@@invertebraterecords Now, you gotta get thems fellas into some good ol' cowboy boots. Yeah, I reckon you should do that for the sequel! But Great Work, pards!!
Hey! I'm sorry to intrude, but I just wanted to point out that the camera is too close to the actors, which breaks the western look. Clint Eastwood movies usually have the camera really, really far away from the actors, which flattens out the perspective and allows the director to play with the composition. For example, it's harder to discern if an object is close or far away if you use a camera far away and zoom in with a 50 or 70-mm lens. That's how The Lord of the Rings was filmed. Frodo would be looking at a literal wall, and Gandalf would be closer to the camera. This would make Frodo look smaller than Gandalf. If the camera is too close to the actor, it distorts the perspective and creates a fish-eye effect, which breaks the believability of the scene since everything looks ginormous and it's easy to tell apart the distance between objects - which makes composition 10 times harder.
No need to be sorry at all. Thank you for taking time to watch, and also provide extremely valuable feed back. We truly appreciate the honesty and constructive criticism. The additional insight, as to what is off, and what we could have done better. You definitely earned a sub from us, Thank ya kindly partner. 🦑
@@godandfamilyalways8149 Missed the fact I was commenting on the scene composition, not the script. Film composition only concerns how you present your ideas; it has nothing to do with the genre per se. Yes, some genres may have camera and pacing tropes, but there's a reason people go to college to learn how to record movies. Anything from environment, color palette, shadows, and cuts is a form of language that helps make the script and the genre comprehensive. If you don't care about filming techniques and composition, tour audience will look the wrong way and may get lost because they have no idea where to look or what the hell is going on. If the cuts are poorly placed, dialogue may feel rushed or nonsensical. TLDR, filming is a complex thing regardless of genre.
“You smell Beautiful” & “go’n be a while” are my favorite lines… pure gold.
A Swiss standoff…A Canadian conflict!
Yep a bad western…..most excellent m’thinks
No false advertising here, than you kindly for viewing partner.
Beautiful work of cinema here thank you for sharing
The titel definitely lived up to its name.
This was the worst "Bad Western" I've ever seen! Laughing all the way through it. Good Job Guys. Loved Mason's hat!!
hahaha! Thank ya kindly partner. Ya got an eye for class and style.
Thrift stores be havin it sometimes!
@@invertebraterecords Now, you gotta get thems fellas into some good ol' cowboy boots. Yeah, I reckon you should do that for the sequel! But Great Work, pards!!
"Scrreeeeechhh" - Soaring Eagle 🦅
Somebody was on fire with that post production
Twas a mighty fine western
Thank ya kindly partner.
Gold!!
Theres gold in dem hills!
Thank ya for watching cowpoke.
I’m so glad the algorithm blessed me with this
Yeehawwww! We are sure grateful ya found us, Thanks for watching partner!
I wasn't mentally prepared for this silliness 😂🤠
We aim to please..... eh .. eh..
Thank ya kindly partner for viewing our little picture show.
Love it! Thank youuu
No sir..... I insist...... Thank You!
probably the best thing I saw on yt today
Yeeehaww, those words are sweeter than a desert flower! Thank ya kindly!
😂❤ you have a beautiful mind
Normalize complimenting your cowboyfriends!
Hey! I'm sorry to intrude, but I just wanted to point out that the camera is too close to the actors, which breaks the western look.
Clint Eastwood movies usually have the camera really, really far away from the actors, which flattens out the perspective and allows the director to play with the composition.
For example, it's harder to discern if an object is close or far away if you use a camera far away and zoom in with a 50 or 70-mm lens. That's how The Lord of the Rings was filmed. Frodo would be looking at a literal wall, and Gandalf would be closer to the camera. This would make Frodo look smaller than Gandalf.
If the camera is too close to the actor, it distorts the perspective and creates a fish-eye effect, which breaks the believability of the scene since everything looks ginormous and it's easy to tell apart the distance between objects - which makes composition 10 times harder.
No need to be sorry at all.
Thank you for taking time to watch, and also provide extremely valuable feed back. We truly appreciate the honesty and constructive criticism. The additional insight, as to what is off, and what we could have done better. You definitely earned a sub from us, Thank ya kindly partner.
🦑
Missed the fact it's supposed to be corny
@@godandfamilyalways8149 Missed the fact I was commenting on the scene composition, not the script.
Film composition only concerns how you present your ideas; it has nothing to do with the genre per se.
Yes, some genres may have camera and pacing tropes, but there's a reason people go to college to learn how to record movies.
Anything from environment, color palette, shadows, and cuts is a form of language that helps make the script and the genre comprehensive.
If you don't care about filming techniques and composition, tour audience will look the wrong way and may get lost because they have no idea where to look or what the hell is going on.
If the cuts are poorly placed, dialogue may feel rushed or nonsensical.
TLDR, filming is a complex thing regardless of genre.
Is this Horizon Part 2?
hahahahaha.... dang RIP.
Thank you for watching, That's mighty kind of ya.
Yeehaw. I insist
No...... I Insist.... after you!
👏
Well, the title is correct.. it’s pretty bad.