Will regular fuel or premium get better mileage in your Lexus GX470?

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 211

  • @jeremyking3986
    @jeremyking3986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    FYI, I was a petroleum inspector and went around testing the octane levels at gas stations. I never had a mid grade test below 90 octane, and you have a 50/50 chance of actually getting 93 out of the mid grade tank. If not it will be 90, 91, or 92. I always recommend if you want premium, just buy mid grade, and you’ll be close enough for less money.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That explains my Acura we had that did require higher grade to not have valve chatter and premature detonation. We just ran mid grade and did fine but couldn’t run 87 at all.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for the insight!

    • @SkyBehind
      @SkyBehind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is really really good information to know. Would have never guessed and wouldn’t have even thought to look that up, actual levels. Also, I didn’t know the gas was regularly tested at stations.

    • @jeremyking3986
      @jeremyking3986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@SkyBehind it’s for 2 reasons, to make sure they’re getting what they paid for, and to comply with consumer standards to avoid fines. Fines are huge if they get caught selling gas that is under the octane promised.

    • @snakehead324
      @snakehead324 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Curious what states you inspected in? I’ve personally heard from my tuner that CA/AZ/NV has especially crappy 91 octane. Wonder what octane I actually get as I see decreases in knock running half or a full can of Quality octane boosters like VP octanium unleaded/boostane/torco unleaded.

  • @casparcoaster1936
    @casparcoaster1936 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Appreciate you taking the time man, many thanks

  • @dermotwallace5533
    @dermotwallace5533 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this very intuitive contribution. It came quite when I needed it most.

  • @diydaddy5092
    @diydaddy5092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Ran Premium for the first 90k on my GX470 then been running Regular for the last 80k miles. It’s still smooth as silk and runs like a champ!

    • @tylervankampen6160
      @tylervankampen6160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What year is your GX470?

    • @diydaddy5092
      @diydaddy5092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      07

    • @tylervankampen6160
      @tylervankampen6160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@diydaddy5092 go to hear that. I just picked up a 2007 also. Just trying to zero in on why a 2007 4Runner/tundra with the same 4.7 can run regular but the GX470 needs premium 🤷

    • @yiayang3403
      @yiayang3403 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tylervankampen6160 @@tylervankampen6160 just bought my 06 GX470 and been trying to do so some research on why also. Didn't make sense because it's the same motor. Fill my first tank with 93 but I'm thinking about going to 87. What did you end up going with?

    • @markeverson5849
      @markeverson5849 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tylervankampen6160 maybe it was just sales prank for the big ego! for the thick wallet Anything is Possible when you're dealing with Rich Elites :-) what do you think?

  • @rocketrollsvlogs7625
    @rocketrollsvlogs7625 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was the best video i have seen on this debate. The presentation was simple and "country" the way i needed, but i am sure your wife approved of your scientific method. Thanks.

  • @iheartgs400
    @iheartgs400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My sister used to own a 2002 LX470 she mainly ran on 87 octane never had any issues and pulled very strongly same thing with my GX470 I pumped 87 Costco fuel and ran like a champ. Usually for my performance cars I’ll do with premium I mean the 2UZ is a low rev torque machine that really won’t benefit much from 91.

  • @TravelinCatfish
    @TravelinCatfish 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Started to run 87 early last year in my 05’.
    Started popping emissions codes. Thought it was an issue with the gas cap but decided to run 93 on a couple of fill ups.
    Haven’t thrown another code since going back to 93.

  • @gfire369
    @gfire369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is exactly 💯 same 4.7 that's in other yotas! I never ran anything but regular in mine. I meticulously run a bottle of royal purple cleaner through every oil change

  • @fabiangarza2640
    @fabiangarza2640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the info 👍!

  • @michaelmckay8719
    @michaelmckay8719 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    My 08 470 has been running 87 for 200,000 miles. Still runs smooth as silk. No issues.

    • @mathewsenn
      @mathewsenn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      if you live close enough to sea level we can run just about any gas in these, but higher up I would be inclined to at least get mid-grade

    • @Soccerdude5
      @Soccerdude5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Update?? Looking at one myself

    • @SupramanTRD
      @SupramanTRD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lucky because the 2007-2009 have a 10.0:1 compression ratio. This is why the manual requires premium for those years. Whereas 2004-2006 runs on regular because of the 9.6:1 compression ratio.

    • @EverydayCars
      @EverydayCars หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SupramanTRDActually 03 - 04 don’t have Variable Valve Timing. They only require 87 octane. 05+ recommended 91 octane.

  • @chriswhitehouse9764
    @chriswhitehouse9764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When comparing octanes and vehicle performance, If I don’t get any knocking or pre-detonation, I don’t care what mpg I get! Yes I typed correctly.
    I only care what miles per DOLLAR I get. You hinted at it here early in your video.
    Of course I check my plugs to SEE what’s going on if I have any question.

  • @w_dub_wilberforcejr
    @w_dub_wilberforcejr ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx for the info bro👊🏽

  • @rjhein
    @rjhein 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I drove a 1998 LX470 that also "recommended" premium fuel. All the engine parts right down to the part numbers, as well as compression ratio, were 100% identical to the tundra and landcruiser engine. Same same same all around. I bought it at 140k miles and put 100k miles on it from there - all on regular gas. Never put in premium - Never had any issue. Nothing. No discernable difference in power/performance even while towing. Now we're buying a Lexus LX570 (used 2008 model) with 90k miles. Literally every engine part (practically) including all internals match, including compression ratio match the landcruiser which recommends only 87 octane regular gas. So no, won't be using premium, and I'll put money on never having an issue with it. Premium is a waste of money for these vehicles. But I'm not speaking for other brands, it's important to check that.

    • @MissouriAdventures
      @MissouriAdventures 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Car Care Nut would disagree with you that they are the same. He has a Land Cruiser video where he talks about this.

    • @rjhein
      @rjhein 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MissouriAdventures Yes, I'm aware of that. He's a great mechanic, and in general, I agree with him. It's been over 2 years now since I've been running regular in my LX570, and it runs awesome. The main reasoning in my comment comes down to compression ratio and the very low strung nature of these engines. In most other vehicles I'd likely just follow manufacturers recommendation on that part... But the 5.7 isn't really tuned much different, if at all. Perhaps one day, many years from now, I may find out I'm wrong on that lol - I hope not... But I do doubt it :)

    • @MissouriAdventures
      @MissouriAdventures 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rjhein my comment was in regards to the Land Cruiser & Tundra engine being the same CCN disagrees. But yes, I run mine on regular too with zero problems. Many have for hundreds of thousands of miles. We’re not breaking any new ground here. I let a guy last weekend that doesn’t change his oil for 12-15k miles. Said these engines are just different. I’m sure there’s a whole thread on it on Mud I just haven’t looked yet.

    • @rjhein
      @rjhein 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MissouriAdventures afaik the land cruiser also requires only regular fuel, according to the owners manual... So regarding the Land cruiser and LX engine, what are the meaningful differences that would result in long-term damage from the usage of regular fuel? The last time I checked the compression ratio was the same... These engines are extremely low strung... I'm also not recommending anybody else do what I'm doing... As far as I'm concerned people can go ahead and put orange juice into their tank lol

  • @Farallonjoe
    @Farallonjoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I did the same test after thinking 91 would get better mileage. Both tanks running through Nevada at high speed. I got slightly better mpg, about 1 mpg, but passing at 80mph was noticeably slower. Different brands of gas though so who really knows. Maybe do the test with summer blend as well, could be a bigger difference?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Might. I’ll see which ones I have come summer blend on the lot and try it again maybe

  • @DannyCal
    @DannyCal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my fiancé drives a 2010 mitsubishi outlander GT, it recommends premium, however, we've always ran regular just over 135k miles later and never a single issue!

    • @daltonmeredith6790
      @daltonmeredith6790 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's surprising because those are cheap ecnoboxes known for terrible build quality and bad transmissions

  • @rxw5520
    @rxw5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I ran premium on my 470 for years because cost saving was maybe 200 bucks annually. Now premium is $18 a tank higher, so I go regular with zero difference.

  • @gncc600
    @gncc600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    FYI.... Premium fuel does not burn any cleaner than regular. I'm an engineer for Marathon Petroleum and I can tell you that the fuels, additives... etc are exactly the same. The only difference is the octane added to the fuel. There is ZERO advantage to running premium unless your engine is designed for it.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. In layman’s terms “cleaner” makes sense for most people. The GX engines tune doesn’t require the higher octane to burn/run efficiently. I just wanted to physically show something to the people buying them that it doesn’t help. Knock sensors would go nuts if you used fuel with too low of an octane and the engine needed else.

    • @nicholash8021
      @nicholash8021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Web Gem, does the difference in price between grades really equal the extra cost of adding octane, or is the price difference mostly extra profit?

    • @gncc600
      @gncc600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nicholash8021 Great question... The extra costs have more to do with the fuel being made in smaller batches rather than the cost of the octane. If premium were made on the same scale as regular it would only cost a few cents more. Of all the fuel we make only about 10% is premium.

  • @vkhiev
    @vkhiev 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I use mid grade in all my premium vehicles all getting 250k-350k miles and still going

  • @ILUVJDM0051
    @ILUVJDM0051 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the info

  • @gesigesi1579
    @gesigesi1579 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro how much mph can u make with a full fuel tank

  • @427dorosz
    @427dorosz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My fuel station doesn't offer a mid-grade octane, just 87 and 93. I was filling up my 2007 GX 470 with half and half for the first 30k miles but the filling station was originally selling 93 octane at about 40¢ a gallon more than the 87. They changed the difference to 90¢ a gallon, so I started using 87 octane 100%. I have seen zero change in performance. I don't change filling stations because I buy all of my fuel from a big box warehouse store, which shall remain nameless. Between their significantly lower prices, and 4% cash back I usually pay between 30¢ and 50¢ a gallon less than anywhere else. I do maintain a strict oil change regimen of 5,000 miles on synthetic oil.

  • @jmleon92
    @jmleon92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just found your channel and it has a lot of good info! Maybe you've already said it, but where are you located?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Near Tuscaloosa AL

    • @jmleon92
      @jmleon92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah. I was hoping closer to middle TN! I'm in the market for one of these. Could we have a private chat to discuss some details and maybe I can go pick one up from you one of these days :)

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure 205-657-1590 I just delivered one up there recently

  • @ericbarkhurst2951
    @ericbarkhurst2951 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I run mid grade all the time. I don't care what people say, running in the mid tier has always been good for my engines (fuel mileage aside). The lower grades are hit and miss especially in weird fuel brands.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And that works as well. I’ve got multiple 200 and 300,000 mile vehicles with running low-grade so I haven’t seen shit to pay the extra. Hard to argue that it’s not a better fuel tho

  • @cardentyler
    @cardentyler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My sequoia doesn’t recommend premium and has the same engine. Iv ran premium in all my Lexus vehicle and I still will. It’s just odd they specify a difference between the same motor between the Toyota and Lexus. I figured it was just that the Lexus was tuned for 91

  • @agpawpaw5912
    @agpawpaw5912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it recommended or required? Look like newer Lexus line stated required premium. If it’s recommended I would use regular. Unless you want to race in hot humid conditions, then you might will see little difference. I’m personally can’t see

  • @salimaftim3787
    @salimaftim3787 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looking at one tomorrow

  • @slashtrio
    @slashtrio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m really enjoying my GX 470. I have a 2006 with 179k. Do you know how much a new dash is for one of these? Mine has the original dash and it appears the previous owner tried to stop the crack from progressing by cutting a square in the dash on the passengers side. They also clearly used some heavy duty armor all type of stuff on the dash and now it’s so damn shiny that I get a terrible reflection off of it on sunny days. It would be cool to get a replacement. Thanks

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Coverlay lays on top and glues down it’s about 375
      A new dash from Lexus of Mobile is $650 for parts

    • @slashtrio
      @slashtrio 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 thanks for the info 👍🏼

    • @jasonsidmore
      @jasonsidmore ปีที่แล้ว

      Replaced under warranty on 470

    • @slashtrio
      @slashtrio ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonsidmore even now? I have had the truck for a few years, it’s a 2006.

    • @kenliuwho9331
      @kenliuwho9331 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@jasonsidmoreWhen?

  • @Steve-bh3zg
    @Steve-bh3zg ปีที่แล้ว

    Premium at 3.09 a year ago now it’s 4.25 here in fl 😭😭😭

  • @tylerengland4526
    @tylerengland4526 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Premium is not a “cleaner” fuel. I don’t know where you get that information. Some vendors add additional detergents to their premium fuel.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I explain octanes a bit more around the 7 minute mark. It’s common speak to call it a cleaner fuel, albeit incorrect as you pointed out.

  • @dustintyer8548
    @dustintyer8548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What’s the name of your dealership and do you have a gx470 for sale

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I’ll have more coming but all of my current ones are under contract
      JLM Auto Sales

  • @7sunsetmaro7
    @7sunsetmaro7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just bought a 06 GX470 with 221k miles. Put 89 Oct in it for the first time and a couple days later, check engine light. I can tell the last owner changed out the gas cap. Maybe that's the issue or do I really need to run premium? From the comments, sounds like I don't maybe it's a coincidence

  • @All_in_mech
    @All_in_mech 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey , i need help , i have gx470 and my rear air suspension not going up much , compressor working, when i hit height control button compressor start light blinking compressor run and stop and light stop high , but car still low just light bit above from wheel almost 2” , when i start driving go again low all the way and during drive hit wheel that’s scary

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like your bags are busted. Time for a replacement or coil conversion. Hard to say that 100% from here but the symptoms sound the same

    • @daletennyson1578
      @daletennyson1578 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very common on this model. Mine did it a few months ago. Conversion kit to springs is what is recommended.

    • @All_in_mech
      @All_in_mech 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 yes sir right airbag sound hissing air , means air leak , I don’t wanna conversion because i wanna sale and noboday gonna buy conversion

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      All of mine are converted and I can’t keep them in stock. But you can replace the airbags too

    • @All_in_mech
      @All_in_mech 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 it’s started today not even going up , one side all the way down , so today i start inspection and heard hissing sound , compressor working when i move height switch but after lit bit time stop and and car still down just lit bit up and height control switch stop working not going up and down , no engine code , 145k mileage, 2004 , i just changed shocks

  • @Soccerdude5
    @Soccerdude5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this the same for the 08 gx 470? Ive read some threads saying before 05 regular and after premium… but I’m guessing regular is fine..

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haven’t had any issue on any of ours no matter the year

    • @Soccerdude5
      @Soccerdude5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 have you tested on a 08,07 or 09?

  • @Eatshhhushi
    @Eatshhhushi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Got a ‘23 GX 460 Luxury and I use premium fuel only. My area has 93 grade and I use Top tier gas. MPG is better for me but more important is the additives to clean the engine and valves. Top Tier does a better job of cleaning the engine.

    • @billlam7756
      @billlam7756 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      A waste of money. You'll realised that a year down the road. Had a 15 gx, 21 gx now

  • @mr.infamous8229
    @mr.infamous8229 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tried running premium in my 04 GX and didn't see improvement over mid in mpg or power. I did notice it was rougher running and got worse mileage running low grade so that was the only tank of low I ran through it. Mid grade every tank and only top tier fuel

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve never had any of those that I’ve owned to show any difference between grades, but mid grade is typically just is high octane as the supreme according to one of the commenters who checks fuel for a living 😬

    • @mr.infamous8229
      @mr.infamous8229 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 Yeah I can definitely tell a difference in the low grade but not mid and high. I've had several vehicles that didn't like low grade as well, some of my older civics got 3-5 more mpg on mid and ran much smoother vs low. Why I've always run mid unless it called for premium

  • @borismccallum5319
    @borismccallum5319 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 2004 Lexus Gx 470 do service Timing Belt

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are you asking for a video on it or are you wanting us to price that job out?

  • @jamesowens8218
    @jamesowens8218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I"m never going back to Premium again!!!!

  • @Randy-hk6vq
    @Randy-hk6vq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, I run 87 with no issue, but that might be part of the problem we have with the 09 Murano we have.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hear a chatter?

    • @Randy-hk6vq
      @Randy-hk6vq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 not on my Gx and I get 19ish mpg on the interstate 🙌. Lol I do every once in a while with that Murano though.

  • @owenw809
    @owenw809 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi.Sir. I added 87gas at first time. After i get the car. Is that a big problem? Thank you

    • @owenw809
      @owenw809 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My car is 2022 gx460

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I haven’t dove into the 22 GX engines that far yet

    • @mohsinahmad2894
      @mohsinahmad2894 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How did it end up? I'm guessing it should have worked out fine as I also put regular to mid.

  • @erichdiebenow4727
    @erichdiebenow4727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this apply with the gx 460 as well?

  • @onesent-zn2cv
    @onesent-zn2cv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which gas do you like Exxon, Chevron, or Shell.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I find myself using Chevron the most, but I really don’t have a major preference there

    • @onesent-zn2cv
      @onesent-zn2cv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have a Highlander and seems like i get better performance and fuel mileage with Chevron first and Exxon second.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be worth looking at and testing. No telling

  • @joeevans1687
    @joeevans1687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I run my GX about 100 miles a day and have tried both 89 and 93 with the 10% ethanol mix. The mid grade works fine in mine with a 17.4 mpg average on standard size AT tires. I do put in a half tank of 93 every couple of weeks to be sure my octane is over 90.

    • @SkyBehind
      @SkyBehind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Did you see the comment above? About mid always being over 90? Interesting.

    • @joeevans1687
      @joeevans1687 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SkyBehind I saw it, and that's good to know!

    • @Grant3758
      @Grant3758 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that 17.4 mixed driving? Would it be about the same on pure highway roadtrip driving?

  • @aaronfrench8322
    @aaronfrench8322 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, everyone should run Top Tier Gasoline whether you use either regular or premium.

  • @maddog8148
    @maddog8148 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 2008 GX 470. I put premium in it because long term matters. I have 201K on it. Runs like it’s new! I would rather be safe than sorry. For a couple of cents more it pays. Period. ❤️🙌🏼🇺🇸💪🏼👍🏼

  • @TheTexasOiler
    @TheTexasOiler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If your Gx has VVTI then premium is optimal for your engine due to the vvti adjust the cams accordingly but the 1uz without vvti runs regular fuel 2003-2004

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't think you'll find harm either way. Here is a pretty good take on the issue forum.ih8mud.com/threads/gx470-octane-just-some-research-is-all-talk-among-yourselves.996468/

    • @Kauffman578
      @Kauffman578 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a gx470, so it should be regular?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s just my experience with them, no valve chatter and no issues with any I’ve had running regular. Everyone I personally know with one runs regular as well.

  • @manimalworks7424
    @manimalworks7424 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, Bro, try the fuel without ethanol, we all know you get much lower mpg with ethanol

  • @Recovering_Californian
    @Recovering_Californian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I run premium because there isn't any ethanol added to it. Ethanal, as I understand it, robs some power and efficiency. It also attracts water. I'd wonder if there is a significant difference between fuel with ethanol and fuel with out.

  • @itsnotcris
    @itsnotcris 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the 460?

  • @Pancho8091
    @Pancho8091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have over 300,000 miles on my Lexus gx470 2006. Have always used premium gas.
    This is interesting though

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One of my battalion chiefs has a 2007 his wife drives 4 450,000 miles on it now. Pretty sure they use regular gas but I’ll have to check. The compression rate is actually exactly the same and the tune Lexus puts on this engine call only get 3 hp more than the V8 4Runner

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hopefully you can make out what I was trying to say there I’m talking to my phone trying to multitask

    • @Pancho8091
      @Pancho8091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I get about 200miles to the tank so it’s definitely a gas guzzler

    • @shawnballard794
      @shawnballard794 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pancho8091 oh wow I get 300 upwards

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same on ours, 300+

  • @Moondoggy1941
    @Moondoggy1941 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    2;:60 to 3:10 Premium at Costco Ca.

  • @jorvega123
    @jorvega123 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bought mine with 20k miles and have 210k all regular gas!

  • @thepoeet
    @thepoeet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i only want to buy my next car at his dealership lol

  • @dylanoldham2066
    @dylanoldham2066 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s just a 4.7 . Run 87 all day

  • @nosofast
    @nosofast 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos but your audio is so low its hard to hear what your saying.

  • @redbone7040
    @redbone7040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a heavy vehicle mileage will be the same

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s a huge argument on a lot of forums so I wanted to test it out and document. I don’t think I got as much in city driving with the premium which would account for the tiny difference

  • @Moondoggy1941
    @Moondoggy1941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I get about 12 miles to the gallon with premium.

  • @jessetate6244
    @jessetate6244 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I don't see any data or information that premium is any cleaner than 87. The octane rating, or the pressure at which it detonates, is the only thing guaranteed.

  • @torreyinnewyorkcity334
    @torreyinnewyorkcity334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the guy I purchased my Gx from burn 87 for the last 5 years. 😬. I have a LS 400 and Ed 330 only use premium fuel. I just want to be safe. The GX 470 the premium gas is going to kill me. Ha ha

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Run mid grade if you’re worried on it, like one guy here who was a fuel tech said most of the time mid grade tested to be 93 octane anyway

  • @Pennychaser1
    @Pennychaser1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never use premium on my 08 gx470. This is not a high revving high HP engine ao regular should be fine. My '15 GS350 F sport and other high HP cars on the other hand premium is a must

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No doubt, my hopped up CTSV and corvettes and such I’ve always ran premium on, but this tune doesn’t require it

  • @mikegyro
    @mikegyro 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How long before you need to replace your cat because of 87?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The UZ engine is the same engine as the 4.7 in the 4Runner. They both make 10:1 compression. The only difference Lexus can tell you if you call them is the tune gives you 3 more HP and about 15 or so ft/lb of torque. The engine is designed to recognize the fuel and not end up knocking. The tune is not significant enough to cause long term damage to any component in my opinion

    • @juanpinto5743
      @juanpinto5743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 Is that the same situation with the 5.7 engine in the tundra vs the lx570? Same engine, different tune?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should be but I’ll have to dive into that one a little more

    • @juanpinto5743
      @juanpinto5743 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@crutchfieldautomotive7936 No worries. I just figured it’s typical toyota: regular fuel for the mass vehicle, premium for the luxury vehicle. But it’s the same exact engine.

  • @josephoverstreet5584
    @josephoverstreet5584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol 3.09 for premium. I miss those days.

  • @chuckcts-v3460
    @chuckcts-v3460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Read your owner manual. I always use Shell, it is a Top Tier gasoline. Top Tier gasoline has a different additive package than a Non-Top Tier gasoline. Buy gas for the cheapest price is not good for your engine, the price is less for a reason. I have always had high performance cars and never get any valve knock with Shell Premium gas. If you do not like Shell, find other Top Tier brands and use them. Buy a car that is supposed to run on 87, problem solved.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also run top end cars that need 91-93. They get it. This Lexus engine runs fine on 87 with no knock or need for the higher octane. I’ve had corvettes and mustangs and CTSV’s etc that all needed 93. They all got it. This one doesn’t

  • @vitkir1217
    @vitkir1217 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lexus Is asking for premium gas, and Toyota 4 Runner w/ same engine set up asking 87 grade fuel.

  • @MC4D.
    @MC4D. ปีที่แล้ว

    - From my personal experience I believe that it can affect the emission parts of the vehicle in the long run.
    - I've owned a 98 es300 from 2016-2018, totalled it by hitting a deer) that recommended premium fuel. The previous owner used cheap 87 for the entire time he owned it (since 2001) and the knock sensors and evap canister needed replacing.
    - being mechanically inclined and understanding of different octane, I can tell you that the lower octane caused emissions systems to fail during my ownership (I always used 93 octane).

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right and if you’re getting valve chatter you 100% need the higher octane. We’ve got a local GX running 87 with near 600k and no emissions issues. Some of these like the ES are definitely going to need it, some like the GX IMO don’t require

  • @ronswanson8563
    @ronswanson8563 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Premium was not even $0.05 more than regular when moved to Houston in 2013. We should just stop having premium subsidize the ethanol crap and whatever else.

  • @georgec2562
    @georgec2562 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't believe that higher octane is necessarily cleaner. Talk like that will cause people to waste money.

  • @batuaerial213
    @batuaerial213 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2003-2004 Regular runs fine, 2005-2009(VVTI) premium gas gives you better MPG. :)

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We couldn’t get the VVTI to get any better fuel mileage so far. Some may, but we couldn’t so far.

  • @KiaShah
    @KiaShah 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d give my left….kidney for $3.09 a gallon of even regular today 😔

  • @thepitpatrol
    @thepitpatrol ปีที่แล้ว

    Just run regular and you will be 100% fine.

    • @thepitpatrol
      @thepitpatrol ปีที่แล้ว

      I should elaborate. We have two of these. One with 103,000. One with 340,000 neither has been in a shop and neither has ever had anything but regular run in them. These aren't as "sexy" as some suv's. I get that but for plain old drive everyday, abuse the maintenance schedule and still never have a problem they can't be beat. We call ours the new third gen 4runner.

  • @PSNCHOCOLATEMILK99
    @PSNCHOCOLATEMILK99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pinky wave 😂

  • @larrymartin7276
    @larrymartin7276 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No

  • @cpscps2679
    @cpscps2679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    93 is NOT a cleaner fuel than 87.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Is that what you got from that entire video? did I say cleaner one time? I explained what octane means at the end

  • @baldeagle3580
    @baldeagle3580 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Valve chatter? Where did this guy hear that term? There's no such thing. When a higher compression ratio engine needs premium fuel (higer octane rating), and you burn regular fuel in it, the engine can produce pre-ignition detonation, or "pinging ." THAT'S the sound you're hearing. Modern vehicle's have ECM's that will prevent that by retarding the ignition timing.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s truly a term used with gas line pressure relief valves, but it gets used interchangeably with pinging, knocking or spark knock, at least in my experience it’s been called all of the above

    • @gwilli1754
      @gwilli1754 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Retarding the ignition timing does not stop premature ignition, it would need to change the pressures to stop premature ignition. But when the engines are the same…

  • @ashdobbs7492
    @ashdobbs7492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    every fifth tank or so I run half 87 and half diesel to clean the valves

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You mix diesel in? Haven’t heard of that one

    • @patrickwhitney1847
      @patrickwhitney1847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Well thats just some bullshit

    • @johncyr181
      @johncyr181 ปีที่แล้ว

      Patrick - Truer words never spoken... Cracks me up what BS some people believe.

    • @mohsinahmad2894
      @mohsinahmad2894 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am actually in pure shock after reading this. Are you ok? Is the car ok? Any injuries?

  • @buffsamuraifred6037
    @buffsamuraifred6037 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s a naturally aspirated v8 pulling a heavy suv 😂😂.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh I don’t expect it to get great fuel mileage at all. This is just heavily debated on the forums so I put it to the test 👍🏼

  • @secretistobangtherockstogether
    @secretistobangtherockstogether 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok so you drove 100 miles with a different octane. Wow what a rigorous testing procedure. What pearl of wisdom was I supposed to glean from your anecdotal evidence regarding your ownership of an Acura again?

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would you be happier with 200 miles? The Acura was to let you know valve chatter is a bad thing if you didn’t know (as some people wouldn’t) and with that vehicle you actually had to run the higher octane because of the compression ratio. Cool flex bro?

    • @secretistobangtherockstogether
      @secretistobangtherockstogether 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't get worked up when you make a video where you contradict yourself, run a test but make no conclusions you want to stand behind, and then get called out. This video is really just your opinion, and my opinion is that it's not a good video.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The conclusion was 100% that 93 octane is unnecessary in the GX and I explained why. However, if you get valve chatter in yours (because as you said, this is limited) then up the octane for your specific vehicle. Not sure how your drew the conclusion that I won’t stand behind anything? I explained why the Acura was relevant and you decided you had to stick around and be negative after your point became null and void. Ain’t nobody got time for that 😂

  • @lebushaw
    @lebushaw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The engineers recommend premium for a reason - use it.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It literally has the same compression ratio of 10 to 1. Again I’m not advocating for either one. The tune it has only gives you 3 hp gained and is the same engine otherwise internally. All I can give is anecdotal evidence based on use

    • @WiliamShattner
      @WiliamShattner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are assuming it is the engineers who recommended it. I am convinced it is the marketing department that recommends it. It makes the vehicle seem more premium. Been using regular for years in my lx470. No problems at all.

    • @crutchfieldautomotive7936
      @crutchfieldautomotive7936  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WiliamShattner don’t disagree with that at all

    • @shawnballard794
      @shawnballard794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WiliamShattner I agree 100% precent