Great tip on laying out the bag. Thank you. Enjoyed your video. What's funny is that I have same camera bag you showed at the beginning of your video and now I've purchase 450 AWII.
Just got this bag today! Looks really good so far and it fits my camera attached to my Canon RF 100-500 lens with an extender mounted to it, which was my exact need. My otherwise very excellent Peak Design Everyday Backpack 30L does the job most of the time, but didn’t have enough for my birding combo.
Cheers, am in the backpack choosing nightmare. This made the list and is one of few you can buy atm. Nice to see it does the job. Hope its carry on cool that all but depends maybe on the airline.
A more important question is, can you fly with this backpack? Do Australian airlines permit this backpack as Carry On as it appears to be much bigger than allowed.
I went for this bag today after watching loads of TH-cam reviews, it was a choice of either the lowpro 350 or 450 or the gitzo 35l. I went to my local camera store to see it in real life and put a couple of big lenses in them. The Gitzo was a great bag and had more interior padding and a nice area to store cloths or stuff in a roll top which nearly swayed me but the 45L was too big and the 35L to small, even the store owner was pushing me to go with that one. But in the end I went with the Lowpro because it just seemed to fit my lenses better and had the side and top access as well as the back. I have a Sigma 600mm in the centre accessible from the top with camera body attached, I have a 70-200 in the side which I can access easily with the side door, also a 24-70 and a macro 100mm and still room for other stuff. The tactical part is great to attach things to with straps or hook type things and can put a gimble on it with monopod too. Yes with all that stuff its dam heavy but manageable if I need all that gear. Can only be lighter if not taking so much anyway. Drinks holder is great rather than stuffing it in a tight pocket like on others too. Really pleased with my purchase overall and it dosnt feel to big unlike the gitzo 45L which I would of gone for if I only when trekking with it, The low pro is better if you use it for both event stuff or wildlife and your not going to keep knocking people over as its quite low profile considering how much you can put in it.
@@davepastern I would say yes but not with body attached but I don’t own one so couldn’t say definitely best bet is take your gear to a store and try it out that’s what I did
@@davepastern yea it fits perfectly with a canon 80d attached to a sigma 100-600 contemporary and room for another section underneath. It’s an Awsome bag and why I went for it
good job, I just got mine and now trying to figure out where to put everything so its now to overweight, lol but overall I just love it, finally im happy after my 3rd purchase of camera bags, I have my R6 mounted with sigma 150-600c still mounted on the R6 and my Rf800 f/11 going across the bottom along with a 24-70 for landscapes and both ef & rf 1.4 convertors etc etc not to install the tripod on the side, just love this amazing bag
Hi - Sorry to bother you, I can see it fits your Sigma 150-600mm lens, does that also include the lens hood, will it also fit Tamron 18-300mm and 2 x Canon 77D cameras. Many thanks
I bought this recently after watching the video. Thanks Andy. Now, airline carry-on question: does this fit the airlines’ size requirements? No one had any issues getting it on board?
Sorry mate - I don't know. Haven't flown anywhere since I got the bag. I've got a feeling it'll be fine, but if you know otherwise, let me know because I'm off to Europe in the middle of the year :)
Thanks Andy. Off to New York in July then to the UK in Sept. guess I’ll find out at the gate. Qantas though, doesn’t instil me with confidence in either me or my luggage getting to my destination. I’m judging taking the camera, a 70-200 and 24-70 lenses in it along with the usual crap that one takes into the cabin.
@@Andyhutchinson today I packed the backpack with my gear. Canon R6, Canon EF70-200L f2.8, Tamron 24-70 and the iPad Pro 12.9. Total weight 7.01kg. Carry-on limit is 7kg, I think. Will have to reassess how or what I take with me as I still need to pack in meds, documentation, chargers. Maybe leave the 70-200 at home, but I want that for shooting grandkids' sports whilst in the US. Bag itself doesn't weigh all that much and is perfect for travel once you've rearranged the dividers.
Serious question re; rear access? Why was this an important criteria? Front access means not having to take it off. Eg in the check-in line and you need something from it. Your partner could get it out for you. One example, in any case.
love the pro tactic after watching hundreds of youtube videos myself. I do like the Shimado V2 but priced out of reach, trying to determine if I need the 350 or 450 thanks for the video
I have the same bag, bought it May 2020 and absolutely love it for all the reasons you've given. The biggest drawback however, and the only reason I'm awaiting delivery of the Whistler 450 AW II, is the simple issue of not having any real space for clothing or jackets etc. I have bags I attach to the outside but this becomes quite cumbersome. The Whistler will hopefully solve this problem for me. Otherwise the ProTactic 450 AW II is still a brilliant bag. ~ Hew
Thanks Hew - great to hear that you still like it after a year. If I was a bit more active and did longer hikes I'd probably be thinking along the same lines - I did like the look of the Whistler!
That is so funny, I did the same thing back in 2019/2020. BH Photo had a crazy Black Friday sale on the ProTactic so I got it. But it was too small to hold all of my other crap that I take on my sunrise and sunset shots (gardening knee pad, jackets, head lamps, flash lights, Go Pro and its accessories, and trekking pole etc.) So, I got the Whistler too. I love that bag! But I am going on a safari and since I do not need to hike and will be in a car, I have brought the ProTactic out of storage and started watching videos on how to pack it 🙂 I am so happy I wasn't the only one that did this.
Great tip on laying out the bag. Thank you. Enjoyed your video. What's funny is that I have same camera bag you showed at the beginning of your video and now I've purchase 450 AWII.
lol - that old bag did me okay - very glad I have the 450 now though. I'm sure you'll find it as practical as I do. :)
Just got this bag today! Looks really good so far and it fits my camera attached to my Canon RF 100-500 lens with an extender mounted to it, which was my exact need. My otherwise very excellent Peak Design Everyday Backpack 30L does the job most of the time, but didn’t have enough for my birding combo.
It's definitely got the room to accomodate those big lenses! :)
Andy, Great video. Thank you.
Thanks mate :)
Cheers, am in the backpack choosing nightmare. This made the list and is one of few you can buy atm. Nice to see it does the job. Hope its carry on cool that all but depends maybe on the airline.
Cheers Titch - not sure about the Carry On sizing. I suspect it probably does meet the requirements.
A more important question is, can you fly with this backpack? Do Australian airlines permit this backpack as Carry On as it appears to be much bigger than allowed.
Not sure sorry. Someone else in the comments had the same question, but I haven't flown anywhere since covid and so I'm not sure.
I went for this bag today after watching loads of TH-cam reviews, it was a choice of either the lowpro 350 or 450 or the gitzo 35l. I went to my local camera store to see it in real life and put a couple of big lenses in them. The Gitzo was a great bag and had more interior padding and a nice area to store cloths or stuff in a roll top which nearly swayed me but the 45L was too big and the 35L to small, even the store owner was pushing me to go with that one. But in the end I went with the Lowpro because it just seemed to fit my lenses better and had the side and top access as well as the back. I have a Sigma 600mm in the centre accessible from the top with camera body attached, I have a 70-200 in the side which I can access easily with the side door, also a 24-70 and a macro 100mm and still room for other stuff. The tactical part is great to attach things to with straps or hook type things and can put a gimble on it with monopod too. Yes with all that stuff its dam heavy but manageable if I need all that gear. Can only be lighter if not taking so much anyway. Drinks holder is great rather than stuffing it in a tight pocket like on others too. Really pleased with my purchase overall and it dosnt feel to big unlike the gitzo 45L which I would of gone for if I only when trekking with it, The low pro is better if you use it for both event stuff or wildlife and your not going to keep knocking people over as its quite low profile considering how much you can put in it.
Yea that sums it up for me too - it's just a great practical bag - no-nonsense utility. :)
this will fit a 500mm f4 IS L (mark 1)?
@@davepastern I would say yes but not with body attached but I don’t own one so couldn’t say definitely best bet is take your gear to a store and try it out that’s what I did
@@darrenrowley5646 Don't have the bag yet, don't have the 500mm f4 yet. Was just surprised that your 600m fits!
@@davepastern yea it fits perfectly with a canon 80d attached to a sigma 100-600 contemporary and room for another section underneath. It’s an Awsome bag and why I went for it
Great review. No messing about and down to earth, with good tips. I also believe that the fact it is still available means something too.
Thanks Steve - appreciate it.
@@Andyhutchinson Bought mine 2 days ago and absolutely love it. :P
good job, I just got mine and now trying to figure out where to put everything so its now to overweight, lol but overall I just love it, finally im happy after my 3rd purchase of camera bags, I have my R6 mounted with sigma 150-600c still mounted on the R6 and my Rf800 f/11 going across the bottom along with a 24-70 for landscapes and both ef & rf 1.4 convertors etc etc not to install the tripod on the side, just love this amazing bag
Honestly the best camera backpack I've owned in a decade. Still super happy with my purchase. :)
Hi - Sorry to bother you, I can see it fits your Sigma 150-600mm lens, does that also include the lens hood, will it also fit Tamron 18-300mm and 2 x Canon 77D cameras. Many thanks
I bought this recently after watching the video. Thanks Andy. Now, airline carry-on question: does this fit the airlines’ size requirements? No one had any issues getting it on board?
Sorry mate - I don't know. Haven't flown anywhere since I got the bag. I've got a feeling it'll be fine, but if you know otherwise, let me know because I'm off to Europe in the middle of the year :)
Thanks Andy. Off to New York in July then to the UK in Sept. guess I’ll find out at the gate. Qantas though, doesn’t instil me with confidence in either me or my luggage getting to my destination. I’m judging taking the camera, a 70-200 and 24-70 lenses in it along with the usual crap that one takes into the cabin.
@@Andyhutchinson today I packed the backpack with my gear. Canon R6, Canon EF70-200L f2.8, Tamron 24-70 and the iPad Pro 12.9. Total weight 7.01kg. Carry-on limit is 7kg, I think. Will have to reassess how or what I take with me as I still need to pack in meds, documentation, chargers. Maybe leave the 70-200 at home, but I want that for shooting grandkids' sports whilst in the US. Bag itself doesn't weigh all that much and is perfect for travel once you've rearranged the dividers.
Really, really, really... really good review Sir✌✌ thanks for that!
My pleasure!
Loved your review. I have mine on the way!
Wise decision, sir!
@@Andyhutchinson I just realised you're on the NSW Sth Coast - Moruya / Bodalla area is a personal favourite. I'll check out more of your channels!
Will this bag fit a Sigma 150-600mm lens with hood, Tamron 18-300mm and 2 x Canon 77D cameras
It's a very large bag and I suspect it would but I cannot confirm it.
2:27 mins in.
Sorry... let me get this straight... your requirement is: "bigger rear access"
Right... noted.
x
lol - I think we can all agree that rear access is crucial ;)
Serious question re; rear access? Why was this an important criteria? Front access means not having to take it off. Eg in the check-in line and you need something from it. Your partner could get it out for you. One example, in any case.
good review , im about to order mine on sale :)
Good call. I still use mine most days. One of the best bits of photography gear I've ever bought - hands-down :)
love the pro tactic after watching hundreds of youtube videos myself. I do like the Shimado V2 but priced out of reach, trying to determine if I need the 350 or 450 thanks for the video
Thanks mate - had the pack for about a year now and still really happy with my purchase :)
I have the same bag, bought it May 2020 and absolutely love it for all the reasons you've given. The biggest drawback however, and the only reason I'm awaiting delivery of the Whistler 450 AW II, is the simple issue of not having any real space for clothing or jackets etc. I have bags I attach to the outside but this becomes quite cumbersome. The Whistler will hopefully solve this problem for me. Otherwise the ProTactic 450 AW II is still a brilliant bag.
~ Hew
Thanks Hew - great to hear that you still like it after a year. If I was a bit more active and did longer hikes I'd probably be thinking along the same lines - I did like the look of the Whistler!
That is so funny, I did the same thing back in 2019/2020. BH Photo had a crazy Black Friday sale on the ProTactic so I got it. But it was too small to hold all of my other crap that I take on my sunrise and sunset shots (gardening knee pad, jackets, head lamps, flash lights, Go Pro and its accessories, and trekking pole etc.) So, I got the Whistler too. I love that bag! But I am going on a safari and since I do not need to hike and will be in a car, I have brought the ProTactic out of storage and started watching videos on how to pack it 🙂 I am so happy I wasn't the only one that did this.
Thanks for your great review !!
My pleasure!
Love my 450 AWII and also have the smaller 350 AW II
will the 350 fit a gripped r5 with l bracket?
which do you use more when actually making photos?