These Planes Are Propelled With Ionic Thrust

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2021
  • In this video I show you how to create ionic thrust using electrodynamics to create air flow with no moving parts. I show you how ionic wind is produced in order to make ionocrafts and lifters fly. I also talk about ion thrusters used in space. I test if they work in a vacuum.
    Get Your Experiment Box Here: theactionlab.com/
    Checkout my experiment book: amzn.to/2Wf07x1
    Follow me on Twitter: / theactionlabman
    Facebook: / theactionlabofficial
    Instagram: / therealactionlab
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.2K

  • @TheActionLab
    @TheActionLab  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1770

    Hey everyone! Thanks for 3M subs!

  • @bfitz5610
    @bfitz5610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2646

    Literally no TH-cam video has ever started with a more compelling intro than "today I'm going to show you how to make an ion propulsion jet".

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2627

    Love that you have the SparKit Wimshurst! That's a cool little powersource, designed by a 14 year old in New Zealand.

    • @minepaperstudio5683
      @minepaperstudio5683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Yey

    • @parzival__1
      @parzival__1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Hey plasma channel , I'm Ur fan

    • @-ChrisD
      @-ChrisD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Plasma channel, I love seeing your comment! I just recently received a coffee mug of yours in the mail that I ordered. The black mug with the key and energy in purple. It's fantastic! Such a cool image 👍🏻

    • @lwkey-py
      @lwkey-py 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      OMG. I can't believe you commented on this channel. Both of my favorite channels talking.

    • @checkingoutgypsymike2075
      @checkingoutgypsymike2075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Hopefully someday a person with the vast knowledge you two have will build a controller and run a hyperdrive system like Gerard Morin was trying to build, if the electric companies can use their skin effect energy to pull the ionic energy out of the atmosphere to feed our transformers, building a frequency controller to run the edrum motors should be no problem.

  • @wesleybaker8188
    @wesleybaker8188 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You just explained ion propulsion in 2 minutes. I've spent hours watching probably boring space engineering videos and never understood. Legend

  • @Admiral45-10
    @Admiral45-10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I'm really into aviation. Planes using cheap and effective methods of propulsion sounds just awesome.

    • @RootzRockBand
      @RootzRockBand ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ooneybird27I suggest you watch “keys to the truth” “how top gun fighter jets fly”

  • @jaisuriyar5259
    @jaisuriyar5259 3 ปีที่แล้ว +709

    "I'm out of content"
    -Words never came out of this guy's mouth.

    • @Elsonlianneihguk
      @Elsonlianneihguk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +He's so wholesome

    • @toragold
      @toragold 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Don't give him pressure. He is working hard. Even he can burnout 😅. But yes, the guy is never out of content 😂. Im always asking what he brings next. And he is always impressing me with his content. I Love this channel. some times im even laugh like the video where he jumps from a car. btw cool experiment 👍☝

    • @insectbite1714
      @insectbite1714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@toragold he time traveled in one of his episodes. HE KNOWS IF AGENDA 2021 WILL WORK OR NOT. HE IS TRYING TO MAKE EAERH DEPOPULATED WITH BILL GATES😒💧🫔🥔🥚🦪🤪👦🤪👦🏆🧪😬👦🍒🤯🎀🥔👵😂🍾🥔💚🌄🏆😡😄🔥⛎🤪😎🎀🇨🇳🇨🇳⛎🥚🇨🇳😬🇨🇳🍒🇨🇳🇨🇳🍾🫔🤪🦪🫔👦🍾🦪🥕🍅🫒🥕🥕🍅🔥🎃🥚🔥🥚👱😒💚😒🏆🤷🤷🇨🇳🎀🥚😒🇨🇳🥕🎀💚😡🥚🤯👱👵🥔🎃🥯⛎😂😣🥯🎃😂🥯🎃🥯😫🤷😫🥲😣😫🥲👱😫🥲🏆🧪👱🥲👱🧪🥲👱🧪🥲👱😒👎👵🌄👵👎😬👎🫒😎🥚👱😎🌄🥚😎😬💚😎🏆🎀🥕🇨🇳🎀🇨🇳🥕🍒👎😂🎃🥔🤯😎💧⛎🥲💧😎🤷🏆💚🥚🤯😒😂🍒🥯👎😬⛎💧😎😎💧⛎🔥⛎😎⛎💧🫒🎀🥕😒

    • @OeshenNix
      @OeshenNix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@insectbite1714 are you drunk or having a stroke maybe both and stupid

    • @loganthesaint
      @loganthesaint 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Science will never run out of content

  • @justsaiyan8678
    @justsaiyan8678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +979

    If you were my physics professor, I wouldn’t ever leave class.

    • @shifa-8423
      @shifa-8423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yup

    • @leiladekwatro3147
      @leiladekwatro3147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Go home, the graduation ceremony ended 4 years ago

    • @douglas60040
      @douglas60040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I had a pretty cool physics instructor...it’s fun to continue learning by a hands-on TH-camr.

    • @madkirk7431
      @madkirk7431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ikr

    • @sm10_2
      @sm10_2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My graduation ceremony will START 4 years seriously

  • @LightningEagle14
    @LightningEagle14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    That explanation was incredible. Concise, but very easy to follow. I understood it right away.
    What a cool concept! It’s crazy to think that you can propel something with just electricity and no moving parts.

    • @melissaflood505
      @melissaflood505 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah here on Earth

    • @poggergen1937
      @poggergen1937 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@melissaflood505 *cough* oxidizer *cough*

    • @taz6122
      @taz6122 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poggergen1937 lmao!

    • @luminasentinel8318
      @luminasentinel8318 ปีที่แล้ว

      What more crazy is. We got now the technology to have unlimited energy the man replicate the power of the sun light and converted into electricity.

    • @freezingcathedral
      @freezingcathedral ปีที่แล้ว

      why is that crazy?

  • @jasonellis8180
    @jasonellis8180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the kind of technology I’ve been talking about for years now, this will change the evaluation of aircraft flight. This is the future.

  • @user-yo7xy1st7z
    @user-yo7xy1st7z 3 ปีที่แล้ว +317

    For some more infos on the ion thrusters on spacecrafts:
    In comparison to chemical rockets the exhaust speed can be way higher (exhaust speed correlates to efficiency).
    They are already used on satellites.
    They have a low TWR meaning they produce very little thrust in comparison to their mass.
    The gas used is mainly xenon and doesn’t contain any energy that is used for propulsion, it’s just used as mass that can be thrown away(to create thrust ).
    The energy comes from solar arrays / batteries.

    • @boots7859
      @boots7859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yes, that sounds correct. Question is what is the MPG equivelent of Xenon they are carrying. Several orders of magnitude higher than molecular combusion IIRC.

    • @jemlittle1787
      @jemlittle1787 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mass that can be thrown away ?
      Thats a tiny bit flippant sorry.
      That tiny bit must be taken with and also gives a finite travel distance.
      Both the main reasons ion is touted as better this test just shows it fails on.

    • @HarryPotter99
      @HarryPotter99 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah shit

    • @ryandean3162
      @ryandean3162 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@jemlittle1787 Mass that can be thrown away is the way all space travel works. You move by throwing away the uninteresting bit (the fuel) to move the interesting bit (the spacecraft) somewhere else. Conservation of momentum requires this. Thankfully, there is no Conservation of Interesting Bits. In fact, the center of mass for the spacecraft and fuel remains stationary, at least barring outside interference, and the fuel just ends up over here somewhere, and the spacecraft ends up over there somewhere. The question is exactly how efficiently can you convert into movement the throwing away of the uninteresting bit. Conventional rockets are not very efficient, ion thrusters are very efficient.

    • @tinypine7831
      @tinypine7831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Xenon provides the mass associated with its density( heavier than other nobel gases / elements) also bioavailability of Xenon requires no catalyst; be used as a zero point energy source

  • @EiriksvinZ
    @EiriksvinZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +470

    That's a whole new engine race. Ion engines, size, thrust, speed records, the whole game. Usage ideas like secondary engines, or stage related concepts. This is exactly what we need to focus on for any and all aspects of travel. Make it happen.

    • @datatwo7405
      @datatwo7405 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Providing of course the petro industry and the politicians connected to them don't fight to slow it down like the joke of a president Bush, Jr. and Cheney. They did everything they could to slow non petrol fuel source development while pushing petro dependency. That is only one of the reasons that the U.S. is still stuck in stasis with no real impacting developments since the turn of the century.

    • @EiriksvinZ
      @EiriksvinZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@datatwo7405 Well, I'm a supporter of seeing the Petro industry taking the lead on this sort of venture. While they figure out the science of it, we'll buy big trucks and gas guzzlers as incentive to lead to something better. My position is to support the expansion and growth of the current industry throughout the process which frees us from that burden. They've got tons of funds, and some of the smartest guys on the planet, so there's no reason they couldn't flood our markets with infrastructure funds and investment opportunities. If we keep them on our side, they'll be sure to keep us with new engines. There will always be an oil industry, but who knows, they might find that diversification of resources earns them even bigger rewards.

    • @potatopower707
      @potatopower707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s a while away, there are many loose ends there.

    • @ringofasho7721
      @ringofasho7721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      It's INCREDIBLY inefficient. First of all you need high voltage, which means heavy batteries and tons of power. And the heavier battery, the harder it is to move the object. Think about how much power you would need to push a car uphill with wind, then think about how heavy your power source would have to be to give that much thrust. Now put that battery pack onto the car and it's too heavy to push again.

    • @potatopower707
      @potatopower707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ringofasho7721 good explanation

  • @Ogsonofgroo
    @Ogsonofgroo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just found this and am amazed, thanks so much for teaching/sharing!

  • @Darthbelal
    @Darthbelal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've seen things like this before, THANK YOU for a down to Earth explanation of what ionic thrust can and can not do.......

  • @theoriginalkeysto
    @theoriginalkeysto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    I love the fact you 3D printed some no mans sky spaceships to use as planes, great little Easter egg there lol. (They also use ionic propulsion in the game, for those that dont already know)

    • @Carlo99yehey
      @Carlo99yehey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Maxime Schweitzer same ngl

    • @EchoNovemberDelter
      @EchoNovemberDelter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Does it say in the description, or is tritium/di-hydrogen a fuel source for ion engines?

    • @theoriginalkeysto
      @theoriginalkeysto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@EchoNovemberDelter tritium and dihydrogen are highly ionized substances, that's all I know. Lol

    • @ThirstysURL
      @ThirstysURL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We use fuel that we build and discovery most of the museum of alien life 4k video ourselves

    • @Corpah
      @Corpah 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the alpha vector

  • @jamofthejar
    @jamofthejar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +968

    "Hi everyone, today I'm going to be showing you how to make an ion propulsion jet."
    He said as if we had the same level of equipments to follow along.

    • @mrsprite399
      @mrsprite399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      In our imagination, everything is possible and every equipments can be found even the outer space ones.

    • @Quagula
      @Quagula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      You have a fork and an outlet dont you?

    • @jamofthejar
      @jamofthejar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You know what to do

    • @absalomdraconis
      @absalomdraconis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Quagula : You also want to build a step-up coil for that sort of thing. Fortunately, plenty of places sell AC-voltage wire.

    • @pineseeker6162
      @pineseeker6162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Quagula hehe bad memories trying that one

  • @agustinbs
    @agustinbs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    amazing, thank you so much for explaining this so clearly and practically

  • @shaihulud4515
    @shaihulud4515 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    What a great introduction! Went straight to the basement to get my diy-stuff ready. Can you please show us how to make or own fusion reactor next time? This would be dope!

    • @nizu9544
      @nizu9544 ปีที่แล้ว

      all you need is uranium, boron or cadmium, steam turbine, and generator. you have now achived nulear power plant be sure to slow down uranium with boron or cadmium or you will blow off the Earth be sure to be careful

  • @2toeninja
    @2toeninja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    This would make a great plasma ball type toy. Would be sick if you could have an x-wing chasing a Tie fighter.

    • @JJ_Binks
      @JJ_Binks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Especially because a the 'TIE' in TIE fighter stands for 'Twin Ion Engines'!

    • @oliverslicey
      @oliverslicey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@JJ_Binks that’s dope

    • @wawar163
      @wawar163 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JJ_Binks sickkk

    • @Toodoi
      @Toodoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JJ_Binks Actually George Lucas just called them TIE fighters because they looked like bow-ties.

    • @olliefoxx7165
      @olliefoxx7165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Toodoi That's not as cool as 'Twin Ion Engines". I'm going with the cooler definition even if it might be incorrect.

  • @elektroqtus
    @elektroqtus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thanks for the insight on this topic. I have a -15Kv power box as a negative ion generator. Did ion wind experiments as well with it. Was supposed to be anti gravity plates, the blueprint. My voltage was too low, plates too small and no glass insulation between them. Cardboard doesn't do so great

    • @michaelknight5589
      @michaelknight5589 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you know how hot the flame gets? Thanks :)

  • @boldkojak2734
    @boldkojak2734 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo… very well explained and you really make a great teacher .. i enjoyed your video… interesting 👍

  • @tylerpitts6178
    @tylerpitts6178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +748

    Him: the reason it's spinning in a circle....
    Me, an intellectual: is because it's hard to spin in a square

    • @II_Bruno_II
      @II_Bruno_II 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Very funny

    • @williamchamberlain2263
      @williamchamberlain2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Sounds crazy, but it can be done (ish): th-cam.com/video/hC0QjGbMUHI/w-d-xo.html

    • @chillinggrin84
      @chillinggrin84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Technically the truth

    • @davisdf3064
      @davisdf3064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@williamchamberlain2263
      They did it
      they actually spun on a square

    • @williamchamberlain2263
      @williamchamberlain2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@davisdf3064 crazy isn't it?

  • @AnonymousMC
    @AnonymousMC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    Congrats on 3 million dude! Your content is very informative and I like the short videos! Keep it up.

    • @milord2921
      @milord2921 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ur subbed to the ppl i watch

    • @AnonymousMC
      @AnonymousMC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@milord2921 Yeah lol

    • @myrmatta1
      @myrmatta1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      IS THIS THE REAL MINECRAFT!?!?
      I love your game!

    • @andrewhamop6665
      @andrewhamop6665 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Father?

    • @AnonymousMC
      @AnonymousMC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@myrmatta1 Lol, no, not the real Minecraft. So sorry lol. Their channel is th-cam.com/users/Minecraft and mine is th-cam.com/users/AnonymousMC.

  • @onesadtech
    @onesadtech 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is incredible technology! Thanks for sharing, your break downs are always very easy to understand, while still giving great detail. 😁

    • @onesadtech
      @onesadtech 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @simpsons Bart what are you talking about my dude?? There's no gas in the vacuum of space, but there's gas within atmospheres all over the place. 🤷‍♀

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That purple aurora off the back of those thing is incredible! Well done! Very impressive.

  • @Kodum_BheegaraN
    @Kodum_BheegaraN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Boring physics & chemistry at schools but now I'm curious to know physics and chemistry here😂. Our school syllabus are outdated 😂😂😂

    • @thalavalikaran262
      @thalavalikaran262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Exactly 100% correct👍😁

    • @qureius494
      @qureius494 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But they are the base

    • @gavincarr2990
      @gavincarr2990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@qureius494 i agree. Even though they are tough classes, having a foundation in them makes these videos much easier to grasp, as well as allowing the viewer to make their own guesses/ hypotheses about the experiments

    • @Khonic23
      @Khonic23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Syllabi*

  • @OldSilkRoad
    @OldSilkRoad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Those two little aircraft chasing each other is the most badass thing I’ve seen today.

    • @Carlo99yehey
      @Carlo99yehey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      69th like nice

    • @scp-yr4kv
      @scp-yr4kv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Carlo99yehey 96th like ecion

    • @edisonhugo8554
      @edisonhugo8554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      100th like to you oldsilkroad :)

    • @OldSilkRoad
      @OldSilkRoad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@edisonhugo8554 Thank you!

    • @OldSilkRoad
      @OldSilkRoad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Carlo99yehey My favorite number 😉

  • @frankmccann29
    @frankmccann29 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for doing the experiment.

  • @user-pi4qd8ik5i
    @user-pi4qd8ik5i ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man! We need professor like him ….he is best in teaching

  • @patrickrose1221
    @patrickrose1221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    You really are the tops . Blew me away with this one. I'm 58 years old and you make me feel like an amazed kid again . Thank you so much : )

    • @Carlo99yehey
      @Carlo99yehey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      glad theres something that can make people like you smile, god bless

    • @patrickrose1221
      @patrickrose1221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Carlo99yehey love and peace to you and yours x

    • @patrickrose1221
      @patrickrose1221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Carlo99yehey my boy calls me Boomer pmsl : )

  • @johnb4882
    @johnb4882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I need to add this to my x wing and tie fighter figures.

    • @Carlo99yehey
      @Carlo99yehey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good luck my friend

    • @homevander
      @homevander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Carlo99yehey twin ION ENGINE

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I assumed the thumbnail was an exaggerated illustration. But Prof. Orgill NEVER disappoints.
    And 3...2...1...
    The glowy, purple ion thrust was simply wonderful! Another great episode from Action Lab :(

    • @noahway13
      @noahway13 ปีที่แล้ว

      3 2 1

    • @eta10tp1
      @eta10tp1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      :(

  • @malcolmlittle7795
    @malcolmlittle7795 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation. Liked the clear visual experiments. I actually understood it all. Good job.

  • @aaabbb-tr2yd
    @aaabbb-tr2yd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +308

    Could you please share any circuit diagrams, voltages etc. that can help us replicate the experiment? Thanks for you awesome videos all the time. A physics teacher.

    • @raymondedge8889
      @raymondedge8889 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just research online. This tech has been around for 40+ years. Found not even close to being effective.

    • @CTimmerman
      @CTimmerman ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Those permanent Tesla coil sparks might be dangerous, but video 5R9VlK2iSZ4 shows you can achieve the same static propeller effect with a Van de Graaff generator.

    • @1littlelee
      @1littlelee ปีที่แล้ว +1

      brobally not because it look suspect

    • @CTimmerman
      @CTimmerman ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ooneybird27 Kinetic energy of the propelled ions moves the device, similar to ion thrusters on satellites.

    • @airierwitch4116
      @airierwitch4116 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ooneybird27 It's much more efficient to propel the fuel with an ionic engine, rather than just the pressure of the gas - although many spacecraft do use pressurized gas maneuvering jets! Ionic propulsion produces much less thrust at once, meaning you can't accelerate very fast, but it's so much more efficient that you need a very small amount of fuel to propel the spacecraft. You just have to wait longer for it to get where you want it to.

  • @truegret7778
    @truegret7778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I worked during summer break whilst in college at a power supply (Space Shuttle flat CRT monitors, military displays, etc. - 15-30KV @ 1-4 microamps as I recall). We had an ionic sculpture with a spinning spiral wire balanced and spinning on pencil lead. This was connected to a high voltage power supply - it was pretty cool, wish I still had it.

  • @shankarraj3433
    @shankarraj3433 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video. 👍

  • @statwizard
    @statwizard 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done! +1 Subscribed. 👍

  • @joshimilind10
    @joshimilind10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    SpaceX's Starlink uses ion thrusters to coast in their orbit from when they are deployed.

    • @ovidius2000
      @ovidius2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      howMuchTimeTheGasLastsInTheSatteliteUntilItsConsumed?

    • @xavier6130
      @xavier6130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      useYourSpaceBar

    • @GravityRoller
      @GravityRoller 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ovidius2000 WonderingSame...,OrWhereDoesGasComeFrom(Generated/Stored/etc)?

    • @fermented8006
      @fermented8006 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ovidius2000 At some point the satellites would just enter the atmosphere if out of fuel, no clue how long they would last

    • @AntonisDimopoulos
      @AntonisDimopoulos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ion thrusters are used in spaceflight since the 80's

  • @sselesUneeuQ
    @sselesUneeuQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Me, at work on a break: ah yes, wonderful stuff *sipping my soda in lalaland*

  • @rootsharp9946
    @rootsharp9946 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks. I knew this was possible 10 years ago but I still couldn't figure out the efficiency. I guess no one knows.. yet. Good luck for the awesome people developing that drone.

  • @reconghostmedia
    @reconghostmedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I could of watched these videos back when I was at uni. Totally love it!

  • @vitaminprotein6549
    @vitaminprotein6549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    The best scientific explanation channel on youtube.

    • @MaximMarkiw
      @MaximMarkiw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Golden Pepe haha

    • @DennisJDuran
      @DennisJDuran 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This comment made me follow this channel.

  • @richardpagel6959
    @richardpagel6959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I really like your videos! You explain things simple enough for everyone to understand, using some very nice visual experiments to do so.

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    superb. you finally give hope to an emerging technology. please make an updated video about this topic, i.e. ionic thrust. thanks very mooch!

  • @Erebus.666.
    @Erebus.666. ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a cool, informative video. Thanks Action Lab, I feel smarter already.

  • @thunderstrike8935
    @thunderstrike8935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Congratulations on getting to 3 million subscribers!

  • @ashkanr4796
    @ashkanr4796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    if you were my science teacher, id probably graduated from Harvard by now. you are a very inspirational person and I'm 38 and saying this. idk what you do besides YT, but imagine if you teach science to kids, it's gonna be awesome. you make future scientists. make them inspired and enthusiastic. you are a very awesome individual and I never get out of your channel disappointed. wish you all the best in the world. love and respect

  • @BBBCanada1
    @BBBCanada1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best explanation I’ve seen so far.

  • @caryde7445
    @caryde7445 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for a great video! I appreciate that you refrain from using technical language

  • @narayanbandodker5482
    @narayanbandodker5482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I have an idea you can try out: Since light travels faster in a vacuum than in air, can you show light refracting in your vacuum chamber? You can shine a laser through it, see where it lands, then create a vacuum and watch the laser change course

    • @realryder2626
      @realryder2626 ปีที่แล้ว

      Take it to the hadron collidor... and send it

  • @poppedweasel
    @poppedweasel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +159

    Ooh, with a giant tesla coil we can make the Earth's orbit more eliptic or inclined. We might not have an atmosphere afterward, but it's an option for solving global warming. Well done, Action Lab.

    • @arthemis1039
      @arthemis1039 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      When the answer is worst than the problem !

    • @user-qy2wf2lt6v
      @user-qy2wf2lt6v 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It will be just 300 ℃ during the day, so not sure hwo that solves our global warming problem. Maybe the -160 ℃ during the night will compensate for it.

    • @il_moddo
      @il_moddo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I see this as an absolute win

    • @mrono1910
      @mrono1910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You cant alter the movement of our planet without ejecting mass from it or moving mass closer or further from the center

    • @poppedweasel
      @poppedweasel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mrono1910 That's why I suggested we might not have an atmosphere afterwards. (Now someone's going to calculate how mach deltaV the atmosphere's worth just to tell me my joke is nonsense)

  • @saikiran007
    @saikiran007 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation through experiments!

  • @HopeOfJoe
    @HopeOfJoe ปีที่แล้ว

    Captured my attention from the first few words. Very nicely done 🎉

  • @pramitharyan5167
    @pramitharyan5167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The action lab NEVER ceases to AMAZE

  • @diobrando9842
    @diobrando9842 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Space engineers players: “hey, I’ve seen this one before, it’s a classic

    • @dakat5131
      @dakat5131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Except in SE the ion thrusters work worse in the atmosphere.

    • @jaxjax2011
      @jaxjax2011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dakat5131 its because se thrusters are hets

    • @dishsoap8428
      @dishsoap8428 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah until you bring forth the world

  • @stephenross8463
    @stephenross8463 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know nothing but the absolute basics (probs even less than that) about propulsion systems......but I understood every word of this presentation....thank you Sir.

  • @chuckandmax7313
    @chuckandmax7313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    When I see technology like this being shown to me, it just makes me wonder exactly how far advanced our technology really is. I’m sure that there are top secret technologies that the government has created that are far note advanced. And if you can do this test on such a small scale I can only imagine what it’s like at a full scale. I am certain that we will be able to use this technology in the aeronautics industry and from what I’ve learned on other channels I know that there is an abundance of power surging in the upper atmosphere as low as 150 feet that planes can access without having to have a great deal of onboard energy cells.

    • @rxonmymind8362
      @rxonmymind8362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Think levitation.

    • @Idiotboxxx
      @Idiotboxxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Philadelphia Experiment

    • @AnonEyeMouse
      @AnonEyeMouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The problem is scale. This works well enough on tiny things but once you start adding mass it gets uneventful very quickly. Think about an ant. Notoriously can carry fifty times its own weight but if you were to scale it up to the size of a car, it wouldn't be able to stand or lift its head.
      Scale and gravity are a real kick in the crotch.

    • @icamefromthestars7647
      @icamefromthestars7647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly what I’ve been researching for 20 years now? Energy is never wasted, only transformed? There’s almost a endless amount of energy out there THAT HAS TO BE TAPPED?

    • @RootzRockBand
      @RootzRockBand ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fighter Jets have using this tech since the end of ww2. Do you think the wings of a fighter jet could possibly carry the amount of fuel needed to power fighter jets? They use microwave plasma engines, look at the exhaust nozzle on the back of a fighter jet when it’s in action, no smoke, they are not burning fuel.

  • @SURENARUN
    @SURENARUN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Awesome video🔥🔥🔥
    Why are you not giving advertisements in the video😓.I need to contribute to you.
    I couldn't afford for join button or action lab kit😖😓 .I will never skip an advertisements in your video,I will watch it fully 😀.
    Btw congrats for 3 Million 🔥🔥👍👍

    • @maxtv333thesuperstar3
      @maxtv333thesuperstar3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      even if its 1 hour long?

    • @sa-zq4eq
      @sa-zq4eq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tamil aa bro

    • @SURENARUN
      @SURENARUN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sa-zq4eq yeah bro

    • @SURENARUN
      @SURENARUN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maxtv333thesuperstar3 no ad will be of 1 hour bro...

    • @SURENARUN
      @SURENARUN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @LuckyStar no bro

  • @davidmcnamee136
    @davidmcnamee136 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    It would be interesting to see if a “ducted ion fan” could be made by recessing the needle into the airplane a little, and making the body of the plane hollow so that air can be accelerated throigh it.

  • @GettinReal
    @GettinReal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Thank you!

  • @thechoku9765
    @thechoku9765 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your explanation, now i know how those "bladeless fan" works

  • @titanproductions3628
    @titanproductions3628 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Learned more here than in school love your TH-cam channel ❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @sorinciolacu9929
    @sorinciolacu9929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Action Lab, you never fail to inspire and amaze me. I love your content and the way you present it. Never stop and always continue to bring informative lessons to the world. You are doing a great job doing what you do well done!

  • @nealwright5630
    @nealwright5630 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember, when I was a pre-teen, our Childcraft encyclopedias had ionic propulsion explained. I always wanted to build something to show it. And I always wondered why spacecraft did not use it.

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm obsessed with ion anything. This is awesome 👍

  • @RCPlaneAddict
    @RCPlaneAddict 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    That was amazing. I wonder how big, and how much energy you would need for a ionic jet to propel say a 80mm foam plane. Would be good to try.

    • @ne1cup
      @ne1cup 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      look into "lifters" large but light structure using ionic breeze

  • @DlSASTERCHlLD
    @DlSASTERCHlLD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Even if this will prove to be impossible to engineer in any useful scales, this is a fascinating concept. Also, "ion thrust planes" has a good ring to it, haha.

    • @dr.zoidberg8666
      @dr.zoidberg8666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's funny to imagine a distant future when all aircrafts have been replaced with ion thruster propelled versions & the emission of greenhouse gasses is under control... but suddenly there's a new crisis of too much ozone building up in the atmosphere because of all the ion thrusters.

    • @insectbite1714
      @insectbite1714 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dr.zoidberg8666 yet there are chemicals that remove ozone and most planes fly in space or near space so the ozone will instantly escape

  • @lahcenekabour7542
    @lahcenekabour7542 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If would be nice if you can make a DYI video for those planes. Thanks

  • @fonwoolridge
    @fonwoolridge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating... thank you!

  • @krispockell685
    @krispockell685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    "You supply the gas thats going to get propelled out the back." I sure do, you know me so well.

    • @laffbath6740
      @laffbath6740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can I get a quarter? Wya

    • @akakonqoro
      @akakonqoro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😂😂😂😂

    • @stewarth8390
      @stewarth8390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All of a sudden bake beans and the farting scene in Blazing Saddles comes to mind as a gas source 😂😂

  • @matakaw4287
    @matakaw4287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That's a novel way to pass gas. Congratulations on 3M!

  • @domcizek
    @domcizek 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent, i learned something i did not know, keep ti up

  • @tushar5670
    @tushar5670 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a video. So entertaining and moreover very informative.

  • @playerscience
    @playerscience 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your videos never fail to surprise me
    I've learnt al lot from your videos.
    Thank you very much. Keep making such amazing content. 🥰👌👌👍👍🙏🙏

  • @bipinthakur8901
    @bipinthakur8901 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This channel is underrated. He deserves more attention

    • @7531monkey
      @7531monkey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He should have like 3 million subscribers.

  • @dancanrv2
    @dancanrv2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    SO ... VERY ... COOOOOL !!!! Thanks for the demo !!!

  • @javi8431
    @javi8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats a good idea, put this for everyone to see so all can give feedback from this so he can screen everyones idea to get something that does work for free.

  • @mr.medico9863
    @mr.medico9863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Ironic Propulsion : *Exists*
    Vacuum Chamber : *I'm gonna end this man's whole career*

    • @Otzkar
      @Otzkar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Ionic

    • @fikhhgg
      @fikhhgg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha

    • @nambam5409
      @nambam5409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Unlucky autocorrect

    • @_ruted
      @_ruted 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol thats probably why his suit stops working at high altitudes

    • @rpeetz
      @rpeetz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True ionic thrusters works in vacuum, they accelerate the gas and newton laws do the rest.

  • @ktankinfinity
    @ktankinfinity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learn more from this TH-cam channel than my entire life in school

  • @nadeejayasekara3185
    @nadeejayasekara3185 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the best explanation I ever found

  • @Coffeesurgeons
    @Coffeesurgeons 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wo that's useful in the real world you are so clever! If i ever need to fly a dust bunny an inch across the table this might be just the thing I need.

  • @Neo_Zeon
    @Neo_Zeon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    It's how TIE fighters from Star Wars get their thrust. Twin Ion Engines.

    • @thebzo
      @thebzo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice!

    • @benisjammin8926
      @benisjammin8926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Could be wrong but that sounds way to weak

    • @scottowens398
      @scottowens398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@benisjammin8926 I want to make a *"I'm too weak!"* joke, but my real answer is it's Star Wars. George Lucas can do whatever he wants. =)

    • @thebzo
      @thebzo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benisjammin8926 It's a fictional world 🤣

    • @serenityofcognition920
      @serenityofcognition920 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No oxygen is in space

  • @shotanet888
    @shotanet888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Finally, I understand how Hayabusa's engine worked!!

  • @gabelster3729
    @gabelster3729 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video served me to develop my high school monography. I’m SO grateful this dude made this video

  • @critical1388
    @critical1388 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really cool, thx for the lesson. .

  • @bornoflightningthunder8162
    @bornoflightningthunder8162 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    An idea: make this thing spin in water
    Edit: if my math is right the propulsion would be nearly 16 times more than it was in air

    • @SqueezeboxOfDelights
      @SqueezeboxOfDelights 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      just don't stick your fingers in the water while it's running...

    • @dwaraganathanrengasamy6169
      @dwaraganathanrengasamy6169 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe the viscosity is pretty high for water to make this work... Nice thought though...👍😃

    • @inventor121
      @inventor121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Normally I'd say you'd be right, but the water would decompose into hydrogen and oxygen at that point.

    • @inventor121
      @inventor121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Deborah Ajao ion propulsion relies on ionization and water can only be ionized to a very small extent. At high voltages it becomes more likely that the water will electrolyse.

    • @inventor121
      @inventor121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Deborah Ajao it will but I doubt it would work well. At some point it's just going to split off into hydrogen and oxygen. You might get some passable thrust but nothing that could beat even the weakest of electric motors.

  • @markyWWE234
    @markyWWE234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Just wanna say that you are still one of my favorite science channel. Keep it up man😁

    • @WingmanSR
      @WingmanSR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. Though I do miss "Hey, Vsauce! Michael here!", and I still love Veritasium, though that is a bit more academically in-depth. Action Lab is a great channel for teaching people not about science as much, but why they should *_enjoy_* learning about the sciences.

  • @darrylwashington1398
    @darrylwashington1398 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved it
    keep up the good work😸👍

  • @negrodeus666
    @negrodeus666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg you are a master thanks for your commitment gracias amigo!

  • @LaurenceSandman
    @LaurenceSandman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating! What sort of efficiency can these work at - thrust out/power in?

  • @pranavcv1265
    @pranavcv1265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

    Meanwhile Electro boom: Hold my electric shock ****************

    • @fikhhgg
      @fikhhgg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ok

    • @typicalmooyt69
      @typicalmooyt69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He explains it in a funnier way

    • @That_Soviet_Memer
      @That_Soviet_Memer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      if electro boom has the same characteristics as the action lab
      Ok we are going to do it
      1 2 3
      A Capacitor just exploded

    • @sharan-kumar
      @sharan-kumar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@That_Soviet_Memer 😂

    • @That_Soviet_Memer
      @That_Soviet_Memer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sharan-kumar Electrboom is the god of Profanity and the devil of free energy

  • @db5202
    @db5202 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting! I saw a drown once recently with no moving parts. Looked like a stack of hot air furnace filters.

  • @Colaris99
    @Colaris99 ปีที่แล้ว

    That looks amazing!

  • @sumittrivedi3759
    @sumittrivedi3759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are a genius. The quality of content is extremely good ! God Bless your efforts !!

  • @therice
    @therice 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    So basically the reason why I'm so ass at going into an orbit in Kerbal Space Program is because I keep using thrusters that don't work in the vacuum of space 😂😂😂

    • @thatoneguy9291
      @thatoneguy9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Lmao if you’re using Ion thrusters they’re relatively weak for large crafts, they work fine though if I remember correctly.

    • @niks660097
      @niks660097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thatoneguy9291 no ion thrusters are not powerful(in kerbal), probably they'll add more parameters(future updates) in sync with latest inventions...

    • @StrikeEagIe
      @StrikeEagIe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ion thrusters have incredible ISP and efficiency but TERRIBLE thrust to weight ratio.

    • @luckylmj
      @luckylmj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ion engines in ksp only work in space
      but they're really weak

    • @RandomPerson-yq1qk
      @RandomPerson-yq1qk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ion thrusters for space travel DO work in space. In fact their main usefulness is in space because they produce very little thrust for their weight so in the atmosphere they are pretty useless. However because there is no air drag in space the ion thruster's weak thrust can last for years because they are fuel efficient and a weak thrust over years ends up giving you more total acceleration than rocket engines.
      So Ion Thrusters for modern spacetravel are mostly useful for long lasting missions.

  • @Capochin950
    @Capochin950 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent .Something to think about there.

  • @JH-ux1re
    @JH-ux1re 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super cool! Thank you ! I love your videos!

  • @zantar666
    @zantar666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The amount of great content you put out amazes me. Thanks

  • @nishanebazzking7251
    @nishanebazzking7251 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dude, why are you so Amazing!!

  • @detroitredwings7130
    @detroitredwings7130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well...that just took the trophy for the coolest thing I've seen in a long time.

  • @thomasbolton8373
    @thomasbolton8373 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent demonstration