As Salaamu Alaykum May Allah protect and preserve my Shaykh Dawud Adib his life deen and family. He guided me to true Islam. May Allah be pleased with him and his works. You can’t be erased from our history . The Angels have written it. Wa Alaykum salaam
As salaam alaikaum ahki you definitely was my introduction to salafi through some types i got from bro name umar from west Chester Pennsylvania back in 96
Shaykh Saalih Al-Luhaydan has spoken ill of Hamas prior his death. So the reference to the outdated video shouldn't be mentioned. He has described them as an arm of Iran; and indicated they have clear violations of Usool Ahlussunnah. This is especially true after videos of the founder in allegiance with the heads of Kufr in Iran at the time of founding of Hamas were released by Iran (which dismisses their عذر that Arab countries forsake them; not true. They were in cahoots all along). I am not familiar with the disputes in North America between you and Spubs and Green Lane Masjid and all of that, but there are things I hear that I think I agree with, but at the same time I feel that are not right. Lemme use an analogy before I proceed: if we're in a kafir society where the best Muslimah is one who actively dislikes and doesn't wear a hijab out of ignorance, she is a relative ذات الدين (the article here is for الاستغراق) if I have no other options. But if I have the option to travel elsewhere, or if there are better women if I search a bit more, then that description no longer falls upon her and picking her as a wife would be in error. Her ignorance that leads her to rejecting the Hijab that Allah commanded is sufficient reason to avoid her, لأن السلامةَ لا يعدلها شيء! I agree with you in terms of partial baraa', but if someone violates an Asl of Usool As-Sunnah and contradicts Ahlussunnah and insists upon that even after naseeha, then لا كرامة. His good deeds are his good deeds, no one is denying him that. But if he is stubborn upon violation, if he challenges the Sunnah, sticks to the Bid'ah, then here we draw a line. Acknowledging their good deeds in one thing is something, but preventing any attack on their contradictions, or any call to abandon them as sources of knowledge for having been mixed with a bid'ah (given other alternatives exist) is not correct. I am not sure what exactly you are saying about that, and I find the statements confusing. I get that you're saying that we shouldn't be militant tabdee'is, and I absolutely agree. But at the same time we should be careful not to praise the people of misguidance and let them teach their misguidance. Are you saying to affirm the praise they deserve and not call out their misguidance, warn people from learning from them ( (Given that it has been established, to a degree of clear undebatable misguidance - which is not for the laypeople- and GIVEN that alternative authentic sources of knowledge exist)? There is a threshold for Partial Baraa' beyond which it becomes complete baraa'; and a big part of that is when it is stubbornness and enmity towards the Sunnah (establishing that is not a mere challenge though). We acknowledge that the Tablighis were - by the grace of Allah - a reason for many people to embrace Islam or start praying. But at the same time we accuse them of misguiding people into deobandi-flavoured sufism and hatred of the Sunnah and the Tawheed. They have increased the quantity, but they have eradicated the quality; and the call to Allah has never been about the quantity. But, if my understanding correct, you warn from militant tabdee', the sort tabdee' that does not cut any slack or excuse people for having been brought upon the bid'ah thinking it was a Sunnah. The type of tabdee' that assumes that the hujjah gets established by minimal effort. That they should be advised with patience and leniency. But, my question is, if someone is teaching the people falsehood thinking it is the Sunnah, has been advised about it and dismissed the advice. If they dismissed it out of ignorance and proceeded to "keep doing what they've been doing", are you saying they should not be warned from? What if they dismissed it out of stubbornness and desire (and of course, establishing that is not for us, laypeople, and is not for the delusional)? What if authentic scholars with correct aqeedah are present as an alternative? What if none are? I just want to understand exactly what you are saying because I feel it is not clear. AFAIK (as far as I understood from listening to the Mashayikh such as Shaykh Raslaan and others), the latter (who insisted upon falsehood out of desire) has to be warned from. The earlier (out of ignorance) has to be advised both in private and in public.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Can you please send the link to the recording of Shaykh Luhaydan speaking ill of Hamas and changing his position on them (if you have it). جزاك الله خيرا أخي الفاضل
May be the african american community is aware about the situation of WD Mohammad. But for people like us, who know nothing about the Nation of Islam, I guess are confused about WD Mohammad. If it be possible, could you please clarify what happened to him, what were his deviations, and did he retract from such deviations before his death? What is the present situation of WD Mohammad group now after his death. And what are the difference between WD Mohammads group and Salafiya now? Mohammad Omar Faruq Dhaka, Bangladesh
So because these alleged callers from Africa were not present at Masjid Al-Haq in Baltimore, they were not anywhere else? And by extension, are you implying it was you who brought it?
The "Impact" should be deduced through scholarly investigations (e.g. empirical research, anecdotal evidence, etc.). Instead, you just seem to be shooting from the hip. You cant reference some scholarly works on this subject? Have you produced any?
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
Shaykh Dawoud is setting the standard of how to correct one’s mistakes. The other students and speakers should take note.
As Salaamu Alaykum May Allah protect and preserve my Shaykh Dawud Adib his life deen and family. He guided me to true Islam. May Allah be pleased with him and his works. You can’t be erased from our history . The Angels have written it. Wa Alaykum salaam
May it be accepted as a standard in all the prisons Aameen
Jazak Allah Hu Khayrun Aameen Barik Allah Hu Feekum Aameen
Beautiful dua may accept it from you and us Aameen
Allah guided us from kufr to Islam to the correct Quran and Sunnah and the correct Aqeedah and Menhaj of the Salif
Who doesn't have mistakes?
As salaam alaikaum ahki you definitely was my introduction to salafi through some types i got from bro name umar from west Chester Pennsylvania back in 96
وفقك الله شيخ داود
نفع الله بجهودك
Walaikum As Salaam Wa Rahma Tu Allahi Wa Barakatu
السلام عليكم. Please ask Shaikh Dawud to make mention of Muhammad Jebali, one of the great spreaders of salafiyysh in the late 1980's
Shaykh Saalih Al-Luhaydan has spoken ill of Hamas prior his death. So the reference to the outdated video shouldn't be mentioned. He has described them as an arm of Iran; and indicated they have clear violations of Usool Ahlussunnah. This is especially true after videos of the founder in allegiance with the heads of Kufr in Iran at the time of founding of Hamas were released by Iran (which dismisses their عذر that Arab countries forsake them; not true. They were in cahoots all along).
I am not familiar with the disputes in North America between you and Spubs and Green Lane Masjid and all of that, but there are things I hear that I think I agree with, but at the same time I feel that are not right. Lemme use an analogy before I proceed: if we're in a kafir society where the best Muslimah is one who actively dislikes and doesn't wear a hijab out of ignorance, she is a relative ذات الدين (the article here is for الاستغراق) if I have no other options. But if I have the option to travel elsewhere, or if there are better women if I search a bit more, then that description no longer falls upon her and picking her as a wife would be in error. Her ignorance that leads her to rejecting the Hijab that Allah commanded is sufficient reason to avoid her, لأن السلامةَ لا يعدلها شيء!
I agree with you in terms of partial baraa', but if someone violates an Asl of Usool As-Sunnah and contradicts Ahlussunnah and insists upon that even after naseeha, then لا كرامة. His good deeds are his good deeds, no one is denying him that. But if he is stubborn upon violation, if he challenges the Sunnah, sticks to the Bid'ah, then here we draw a line. Acknowledging their good deeds in one thing is something, but preventing any attack on their contradictions, or any call to abandon them as sources of knowledge for having been mixed with a bid'ah (given other alternatives exist) is not correct. I am not sure what exactly you are saying about that, and I find the statements confusing.
I get that you're saying that we shouldn't be militant tabdee'is, and I absolutely agree. But at the same time we should be careful not to praise the people of misguidance and let them teach their misguidance. Are you saying to affirm the praise they deserve and not call out their misguidance, warn people from learning from them ( (Given that it has been established, to a degree of clear undebatable misguidance - which is not for the laypeople- and GIVEN that alternative authentic sources of knowledge exist)? There is a threshold for Partial Baraa' beyond which it becomes complete baraa'; and a big part of that is when it is stubbornness and enmity towards the Sunnah (establishing that is not a mere challenge though). We acknowledge that the Tablighis were - by the grace of Allah - a reason for many people to embrace Islam or start praying. But at the same time we accuse them of misguiding people into deobandi-flavoured sufism and hatred of the Sunnah and the Tawheed. They have increased the quantity, but they have eradicated the quality; and the call to Allah has never been about the quantity.
But, if my understanding correct, you warn from militant tabdee', the sort tabdee' that does not cut any slack or excuse people for having been brought upon the bid'ah thinking it was a Sunnah. The type of tabdee' that assumes that the hujjah gets established by minimal effort. That they should be advised with patience and leniency. But, my question is, if someone is teaching the people falsehood thinking it is the Sunnah, has been advised about it and dismissed the advice. If they dismissed it out of ignorance and proceeded to "keep doing what they've been doing", are you saying they should not be warned from? What if they dismissed it out of stubbornness and desire (and of course, establishing that is not for us, laypeople, and is not for the delusional)? What if authentic scholars with correct aqeedah are present as an alternative? What if none are? I just want to understand exactly what you are saying because I feel it is not clear.
AFAIK (as far as I understood from listening to the Mashayikh such as Shaykh Raslaan and others), the latter (who insisted upon falsehood out of desire) has to be warned from. The earlier (out of ignorance) has to be advised both in private and in public.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Can you please send the link to the recording of Shaykh Luhaydan speaking ill of Hamas and changing his position on them (if you have it).
جزاك الله خيرا أخي الفاضل
Aameen
As salaamu Alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
May be the african american community is aware about the situation of WD Mohammad.
But for people like us, who know nothing about the Nation of Islam, I guess are confused about WD Mohammad.
If it be possible, could you please clarify what happened to him, what were his deviations, and did he retract from such deviations before his death?
What is the present situation of WD Mohammad group now after his death. And what are the difference between WD Mohammads group and Salafiya now?
Mohammad Omar Faruq
Dhaka, Bangladesh
So because these alleged callers from Africa were not present at Masjid Al-Haq in Baltimore, they were not anywhere else? And by extension, are you implying it was you who brought it?
Moving in silence
The "Impact" should be deduced through scholarly investigations (e.g. empirical research, anecdotal evidence, etc.). Instead, you just seem to be shooting from the hip. You cant reference some scholarly works on this subject? Have you produced any?
'"salafi"," Did the Prophet (P), his companions, and those that came after them in the best of generations use this term?
Did Warith Deen Muhammad refer to himself as a Messengers, or was it others?
Aameen