Someone explained this with shopping carts -- Lawful good: returns cart to inside store Neutral good: leaves cart in parking lot but makes sure it's not blocking a space Chaotic good: gives cart to someone just arriving Lawful neutral: puts cart in that little corral in parking lot True neutral: leaves cart wherever he finishes with it Chaotic neutral: shoves cart in random direction and walks away Lawful evil: puts cart in corral backwards so that it wastes space and makes the guy's job harder Neutral evil: puts cart so that it blocks someone from pulling out or getting his door open Chaotic evil: steals cart
I got neutral evil, and a lot of things of the description fits, but I do return the shopping carts, and i occasionally find myself hating the people who don't, unfortunately the majority.
@@spider-saiyan0475 I don’t think so. If you would go against your personal code then it isn’t a personal code, because a personal code is something you would never go against. For instance, there are things I might be forced to do that go against my beliefs or my nature, but there are also things I would never do under any circumstances even if someone was trying to force me. Wherever you draw the line, that is your personal code.
It's unfortunate that FlashBamg skipped over this, I think they can take some constructive criticism from this. When I use AI, I use it to help me learn how to do things instead of having it do something for me. AI is a great tool, bit it should be for working with people instead of for people imo. But, if they didn't use AI to make the video, then I guess this point doesn't matter in this context. It's still important to say this anyways.
Depends on which Rick you are talking about. Rick c-137 is by a mix of Chaotic Neutral and Neutral Good as he thinks his freedom is much above justice and law but doesn't mind helping friends with his own psychological and physical resources. Rick Prime is definitely Neutral evil tho.
@@ultragamer8816 Lawful??? Since when has Wade Wilson adhere to the law? I think he's more Neutral Good, he has good intentions but the legality of his actions depends on the time of day
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts True. But Vader simply followed orders of Palatine, he was basically a lawful neutral character without the moral dilemma and there were few instances that he used the law for HIS personal evil schemes. Palatine on the other hand constantly used the corrupt system to fulfill his goals and then controlled the law to his liking.
Palpatine is neutral evil as he doesn't really give a shit about neither law and order (lawful evil) nor does he care about chaos and freedom (chaotic evil) - he only cares about himself and HIS power.
@@PolishGod1234 but the means he used to gain that power would make him lawful evil since he used the republic and the empires rules and laws to fulfill his desires, in the current timeline the only thing that he did to make him neutral evil is his resistance to the arrest the Jedi tried to do.
Captain America during the Winter Soldier and especially Civil War is an example of a Lawful Good who is faced with the idea of questioning the established laws/higher power.
@@lorenzocassaro3054He doesn't have anything chaotic good about him, having doubts about the laws doesn't make you chaotic, especially when they are in conflict with the "good" thing, a chaotic good character wouldn't even have served the fucking United States
@@верховныйшаманy’all need to reconsider tha law, especially in America, where we have an idea of Democratic rights an’ decision makin. Tha entire point of tha title, ‘Civil War,’ implies that a law is bein put into place that more than half tha people it affects disagree wit, this is what causes civil war. Cap sticks to his laws, God’s law. To do right by people, an’ defend tha defenders. He is totally lawful good.
What I loved most of the video is that it not only vaguely tells you what the alignment is and one or two pop culture characters that generally reflect the alignment, but also presents examples of the usual challenges they might encounter, giving not only extra tools for character creation and narrative, but also making it more relatable.
Lawful good: Always tries to do the right thing, but might have an absolute mentality. Neutral good: Always tries to do the right thing but also understand life is morally grey. Chaotic good: Troublemakers with hearts of gold. Lawful neutral: A thug or even cop with the same mentality "I'm just doing my job, I do what I'm told." True neutral: I don't care 1 way or another, but I may help 1 side more than the other. Chaotic neutral: Anti-heroes. Lawful evil: Villains that have a code of honor. Neutral evil: Evil maybe even pure evil but has layers and standards. Chaotic evil: Psychopaths and monsters.
Easiest way to understand the moral compass is question of killing Good - no, I won't, it's bad! Neutral - well, I could, but do I need to? Evil - yeah, I'm fine with it *kills Lawful - ok, I kill, I go to jail Neutral - ok, I kill, but I could try to evade punishment Chaotic - ok, I kill, so what? I don't care if it's illegal here.
Not accurate in the strictest sense. Lawful to Chaotic just refers to how rigid a character's beliefs are. A chaotic character's beliefs are flexible, but their core ideals are the same as their lawful equivalent. A Chaotic Good character will kill if they feel like it's the morally correct thing to do (ie. A time traveler that goes back in time to kill Hitler is likely Chaotic Good. A Robin Hood type character is also Chaotic Good, targeting someone they perceive as evil to help people they see as innocent). In that vein, true neutral characters are the undecided or uninvolved people of a setting. They don't care about having codes or beliefs, and instead focus on simple existence. A lot of "intelligent beast" monsters have this alignment, aka creatures with an Intelligence above 4 but below 7. Beings that are intelligent enough to understand the basic concepts of a moral code if you try to explain them, but not enough to go above their instincts and care.
Being "lawful" isn't restriction what's actually in the law, but based on the character's principles. It's usually used to align with _the_ law, but it's not necessary. Being "Good" or "Evil" depends solely on the character's intentions. It's why you don't call a lion eating a person to be evil. It's also why you could have lawful good villains. People wanting to do good but have to do heinous things to do so. So long as they hold onto their established principles.
The last paragraph is just one of the many possible approaches to Lawful Evil. Good and Evil are not about intentions, but actions taken. One could have the best intentions on the world, but that wouldn't ever make his misdeeds any less bad. For instance, technically speaking, even Thanos would be Lawful Good by your metric and we all know how little sense it'd make to define him as such.
@@lorenzocassaro3054 I'm not sure where the confusion comes from. It's a morality alignment, not consequence alignment. You can only judge a character's morality based on their intentions. And the latter paragraph cannot be used for Lawful Evil because in order to be evil, you have to know better and still do evil things by definition. And yes, MCU Thanos is both Lawful Good and a Dumbass Braindead. Same with Injustice Superman. 🤷♂️ They did bad things, but both are still Lawful Good, technically.
So what exactly is true neutral. Like I do stuff and I don't care if they are good or bad and that makes me neutral I have a code, but sometimes a break it. Does that make me true neutral or lawful neutral that sometimes does something chaotic
@@martinnawalto5569 When you want to play a _neutral_ character, it's far easier to think of it as a spectrum, closer to its original function. Having a *_code_* you want to abide by already makes you lawful-aligned. Following it pushes you further. Breaking it makes you more chaotic-aligned. Find a careful balance of the two if you want a true-neutral character without making them wishy-washy.
Lawful good: "I'll help you, I'll make your bullies pay for what they've done, since they deserve it." Neutral good: "I'll help you, I'll show you how to stand up to your bullies, so they leave you alone." Chaotic good: "I'll help you, I'll threaten your bullies with a gun, they'll surely stop picking on you after that one."
Chaotic Good would probably join in for a fight, while Lawful would try to take the matter to the principal. Both of them would be willing to fight, but not all of them would resort to it with the same vehemence.
Lawful Evil: The Bully is the principal's son. Neutral Evil: "I have video of what your mom did last night, and I will upload it and you don't do my homework nerd." Chaotic Evil: 🎶All the other kids with the pumped-up kicks You better run, you better run, outrun my gun🎶
I have another example. Your best friend has a sister that you are attracted to. He makes you promise not to try and sleep with her: Lawful good: You don’t sleep with his sister because he is your best friend and respecting his wishes is the right thing to do. Neutral good: You made a promise to him and you are a person who keeps their promises. Therefore, you will not sleep with his sister even if she is attracted to you. Chaotic good: You will not try to sleep with his sister because you are going to sleep with his mom instead since he never said anything about her.
I am: Lawful Neutral because I strictly follow my promises, never break the conditions of deals, interested in order when it comes to work, follow the rules I create for others (if I do) Chaotic Neutral because I hate obeying, I avoid pointless restrictions, don't follow rules I don't agree with myself. Though True Neutral's description kinda doesn't fit me.
For those still confused, here's a simplification: *( Lawful Good )* ; Superman & Batman *( Neutral Good )* ; Spiderman & Prolly YOU irl *( Chaotic Good )* ; Either your Average Anti-Hero or an Heroic Anarchist (usually the second option). *( Lawful Neutral )* ; Either "Follow the order and authority for the sake of The Order, no matter what anyone else says", or "Follow your own moral code bcuz that's how you live life, no matter what anyone else says" *( True Neutral )* ; Either a Monk, an Mercenary, or a person that simply/just wanna survive without any moral bias in their life. *( Chaotic Neutral )* ; For BETTER or for WORSE, they're a "Free Spirit" *( Lawful Evil )* ; Either your average Anti-Villain or an total Manipulator (usually the second option). *( Neutral Evil )* ; A evilish selfish, but... also very practical guy! *( Chaotic Evil )* ; 👹 ... (EDIT): grammar fix dont worry 🍑
But most superheroes don't believe in the law, only the prison system. They force their own worldview because they believe the former was insufficient. I think a better example of lawful good is Captain atom from Batman v Superman.
@@blackhand441 I mean they do abide for the law stated by superman and batman themselves many times, and want to do good, so they are indeed lawful good
My cleric/monk of Fire started out Lawful Good and got so dissillusioned by the church that he turned Chaotic Good - bringing the poor back from the dead - when no one else cared.
I think that Robocop is more lawful good than lawful neutral. Despite the fact that he’s literally programmed to uphold the law, he has in some stories found ways to rebel against what was technically legal when he knew that it violated the spirit of the law and was morally wrong. Not surprising when he lives in a world where an amoral mega corporation owns the police.
Moral Alignment explained in a response of a situation consisting of a school bully picking on a victim Lawful Good : Tells an adult about the situation (Teacher, Principal, etc.) Neutral Good : Tries to stop the fight Chaotic Good : Fights against the bully, defending the victim Lawful Neutral : Bystander, but keeps the information incase of an elaboration in the situation True Neutral : Bystander Chaotic Neutral : Attracts other students on the situation Lawful Evil : Roots (Supports) for the Bully Neutral Evil : Makes fun of the victim (non-physically) Chaotic Evil : Joins in the bullying
He's neutral evil. He only cares about himself and his power, he's ready to break any law and order as long as It benefits him. He's a neutral evil who uses laws and order as It gives him more power.
@@PolishGod1234 but he never actually had to break the law to gain power, you could argue that he is a sith but due to the huge disappearance they had for a lot of years made the sith not illegal for republic and more of a religious matter that the Jedi were concerned, so the Jedi couldn't just bust in to the Senate and request for palpatine to be arrested for being a sith alone. So he used the laws of the republic to his advantage and later on as emperor he created the rules and laws. Besides have you even watched the video? The description of a lawful evil character fits palpatine more than Vader who had moments of straight up ignoring the emperor's orders.
@@PolishGod1234 the rule of 2 isn't an actual law or rule, it's a sith teaching out of the dozen . There's other sith teachings like the sith empire and rule of one and palpatine chose the latter and tried to enforce both of them in the end. He would follow the rule of two had Vader not become a burnt chicken in mustafar. So nope, he didn't break any actual law or rule and if we were to go by the logic of "broke rule =/=lawful character" Vader shouldn't even be mentioned since right after his surgery he attacked the emperor, which is illegal(🤯) .
@@ΓιώργοςΠαρασκευόπουλος-ω4τ Technically he conspired to create treason with Dooku. But it's only illegal if you get caught. Palpatine worked through the legal system and he never openly rebelled against it, making him Lawful Evil.
I am chaotic good because I don’t believe that laws and societal norms dictate what is right or wrong. I follow what I believe to be moral regardless of whether it conflicts with the law or societal expectations. People should follow what is right even if it doesn’t align with the law or what society as a whole believes to be moral. People also shouldn’t blindly follow rules or societal norms just because it’s what they’re used to. The law and societal norms are not absolute rules on how to live your life. They should be questioned and challenged by people to make sure that they actually make sense. And if they don’t hold up or make sense then they should be abolished.
@@cultofmelIt depends, lawfully good doesn't mean that you can't be compassionate or can't see through people who use law for their deeds,it means that you aren't going to play vigilante and kill someone since you abide by the law unlike the chaotic counterparts who only spread more death destruction.
1. Moral alignment is just the good-evil axis. The law-chaos axis is ethical alignment. 2. Lawful alignment doesn't necessarily mean the character cares about civil statutes, but rather order and discipline.
He doesn't destroy property (intentionally), he doesn't straight-up murc|er a bad-guy, or take a corrupted person hostage in the name of good. That would be chaotic, I think. Spider-Man's meant, I think, to be a rep of the common man, and I think Neutral Good fits the common man/woman most.
Brandon Lee's Eric Draven is a good definition of Chaotic Good. Sometimes, eliminating the threat is the only to achieve peace and safety to your own community
Tom Bombadil was actually probably around Lawful good and Chaotic good, since he saved the 4 hobbits from the barrow-wights (in the books, not the movies)
He makes good impressions on law enforcement entities, but he also has inner workings with crime rings, and he ends up killing off some people to up his power. He's not a good dude, he's just very willing to two-face his way around.
Me: True Neutral. My dogs: Chaotic good. My cat: Chaotic neutral. My wife: Neutral good. My son: Chaotic good. My best bro: Chaotic good. My father: Lawful neutral. My mother: Lawful good. My brother: Neutral good. My former drill sergeant: *literally has his own mortal alignment*
Im either a neutral good and a chaotic good. With a little moral code of "as long it doesn't hurt anyone. Mentally, physically or makes his job harder" would just ignore rules as long as ignoring them doesn't give problems to someone
This is pretty accurate, but being lawful good doesn’t always mean you adhere to every rule and law. You can be lawful good and adhere to your own moral compass instead of following strict societal rules.
@@PolishGod1234 I’d say he uses a lot of tactics and methods if lawful easy. His ability to work 3 different governments and their functions up to just usurping all them in one move was textbook
@@rennac3152 his methods are lawful evil, but he himself is definitely Neutral Evil, as he's doing It all for himself. Using the law is simply the most convenient for him.
Lawful doesn’t mean a character has to follow an established Law dictated by a government or society, that’s grossly constrictive. It just means that a character is orderly, consistent and/or plans ahead for the future.
@@Timebomb_19 If thats the case then why would Lawful exist? If neutrals act with the people and the environment around them in mind and chaotics act without regards to the people around them then what is lawful? Its not constrictive, we just live in society where laws have a major role in.
@@Blu-ps5rq you saying people can only have one dimension to them? You shouldn’t think so archetypically. Take the Joker for example, some people say he’s the embodiment of chaos, but he is human, and rarely that side of him shows. The Joker personality might be pure chaos, but he isn’t. You should make decisions based off of who your character is, not what their archetype is. Otherwise, wouldn’t every lawful good character in fiction be the exact same? Besides, Archetype is based off of your actions, it’s not something you’re born and locked into your whole life. You make Evil decisions, you become more Evil. That doesn’t mean you can’t do any Good.
@@Timebomb_19 ...wth are you talking about? We are talking about character alignments, not their character itself. Theres a reason why we call people villains, saints, heroes, and psychopaths. They are generalized in a category just like how genres categorized our favorite books. Alright so Joker is a deeper person that an isekai character but that does not mean that he cannot be described as a person who causes wide spread chaos and destruction for shits and giggles
As someone who read the original Spider-Man comic, I can say Spider-Man also fits the "Chaotic Good" category especially in the beginning of his journey where he was somehow rebellious and had his own ideas of what's good, I would say Spider-Man lies in the spectrum of "Neutral Good" and "Chaotic Good"
I like to imagine that Palpatine treads to Neutral Evil in a way. Vader is evil, but he also genuinely believes in law/order/code, he was the one offering Luke to join him because he genuinely believed in the benefits of this tyranny, because he cared, and he ended up choosing Luke in the end and betrayed Palpatine, hence Lawful Evil. Palpatine meanwhile is merely pure evil for his own evil ambitions, the reason the Empire exists is because he had violated and desecrated so many past laws and rebuilt it all to benefit his own.
Also while Vader seems to do most of the actual governing as the hand of palpatine by leading the troopers and commanding officers, palpatine just seems to enjoy his position as the emperor by relaxing in his throne room which shows how he only really cares about the personal comfort which his power offers him
You forgot about chaotic lawful. Basically making the most amount of chaos which using the rules like for useing loop hole or just following the rules like a smart ass It’s similar to law or evil, but the main objective is similar, but without order you don’t have one goal
These archetype definitions sound all fair and good, except for the context that we are observing each of these archetypes in a sterilized atmosphere of a character creation standpoint. Each establishment archetype can easily stem off and branch singularly or towards a specific archetype based on either bad roleplaying by the player, or storytelling bias by the dungeon master. Maybe there should be a sublimated archetype class in regards to the characters alignment archetype campusions based by archetype whether in a natural, ambitious or conflictive state. This could be an interesting way of further fleshing out the character archetypes, and subtlety communicating between the player and the DM the creative intent and overall development arch of a created introduced character?
I think i fit in lawful good, I'm all for doing good as much as possible but i recognize that in order for our World to have a future, there has to be order and limits. You cannot forgive every time just because someone is sorry. I follow the rules as long as they fit my conscience. To me if we don't have honor, dignity and respect we are no better than wild beasts. Everything is not about self benefit. Children look up to grown ups to set an example. If we can't at least do that, we don't deserve to be called adults. I will do all i can to save lives even if it goes against some law but i think our society needs order, order to protect children, women and old people if we want a future our ancestors risked their lives for would be proud to see. To show their sacrifice, these wars were not for nothing. Everyone has his own opinion and may not agree with me and it is fine, but this is how i decided to lead my life and i'm sure i'm not the only one.
This might be a bit of a stretch, *but what are the types of "other dimensional versions of characters" are there in fiction/media (not sure what the best/shortest words for that are)* think you might do a video on that some day? (I also love how the thumbnail has Jack Sparrow as Chaotic neutral, cause let's be honest, he's undeniably the top ten embodiments of "what the @#$% is he doing?😂")
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts Like different versions of a character, from personalities or qualities that make them different from the characters we the audience know, but still have a few similarities to let us know that they are technically (or at least WERE depending on the character's story arcs) the same character, just a different version. *Does that help?*
@@w1ndgeneral226 That would be an interesting hurdle to try to make into a video. I'll add it to my list of ideas then and In the future when I gathered enough, I can post a poll to see what the community would like to see!
Truthfully, Jack Sparrow would be more in the category of Chaotic Good once you know HOW it was that he got in so much trouble with the East India Trading Company in the first place. He certainly embraces chaos, though.
I would say that Neutral and Chaotic Evil have many of the same goals and motivations, but what separates them is that NE is capable of delayed gratification and that sometimes you need to do something annoying for a bigger payoff later. Basically, a modicum of self restraint and control.
You see a sign at the park that says “keep off the grass.” If you are an evil character, you are gonna walk on the grass. Lawful evil: Throw the sign away and walk on the grass. “Sign? I didn’t see a sign.” Neutral evil: Ignore the sign completely and walk on the grass anyways. “The sign is not the boss of me.” Chaotic evil: use a flamethrower to burn all the grass down to ash. “Can’t walk on the grass if there’s no grass left.”
Something that shows the ambiguity of the alignment chart is I’ve seen people label robin hopd as neutral good but also use Batman as an example of chaotic good
I think people can be a mix of some of these - like a sliding scale. I see some traits of mine in a few different alignments. I think people are a little less black and white.
Yup. This is an explanation of the old Dungeons & Dragons alignment system. Not a perfect system for role playing, but it was one of the first for modern times.
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts In a way yes but it’s not the same as being judged by human authority because judgement from God matters a lot more which is a good thing because he would never abuse his power. This is why idolizing people to the point where you basically worship them is a sin because if you worship authority, you put all of your trust in them, and not God.
I sit in “true neutral” as I move between “lawful neutral” “neutral good” chaotic neutral” and “chaotic good” More often than not, I exist in a super position of the 5 previous mentioned…
I'm struggling to find where i would fit in the most, but i guess it's between chaotic good, chaotic neutral and true neutral. Somewhere in that triangle.
The beauty of it is that you don't have to hard associate with one alignment. you can fall in between the spectrums but lean more towards a certain one. Like for example I would be based out of Chaotic good, but have some neutral evil tendancies.
Lawful good: iceland Lawful neutral: USA Lawful evil: north korea Neutral good: uk True neutral: brazil Neutral evil: russia Chaotic good: el salvador Chaotic neutral: israel Chaotic evil: somalia
Lawful Good: Eliminates the threat only if it's the right thing to do Lawful Neutral: Eliminates the threat only if it's the moral thing to do Lawful Chaotic: Eliminates the threat because it's the right thing to do Lawful Neutral: Eliminates the threat by consensus True Neutral: Doesn't get involved Chaotic Neutral: May or may not eliminate the threat Lawful Evil: Eliminates the threat to benefit them Neutral Evil: Eliminates the threat if it benefits them Chaotic Evil: Eliminates the threat for funsies
I think the funniest part about this entire video is the thumbnail, where Spider-Man is accusing Captain Jack Sparrow of something, who is vehemently defending himself by assuring Spider-Man he is lawful neutral, all while Palpatine looks on in amusement from the corner.
Someone explained this with shopping carts --
Lawful good: returns cart to inside store
Neutral good: leaves cart in parking lot but makes sure it's not blocking a space
Chaotic good: gives cart to someone just arriving
Lawful neutral: puts cart in that little corral in parking lot
True neutral: leaves cart wherever he finishes with it
Chaotic neutral: shoves cart in random direction and walks away
Lawful evil: puts cart in corral backwards so that it wastes space and makes the guy's job harder
Neutral evil: puts cart so that it blocks someone from pulling out or getting his door open
Chaotic evil: steals cart
I got neutral evil, and a lot of things of the description fits, but I do return the shopping carts, and i occasionally find myself hating the people who don't, unfortunately the majority.
I steal money from the cart
dang bro i'm true neutral.i just focus on getting out the store and going home
@SerbianSpark BRO HOW ARE YOU NOT IN JAIL FOR THIS?!💀
@@AshaMohamed-lv4trummmm, he's Serbian.
My dog is chaotic evil.
Chihuahua?
@@kkvv3699prolly
Chihuahua?? 😂
Definitely chihuahua
100% Chihuahua
Lawful does NOT necessarily mean following the Law but rather following a strict set of rules
Yea like the stormtroopers in star wars
Such as the Law? If it's personal rules then everybody is lawful. There is no such thing as a person who doesn't have personal rules.
@@PhialSubstance Well Batman and superman also i think have a code to not kill people and a neutral or chaotic would kill if it was convenient
@@PhialSubstanceyeah, but neutral and especially chaotic individuals are more than willing to go against their personal codes.
@@spider-saiyan0475 I don’t think so. If you would go against your personal code then it isn’t a personal code, because a personal code is something you would never go against. For instance, there are things I might be forced to do that go against my beliefs or my nature, but there are also things I would never do under any circumstances even if someone was trying to force me. Wherever you draw the line, that is your personal code.
Thanks, ChatGPT.
This
Yep.. we know it too well..
Fr
Chatgpt sure seems like a big fan of game of thrones
It's unfortunate that FlashBamg skipped over this, I think they can take some constructive criticism from this. When I use AI, I use it to help me learn how to do things instead of having it do something for me. AI is a great tool, bit it should be for working with people instead of for people imo. But, if they didn't use AI to make the video, then I guess this point doesn't matter in this context. It's still important to say this anyways.
. Lawful Neutral Chaotic
Good 🌹 💚 ⚡
Neutral 🧑⚖ 😐 💥
Evil 👁 👺 ☠
Chaotic Good is Nazi germany?
B-based?
70th like
🗿
@@AntarcticaMade Criminaly underrated comment
💚
Rick Sanchez would be chaotic neutral since he doesn't care about being lawful or evil but he is unpredictable by nature.
But there's some episodes where he acts 100 percent chaotic evil
Depends on which Rick you are talking about.
Rick c-137 is by a mix of Chaotic Neutral and Neutral Good as he thinks his freedom is much above justice and law but doesn't mind helping friends with his own psychological and physical resources.
Rick Prime is definitely Neutral evil tho.
Rick is Chaotic Pickle.
More like Chaotic Neutral.
He does good and bad things but you'll never know how or why he does it until he does
wubadubalubdub!
Surprised you didn't use Deadpool for chaotic neutral, he's like the face that alignment
So is Jack Sparrow.
@@w1ndgeneral226 I agree though, Deadpool would be a great candidate!
Dante
He’s more chaotic good though
@@ultragamer8816 Lawful??? Since when has Wade Wilson adhere to the law? I think he's more Neutral Good, he has good intentions but the legality of his actions depends on the time of day
I would argue that palpatine fills the lawful evil role more than vader. Because in the end Vader rebelled against him to save his son.
Sometimes characters and people do an alignment shift.
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts True. But Vader simply followed orders of Palatine, he was basically a lawful neutral character without the moral dilemma and there were few instances that he used the law for HIS personal evil schemes. Palatine on the other hand constantly used the corrupt system to fulfill his goals and then controlled the law to his liking.
Palpatine is neutral evil as he doesn't really give a shit about neither law and order (lawful evil) nor does he care about chaos and freedom (chaotic evil) - he only cares about himself and HIS power.
@@PolishGod1234 but the means he used to gain that power would make him lawful evil since he used the republic and the empires rules and laws to fulfill his desires, in the current timeline the only thing that he did to make him neutral evil is his resistance to the arrest the Jedi tried to do.
@@PolishGod1234 Even in the damn font of the video palpatine is quite literally put in lawful evil.
Captain America during the Winter Soldier and especially Civil War is an example of a Lawful Good who is faced with the idea of questioning the established laws/higher power.
*Chaotic Good
@@lorenzocassaro3054He doesn't have anything chaotic good about him, having doubts about the laws doesn't make you chaotic, especially when they are in conflict with the "good" thing, a chaotic good character wouldn't even have served the fucking United States
That sounds more like Neutral Good.
@@weepingkoopa2862 no
@@верховныйшаманy’all need to reconsider tha law, especially in America, where we have an idea of Democratic rights an’ decision makin.
Tha entire point of tha title, ‘Civil War,’ implies that a law is bein put into place that more than half tha people it affects disagree wit, this is what causes civil war.
Cap sticks to his laws, God’s law. To do right by people, an’ defend tha defenders. He is totally lawful good.
What I loved most of the video is that it not only vaguely tells you what the alignment is and one or two pop culture characters that generally reflect the alignment, but also presents examples of the usual challenges they might encounter, giving not only extra tools for character creation and narrative, but also making it more relatable.
Lawful good: Always tries to do the right thing, but might have an absolute mentality.
Neutral good: Always tries to do the right thing but also understand life is morally grey.
Chaotic good: Troublemakers with hearts of gold.
Lawful neutral: A thug or even cop with the same mentality "I'm just doing my job, I do what I'm told."
True neutral: I don't care 1 way or another, but I may help 1 side more than the other.
Chaotic neutral: Anti-heroes.
Lawful evil: Villains that have a code of honor.
Neutral evil: Evil maybe even pure evil but has layers and standards.
Chaotic evil: Psychopaths and monsters.
True neutral not lawful netireal cuz you can’t be lawful neutral
Lawful evil has one word that just screams this alignment: Tyrants.
Psychopaths are more NE.
@@SaevaKali Might depend on the psychopath.
Easiest way to understand the moral compass is question of killing
Good - no, I won't, it's bad!
Neutral - well, I could, but do I need to?
Evil - yeah, I'm fine with it *kills
Lawful - ok, I kill, I go to jail
Neutral - ok, I kill, but I could try to evade punishment
Chaotic - ok, I kill, so what? I don't care if it's illegal here.
Not accurate in the strictest sense. Lawful to Chaotic just refers to how rigid a character's beliefs are.
A chaotic character's beliefs are flexible, but their core ideals are the same as their lawful equivalent.
A Chaotic Good character will kill if they feel like it's the morally correct thing to do (ie. A time traveler that goes back in time to kill Hitler is likely Chaotic Good. A Robin Hood type character is also Chaotic Good, targeting someone they perceive as evil to help people they see as innocent).
In that vein, true neutral characters are the undecided or uninvolved people of a setting. They don't care about having codes or beliefs, and instead focus on simple existence.
A lot of "intelligent beast" monsters have this alignment, aka creatures with an Intelligence above 4 but below 7. Beings that are intelligent enough to understand the basic concepts of a moral code if you try to explain them, but not enough to go above their instincts and care.
Being "lawful" isn't restriction what's actually in the law, but based on the character's principles. It's usually used to align with _the_ law, but it's not necessary. Being "Good" or "Evil" depends solely on the character's intentions. It's why you don't call a lion eating a person to be evil.
It's also why you could have lawful good villains. People wanting to do good but have to do heinous things to do so. So long as they hold onto their established principles.
The last paragraph is just one of the many possible approaches to Lawful Evil.
Good and Evil are not about intentions, but actions taken. One could have the best intentions on the world, but that wouldn't ever make his misdeeds any less bad.
For instance, technically speaking, even Thanos would be Lawful Good by your metric and we all know how little sense it'd make to define him as such.
@@lorenzocassaro3054 I'm not sure where the confusion comes from. It's a morality alignment, not consequence alignment. You can only judge a character's morality based on their intentions. And the latter paragraph cannot be used for Lawful Evil because in order to be evil, you have to know better and still do evil things by definition.
And yes, MCU Thanos is both Lawful Good and a Dumbass Braindead. Same with Injustice Superman. 🤷♂️ They did bad things, but both are still Lawful Good, technically.
Yeah I think this video could've made that more clear
So what exactly is true neutral.
Like I do stuff and I don't care if they are good or bad and that makes me neutral
I have a code, but sometimes a break it.
Does that make me true neutral or lawful neutral that sometimes does something chaotic
@@martinnawalto5569 When you want to play a _neutral_ character, it's far easier to think of it as a spectrum, closer to its original function. Having a *_code_* you want to abide by already makes you lawful-aligned. Following it pushes you further. Breaking it makes you more chaotic-aligned. Find a careful balance of the two if you want a true-neutral character without making them wishy-washy.
Lawful good: "I'll help you, I'll make your bullies pay for what they've done, since they deserve it."
Neutral good: "I'll help you, I'll show you how to stand up to your bullies, so they leave you alone."
Chaotic good: "I'll help you, I'll threaten your bullies with a gun, they'll surely stop picking on you after that one."
Chaotic Good would probably join in for a fight, while Lawful would try to take the matter to the principal. Both of them would be willing to fight, but not all of them would resort to it with the same vehemence.
Chaotic evil: I’ll @##^]$$. ^]$.^${ ^{*,%!] ^{%^]€{**##]^*$ ^]^%\%]^{^~^^ %\%#^]{
Lawful Evil: The Bully is the principal's son.
Neutral Evil: "I have video of what your mom did last night, and I will upload it and you don't do my homework nerd."
Chaotic Evil: 🎶All the other kids with the pumped-up kicks You better run, you better run, outrun my gun🎶
I have another example. Your best friend has a sister that you are attracted to. He makes you promise not to try and sleep with her:
Lawful good: You don’t sleep with his sister because he is your best friend and respecting his wishes is the right thing to do.
Neutral good: You made a promise to him and you are a person who keeps their promises. Therefore, you will not sleep with his sister even if she is attracted to you.
Chaotic good: You will not try to sleep with his sister because you are going to sleep with his mom instead since he never said anything about her.
@@Judo593 Chaotic good is actually lawful evil this is what a lawful evil does manipulates rules to their advantage
I am:
Lawful Neutral because I strictly follow my promises, never break the conditions of deals, interested in order when it comes to work, follow the rules I create for others (if I do)
Chaotic Neutral because I hate obeying, I avoid pointless restrictions, don't follow rules I don't agree with myself.
Though True Neutral's description kinda doesn't fit me.
This just sounds like Neutral Good to me lol
@@cultofmel I make too much offensive jokes about everyone to be neutral good
Alternate title:
Every Shadow the Hedgehog ‘05 Path explained in real life
For those still confused, here's a simplification:
*( Lawful Good )* ; Superman & Batman
*( Neutral Good )* ; Spiderman & Prolly YOU irl
*( Chaotic Good )* ; Either your Average Anti-Hero or an Heroic Anarchist (usually the second option).
*( Lawful Neutral )* ; Either "Follow the order and authority for the sake of The Order, no matter what anyone else says", or "Follow your own moral code bcuz that's how you live life, no matter what anyone else says"
*( True Neutral )* ; Either a Monk, an Mercenary, or a person that simply/just wanna survive without any moral bias in their life.
*( Chaotic Neutral )* ; For BETTER or for WORSE, they're a "Free Spirit"
*( Lawful Evil )* ; Either your average Anti-Villain or an total Manipulator (usually the second option).
*( Neutral Evil )* ; A evilish selfish, but... also very practical guy!
*( Chaotic Evil )* ; 👹 ...
(EDIT): grammar fix dont worry 🍑
But most superheroes don't believe in the law, only the prison system. They force their own worldview because they believe the former was insufficient. I think a better example of lawful good is Captain atom from Batman v Superman.
@@blackhand441 I mean they do abide for the law stated by superman and batman themselves many times, and want to do good, so they are indeed lawful good
Chaotic Good is literally Sonic, the description of what Chaotic Good means is his entire character.
@@Kelps.mp4 This is mostly bcuz hes been a inconsistent char in the past decade if u think abt it
@@wander7812 From Chaotic Good to Neutral Good in a change of writers.
I'm a solid chaotic good at heart. ⚡
same
Same
I'm chaotic good half the time and chaotic neutral the other
ngl im chaotic evil, i will do anything if its gonna be funny
Judge Claude Frollo definitely fits the lawful evil side, since that's basically his whole character trait.
Finally someone actually says this
My cleric/monk of Fire started out Lawful Good and got so dissillusioned by the church that he turned Chaotic Good - bringing the poor back from the dead - when no one else cared.
Are you talking about your character from a video game, if so, what game is it
Probably DnD?
Sounds like dnd, also sounds like a good character arc too.
2:53 UNFORESEN CONSEQUENCES!??!?!?!!
LALF HIVE REFERENCE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOMAGA
Ah yes my favorite game LALF HIVE
THE RIGHT MAN IN THE WRONG PLACE CAN MAKE ALL THE DIF FERENCE IN THE WORLD!1!!1!1!!1!1 🗣️ 🔥
B-MAN 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶 BORDON BREEMAN 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶 BARNEY BOULDER 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶
RISE AND SHINE, MR FREEMAN. RISE AND SHINE...
I think that Robocop is more lawful good than lawful neutral.
Despite the fact that he’s literally programmed to uphold the law, he has in some stories found ways to rebel against what was technically legal when he knew that it violated the spirit of the law and was morally wrong. Not surprising when he lives in a world where an amoral mega corporation owns the police.
Moral Alignment explained in a response of a situation consisting of a school bully picking on a victim
Lawful Good : Tells an adult about the situation (Teacher, Principal, etc.)
Neutral Good : Tries to stop the fight
Chaotic Good : Fights against the bully, defending the victim
Lawful Neutral : Bystander, but keeps the information incase of an elaboration in the situation
True Neutral : Bystander
Chaotic Neutral : Attracts other students on the situation
Lawful Evil : Roots (Supports) for the Bully
Neutral Evil : Makes fun of the victim (non-physically)
Chaotic Evil : Joins in the bullying
Me in storyline games: neutral good
In strategy games: true neutral
games where I'm unstoppable: chaotic evil
😂😂😂
Im chaotic good, also i have to use 70% of my urge to not become a murderer
If I were an alignment, I'd fluctuate between neutral good on my best days, chaotic neutral at my worst, and chaotic good on average
Sidious on the thumbnail cracked me up, cuz its soooo accurate for him to be lawful evil.
Lol I started war in replies😂
He's neutral evil.
He only cares about himself and his power, he's ready to break any law and order as long as It benefits him.
He's a neutral evil who uses laws and order as It gives him more power.
@@PolishGod1234 but he never actually had to break the law to gain power, you could argue that he is a sith but due to the huge disappearance they had for a lot of years made the sith not illegal for republic and more of a religious matter that the Jedi were concerned, so the Jedi couldn't just bust in to the Senate and request for palpatine to be arrested for being a sith alone. So he used the laws of the republic to his advantage and later on as emperor he created the rules and laws. Besides have you even watched the video? The description of a lawful evil character fits palpatine more than Vader who had moments of straight up ignoring the emperor's orders.
@@ΓιώργοςΠαρασκευόπουλος-ω4τ He actually acted against "the rule of 2" as HE wanted the power, and all his apprendices were just minions.
@@PolishGod1234 the rule of 2 isn't an actual law or rule, it's a sith teaching out of the dozen . There's other sith teachings like the sith empire and rule of one and palpatine chose the latter and tried to enforce both of them in the end. He would follow the rule of two had Vader not become a burnt chicken in mustafar. So nope, he didn't break any actual law or rule and if we were to go by the logic of "broke rule =/=lawful character" Vader shouldn't even be mentioned since right after his surgery he attacked the emperor, which is illegal(🤯) .
@@ΓιώργοςΠαρασκευόπουλος-ω4τ Technically he conspired to create treason with Dooku.
But it's only illegal if you get caught. Palpatine worked through the legal system and he never openly rebelled against it, making him Lawful Evil.
I'm probably chaotic neutral or neutral evil irl but in video games I'm chaotic evil.
7:52 chaos =/= anarchism
@@Lucasjj2010 Anarchy ≠ Anarchism
AWOOO 🌕 🐺 ⚡️
How bro felt after he posted this:😈🥶😤🐺👹💀😈🐺
Edgy
I am chaotic good because I don’t believe that laws and societal norms dictate what is right or wrong. I follow what I believe to be moral regardless of whether it conflicts with the law or societal expectations. People should follow what is right even if it doesn’t align with the law or what society as a whole believes to be moral. People also shouldn’t blindly follow rules or societal norms just because it’s what they’re used to. The law and societal norms are not absolute rules on how to live your life. They should be questioned and challenged by people to make sure that they actually make sense. And if they don’t hold up or make sense then they should be abolished.
I like bananas
Being lawful basically just means you're not open-minded and can't critically think very well imo
I like mangos
@@CatimixtoI like you
@@cultofmelIt depends, lawfully good doesn't mean that you can't be compassionate or can't see through people who use law for their deeds,it means that you aren't going to play vigilante and kill someone since you abide by the law unlike the chaotic counterparts who only spread more death destruction.
Always a Chaotic Neutral Bard main. Funny that you chose Jack Sparrow for the thumbnail. That’s a good summation
I absolutely love how the video seamlessly moves from the thumbnail. It just feels UGH, nice 👌
Glad you like it!
1. Moral alignment is just the good-evil axis. The law-chaos axis is ethical alignment.
2. Lawful alignment doesn't necessarily mean the character cares about civil statutes, but rather order and discipline.
Patrick Jane is definitely chaotic good
After watching this video, I realized I’m more chaotic good than anything. The worst I would probably be is chaotic neutral.
im chaotic bricked after this video! 🗣️❗❗❗💯💯💯💯
Same but without the chaotic
I find myself fluctuating between the lawful and chaotic good on certain things
I'd argue Spiderman is closer to Chaotic Good than Neutral Good. He's a vigilante, and most of what he does doesn't abide by the law.
"With great power comes great responsibility"
*Spider-Man leaves the scene with destruction and webs instead of cleaning up the mess*
He doesn't destroy property (intentionally), he doesn't straight-up murc|er a bad-guy, or take a corrupted person hostage in the name of good. That would be chaotic, I think.
Spider-Man's meant, I think, to be a rep of the common man, and I think Neutral Good fits the common man/woman most.
These type of videos are great for learning something really quickly
IRL I’m usually neutral or chaotic good but in video games my favorite alignment to play is lawful evil.
That is the beauty of video games where you can have an outlet to live a phantasy and take a break from reality!
Brandon Lee's Eric Draven is a good definition of Chaotic Good. Sometimes, eliminating the threat is the only to achieve peace and safety to your own community
Tom Bombadil was actually probably around Lawful good and Chaotic good, since he saved the 4 hobbits from the barrow-wights (in the books, not the movies)
my personalities of
chaotic good and chaotic neutral is a hard fought battle
Gus Fring as a "perfect neutral evil character"...really?
Walt fits better in that alignment or Todd
He makes good impressions on law enforcement entities, but he also has inner workings with crime rings, and he ends up killing off some people to up his power. He's not a good dude, he's just very willing to two-face his way around.
@@PolishGod1234 Walt is chaotic evil
@@michaelkopriva4131 someone who enjoys ultimate freedom and does whatever the Hell they want
what else is he?
Now that I understand this allignment system more. This means I'm Lawful Good when I was a kid, then shift to "True Neutral" as an adult.
Most of us tend to balance out as we get older.
Saw Gerrera is an example of a chaotic good character
I like how chaotic neutral is Sparrow
Me: True Neutral.
My dogs: Chaotic good.
My cat: Chaotic neutral.
My wife: Neutral good.
My son: Chaotic good.
My best bro: Chaotic good.
My father: Lawful neutral.
My mother: Lawful good.
My brother: Neutral good.
My former drill sergeant: *literally has his own mortal alignment*
Reject society, become a chaotic evil gremlin who eats the green part of the watermelon!
Im either a neutral good and a chaotic good. With a little moral code of "as long it doesn't hurt anyone. Mentally, physically or makes his job harder" would just ignore rules as long as ignoring them doesn't give problems to someone
Yea like stealing candy from a store ain’t gonna hurt nobody its a multi million dollar bussines anyway
EXACTLY! you get It Man Its not doing anything. A single dollar gum Is nothing to worker or the bussines
Switzerland all is the perfect True Neutral character.
This is pretty accurate, but being lawful good doesn’t always mean you adhere to every rule and law. You can be lawful good and adhere to your own moral compass instead of following strict societal rules.
I think I bounce between Neutral Good, Chaotic Good, True Neutral and Chaotic Neutral as the situation, and my mood, dictates.
I would say Emperor Palpatine and Louis Bloom are the personification of Neutral Evil
Finaly someone gets It.
Palpatine is NOT lawful evil.
@@PolishGod1234 I’d say he uses a lot of tactics and methods if lawful easy. His ability to work 3 different governments and their functions up to just usurping all them in one move was textbook
@@rennac3152 his methods are lawful evil, but he himself is definitely Neutral Evil, as he's doing It all for himself. Using the law is simply the most convenient for him.
Chaotic good example: the punisher
Thanks, Stuart.
I'm chaotic evil and I'm not a monster or psychopath, i just do what i need and want at first
Lawful doesn’t mean a character has to follow an established Law dictated by a government or society, that’s grossly constrictive. It just means that a character is orderly, consistent and/or plans ahead for the future.
Im pretty sure neutrals and chaotics can still have those traits tho.
@@Blu-ps5rq of course, but a chaotic character who has a code is less chaotic then one who doesn’t.
@@Timebomb_19 If thats the case then why would Lawful exist? If neutrals act with the people and the environment around them in mind and chaotics act without regards to the people around them then what is lawful? Its not constrictive, we just live in society where laws have a major role in.
@@Blu-ps5rq you saying people can only have one dimension to them? You shouldn’t think so archetypically. Take the Joker for example, some people say he’s the embodiment of chaos, but he is human, and rarely that side of him shows. The Joker personality might be pure chaos, but he isn’t.
You should make decisions based off of who your character is, not what their archetype is. Otherwise, wouldn’t every lawful good character in fiction be the exact same? Besides, Archetype is based off of your actions, it’s not something you’re born and locked into your whole life. You make Evil decisions, you become more Evil. That doesn’t mean you can’t do any Good.
@@Timebomb_19 ...wth are you talking about? We are talking about character alignments, not their character itself. Theres a reason why we call people villains, saints, heroes, and psychopaths. They are generalized in a category just like how genres categorized our favorite books. Alright so Joker is a deeper person that an isekai character but that does not mean that he cannot be described as a person who causes wide spread chaos and destruction for shits and giggles
Welp I always knew I was a chaotic neutral.
6:18 That picture is of Tyland Lannister, not Tywin Lannister.
I think it’s on purpose, in HOTD someone mispronounces Tylands name and calls him Tywin
As someone who read the original Spider-Man comic, I can say Spider-Man also fits the "Chaotic Good" category especially in the beginning of his journey where he was somehow rebellious and had his own ideas of what's good, I would say Spider-Man lies in the spectrum of "Neutral Good" and "Chaotic Good"
I would agree, but more so defaulted at neutral, leaning towards chaotic
I like to imagine that Palpatine treads to Neutral Evil in a way. Vader is evil, but he also genuinely believes in law/order/code, he was the one offering Luke to join him because he genuinely believed in the benefits of this tyranny, because he cared, and he ended up choosing Luke in the end and betrayed Palpatine, hence Lawful Evil. Palpatine meanwhile is merely pure evil for his own evil ambitions, the reason the Empire exists is because he had violated and desecrated so many past laws and rebuilt it all to benefit his own.
Also while Vader seems to do most of the actual governing as the hand of palpatine by leading the troopers and commanding officers, palpatine just seems to enjoy his position as the emperor by relaxing in his throne room which shows how he only really cares about the personal comfort which his power offers him
truth be told, chaotic good sounds like someone being pure in heart ngl
Pure in what they believe in.
You forgot about chaotic lawful. Basically making the most amount of chaos which using the rules like for useing loop hole or just following the rules like a smart ass
It’s similar to law or evil, but the main objective is similar, but without order you don’t have one goal
Basically the Elitists and Globalists of our world.
Saul Goodman
These archetype definitions sound all fair and good, except for the context that we are observing each of these archetypes in a sterilized atmosphere of a character creation standpoint. Each establishment archetype can easily stem off and branch singularly or towards a specific archetype based on either bad roleplaying by the player, or storytelling bias by the dungeon master.
Maybe there should be a sublimated archetype class in regards to the characters alignment archetype campusions based by archetype whether in a natural, ambitious or conflictive state.
This could be an interesting way of further fleshing out the character archetypes, and subtlety communicating between the player and the DM the creative intent and overall development arch of a created introduced character?
We all know that Stan Lee should have made it in true neutral
Why?
Slander
I kinda love how Jack sparrow is chaotic natural
Neutral good, "Kindness is the ultimate goal". Fax
I think i fit in lawful good, I'm all for doing good as much as possible but i recognize that in order for our World to have a future, there has to be order and limits. You cannot forgive every time just because someone is sorry. I follow the rules as long as they fit my conscience. To me if we don't have honor, dignity and respect we are no better than wild beasts. Everything is not about self benefit. Children look up to grown ups to set an example. If we can't at least do that, we don't deserve to be called adults. I will do all i can to save lives even if it goes against some law but i think our society needs order, order to protect children, women and old people if we want a future our ancestors risked their lives for would be proud to see. To show their sacrifice, these wars were not for nothing. Everyone has his own opinion and may not agree with me and it is fine, but this is how i decided to lead my life and i'm sure i'm not the only one.
This might be a bit of a stretch, *but what are the types of "other dimensional versions of characters" are there in fiction/media (not sure what the best/shortest words for that are)* think you might do a video on that some day?
(I also love how the thumbnail has Jack Sparrow as Chaotic neutral, cause let's be honest, he's undeniably the top ten embodiments of "what the @#$% is he doing?😂")
Could you elaborate a bit more on "other dimensional versions of character?"
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts
Like different versions of a character, from personalities or qualities that make them different from the characters we the audience know, but still have a few similarities to let us know that they are technically (or at least WERE depending on the character's story arcs) the same character, just a different version.
*Does that help?*
@@w1ndgeneral226 Like when characters undergo a change due to some traumatic event? or like an alternate universe scenario?
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts
Alternate universe.
@@w1ndgeneral226 That would be an interesting hurdle to try to make into a video. I'll add it to my list of ideas then and In the future when I gathered enough, I can post a poll to see what the community would like to see!
Bro, I'm literal chaotic good
Law full good: conservative
Neutral good: nondenominational
Chaotic good: liberal
conservative is lawful neutral and liberal is chaotic neutral
Truthfully, Jack Sparrow would be more in the category of Chaotic Good once you know HOW it was that he got in so much trouble with the East India Trading Company in the first place. He certainly embraces chaos, though.
lawful? More like "waffle"
Usually i am chaotic neutral,when i play worldbox i am chaotic evil and when i am at school i am chaotic good and teachers are lawful/neutral evil.
Im doing it for the vine
Chaotic neutral tomfoolery
I would say that Neutral and Chaotic Evil have many of the same goals and motivations, but what separates them is that NE is capable of delayed gratification and that sometimes you need to do something annoying for a bigger payoff later. Basically, a modicum of self restraint and control.
3:25 POLAND MENTIONED!!!!! 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱
Piwo blyat🥵
"Side? I am on Nobody's side! Because nobody is on my side"
Chaotic neutral>>>>
Chaotic evil do not work to create anarchy...they create chaos. Day and night.
You see a sign at the park that says “keep off the grass.” If you are an evil character, you are gonna walk on the grass.
Lawful evil: Throw the sign away and walk on the grass. “Sign? I didn’t see a sign.”
Neutral evil: Ignore the sign completely and walk on the grass anyways. “The sign is not the boss of me.”
Chaotic evil: use a flamethrower to burn all the grass down to ash. “Can’t walk on the grass if there’s no grass left.”
I'm pretty sure the Chaotic Evil guy would make sure to step in every single blade of grass, and only then use the flamethrower
Dave Matthew's arc is starting at lawful good then slowly moving towards chaotic evil
Batman is chaotic good
You'd make the argument for lawful good, with how strict he is with his code and anything
i think that he is lawful good because if he was chaotic good he would have killed the joker a long time ago
More neutral good, he respects the law but he will break it if necessary
Rick sanchez and deadpool are the literal definition of chaotic neutral.
Yeah, and this why I view the wikis, Heroes Wiki, Villains Wiki, and Neutral Characters Wiki.
Something that shows the ambiguity of the alignment chart is I’ve seen people label robin hopd as neutral good but also use Batman as an example of chaotic good
I’m so lawful evil I wear it as a shirt.
What did you do that makes you evil?
@@kozhcaelum8495 Ny World view in general.
Being open about using loopholes to make orphans be the first to charge into battle.
@@yates667 but will you really do that if given the chance?
@@kozhcaelum8495 I’ve never been given the chance.
@@yates667Kinda dangerous to have someone like you around if you really are like that🤨
I think people can be a mix of some of these - like a sliding scale. I see some traits of mine in a few different alignments. I think people are a little less black and white.
Yup. This is an explanation of the old Dungeons & Dragons alignment system. Not a perfect system for role playing, but it was one of the first for modern times.
I would that i am between true neutral and chaotic neutral
Would’ve been funny if for lawful evil he said “Darth Vader and my stepdad”
Lawful evil over here 😂
you care about all people equally, as yourself, FEELS high self esteem actually.
I’m chaotic good. I believe judgement by authority or legislation is meaningless because only God can judge me.
Would judgement from God be from a position of Authority?
@@OfficialFlashBangFacts In a way yes but it’s not the same as being judged by human authority because judgement from God matters a lot more which is a good thing because he would never abuse his power. This is why idolizing people to the point where you basically worship them is a sin because if you worship authority, you put all of your trust in them, and not God.
@@LobotomizeCommies10 somehow that seems both lawful good and chaotic good to me.
I sit in “true neutral” as I move between “lawful neutral” “neutral good” chaotic neutral” and “chaotic good”
More often than not, I exist in a super position of the 5 previous mentioned…
So i'm Chaotic Good
I'm struggling to find where i would fit in the most, but i guess it's between chaotic good, chaotic neutral and true neutral.
Somewhere in that triangle.
The beauty of it is that you don't have to hard associate with one alignment. you can fall in between the spectrums but lean more towards a certain one. Like for example I would be based out of Chaotic good, but have some neutral evil tendancies.
Lawful good: iceland
Lawful neutral: USA
Lawful evil: north korea
Neutral good: uk
True neutral: brazil
Neutral evil: russia
Chaotic good: el salvador
Chaotic neutral: israel
Chaotic evil: somalia
I don't understand how the UK is Neutral Good. What exactly is morally good about them?
@Orange_Swirl even with the Crisis it has an almost average everything
Lawful Good: Eliminates the threat only if it's the right thing to do
Lawful Neutral: Eliminates the threat only if it's the moral thing to do
Lawful Chaotic: Eliminates the threat because it's the right thing to do
Lawful Neutral: Eliminates the threat by consensus
True Neutral: Doesn't get involved
Chaotic Neutral: May or may not eliminate the threat
Lawful Evil: Eliminates the threat to benefit them
Neutral Evil: Eliminates the threat if it benefits them
Chaotic Evil: Eliminates the threat for funsies
3:15 the definition of woke is doing thing by law not moral and not only law also political correctness
The absence of Logic.
I think the funniest part about this entire video is the thumbnail, where Spider-Man is accusing Captain Jack Sparrow of something, who is vehemently defending himself by assuring Spider-Man he is lawful neutral, all while Palpatine looks on in amusement from the corner.