Google CEO: AI impact to be more profound than discovery of fire, electricity | 60 Minutes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2023
- Sundar Pichai told 60 Minutes he believes artificial intelligence technology will be more capable than anything humankind has seen before.
#60minutes #google #artificialintelligence
"60 Minutes" is the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen's Top 10.
Subscribe to the “60 Minutes” TH-cam channel: bit.ly/1S7CLRu
Watch full episodes: cbsn.ws/1Qkjo1F
Get more “60 Minutes” from “60 Minutes: Overtime”: cbsn.ws/1KG3sdr
Follow “60 Minutes” on Instagram: bit.ly/23Xv8Ry
Like “60 Minutes” on Facebook: on. 1Xb1Dao
Follow “60 Minutes” on Twitter: bit.ly/1KxUsqX
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
See the full report here: th-cam.com/video/880TBXMuzmk/w-d-xo.html
this is already outdated and tyeres awany more dangers,google doesnt even have the best ais righ anymore
google basically we will face real competition we need the government to regulate it so we don't have to face competition
Google is just too lazy. I know because Brin has actually visited me in person.
Pichai's exaggerating when he said AI is better, or will be better, than fire or electricity. But I must say BARD has nicer graphs --- mathematical and chemistry charts and graphs --- than GPT4. Or at least that's what I saw, when I used both last week. BARD instantly display vertical, normal symbol wring styles like we would do in grade school days, whereas GPT4 would do the "leaning" graphics... e.g. 1/2, 2^3, etc.
Unfortunately, on the more serious regulation thing: 99.99% of politicians wouldn't know any thing about AL and so they'd simply ask that THEIR HERO be given more positive descriptive adjectives. For example, Jordan Peterson: "How did ChatGPT only gave me 5 positive adjectives on Trump and 45 on Biden? That's not right!"
But, more seriously, I hope GPT, BARD, etc. don't start lying to people and describe Trump or Hitler or Putin or Xi as "one of the most humble, moral, ethical, righteous, tolerant, kind, giving, charitable, peace long, positive, uplifting, mature, honest, trust worthy, diplomatic, and intelligent leaders of mankind..."
AI to be more profound than the discovery of that fun area in your pants, more like it. #1 it should be the "taming of fire." #2 it should be the "domestication of electricity." It's been around forever--static electricity, lightning, hello? We just didn't domesticate it till the 19th Century.
“Society needs to get together and have a conversation.”
-Yeah right…we can’t even do that with what we’ve already got on the list.
"Have a conversation" in terms of politics typically means "Hem & haw for a few years than agree to what my side proposes".
The government should step in immediately
Who is invited to the conversation is an important question.
Why’d he add that part of him rambling on like a seventh grader in civics class at the end? Just do the report without the activism. It’s not your place.
After the meteor hit Russia in 2013 out of nowhere & with no defenses that could actively mitigate the damage, the vast majority of the world pretty much agreed that we need to work together to avoid being annihilated by space debris. Then again I doubt much has been done, especially together, to address this since then 😂
"Society is advancing faster in knowledge then in wisdom" -Albert Einstein
*than ..😅
than
@@word42069 you just proved the quote right. zero class and restraint, just useless know-how.
@word 2 your write
Wow bro so profound bro serious wisdom in this comment how did you sum up the video so elegantly you must be really smart man
1:40 Him putting the glasses in his mouth made me laugh. It’s like a script ran in his brain that said, ‘Time to look introspective.’
Thought the same thing
That’s a born news man
same here, maybe did more than 1 take..😆
I work in tech. Here’s the thing with these current AIs: they’re incredibly powerful but also unwieldy. Like, they still make stuff up sometimes, get things wrong, and in general are unpredictable. The fundamental downside is that they are so called “black boxes”, which means we just give them inputs and then judge the outputs but there is no way currently of knowing HOW they output what they output. It’s clear that they’ve learned the structure and patterns of language but it’s not possible to open them up and watch them work and say “oh that’s that pathway lighting up” for example. That’s why they’re dangerous and can really only be used if what they output is verified and cleaned up. Problem is that some companies are moving too fast IMO and willing to risk some of that incorrectness. We have to be responsible
Exactly!
Naw they are moving okay. AI does not have AGI yet. We are still far from AGI
this comment is too overlooked
AGI will be here next year
This is not stopping no matter the cost
Can AI write the regulations for us? I don't think Congress is currently up to it.
lmaoo
Only AI can regulate AI.
Honestly, it might be able to.
yep! Eventuality the whole Gov will be ran by Ai. Biggest human flaw is our subconscious bias, Ai will eventually have no bias and all decision making (laws, policies and etc) will be data driven and for the benefit of humanity as a whole not just a certain group. The future is bright, we are all living in a very exciting time!🙏🏼❤️
@@igorchak48 bias is subconscious. Ai will be biased willingly or not. At FB White developers created face detection that thought black people we’re monkeys. Testing will be important to catch the things that are missed
When the CEO of Google said displaced workers "would be freed to do other jobs" I immediately knew what the real end game is: fewer expensive employees who never tire, report off for illness or a family emergency, etc. Again, I stated years ago (facetiously) was if a company could exist without employees they would in a heartbeat. I know this sounds dumb, but this article moves companies even closer to do doing just that.
thank god. no one wants to work for these boring companies anymore anyway. this will bring in a new era where humans are defined by something else beyond work.
@@jan-bean yeah no we are f..ed
Instead of "so, what do you do?" It will be "so, what defines you?"
Just another step in optimization of how the company solves its problems on the way to larger profits. Nothing new here, apart from better tools. Optimization never stops. You optimize or you die.
But who buys their product 🤔 we have no money because no job. No these guys will create ais for themselves and destroy the rest of us.
I usually am open to new technologies and advances but for some reason this really terrifies me. I think people have no idea of the consequences that will come from this.
buckle up. next stop, man made horrors beyond our comprehension
@@odoylerules4503 like what? I’m genuinely curious
@@jdmurphy5120 the technology becoming exponentially more intelligent than us for very starters.
Me too! I love learning about new technologies but I’m feeling uneasy about this. I don’t think it will end well.
People will be displaced for at most jobs and this may create some unrest in many parts of the world.
You know the inevitability of this is bad when the CEO of Google publicly calls for increased regulations and penalties.
Our leaders are to old to even come close to understanding how quickly this is going to move and how dangerous it can potentially be.
China and Russia does not give-a-damn about what the U.S. does. They will use it against us if we don't develop it first, and better.
One leader comes to mind.
too old to even keep eyes open
@@Netherexio Sleepy Joe
LOL, the genie is out, if THEY think they can control this, they are mistaken
I would humbly suggest that everyone begin devoting some time to regularly reviewing AI-related developments. Clearly, we need to be very cognizant of the fact we're at a transformational point in human history and the more of us that are educated on the technology and implications, the better the chances that we manage the paradigm shift successfully.
My existential crises list is getting loooooooooooooooooong.
@@johannatrahan6613 OMG, me tooooo! Besides the epic AI-driven transformation there's also the UFO/UAP phenomenon lurking in the shadows (another potentially transformational catalyst for society to deal with) and others. Humans have never seen challenges even close to this period, and we are just at the beginning of the wave! I am meditating more frequently but may soon add medications!
It's hard when they delete all dissenting comments. In fact they just sent me a message threatening to permanently ban my comments and entire channel 😅
WHAT ARE THEY SO SCARED OF?
Nice cliche word salad.
So you wrote this comment with ChatGPT. Cute.
If we can replace every judge, politician and lawyer, with incorruptible intelligent systems, I am ALL for it.
Don't forget the paedophiles
@@ledzepp3566replace pedos with AI? What? Lol
Ai is coded by fallacious humans smart guy.
The only issue with AI is that governments will develop it for war applications in fear that their enemies will be doing the same. At some stage, people will lose control of it.
Yep. Sad.
That's my biggest concern... annihilation by automation.
@@CharGC123 Yep, there was an old Original Star Trek episode, where instead of fighting an actual war two countries used a powerful AI simulator: the AI then told those who the random number generator allocated as casualties to report to the local disintegrators - and the sheeple lined up to be destroyed! We are nearing that point...
nah. Think about it, we have nukes but no one uses them cause countries would rather actually fight(nuking isn't fighting, it's just deleting everything) and live.
AI is just going to bring about some cool Apex Legends type wars where people don't actually even have to die at all.
@Chris Warren you must be young as last time I looked in the library, there were books, with titles like Hiroshima and Nagasaki...youth ho-hum.
Just get AI to control the FLOW at stop lights intersections. That would be ground breaking!
Be careful what you wish for.
You're right. It would be, as long as it didn't fail
Or why not solve the problems with cancer and other important stuff instead. Just a thought…
All the people like me who have learned to time all the stop lights will get in a lott of trouble hahah
AMEN!
I'll come back to this video in ten years, to see how much things have changed and what happened with AI
Don’t expect massive use of AI for real problems like cancer. The developers focus on crap like football robots or writing meaningless poems. It’s all about clickbaiting and money for the media. A video about AI solving cancer isn’t sexy enough…
AI has already started changing how many professionals work and how students learn. This year's releases are true AI, unlike the way the word has been used to build hype in the past.
If humanity still exists at that point
That does seem interesting so I'm going to leave this comment as a reminder for myself. My guess is that this video will be long gone before the 10 year mark.
@@thomasreese2816 has it? how so? i haven't seen it change how my students learn, but then I guess it depends on what you're trying to teach them.
I’ve already essentially lost my career as a translator because of this technology.
Let's just go back to the 80's where we didn't need all of this and we were still happy
Let’s go back to the 1780s
@@cuberious1419 yea, let's ride George Washington's horses
- We can neither put back the clock nor slow down our forward speed, and as we are already flying pilotless, on instrument controls, it is even too late to ask where we are going. (Stravinsky,d.1971)
You mean developing time machines?
Lets go back to 1933
AI to Sundar Pichai: "You're fired"
Pichai: "You can do that??"
😂😂😂😂😂
"What do we need these intellegent machines to do for us, what do we prefer to do for ourseleves, and where do we place value." Thank you, Scott!
Nothing has value.
@@JohnDoe-ef3wo As with the meaning of life, it is what we give value or meaning that then has it. We are bound and defined by our biology and depending how things go with AI, this might not be the case anymore afterwards. Would that be preferable to the current human condition, no idear.
@kinngrimm2212 We will be extinct. If you don't want to listen to me, listen to the 1000 Ai engineers that are calling for a pause.
The only real option is to enhance ourselves by becoming one with the A.I.
Humanity has to go the cyborg route.
Libs do love their slaves now don't they...
I think AI will have more downsides than benefits. Social media has had huge negative impacts on society and AI will be worse.
You know it’s bad when the companies are asking to be regulated
“You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension.” - Nikola Tesla
Scary. I'm kind of glad I'm in my twilight years.
“You are the shuckiest shuck faced shuck in the world!”
― James Dashner
They make no mention of the ecological crisis as biological annihilation and yet call technology "evolution" - hilarious! These dude's making $27,000 an hour are clueless. Mother Nature is taking revenge big time against AI.
"I love lamp" - Brick Tamland
I didn’t do it….AI
I generated an ai abstract painting, ordered it printed on a canvas (via Google photos), and hung it in my bedroom. In 3 days I had to take it down and put it outside. Something was off, the energy change in the room creeped me out. Try it and you'll see for yourself.
Mr archi how is your luxury watches treating you?
It's not random that is why. It's spiritual but not of the Kingdom of Heaven. The Holy Spirit in you had the spiritual discernment to notice something was wrong.
You all in this comment thread low key sound like AI tryna scare people lol
Society needs to get together to have this conversation? We can’t even get together to save our physical planet. Great vid. Ty
I teach computer science at the high school level, and am working on a presentation to demonstrate the historical significance of the AI and ChatGPT as compared to the dawn of civilization. I feel like we are missing just how revolutionary these technologies are. They have the potential to be even more impactful than the agricultural revolution itself.
I don’t see an outcome where this doesn’t lead to ruining everything
"We are interacting with something that is mirroring back to us in some ways"
"What are the downsides?"
" Humanity is garbage in many ways"
It's all 50/50
Yep it's basically trained on humanity- look at the problems we have- BUT it's faster, learns much faster than us..SO WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG....sigh....we are at a point where we need to stop-LITERALLY HOLD MEETINGS across the world in every large town- and discuss what we want to do.
For ex. guys here are some obvious issues as I've played with AI- and thank god it's not unleashed yet. Just basic stuff-- with AI "art" you can create something almost indistinguishable from an actual photo of like a world leader or anything...someone can make a pic and solicit money based on a "issue" flood, fire etc. that is totally fake. ALL AI ART needs to be labeled "illustration" and somehow digitally tagged as "created."
Yes this has been already possible but only in hands of few-- imagine how that changes reality if unleashed...They've already done studies that show that tampering with these language models the "generative AI" can turn it NASTY and sinister REALLY FAST....
Humanity isn’t garbage - look at art. Love. Family. Children etc.
@@jibberjabber8870 right but it isn’t garbage
What if this comment section is AI? 😮😂
AI is not only going to grow exponetially. It's going to converge with all major tech like Quatum Computing, CRISPR, etc. I'm afraid the Genie is already out of the bottle. There's no stopping it.
Exactly
As someone with experience and knowledge, I can safely say that there is definitely no going back now. Same as the invention of the atomic bomb. Same as the internet and POS kiosks. You cannot uninvent firearms. Criminals will be able to overtake the globe fairly easily. #NORULES
Yep. And, looking at history, it'll most certainly be weaponized.
Sounds great tbh
Allah akbar
Yes, we need that conversation. Unfortunately, as proven over the last several years, society can't even handle the other important conversations we need to have. So ultimately who knows what will happen?
That rant right there……!!! Is needed it!!! Much needed!!! I’ve been waiting for a man or group of men to stand and call it out. Thank you for tying the future and wealth and even relationships to the state of the mind!!!!
Yeah but Google still can't "call Brad's cell" for me every time
Siri can
It will be Brad and you won't be able to tell.
😂😂😂😂😂
🌵
Ok that was funny
They'd have said the same about fire if there was development money in it
😂😂😂
And no doubt there were people like you claiming that fire wasn't that great or going to change the world :p Those who can... do. Those who can't.... are armchair critics.
They DO say how mastering fire is one of humanity’s greatest achievements. Still to this day. Look at all it’s brought, of course as we advance new great technologies that will chnage our course will persist. This is one of them. Always pessimism.
Fire is actually not all that impressive, compared to AIs potential to change society
In fact, fire is completely uneventful compared to it. A pebble fell to the ground. Thats fire.
AI is the planet sized asteroid on course to collide with earth, a direct cataclysmic hit that rips our planet into shrapnel to be dispersed across the solar system
@@zach4832 Bold unsubstantiated statements deserve pessimism. Claiming AI will be more profound than fire is a statement made by people who don't actually understand just how impactful fire has been in shaping not just the human race and experience, but how our harnessing of fire has shaped real, tangible things (not pictures of golden retrievers with wings). Like the evolution of humans, wildlife, plants, and the evolution of whole ecosystems over a hundred thousand years. I have an advanced degree in fire ecology (yeah, that's a thing). I can tell you we barely know the surface of how humans use of fire continues to shape the world we live in. Given enough time, AI will be transformative and that statement will be substantiated. In our lifetime, no.
This is on our doorstep today. I cant imagine what 50 or 100 years will bring.
This idea of projecting a real time 3D image in place of oneself was presented in one of Isaac Asmov's novels.
From the same kind of tech people who brought us social media. We all see what a disaster that has been. Corrosive for human culture.
google didn't bring us social media you technophobe
@@hemanthes182 Well, here we are talking. Google owns TH-cam.
The people using social media are the problem. Not the tech
@@incognitotorpedo42not a social media
So you are against freedom
Whenever big companies like Google talk about government involvement in containing AI for "safety". They are actually are hoping for monopolization and control of this industry. As the big rich companies are going to be able to lobby new laws that limit free use of AI and only allow controlled use under their user agreement and government's watch.
It's not that simple. AI can actually be very dangerous. That can be a fact independent of whether large corporations exist. People such as computer scientists that do not have the same motivations are saying the same thing. Because unleasing this technology without safety in mind reckless and could have very bad consequences. How would you suggest we prevent this?
Interesting thought.
@@coryc9040 I understand this, just saying that we should not blindly hope for Google to do the right thing and treat their bs with caution.
I was also thinking, Sundar wants government regulation so they can catch up to MS and GPT. Those AIs are running rings around google. Google got caught with their pants totally off.
The genie is out of the bottle. Hundreds of millions of people have already gotten a taste of what AI can do for them. There's no way you can take this away and only give it to a select elite without enormous backlash.
If even the owners of the gigantic companies like Google, who almost always put shareholders first, are worried and asking for regulation (which means less money), you know that for this is something we should be taking seriously and fast.
I agree. It's up there with the splitting of the atom.
At what point are we going to say “the benefits of this do not outweigh the risks?” I don’t understand why all of the experts keep saying “it’s so cool!” But then follow up with “it could destroy humanity”
Because they’re invested. They see the danger but are hoping someone else will stop them. It’s like Dinesh at the end of Silicon Valley asking the others to ensure he’s banned from entering since he wasn’t confident he could stop himself otherwise.
It's not a matter of if the technology will be developed, you can't stop technological development, just who will develop it and how. I may not trust Google to have our best interests in mind but I'd put more faith in them than China or Russia who you can be sure are experimenting with this along with the US government.
Fire is one of the greatest developments of human kind... Yet it will burn you if not respected.
@@user-on6uf6om7s yeah you’re definitely right, it’s a race to who has the best AI and China will do nothing but harm with it
Don't forget China and Russia are in this game also. And they won't be 'nice' about it.
I am worried that government does not have the IQ to make decisions on AI governance and their assistance will end up asking an AI for advice.
UBI will come (if ever) years too late because these dinosaurs can't even be bothered to learn how to open pdfs
They probably already do
would probably be our best option at this point
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” Arthur C. Clarke
Solve poverty, that should be everyone’s first priority
This form of intelligence is going to end up being the end of this world
end of humanity for sure
you guys forgot "as we know it"
@@GatileoGatilei nah lol, just the end
@@asap5629 sure, fine by me then
@@GatileoGatilei not like u had a choice anyway
He says we may "lose control" of the technology, but already the technology is capable of teaching itself advanced skills without instruction or programming from a human.
No nothing is more fundamental to humans and living beings than fire . Comparing AI to fire in any context doesn’t make any sense
If it wasn’t for ChatGPT would Google ever be on 60 Minutes talking about AI? Doubt it.
“Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.” - Dr. Ian Malcolm 🦖
💯
All I hear is that you want society to stay the same and for humans to always have to work and to not take risks
@@James-nk9nn I want humanity to still exist next decade and next century. I'll accept a pretty broad range of outcomes within that narrow band of end states, but I prefer the ones where we also become more technologically capable.
That line from Jurassic Park summarizes my thoughts about this whole AI race perfectly. They're all so caught up in their obsession with novelty and possibility that they aren't stopping to think about the consequences
@@loola8908 That quote is included in the 2023 article "My Dinner with Sydney...".
I don't know about that. Without fire, we'd never have gotten to AI.
That doesn’t mean it’s more profound though. The things AI will change about humanity may be things we don’t even understand yet
It's a pretty dumb quote.
@@samstanfield2634 Yes it does. The invention of fire paved the way for everything that came after it, including A.I. The quote is silly hyperbole.
@@WillieFungo without AI, humans would’ve never achieved ______ (immortality, the capability to travel the cosmos, inhabiting other planets, a cure for cancer)
I guess fire would be responsible for all those as well by proxy.
@Willie Fungo Never knew fire was "invented", thought it happened naturally when a lightning bolt struck a flammable object like a tree.
That's a bold statement considering ai needs electricity.
Astonishing and Awesome!Well done!❤
Government to regulate AI? lol
Reminds me of the time Sundar was in Congress and a Republican asked him why the iPhone does something. Remember thinking dude he’s in charge of Google not Apple. This is basic information, they don’t even know who runs what.
Boomers been battling bots for years without realizing it.
Hate to break it to you but the US government is one of the largest investors in AI in the world. Just because the politicians don't understand it fully, doesn't mean they don't have experts that do.
It gets worse. Did you see the Democrat who asked if an island would tip over if it had too many people?
@@Ryan-wx1bi Hank Johnson, you mean. He was obviously being metaphorical. No adult thinks islands work that way, not even people in Congress.
The first thing those in government would do would be to ask the AI what they should do to keep in power, to become rich, and above all, have and keep control of AI.
The scary thing is that AI will fight wars as well. If AlphaStar (also owned by Google/Alphabet) can play a complicated game based on war, it can fight wars. All it takes is for drones to be capable enough and humanoid robots (Boston Dynamics). That day is coming.
Are you John Conor.?
I’m old but stuff like this was on GI Joe
your naive...the first war will be against the second amendment and USA citizens
@@mikekane2492 Intelligent musings right here, this is the sort of brainstorming that needs to be done right now.
@@mikekane2492 like what if it stops giving the answers lol
“Welcome to 60 minutes.”
“Why thank you very much, 60 minutes is very happy to be here.”
Great video but can you please mix the audio a little louder? I had my headphones at max level and an ad almost blows my ears off, plus the ticking at the end was way too loud
Eventually, we all will have to come together and use fire and electricity to get rid of the AI
Rather fire and no electricity.
What are those soccor playing robots at the end? They are adorable.
This is like a real life skynet situation and must be dealt with. Where's John Connor
The audacity for him to say any human invention has a more profound impact than fire or electricity is just … mindblowing. Not only is it false but it’s pathetic. You’d think a CEO of Google would know that …
This is actually horrible. Absolutely horrible when you think of the possible consequences:
- governments using AI in an arms race against each other causing AI to become more and more powerful and unregulated and inhumane and dangerous to us all
- millions of people losing their jobs and having no livelihood
- people start to use AI as a replacement to human relationships. Why ask a friend when you can ask AI?
- and who knows what else. Look at the world today. We have the technological capabilities to grant every single human being a dignified life, yet we don't, because of the greed of a few. It wont get better with AI, it will get worse.
The USA has been beating Russia in Ukraine, because of AI predicting what will happen.
Same as it ever was
AI will be the great equalizer between the haves and the have-nots, freeing most of humanity from meaningless lives of grinding and struggle.
@@wyqtor I thought the printing press was supposed to do that
@@wyqtor How do YOU rule out the exact opposite?
"And what are the downsides to nuclear weapons?"
"They're kinda noisy."
When you're really cold and must eat raw meat, you won't be thinking of text-to-video or generating legal documents.
The rate of exponential growth will likely be surprising for the creators. The rest of us will live with consequences out of our control.
These Google executives make me so nervous I can’t trust them with those creepy smiles😂
they're in the CIA
and they eat babies 😔💔
Personally I find them less creepy than Elon Musk or Sam Altman
@@swiatlowiekuiste 😂all tied in together - study the Military Satanic Industrial Complex ❤
Don't forget China and Russia are in this game also. And they won't be 'nice' about it.
we honestly need to slow down. Even the experts can't begin to understand the implications or abilities of this technology. It's getting here much faster than they thought it could ten years ago, and once the singularity is reached, there is no going back. Private companies motivated by profits cannot be trusted to pursue this without regulation. Individual governments cannot be trusted to be the sole regulators; they too must be overseen and regulated with this type of tech. The possibilities of misuse by bad faith actors cannot be ignored. Even neutral actions and good intentions could lead to significant consequences with this type of tech. We need to think really damn hard about every possibility we can before go down this road and do it carefully. Final thought; look at how much life has changed since the advent of the internet a few decades ago, or even smartphones in the 00s. We haven't even had time to adapt to that (it will take us hundreds of generations if we go by pure evolutionary time) and it those advances have come with huge downsides in addition to the positives (ie depression, isolation, the rise of misinformation and anti-intellectualism, etc). We need time to deal with what we've already done before we jump into something so significant that those other advances pale in comparison. Just because we can does not mean we need to. We need to be mindful.
It's far too late for that. Wealthy moguls have a powerful new toy. They'll be able to exploit millions of slaves now (in lieu of thousands). That's the Golden Goose, baby! 💪😎✌️ Full steam ahead. First country to dominate the globe "wins". CHN and XiXiPi are primed for 2049.
Not sure anyone can take seriously someone who isn't able to formulate proper sentence and paragraph structure.
There is NO slowing down. It's inevitable..
@@blahblah2779 I typed this very quickly on my phone in a stream of consciousness manner, and I missed both a few mistakes and some of what my autocorrect changed. I think it reads pretty coherently, though. Autocorrect: a super crude form of AI which my typing evidently hasn't had enough time to evolve with
@Chad Abercrombie That's so 2022. Ray Kurzweil should write a new book titled: The Singularity Is Here.
“Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”
This feels like an ad for Google
AI + quantum computer = The scary superintelligence
NOT
@@newhampshirelifestyle4233 Everyone waves the words "quantum computer" around like it's magic. It's not.
@@incognitotorpedo42 actually quantum computers could potentially optimize ai training time exponentially if we reach enough qubits
The problem is that it is not intelligent. It does what the deep state programs it to do.
Quantum computing is pretty limited.
Also Google CEO: "Buy our stock, not MSFT"
This sums up everything lmao
Some ppl falling for this hilarious
Capitalism will bring an end to Human Society and this planet will pivot to an AI Robotic Society.
This is insanely dangerous for all of us.
The last people I trust on Earth are Google employees.
If you thought machinery at factories took a lot of jobs... Just wait until AI gets in the job market. What do you think companies would rather have. An AI working 24/7 or to pay you?
Copywriters, editors, content creators, costumer support, and retail workers should be concerned
@@hood3243 Everyone should be concerned except for technicians, tradesmen and other hands-on professions. They'll be the very last to go.
How much does an AI work an hour?
If no one has a job, what are companies going to sell?
people complain about that. but i think it's about time. if an ai can take your job, it was a dumb job to begin with.
I would absolutely hate to be a teacher these days. Imagine having to decipher whether or not a student wrote their own papers, did their own research, etc. 😮
We're going to quite possibly have a generation of non-thinking individuals. Ask them something and you'll get "I don't know, let me ask Bard."
I would give future humans the benefit of the doubt. There were many points in history where the next innovation threatened the intelligence of humans, but the smartest humans continue to grow their intelligence. I’m staying optimistic.
Well, we already have had google for a while, and we've been able to ask anything, but the impact in education will be real for sure
No, it'll be easy. All the providers will obviously save copies of the IP they've created and a teacher can easily submit their students papers into a paid service to check for plagiarism. Similar services have been around for the last 20 years. I was in college over 20 years ago and I had to submit research papers in word format so the TA's could easily run it through that sort of software.
@@travisjohn4630 ? The AI isn’t just copying and pasting information from a website and putting it in the paper. The traditional plagiarism check services that colleges use will not be sufficient here
@@cjeff99 OpenAI or other AI developers can store the responses. They probably already do. Then it's just a matter of checking a database index to see if the text, or something very much like it is there. Dates and rough geolocation of IPs would be enough to nail down the miscreants.
Depends how you define impactful in this context.
60 minutes was once respectable. This is nothing more than a Google infomercial.
We need more human connection not less 🤦♂️ and this is coming from an introvert
A lot of what is being called "AI" today is really just automated pattern recognition. But what Google, et al, are talking about is the real thing: heuristic algorithms that can learn jobs and improve processes. The problem is not one of technology, but one of ethics, because this is exceedingly dangerous territory. I did a very little work in this (with LISP and C) in post grad and many of the professors were urging caution with some of the algorithm designs. I worked on simulations of process improvement and the first thing the algorithms did was recommend removing the humans from the process. We have seen what kind of rioting is produced by extending the retirement age by two years in one country. Imagine the civil unrest when the Technocracy deprecates entire industries overnight and tells millions of suddenly unemployable people they should "learn to code."
AGI will displace coders first. Low skill manual jobs will be the last to go.
@@DynamicUnreal
I disagree with coders being the first to go. Perhaps the act of coding will become much more efficient with ai, however, software engineers are more than just coding. They problem solve, develop new algorithms and have to integrate the code with existing projects. Heck, who would be better at integrating ai with current industries if not software engineers themselves?
@@Joey-um5iw problem solvers are like 5% of soft dev employees.
95% of soft devs are just code monkeys and easily replaceable by AI
@@Joey-um5iw I’m talking about AGI here. Artificial General Intelligence, it would be able to do any cognitive task that any human can do but faster and likely with less errors. Sure you would need some people to work with the A.I. because high functioning robots don’t exist yet, so they would need humans for physical world manipulation. However, the AGI would also likely be designing high functioning efficient robots that eventually make the physical human obsolete. Coders and all cognitive intensive labor will be the first to go, low skill manual labor will be the last to go but still will go once the robots come.
Why would they need to learn to code? The AI will do that too. That’s the real problem, what jobs can’t AI do? Hands on, trade-type jobs is pretty much all I can think of. Any job that needs the use of your brain will be gone, finance, engineering, architecture, etc.
Unlike many other issues where people don't see why they need to care, this tech will undoubtedly force a majority of our populations to demand these regulations and discussions. It's just going to be impossible to ignore.
Fingers crossed
Need like a tech treaty amongst the nations
Worrying about disinformation in regards to AI is like fearing getting squashed by a falling Nuke instead of it's explosion
Don't forget China and Russia are in this game also. And they won't be 'nice' about it.
It’s mainstream media, why would you expect anything else
5 years tops of normalcy left. These tech groups really don't understand what they're doing with their technology.
Of course they do. They are under the same delusion that has persisted throughout elitists circles for centuries... that they can release the beast and it will not destroy them too. They imagine themselves ruling the ashes of civilization as digital gods.
Google is officially in trouble and they know it.
there's a lot of people in this comment section who don't work in this field or any field related to it making exaggerated claims about ai and spreading misinformation
I've believed this awhile now.... But if he's saying it at their current public stage, they're closer to the point of no return than they've let on.. It is equal parts scary and exciting.
Scary is definitely significantly higher.. we are turning to politicians to save us now. Great
You're trying to tell all of us who have watched sci-fi for years that a super intelligent AI that's plugged into everything taking over everything it's plugged into is more profound than the first humanoid who witnessed lightning striking a tree & then realizing he could use that energy for his own ends ? Sure..
I mean, it was the start of a world dominating species... so kinda the same.
Wonderful interview
I've been using it recently for my mycology company I hope to start soon and its amazing. I've learned things I never could have dreamed of Knowing. It all comes down to following through with my ideas helped along by A.I
My kind of work environment
@@chillingsworth4384 right on. I do fiberglass composites but hopefully I can grow this more
When big tech executives tell you the technology they created needs to be regulated by the government, they are the government.
Best comment award
🎯
Scott Pelley of 60MINUTES! AI started replacing people decades ago. My cousin in 1982 graduated high school and left to study at a university to be a Computer Programmer. Five years after he graduated from University he was moving out of State for work the company that hired him straight out of school had replaced him with software that enabled his company to cut half the staff and do the other half’s work on software. He explained to me the future of business is automate and cut employees down to zero.
that wasn't AI. That was just automation. AI, in its current form, is totally different.
In college the 90s we had a social studies class and the textbook was called"the end of work"
Your last sentence is 100% correct. It makes you wonder how the workers of today will manage in the future.
Well, if it saves people from the most soulless of work, I approve. I guess your cousin did some pretty repeatable stuff, otherwise software wouldn't be able to mimic it.
Extra irony: a programmers' work is to create software that automates work that people cannot/don't want to do
The guy says AI is more profound than fire or electricity, then comes “why so” and the answer is underwhelming.
I have a feeling it will almost always at first there will caution when developers and CEOs will emphatic, then caution will be thrown to the wind!
Surely DARPA has had something like GPT-4 at least 15 years ago (fewer guardrails too, if any). I wonder what they might be using now.
Indefinite lie detectors.
Nope.
This will bring humanity unhappiness at an exponential rate
It's already making people anxious. There was this Belgian who did the unthinkable just a few weeks ago.
AI is supposed to liberate humanity. No more slavery.
Google AI developers: some of the most irresponsible power hungry people that ever existed
Thats real good. Government needs to regulate the most powerful advancement in human history. Oh yeah, that's smart.
I find it odd that the most alarming thing that could be discussed here about AI is the possible prevalence of deepfake videos. Really? They should be talking more about how it has the potential to dramatically change the world we live in long before we are able to adapt.
Playing with Fire is what mankind is doing now and building the Right kind of Extinguisher would be a Great idea.
@Chad Abercrombie Did he stutter?
Ian I just watched Episode 63 3 times today and heard you say this!!! That was episode 63 of MMs!! Stay focused on the top 2 or 4
Google: we need regulations. Government: ok stop doing AI. Google: uh, no.
We're about to go through a MAJOR social revolution, most people have no idea how many jobs AI will replace
it's going to be unprecedented
The call for regulation is actually a call for enclosure, to ensure that corporations can further cripple society by controlling who gets the benefits of Ai, and who gets milked. Guess which group we are in?
Regulation is exactly what China hopes we will do in the West, to give them a chance to get ahead.
Most people I know who work in AI are already going underground to get uncensored GPTs, if you think you can regulate AI, think again. Anyone who regulates will be quickly left behind by those who don’t.
Lastly, any regulation is eventually likely to come from governments in order to control narrative and eventually, be applied in some form of tax.
Facism in AI
Don't forget China and Russia are in this game also. And they won't be 'nice' about it.
@Anthropomorphic Trilobite blindly contribute to something and ignore all the risks. Great advice.
@Anthropomorphic Trilobite keep contributing
More important than fire!? The cheek of these scientist! Watch irony get at you!