Lancaster - A Gaming Rules! Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @JSmid6
    @JSmid6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I will definitely have to play this sometime, it looks really interesting!

  • @mattalevyatgmail
    @mattalevyatgmail 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lancaster is a game I’d been interested in for a while, so thanks for doing this review!

  • @brucef5430
    @brucef5430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A great, yet honest, review! Thanks, Paul.

  • @KissellMissile
    @KissellMissile 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm an anomaly, but I love the game at 3. There are only 2 nobles, so many of the castles will be gone by round 2, or even round 1 if that bonus is taken in France. Because many of the castles are not available in the early game (they require strength 3 or 4 knights), and the nobles in the early castles go quick, the important castles shift in the game, and there is plenty of competition.

  • @bievanwoensel5828
    @bievanwoensel5828 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Paul, for this excellent review.

  • @Tombonzo
    @Tombonzo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another Quality review, Paul. Thank you!

  • @leestanford697
    @leestanford697 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this. I've seen copies of Lancaster on my FLGS shelf for a while, and always wondered how it played.

  • @timtylinski5939
    @timtylinski5939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lancaster is my favorite game. Overall, you did a great job of providing an overview of the game and reviewing its pros/cons. For completeness, you should have shown a little bit about the castle location and its associated actions. Well done as usual.

  • @RaduStanculescu
    @RaduStanculescu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the thumbnail by the way, like to see you getting creative with them. 😃

  • @carrickrichards2457
    @carrickrichards2457 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There are many games in this genre some quite heavy to get into. You are a great help deciding between them and making them more accessible. Thank you

  • @RaduStanculescu
    @RaduStanculescu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same here. I'm probably gonna be rubbish at bidding as well, but the fact that it works well with 5 might still put it on the table.

  • @spiozke
    @spiozke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jesus Christ, Paul. So much content, so much work. You really need some warm sea days)

  • @andrewbellavie795
    @andrewbellavie795 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Paul great review of one of the best eurogames of all time. I agree that the 2 player rules are kind of shite though. Probably better to have certain cities "closed" each round and vary this through the game. Tighten it up a bit.

  • @tonysimpkins4311
    @tonysimpkins4311 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree with you about player count. I play a lot of 2 - 3 players, and found this game not memorable and got rid of it.

  • @wicked8576
    @wicked8576 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoyed playing this game (my copy) but as my collection grew, it was one of the games I culled.. :-/

  • @user-fe7rz4ll8q
    @user-fe7rz4ll8q 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review. Why do you spend so much time on reviewing the 2-3p game? This is clearly not a game for 2-3 players so that's mostly irrelevant, they only put that on the box for commercial reasons

    • @lasthenge
      @lasthenge 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well it's a good mention for the same commercial reasons. People can decide better whether to buy it.
      I am happy new owner of the old version with New Laws expansion, bought it mostly for 4 player games.
      And I understand that I will be rather playing Troyes with 2 or 3 players, which I absolutely like at that player counts.

  • @neofitz5893
    @neofitz5893 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A very good game, ruined in France by a catastrophic French rulebook (one of the worst never edited; full of errors and nonsenses...).

    • @GamingRulesVideos
      @GamingRulesVideos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh no. That's a shame

    • @natedorward2256
      @natedorward2256 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GamingRulesVideos TBH I find the English language rulebook rather poor--it's weirdly organized and has some key ambiguities that I had to resolve with reference to BGG. (For instance--just try to find the rule that says you can't acquire two noble tiles from the same county. It's buried in there.... SOMEWHERE.)