5409
      @nogisonoko5409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Every nation want to partition Poland.

  • @snowman2970
    @snowman2970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It has been long thought that General Sikorski the Polish Prime Minister in exile had an agreement with Churchill that the Allies would retake Poland from the Russians. However Churchill reneged on the deal and had General Sikorski assassinated.

    • @1ochotnik
      @1ochotnik 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know Sikorski's plane crash is VERY suspicious, but is there any proof of link to Churchill or bri'ish government found yet?

  • @carl4243
    @carl4243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why is youtube recommending me this right now.

  • @dans_11
    @dans_11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +585

    Poland: Is conquered by two strongest nations in the world
    Allies: Attacking 3 km into Germany

    • @makeromaniagreatagain9697
      @makeromaniagreatagain9697 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      People: why didn't the allies invade the Ruhr area in 1939?
      Me: Hindenburg line with thousands of bunkers, trenches, barbed wire and land mines.

    • @Blunt_Raz0r
      @Blunt_Raz0r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@makeromaniagreatagain9697 isnt hindenburg line ww1 thing?

    • @sandrosaladze8095
      @sandrosaladze8095 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@makeromaniagreatagain9697 it would've been better of they did invade, isn't it better to wage war on enemy soil rather than your own? France saw what happened to their country in WW1 and plus they had twice as many divisions, Britain and France had more manpower and rescources to draw on, while yes Germany did have the support from USSR, but it was a matter of time before they would invade a weakend Germany, exhausted by the war with the Allies.

    • @unknowndane4754
      @unknowndane4754 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@sandrosaladze8095 I think it's mainly two points 1. Both wanted to end it diplomatically instead of a great war again (hindsight is 20/20) and 2. Both weren't really prepared for a large war.

    • @larsonpartisan2855
      @larsonpartisan2855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      But why should they have died for Danzig? What did the Poles offer in return? You act like Poland , a nation that hasnt existed for hundreds of years ( without france or britain caring about it ) was suddenly worth millions of french and british lives. You know what they also could have done? NOT declaring war on Germany in 39 and just let germany and the ussr restore the old european borders. The Poles should be grateful , but all i ever see are bitchin poles asking why the french and british soldiers didnt wanna die for them.

  • @Ponko_93
    @Ponko_93 4 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    Well looks like they didn't polish the agreement terms.

  • @keiranbrabbs5064
    @keiranbrabbs5064 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your show

  • @bobgeorge6751
    @bobgeorge6751 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I kept waiting for the line "France and the UK thought the USSR and Germany would inevitably start to fight each other but fun fact... yes"

    • @user-kw5hx7ji8h
      @user-kw5hx7ji8h 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dirty politics. Churchill wanted war wit Germany. Lied to his people.

  • @andrewklang809
    @andrewklang809 4 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    0:55: The French MILITARY was conducting its own secret diplomacy? God, the Third Republic was screwed up....

    • @navilluscire2567
      @navilluscire2567 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

      As previously stated in past videos, *French politics* at the time could be summed up as *"...a dumpster fire."*

    • @girlgarde
      @girlgarde 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Yeah, even if France HADN'T fallen in 1940 and knocked out Hitler early on, the Third Republic still would've fallen and gotten replaced by a hopefully more effective government.

    • @marcus4046
      @marcus4046 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@navilluscire2567 I would call it really the 1st *Nuked Politics* but i remember that the Byzantines and the Romans were a thing so yeah its politics were fucky.

    • @Croz89
      @Croz89 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@navilluscire2567 So much so there were genuine fears of a civil war after France was liberated. It was one reason why the British weren't keen on helping the French resistance too much, they were worried arms given to French militias to defeat the Nazis would be used to kill other French people after they had gone.

    • @littlelizard351
      @littlelizard351 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Andrew Klang it’s called the Third Reich not the third republic

  • @cannonball666
    @cannonball666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +513

    Poland: "Ummm. We are being taken over by the Soviets. Can we get a little help, please?"
    Allies: "How do you define "taken over?" Give us a half century to contemplate the meaning"

  • @swaggerog7284
    @swaggerog7284 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gotta love the long game

  • @peterb7186
    @peterb7186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    It was a very smart strategy from Britain in France.
    It's not widely known, that in 1937-39 Poland was very close to joining the Axis. They had some common interest, as Poland was interested to re-take some lands taken by Czechoslovakia in 1920 and searched for support in defending itself against the USRR, which was considered by Poland to be the greatest threat. In 1937 USRR executed over 100 000 polish citizens that lived within its borders and the last war ended just 18 years earlier in 1921. Hitler tried to convince Poland to join him and from his perspective, asking only for Danzig was a very modest proposal (his fanatics wanted to regain all of western Poland, Hitler seemed like a moderate next to them). Poland however had a very honorable (and somewhat dumb) government that had quite unrealistic opinion on it's own military capabilities. Morale was sky high especially since Poland the last war with USSR. Still, many factions within the polish parliament considered siding with Germans.
    This is when UK and France step in and give Poland an additional morale boost: They guarantee Polish independence. With that promise and having WW1 in mind, Poland decided that it's safe to refuse Hitler and fight. The result was Poland losing 25% of it's population and 50% of its pre-war territory, along with total destruction of its industry, agriculture and cultural heritage.
    UK and France gained a year and then got what they counted on - the German invasion of USSR.

    • @capitalism420
      @capitalism420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Poland having an unrealistic opinion of its own military? That could never be.

    • @303Pinker
      @303Pinker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Poland never was close to join axis. Actually was always identifying Nazie Germans as mortal threat. That's why Proposed France and UK war against Hitler in 1933. At that time Poland could win alone but there was no approval. Later history shoved ho had right.

    • @maxalbon9557
      @maxalbon9557 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is the biggest bullshit i ever saw on youtube...

  • @brandonlyon730
    @brandonlyon730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +491

    I don’t see how they would be even able to fight both super powers at the same time without collapsing on themselves. I mean France didn’t even survive a whole year against Germany, it would’ve been suicide to attack both at the same time

    • @Daniel-kq4bx
      @Daniel-kq4bx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      At that point nobody could have expected that but if you have more then 2 Braincells, you might come to the conclusion that having Germany, Italy (Allied to Japan) and the Soviet Union against you might be an unwinnable war

    • @davidlubkowski7175
      @davidlubkowski7175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Poland still fought on tho

    • @BraceletGrolf
      @BraceletGrolf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      Seeing the USSR as a "superpower" is an anachronism and was very much not the case back then, it was seen as a backwater state with no real power. The real reason to not declare war was : Why ? Like seriously, why declare war on a country with which you have no fronts against...

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Britain and France planned to help Finland against the Soviet Union, by asking to move troops through neutral Norway and Sweden, and also backstabbing Sweden and taking the country over while doing so. No surprise Sweden and Norway refused.

    • @vermicelledecheval5219
      @vermicelledecheval5219 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@markhenley3097 Never heard something like this... Do you have any sources ?

  • @m136dalie
    @m136dalie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    Love Poland's tombstone at 2:38
    One of those countries that never catches a break

    • @juniorcrusher2245
      @juniorcrusher2245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Alenas Kvasninas didn't ally

    • @krzysztofmichniewicz6247
      @krzysztofmichniewicz6247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Alenas Kvasninas You should know, that Poland wasn't ally of Hitler in 1938, Poland also didnt split Czechoslovakia in half when they were at the middle of bloody defence of their own country. Whatever Poland retook lands, wich were guaranted to her in Versaille and wich Czechoslovakia took by invasion in 1920.
      This is very bad example of Poland as a bad neighbor to others, especially that Czechoslovakia has been sold by whole western in 1935, and did nothing in their defence in 1937/8 when Germany took most, most of their country.
      Much better example wich is unjustified blame of Polish government was 1922 and Żeligowski action for wich Polish government never said sorry, and as many dumb polish nationalist don't see a reason for sorry.
      Whatever it is still not justification to Soviet Union to pull knife into polish back, annex 3 baltic states and stay as well in Poland and those countries for the next 50 years. And later attack on Finland.
      It was an agressor, not the first time, and hope Im totally wrong, but still is.

    • @Tmb1112
      @Tmb1112 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But never gonna happen again. 🇺🇸🤜🏼🤛🏻🇵🇱

    • @davidm4677
      @davidm4677 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Tmb1112 lol

  • @deeppurple883
    @deeppurple883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    These and other similar questions I also had. I found out how intricate and complex they are. They are a minefield that keeps changing and very hard to nail down . Wording is everything. It always bothered me watching other countries stand by while a small a countty was attacked. Until I was educated on the mindfields associated with Treaties, all kinds. Knowing about how they work makes reading about war's, conflicts and peace treaties basically, all Treaties better understood and enjoyed. I'm still learning never done. History is our PPF, past, present and future. The most important message from history is, if not examined, domed to repeat it. ✊☘️

    • @aceclash
      @aceclash ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s why Hitler wanting peace with Britain was doomed to fail. It’s like asking snake to not change colour. Britain would have to change their approach entirely.
      Germany was strong hard on power but an amateur compared to Britain in divide and rule tactic.

    • @blahblah6227
      @blahblah6227 ปีที่แล้ว

      England and france would of got smashed by Germany and Russia

  • @williampierce2034
    @williampierce2034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good vid.

  • @franrobert80
    @franrobert80 4 ปีที่แล้ว +344

    Germany invades Poland
    Allies: now this is an Avengers level threat
    USSR invades Poland
    Allies: you werent supposed to do that

    • @weik-2936
      @weik-2936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      bad USSR! That's a bad USSR!

    • @MrStolboy
      @MrStolboy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Stalin offered an anti facist coalition and both france and briitian refused

    • @SimonAshworthWood
      @SimonAshworthWood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The USSR only took back land stolen from them by Poland a few years before.

    • @kingt0295
      @kingt0295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Reddit has ruined TH-cam comments.

    • @zenon4383
      @zenon4383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@SimonAshworthWood this is pure bullshit

  • @apacheattackhelicopter8410
    @apacheattackhelicopter8410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +889

    What the polish flag means,
    Red: blood givin for the country
    White: freedom
    Blue: truthful allies

    • @user-yk2xb1ti2w
      @user-yk2xb1ti2w 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      How to fix Polish flag ? Easy, you need to add blue duct tape between white and red =)

    • @felipeaugusto2600
      @felipeaugusto2600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@user-yk2xb1ti2w Then it would be a lie.

    • @user-ec1xh9ex5n
      @user-ec1xh9ex5n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@user-yk2xb1ti2w now I know how to destroy Russia. Simply tear off the blue duct tape. Thank you.

    • @riskdubz8538
      @riskdubz8538 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao no

    • @bondrewdthelordofdawn3744
      @bondrewdthelordofdawn3744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That dutch flag

  • @baileyryan488
    @baileyryan488 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this history lesson

  • @szumgejzer1339
    @szumgejzer1339 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    02:38 i dont know if it is a clear paraphrase of the first lines from polish national anthem (that is "poland is not yet lost") but if yes, you do a really good job not only in research, but also in writing a script to these videos

  • @luchshiy_v_ADU
    @luchshiy_v_ADU 4 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    Germany: **invades to Poland**
    Allies: War time!
    Soviet Union: Suprise *suka* ! - *said it and invades in East Poland*
    Allies: Not war time.

    • @seneca983
      @seneca983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      "War time!"
      Phony war time!

    • @GewalfofWivia
      @GewalfofWivia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, was it Poland or Germany territory they invaded at that point?

    • @dnocturn84
      @dnocturn84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GewalfofWivia It was Poland territory at that point in time.

    • @MFahrulRozi
      @MFahrulRozi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dude
      Suka means Like in Indonesian
      I just learned that in 2003

    • @JohnDoe-zb5mt
      @JohnDoe-zb5mt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dnocturn84 Poland didn't have a government and millitary, so no.

  • @scl1332
    @scl1332 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1062

    Basically France and Britain
    “Some of u will die, so we can be partners with the Soviets”
    “But that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to take”
    Edit: Guys it was just a joke if you do watch the video it does mention how Poland was left out to die and due to this fact it made it easier for the Soviet Union to do its thing
    Edit 2: somehow the joke about leaving Poland to die with a Shrek reference has gone into how Britain and France committed atrocities before the war and Napoleon’s strength in his time period god I love the internet

    • @Apodeipnon
      @Apodeipnon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Well, no, more would have died had they declared war.

    • @tanmayjain5385
      @tanmayjain5385 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That's completely the wrong way

    • @erenemre9461
      @erenemre9461 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      France and Britain didn´t have the manpower to fight Germany and the Soviet Union at the same time. They had no other choice and in hindsight we can see that their theory was right.
      Edit: Germany and Napoleon couldn´t defeat Russia. How should the Allies beat both at the same time?

    • @scapegoht9537
      @scapegoht9537 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Lol the Soviet Union tried throughout the 30’s to make an anti-Nazi pact with the West but they refused

    • @gaiustheant1618
      @gaiustheant1618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "He huffed and he puffed and he signed the eviction notice"

  • @robertbowe2672
    @robertbowe2672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It would be interesting to know how (the wording of public statements) the UK and French Governments explained this obvious double standard to their peoples. Or was the fact of the USSR invasion of Poland kept secret by both Governments whilst they screamed blue murder about the German invasion?

    • @Phoenix-ov5gg
      @Phoenix-ov5gg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one denied it, but the UK had no binding agreements to protect Poland from the USSR so it's not really double standards just politics. That being said I'm sure the allies would have reacted if they hadn't just fcked up their entire country and economies, lost millions of citizens, and anyone had any stomach left for war.

    • @cannibalbunnygirl
      @cannibalbunnygirl ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, the last part. I never heard any of this until I worked with Polish people in the mid 2000s. I then realised the UK doesn't talk about Russia, at all, ever.
      It's like we pretend they don't exist

    • @belbrighton6479
      @belbrighton6479 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There were debates in the UK press and parliament at the time in a limited way. Churchill was very sorry after the war for the betrayal.

  • @Antraeon
    @Antraeon ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:12 ... Yeah, I bet it played out exactly that way for them over the next few months, too.

  • @Feffdc
    @Feffdc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +299

    "Strongly worded letter"
    Dearest Joseph Stalin
    That wasnt very nice of you
    Best wishes Neville
    *Savage*

    • @spicyleaves8876
      @spicyleaves8876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Someone ripped off your comment and got 400 likes :/

    • @zealousdoggo
      @zealousdoggo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Words cannot express how truly obliterated on the inside I feel -Stalin probably lol

    • @leonleon2021
      @leonleon2021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@spicyleaves8876 even the copied comment was copied.

  • @adeptkhristossilvae2601
    @adeptkhristossilvae2601 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    "We are going to send you a very angry letter telling you how angry we are"

  • @RevolutionaryRealm
    @RevolutionaryRealm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oversimplified is written all over this video. Great work. A new generation.

  • @winestu5322
    @winestu5322 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A wise man once said "One enemy at a time."

  • @MrSoty12345
    @MrSoty12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    "Also, they would have lost" My exact thoughts 😅😅

    • @kainuu3157
      @kainuu3157 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Uproar01 USSR won decisively.

    • @ForeverShadowBanned
      @ForeverShadowBanned 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kainuu3157 Stalingrad begs to differ.

    • @spacemanjoe7074
      @spacemanjoe7074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Uproar01 watch til the very end of the video homie.

    • @ecksdee1637
      @ecksdee1637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @i get it THEY WOULD'VE LOST EITHER WAY, THERE IS PROOF, GERMANY WAS NOT GOING TO WIN, WITH OR WITHOUT SNOW, THE RUSSIAN LAND IS SIMPLY TOO BIG TO CONQUER.

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No, they wouldn’t have
      Not when the Americans got involved

  • @CliffCardi
    @CliffCardi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    Poland: "Let me tell you a story about bad neighbors."

    • @CliffCardi
      @CliffCardi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alenas Kvasninas say what?

    • @diurpaneustv2166
      @diurpaneustv2166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Alenas Kvasninas poland got a tiny piece of czechoslovakia, where poles were (and still are) majority. It wasn't agreed with germany or sth, they just took it anyway. Czechoslovakia was gone either way.

    • @dakkossman2063
      @dakkossman2063 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So what? It wasn't spring good or bad. It was about strong and weak

    • @boydar1msc887
      @boydar1msc887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@diurpaneustv2166 Yes thats True, but you forget to say that few years before this happend with "Zaolzie" Czechoslovakia cheated the poles and took this piece when Poland was fighting aganist soviet russia and save all Europe from communism
      So, when poles have a chance they Just took what was stold from them
      Thats how it was

  • @h.p.lovecraft7286
    @h.p.lovecraft7286 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Because they were serving the same masters.

    • @the1stman817
      @the1stman817 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The big nosed masters

    • @Snaxolotl71
      @Snaxolotl71 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Room temp IQ

  • @alexaurum913
    @alexaurum913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Poland: * starts existing again *
    Its neighbours: *How about no*

    • @aAverageFan
      @aAverageFan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Poland was also not very nice to its neighbours just look what they did to Czechoslovakia in 1938

  • @LONGshot-tf8cf
    @LONGshot-tf8cf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +553

    USSR: Violates Poland
    Allies: That wasn’t very nice

    • @Imperium83
      @Imperium83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Poland, Lithuania, Finland, Latvia, Estonia*
      Meanwhile Britain and France's imperial empires control a third of the globe.
      But Germany wanting Danzig back was just too much.

    • @myguy6762
      @myguy6762 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Steve in essence you’re right. However, this was a case of German crazy hostility within Europe. If a power was raging war in say Africa(Ethiopia and Italy) those powers wouldn’t care at all.

    • @Imperium83
      @Imperium83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      >wanting your land back
      >"crazy hostility"
      Okay.

    • @myguy6762
      @myguy6762 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Steve uhuh uhuh
      >invading Austria
      >invading Czechoslovakia
      >being a literal dictator who’s planning on killing jews

    • @xdcarno
      @xdcarno 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Imperium83 you mean being a sore loser

  • @senorhiller5914
    @senorhiller5914 4 ปีที่แล้ว +341

    You forgot one important thing: the allies did not declare war on ussr as it was not as much of a rival to Britain and France. The treaty between UK and Poland shows that it was only about eliminating germany as a rival and not about Polands security.

    • @makeromaniagreatagain9697
      @makeromaniagreatagain9697 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Well, the USSR was a country with an ideology hostile to the west. They also slowly expanded into Eastern Europe and send supplies and equipment to Mao in China in an atempt to support communist revolutionaries. I believe the allies had every reason to hate the USSR.

    • @lolbots
      @lolbots 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nazi much?

    • @1.99happymealwithfries7
      @1.99happymealwithfries7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@makeromaniagreatagain9697 The Entente (The Allies) already invaded Russia to fight the Bolsheviks in the 1920's and failed to stop them from coming to power, once the USSR was stopped by Poland it ceased to really be a major threat to British or French interests in Europe. Once Stalin consolidated power, the Soviet Union also became less aggressive for the time being.
      Nazi Germany was, correctly, gauged to be a far more immediate threat to both French and British interests in Europe.

    • @franciscor.m.8003
      @franciscor.m.8003 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Poland was just an excuse, its not like France and Britain care about any thing but themselves, although thats understandable

    • @makeromaniagreatagain9697
      @makeromaniagreatagain9697 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@franciscor.m.8003 well, they could have declared war on Germany when Germany re-armed, re-militarized the Rhineland, demanded Czechislovakia or when they occupied Czechia and made Slovakia a puppet state.

  • @bookashkin
    @bookashkin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Impressive. An episode about Entente's involvement in the demarcation of borders between the Soviets and Poland that doesn't mention the Curzon line :s

  • @michaelfetter4541
    @michaelfetter4541 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bit at the end cracked me up. "plus, they would've lost". The real reason.

  • @luisguilhermefernandes7144
    @luisguilhermefernandes7144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    I lost everything on "This is like the fourth time" on Poland's gravestone LMAAAOO

  • @cerjmedia
    @cerjmedia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    I love that nice little piece at the very end
    "Also, they would have lost"
    Fair play HM, fair play

  • @jeanvonestling7408
    @jeanvonestling7408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Props for showing the Polish military cap with its distinct point element.

  • @Ivan-gu9xm
    @Ivan-gu9xm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What about a fact that these territories have been taken from USSR 15 years yearlier?

    • @aAverageFan
      @aAverageFan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Today those territories are part of Ukraine and Belarus

  • @AFGuidesHD
    @AFGuidesHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +337

    1:24 they didn't have to declare war on germany either.

    • @piggysew797
      @piggysew797 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      They didn't have to, but allowing a tyrannical megalomaniac run around and do what he wants destroying the balance of power is not going to end well. Love your vids btw

    • @AFGuidesHD
      @AFGuidesHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      @@piggysew797 yet they were perfectly fine with destroying europe and giving the power to russia and america?

    • @bernhardt1557
      @bernhardt1557 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@piggysew797 ...u talking about stalin?

    • @wallachia4797
      @wallachia4797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      The Soviet Union and Stalin killed more people than the big bad moustache man could've ever hoped to.

    • @filiplofgren8023
      @filiplofgren8023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@wallachia4797 or had the intention to

  • @AdmiralBonetoPick
    @AdmiralBonetoPick 3 ปีที่แล้ว +834

    Also, declaring war on a second massively powerful country when you're already engaged in a life-or-death struggle with the first one would be idiotic. Although in fairness, Japan somehow failed to realise this when, after a decade of attrition war against China they decided "Maybe declaring war on the USA will improve our chances of victory."

    • @elseggs6504
      @elseggs6504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Previously pissing the Soviets AND Mongols off, definetly didnt help their situation. Its also worth noting that the Pacific was and still is quite a goldmine. So its not like Japan had no reason to go there. China fought them to a standstill, the Russians crushed them before and the only way they could expand is by kicking out Colonial Powers like the Netherlands or France, which were all busy thanks to Germany

    • @mdaniel5384
      @mdaniel5384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@elseggs6504 It is the other way around, Japan crushed Russia before.

    • @elseggs6504
      @elseggs6504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      @@mdaniel5384 Japan crushed Russia so hard at Kalkhin Gol that they retreated, signed a non-aggression pact and didnt bother taking their pacific coastline.
      Edit: in case you're too dense, its sarcasm

    • @mdaniel5384
      @mdaniel5384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@elseggs6504 I was talking about the Russo-Japanese war, not about a border conflict.
      I looked at the numbers involved in the conflict you mentioned and the casualties. That is supposed to be a crushing win by the Soviets?

    • @elseggs6504
      @elseggs6504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      @@mdaniel5384 It scared Japan enough to shift their focus towards the Pacific instead of helping Germany out.

  • @rexpopuli4833
    @rexpopuli4833 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This all sounds very familiar. Almost like we are watching history repeat itself once again.

  • @hardchooligan
    @hardchooligan ปีที่แล้ว

    The post credits line cracked me up

  • @mirzaahmed6589
    @mirzaahmed6589 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    "That's like, the fourth time."

    • @mjm3091
      @mjm3091 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Which is great and awful joke reference at the same time.

    • @pachacutiincayupanqui2239
      @pachacutiincayupanqui2239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's 5 time . 4 was after the Napoleonic Wars where Russia , Prussia and Austria divided Duchy of Warsaw

    • @tomaszskowronski1406
      @tomaszskowronski1406 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pachacutiincayupanqui2239 6 times the charm. Becasue obviously its going to happen. As sun rises after the night, so does Poland get invaded, that is the rule of nature. There's been 273 separate wars in Poland's history. At least, i probably missed some.

    • @s0li
      @s0li 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pachacutiincayupanqui2239 let's say 4th. Duchy of Warsaw wasn't really independent

  • @Frank-jy1lz
    @Frank-jy1lz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Legit every time I see this guy upload I get gassed, legit only thing I enjoy watching during lockdown, keep it up ❤️

    • @Frank-jy1lz
      @Frank-jy1lz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No pun intended 👀😂

    • @qfox16789
      @qfox16789 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Legit?

    • @igorparzyjagla4346
      @igorparzyjagla4346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try Sam O'Nella academy. Guy makes hilarious videos about various, generally history-related things.

  • @fatherstalin9008
    @fatherstalin9008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Britain pushed forward with the harshest measures known, a strongly worded letter.
    Me: this sounds oddly similar to something

  • @macsenplays
    @macsenplays 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:49 History Matters is at its best when one side is holding a sign saying "Your mother" toward the other.

  • @xxthemasterx3407
    @xxthemasterx3407 4 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    Britain and France - sacificing allies for their own interest since 1938

    • @UM96lol
      @UM96lol 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Feels Czech/Polish/Yugoslavian/Romanian man

    • @PANZERFAUST90
      @PANZERFAUST90 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Did you not watch the video? lol

    • @bernardyoung7014
      @bernardyoung7014 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@UM96lol well Romania was not even invaded and the british was busy helping Greece to help Yugoslavia especially with multiple countries invading it

    • @bartek4321
      @bartek4321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @Tattle Boad you missed the point - the point being is that western allies lost the first half of the war exactly because they tried to be those 'intelligent, cold and calculated' opportunists, who did not even use their allies, they let them fall and go for not even a gain for the allies themselves

    • @ithadtobeaname7327
      @ithadtobeaname7327 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be fair, The Yugoslavs were planning on helping the axis until they decided to have a civil war

  • @axolot9097
    @axolot9097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    2:38 "This is like the fourth time" killed me

    • @mjm3091
      @mjm3091 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's really grotesque when you actually consider the real history behind that joke

    • @axolot9097
      @axolot9097 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mjm3091 Yes History was harsh with Poland (and by history I mean it's neighbors)

    • @Zorro9129
      @Zorro9129 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Suffering Poland

  • @eric-wb7gj
    @eric-wb7gj 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    TY 🙏

  • @libaedunto4875
    @libaedunto4875 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have ascended to reading captions with History Matters voice level

  • @craig5322
    @craig5322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    "Also they'd have lost" lmao true

    • @Jamo_7811
      @Jamo_7811 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You found that too, huh

    • @donaldmiller8629
      @donaldmiller8629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @ Craig Noneman ,
      I don't think so . The Russians were stubborn fighters , that's true. But remember , the only reason that they were able to fight the Germans was because the U.S, was supplying Russia with military equipment. The Russians were not able to manufacture it themselves.

    • @andrewlorenzo6611
      @andrewlorenzo6611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@donaldmiller8629 meh, late into war soviet manpower would overwhelm france and britain

    • @donaldmiller8629
      @donaldmiller8629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@andrewlorenzo6611 ,
      Without U.S. supplies that would not happen. Just ask the Hungarians what happened when they tried to fight the Russian tanks with pitchforks and garden hoes. It means , you lose !

    • @andrewlorenzo6611
      @andrewlorenzo6611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@donaldmiller8629 well you also kinda have to remember that hungary is relevantly smaller than Germany, soviet union, uk etc

  • @jesseberg3271
    @jesseberg3271 4 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    I'd like to know, to what degree were they really at peace with the USSR to begin with?
    This is something I'm not sure about, but I know that Brittan, France and the United States all sent forces to attack the Soviet Union as soon as it came into existence, and afterwards, treated it largely as a pariah state. Did the Western Allies even have full diplomatic ties to severe, with Moscow, in 1939?

    • @craftworded
      @craftworded 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      If i am not mistaken the Allies refused to recognize the USSR until the 1930's

    • @thenintenbro7154
      @thenintenbro7154 4 ปีที่แล้ว +97

      Stalin had tried and failed to create an anti-fascist pact with Britain prior to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, but they Allies would do very under-the-table trade with the newly heavily industrialized Soviet Union. Prior to WWII, Soviets also had a rather large population so no relatioms would've been stupid, but the everyday people(especially the British people) could never know this, as communism exists to topple existing power structures(especially Monarchies). So yes, but they weren't friends and Russia couldn't try to be.

    • @para_magnus2200
      @para_magnus2200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Strix no we (the British) recognised them in 1924

    • @alvaroayalafernandez560
      @alvaroayalafernandez560 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      They saw the USSR as both a threat and an asset. Ideologically, the USSR was their greatest enemy, but militarily Russia/USSR could keep Germany in check.

    • @nicolashowellvergara2748
      @nicolashowellvergara2748 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The anti fascit pact contained similarities of the molotove ribbentrop pact like control of the baltics and poland although they were not clearly defined

  • @bywalecmask9640
    @bywalecmask9640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We need to remember, when first time our "allies" chickened out, exactly in 1932, when Marshal Józef Piłsudski was ready to intervention in Germany to overthrow Hitler on that time German army was much weaker than polish. Polish army was ready to attack but guess what France disagreed, antyhing what happend after 1939 was fault of our allies, we Poles owe nothing to France or Great Britain, which sold us to the Soviets for 44 years. Our war ended after we overthrew from the occupant of Russia.

    • @aAverageFan
      @aAverageFan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      France also refused to help Czechoslovakia despite signing a defence agreement with them.

  • @BrownFoxWarrior
    @BrownFoxWarrior ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make."

  • @59master60
    @59master60 4 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    The reason why the allies didn’t declare war on the USSR was simple...
    No one declares wars anymore as you explained in a previous video.

    • @ernstschmidt4725
      @ernstschmidt4725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      that's a tad later, when UN became a thing

    • @59master60
      @59master60 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I know I was just joking

    • @j.h1529
      @j.h1529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Noise

  • @project22-ab88
    @project22-ab88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Poland: Nooo you cant just leave me to die like this!
    Britain and France: Haha Poland go by by

    • @bernardyoung7014
      @bernardyoung7014 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really as the polish government went to the uk anyway

    • @project22-ab88
      @project22-ab88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@bernardyoung7014
      Yea but did they really give a shit about the Poles? No. They demonstrated this clearly during the Warsaw uprising and during the negotiations.

    • @mann536
      @mann536 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@project22-ab88 what do you think uk and france supposed to do, poland is km away from britain.

    • @prophetofregret8468
      @prophetofregret8468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mann536 Poles didn't have that problem at Monte Casino and in Berlin and in a couple of other places...

    • @project22-ab88
      @project22-ab88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mann536
      Yet at the time the UK had the best Navy in the world. They had enough power to reach Norway, but not Poland?

  • @gfan83
    @gfan83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And why they didn't declare war when Poland participated in dividing of Czechoslovakia in 1938? )

    • @d.k8257
      @d.k8257 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it was Polish territory, and Czechia just allowed it.

    • @gfan83
      @gfan83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@d.k8257 USSR also took their own territory from Poland in 1939.

    • @d.k8257
      @d.k8257 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gfan83 Nope, it was never theirs. they also legally handed it over to poland in the 1917 treaty of brest livotsk

    • @gfan83
      @gfan83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@d.k8257 It was territories of Russian Empire wich Poland occupied in 1921.

    • @d.k8257
      @d.k8257 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gfan83 Nope

  • @Iam0ne1
    @Iam0ne1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Britain and France-"Some of you May Die, But it's a Sacrifice I am Willing to Make"

  • @undertalegranie6903
    @undertalegranie6903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    Poland: * Calls for help *
    Germany and USSR: *BUT NOBODY CAME*

    • @shadowsupremeja7352
      @shadowsupremeja7352 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The Polish government: Aight time to exile

    • @undertalegranie6903
      @undertalegranie6903 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Alenas Kvasninas well england and france supported hitler

    • @undertalegranie6903
      @undertalegranie6903 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Alenas Kvasninas btw.
      Poland fights Bolsheviks
      Poland: calls for help
      Czachoslovakia: yoinks Zaolzie
      Hungary: wants to send ammo to Poland
      Czechoslovakia: no u

  • @Frankenbutt99
    @Frankenbutt99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    But why didn’t they declare war on James Bizanet?

    • @juanmola2000
      @juanmola2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      His power is beyond our comprehension.

  • @andyigwe7119
    @andyigwe7119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UK: Dearest Joseph that wasn't nice. Lol!

  • @Geojr815
    @Geojr815 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks James Bizonette

  • @lance8080
    @lance8080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I always thought the allies were hypocrites for declaring war on Nazi Germany and not Communist Russia.

    • @proudsubhuman
      @proudsubhuman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nazi Germany started the war and their ideology was far worse. You think they only did the holocaust? Try that times 20. Read generalpan Ost. Full enslavement, rape, relocation, and genocide of all polish and Russian civilians. The Soviets were no where near as brutal and thank god they won along with the allies. Post-Stalin SU was not perfect, but it was better than the alternative by far.

    • @proudsubhuman
      @proudsubhuman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Let’s not forget that the allies weren’t angels, The US had slaves and still had segregation during WW2. And GB is arguably the largest mass murderer in the history of humanity.

    • @lance8080
      @lance8080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      RusBaller03 .Same atrocities Soviet Russia did. Soviets also help start the Korean War right after WWII they weren’t any better by a long shot.

    • @learningtocrash4030
      @learningtocrash4030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because the same group controls the allies and the Soviets and they want to destroy their enemies, Europeans.

    • @gumdeo
      @gumdeo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Finland as well. It's okay when Soviets invade countries.