Although druzhina champs and slavs overall are in my top 5 fav civs and units (slav champs) it still pains me quite a little that they beat my fav uu like samurai and berserk wich are on my top 4 civs/units so i like them more than slav champs... In my opinion they should buff infantry overall but most of all, infantry uu, if i have a infantry uu on an infantry civ, and sometimes is a replacement for the champion, it should not lose to a champion, it should be the superior infantry...
It is the superior infantry. Slavs are an exception because Druzhina is an excellent (and expensive) technology. In a real game you might be able to win vs Slavs with elite samurai
But berserkers are special good for raid and can go also against cavalry….they are very good unit, but maybe he need some small buff like 1 more dps. But he is op anyway he has also more speed then champion to catch archers and siege and can go against cav…..and have regen lol 😂😂🎉🎉
@@Tocaraca mmm don't think so, samurai for example don't lose just vs slav champions but against several champions, some of wich, have their bonus for free in feudal age... Plus, the best champions kind of tie vs paladin and alike, but samurai just dies, i think mainly because of its rather weak attack... And by "real game", i hope you're not talking about 1v1 only, team games are also very real game and in those is very much likely for that tech to be researched
@@pabloduarte1722 I really couldn't care less about team games Since the samurai cost reduction I believe Slav ones are the only ones that can win vs elite samurai with equal res. But I may be wrong. Samurai also move faster and have lower upgrade costs. Obviously they shred most unique units too. It's not supposed to be a "kill every unit in the game" unit
Samurai win against champions in equal numbers. I don't know if they win against Slav champions, but they do better than Japanese champions. If infantry UUs were better units that cost the same, the game would be boring. Maybe the only infantry UU that sometimes does worse than an equal number of champions is Urumi Swordsmen, but they are devastating if they can reach their targets, even beating Slav champions here despite fewer numbers.
Chakras throwers, cataphracts, boyars, kalmyks, war elephants, Teutonic knights, did really well
Small criticism, the grid that sometimes appears is extremely ugly
qizilbash warrior vs other cav ?
Although druzhina champs and slavs overall are in my top 5 fav civs and units (slav champs) it still pains me quite a little that they beat my fav uu like samurai and berserk wich are on my top 4 civs/units so i like them more than slav champs... In my opinion they should buff infantry overall but most of all, infantry uu, if i have a infantry uu on an infantry civ, and sometimes is a replacement for the champion, it should not lose to a champion, it should be the superior infantry...
It is the superior infantry. Slavs are an exception because Druzhina is an excellent (and expensive) technology. In a real game you might be able to win vs Slavs with elite samurai
But berserkers are special good for raid and can go also against cavalry….they are very good unit, but maybe he need some small buff like 1 more dps. But he is op anyway he has also more speed then champion to catch archers and siege and can go against cav…..and have regen lol 😂😂🎉🎉
@@Tocaraca mmm don't think so, samurai for example don't lose just vs slav champions but against several champions, some of wich, have their bonus for free in feudal age...
Plus, the best champions kind of tie vs paladin and alike, but samurai just dies, i think mainly because of its rather weak attack...
And by "real game", i hope you're not talking about 1v1 only, team games are also very real game and in those is very much likely for that tech to be researched
@@pabloduarte1722 I really couldn't care less about team games
Since the samurai cost reduction I believe Slav ones are the only ones that can win vs elite samurai with equal res. But I may be wrong. Samurai also move faster and have lower upgrade costs. Obviously they shred most unique units too. It's not supposed to be a "kill every unit in the game" unit
Samurai win against champions in equal numbers. I don't know if they win against Slav champions, but they do better than Japanese champions. If infantry UUs were better units that cost the same, the game would be boring.
Maybe the only infantry UU that sometimes does worse than an equal number of champions is Urumi Swordsmen, but they are devastating if they can reach their targets, even beating Slav champions here despite fewer numbers.
you give me 2 seconds to read 12 lines of text
😂