So Nashville shouldn’t have an NFL team because it’s in SEC country but Austin and Columbus should get one. No owner in their right mind would want to compete with Texas and Ohio state. Titans biggest in city competitor is Vanderbilt. The argument against Nashville having a team is why Austin and Columbus don’t have one and probably never will
@@IG8282-q9h The same channel that said the Florida Panthers should relocate for many years up until they won it all. I would like to see a big 4 teams who should relocate, post Coyotes and A's, I wonder how they're reacting for Utah over Quebec City.
@@IG8282-q9h They also said that the Florida Panthers should relocate until they won the cup, I would like to see a teams who should relocate list (Post Coyotes and Post A's), watch them say the Utah team should move to Quebec and the Sacramento Kings, Rays, and Jaguars.
They're bigots against Nashville as notice how they praised Austin as almost the same in every way to Nashville but they think Austin deserves a team and Nashville doesn't. I live in NW Alabama and can tell you that the Titans do a piss poor job of winning over fans here although we're supposedly in their market. There's no merchandising, no events... nothing. But if you put a team in Austin, they'd do the same thing to the communities in their market. The NFL as a whole does a bad job in most markets but I'd support the Titans if they showed any concern to support us which they don't. But still, I don't understand the hate on Nashville when TPS basically identifies Austin as your ugly twin sister and states they deserve a team but Nashville doesn't.
100% Tijuana has 2.9 million people...they always talk about expanding into the Mexican market....yet completely abandoned it... Massively stupid. (Same with Toronto....no Toronto, Canada does NOT cheer for Buffalo, New York...there are more COWBOYS fans in Toronto than Bills fans...put a team in Toronto it's twice the population of San Diego...)
This video is just awful. Austin, Columbus, and the OKC area have massive college football, but expecting the same people to shell out even more $ for an NFL team as well is absurd. Charlotte draws well when they have capable ownership, which they don't have at the moment. Salt Lake City and San Antonio make more sense than your other choices.
@@58twright It's really not... and for some reason, Austin is Texans and Astros territory. (Actually, it IS closer to Houston, now that I think about it.)
I'd go with New Braunfels and meet halfway in between. Build there...40 min drive to Austin, 40 min drive to San Antonio Probably the best location on EARTH for another NFL team. Call em the Texas _______.
You are really contradicting yourself calling a college football town like Nashville not deserving an NFL yet saying college football towns like Austin, OKC and Columbus deserve an NFL team , so why do Austin, OKC and Columbus deserve an NFL while Nashville does not!?!?! as for Oakland, they had over 2 decades to come up with a plan to replace the coliseum that all parties involved could accept and failed while Las Vegas offered a stadium solution in a year!
I live in OKC and can absolutely say Nashville is deserving of the titans. The new stadium is gonna be awesome and Music city does rally around the titans
i bet if oakland and st louis still had teams you'd be saying they should lose it because of their stadiums. These opinion video's used to be good but have taken a massive dive in quality in recently years.......
Jesus Christ, Ohio is crowded with 2 nfl teams. The thought of 3 of them would really be crazy. True, I love the captial, but 😂 wow, would it be insane if there was a third.
Were you around for the draft in Nashville? This town supports their teams. Always a sellout at Nissan!! Not to mention, over $2B is going into a new stadium. The Titans are here to stay..
They love lying! TPS IS THE WROST . I live in Nashville, and have for the last 28 years. The Titans are extremely beloved, and always sell out . Idk where they get their information from
Oakland doesnt deserve SheEEet. first and last game i attended left in a tow truck cause someone took a knife to the car tires ... XD the entire population is just garbage. not good dudes prolly the worst fan base etc . didnt they throw beer on players in the 80's ?
It's not so much the city, just so long as it's in the state within reasonable driving distance. Why not have one team actually in New York, while the other stays in New Jersey? To me, that would be the best and most reasonable solution.
@carloskreek7419 East Rutherford is 12 miles from Manhattan. The realistic places to build an NFL stadium on the New York side would be in Westchester County or Long Island, neither which of is a more reasonable drive. It ain't that damn hard to get to New Jersey.
@@DarkSideMaceWindu The problem is that no team should be calling itself New York and playing in New Jersey. They should just be the New Jersey Giants and The New Jersey Jets.
@DarkSideMaceWindu Honestly, I've only been to New York City, but just as a quick trip. Didn't get long enough to familiarize myself with it. I was merely giving my observation of having two teams supposedly in new York but they're in New Jersey. Makes you wonder why they aren't referred to as "New Jersey" Jets and Giants. At least the Chargers and Rams teams are both in LA.
Oakland is a complete shit hole that shouldn't have any team. The Chargers need to go back to SD or get out of CA. And screw OKC, bring a team to Tulsa.
Titans can't thrive in a college area... Austin Columbus and OkC are huge college footballs cities.. so they should work... ummmm....what? Also states that don't need more football teams California,Texas, Florida, Ohio, and New York.
New York State only has one team, no matter where the Jets and Giants played in the past. Besides, outside of the Buffalo area and NYC area, there isn't an area in NYS that could support an NFL team, and Buffalo can't support a second team, so I think NYS is not getting another team.
@@MikeyKaos716 @kennystrawser3220 Right. The NFL is not gonna put a team in Albany or Rochester, or (insert an other NY town here). Other than Buffalo, the other cities and media markets in the state just aren't big enough, and Rochester is too close to Buffalo to justify it, anyway.
Oakland doesnt deserve SheEEet. first and last game i attended left in a tow truck cause someone took a knife to the car tires ... XD the entire population is just garbage. not good dudes prolly the worst fan base etc . didnt they throw beer on players in the 80's ?
Yeah everybody trashes the Eagles for shit that happened 30 years ago yes we shouldn't have cheer when Michael Irvin was hurt but the Texans fans cheered when Matt Schaub got hurt who was their own quarterback because they wanted him benched then you have the Cowboys a few years ago throwing drinks at their own players because they lost a playoff game and niners and Oakland fans have killed people!!!! @@fantasybeast7202
This list is a bunch of garbage and TPS is as well. Nashville is a great city for football and us Titans fans are large, crazy and proud! Obviously no one at TPS has been to a game instead of hanging in their mom’s basement.
The Rams were in LA for nearly 50 years before they were ripped from LA and moved to St. Louis. Kronke just moved them back to where they belong. Anyone that says otherwise needs to check the history of the Rams. And it's only because of the fact that they were ripped out of LA for 2 decades that they lost their LA fan base...🙄🙄🙄🙄
Cleveland has the Browns, Howard. That's enough for any group of fans. The stupid thing is saying St. Louis should have a franchise. Twice they've had NFL teams, twice they've left for greener pastures. St. Louis is a baseball town, always has been, always will be.
@@jimmydavis8617 The Rams and chargers also have to compete with USC and UCLA. If ownership was better and they took care of the stadium they would still be in ST Louis and would probably be fine
Personally - I don't have a problem with the Giants & Jets in East Rutherford New Jersey. It's right across the river of Manhattan with a great view of the New York Skyline. It's an area that packs the sell out crowds and has a world class mall across the highway, Tons of luxury Hotels near the area and a short drive to the Airports. The Giants have tons of fans in the Garden State as well as the Big Apple. The Jets have growing fans in the Jersey area and a ton of fans in New York. From that area - Both teams get the support of 2 cities. That makes it good for business. You may not like the location, But Face the Facts - It Works. 🤑🤑
@@bradleysample3246 The American Dream is always open, But their parking is always closed during stadium events to avoid any additional traffic. Building a sports & entertainment complex on the secluded Jersey side of the Metro area is alot better than building it at the heart of New Yorks legendary traffic.
As a columbus native we don’t need an nfl team. We already have enough construction as it is. Almost everyone living here is either a browns, bengals, or steelers fans. It’s a perfect balance and throwing in a new team will just feel weird. Nobody here has ever wanted to have an nfl team. But we do want an NBA team.
When I saw the city I'm from in the thumbnail, I already knew this video was BS. You do realize the Titans are getting a new stadium right? You never mention that in videos. Same for the Jags. No one gives a fuck about Vanderbilt. There are way more Vols fans around the state and UT is in Knoxville. Why is Columbus on the list? The Buckeyes are way too iconic so it doesn't need an NFL team. Have you ever been to Nashville? Apparently not since you ALWAYS miss the mark every time you talk about the Titans.
No one does research on videos like this. - It's NEVER about who "deserves" a team when it comes to sports leagues. It's all about what's the best business decision. - Oakland is a dying, shrinking city. They're losing all their sports teams for a reason. If it ever gets better, again, it's going to take a couple *decades* before they're even looked at for expansion/relocation. - Nashville is literally building a new stadium right now. They broke ground in March. - If and when Texas gets a 3rd team, it's going to San Antonio, more than likely. That city packed a decrepit Alamodome for minor league teams. - Columbus has no real shot at anything other than _maybe_ an NBA team, and even that would be a reach. - You fail to mention that St. Louis lost about 4 NFL teams and only kept all 4 for relatively short periods of time. Rams for 20 years, Cardinals for 27, Gunners for 9 and All-stars for like a couple months. - There is no room in actual NYC for an NFL sized stadium, unless they tear buildings down to make room... and there's only so many buildings you can demolish (or be allowed to) in that city. It's unrealistic to think that anywhere else other than the New Jersey suburbs are suitable for the Jets and Giants. The only thing from this video I agree with is Jacksonville, but even they're building something for their stadium to keep them around. And the Chargers should be in San Diego. The Rams are the "Legacy Franchise" in L.A. . . . one is enough for them. But if they had to have a 2nd team, it should have been the Raiders.
The fault in your list is that the Titans are getting a new Stadium and the Jaguars are renovating theirs. Only obvious "lose" from your list is the Panthers.
cant afford to move so the population drop in oakland those years death and now with regulation adv in medicine etc less death = population growth. absolute bad place hate the raidur bandwagoners coming to santa clara ngl #Goaway , #Giveallyourmoneytovegas :D
The other 31 owners would never allow David Tepper to move the Panthers out of Charlotte. Besides that, the city of Charlotte agreed to help fund renovations to BoA Stadium.
I live in Charlotte and it is far from an obvious loss. The city is growing and the corporate presence is here along with a prime stadium location. Charlotte is not unique that it will see less butts in the seats when the team sucks.
At least you do not suggest an expansion. 32 teams are really enough. But asking both NFL teams to move away from LA is just nuts. The Rams were there from 1946 to 1994 and returned after a 22-year "stopover" in St. Louis. The Chargers though still have more fans in San Diego than they (probably ever will) have in LA.
I pick these cities to have NFL teams; Hibbing Minnesota (Da-range), Rapid City South Dakota, Billings, Montana, Portland Oregon, Boise Idaho, Little Rock Arkansas, Salt Lake City Utah, Minot North Dakota, Ames, Iowa, just for starters to mix up and offer those future fans a base since they're not recognized.
Grew up in Hibbing, MN No way that area could sustain an NFL franchise even if you located it in Duluth. Besides, Minnesota can't sustain two NFL franchises. Possibly De Moines. Iowa has the Hawkeyes in Iowa City, however. Arkansas is college football country. Maybe Portland or Salt Lake City. Even those cities would be a stretch.
Salt lake is the only one on this possible as in portland thwir surrounded by 3 california market teams and up above them they have seattle seahawks. So logistically portland wont work
The Chargers belong in San Diego and never should have moved. Austin or San Antonio do deserve a team. As for moving the Titans out of Nashville, you’d have to be on meth to think that will ever happen. Or should. Insane.
st. louis also didn't deserve to lose their team...I get LA was too big to pass on....but now LA is oversaturated with NFL teams...meanwhile st. louis XFL games average almost 40,000 people... and toronto-hamilton (7,281,694)...is larger than San Antonio AND Austin combined....(San Antonio-Austin - 5,258,922) Canada loves NFL. Toronto hates CFL. CFL is not a real league. Toronto HATES Buffalo...like the cities are rivals...nobody cheers for Buffalo...there are more Cowboys fans in Toronto. Plus the NFL price gouged Toronto with $180 dollar average ticket prices....no American would pay that LOL Superbowl prices....to see the Bills in 2007 HAHAHAHA...obviously people were pissed...Toronto would cheer for a TORONTO team, or CANADIAN team...not a rival city LMFAO)
You said it, there are already two teams in Ohio. Milwaukee football fans have no problems with their Wisconsin team being a couple hours of drive away.
Saying Nashville should lose the Titans while Columbus should get a team is idiotic. Absolutely nobody in Columbus is ditching the Brown, Bengals or Steelers for a random team.
I agree BAD city choice. But obviously people in Columbus, the largest city in Ohio would cheer for THEIR NFL TEAM...not the Browns or Bengals lol It is still a bad choice. But that's not how cities work...people cheer for the HOME TEAM haha
Tennessee actually has a booming economy though and he has good management and is able to support a football team that way for Oakland. I’m not so sure.
Rams definitely have a big fanbase in Los Angeles, and. The market is so much more desirable in LA over St Louis. Glad the Rams returned back to their main city of LA.
Here is one you DID MISSED: Nothing ever gets done in Washington. Least of all a stadium deal. It would be ideal to move the Commanders to St. Louis and give them a better name. At least they would be in a position to have a decent stadium and set them up for some respectibility.
I love how TPS always says "Poor St. Louis lost the Rams" They took the Rams away from LA after they were in SoCal for almost 50 years in the first place!!! That caused a whole generation of people like me who were born in the 90s in LA to either not watch the NFL or bandwagon onto the Cowboys, Packers, 49ers, Patriots or Chiefs or some other random team (Cuz thr Raiders went back to Oakland basically at the same time). LA is also a massive city that lots of people relocate to. Hence why the opposing teams fans always show up in masses
While I'm at it, For years I've thought that if St. Louis ever gets a new team, that the St. Louis Archers would make a great name! By Archers, I mean the bow and arrow type. It, of course, also brings up the cities best landmark, The Gateway Arch.
Portland, Oregon deserves a team. They were about to be awarded a team (that became the Seahawks with the Kingdome) back in the day. Think about it . Built in rivalry with Seattle and Frisco. Build a Dome in the Delta Park area and draw from a larger region.
About an hour and a half East of Oklahoma City is where you can put a franchise: NW Arkansas. Have you been there recently (of course you haven’t)? There is WalMart Headquarters which possesses the region, so much space, a brand new International Airport, a growing number of retirees, and a million people there now with nothing to do. Razorbacks sports are not the powerhouse they used to be, and the only other sports option is a Royals minor league team.
They need to do more west teams.. Oregon could have an nfl.. or Utah.. chargers need to go back to San Diego.. St. Louis was a good area. Could do Nebraska..
100% Portland could support an NFL team.... it's weird Portland doesn't even have an NHL team... like...Austin should have NFL and Portland should have NHL...it's weird....Seattle still doesn't have an NBA team....but MEMPHIS does? Dumb. Toronto does't have an NFL team...but Buffalo does...BUFFALO? WILD.
Oakland has blown it and lost their team twice now. Since they have not demonstrated a willingness to financially support a team, they do NOT deserve another. Same for St. Louis, they've failed twice now too.
I’m glad this is just your stinking opinion. I’ve been a Chargers fan since 1972. It broke my heart when they left San Diego but if they left the state that would piss me off even more. Damn you.
I get that New Jersey isn’t the best place for an nfl team’s home but tell me where would you put a stadium? There’s no other place in or near nyc, every space is filled with housing
This region of the country has a lot of college football, so they don't need an NFL franchise, while this part of the country also has a lot of college football so they definitely need an NFL franchise! 🙄🙄🙄
It is the typical bias against the South. Even though the South is the only region that is booming, and even though the South has 35% of the nation's population, far more than any other region, these types want to claim the South needs fewer teams, when the South is already too short of teams in all major league sports. Meanwhile, up in the Midwest, any middle sized city, such as Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Indianapolis has teams. In baseball it is especially pronounced with the Midwest having 9 MLB teams amongst a combined 68 million Midwest population, while the South only has five MLB teams, but only one outside of Texas or Florida, yet the region has 134 million people. When you look at fan support, even in hockey, southern markets do better in attendance than any other region. What is crazy is that he wants to remove Carolina when Charlotte has 3 million people and will probably have 4 million by 2040, yet Pittsburgh has 2.2 million, KC has 2.2 million, Cincinnati has 3.3 million. Columbus has 2.2 million. He wants to give Ohio a third team and remove the only North Carolina team when in ten years North Carolina will have a larger population than Ohio.
Oklahoma is a big time football state,the OU VS OSU rivalry is one of the boggest,and the classic red river rivalry between OU and texas,you cant forget tulsa,a great team thats forgotten And move carolina to oklahoma
I can think of several cities that deserve a franchise that wasn’t listed; Birmingham, AL being 1. Also Orlando, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, & Honolulu.
Buffalo is building a new stadium without a roof to perpetuate the cartoon version of NFL football that we saw tonight played between the Bills and 49ers in a snowstorm.
Toronto Ontario deserves a NFL team. The population is 2.8 million and the metro population is 6.2 million. The Golden Horseshoe ( Niagara Falls to Toronto) population is 7.7 million at its core and just over 9 million in its greater area. Most of the Buffalo Bills home games are from Ontario Canada. At one time there was talk of moving the Bills from Buffalo to Toronto.
LMAO NOOOO! I'm a native (Houstonian all ny life) Austin Does NOT deserve an NFL team. Go down the road to San Antonio. They always seem to have a good turn out with the Cowboys go there and practice. I think they deserve it more than Austin.
St.Louis certainly dose deserve a NFL team again the Rams won a Super Bowl Championship in 1999 as the Greatest Show On Turf so bring it back to Missouri! 6:28
So oakland, the city that couldnt keep 3 teams? What a joke😂😂 i dont think charlotte is the issue so much as its the team owner🤷♂️ but definitely think st louis and san diego deserve teams
Washington should lose both NFL and NBA Teams. Does anyone really watches both the Wizards and the artist formally known as the Redskins? The Wizards are a very forgotten team that tried to make stars like Gilbert Arenas and John Wall. But once they were injured, the team had been easily left forgotten. Washington is not a winning sports franchise anymore. They’d be better off doing college football instead.
Move teams from 3 of the fastest growing areas in the country in Nashville, Jacksonvile and Charlotte? Everyone moves there from other parts of the country.Takes some meds amd give it some time...
Stupid video! Leave NY? Every game is sold out. Y,all know nothing about Jacksonville and the Jaguars. The Jaguars have not been flirting with moving to London. The media wishes it, they didn't think Jacksonville deserved the team in 1995. Jaguars play an annual home game in London because the NFL makes them. When was the last time there was a blackout in Jacksonville, 2012? The team placed tarps in the upper deck to make the # seat equal other stadiums. 72k seat is alot, they took it down to 60k. The team and city are doing a billion $ stadium makeover. Leaving? I don't think so
The Raiders back in the days when they were in Oakland was one of if not the absolute BEST passionate fan base in the NFL as the Black Hole because they've won Super Bowl's in case they won rather if they go on the Road at the same time what's not to love about the Raiders in Oakland? I would love to see it back in the Bay Area but now there in Las Vegas already! 1:35
Nashville is currently building a Domed Stadium for the Titans…here to stay, Also We held the draft record until the 2024 Draft held by Detroit. Nashville is definitely a sports city and will host many sporting events once the dome is built. Your preview of Nashville is really off the mark and is the hub of the Mid-South.
I don't believe that the Giants and Jets should lose their franchise of teams in New York in the future because the Giants are now already celebrated it's 100th Anniversary one of the greatest historical of a team in the history of the franchise with all 8 Championships as a team but the Jets does have one Super Bowl Championship from 1968 as well! 10:18
The NJ /NYC suburbs are fine. Most NYC employment actually commutes from New Jersey. It's not the location, but Meet Death Stadium. NYC deserves what the Bears are going to get.
LMFAO....you think the Jaguars will STAY in Jacksonville until 2057? Seriously...I know what the stadium deal said....just use your head. Do you ACTUALLY think Jacksonville will have an NFL team in 30 years??? Probably not.
@@sampicano I don’t think you understand what a lease is. The jags will be in Jacksonville until at least then. They aren’t going anywhere for the foreseeable future.
@@Shineysculpture1 I don’t think you understand what a lease is. The Arizona Coyotes will be in Phoenix at Mullet arena until 2027....when their lease expires. OH WAIT THEY ALREADY RELCOATED TO UTAH....TURNS OUT I KNOW MORE THAN YOU ACTUALLY
Gotta say that the city I was born and raised in deserves a NFL team, put the chargers back in San Diego and the Raiders back in Oakland. Bring the NFL to Richmond Virginia
The issue is which cities have money and interest in football. Those with money will build a suitable stadium and have fans with disposable income. Cities in California, or Saint Louis, don’t have a financial base.
Exactly, Columbus city limits encompass the entire Franklin county area. If Cincinnati were to incorporate the entire area of Hamilton County, it’s population would exceed 850,000.
You nailed it on LA its not an NFL town, but they have 2 teams, if its because they have too much to do in LA then take their teams away! The NFL has 3 teams in a noncrazed football state! You got it wrong in Texas, it should be SAN ANTONIO and not Austin for an NFL team. SA is hot bed for football and we should have a team, we even built a domed stadium in hopes an NFL team would come. When Hurricane Katrina hit SA hosted the New Orleans Saints and they played a game here too, the game sold out in minutes! Some think its Jerry Jones that doesn't want to divide the football revenue in 3 ways if SA got a team. Our NBA Spurs are known as one of the best run franchises of all sports!
@@MrBlue3rd I think people are giving the ufl less credit than what it deserves. St. Louis is a great football city if they just brighten up the dome a little bit
@@MrBlue3rd The Rams did not fail. LA had ZERO teams....11 million people. St. Louis was like....2.6 million when they relocated. 2.6 OR 11...which is more? That doesn't mean St. Louis can't support NFL...look at the XFL attendances...that city LOVESSSSS football. They never had bad attendances, or bad valuations...just LA (the second largest city in America) was a better market...yeah obviously.
St Louis needs a team that is birthed there. Not some team that they act as foster parents to. Then they should get a name that is reflective of the city. Like the St Louis Drive-bys, St Louis Thin Slices, St Louis Humidity :)
I've been knowing the Jacksonville Jaguars franchise since I was 8 years old in 1995 the same year that the Carolina Panthers was a new franchise team to the NFL even though I never hated Jaguars as a football team they been to all 3 trips to the AFC Championship Games but never been to the Super Bowl not once but it would be nice if Jacksonville did play in a Super Bowl and win it all but I do believe it's time to pull the plug! 4:00
You've thrown out some interesting ideas, but I don't think most of them would work. Many people say that Jerry Jones will do everything in his power to keep more teams out of Texas. If that's true, I see no chance that the NFL will defy Jones and put a team in Austin. If they were going to put a team in that general area, they might put the team in San Antonio. They might even build a stadium between Austin and San Antonio and call the team the Texas something-or-another. I hated the alliteration of the name Tennessee Titans, and I would hate the alliteration of Texas Titans. Maybe the only good thing about Jerry Jones keeping another team out of Texas would be avoiding the "Texas Titans" becoming a team. If Jerry Jones has the power to keep the NFL from having a third Texas franchise, I suspect that he'd be able to keep a team out of Oklahoma City. Jones seems to think that he owns Oklahoma City as well. Maybe he would accept a team close to Tulsa. If the team's stadium were on I-44 on the OKC side of Tulsa and called the Oklahoma something-or-other, maybe that could work. Oklahoma City fans could still drive to the stadium in a reasonable amount of time. If I were an owner, I wouldn't want to compete with the Oklahoma Sooners and Oklahoma State Cowboys in the city of Oklahoma City. I agree that giving St. Louis a franchise would be good. I've heard that support for the football team wasn't always quite as strong as what you claim. When St. Louis had the Cardinals, people in the area were speaking of the baseball team when they said "Cardinals." If someone said "Cardinals" referencing the football team, they would say, "Oh, you mean the football Cardinals." Even so, I wouldn't mind seeing St. Louis get another football team. If the Carolina Panthers moved to St. Louis, they could change the name to "Cougars" because that's a more common name for mountain lions. I have nothing against an NFL team in Columbus, Ohio, but I'm less certain than you are about the success of that project. Soccer and hockey are not major sports in the USA, particularly soccer. That Columbus has supported a soccer team is irrelevant. Columbus is not that long a drive from Cincinnati, and I suspect that most people in the area are Bengals fans. I wouldn't want to compete against Ohio State for a football fan base. I don't know whether Oakland is ready for another NFL franchise. Many people in the area might say that they are, but I'm a little skeptical. I think "Tennessee Titans" was a stupid name for a football team, but I don't think that the city has done as poorly as you suggest. I wouldn't be quite so quick to insist that they move. Now that Dan Snyder has let go of the Washington team, the Panthers' owner seems to be in a competition with Jerry Jones to see who can be the worst owner in the league. I think the guy had ties to that area, so he's less likely to move the team on his own. If he sold the team, maybe the new ownership would make a move. I could see letting them go to St. Louis. I can see wanting to move the Jaguars out of Jacksonville. I can see wanting to move the Chargers out of Los Angeles. I can't really see moving the Jets and Giants out of East Rutherford. Real estate in the area is just too expensive to build a stadium easily.
Chargers belong in San Diego. Nuff said
The only way I'll welcome them back is with a new owner whose last name better be something other than Spanos.
Facts
Their roots are in Los Angeles!!
@@jsivco3sivco785 they played there for one season
@@jsivco3sivco785
Yeah, but only for their first season. Historically they're a San Diego team.
Why did they even leave SD?
So Nashville shouldn’t have an NFL team because it’s in SEC country but Austin and Columbus should get one. No owner in their right mind would want to compete with Texas and Ohio state. Titans biggest in city competitor is Vanderbilt. The argument against Nashville having a team is why Austin and Columbus don’t have one and probably never will
TPS isn't the sharpest.
@@IG8282-q9h The same channel that said the Florida Panthers should relocate for many years up until they won it all. I would like to see a big 4 teams who should relocate, post Coyotes and A's, I wonder how they're reacting for Utah over Quebec City.
@@IG8282-q9h They also said that the Florida Panthers should relocate until they won the cup, I would like to see a teams who should relocate list (Post Coyotes and Post A's), watch them say the Utah team should move to Quebec and the Sacramento Kings, Rays, and Jaguars.
And they're building a new stadium in Nashville.
I live in Ohio and don't want a team in Columbus Ohio
TPS will do anything to hate on the Tennessee Titans😭
Exactly it’s so strange #TITANUP!
They're bigots against Nashville as notice how they praised Austin as almost the same in every way to Nashville but they think Austin deserves a team and Nashville doesn't. I live in NW Alabama and can tell you that the Titans do a piss poor job of winning over fans here although we're supposedly in their market. There's no merchandising, no events... nothing. But if you put a team in Austin, they'd do the same thing to the communities in their market. The NFL as a whole does a bad job in most markets but I'd support the Titans if they showed any concern to support us which they don't. But still, I don't understand the hate on Nashville when TPS basically identifies Austin as your ugly twin sister and states they deserve a team but Nashville doesn't.
TPS Isn't even trying to hide it anymore. They straight up just HATE the Titans and the city of Nashville in general
Should keep Rams in LA but send Chargers back to SD
100%
Tijuana has 2.9 million people...they always talk about expanding into the Mexican market....yet completely abandoned it...
Massively stupid.
(Same with Toronto....no Toronto, Canada does NOT cheer for Buffalo, New York...there are more COWBOYS fans in Toronto than Bills fans...put a team in Toronto it's twice the population of San Diego...)
True then put the panthers in st louis
@@nathanmitchell9148 panthers should stay in charlotte they just need better ownership
Why the hell would there be an nfl team in Austin ? They’d have to compete with Dallas & Houston makes absolutely zero sense! 😂
Rams back to St. Louis
Rams are already a step or two ahead of the Chargers in rebuilding its LA fanbase.
The rams are las team they should never have even left la before the chargers should never left San Diego
This video is just awful. Austin, Columbus, and the OKC area have massive college football, but expecting the same people to shell out even more $ for an NFL team as well is absurd. Charlotte draws well when they have capable ownership, which they don't have at the moment. Salt Lake City and San Antonio make more sense than your other choices.
I’d change Austin to San Antonio Texas because we have more room as well as one of the most loyal fan bases out there and is growing quickly as well
If it hadn't been for hurricane Katrina yall would've gotten the Saints.
@@jeffharper9854 yeah we’ve been wanting a team for a while I mean yes we have a ufl team and we love our team but it’s not an nfl team
Austin is too close to Dallas
@@58twright
It's really not... and for some reason, Austin is Texans and Astros territory.
(Actually, it IS closer to Houston, now that I think about it.)
I'd go with New Braunfels and meet halfway in between.
Build there...40 min drive to Austin, 40 min drive to San Antonio
Probably the best location on EARTH for another NFL team.
Call em the Texas _______.
You are really contradicting yourself calling a college football town like Nashville not deserving an NFL yet saying college football towns like Austin, OKC and Columbus deserve an NFL team , so why do Austin, OKC and Columbus deserve an NFL while Nashville does not!?!?! as for Oakland, they had over 2 decades to come up with a plan to replace the coliseum that all parties involved could accept and failed while Las Vegas offered a stadium solution in a year!
They never went to Nashville and it shows. We're more than just known as the Music City.
I live in OKC and can absolutely say Nashville is deserving of the titans. The new stadium is gonna be awesome and Music city does rally around the titans
Instead of Austin we need San Antonio to have an NFL team IT'S BIGGER THAN DALLAS!!!!!
@@Zrich98 IKR
I thought that, too. Actually, other than Jacksonville, I totally disagreed with the "should lose their team" list.
i bet if oakland and st louis still had teams you'd be saying they should lose it because of their stadiums. These opinion video's used to be good but have taken a massive dive in quality in recently years.......
Yeah a lot of there videos are not really good anymore
... these videos* (plural, no apostrophe)
@@VedPatel-n2p ... a lot of their* videos
Oakland should lose it's team...not because of the stadium....but because other cities on Earth exist.
Oakland is a literal hell hole... That's why they are losing all their pro teams.
yea to Vegas on the strip. All on a concentrated area
Jesus Christ, Ohio is crowded with 2 nfl teams. The thought of 3 of them would really be crazy. True, I love the captial, but 😂 wow, would it be insane if there was a third.
The bengals might move to Columbus in 2026.
@anthonyrivera4735 The thought of 3 NFL teams in ohio is whats crazy
@@anthony_rivera4735 I would cry if that happened
And that’s why MLS only has teams in Columbus and Cincinnati. Cleveland could work but that’s already 2 for Ohio.
Move one of the Ohio teams
Were you around for the draft in Nashville? This town supports their teams. Always a sellout at Nissan!! Not to mention, over $2B is going into a new stadium. The Titans are here to stay..
Fax. That just shows you how much they know about Tennessee.
... over $2B are* going into a new stadium
@@einundsiebenziger5488 thanks for the correction! So glad you are here to help!
They love lying! TPS IS THE WROST . I live in Nashville, and have for the last 28 years. The Titans are extremely beloved, and always sell out . Idk where they get their information from
@@AhmadZaShad They've never been here and just go off of what the media says.
Aren't the Titans getting a huge new stadium?
Yes, and the Jags as well.
Yes and the Jags are getting a major renovation that will keep them in Jacksonville till 2035
Oakland doesnt deserve SheEEet. first and last game i attended left in a tow truck cause someone took a knife to the car tires ... XD the entire population is just garbage. not good dudes prolly the worst fan base etc . didnt they throw beer on players in the 80's ?
@@fantasybeast7202
I saw the Raiders play in Oakland back in 2002 and the stadium and facilities were a pile of crap.
TPS hates the titans, we love our team and our home. Hard working blue collar people worked hard for our team and deserve it.
Idk why we are always targets #TITANUP!
Thats fine, we hate tps
San Diego deserves a team
If SD can build a stadium, perhaps the Jags can relocate there.
The Chargers should go back
@@steveb7429 That could be a possibility, only if Spanos sells the team.
I’m from NYC and need someone to explain to me WHERE in NYC we could fit an NFL stadium. They’re in NJ for a reason. SMH.
It's not so much the city, just so long as it's in the state within reasonable driving distance.
Why not have one team actually in New York, while the other stays in New Jersey?
To me, that would be the best and most reasonable solution.
@carloskreek7419 East Rutherford is 12 miles from Manhattan. The realistic places to build an NFL stadium on the New York side would be in Westchester County or Long Island, neither which of is a more reasonable drive. It ain't that damn hard to get to New Jersey.
@@DarkSideMaceWindu The problem is that no team should be calling itself New York and playing in New Jersey. They should just be the New Jersey Giants and The New Jersey Jets.
@DarkSideMaceWindu Honestly, I've only been to New York City, but just as a quick trip. Didn't get long enough to familiarize myself with it.
I was merely giving my observation of having two teams supposedly in new York but they're in New Jersey. Makes you wonder why they aren't referred to as "New Jersey" Jets and Giants.
At least the Chargers and Rams teams are both in LA.
@DarkSideMaceWindu and as far as reasonable drive. At least it would be on the New York side. 🤪
As long as you support your team, keep it up.
Oakland is a complete shit hole that shouldn't have any team. The Chargers need to go back to SD or get out of CA. And screw OKC, bring a team to Tulsa.
Titans can't thrive in a college area... Austin Columbus and OkC are huge college footballs cities.. so they should work... ummmm....what?
Also states that don't need more football teams California,Texas, Florida, Ohio, and New York.
New York State only has one team, no matter where the Jets and Giants played in the past. Besides, outside of the Buffalo area and NYC area, there isn't an area in NYS that could support an NFL team, and Buffalo can't support a second team, so I think NYS is not getting another team.
@@MikeyKaos716 @kennystrawser3220 Right. The NFL is not gonna put a team in Albany or Rochester, or (insert an other NY town here). Other than Buffalo, the other cities and media markets in the state just aren't big enough, and Rochester is too close to Buffalo to justify it, anyway.
The good news…..your city is getting an NFL franchise. The bad news…..it’s owned by David Tepper.
Oakland doesnt deserve SheEEet. first and last game i attended left in a tow truck cause someone took a knife to the car tires ... XD the entire population is just garbage. not good dudes prolly the worst fan base etc . didnt they throw beer on players in the 80's ?
Yeah everybody trashes the Eagles for shit that happened 30 years ago yes we shouldn't have cheer when Michael Irvin was hurt but the Texans fans cheered when Matt Schaub got hurt who was their own quarterback because they wanted him benched then you have the Cowboys a few years ago throwing drinks at their own players because they lost a playoff game and niners and Oakland fans have killed people!!!! @@fantasybeast7202
The Panthers aren't leaving Charlotte.
@@theinconspicuousbxcagree panthers are staying in Charlotte
@@theinconspicuousbxc I like the panthers but I think it would be better if they were in Raleigh instead.
This list is a bunch of garbage and TPS is as well. Nashville is a great city for football and us Titans fans are large, crazy and proud! Obviously no one at TPS has been to a game instead of hanging in their mom’s basement.
The Rams were in LA for nearly 50 years before they were ripped from LA and moved to St. Louis. Kronke just moved them back to where they belong. Anyone that says otherwise needs to check the history of the Rams. And it's only because of the fact that they were ripped out of LA for 2 decades that they lost their LA fan base...🙄🙄🙄🙄
Ok well if we’re doing that then they should be in Cleveland cause that’s where they started
Cleveland has the Browns, Howard. That's enough for any group of fans. The stupid thing is saying St. Louis should have a franchise. Twice they've had NFL teams, twice they've left for greener pastures. St. Louis is a baseball town, always has been, always will be.
@@jimmydavis8617 LA is a basketball town
@@jimmydavis8617 The Rams and chargers also have to compete with USC and UCLA. If ownership was better and they took care of the stadium they would still be in ST Louis and would probably be fine
I think the Rams should stay in LA, but not the Chargers too.
Personally - I don't have a problem with the Giants & Jets in East Rutherford New Jersey. It's right across the river of Manhattan with a great view of the New York Skyline. It's an area that packs the sell out crowds and has a world class mall across the highway, Tons of luxury Hotels near the area and a short drive to the Airports. The Giants have tons of fans in the Garden State as well as the Big Apple. The Jets have growing fans in the Jersey area and a ton of fans in New York. From that area - Both teams get the support of 2 cities. That makes it good for business. You may not like the location, But Face the Facts - It Works. 🤑🤑
Manhattan*
Man doesn’t know the area there is nowhere else to put a stadium in nyc
Yes and you can catch a train to the game. They need to open up that Dream place
@@dannygoldberger19 2 much traffic they shut down the Jets proposal for the west side a while ago
@@bradleysample3246 The American Dream is always open, But their parking is always closed during stadium events to avoid any additional traffic. Building a sports & entertainment complex on the secluded Jersey side of the Metro area is alot better than building it at the heart of New Yorks legendary traffic.
Raiders Should've Stayed In Oakland
Rams Should've Stayed In St. Louis
Chargers Should've Stayed In San Diego
Oilers Should've Stayed In Houston
Rams should stay in Los Angeles
@@coreylevine8095 I Disagree Los Angeles Has Never Been A Football City. It's Been More Of A Basketball & Baseball City.
@@brentbare7280 Don't care. It's the 2nd largest city in the US. It gets at least one NFL team whether you cry about it or not.
I miss the Oilers
As a columbus native we don’t need an nfl team. We already have enough construction as it is. Almost everyone living here is either a browns, bengals, or steelers fans. It’s a perfect balance and throwing in a new team will just feel weird. Nobody here has ever wanted to have an nfl team. But we do want an NBA team.
The bengals might move to Columbus in 2026.
San Antonio, Texas hands down needs a NFL team. We already hosted the NO Saints after hurricane Katrina
California and texas already have enough football teams
Texas only has 2, with a massive population, they could easily host a 3rd team
And Ohio.
California and Texas have teams because of other Sports Leauges merge like the NFL,AAFC,and AFL
California and Texas have teams because of other Sports Leauges merge like the NFL,AAFC,and AFL
@@coreylevine8095 sports leagues*
I think San Diego deserves a team. Chargers should honestly leave LA.
Oakland doesn't deserve an NFL team, or any professional team, until it cleans itself up.
Agreed
Oakland does not need a franchise. For that matter California does not need another franchise.
When I saw the city I'm from in the thumbnail, I already knew this video was BS. You do realize the Titans are getting a new stadium right? You never mention that in videos. Same for the Jags. No one gives a fuck about Vanderbilt. There are way more Vols fans around the state and UT is in Knoxville. Why is Columbus on the list? The Buckeyes are way too iconic so it doesn't need an NFL team. Have you ever been to Nashville? Apparently not since you ALWAYS miss the mark every time you talk about the Titans.
No one does research on videos like this.
- It's NEVER about who "deserves" a team when it comes to sports leagues. It's all about what's the best business decision.
- Oakland is a dying, shrinking city. They're losing all their sports teams for a reason. If it ever gets better, again, it's going to take a couple *decades* before they're even looked at for expansion/relocation.
- Nashville is literally building a new stadium right now. They broke ground in March.
- If and when Texas gets a 3rd team, it's going to San Antonio, more than likely. That city packed a decrepit Alamodome for minor league teams.
- Columbus has no real shot at anything other than _maybe_ an NBA team, and even that would be a reach.
- You fail to mention that St. Louis lost about 4 NFL teams and only kept all 4 for relatively short periods of time. Rams for 20 years, Cardinals for 27, Gunners for 9 and All-stars for like a couple months.
- There is no room in actual NYC for an NFL sized stadium, unless they tear buildings down to make room... and there's only so many buildings you can demolish (or be allowed to) in that city. It's unrealistic to think that anywhere else other than the New Jersey suburbs are suitable for the Jets and Giants.
The only thing from this video I agree with is Jacksonville, but even they're building something for their stadium to keep them around.
And the Chargers should be in San Diego. The Rams are the "Legacy Franchise" in L.A. . . . one is enough for them. But if they had to have a 2nd team, it should have been the Raiders.
The fault in your list is that the Titans are getting a new Stadium and the Jaguars are renovating theirs. Only obvious "lose" from your list is the Panthers.
cant afford to move so the population drop in oakland those years death and now with regulation adv in medicine etc less death = population growth. absolute bad place hate the raidur bandwagoners coming to santa clara ngl #Goaway , #Giveallyourmoneytovegas :D
The other 31 owners would never allow David Tepper to move the Panthers out of Charlotte. Besides that, the city of Charlotte agreed to help fund renovations to BoA Stadium.
There more of a chance that the jags move the the panthers
I live in Charlotte and it is far from an obvious loss. The city is growing and the corporate presence is here along with a prime stadium location. Charlotte is not unique that it will see less butts in the seats when the team sucks.
At least you do not suggest an expansion. 32 teams are really enough. But asking both NFL teams to move away from LA is just nuts. The Rams were there from 1946 to 1994 and returned after a 22-year "stopover" in St. Louis. The Chargers though still have more fans in San Diego than they (probably ever will) have in LA.
Please do 5 cities that deserve a MLB franchise. And 5 that should lose theirs?
I pick these cities to have NFL teams; Hibbing Minnesota (Da-range), Rapid City South Dakota, Billings, Montana, Portland Oregon, Boise Idaho, Little Rock Arkansas, Salt Lake City Utah, Minot North Dakota, Ames, Iowa, just for starters to mix up and offer those future fans a base since they're not recognized.
Grew up in Hibbing, MN No way that area could sustain an NFL franchise even if you located it in Duluth. Besides, Minnesota can't sustain two NFL franchises. Possibly De Moines. Iowa has the Hawkeyes in Iowa City, however. Arkansas is college football country. Maybe Portland or Salt Lake City. Even those cities would be a stretch.
Salt lake is the only one on this possible as in portland thwir surrounded by 3 california market teams and up above them they have seattle seahawks. So logistically portland wont work
The Chargers belong in San Diego and never should have moved. Austin or San Antonio do deserve a team. As for moving the Titans out of Nashville, you’d have to be on meth to think that will ever happen. Or should. Insane.
st. louis also didn't deserve to lose their team...I get LA was too big to pass on....but now LA is oversaturated with NFL teams...meanwhile st. louis XFL games average almost 40,000 people...
and toronto-hamilton (7,281,694)...is larger than San Antonio AND Austin combined....(San Antonio-Austin - 5,258,922)
Canada loves NFL. Toronto hates CFL. CFL is not a real league. Toronto HATES Buffalo...like the cities are rivals...nobody cheers for Buffalo...there are more Cowboys fans in Toronto. Plus the NFL price gouged Toronto with $180 dollar average ticket prices....no American would pay that LOL Superbowl prices....to see the Bills in 2007 HAHAHAHA...obviously people were pissed...Toronto would cheer for a TORONTO team, or CANADIAN team...not a rival city LMFAO)
Imagine the Houston Texans moving to Austin and calling themselves the "Austin Texans" That actually has a nice ring to it.
Laughable. Why would the Texans leave the 4th biggest city in the US with a football tradition for Austin. The NFL isnt gonna leave Houston again.
@@TexasLegend101 I'm not saying they would, Just that the name has a nice ring to it.
You said it, there are already two teams in Ohio.
Milwaukee football fans have no problems with their Wisconsin team being a couple hours of drive away.
Saying Nashville should lose the Titans while Columbus should get a team is idiotic. Absolutely nobody in Columbus is ditching the Brown, Bengals or Steelers for a random team.
I agree BAD city choice.
But obviously people in Columbus, the largest city in Ohio would cheer for THEIR NFL TEAM...not the Browns or Bengals lol
It is still a bad choice. But that's not how cities work...people cheer for the HOME TEAM haha
The fact is as long as Roger Goodell is the NFL commissioner I highly doubt any NFL teams will relocate or will get a new team
I really love to see the fans in St.Louis get's a NFL franchise team but what name should it be called? 7:00
The BattleHawks. (Kaw kaw is the law!)
If any city deserves an NFL Team, It's St. Louis.
Tennessee actually has a booming economy though and he has good management and is able to support a football team that way for Oakland. I’m not so sure.
Rams definitely have a big fanbase in Los Angeles, and. The market is so much more desirable in LA over St Louis. Glad the Rams returned back to their main city of LA.
Here is one you DID MISSED: Nothing ever gets done in Washington. Least of all a stadium deal. It would be ideal to move the Commanders to St. Louis and give them a better name. At least they would be in a position to have a decent stadium and set them up for some respectibility.
Or, ya know, just move the Rams back to St. Louis from LA...
Birmingham, Alabama the home of the Stallions 3 time spring football champions
Says Titans should move. But only shows Houston Oiler photos
I love how TPS always says "Poor St. Louis lost the Rams" They took the Rams away from LA after they were in SoCal for almost 50 years in the first place!!! That caused a whole generation of people like me who were born in the 90s in LA to either not watch the NFL or bandwagon onto the Cowboys, Packers, 49ers, Patriots or Chiefs or some other random team (Cuz thr Raiders went back to Oakland basically at the same time). LA is also a massive city that lots of people relocate to. Hence why the opposing teams fans always show up in masses
He’s not wrong. I’m not even from STL and I know they deserve their team back!!!!
@@a.grimes4202 The Cardinals not the Rams
@@coreylevine8095 St. Louis Cardinals baseball team still exists, WDYM?
@@a.grimes4202 Arizona Cardinals
@@a.grimes4202 And they also existed when the Cardinals of the NFL were in St. Louis from 1960-1987 so WTFDYM?
What would you nickname a team from Austin, okc, or Columbus?
OKC should go back to the name and logo from when Tulsa had a USFL team, The Oklahoma Outlaws!
For Columbus, I would go with Knights.
Maybe Austin could buy the rights to the Oilers' name, logo, and colors. The Austin Oilers
While I'm at it, For years I've thought that if St. Louis ever gets a new team, that the St. Louis Archers would make a great name! By Archers, I mean the bow and arrow type. It, of course, also brings up the cities best landmark, The Gateway Arch.
Or the Houston Texans could move to Boston and rebrand as the oilers.
As an L.A. resident, we should lose the chargers only. I am obviously a Rams guy.
Again showing you all don't know much about football or these teams. Jags just agreed to a new stadium so they are not going anywhere
Same for the Titans. This channel is a joke.
I agree
Portland, Oregon deserves a team. They were about to be awarded a team (that became the Seahawks with the Kingdome) back in the day. Think about it . Built in rivalry with Seattle and Frisco. Build a Dome in the Delta Park area and draw from a larger region.
About an hour and a half East of Oklahoma City is where you can put a franchise: NW Arkansas.
Have you been there recently (of course you haven’t)? There is WalMart Headquarters which possesses the region, so much space, a brand new International Airport, a growing number of retirees, and a million people there now with nothing to do.
Razorbacks sports are not the powerhouse they used to be, and the only other sports option is a Royals minor league team.
They need to do more west teams.. Oregon could have an nfl.. or Utah..
chargers need to go back to San Diego.. St. Louis was a good area. Could do Nebraska..
100% Portland could support an NFL team....
it's weird Portland doesn't even have an NHL team...
like...Austin should have NFL and Portland should have NHL...it's weird....Seattle still doesn't have an NBA team....but MEMPHIS does? Dumb.
Toronto does't have an NFL team...but Buffalo does...BUFFALO? WILD.
The city of San Francisco should have an NFL stadium
San Francisco is a wasteland of homeless and criminals
Oakland has blown it and lost their team twice now. Since they have not demonstrated a willingness to financially support a team, they do NOT deserve another. Same for St. Louis, they've failed twice now too.
Lost the warriors.. raiders, in and out burger. Nobody fucking with oakland anymore
How disingenuous to show mostly Houston footage and talk a lot about the Houston Oilers while talking about why the team should leave Nashville.
Video idea: NFL Players who would’ve been good if not for injuries
I’m glad this is just your stinking opinion. I’ve been a Chargers fan since 1972. It broke my heart when they left San Diego but if they left the state that would piss me off even more. Damn you.
The Oilers should never have left Houston.
I get that New Jersey isn’t the best place for an nfl team’s home but tell me where would you put a stadium? There’s no other place in or near nyc, every space is filled with housing
Couldn't they build it in the state of New York though, say 20 miles from the city?
This region of the country has a lot of college football, so they don't need an NFL franchise, while this part of the country also has a lot of college football so they definitely need an NFL franchise! 🙄🙄🙄
It is the typical bias against the South.
Even though the South is the only region that is booming, and even though the South has 35% of the nation's population, far more than any other region, these types want to claim the South needs fewer teams, when the South is already too short of teams in all major league sports. Meanwhile, up in the Midwest, any middle sized city, such as Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Indianapolis has teams. In baseball it is especially pronounced with the Midwest having 9 MLB teams amongst a combined 68 million Midwest population, while the South only has five MLB teams, but only one outside of Texas or Florida, yet the region has 134 million people.
When you look at fan support, even in hockey, southern markets do better in attendance than any other region.
What is crazy is that he wants to remove Carolina when Charlotte has 3 million people and will probably have 4 million by 2040, yet Pittsburgh has 2.2 million, KC has 2.2 million, Cincinnati has 3.3 million. Columbus has 2.2 million. He wants to give Ohio a third team and remove the only North Carolina team when in ten years North Carolina will have a larger population than Ohio.
Oklahoma is a big time football state,the OU VS OSU rivalry is one of the boggest,and the classic red river rivalry between OU and texas,you cant forget tulsa,a great team thats forgotten
And move carolina to oklahoma
I can think of several cities that deserve a franchise that wasn’t listed; Birmingham, AL being 1. Also Orlando, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, & Honolulu.
San Diego should In The List That Deserves An NFL Football Team
The entire state of Alabama needs a NFL team. There’s more than enough population to support it.
Except people in Alabama are poor
Buffalo is building a new stadium without a roof to perpetuate the cartoon version of NFL football that we saw tonight played between the Bills and 49ers in a snowstorm.
Yeah one city you guys missed was San Antonio Texas that city deserves a team 10 fold
I don't disagree, but Jacksonville signed an agreement to stay in Jacksonville for 30 years.
Toronto Ontario deserves a NFL team. The population is 2.8 million and the metro population is 6.2 million. The Golden Horseshoe ( Niagara Falls to Toronto) population is 7.7 million at its core and just over 9 million in its greater area. Most of the Buffalo Bills home games are from Ontario Canada. At one time there was talk of moving the Bills from Buffalo to Toronto.
LMAO NOOOO! I'm a native (Houstonian all ny life) Austin Does NOT deserve an NFL team. Go down the road to San Antonio. They always seem to have a good turn out with the Cowboys go there and practice. I think they deserve it more than Austin.
St.Louis certainly dose deserve a NFL team again the Rams won a Super Bowl Championship in 1999 as the Greatest Show On Turf so bring it back to Missouri! 6:28
If Oakland couldn't keep the Raiders, why should they get another?
So oakland, the city that couldnt keep 3 teams? What a joke😂😂 i dont think charlotte is the issue so much as its the team owner🤷♂️ but definitely think st louis and san diego deserve teams
I'm pretty sure that the San Diego Fans would love to have Chargers back! 8:26
"Nashville shouldn't have an NFL team because SEC!"
*a few moments later*
"Columbus should have an NFL team because big city!"
Washington should lose both NFL and NBA Teams. Does anyone really watches both the Wizards and the artist formally known as the Redskins? The Wizards are a very forgotten team that tried to make stars like Gilbert Arenas and John Wall. But once they were injured, the team had been easily left forgotten. Washington is not a winning sports franchise anymore. They’d be better off doing college football instead.
Move teams from 3 of the fastest growing areas in the country in Nashville, Jacksonvile and Charlotte? Everyone moves there from other parts of the country.Takes some meds amd give it some time...
I call it anti-southern bias. It has persisted for over a century, despite statistical data showing it is ridiculous.
Stupid video!
Leave NY? Every game is sold out.
Y,all know nothing about Jacksonville and the Jaguars. The Jaguars have not been flirting with moving to London. The media wishes it, they didn't think Jacksonville deserved the team in 1995. Jaguars play an annual home game in London because the NFL makes them. When was the last time there was a blackout in Jacksonville, 2012? The team placed tarps in the upper deck to make the # seat equal other stadiums. 72k seat is alot, they took it down to 60k. The team and city are doing a billion $ stadium makeover.
Leaving? I don't think so
Jags on the list despite getting a major renovation. What a braindead take by a channel that went down hill
Carolina’s problem stems from a horrible owner!. Get a better ownership group that team would be fine.
Yes to OKC!! Finally more people are hoping on the train. Oklahoma deserves an NFL TEAM!!!
The city of Oakland sucks. Leadership matters. There's a reason they lost 3 teams in under 10 years. #Vote4Dan
Chargers should move back to San Diego and I heavily disagree about Oakland getting an expansion team
Exactly. Oakland is a shithole and have lost the NFL twice even with a passionate fanbase
The Raiders back in the days when they were in Oakland was one of if not the absolute BEST passionate fan base in the NFL as the Black Hole because they've won Super Bowl's in case they won rather if they go on the Road at the same time what's not to love about the Raiders in Oakland? I would love to see it back in the Bay Area but now there in Las Vegas already! 1:35
Nashville is currently building a Domed Stadium for the Titans…here to stay, Also We held the draft record until the 2024 Draft held by Detroit. Nashville is definitely a sports city and will host many sporting events once the dome is built. Your preview of Nashville is really off the mark and is the hub of the Mid-South.
I don't believe that the Giants and Jets should lose their franchise of teams in New York in the future because the Giants are now already celebrated it's 100th Anniversary one of the greatest historical of a team in the history of the franchise with all 8 Championships as a team but the Jets does have one Super Bowl Championship from 1968 as well! 10:18
The NJ /NYC suburbs are fine. Most NYC employment actually commutes from New Jersey. It's not the location, but Meet Death Stadium. NYC deserves what the Bears are going to get.
The Jags just signed a new stadium deal that will keep them in town until 2058.
LMFAO....you think the Jaguars will STAY in Jacksonville until 2057?
Seriously...I know what the stadium deal said....just use your head.
Do you ACTUALLY think Jacksonville will have an NFL team in 30 years???
Probably not.
@@sampicano Yes. Because Jacksonville is one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the country.
@@sampicano Funny, people were saying the same thing about Jacksonville thirty years ago.
@@sampicano I don’t think you understand what a lease is. The jags will be in Jacksonville until at least then. They aren’t going anywhere for the foreseeable future.
@@Shineysculpture1 I don’t think you understand what a lease is. The Arizona Coyotes will be in Phoenix at Mullet arena until 2027....when their lease expires.
OH WAIT THEY ALREADY RELCOATED TO UTAH....TURNS OUT I KNOW MORE THAN YOU ACTUALLY
Gotta say that the city I was born and raised in deserves a NFL team, put the chargers back in San Diego and the Raiders back in Oakland. Bring the NFL to Richmond Virginia
The issue is which cities have money and interest in football. Those with money will build a suitable stadium and have fans with disposable income. Cities in California, or Saint Louis, don’t have a financial base.
Isnt Columbus Ohio only that populated because its so big in square miles ?
Yeah, it’s just a giant suburb.
Columbus metro area (suburbs included) has a pop of 2.2 mil. Columbus proper (the city itself) has a pop. Of 900k
Exactly, Columbus city limits encompass the entire Franklin county area. If Cincinnati were to incorporate the entire area of Hamilton County, it’s population would exceed 850,000.
You nailed it on LA its not an NFL town, but they have 2 teams, if its because they have too much to do in LA then take their teams away! The NFL has 3 teams in a noncrazed football state! You got it wrong in Texas, it should be SAN ANTONIO and not Austin for an NFL team. SA is hot bed for football and we should have a team, we even built a domed stadium in hopes an NFL team would come. When Hurricane Katrina hit SA hosted the New Orleans Saints and they played a game here too, the game sold out in minutes! Some think its Jerry Jones that doesn't want to divide the football revenue in 3 ways if SA got a team. Our NBA Spurs are known as one of the best run franchises of all sports!
I could def see the raiders in Austin or San Antonio texas
If the Raiders were to move to one of those cities I’d say they should move to San Antonio, because San Antonio has some good fanbase like the Spurs
Love your video TPS and keep up the great work you are awesome
you miss san diego
So the battlehawks aren’t quenching St. Louis’s thirst for football?
bring in new teams, designate international etc stoked to see the changes happen sooner than later, lets start engineering innovating with Ai #Tech
@paulkowald4057 I hardly expect the NFL will want to go back to St. Louis after both the Cardinals and Rams were there.
@@MrBlue3rd I think people are giving the ufl less credit than what it deserves. St. Louis is a great football city if they just brighten up the dome a little bit
@@MrBlue3rd The Rams did not fail.
LA had ZERO teams....11 million people.
St. Louis was like....2.6 million when they relocated.
2.6 OR 11...which is more?
That doesn't mean St. Louis can't support NFL...look at the XFL attendances...that city LOVESSSSS football.
They never had bad attendances, or bad valuations...just LA (the second largest city in America) was a better market...yeah obviously.
St Louis needs a team that is birthed there. Not some team that they act as foster parents to. Then they should get a name that is reflective of the city. Like the St Louis Drive-bys, St Louis Thin Slices, St Louis Humidity :)
I've been knowing the Jacksonville Jaguars franchise since I was 8 years old in 1995 the same year that the Carolina Panthers was a new franchise team to the NFL even though I never hated Jaguars as a football team they been to all 3 trips to the AFC Championship Games but never been to the Super Bowl not once but it would be nice if Jacksonville did play in a Super Bowl and win it all but I do believe it's time to pull the plug! 4:00
You've thrown out some interesting ideas, but I don't think most of them would work.
Many people say that Jerry Jones will do everything in his power to keep more teams out of Texas. If that's true, I see no chance that the NFL will defy Jones and put a team in Austin. If they were going to put a team in that general area, they might put the team in San Antonio. They might even build a stadium between Austin and San Antonio and call the team the Texas something-or-another. I hated the alliteration of the name Tennessee Titans, and I would hate the alliteration of Texas Titans. Maybe the only good thing about Jerry Jones keeping another team out of Texas would be avoiding the "Texas Titans" becoming a team. If Jerry Jones has the power to keep the NFL from having a third Texas franchise, I suspect that he'd be able to keep a team out of Oklahoma City. Jones seems to think that he owns Oklahoma City as well. Maybe he would accept a team close to Tulsa. If the team's stadium were on I-44 on the OKC side of Tulsa and called the Oklahoma something-or-other, maybe that could work. Oklahoma City fans could still drive to the stadium in a reasonable amount of time. If I were an owner, I wouldn't want to compete with the Oklahoma Sooners and Oklahoma State Cowboys in the city of Oklahoma City.
I agree that giving St. Louis a franchise would be good. I've heard that support for the football team wasn't always quite as strong as what you claim. When St. Louis had the Cardinals, people in the area were speaking of the baseball team when they said "Cardinals." If someone said "Cardinals" referencing the football team, they would say, "Oh, you mean the football Cardinals." Even so, I wouldn't mind seeing St. Louis get another football team. If the Carolina Panthers moved to St. Louis, they could change the name to "Cougars" because that's a more common name for mountain lions.
I have nothing against an NFL team in Columbus, Ohio, but I'm less certain than you are about the success of that project. Soccer and hockey are not major sports in the USA, particularly soccer. That Columbus has supported a soccer team is irrelevant. Columbus is not that long a drive from Cincinnati, and I suspect that most people in the area are Bengals fans. I wouldn't want to compete against Ohio State for a football fan base.
I don't know whether Oakland is ready for another NFL franchise. Many people in the area might say that they are, but I'm a little skeptical.
I think "Tennessee Titans" was a stupid name for a football team, but I don't think that the city has done as poorly as you suggest. I wouldn't be quite so quick to insist that they move.
Now that Dan Snyder has let go of the Washington team, the Panthers' owner seems to be in a competition with Jerry Jones to see who can be the worst owner in the league. I think the guy had ties to that area, so he's less likely to move the team on his own. If he sold the team, maybe the new ownership would make a move. I could see letting them go to St. Louis.
I can see wanting to move the Jaguars out of Jacksonville.
I can see wanting to move the Chargers out of Los Angeles.
I can't really see moving the Jets and Giants out of East Rutherford. Real estate in the area is just too expensive to build a stadium easily.