This was always one of my favorite shots because it was in one, continuous take, but it never dawned on me how many separate compositions there are within it. Thanks for displaying them all!
I love how in the final shot, as Hooper walks away, that it reveals two men getting ready to paint over the shark fin (and obviously "Help! Shark!" further showing the Mayor's determination not to back down.
Great breakdown. The schedule issues on 'Jaws' notwithstanding, I think Spielberg's ability to make one shot do the work of 20 shots is part of what enables him to shoot films so quickly.
The first half of Jaws was filmed pretty much on schedule. It was only when they went out to sea for the Orca based scenes where the real problems began. Carl Gottlieb wrote in The Jaws Log they were only about a week behind schedule when they went out to sea.
As a student of films and filmmaker myself, and writer of 100 songs, in my experience art is created unconsciously and THEN understood afterwards. I think only about 50% of the "psychological meaning" of this blocking are conscious decisions. I heard Paul Thomas Anderson give an in-person discussion at a university, and a student stood up and related how he heard that PTA watched The Battle for Algiers just before he shot Magnolia. This student then went on to say that he'd spent 3 years writing his dissertation on the links between TBFA and Magnolia. To which PTA replied , "I watched the film and I liked it, there is no connection between these films".
I was watching this scene just the other night noticing how much blocking the actors had to learn and integrate . great video ...ps the mayor leaves and Brody is left facing the negative space , the sea ,and hopper walks Into it laughing
Again costuming is key i this visual storytelling. The mayor's blazer with Anchors represent his ethical motivation. Popularity and commerce. While Hooper dons a sport coat and a loose fitting tie representing a slipshod scholarly authority that is not being heard here. Brody is more laid back with his small town Police Chief uniform who is not being listened to but he is used to this and takes that more in stride. The audience takes this all in along with the analysis you have also brought out.
This analysis basically proves everyone’s beliefs to be correct. He really was the true villain of Jaws all along. He chose money and business over the lives of others, and inevitably paid the price Amazing video just like your analysis of the opening scene👍👍👍
I would imagine one of the best ways to learn this technique is live theater directing. The theater stage is one long camera take, which requires calculated and imaginative blocking to maintain and direct the audiences attention. The inclusion of a camera and lens adds one more dimension in focusing the audience's attention.
I cant agree more. Spielbergs brilliance with the came has etched itself into the very definition of great film making and story telling with the lens. we as the view are uniquely invited in the action not pushed out. and yet our invisible participation goes completely unnoticed aside from the fact of out enjoyment and entertainment being most forfilled
It would be nice if you would do more of these scenes from the movie. It’s interesting to have someone point out things that I never realized or considered.
Love the commentary: Man biggest fear. Cut to - Chief Brody's terrified look. Cut to - an old man with the biggest man hooters I've ever seen. Now that's horrifying!!!
Great analysis. Thank you. I really love these cut-free compositions and you e helped explain why. If you are looking for suggestions, I’d love to see a similar explanation of Ophuls shots.
Fantastic video. I learned so much. I have a TH-cam channel and I am a one man band with my filmmaking skills. So to see this advanced blocking create so much meaning was mind blowing. And inspiring.
That was an excellent example and explanation of camerawork and staging in JAWS. I need to write a paper on film techniques used in JAWS such as this. I intend on referencing this video as a source. Do you have any more content on Jaws?
It was not a "very deliberate choice" to show very little of the shark. The shark mechanisms were constantly malfunctioning and breaking, so they had to save it for the third act when it needed to be in action (attacking the boat). Thankfully, it was a happy accident, because the tension and fear build perfectly and the audience "sees" much more than is shown on screen. But it was not planned that way. It was not a stroke of genius from Spielberg to hide the shark, it was a necessity due to malfunctioning equipment. This is pretty common knowledge about the movie.
Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half. The beach attack scenes were all filmed late May to early July 1974. Bruce wasn't scheduled to appear in any scenes until second week in July. Far more of Bruce WAS intended to be seen during the sea hunt, but not for the beach scenes. Besides, Bruce couldn't be used in just 3 to 4 ft of water off State Beach etc. Its now become a myth that Bruce failed from the start of filming so couldn't be used. Not so. This is all in The Jaws Log and Memories From Martha's Vineyard books. 👍
Not so. The fact the shark didn't work had nothing to do with it only showing up in the third act. That was in the script that the shark is only fully revealed in the third act. It had nothing to do with it malfunctioning
As a fan of the long take, (Goodfellas restaurant scene is my favorite,) I'm amazed that I never even noticed this long take scene in Jaws. I guess it is true that great editing is something you don't notice.
I never realized this was a one shot scene. When I’m watching it, my attention is always focused on the brilliant acting and strong tension between the three characters so much so that I don’t take a moment to realize how difficult this scene must have been to film, because everyone knows one shots are a challenge not for the faint of heart. Yet Spielberg managed to pull it off very beautifully, and he was only 29
You mention Welles as an influence but even more so Ford and Kurosawa need to be mentioned as Spielberg influences. People mention Ford’s outdoor composition, which is breathtaking, but his camera placement and blocking indoors is what really facilitates me. With the size of cameras then Ford couldn’t rely on moving it as freely on indoor sets so tended to place the actors in frame and have them move around it and keep the audiences interest. There’s a frame in Stagecoach where we see all the riders staged within a room that expresses their characters, especially Peacock’s anxiety as he’s at the edge of frame staring out the window. Then we go to the Searchers where I expect Spielberg studied the most to study the oner, whereby Ford would have a fixed camera position and use actors movement in frame to keep our eye and also to tell story. My favourite instance being John Wayne meeting with his family and the Texas rangers, establishing meetings with all, as they gradually drop off frame, finally leaving Wayne, his brother’s with and the captain. Th captain stands closest to the camera, left frame, as Wayne kisses his brother’s wife’s head further behind in the frame, giving us insight to their relationship the script didn’t. Kurosawa was hugely influenced by Ford and along with him and Spielberg’s are the best at blocking I’ve seen, no surprise Kurosawa also influenced Spielberg.
Nice analysis. This scene leads into the great montage/fugue of people arriving at the beach. Another example of great camerawork is the ferry scene. Jaws is one of the most underappreciated movies around, only scholars get its brilliance.
I'm not a scholar, but the way silence intensified both the scene with Brody and his kid making faces at each other after dinner, and then the one of Quint telling the story of the USS Indianapolis have stayed with me since I first saw the movie as a teen. I remember them, but never think of the actual 'drama' of the shark attacks, or say, the jump scare of the floating, underwater, eyeless head frightening Hooper.
Not for the first half of the film. Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
@@lyndoncmp5751 Sorry mate, but that shark was supposed to be seen from the first kill. 1....Chrissy's attack at the beginning. You were supposed to see a silhouette of the shark through the water before the shark's first initial bite on her, everything else would be the same that we got in the finished film. 2....The attack on the young Kitchner boy. 1) A front view, with the shark's head rising out of the water behind the boy like a semi breach while he's lying on his float the Kitchner boy and bites him in half. Also, you will see Brody's boy and his mates in front of him playing with their Gridiron ball like we already get in the finished film but more brutal. What we see is the last couple of seconds after the Sharks bitten down and we see a dorsal fin. and then you see a side of the float pop up and a bit of blood spraying all over the place and some of the kid screaming his head off. 2) The second camera angle. is a bird's eye aerial shot from the side similar to the front camera angle. What we saw in the movie was the actual attack scene was not filmed at Martha's Vineyard. Martha's Vineyard was too shallow, so they took it somewhere else later on when the shark was working. And they filmed it in 30 ft deep of water. There are black and white photos on the internet and heaps on TH-cam. The shark was never seen through the first half of the movie because the shark never worked. No, it was not cut from the movie. because it was violent. It was cut because of filming problems and where they filmed the actual attack with Bruce the shark the sun was starting to go down and they couldn't get the same lighting and right shot to blend in with the same lighting they had on Martha's Vineyard, so they were forced to edit that scene, and we got what we got. But I'm telling you, I don't think they realized by now that we have media players that can slow down the picture that slow these days, we can tell exactly what was happening in that scene and what was cut. If you do that, you'll see exactly what's happening. 3....the attack on the man in the Estuary (pond). Originally after getting knocked out of the rowboat the man was supposed to be in the mouth of the shark with blood spitting out of his mouth like Quint at the end of the movie on the Orca and he's getting pushed through the water towards Michael Brody's son. Then the man picks up Michael and throws him to the side, so the shark doesn't harm him. Then the shark slowly descends into the water with the man in its mouth. I don't know about the man's leg getting bitten off and float to the bottom of the pond. The rest of the movie was filmed the same as the finished film we got to see. Hope you learnt something new today. For those people who did not about this, go watch the making of the movie it's on the DVD and TH-cam. I'll add before I go the novel is far way better and the attacks are more detailed, with an extra attack we don't get to see Ben Gardner's attack, that we only know about and get to see after the aftermath. Also, an affair between Brody's missus and Hooper, and the real reason why the mayor doesn't want to close down the beaches on the 4th of July weekend because he's in debt with the mob because he wants to build a resort which ironically, we see It's grand opening in the beginning of Part 2. So, there you have it complete history of Jaws the movie and the book......LOL
The mayor is an idiot 💀 I like how most of the time, Hooper and Brody are on the same side of each-other. It just enforces that their goal is the same.
I think too many people think its only the mayor because he's the front man. In reality the rest of the select men, the newspaper editor and the coroner were also complicit. It was more than just one man.
Not sure if your “very deliberate choice” about showing the shark was sarcasm or not. The shark didn’t work most of the time so they couldn’t show it. Lol. Apparently originally we were suppose to see it in the opening attack.
Myth Im afraid. Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
Wasn’t a deliberate choice to show as little of the shark as possible. They literally had to film without it because it wasn’t working. Which ended up working in his favor
Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
ima be real, i think half of this stuff you're just overanalyzing. the point is that moving the camera around in a way that tells the story will lead to "happy accidents," some so good that entire youtube channels will be dedicated to dissecting all sorts of layered and brilliant motives...that were probably never intentional to begin with.
I agree. I love every aspect of Jaws, but please don't tell me that the composition at 12.42, "shot" 17 is anything but 'yuk'. Hooper's chin literally on the bottom frame line. They could have given Dreyfus a bit matting to walk on to, to raise him up a bit. Petty? I don't think so, not if you are making claims about the perfection of this 2+ minute shot.
the major in a position of power while the others weaker... well yes and no, but it has more to do with the relationship of the characters to the mayor, and how to make them fit into the scene, not to show the half of them because they are 'weaker'
I don't think there's anything objectively inferior about the modern filmmakers' tendency to rely more on cuts and editing rather than camera work and blocking for visual storytelling, but I think it's a damn shame this style is all but extinct in Hollywood.
Very, VERY much worth your 13 minutes of Attention. ... ... .... this Video_dude KNOWS what makes TRANSCENDENT FILMs Transcendent.... ...(....ESPECIALLY what he observes in the scene with Mayor Vaughn, in front of the Billboard. ....)... ....... a TREMENDOUS vid, right here. ___--Stephen A. •••
You don't get it. The author is not exploring audience interpretation but demonstrating the filmmaking genius of Steven Spielberg who, though a brilliant director, no way intended the author's interpretation of shots 11 and 12.
Cine-machanic, all this is interesting micro-analysis - but, brilliant though Spielberg is, aren't you perhaps giving him too much credit here? These are all your own observations, and I'd find it surprising if Spielberg himself gave this level of thought to such a short clip.
Yet another person who is not aware of how conscious the pros are of what they are doing. But to confirm it, one only has to watch a Spielberg film, any one, and analyze it, and the same thought will be found. Further, it is not just Spielberg. He is just one of the directors who like this style. It's an entire cinema school.
This analysis is remarkable. What an incredible scene in one take. Spielberg truly is a genius.
Good eye for that Wellesian low-angle composition. Clever, too, how Spielberg uses a tilt-up to the billboard as an excuse to motivate his low angle.
Yeap.
This was always one of my favorite shots because it was in one, continuous take, but it never dawned on me how many separate compositions there are within it. Thanks for displaying them all!
I love how in the final shot, as Hooper walks away, that it reveals two men getting ready to paint over the shark fin (and obviously "Help! Shark!" further showing the Mayor's determination not to back down.
Great breakdown. The schedule issues on 'Jaws' notwithstanding, I think Spielberg's ability to make one shot do the work of 20 shots is part of what enables him to shoot films so quickly.
The first half of Jaws was filmed pretty much on schedule. It was only when they went out to sea for the Orca based scenes where the real problems began.
Carl Gottlieb wrote in The Jaws Log they were only about a week behind schedule when they went out to sea.
As a student of films and filmmaker myself, and writer of 100 songs, in my experience art is created unconsciously and THEN understood afterwards. I think only about 50% of the "psychological meaning" of this blocking are conscious decisions. I heard Paul Thomas Anderson give an in-person discussion at a university, and a student stood up and related how he heard that PTA watched The Battle for Algiers just before he shot Magnolia. This student then went on to say that he'd spent 3 years writing his dissertation on the links between TBFA and Magnolia. To which PTA replied , "I watched the film and I liked it, there is no connection between these films".
I was watching this scene just the other night noticing how much blocking the actors had to learn and integrate . great video ...ps the mayor leaves and Brody is left facing the negative space , the sea ,and hopper walks Into it laughing
What does blocking mean? I'm from Germany
@@SeSe-xr3gothe various positions everyone needs to move into at specific points during the scene. Including the camera.
Again costuming is key i this visual storytelling. The mayor's blazer with Anchors represent his ethical motivation. Popularity and commerce. While Hooper dons a sport coat and a loose fitting tie representing a slipshod scholarly authority that is not being heard here. Brody is more laid back with his small town Police Chief uniform who is not being listened to but he is used to this and takes that more in stride. The audience takes this all in along with the analysis you have also brought out.
This analysis basically proves everyone’s beliefs to be correct. He really was the true villain of Jaws all along. He chose money and business over the lives of others, and inevitably paid the price
Amazing video just like your analysis of the opening scene👍👍👍
I would imagine one of the best ways to learn this technique is live theater directing. The theater stage is one long camera take, which requires calculated and imaginative blocking to maintain and direct the audiences attention. The inclusion of a camera and lens adds one more dimension in focusing the audience's attention.
I cant agree more. Spielbergs brilliance with the came has etched itself into the very definition of great film making and story telling with the lens. we as the view are uniquely invited in the action not pushed out. and yet our invisible participation goes completely unnoticed aside from the fact of out enjoyment and entertainment being most forfilled
Amazing scene analysis. Thoroughly enjoyed and learnt from this video.💯
I absolutely love your videos im hooked thank you so much for your analysis. Jaws is one of my favorite horror films of all time!
Thanks. Glad to have you!
Great vid! I study this scene in my storyboarding class
Thanks! Glad to hear it.
Even more amazing: he was only 26 when he did all this!
It would be nice if you would do more of these scenes from the movie. It’s interesting to have someone point out things that I never realized or considered.
Great site for expert analysis of movies. Great movie making learning experience. “...now I see”
Appreciate the comment.
Love the commentary: Man biggest fear. Cut to - Chief Brody's terrified look. Cut to - an old man with the biggest man hooters I've ever seen. Now that's horrifying!!!
This was a brilliantly observed essay, thank you.
Immediate Sub and Like.
Great analysis. Thank you. I really love these cut-free compositions and you e helped explain why.
If you are looking for suggestions, I’d love to see a similar explanation of Ophuls shots.
Fantastic video. I learned so much. I have a TH-cam channel and I am a one man band with my filmmaking skills. So to see this advanced blocking create so much meaning was mind blowing. And inspiring.
Great job here
I've watched this film over 100 times, and this is the first time I've realized the girl on the billboard is on a yellow raft!
And that signifies what?
@@michellemckillop8935 Alex is killed whist using a yellow raft after Vaughan ignores Brody and Hooper - foreshadowing?
@@fizzao1342 but didn’t this shot take place after that boy’s death?
YES! Amen to that.
I’m serious, I didn’t know anyone else had actually watched this film 100+ times. 👍
@michellemckillop8935
We first see the billboard in an earlier scene when Brody drives past it on the way to look for Chrissie.
Brilliant breakdown! Thank you.
Thanx for this Analyses.
thanks for watching
Cool essay.
That was an excellent example and explanation of camerawork and staging in JAWS. I need to write a paper on film techniques used in JAWS such as this. I intend on referencing this video as a source.
Do you have any more content on Jaws?
That is awesome. Thanks for stopping by. I have. 2nd Jaws video on my channel as well.
clever observations. that 7 minute take either took a lot of rehearsals or a lot of re takes
Hey thanks sir!
The mayor's sports coats, chef's kiss.
Insane amount of prep it must have been for the actors and crew for just this one long shot. I'm curious how many takes it took to get it right.
Please make one on character arc
Jaws is perfect
It was not a "very deliberate choice" to show very little of the shark.
The shark mechanisms were constantly malfunctioning and breaking, so they had to save it for the third act when it needed to be in action (attacking the boat).
Thankfully, it was a happy accident, because the tension and fear build perfectly and the audience "sees" much more than is shown on screen.
But it was not planned that way. It was not a stroke of genius from Spielberg to hide the shark, it was a necessity due to malfunctioning equipment.
This is pretty common knowledge about the movie.
What I meant was that it was a "deliberate choice" after it became obvious the shark wasn't reliable enough.
Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half. The beach attack scenes were all filmed late May to early July 1974. Bruce wasn't scheduled to appear in any scenes until second week in July. Far more of Bruce WAS intended to be seen during the sea hunt, but not for the beach scenes.
Besides, Bruce couldn't be used in just 3 to 4 ft of water off State Beach etc.
Its now become a myth that Bruce failed from the start of filming so couldn't be used. Not so.
This is all in The Jaws Log and Memories From Martha's Vineyard books. 👍
Not so. The fact the shark didn't work had nothing to do with it only showing up in the third act. That was in the script that the shark is only fully revealed in the third act. It had nothing to do with it malfunctioning
04:23: filmed at beautiful Aquinnah, on Martha's Vineyard.
It's the little things that make a big difference!
Great video, nice insight in to all the tricks directors use and that most the time we just don't realize :)
Thanks for that
THANK YOU. FOR THIS VIDEO COMMENTARY, Cine-mechanic..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...just tremendous!
Thank you very much!
@@cine-mechanic8589 i look forward to all of your future work, with great interest!
Steven does what more directors need to do. Get the hell out of the way and let your actors ACT
💥
Lol! I'm pretty sure they rehearsed that scene intensely before filming it.
Amazing
As a fan of the long take, (Goodfellas restaurant scene is my favorite,) I'm amazed that I never even noticed this long take scene in Jaws. I guess it is true that great editing is something you don't notice.
There is another similar scene earlier on the little car ferry. One long shot.
I never realized this was a one shot scene. When I’m watching it, my attention is always focused on the brilliant acting and strong tension between the three characters so much so that I don’t take a moment to realize how difficult this scene must have been to film, because everyone knows one shots are a challenge not for the faint of heart. Yet Spielberg managed to pull it off very beautifully, and he was only 29
In the scene with the billboard behind them it technically makes 5 characters in one scene adding the shark and potential victim
Every frame a painting
You mention Welles as an influence but even more so Ford and Kurosawa need to be mentioned as Spielberg influences. People mention Ford’s outdoor composition, which is breathtaking, but his camera placement and blocking indoors is what really facilitates me. With the size of cameras then Ford couldn’t rely on moving it as freely on indoor sets so tended to place the actors in frame and have them move around it and keep the audiences interest. There’s a frame in Stagecoach where we see all the riders staged within a room that expresses their characters, especially Peacock’s anxiety as he’s at the edge of frame staring out the window. Then we go to the Searchers where I expect Spielberg studied the most to study the oner, whereby Ford would have a fixed camera position and use actors movement in frame to keep our eye and also to tell story. My favourite instance being John Wayne meeting with his family and the Texas rangers, establishing meetings with all, as they gradually drop off frame, finally leaving Wayne, his brother’s with and the captain. Th captain stands closest to the camera, left frame, as Wayne kisses his brother’s wife’s head further behind in the frame, giving us insight to their relationship the script didn’t. Kurosawa was hugely influenced by Ford and along with him and Spielberg’s are the best at blocking I’ve seen, no surprise Kurosawa also influenced Spielberg.
Nice analysis. This scene leads into the great montage/fugue of people arriving at the beach. Another example of great camerawork is the ferry scene. Jaws is one of the most underappreciated movies around, only scholars get its brilliance.
I'm not a scholar, but the way silence intensified both the scene with Brody and his kid making faces at each other after dinner, and then the one of Quint telling the story of the USS Indianapolis have stayed with me since I first saw the movie as a teen. I remember them, but never think of the actual 'drama' of the shark attacks, or say, the jump scare of the floating, underwater, eyeless head frightening Hooper.
Brilliant video, thank you. You deserve more views.
cool
I’m doing my exam on jaws (I have to write a essay about it and analyse it) thank you these videos are so helpful
No problem, thanks for stopping by. Good luck on the exam!
I literally have to do this as well! could you send me yours so i can use it as a reference???
@@sjpulls7244 Or you could just watch the movie, use your brain, and make your own opinion.
Kids these days are hopeless.
The choice not to show too much of the shark was more due to the fact the shark wasn't working properly much of the time.
Not for the first half of the film. Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
@@lyndoncmp5751 Sorry mate, but that shark was supposed to be seen from the first kill.
1....Chrissy's attack at the beginning.
You were supposed to see a silhouette of the shark through the water before the shark's first initial bite on her, everything else would be the same that we got in the finished film.
2....The attack on the young Kitchner boy.
1) A front view, with the shark's head rising out of the water behind the boy like a semi breach while he's lying on his float the Kitchner boy and bites him in half. Also, you will see Brody's boy and his mates in front of him playing with their Gridiron ball like we already get in the finished film but more brutal.
What we see is the last couple of seconds after the Sharks bitten down and we see a dorsal fin. and then you see a side of the float pop up and a bit of blood spraying all over the place and some of the kid screaming his head off.
2) The second camera angle. is a bird's eye aerial shot from the side similar to the front camera angle. What we saw in the movie was the actual attack scene was not filmed at Martha's Vineyard.
Martha's Vineyard was too shallow, so they took it somewhere else later on when the shark was working. And they filmed it in 30 ft deep of water.
There are black and white photos on the internet and heaps on TH-cam. The shark was never seen through the first half of the movie because the shark never worked.
No, it was not cut from the movie. because it was violent. It was cut because of filming problems and where they filmed the actual attack with Bruce the shark the sun was starting to go down and they couldn't get the same lighting and right shot to blend in with the same lighting they had on Martha's Vineyard, so they were forced to edit that scene, and we got what we got.
But I'm telling you, I don't think they realized by now that we have media players that can slow down the picture that slow these days, we can tell exactly what was happening in that scene and what was cut. If you do that, you'll see exactly what's happening.
3....the attack on the man in the Estuary (pond).
Originally after getting knocked out of the rowboat the man was supposed to be in the mouth of the shark with blood spitting out of his mouth like Quint at the end of the movie on the Orca and he's getting pushed through the water towards Michael Brody's son.
Then the man picks up Michael and throws him to the side, so the shark doesn't harm him. Then the shark slowly descends into the water with the man in its mouth.
I don't know about the man's leg getting bitten off and float to the bottom of the pond.
The rest of the movie was filmed the same as the finished film we got to see.
Hope you learnt something new today. For those people who did not about this, go watch the making of the movie it's on the DVD and TH-cam.
I'll add before I go the novel is far way better and the attacks are more detailed, with an extra attack we don't get to see Ben Gardner's attack, that we only know about and get to see after the aftermath.
Also, an affair between Brody's missus and Hooper, and the real reason why the mayor doesn't want to close down the beaches on the 4th of July weekend because he's in debt with the mob because he wants to build a resort which ironically, we see It's grand opening in the beginning of Part 2.
So, there you have it complete history of Jaws the movie and the book......LOL
The Spielberg “L” movement in frame 😊
filmed in cold weather off season so all the people are dressed accordingly vs 90 degree 4th of july normal temps in the area.
In the book Mayor Vaughn has the Mafia on his back.
The mayor is an idiot 💀 I like how most of the time, Hooper and Brody are on the same side of each-other. It just enforces that their goal is the same.
I think too many people think its only the mayor because he's the front man. In reality the rest of the select men, the newspaper editor and the coroner were also complicit. It was more than just one man.
Not sure if your “very deliberate choice” about showing the shark was sarcasm or not. The shark didn’t work most of the time so they couldn’t show it. Lol. Apparently originally we were suppose to see it in the opening attack.
Myth Im afraid. Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
Wasn’t a deliberate choice to show as little of the shark as possible. They literally had to film without it because it wasn’t working. Which ended up working in his favor
Bruce wasn't scheduled to be used for the first half of the movie. The first half was filmed more or less on schedule. The shark was hidden on purpose for the first half.
Can you explain the theme man versus nature in this film?
You're joking, right? It's literally 85% of the movie in every regard.
(the other 15% being man vs man)
What was Spielbergs influences one might wonder.
David Lean, Hitchcock, Hawks....
Watch The Fabelmans.
ima be real, i think half of this stuff you're just overanalyzing. the point is that moving the camera around in a way that tells the story will lead to "happy accidents," some so good that entire youtube channels will be dedicated to dissecting all sorts of layered and brilliant motives...that were probably never intentional to begin with.
I agree. I love every aspect of Jaws, but please don't tell me that the composition at 12.42, "shot" 17 is anything but 'yuk'. Hooper's chin literally on the bottom frame line. They could have given Dreyfus a bit matting to walk on to, to raise him up a bit. Petty? I don't think so, not if you are making claims about the perfection of this 2+ minute shot.
they should have called "hooper", hoopstein
the major in a position of power while the others weaker... well yes and no, but it has more to do with the relationship of the characters to the mayor, and how to make them fit into the scene, not to show the half of them because they are 'weaker'
Apologies to my mother and my grandmother but the sound of this Charger give me an erec-tion
Love the analysis. But warning: use of overused word "iconic" - and that's my only complaint
I'm not sure if you're trying to be artistic, relaxing, or if you're trying not to wake someone up who's asleep in the next room.
Thanks for the compliment.
DONT BLINK!!!!! LOOOL
I don't think there's anything objectively inferior about the modern filmmakers' tendency to rely more on cuts and editing rather than camera work and blocking for visual storytelling, but I think it's a damn shame this style is all but extinct in Hollywood.
Very, VERY much worth your 13 minutes of Attention. ... ... .... this Video_dude KNOWS what makes TRANSCENDENT FILMs Transcendent.... ...(....ESPECIALLY what he observes in the scene with Mayor Vaughn, in front of the Billboard. ....)... ....... a TREMENDOUS vid, right here. ___--Stephen A. •••
Analysis of shots 11 and 12 are bollocks - it's not as deep as the voiceover claims
It can have whatever meaning the audience takes from it. That’s how art works. It’s all subjective. Great works of art like this film go pretty deep.
You don't get it. The author is not exploring audience interpretation but demonstrating the filmmaking genius of Steven Spielberg who, though a brilliant director, no way intended the author's interpretation of shots 11 and 12.
@@richardpreece5384maybe I don’t get it. Unless you’re hearing it from them directly, how can anyone know exactly what an artist’s intentions are?
Cine-machanic, all this is interesting micro-analysis - but, brilliant though Spielberg is, aren't you perhaps giving him too much credit here? These are all your own observations, and I'd find it surprising if Spielberg himself gave this level of thought to such a short clip.
Guy is full of shit
Yet another person who is not aware of how conscious the pros are of what they are doing.
But to confirm it, one only has to watch a Spielberg film, any one, and analyze it, and the same thought will be found.
Further, it is not just Spielberg. He is just one of the directors who like this style. It's an entire cinema school.
dreyfus ruined that movie