How Does Acoustic Levitation Really Work?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025
  • Download Klima to go carbon neutral: klima.onelink....
    I talk about why it isn't intuitive how acoustic levitation works.
    Get Your Experiment Box Here: theactionlab.com/
    Checkout my experiment book: amzn.to/2Wf07x1
    Twitter: / theactionlabman
    Facebook: / theactionlabofficial
    Instagram: / therealactionlab
    Snap: / 426771378288640
    Tik Tok: / theactionlabshorts

ความคิดเห็น • 555

  • @trollakhinmemeborn3278
    @trollakhinmemeborn3278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +375

    That's the first time I finally understood what standing waves are, super good visual aid here, and very intuitive

    • @pubcollize
      @pubcollize 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      same, i could never grasp them

    • @TheBrickagon
      @TheBrickagon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @manicmadpanickedman2249
      @manicmadpanickedman2249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a machine based off this .. its a demo of the og tesla oscillator not the one people think it is its on my chan

    • @xxACIDVIRUSxx
      @xxACIDVIRUSxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I know right! I love this guy, he explains it so well that it makes it easier for dumb people like myself.

    • @manicmadpanickedman2249
      @manicmadpanickedman2249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xxACIDVIRUSxx lol 👍

  • @NicktheBlkBlt
    @NicktheBlkBlt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    Awesome demonstration! Would have loved to see sand, or something granular to see the effects on it. Given the Node->Anti-Node relationship and the size of the material. Seeing the tinier material push closer to the Anti-Nodes than the objects you used would be neat.

    • @paulbloore3984
      @paulbloore3984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      My thoughts exactly. Perhaps some flour or other powder would work well.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      I couldn't get any smaller particles to levitate. They have to be very small and very light (microgram range). I believe the smaller particle levitation is a lot more finicky and you have to get really good resonance. I'm not sure my setup could have achieved it.

    • @NicktheBlkBlt
      @NicktheBlkBlt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@TheActionLab Ah okay, work with what you've got right. Thanks for the response regardless.

    • @martinrizzo
      @martinrizzo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@TheActionLab what about something like smoke?

    • @lordl1991
      @lordl1991 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheActionLab try cutting the Styrofoam with a needle, it should work :)

  • @ProjectPhysX
    @ProjectPhysX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    I've done experiments with arrays of these ultrasonic speakers at university. You can move little beads around in 3D space. If you put your finger in there you can actually feel the pressure zones pushing on the skin.

    • @h.wolrab440
      @h.wolrab440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thats awesome

    • @MrRatchet1996
      @MrRatchet1996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That was the first thing I thought of doing if I had a setup like this.
      Super understandable video.

    • @doiron12
      @doiron12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It seems like this would have some practical applications in navigation as another means of a gyroscope. But then again why reinvent the wheel.

    • @ProjectPhysX
      @ProjectPhysX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@doiron12 not really. One possible application is as a volumetric display, if you move the particle around fast enough and make it reflect light. But there are better volumetric display technologies.

    • @electrokoh5511
      @electrokoh5511 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      can it be scaled up to lift up a car? or can it be improved to act as a shield for cars during crashes?

  • @jasonchen9645
    @jasonchen9645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Imagine doing all these experiments on your channel at the annual school science fair?
    There'd be no competition!

    • @Yusso
      @Yusso 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Unless the competition also watches The Action Lab.

    • @cyankirkpatrick5194
      @cyankirkpatrick5194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But if I did them I still wouldn't win I was truly hated during middle school even though I did everything right and stayed out of everyone's way,and still got bullied, they would say either I was cheating or I stole it from the entitled kids project.

    • @aura4977
      @aura4977 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyankirkpatrick5194 :(

    • @contraband1543
      @contraband1543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@cyankirkpatrick5194 Buddy that victim attitude is going to get you absolutely nowhere.

    • @Gryffindor_Potterhead4Life
      @Gryffindor_Potterhead4Life ปีที่แล้ว

      bro this is legit what im doing for 2023 science fair

  • @elirevzen418
    @elirevzen418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Now I really want to see what this would look like in a schlieren imaging system. With one of those you'd be able to see the standing wave itself.

    • @snortoise
      @snortoise 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's been done! This whole video is basically quoting a paper from David Jackson in the American Journal of Physics (without giving any credit)

  • @Sir_Uncle_Ned
    @Sir_Uncle_Ned 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That slinky demonstration made me actually understand the standing wave! I learnt about it in Physics but never could properly visualise it until now. Thanks!

  • @mcmaschio
    @mcmaschio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Loving this channel i learn so much from watching one video than an entire year in school 😂… also inspirational for ur creators 💯🔥

  • @JeremyMcMahan
    @JeremyMcMahan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The best explanation I've seen of this. Thank you for the great teaching!

  • @newt7743
    @newt7743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel is nothing short of phenomenal. Keep up the great work

  • @JMWexperience
    @JMWexperience 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    What a great explanation and visual demonstration of a basic physics principle! Thanks so much.

  • @Sugondees
    @Sugondees 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This man has the unique ability to somehow insert the vacuum chamber in every video.

  • @lumanaughty1025
    @lumanaughty1025 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Damnnn, the standing wave in the slinky was actually so cool!!

  • @johntheux9238
    @johntheux9238 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What people don't understand is that destructive interferences don't cancel each other. The amplitude is the sound pressure and not energy. Cancelling each other means that the sum of forces is zero which create a node. The energy however is reflected by the node like it was a solid wall.

  • @blacklambo
    @blacklambo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your channel has just become my favorite! .....and you have been on the "tube" forever! Love these experiments!

  • @supertuesday600
    @supertuesday600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Extremely helpful explanation! Truly gifted

  • @amusableackeem
    @amusableackeem 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I’ve been saying this for a long time, I think the solution to levitating cars (not flying cars) is sound!! Not giant fans (too windy), not magnets (need super conductors) but sound. It works at normal temperatures and pressure. Just install transponders under the roads and the car will have the receiver and voilà! Although, the question is can sound hold the weight of cars? But then again, most of the weight in cars is for energy to make the car move and balance on wheels - in this case there’s no need for all that, we’d have to reinvent the construction of cars!
    Exciting stuff.

    • @derricksallazzo1502
      @derricksallazzo1502 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      that would destroy your ears lolll

    • @amusableackeem
      @amusableackeem 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@derricksallazzo1502 I don’t think it has to be lol. Could you very low or very high frequencies (ultrasound) that we can’t hear. Or use sound absorption.

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@amusableackeem The larger the object, the bigger the acoustic wavelength you'd need, hence the larger the "speaker". For a car, you'd need insane woofers whose wavelength would make it resonate with all kinds of objects. Also, these waves would affect the passengers, and it would transmit up as well, into birds and stuff. Not to mention the amount of energy required would be insane. I work with acoustic levitation of cells. You need 1 to 30 W to levitate micrometer sized cells. Imagine a car that weighs about 200 kg with passengers. I'd go with Musk's hyperloop instead :D

  • @jamesmoore9727
    @jamesmoore9727 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are some of the best executed and reported experiments. There are a lot of youtube scientists but few show this level of experimental and analytical skill. Lots of love!

  • @evennorthug2585
    @evennorthug2585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. This made my head spin. Your videos are really good.

  • @shawnphillips4804
    @shawnphillips4804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm so glad you hit this topic!!

  • @nicolasbertin8552
    @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I actually work in acoustic levitation or rather acoustophoresis, and it's even more complex than explained in the video. First of all, you don't need a standing wave to have acoustic levitation. You just need radiation pressure. So you just need high acoustic pressure, to have enough non linear effects that create that pressure. You can do that with standing waves but also with focused transducers. Moreover, the radiation pressure is much more complex than explained. You have particles that will go to the nodes, and particles that go to the anti node, regardless of their size. It depends on the acoustic contrast factor. For example, if we're talking levitating cells in water, you're gonna have blood cells that will go to the nodes, because their speed of sound and density is a bit larger than water, so the contrast factor is positive. If you have fat cells, which are less dense and with a lower speed of sound than water, they're gonna move to the anti-nodes. At its simplest, radiation pressure is a non linear effect that occurs when a powerful acoustic wave passes from a medium to another. The transfer of "momentum" from a medium to the other creates a force on that interface between the two media. Those media can be two liquids, like a cell in water, or an oil/water interface. It can also be liquid and solid, like a steel ball in water, or it can be gas and solid, like your experiment. I suggest you try water droplets in levitation, some fun stuff can happen, as well as powders, like ground coffee for example. You'll see strange patterns like spirals occurring, showing that on the horizontal plane the acoustic pressure depends on the horizontal coordinates as well, coz no standing wave is perfect. Also, there are amazing similarities between acoustic radiation pressure and electromagnetic radiation pressure. But when acoustic radiation pressure occurs due to a contrast of impedance (IE density and speed of sound), EM radiation pressure occurs due to a contrast of optical index. Also, photons have momentum, but technically an acoustic wave doesn't... So in the world of experts in acoustics, it is not totally understood how it works... You can extract radiation pressure from the equations but in my opinion there is no simple satisfying way to explain its source. A laser emits photons, those photons accelerate or decelerate when passing through an interface, so that interface is subject to a change in momentum, and a force is applied on it as a result. But with acoustic waves, where are the particles ? Where is the momentum ? Physicists have different views on this. Some will say it's simple and they're convinced it's this or that, but to be honest, it's just maths. There is no satisfying explanation.

    • @roryduff4529
      @roryduff4529 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Than you, your note has been very helpful. A possible answer to those last questions may be in a small sub quantum level where there are only waves of vibrations that intersect to create spikes of energy and small balls of energy that appear/disappear/appear on the larger quantum level. This would explain both the momentum and the two slit experiment observations.

  • @Speeder84XL
    @Speeder84XL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Really cool!
    I did know about standing waves since I have played with sound s a lot and have also been building a listening room (in which case, the task is to get rid of standing waves - which can be tricky sometimes, haha). At bass frequencies, the wavelengths get about the same as the room dimensions of normal rooms. Quite cool when playing with bass tone and a standing wave accors - certain frequencies can sound really strong at one point and just one or a few meters beside it, there is pretty much complete silence (since we only hear pressure, not air movement) - but these effects usually don't affect music or sound effects in a pleasant way.
    I still had no idea that the pressure or air movements can counteract gravity like that - really cool.

  • @danielbarreiro8228
    @danielbarreiro8228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Since particles go to the nodes or anti-nodes depending on their size, can this setup allow for separating particles by size? Thanks

    • @frojojo5717
      @frojojo5717 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was wondering what would happen if you just tossed some salt or baking powder or such in there.

    • @louieberg2942
      @louieberg2942 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I also wondered about the potential of a "sound sieve"

    • @tat890
      @tat890 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually he got it wrong about the size of the particle. If particle go to anti node or node is determined by acoustic contrast factor, I.e. the material property of the target object.

  • @joshuamills9277
    @joshuamills9277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I took that waves and optics a few years ago.
    Only now, after this video, do I understand what the heck I was calculating in those acoustic problems

  • @tomasgarza1249
    @tomasgarza1249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way you push a particle to the next node reminds me of energy levels and quantum jumps in atoms.
    And watching the slinky rings at the antinodes gives the ilusion they are teleporting but they are not.
    Amazing video. The demonstration with the slinky is insane.

  • @doiron12
    @doiron12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Can this be accomplished with light waves? I would love to see that!

    • @thefuzzman
      @thefuzzman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wouldn't think so, light waves wouldn't develop pressure like sound waves

    • @theolderwaitor3662
      @theolderwaitor3662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes they are called optical tweezers, which utilizes focused laser beam

    • @doiron12
      @doiron12 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theolderwaitor3662 Very interesting!

    • @doiron12
      @doiron12 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thefuzzman Light waves have momentum which is similar. He's done a few videos about that. They can move objects in a vacuum

  • @chandrasekarank8583
    @chandrasekarank8583 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would really love a dedicated video explaining how you built those speakers. Like calculations to arrive on the amplitude, frequency, based on what thing you want to levitate

  • @luca_argo
    @luca_argo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    school sucks beside explanations like this, thank you man

  • @jasonchen9645
    @jasonchen9645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Love this channel. Are you a chemist or physicist by training?

    • @Night_Wood
      @Night_Wood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yeah he has a phd in chemical engineering. Dudes rly smart and has the knowledge to go with it

  • @01DOGG01
    @01DOGG01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A good analogue to that is depth charges. If you look at the explosions, they seem to vibrate. And that's due to thermodynamics.

  • @loudeclercq
    @loudeclercq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Could you put large particles and small ones at the same time ?

  • @justsaiyan8678
    @justsaiyan8678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Like he’s literally the professor we all need!

  • @Dobj319
    @Dobj319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What would you see if you puffed smoke into the “antigravity “ area?

    • @doiron12
      @doiron12 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a great idea! I wonder if it would look like a diffraction pattern?

  • @stevensbox9625
    @stevensbox9625 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. I finally understand how this works. You're right, other sites have a poor explanation.

  • @liamstaver
    @liamstaver 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    New upload yay!

  • @OmegaZZ111
    @OmegaZZ111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The visualizations are great in this video, very well explained, thank you!
    I have one trivial question:
    If air is the medium of this soundwaves in your experiment, what medium do electromagnetic waves use?
    We all know this magnetic floater toys where you can levitate an object with electromagnets.
    If the principle is the same (standing waves) what is the medium for electromagnetic waves?

    • @godwinemerald2289
      @godwinemerald2289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity?

    • @OmegaZZ111
      @OmegaZZ111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@godwinemerald2289 As far as my understanding goes gravity is not a thing, therefore it can be no medium like air or water, which are things.
      Gravity is described as a force and a force is what something does and not what something is.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Electromagnet waves are a disturbance in the field lines of the electric fields all around us. So the electric field is kind of like the medium that is disturbed. Or another way of thinking about it it in terms of particle theory is that electromagnetic waves are actually photons that are shot out like bullets. A bullet doesn't need a medium to fly through, neither do photons.

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      IMO the issue in the video is that it seems like you need standing waves to have radiation pressure. You don't. You just need any wave, electromagnetic or acoustic. You also confuse a magnetic force with the electromagnetic radiation pressure, those are not the same forces at all. The first one results from the magnetic properties of materials, the other from the optical contrast between two media or objects. Radiation pressure can move any object, regardless of their magnetic properties.

    • @nityanandadas5575
      @nityanandadas5575 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheActionLab Can you please inform me how can I get the system kit from India and how much is the cost?
      Thanks

  • @dendemano
    @dendemano 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To any youngster who is watching this clip I implore you to take every advantage of whatever education you are currently receiving. I had to educate myself (as best I could) in adulthood. I wish I could give suitable emphasis on how a good education will enrich your life.
    Military service provided me with options, and joining SF’s provided me with experiences that most people never have, regardless of their wealth or status, although I confess to a healthy kind of envy towards anyone who has received a classical education.

    • @Name-yu6ux
      @Name-yu6ux หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok sir❤🎉 im in class 11😊

  • @Radio_FM_3123
    @Radio_FM_3123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What if, you play 2 notes with different frequency, say a C & a G ( a perfect 5th interval) , will the nodes & anti-nodes form at equal distance? What if other combinations, a C & a F# ?

    • @christaylor8956
      @christaylor8956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you use waves at two different frequencies from either side of the spring, you'll end up forming a beat frequency. When adding both waves together at a point, the amplitude, or size, of the resulting wave will have a pattern of decreasing and then increasing over the course of the beat frequency, which can be worked out by looking at the difference in frequency between the two waves used.
      As the points of maximum and minimum amplitude of the wave won't necessarily be in the same place, I don't think you'll be able to produce a standing wave pattern that is stable enough to make objects levitate as in this video.

  • @yura2424
    @yura2424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As always it was very interesting to see!

  • @ApatheticHamster
    @ApatheticHamster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you help out Vladflix with some chemistry/physics? He posted a video about an effect where steam from a ball/dome of ice drops to the centre of a flaming cocktail and pools rather than just dropping indiscriminately.

  • @HugoHugunin
    @HugoHugunin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It would be interesting to see how smoke would look in your apparatus.
    Hello from the Beaver State.

  • @GamingFloppaYT
    @GamingFloppaYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is so cool. Where did you get those things?

  • @christianheichel
    @christianheichel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the right camera you can see the sound vibrations in the air and using the right code you can take those packets of low and high pressure and change them to sound

  • @madislegames1743
    @madislegames1743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder if there is a particle size effected by both forces equally and settles between the node and antinode

  • @mohamadalajouz7344
    @mohamadalajouz7344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never watch videos that are longer than 3mins but this dude had a very interesting way to demonstrate things

  • @Entropic_Nightmares
    @Entropic_Nightmares 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonder if it's possible to suspend water droplets as well or if it would be too heavy but would be interesting to see if the droplets vibrate on the surface since their not rigid.

  • @berner
    @berner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is there any chance we could see this demonstrated in a liquid medium?

    • @mariosebastiani3214
      @mariosebastiani3214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't think so, as liquids are almost uncompressible, as opposed to the air

    • @aetius31
      @aetius31 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes it does work in a liquid but it is a bit tricker, the wavelenght of the sound in liquids (water for instance) is much smaller so only very small particles can fit the nodes and also viscosity must be taken into account.

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mariosebastiani3214 not true, look up acoustophoresis. I work in that field. You can levitate stuff quite easily. Yes it's less compressible, but it is compressible. Otherwise you wouldn't hear under water, have sonar, or whales communicating. But there is also much less dissipation than in air. Plus with focused transducers, you don't need standing waves.

    • @mariosebastiani3214
      @mariosebastiani3214 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nicolasbertin8552 That's interesting, especially your last sentence. Can you please point me at a specific online document on the topic? I'm used to work with air propagation only, and I'd like to broaden my knowledge. Thanks!

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mariosebastiani3214 just look up any acoustophoresis article, they're all in liquids. For a full understanding of the subject, Lab on a Chip, the journal, published a series of articles called "acoustofluidics". You'll see in there how to produce levitation (mostly in liquids) with surface transducers, standing waves, or focused transducers. You just need sound to have levitation, that's why the video is misleading, it sounds like you absolutely need standing waves but you don't.

  • @kevg7040
    @kevg7040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy always makes sense... Such a good teacher

  • @ugignadl
    @ugignadl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was really hanging out for that "...continue the experiment" promise!

  • @okolol
    @okolol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Speaking about sound, if sound can't travel without air, can you record audio from inside (from a speaker inside and outside the chamber) the vacuum chamber?

    • @TheDeathless
      @TheDeathless 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would be really loud for a bit while the air is sucked out and then it would get quieter and quieter untill there was no more sound. He could then do things like smack on the side of it and you would only hear it if it hits the chamber hard enough to vibrate the recording device itself.

  • @1.4142
    @1.4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's crazy how deep you can dive into seemingly simple subjects.

  • @Wico90YT
    @Wico90YT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a commercial for a show about this earlier. Great timing

  • @JebFromWarmDays
    @JebFromWarmDays 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish they showed us this slinky experiment in physics to explain longitudinal waves. The way that we did it is place a hook on a speaker facing upwards with a string connected going perpendicular to the sound wave out to a rod. Then we calculated the frequency we needed to play the speaker at to get the string to be in a standing transversal wave. It looked really cool, but didn’t really help us understand how the pressure waves of sound work.

  • @adnankaisarkhan
    @adnankaisarkhan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So it means air molecules/particles are settling at the antinode?

  • @nunyobidness2358
    @nunyobidness2358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What happens if you rotate the speakers 180° and really crank the juice?

  • @ErikHerman
    @ErikHerman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for helping popularize these awesome little units! You're right. Way easier to deal with than the bulky flat-surface metal ones. I'm going to put them on the Physics Bus so kids can share in the fun!

  • @priyabratasadhukhan6435
    @priyabratasadhukhan6435 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have seen this effect in ultrasonic bath sonicators. When we turn the bath sonicator on, the trapped air in the water makes small air bubbles that move to the nodes and thus cannot get out of the water. I can see the air bubbles literally stuck in the middle of the water.

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Air bubbles in water actually have a negative acoustic contrast factor. So they move to the pressure anti nodes. If it were water droplets in air, they'd move to the nodes.

  • @trinsit
    @trinsit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best episode! This is it! That's how it works! Now imagine you understood how to control the sound waves to the point of being able to move all particles caught in the wave. This idea is the clue.

  • @cliffordwilliams9597
    @cliffordwilliams9597 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great demonstration and explanation!
    The only thing missing is an affiliate link for those ultrasonic transducers !!!

  • @adityapandey6422
    @adityapandey6422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this channel ... Love to learn new things in phy and chem love from India ❤️❤️👍🏻

  • @chandrasekarank8583
    @chandrasekarank8583 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well i have done engineering in electronics and communication, but i didn't know this till now , well humbled by science and education and your knowledge. Lot of things to learn and especially relearn 🤣😌.

  • @haxxx0rz
    @haxxx0rz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very interesting! I wonder how it looks using smoke particles.

  • @rzto
    @rzto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make the soundwaves visible with like a powder or something else?

  • @Nini_tunes
    @Nini_tunes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was sooooo beautiful ❤️ thanks

  • @codemeister3
    @codemeister3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome. I love your videos. This is the best one yet

  • @cosmos8366
    @cosmos8366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought the levitation kit that you put together to use with the arduino but never got it working. I would love to give this a try and your setup looks so simple, Could you please do a video on your set up like the ultrasonic transducers you used and what you used to send the signal to the transducers. That would be gratefully appreciated, David.

  • @SupraRy
    @SupraRy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wish I had you as a teacher in high school. You're extremely intelligent my feiend and you have a great qay of explaining things for the lay person.

  • @westonding8953
    @westonding8953 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is the largest object you can levitate with this? Cool stuff!

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bigger transducers=bigger objects to levitate!

  • @PlutoniumBoss
    @PlutoniumBoss 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    On a related note, there's a character in Xmen called Banshee with a super-powered scream. He uses this to fly by basically screaming at the ground and riding the reflected sound wave like a human surfboard. I've long wondered what the actual energy needed to do this would be, and what if any collateral damage there would be to anything in his path.

  • @ScBroodSc2
    @ScBroodSc2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is this possible large scale, like imagine a big speaker in your home that above it, it traps all dust particles? :P

    • @timehunter9467
      @timehunter9467 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds cool and gross at the same time, a meter for how dirty your room is!

  • @unlvphysics
    @unlvphysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really an outstanding and informative demonstration.

  • @amibeingdetained3417
    @amibeingdetained3417 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best videos to be bestowed to mankind, thank you.

  • @storminmormin14
    @storminmormin14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would be really cool if you could charge them so that they repel each other and model electron orbitals

  • @MrCuddlyable3
    @MrCuddlyable3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:50 "...transducer is a little bit PARABOLIC so it can easily set up a standing wave even if you are not an exact multiple away from it." Please explain "parabolic"! If the transducer is in a self-resonant circuit, I would suspect that its frequency is detuned by the reflector.

  • @gangsterkami1
    @gangsterkami1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video my friend, great job and thank you.

  • @simonjelley
    @simonjelley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are you driving the transducer with? I want to make one and have a play!

  • @allenryder
    @allenryder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this channel

  • @Nightcrawler333
    @Nightcrawler333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for this video and the clear explanation.. I've never seen this in my life until now..

  • @its-a-bountiful-life
    @its-a-bountiful-life 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hereby crown you the new "Science Guy". Out with Bill Nye, In with The Action Lab Guy! Great stuff!

  • @motioninmind6015
    @motioninmind6015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was awesome, thanks my man!

  • @adilfair9699
    @adilfair9699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. Relativity of the electron and its motion. His waveform.
    2. Refraction of different materials. Q: Why do metals not refract light?
    3. Radius of an atom. The properties of substances depend on electrons.
    4. The similarity between the gravitational field and the magnetic one. From what elementary law they are drawn. What unites them.
    5. What is the frequency in a photon.
    6. How light refraction works.
    7. I believe electromagnetic radiation is due to the relativity of the electron, and the number of molecules.
    8. How electr moves

  • @ericafreeman3317
    @ericafreeman3317 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Use argon gas in a balloon to focus the sound into one point like focusing light with glass
    gas acts as focusing agent for sound 👌

  • @markmark8545
    @markmark8545 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am soooo glad i subscribed and hit the bell...you are brilliant...great science for adults and children alike :-)

  • @gidi1899
    @gidi1899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you use this effect to filter air?

  • @themadhatter227
    @themadhatter227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm such a nerd for science. It's like porn addiction, but productive and fascinating at the same time.
    I have to say, after watching the first video I seen of yours; then subscribing; and then getting notifications to a few of your recent videos. I'm very glad that I subscribed. . .
    My favorite part of any science, is the lab portions where I can see it, and participate in it.
    Your demonstrations are truly fun to watch every single time!
    The last one I watched was with the laser and the small ball bearing. The light that actually passes through a spherical object at it's precise center. That was fascinating, and I can't wait to one day, replicate it for someone.

  • @greatPretender79
    @greatPretender79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I didn't know acoustic levitation was a thing, but now I know WHY it is a thing.

  • @OMNI-Infinity
    @OMNI-Infinity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I need this item in my life now!

  • @kronologie
    @kronologie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:52 “before we continue with this experiment, i’d like to thank the sponsor for this video”
    **video ends one minute later**

  • @khansahab2328
    @khansahab2328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plz explain the working of MRI with law/principal or rule of physics

  • @abavariannormiepleb9470
    @abavariannormiepleb9470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could this effect be visualized with smoke and a high-framerate camera?

    • @nicolasbertin8552
      @nicolasbertin8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      no coz smoke particles are very small. You'd need a higher frequency, more power, it'd take some doing. The larger the object, the higher the force. It's proportional to the cubeof the radius of the object. Meaning that a 1 mm particle will have 1000 times the force applied to it than a 100 µm particle. Smoke would be micron sized, so he'd need a billion times the power at least, although he'd gain power by increasing the frequency as well... But it'd take a lot. At least there'd be no gravity involved (or very little). But still, to attract those smoke particles from far out the nodes towards the nodes... Heh, would be tough.

  • @simonthorneycroft1339
    @simonthorneycroft1339 ปีที่แล้ว

    An interesting demonstration.
    I have had people who believe that a lost ancient civilisation tell me that this method might have been used to move dense objects like stone blocks, but this seems unlikely to me.
    When you add in a Styrofoam chunk into the air gap, is there a relationship between the air pressure generated and the density / mass which can be lifted?
    Is there a consequent down force on the acoustic generator when the styrofoam pieces are introduced?
    With thanks, Simon

  • @shaamao
    @shaamao 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love how you correctly described longitudunal wave but I think you labeled node and antinode wrong.
    In standing wave node means no vibration and antinode means vibrating the most. It has nothing to do with pressure.

  • @SPMLongCovid
    @SPMLongCovid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please list sources for the US transducers, the frequency used, and the tone generator settings in case anyone wants to recreate this cool experiment.

  • @WaterproofSoap
    @WaterproofSoap 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really love this demonstration and explanations....it would have made US Navy radar school quite a bit easier years ago

  • @MiguelY22
    @MiguelY22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you shown the sand in a flat plate mounted to a speaker? Playing different frequencies on the speaker makes patterns on the sand

  • @erikcourtney1834
    @erikcourtney1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look up “hair trick” car audio.
    A few years ago when I was big into car audio, I could float towels, shirts, empty coke cans, and long hair Ofcourse in the window. It takes a lot of subwoofers and a lot of power. The larger the cabin space the more you need. I had 10-15’s on 20k watts.

  • @sandboxlarry9490
    @sandboxlarry9490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You find the most incredible uses for your vacuum chamber 🤯

  • @jamessotherden5909
    @jamessotherden5909 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a nice concise explanation.

  • @assemblyrequired7342
    @assemblyrequired7342 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, so now my question is: could this be scaled up the size necessary to function as, say a crane to levitate heavy objects? Could those two ultrasonic transducers be used as manipulators to maneuver parts into place?
    Also, I have to wonder if it would even be worth substituting cranes for acoustic levitation, since actively generating acoustic waves would, I imagine, be more energy intensive.
    Allegedly, sound was used to create the ancient pyramids, so I can't help but wonder if acoustic levitation could ever actually be adapted into a practical technology.

  • @mtdiy
    @mtdiy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, wow, I just built one of my own and I can do 5 :-). It is always amazing to watch this.

  • @dindon6947
    @dindon6947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be cool to put a recorder inside the vacuum chamber while a sound is being reproduced to hear how the sound fades away with no air.